S.497 IPC according to new bns section
Section 497 IPC dealt with adultery - a man having sexual intercourse with the wife of another man without that husband's consent. Under the old IPC, it was a criminal offence punishable with up to 5 years imprisonment, fine, or both. Notably, the wife was not punishable as an abettor. This provision was struck down by the Supreme Court in Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) as unconstitutional.
Searching sources...
Searching the Web
Section 497 IPC equivalent BNS Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023
Here is a complete comparison of S. 497 IPC and its status under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS):
S. 497 IPC (Adultery) - Status under BNS
What S. 497 IPC Said
Section 497, IPC defined and punished adultery:
"Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both. In such case the wife shall not be punishable as an abettor."
Key features of S. 497 IPC:
- Only the man could be prosecuted; the wife was explicitly protected from punishment even as an abettor
- Treated adultery as a crime against the husband, not against the woman
- Punishment: up to 5 years imprisonment, or fine, or both
Why S. 497 IPC Was Struck Down
The Supreme Court in Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) - (2018) 2 SCC 189 unanimously declared S. 497 IPC unconstitutional on the following grounds:
- Violated Article 14 (right to equality) - arbitrary gender distinction
- Violated Article 15 (prohibition of discrimination on grounds of sex)
- Violated Article 21 (right to privacy, dignity, and autonomy)
- The provision treated women as the "property" of their husbands, not as autonomous individuals
- It was based on outdated gender stereotypes
S. 497 IPC under BNS, 2023
Section 497 IPC has been DELETED / OMITTED entirely from the BNS.
The BNS, which came into force on 1 July 2024, does not contain any equivalent provision for adultery as a criminal offence. This reflects the Supreme Court's 2018 ruling.
| IPC Section | Subject | BNS Equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| S. 497 | Adultery | DELETED (No corresponding section) |
What BNS Retains - Related Provision
While adultery as a standalone offence is gone, BNS Section 84 (corresponding to IPC S. 498) is retained:
BNS S. 84 - Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman Punishes a man who takes or entices away any woman who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, from that man or from any person having the care of her on behalf of that man, with intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person.
- Punishment: imprisonment up to 2 years, or fine, or both
This is different from adultery - it targets enticement/abduction of a married woman, not consensual intercourse.
Summary
| Point | Detail |
|---|---|
| Old IPC provision | S. 497 - Adultery (criminal offence) |
| Supreme Court ruling | Joseph Shine v. UOI (2018) - struck down as unconstitutional |
| BNS status | Completely omitted / deleted |
| BNS in force since | 1 July 2024 |
| Related BNS provision | S. 84 BNS (enticement of married woman) = old S. 498 IPC |
In short, S. 497 IPC has no corresponding section in the BNS - adultery is no longer a criminal offence in India. The legislature acknowledged the Supreme Court's position and removed it entirely when drafting the new code.
True virgin vs false virgin according to narayan reddy
Reading File
Searching sources...
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Good - I have found the relevant sections. Now let me search specifically for Narayan Reddy's textbook and also read the full sections from PC Dikshit and Parikh's.
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Let me also read the Parikh's section which specifically discusses true vs false virgin, and search for Narayan Reddy's content:
Reading File
Finding Sources
Narayan Reddy's textbook is "The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology." Let me search it directly.
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
The content was truncated. Let me read the continuation which should have the true vs false virgin table/comparison:
Reading File
Reading File
I now have all the content from Narayan Reddy's book (The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 36th edition). The Table 16.1 is actually "Virginity vs Defloration." Let me now compile the full answer - the true vs false virgin distinction is well covered in the text at lines 8092-8115. Here is the comprehensive answer:
True Virgin vs False Virgin - According to Narayan Reddy (Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 36th Ed.)
Key Concept
An intact hymen does not automatically prove virginity. With an intact hymen, there can be both true virgins and false virgins. This is the central point in Narayan Reddy's discussion of virginity diagnosis.
"The presence of unruptured hymen is a presumption but is not absolute proof of virginity... With an intact hymen, there are true virgins and false virgins."
- The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 36th Ed., p. 383
Why False Virgins Exist
The hymen may not rupture even after repeated sexual intercourse if it is:
- Loose, lax, folded and elastic
- Thick, tough and fleshy
- Capable of displacement, distortion and stretching without rupture
Cases have been recorded of pregnant women and even sex workers in whom the hymen was found intact.
TRUE VIRGIN
A woman who has never had sexual intercourse and whose hymen is intact.
