Incisional hernia, definition, classification case performa indetail

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"incisional hernia" AND classification

Searching the Web

European Hernia Society midline incisional hernia classification definition guidelines

Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading Web Page

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10638550

Searching Images

incisional hernia clinical abdominal wall diagram fascial defect

Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources

Incisional hernia

Definition

An incisional hernia is a protrusion of a peritoneal sac, with or without abdominal viscera, through a defect in the musculofascial layers of the abdominal wall at the site of a previous operative incision or port site. The skin scar may remain intact.
It can occur after laparotomy, laparoscopic port placement, drain-site incision, stoma closure, or trauma to a previously healed scar.
Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th ed., p. 1098.
Large incisional hernia involving a midline scar

Classification

1. Etiological classification

  1. Primary incisional hernia
    • First hernia occurring through a previous operative scar.
  2. Recurrent incisional hernia
    • Hernia recurring after a prior operative repair.
  3. Port-site hernia
    • Incisional hernia through a laparoscopic trocar site.
  4. Parastomal hernia
    • Incisional defect adjacent to an intestinal or urinary stoma. Usually classified separately.

2. Classification by anatomical site

A. Midline incisional hernia

  • Upper midline
  • Epigastric
  • Umbilical
  • Infraumbilical
  • Suprapubic

B. Lateral incisional hernia

  • Subcostal
  • Flank
  • Iliac
  • Lumbar
  • Oblique scar
  • Transverse scar
  • Pfannenstiel scar

3. European Hernia Society (EHS) classification of incisional hernia

This is a useful standardized classification for documentation, research, and operative planning. It records:
  1. Site of defect
  2. Width of defect
  3. Recurrence status

A. Midline location: M classification

CodeLocation
M1Subxiphoidal: xiphoid to 3 cm above umbilicus
M2Epigastric: 3 cm above umbilicus to 3 cm above umbilicus
M3Umbilical: 3 cm above to 3 cm below umbilicus
M4Infraumbilical: 3 cm below umbilicus to 3 cm above pubis
M5Suprapubic: pubis to 3 cm above pubis
Note: M2 and M3 are best remembered by their relation to the umbilicus. In practice, document the exact superior and inferior extent in centimetres as well.

B. Lateral location: L classification

CodeLocation
L1Subcostal
L2Flank
L3Iliac
L4Lumbar

C. Defect width: W classification

CodeMaximum transverse fascial defect width
W1< 4 cm
W24-10 cm
W3> 10 cm

D. Recurrence: R classification

CodeMeaning
R0Primary incisional hernia, no previous repair
R1First recurrence
R2Second recurrence
R3Third or further recurrence
Example:
A first-time infraumbilical midline incisional hernia, 7 cm wide, is documented as:
M4 W2 R0.
The EHS system was developed to make descriptions of abdominal-wall hernias consistent across studies and clinical practice. The EHS midline hernia guideline supports CT or MRI for preoperative planning when repair is being considered.

Other useful clinical classifications

4. Classification according to reducibility and complications

  • Reducible
  • Irreducible or incarcerated
  • Obstructed
  • Strangulated
  • Inflamed or ulcerated

5. Classification by contents

  • Omentocele
  • Enterocele, containing small bowel
  • Colocele, containing colon
  • Richter-type hernia, where only part of bowel circumference is entrapped
  • Sliding hernia, where a viscus forms part of sac wall

6. Classification by size

Although not universal, clinically it may be described as:
  • Small: < 5 cm
  • Medium: 5-10 cm
  • Large: > 10 cm
  • Giant or loss-of-domain hernia: very large defect with a substantial proportion of viscera permanently residing outside the abdominal cavity.

