I now have comprehensive information from the textbooks. Here is the full answer:
Achalasia Cardia
Definition
Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder characterized by two hallmark features:
- Impaired (failed) relaxation of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) with swallowing
- Aperistalsis in the smooth muscle esophagus
These result from loss of ganglion cells within the myenteric (Auerbach's) plexus in the wall of the smooth muscle esophagus, including the LES.
Epidemiology
- Incidence: ~1-2 per 100,000 per year
- Peak age: 30-60 years; bimodal distribution (young adults + elderly)
- Equal sex distribution
- Can occur at any age, including children
Etiopathogenesis
Pathological Mechanism
The core defect is degeneration of inhibitory ganglion neurons in the myenteric plexus. These neurons normally:
- Mediate deglutitive inhibition (LES relaxation via NO and VIP)
- Coordinate sequential peristalsis in the esophageal body
Their loss explains both hallmark abnormalities - impaired LES relaxation and aperistalsis.
What is lost:
- NO synthase (nitric oxide - the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter)
- VIP (Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide)-staining neurons at the gastroesophageal junction
- Partial preservation (or loss) of excitatory cholinergic neurons
Key evidence: CCK normally stimulates inhibitory neurons to relax the LES - in achalasia it paradoxically increases LES pressure, confirming inhibitory neuron absence.
Etiology
Evidence increasingly points to an autoimmune process in genetically susceptible individuals:
- Myenteric plexus infiltrate is predominantly cytotoxic T cells
- Antibodies against myenteric neurons detected in serum
- Association with specific HLA alleles
- Suspected trigger: HSV-1 (Herpes Simplex Virus type 1) - a chronic/latent infection
- The degree of ganglion cell loss parallels disease duration
Secondary Causes (Pseudoachalasia)
- Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi) - also affects heart, brain, GI tract
- Malignancy (especially esophageal/GEJ carcinoma) - must be excluded in patients >60 years with short symptom duration and significant weight loss
- Allgrove (Triple A) Syndrome - achalasia + alacrima + adrenal insufficiency
Chicago Classification (HRM Subtypes)
| Type | Description | Treatment Response |
|---|
| Type I (Classic) | Complete aperistalsis, no pressurization; late disease | Moderate - 81% success LHM |
| Type II (With compression) | Aperistalsis + panesophageal pressurization; early disease | Best - up to 100% PD, 93% LHM |
| Type III (Spastic) | Premature/spastic contractions distally; unique pathogenesis (inflammation without destruction) | Poor with PD (~40%); better with LHM (86%) or POEM |
Type II represents early disease before progressive esophageal dilatation; Type I is end-stage.
Clinical Features
Symptoms (in decreasing frequency):
| Symptom | Frequency |
|---|
| Dysphagia - both solids AND liquids | ~95% |
| Regurgitation of undigested food | ~70% |
| Heartburn (from food stasis/fermentation, NOT acid reflux) | 40-50% |
| Chest pain (thought to be from esophageal distension/longitudinal muscle spasm) | 40-50% |
| Weight loss | Variable |
| Aspiration pneumonia | Up to 10% in advanced cases |
Important pearls:
- Dysphagia is simultaneous to both solids and liquids from the onset (unlike mechanical obstruction = solids first)
- Onset is gradual, present for years before diagnosis
- Regurgitation is non-bilious, non-acid, mixed with copious mucoid saliva - may occur hours after eating
- "Heartburn" is from bacterial fermentation of retained food, not GERD - many patients are mistakenly treated with PPIs for years
- Chest pain may improve spontaneously over time unlike dysphagia
Eckardt Score (severity assessment)
Attributes 0-3 points each to: dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss, chest pain (total 0-12). Score ≤3 = treatment success.
Diagnosis
1. Barium Swallow
- First-line imaging; provides anatomic information
- Classic finding: "Bird-beak" deformity - dilated proximal esophagus tapering smoothly at the distal end/GEJ
- Other features: air-fluid level, slow emptying into stomach, tertiary contractions
- Can show sigmoid esophagus (advanced disease with massive dilatation + tortuosity) - important for surgical planning
- May be normal in ~30% of early cases
Barium swallow showing dilated esophagus with characteristic narrowing at the LES:
2. Endoscopy (EGD)
- Performed first in all patients with dysphagia to exclude malignancy (pseudoachalasia)
- Findings: retained food/saliva (~60%), esophagitis from food stasis, Candida infection
- Normal in ~40% of patients
- Classic feel: "pop" or resistance on passing scope through LES - scope passes with gentle pressure
3. High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) - Gold Standard
- Most sensitive test; establishes diagnosis AND subtype (Type I/II/III)
- Key findings:
- Impaired LES relaxation - elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP >15 mmHg)
- Aperistalsis in the esophageal body
- Elevated LES resting pressure (often >45 mmHg)
- Essential for Chicago Classification subtyping
4. Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (FLIP)
- Newer complementary tool
- Uses impedance planimetry to assess esophageal compliance and distensibility
- Useful when manometry is non-classic but suspicion remains high
5. Ambulatory pH Monitoring
- Reserved for patients complaining of heartburn
- Distinguishes true GERD from food-fermentation pseudoreflux
- Achalasia shows: slow progressive pH drift below 4 (fermentation), NOT discrete reflux events
Treatment
Treatment is palliative - the underlying neuropathology cannot be reversed. Goal: reduce LES pressure to allow gravity-assisted esophageal emptying.