Findings:
| Feature | True Virgin |
|---|---|
| Hymen | Intact, rigid, inelastic; edges distinct, smooth and regular; narrow opening - barely admits the tip of the little finger (terminal phalanx only) |
| Labia majora | Apposed to each other, fully developed, completely close the vaginal orifice |
| Labia minora | In contact with each other, covered by labia majora |
| Fourchette | Intact |
| Fossa navicularis | Intact |
| Vestibule | Narrow |
| Vagina | Narrow, rugae well folded, vault more conical |
| Breasts | Firm, elastic, hemispherical; small undeveloped nipple; areola pink (fair) or dark-brown (dark-complexioned) |
FALSE VIRGIN
A woman who has had sexual intercourse but whose hymen is still intact (due to the above-mentioned characteristics of the hymen).
Findings:
| Feature | False Virgin |
|---|---|
| Hymen | Intact but loose, elastic, with wide opening allowing passage of two or more fingers |
| Labia majora | Not apposed, not prominent; lower end vaginal orifice may be visible |
| Labia minora | Not in contact; exposed and separated from labia majora |
| Fourchette | Torn or intact |
| Fossa navicularis | Disappears |
| Vestibule | Wide/gaping |
| Vagina | Roomy; after repeated intercourse, grows in length; rugae less obvious |
Summary Comparison Table (Narayan Reddy - Table 16.1)
| Trait | True Virgin (Virginity) | False Virgin (Defloration) |
|---|---|---|
| Hymen | Intact, rigid, inelastic; narrow opening (tip of little finger) | Intact but loose, elastic; wide opening (2+ fingers) |
| Labia majora | Apposed, close vaginal orifice | Not apposed; vaginal orifice visible |
| Labia minora | In contact, covered by labia majora | Exposed, separated |
| Fourchette | Intact | Torn or intact |
| Fossa navicularis | Intact | Disappears |
| Vestibule | Narrow | Wide |
| Vagina | Narrow, rugae folded, conical vault | Roomy, rugae less obvious |
Medicolegal Conclusion (Narayan Reddy)
Signs taken together may be regarded as evidence of virginity, but taken singly they cannot be so regarded. The three combined signs that suggest virginity are:
- An intact hymen
- Normal condition of fourchette and posterior commissure
- A narrow vagina with rugose walls
"The diagnosis of virginity is difficult, and, in many cases, a physical examination of the genital organs may not be helpful."
- The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 36th Ed., p. 383-384
Quod de hanc according to narayan reddy
Searching sources...
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web
quod de hanc forensic medicine Narayan Reddy virginity
The phrase "quod de hanc" does not appear in the library text or in web results for Narayan Reddy. Let me search more broadly - this appears to be a Latin legal maxim used in forensic medicine context, possibly related to rape or sexual offences.
Finding Sources
Searching the Web
"quod de hanc" forensic medicine legal maxim
The phrase "quod de hanc" does not appear in Narayan Reddy's textbook in the library, nor in web results. It is possible the user may be referring to "Quod de ea" - a Latin legal maxim used in the context of rape/sexual offences in forensic medicine. Let me search for this.
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
The term "quod de hanc" does not appear in Narayan Reddy's textbook or in any forensic medicine source. It is likely a spelling/phonetic variation. The closest Latin phrase used in forensic medicine - specifically in Narayan Reddy - is "aptae viris" (making young girls apt/fit for sexual intercourse). Another possibility is the user means "Corpus delicti" or another Latin maxim.
Let me check if this could be a phonetic rendering of something else entirely - perhaps the user heard it spoken and is writing it phonetically.
Searching the Web
"quod de hanc" OR "quod de hac" Latin legal maxim rape forensic
The phrase "quod de hanc" does not exist in Narayan Reddy's textbook (36th edition) or in any forensic medicine or legal medicine literature found. Here is an honest answer:
"Quod de hanc" - Not Found in Narayan Reddy
The phrase "quod de hanc" does not appear in:
- Narayan Reddy's Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (36th edition, 2026) - searched fully
- Any forensic medicine or legal maxim database
Possible Interpretations
You may be thinking of one of these similar Latin phrases actually used in forensic medicine:
1. "Aptae viris" (used by Narayan Reddy)
- Meaning: "fit/apt for men" (for sexual intercourse)
- Context: Used in Narayan Reddy to describe the practice of vaginal stretching using sola pith inserted into the vagina of very young girls to render them fit for sexual intercourse
- Appears in the chapter on Virginity (Ch. 16)
2. "Rara avis" (used in PC Dikshit)
- Meaning: "a rare bird" - i.e., a true virgin is as rare as a bird
- Context: "A virgin was once defined by judges as a rara avis and so far as the medical evidence is concerned, the definition is almost correct" - PC Dikshit
3. "Corpus delicti"
- Meaning: "body of the crime" - the material evidence that a crime has been committed
- Widely used in forensic medicine in rape and sexual offence cases
4. "Nemo moriturus praesumitur mentire"
- Meaning: "No man at the point of death is presumed to lie"
- Basis of dying declarations in forensic medicine
Could you clarify where you encountered the phrase "quod de hanc"? It is possible it was heard phonetically from a lecture or video, and the exact Latin spelling may be different. If you can provide more context (which chapter it relates to - rape, virginity, consent, etc.), I can locate the correct term precisely.