Incisional Hernia Case Proforma

A. Identification data

  • Name:
  • Age:
  • Sex:
  • Occupation:
  • Address:
  • Hospital number:
  • Date of admission:
  • Date of examination:
  • Informant and reliability:

B. Chief complaints

Record duration of each symptom.
  1. Swelling over previous abdominal operative scar for ___ months/years.
  2. Pain or dragging sensation over swelling for ___ duration.
  3. Swelling increasing on coughing or straining for ___ duration.
  4. Difficulty in reducing swelling for ___ duration.
  5. Vomiting, abdominal distension, constipation, or inability to pass flatus for ___ duration.
  6. Ulceration, skin discoloration, or discharge over swelling for ___ duration.

C. History of present illness

1. Onset and progression

Ask:
  • When was the swelling first noticed?
  • Did it appear soon after surgery or after an interval?
  • Was onset sudden or gradual?
  • Has it progressively increased in size?
  • Is it related to coughing, lifting weights, straining during defecation, micturition, or physical work?
  • Does it reduce spontaneously on lying down?

2. Pain

  • Site and nature: dull dragging pain, aching, colicky pain, severe continuous pain.
  • Relation to exertion, standing, meals, cough, and posture.
  • Sudden severe pain may indicate incarceration, obstruction, or strangulation.

3. Reducibility

  • Is the swelling completely reducible?
  • Does it reduce on lying down?
  • Is manual pressure needed?
  • Any history of irreducibility?

4. Features of intestinal obstruction

Ask specifically about:
  • Colicky abdominal pain
  • Vomiting
  • Abdominal distension
  • Constipation
  • Obstipation, inability to pass flatus or stool

5. Features suggesting strangulation

  • Sudden severe continuous pain
  • Tender irreducible swelling
  • Fever
  • Tachycardia
  • Vomiting
  • Skin erythema or discoloration over swelling
  • Toxic appearance

6. Previous operation details

This is the most important part of the history.
  • Indication for prior surgery:
  • Date of surgery:
  • Type of surgery:
  • Elective or emergency:
  • Open/laparoscopic/robotic procedure:
  • Type and site of incision:
    • Midline
    • Paramedian
    • Transverse
    • Subcostal
    • Pfannenstiel
    • Port site
    • Stoma site
  • Any re-laparotomy?
  • Any postoperative wound infection?
  • Wound dehiscence or burst abdomen?
  • Serosanguineous discharge around postoperative day 5-8?
  • Prolonged wound discharge?
  • Resuturing or secondary suturing?
  • Drain through the main wound?
  • Previous hernia repair?
  • Type of previous repair: anatomical repair, onlay mesh, sublay/retrorectus mesh, intraperitoneal mesh, laparoscopic IPOM, component separation.
  • Number of prior repairs and recurrence interval.

7. Predisposing factors

Ask for:
Patient-related factors
  • Obesity and recent weight gain
  • Smoking
  • Diabetes mellitus and glycaemic control
  • Malnutrition or hypoalbuminaemia
  • Anaemia
  • Chronic renal failure
  • Malignancy
  • Steroid use, chemotherapy, immunosuppressive treatment
  • Connective-tissue disease or collagen disorder
  • Advanced age
Factors increasing intra-abdominal pressure
  • Chronic cough, COPD, tuberculosis, bronchiectasis
  • Constipation
  • Prostatism or stricture urethra causing straining
  • Ascites
  • Repeated vomiting
  • Heavy manual work
  • Pregnancy
Wound and surgical factors
  • Surgical-site infection
  • Poor fascial closure
  • Emergency surgery
  • Peritonitis or intra-abdominal sepsis
  • Repeated abdominal operations
  • Tissue ischemia or excessive tension on closure.
Postoperative sepsis, obesity, smoking, diabetes, impaired healing, and immunosuppression are important risk factors. Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th ed., p. 1098.

