I now have comprehensive material from multiple authoritative sources. Here are the full detailed notes:
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS) - Detailed Notes
1. Definition and Core Concept
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS) is a surgical philosophy that prioritizes avoidance of a complete median sternotomy. Surgical repair is accomplished via one or more smaller chest incisions - such as:
- Thoracotomy (anterolateral mini-thoracotomy)
- Mini-sternotomy
- Transverse sternotomy
MICS can be performed:
- With or without CPB
- With or without robotic assistance
- With or without endoscopic techniques
The overall goal is to reduce surgical trauma while achieving the same therapeutic outcomes as conventional open-heart surgery.
2. Procedures Achievable via MICS
| Procedure | MICS Approach |
|---|
| Myocardial revascularization (CABG) | MIDCAB, OPCAB, TECAB |
| Mitral valve repair/replacement | Right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy, robotic |
| Aortic valve replacement | Right anterior mini-thoracotomy (4th ICS) |
| Tricuspid valve surgery | Mini-thoracotomy |
| Atrial septal defect closure | Mini-thoracotomy |
| Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation | MICS approach |
| Percutaneous valve replacement/repair | TAVR, MitraClip (selected high-risk patients) |
3. Suggested Benefits of MICS
- Less postoperative pain
- Decreased scarring
- Shorter recovery times and earlier discharge
- Decreased blood product transfusions (especially OPCAB)
- Reduced renal injury (off-pump approaches)
- Fewer wound complications
- Shorter ICU and hospital length of stay (especially robotic MIMVS)
4. MICS for Myocardial Revascularization
4A. MIDCAB - Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass
Definition: Off-pump CABG performed through a small chest incision (not full sternotomy), without CPB.
Approach:
- Limited left anterolateral thoracotomy (4th or 5th left intercostal space)
- Patient positioned supine with 30-degree elevation of the left hemithorax, left arm tucked
- Chest and groins are prepped in case of emergency conversion to sternotomy/femoral-femoral bypass
Surgical steps:
- Pericardium opened to visualize the LAD through the thoracotomy
- LIMA (Left Internal Mammary Artery) dissected and harvested
- Heparin administered - target ACT >300 seconds
- LIMA-to-LAD anastomosis performed on the beating heart
- Myocardial stabilizer devices (pure pressure or vacuum-assisted) used to stabilize the anastomotic site
- Protamine administered, hemostasis achieved
- Left pleural chest tube placed, thoracotomy closed
Key features:
- Primarily for single or double-vessel disease (usually isolated LAD)
- No CPB required
- No aortic cross-clamping
Anesthetic considerations:
- Left lung isolation mandatory (double-lumen endotracheal tube or bronchial blocker) to allow surgical exposure of LIMA
- Standard ASA monitors + arterial line (radial artery preferred) + central line + ± PA catheter
- Induction same as standard CABG
- Maintenance must account for off-pump physiology - hemodynamic control via fluids and vasopressors
- Norepinephrine and phenylephrine both used effectively
- External defibrillator/pacing pads placed before draping (surgical access to heart is limited)
- No CPB-related hemodilution or inflammatory response
Outcomes:
- MIDCAB associated with less morbidity and mortality vs. on-pump and off-pump CABG
- Operative mortality ~1% in large series; 3-year mortality 3.1% (single-vessel disease)
- Meta-analysis of 12 RCTs vs. PCI: comparable mortality and MI rates, but lower revascularization requirement with MIDCAB
4B. OPCAB - Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass
Definition: CABG performed through a conventional median sternotomy, but on the beating heart without CPB.