What is quod de hanc
Searching sources...
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Found it - the correct term is "impotence quoad hanc" (not "quod de hanc"). Let me now read the full sections from both Parikh's and Narayan Reddy.
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Now let me read the Narayan Reddy section on impotence to get the full context:
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
I now have the complete picture. Here is the full answer:
"Quoad Hanc" (not "quod de hanc") - According to Narayan Reddy
The correct Latin term is "Quoad Hanc" (sometimes written as "Quoad Hoc"). You likely heard it spoken quickly in a lecture and wrote it phonetically as "quod de hanc."
Meaning
"Quoad Hanc" is a Latin phrase meaning "as regards this (woman)" or "with respect to her."
In forensic medicine it refers to a specific type of impotence:
"Quoad hoc (as far as this) is an individual who may be impotent with one particular woman but not with others."
- Narayan Reddy, Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 36th Ed., Ch. 15, p. 377
Full Context - Psychological Impotence
Quoad hanc falls under psychological (psychogenic) causes of impotence in males:
- A man may be potent with one particular woman but not with another - this selective impotence is called impotence quoad hanc
- It arises from disgust of the sexual act or dislike of the partner, emotional disturbances, anxiety, or psychological aversion to a specific person
- The man is physically capable of intercourse (genitals and sexual function are normal), but he cannot perform with his specific wife/partner
Medicolegal Importance
This concept is critical in matrimonial/divorce cases:
- Legally, marriage is a contract which presupposes the capability of fulfillment of physical union (coitus)
- A man may sue his wife or be sued for non-consummation of marriage
- The court must determine whether impotence is:
- General (with all women) - true organic/functional impotence
- Quoad hanc (selective - only with his wife) - psychogenic impotence specifically towards that partner
Under the Hindu Divorce Act, for impotence to be grounds for divorce:
- It must have existed prior to marriage
- It must be permanent
- It must be incurable even by operation
"In a divorce suit, the potency must be ascertained in relation to the married partner only."
- Parikh's Textbook of Medical Jurisprudence, Ch. 24
A famous Indian case (Patel vs. Madgavkar) involved a husband who was found to be impotent as regards his wife, although he was generally potent with others - a classic case of impotence quoad hanc.
Summary
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Quoad hanc | "As regards this woman" - impotent only with one's own wife/partner |
| Type | Psychological/psychogenic impotence |
| Significance | Grounds for annulment/divorce if proven to exist before marriage |
| Key point | The man can be potent with other women but not his wife - due to psychological aversion/dislike |
Find landmark cases on impotence quoad hanc in Indian law
Posthumous child
These are two separate questions - I'll handle both simultaneously.
Searching sources...
Searching the Web
landmark cases impotence quoad hanc Indian law divorce annulment
Finding Sources
Reading File
Searching the Web
Patel v Madgavkar "quoad hanc" impotence India case law Hindu Marriage Act annulment
Reading Web Page
https://restthecase.com/knowledge-bank/non-consummation-of-m…
Reading File
I now have sufficient material for both questions. Here are comprehensive answers to both:
PART 1: Landmark Cases on Impotence Quoad Hanc in Indian Law
Legal Framework
Under Section 12(1)(a), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a marriage is voidable (can be annulled) if it has not been consummated due to impotence of the respondent - which includes both physical AND psychological impotence (which includes quoad hanc).
Landmark Cases
1. Yuvraj Digvijay Sinhji v. Yuvrani Pratap Kumari (Supreme Court)
Facts: The husband sought annulment on the ground that the marriage had not been consummated due to the wife's impotence.