Pharmacologic (Temporizing - Poor Efficacy)
- Calcium channel blockers: Sublingual nifedipine (30-40 mg/day before meals) - side effects (flushing, hypotension, headache) limit use
- Nitrates: Isosorbide dinitrate sublingually before meals - headache is common
- Sildenafil: Blocks PDE-5, raises cGMP, relaxes smooth muscle - short duration, high cost
- All reduce LES pressure modestly; best used as temporizing measures or in frail patients unfit for definitive therapy
Botulinum Toxin Injection (Endoscopic)
- Mechanism: Irreversibly inhibits ACh release from presynaptic cholinergic terminals
- Technique: 80-100 units injected in 4 quadrants at the LES
- Efficacy: 80% symptom relief at 1 month; drops to 40% at 12 months
- Not durable - effect reversed by new axon growth
- Repeated injections cause local fibrosis - increases technical difficulty and mucosal perforation risk if LHM later needed
- Reserved for: elderly/frail patients who are poor candidates for PD, LHM, or POEM
Pneumatic Dilation (PD)
- Disrupts circular muscle of LES by forceful balloon distension to ≥3 cm diameter
- Graded approach: start with 30 mm, escalate to 35 mm and 40 mm for persistent symptoms
- Rigiflex dilators - non-compliant cylindrical balloons passed over guidewire, positioned fluoroscopically
- Efficacy: ~86% success at 2 years; 82% at 5 years (comparable to LHM)
- ~25% of patients require repeat dilations
- Risk of perforation: ~1% (comparable to LHM)
- Best for Type II achalasia (100% efficacy in some series)
- Poor response predictors: age <40, male sex, Type I or III, large esophageal diameter, post-dilation LES pressure >10 mmHg
Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM)
- Surgical division of the circular muscle fibers of the LES and cardia (6 cm on esophagus, 2-3 cm onto stomach)
- Always combined with partial fundoplication (Dor or Toupet) to prevent post-op GERD
- Efficacy: ~90% overall; best in Type II, lower in Type I and III
- Durable results; 5-year success ~84%
- Risk of perforation ~1%; post-op GERD ~10-15%
- Superior to PD for Type III achalasia (~86% vs. ~40%)
POEM - Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy
- Endoscopic technique pioneered by Dr. Haruhiro Inoue (2008)
- Submucosal tunnel created endoscopically; circular muscle fibers divided from inside
- Advantages over LHM: no external incisions, longer myotomy possible (especially useful for Type III), shorter recovery
- Particularly effective for Type III (spastic) achalasia because a longer myotomy can be extended proximally
- Main drawback: higher rate of post-procedural GERD (no fundoplication routinely added)
- Recent meta-analysis (2024) shows comparable efficacy to LHM with fundoplication; POEM has lower dysphagia recurrence but higher reflux rates
Esophagectomy
- Last resort for end-stage/sigmoid achalasia that has failed all other treatments
- Also indicated if malignancy cannot be excluded
Complications
| Complication | Notes |
|---|
| Aspiration pneumonia | From chronic regurgitation; up to 10% advanced cases |
| Esophageal candidiasis | From food stasis |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | Long-term risk (~3-8% over decades); mechanism: chronic mucosal irritation from food stasis and fermentation |
| Megaesophagus / Sigmoid esophagus | End-stage dilatation with tortuosity |
| Airway compromise | Rare; dilated esophagus compresses membranous trachea |
Summary: Treatment Algorithm
Achalasia diagnosed (HRM subtyped)
|
├── Type I or II → Pneumatic Dilation (first-line) OR LHM
| └── Type II specifically: PD ~100% effective
|
├── Type III (spastic) → LHM or POEM preferred (PD inferior)
|
├── Poor surgical candidate / elderly frail → Botox injection
|
└── End-stage sigmoid esophagus → Esophagectomy
Sources: Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease | Sabiston Textbook of Surgery (p. 1705-1706) | Ganong's Review of Medical Physiology | Clinical Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 3e | S Das Manual of Clinical Surgery | PMID
38775883 (Heller vs. POEM meta-analysis, 2024)