Approach:
- Full median sternotomy
- LIMA and other conduits harvested for multiarterial grafting
- Heparin to target ACT ~300 seconds
Surgical steps:
- Generous pericardiotomy to allow cardiac mobilization
- LAD grafting (anterior) is performed first (most accessible)
- Inferior and lateral wall vessels require "verticalization" - lifting the heart apex to the zenith
- In verticalized position, forward ejection and stroke volume are compromised
- Suction devices achieve and maintain verticalization
- Stabilization devices (Octopus/Medtronic, Ultima II/Guidant, Acrobat-i/Macquet) compress the ventricles locally to create a still anastomotic field
- Epicardial pacing wires placed before cardiac manipulation - pace to 80 bpm to increase stroke volume
- Intracoronary shunts used to mitigate ischemia during coronary occlusion
- Grafting order: anterior → inferior → lateral wall vessels
Emergency conversion:
- Technical difficulty or refractory hemodynamic instability → abandon OPCAB → conventional CPB
- Must have CPB and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) immediately available
Anesthetic considerations (Table 39-21 summary):
| Issue | Management |
|---|
| Monitoring | Invasive arterial BP, CVP, TEE (essential), consider PAC if poor LV function or severe MR |
| Temperature | Normothermia - warming devices, heated circuits, optimize OR temperature |
| Hemodynamic compromise (verticalization, stabilizer application) | Trendelenburg, volume, vasopressors; anticipate and treat proactively |
| RV dysfunction | Watch closely - leads to refractory instability; may need MCS |
| Emergency preparedness | CPB and MCS must be immediately available |
| ECG/TEE limitations | May not detect ischemia during cardiac mobilization/verticalization |
Outcomes:
- Trend toward decreased perioperative blood transfusions vs. on-pump CABG
- Higher incomplete revascularization rates
- Technically challenging - outcomes vary widely by surgeon skill
- Stroke rates similar to on-pump CABG despite absence of CPB emboli
- The ROOBY trial showed increased adverse cardiac events with OPCAB vs. conventional CABG
- Cochrane review (Moller et al): no significant benefit in mortality, stroke, or MI; better long-term survival seen in on-pump CABG group
- OPCAB remains <20% of all CABG procedures in the United States
4C. TECAB - Total Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass
Definition: The most minimally invasive CABG approach - performed entirely through a few port sites, using a robotic system (surgeon remotely controls the ports).
Three variations:
- Arrested-heart TECAB - heart arrested; uses endoaortic occlusion balloon clamp (EAOBC)
- Beating-heart TECAB with CPB - heart beating on CPB support
- Beating-heart TECAB without CPB - fully off-pump, fully robotic
EAOBC (Endoaortic Occlusion Balloon Clamp):
- Placed via femoral vessels (or axillary artery if femoral/descending aorta is contraindicated)
- Acts as an endovascular cross-clamp - replaces the need for external aortic cross-clamping
- TEE guidance is essential for accurate EAOBC placement
Anesthetic note:
- Defibrillation pads placed preoperatively (no direct access to heart during surgery)
- Due to CO2 pneumothorax used for exposure: transthoracic electrical impedance increases - higher defibrillation energy needed
- Chest cavity may need to be deflated to improve defibrillation threshold
- Communication between surgical and anesthesia teams is critical
4D. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (HCR)
Definition: Combines MICS surgical technique (MIDCAB or TECAB) with PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) in the same or staged procedure.
Rationale: Uses the best of both techniques:
- Durable LIMA-to-LAD bypass graft (surgically, via MICS)
- Treat other stenoses with drug-eluting stent PCI
- Avoids large incision or CPB
Advantages:
- No full sternotomy or CPB
- Durable LAD revascularization
- Shorter hospital stay vs. OPCAB (small studies)
Disadvantages:
- Requires aggressive antiplatelet therapy (for PCI) which may increase surgical hemorrhagic complications
- Higher rates of reintervention reported in some studies
- Not widely accepted; clinical value remains debated
5. MICS for Valvular Surgery
5A. Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery
Approach: Right-sided anterolateral mini-thoracotomy
Evolution: Initially via mini-thoracotomy; now predominantly robotic using 5 small port incisions (da Vinci System)
Robotic MIMVS (R-MIMVS) - da Vinci System:
Patient positioning:
- Right shoulder elevated 30 degrees, pelvis remains supine (to allow femoral vessel access)
Surgical steps:
- One-lung ventilation (OLV) established for right lung isolation
- CO2 insufflation of right hemithorax
- Trocars introduced into 4th or 5th intercostal space
- Robot docked after exposure achieved
- CPB via femoral cannulae (peripheral CPB - femoral artery + femoral vein)
- Additional venous drainage via right internal jugular vein (superior vena cava cannula) for optimal right heart drainage
- Cardioplegia delivered into coronary vasculature
- Ascending aorta cross-clamped
- Mitral valve repaired or replaced
- TEE used to evaluate valve function after replacement
- Aortic cross-clamp removed, weaned from CPB
- Double-lumen ETT exchanged for single-lumen ETT if patient remains intubated
Exclusion criteria for robotic mitral valve repair:
- Severely calcified mitral annulus
- Severe pulmonary hypertension
- Ischemic heart disease
- Surgery requiring multiple valve repairs
- Previous surgery to the right hemithorax
- Severe aortic and peripheral atherosclerosis
Anesthetic considerations:
- OLV mandatory - double-lumen ETT or bronchial blocker
- CO2 pneumothorax causes increased pulmonary vascular resistance - poorly tolerated in patients with pre-existing mitral valve-induced pulmonary hypertension
- Optimize volume; prevent tachyarrhythmias and hypoxia during OLV
- TEE essential throughout - guides CPB cannula placement, valve assessment, de-airing, weaning
Outcomes:
- MIMVS is effective and safe
- Associated with fewer long-term and short-term complications
- Shorter ICU and hospital length of stay vs. conventional open mitral surgery
5B. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement
Approach: Right anterior mini-thoracotomy, just lateral to the sternum in the 4th intercostal space
Key features:
- Anterior position of AV in thorax allows access through a 3-cm incision
- Right lung isolation required (same as mitral MICS)
- Peripheral CPB required (femoral cannulation)
- Superior vena cava (SVC) cannula via right IJV NOT required (unlike mitral MICS) - because the AV is positioned anteriorly, complete right heart drainage is not needed for visualization
6. Peripheral CPB in MICS
Because MICS uses small incisions without full sternal opening, central cannulation (direct aortic/RA) is not possible in most cases. Therefore:
- Femoral artery - arterial return cannula
- Femoral vein - primary venous drainage
- Right internal jugular vein - SVC cannula for additional drainage (mandatory in mitral MICS, not needed in AV MICS)
- TEE guides cannula positioning and checks for adequate drainage
7. Lung Isolation in MICS
MICS via thoracotomy requires access to the right hemithorax - the right lung must be collapsed for surgical exposure. Options:
- Double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) - preferred by most cardiac anesthesiologists for MIDCAB and MICS
- Single-lumen ETT with bronchial blocker - alternative
After robotic MIMVS, if the patient is left intubated, the DLT is exchanged for a single-lumen ETT in the ICU.
8. Monitoring Requirements for MICS
| Monitor | Indication |
|---|
| Invasive arterial line (radial artery) | All MICS cases |
| Central venous catheter/introducer | All MICS cases |
| PA catheter | Poor LV function, severe MR |
| TEE | Essential in all MICS - guides cannulation, valve assessment, de-airing, weaning |
| External defibrillation/pacing pads | Placed pre-draping (limited access to heart) |
| ECG | Standard - note limitations during cardiac mobilization |
9. Conversion to Conventional Surgery
Always prepare for emergency conversion in any MICS case:
- Chest and groins prepped for possible sternotomy + femoral-femoral bypass
- Systemic heparin prepared and immediately available
- CPB standby team ready
- Indications for conversion: Hemodynamic collapse, technical failure, uncontrolled bleeding, inability to complete revascularization/repair
10. Summary Comparison
| Feature | MIDCAB | OPCAB | TECAB | MICS Valve |
|---|
| Incision | Left mini-thoracotomy | Median sternotomy | Port sites only | Right mini-thoracotomy or ports |
| CPB | No | No | ± (arrested/beating) | Yes (peripheral femoral) |
| Aortic cross-clamp | No | No | ± (EAOBC) | Yes |
| Vessels | Single (LAD) | Multi-vessel | Single/multi | N/A |
| Lung isolation | Yes (left) | No | Yes (bilateral) | Yes (right) |
| Robotic | Possible | No | Yes (da Vinci) | Yes (da Vinci) |
| TEE | Yes | Essential | Essential | Essential |
Sources: Barash Clinical Anesthesia, 9e; Miller's Anesthesia, 10e; Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 11e