What's your opinion
Here is a clear breakdown of this echocardiography report for Kusma Devi Thapa, 72-year-old female, done at Province Hospital, Surkhet, Nepal.
Key Findings
LV Function
- LVEF: 65% - this is normal (normal ≥ 55%). Systolic function is well preserved.
- Wall motion: Normal - no regional wall motion abnormality, which argues against ischemic heart disease or prior infarction.
Valve Assessment
| Valve | Finding |
|---|---|
| Mitral (AML/PML) | Normal morphology, no regurgitation |
| Tricuspid | Normal morphology, trace TR (trivial - clinically insignificant) |
| Aortic | Normal morphology, no regurgitation |
| Pulmonary | Normal morphology, no regurgitation |
- No stenosis documented for any valve.
- No clots, no vegetations - rules out infective endocarditis on echo.
Other
- Pericardium: No effusion - no tamponade risk.
- IVC Diameter: 1.9 cm - this is mildly dilated (normal < 2.1 cm). At 1.9 cm it is borderline; the collapsibility with inspiration was not documented here. If collapsibility is <50%, it could suggest mildly elevated right atrial pressure (~10-15 mmHg), but this finding alone is not alarming.
- Normal-sized cardiac chambers - no cardiomegaly.
Limitation
- Poor echo window - the sonographer noted acoustic limitations, meaning some measurements (LVID, IVS, LVPW, E/A ratio, peak velocities) were not fully recorded. This reduces confidence in completeness of the study.
Overall Impression
This is largely a reassuring echo for a 72-year-old woman:
- Normal LV systolic function (EF 65%)
- No significant valvular disease
- No structural abnormality (no effusion, no vegetations, no clots)
- Trace TR is a normal variant in the elderly and has no clinical significance on its own
Points to Note
-
Diastolic function cannot be fully assessed because E peak, A peak, and E/A ratio were not filled in (likely due to the poor window). In a 72-year-old, diastolic dysfunction (Grade I-II) would be common and clinically relevant, especially if the patient has symptoms like exertional dyspnoea or orthopnoea. A repeat echo or tissue Doppler assessment would be useful if symptoms suggest heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
-
The IVC at 1.9 cm warrants noting - if the patient has leg swelling, elevated JVP, or fluid retention, this borderline IVC size should be correlated clinically.
-
Given the poor echo window, if clinical suspicion remains high for any cardiac condition, consider repeating with a contrast echo or referring for cardiac MRI.
Bottom line: No major structural or functional cardiac abnormality on this study. The heart appears structurally intact with good systolic function. The main gap is incomplete diastolic function data due to technical limitations, which should be correlated with the clinical picture.
This analysis is for educational/informational purposes only. Clinical decisions should be made by the treating physician in context of the full patient history.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.