Held: The Supreme Court definitively clarified that impotency under the Hindu Marriage Act means the practical impossibility of performing complete sexual intercourse. Crucially, the Court held that impotence can be physical OR psychological. If a spouse suffers from "invincible repugnance" to the sexual act with the other spouse - that is, a deep psychological aversion specific to their partner - it constitutes psychological impotence (quoad hanc) and is a valid ground for annulment.
This is the leading case that gave judicial recognition to the concept of quoad hanc in Indian matrimonial law.
2. Rita Nijhawan v. Bal Kishan Nijhawan (Delhi High Court, 1973)
Facts: The wife sought annulment under S.12(1)(a) HMA on grounds that the husband was impotent and the marriage had never been consummated. The marriage was in 1954 and the petition was filed in 1967 - a gap of 13 years.
Held: The Delhi High Court ruled that a delay in filing the petition cannot by itself be a reason to deny relief. The court granted the decree of nullity, establishing that non-consummation due to impotence - even after a long delay - remains a valid ground. The ruling reinforced that the inability to consummate directly strikes at the foundation of the marital relationship.
3. Shakuntala v. Om Prakash (1980)
Facts: The husband sought annulment claiming the wife was impotent at the time of marriage and remained so.
Held: The court emphasized that the burden of proving impotence lies heavily on the petitioner. If a party refuses to submit to medical examination when asked by the court or the other side, the court is entitled to draw an "adverse inference" - i.e., presume the allegation of impotence is true. This established the evidentiary rule for quoad hanc cases where the impotent party refuses examination.
4. Samar Roy Chowdhury v. Snigdha Roy Chowdhury (Samar Som v. Snigdha)
Facts: The nullity petition was filed after more than 10 years of marriage.
Held: There are no hard and fast rules regarding the time frame within which nullity suits must be brought. The question of nullity of the petition on grounds of delay was denied.
5. Laxmi Devi v. Babulal
Facts: The wife had no vagina at all (vaginal agenesis). A surgical artificial vagina was later formed.
Held: The husband was entitled to a decree of nullity - the original physical incapacity to consummate at the time of marriage was a ground for annulment under S.12(1)(a) HMA.
6. Patel v. Madgavkar (cited in Parikh's Forensic Medicine)
This Indian case is specifically cited in forensic medicine texts for the concept of quoad hanc. The husband was found to be impotent as regards his wife, although he was generally potent with other women. This is the textbook illustration of quoad hanc - selective, partner-specific (psychogenic) impotence.
Key Legal Principles on Quoad Hanc
| Principle | Rule |
|---|---|
| Type of impotence covered | Both physical AND psychological (quoad hanc) |
| "Invincible repugnance" | Psychological inability specific to one's partner = impotence |
| Timing | Must exist at time of marriage AND at time of filing petition |
| Delay | Not automatically fatal to the petition |
| Medical examination | Refusal to undergo = adverse inference drawn |
| Burden of proof | On the petitioner |
| Subsequent cure | Does not bar annulment if impotence existed at time of marriage |
PART 2: Posthumous Child - According to Narayan Reddy
(Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 36th Ed., Ch. 16, p. 384)
Definition
"A posthumous child is a child born after the death of its father; the mother having been conceived by the said father."
- Narayan Reddy, 36th Ed.
A posthumous child is conceived during the father's lifetime but born after his death.
Medicolegal Importance / Legal Issues Involved
-
Legitimacy - Is the child legitimate? The answer is yes, provided it can be proven the child was conceived by the deceased father during his lifetime.
-
Inheritance of property - The posthumous child has the right to inherit the deceased father's property. The question of which child was born first (if there is a dispute) may have property implications.
-
Compensation cases - A posthumous child may be entitled to compensation if the father died due to the negligence of another person (e.g., motor accident). The child can claim as a dependent.
-
Slandering against the mother - A compensation case may arise if someone falsely accuses the mother of unchastity, implying the child is illegitimate.
Period of Gestation - Key Forensic Issue
For legitimacy of a posthumous child, the critical question is: Could the child have been conceived before the father's death?
This depends on the maximum period of gestation. Narayan Reddy notes:
- Normal gestation: 280 days (40 weeks)
- Maximum gestation quoted by some authors: 315 to 322 days
- The longer the gestation, the larger the infant
If the father died more than ~322 days before the child's birth, the child cannot legitimately be his.
Related Concepts (from Narayan Reddy)
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Posthumous child | Born after death of father, conceived by him |
| Superfecundation | Two ova fertilized by two separate acts of coitus (possibly by different men) in same cycle |
| Superfetation | Fertilization of a second ovum in a woman already pregnant |
| Supposititious child | A false/substituted child presented as legitimate |
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.