Looking at this X-ray, here's my assessment:

What the film actually shows: This is a dorsoplantar (top-down) view of the forefoot and midfoot — you can see the phalanges (toes), metatarsals, and the tarsal bones (cuneiforms, cuboid, navicular). The very bottom of the image is an overexposed, bright, cut-off region that would correspond to the hindfoot/talus area, but it is essentially "burned out" (too bright/no contrast) and cropped at the edge of the film.

Talus specifically: The talus is a hindfoot bone that sits proximal to the navicular, under the tibia and fibula. A standard AP/DP foot view like this one is not the correct projection to evaluate the talus — it's mainly used for forefoot and midfoot pathology. Talar fractures are properly assessed on dedicated ankle AP, lateral, and mortise views (and CT if a fracture is suspected clinically, since plain films can miss subtle talar neck/body/lateral process fractures).

On the visible bones in this image: I don't see an obvious fracture line, cortical step-off, or displacement in the phalanges, metatarsals, cuneiforms, navicular, or cuboid that are actually visible here.

Recommendation: If there's clinical concern for a talus fracture (hindfoot pain, swelling, inability to bear weight after trauma), a dedicated ankle series (AP/lateral/mortise) should be obtained and read by a radiologist; a CT is often warranted since talar fractures (especially of the neck, lateral process, or posterior process) are frequently missed on plain films - as noted in Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults, talus fractures are the second most common tarsal bone fracture and carry a real risk of avascular necrosis if displaced, so they shouldn't be excluded based on a forefoot film alone.

I'd suggest showing the actual ankle-focused films (not this forefoot view) to a radiologist or treating clinician for a definitive read on the talus.