Types of study design

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"Research Design"[MeSH Terms]

Searching the Web

types of epidemiological study designs CDC observational experimental

Types of study design

Research studies are broadly classified into observational and experimental (interventional) studies. Reviews of existing research are usually considered separately.

1. Observational studies

The researcher does not assign an exposure or treatment. They observe what occurs naturally.
DesignWhat it doesTypical use
Case reportDetailed description of one unusual patient/eventIdentifies a new or rare condition, adverse effect, or presentation
Case seriesDescribes several similar cases, without a comparison groupGenerates hypotheses
Cross-sectional studyMeasures exposure and outcome at one point in timeEstimates prevalence, such as prevalence of hypertension in a community
Case-control studyBegins with people who have the outcome (cases) and compares prior exposures with controls without itUseful for rare diseases or diseases with long latency; usually produces an odds ratio
Cohort studyBegins with exposed and unexposed groups and follows them for outcome occurrenceMeasures incidence and relative risk; can be prospective or retrospective
Ecological studyUses data for groups or populations rather than individualsUseful for population-level hypotheses but prone to ecological fallacy
Cohort study subtypes
  • Prospective cohort: exposure is measured now and participants are followed into the future.
  • Retrospective cohort: existing records are used to reconstruct exposure and follow-up.
  • Ambispective cohort: includes both retrospective and prospective components.

2. Experimental or interventional studies

The researcher assigns an intervention, such as a drug, vaccine, or health education program.
DesignMain feature
Randomized controlled trial (RCT)Participants are randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. Best design for assessing treatment efficacy and causal effects.
Non-randomized controlled trial / quasi-experimental studyIntervention is assigned but randomization is absent.
Before-and-after studyOutcomes are measured before and after an intervention in the same group.
Crossover trialEach participant receives more than one treatment in sequence, usually with a washout period.
Cluster randomized trialGroups, such as villages, schools, or hospitals, are randomized rather than individual participants.
Community trial / field trialAn intervention is tested in a community or healthy population, often for prevention.

3. Secondary research designs

These evaluate already published evidence rather than recruit new participants.
  • Narrative review: non-systematic summary of literature.
  • Systematic review: structured, reproducible search, selection, appraisal, and synthesis of studies.
  • Meta-analysis: statistical pooling of results from comparable studies, often performed within a systematic review.
  • Clinical practice guideline: recommendations based on systematic evidence review plus assessment of benefits, harms, and feasibility.

Quick classification diagram

Research studies
│
├── Primary studies
│   ├── Observational
│   │   ├── Descriptive: case report, case series, cross-sectional, ecological
│   │   └── Analytical: case-control, cohort
│   │
│   └── Interventional
│       ├── Randomized controlled trial
│       └── Non-randomized / quasi-experimental trial
│
└── Secondary studies
    ├── Systematic review
    └── Meta-analysis

High-yield comparison

  • Cross-sectional: “What is present now?” Measures prevalence.
  • Case-control: “What exposure may have led to this disease?” Best for rare outcomes.
  • Cohort: “Does exposure lead to disease over time?” Best for measuring incidence and risk.
  • RCT: “Does an intervention cause improvement?” Strongest primary design for treatment effects.
A concise overview of these categories and their uses is available in this study-design review.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.