D. Past history

  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Hypertension
  • COPD, asthma, tuberculosis
  • Chronic cough
  • Constipation
  • Urinary obstructive symptoms
  • Chronic liver disease, ascites
  • Renal disease
  • Malignancy
  • Previous tuberculosis
  • Previous abdominal surgeries
  • Previous hernia surgeries
  • History of wound infection or burst abdomen

E. Personal history

  • Appetite and weight loss
  • Bowel habits and constipation
  • Micturition and straining
  • Smoking, tobacco, alcohol
  • Occupation involving heavy lifting
  • Nutritional history

F. Drug and allergy history

  • Corticosteroids
  • Immunosuppressive drugs
  • Chemotherapy
  • Anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents
  • Antidiabetic treatment
  • Drug allergies

G. Family history

  • Hernias in family members
  • Known collagen vascular or connective-tissue disorders

Examination

1. General physical examination

  • General condition and nutritional status
  • Body mass index
  • Pallor, icterus, cyanosis, clubbing, lymphadenopathy, edema
  • Hydration
  • Pulse, blood pressure, temperature, respiratory rate
  • Signs of diabetes or chronic steroid use
  • Features of COPD or chronic cough
  • Evidence of chronic liver disease or ascites

2. Abdominal examination

A. Inspection

Examine with the patient standing first, then supine.
Record:
  • Site of previous scar
  • Scar type, length, direction, and quality
  • Location of swelling in relation to scar
  • Size and shape of swelling
  • Single or multiple swellings
  • Skin changes:
    • Scar
    • Dilated veins
    • Erythema
    • Ulceration
    • Excoriation
    • Pigmentation
    • Thin, shiny, atrophic skin
  • Visible peristalsis
  • Cough impulse
  • Whether swelling becomes prominent on standing, coughing, or raising the head and shoulders from supine position
  • Other scars, stomas, drain sites, sinuses, or fistulae
  • Divarication of recti

B. Palpation

Perform with warm hands and patient relaxed.
Assess:
  • Local temperature
  • Tenderness
  • Consistency
  • Surface and margins
  • Cough impulse
  • Expansile impulse on coughing
  • Reducibility:
    • Complete or partial
    • Spontaneous or manual
    • Gurgling on reduction suggests bowel
  • Defect:
    • Site
    • Number
    • Shape
    • Maximum transverse width in cm
    • Vertical length in cm
    • Margins, especially lower margin
  • Contents:
    • Omentum: doughy, non-gurgling
    • Bowel: soft, gurgling, may be resonant
  • Whether defect is narrow or wide
  • Whether there are multiple defects along the scar
Important: Measure the fascial defect, not merely the visible swelling. Record both width and length.

C. Percussion

  • Resonant: likely bowel-containing sac
  • Dull: likely omentum or fluid-containing sac

D. Auscultation

  • Bowel sounds over swelling may indicate bowel content.
  • High-pitched or exaggerated sounds may suggest intestinal obstruction.
  • Absent sounds with severe tenderness is concerning for strangulation or ileus.

E. Tests

  • Cough impulse: place fingers over swelling and ask patient to cough.
  • Head-raising test: with patient supine, ask them to lift head and shoulders. A hernia becomes more prominent due to contraction of abdominal muscles.
  • Reducibility test: gently attempt reduction only if there is no suspicion of strangulation.
  • Finger invagination test: not routinely useful in large incisional hernia, but may help identify a small scar defect.

F. Examination of other systems

  • Respiratory system for COPD/chronic cough
  • Cardiovascular assessment
  • Per rectal examination if constipation, bleeding, or obstruction is present
  • Digital rectal examination in elderly men with urinary symptoms
  • Examine all other hernial sites

Provisional diagnosis

Use a complete statement:
“A ___ year old male/female has a reducible/irreducible, uncomplicated/obstructed/strangulated incisional hernia through a previous ___ incision, with a defect measuring ___ cm × ___ cm, containing probable ___, classified as EHS ___, associated with ___ risk factors.”
Example:
“A 58-year-old obese woman with diabetes has a reducible infraumbilical midline incisional hernia following lower midline laparotomy, with a 7 cm transverse and 9 cm vertical fascial defect, containing bowel and omentum, without obstruction, classified as M4 W2 R0.”

Differential diagnosis

  • Divarication of recti
  • Lipoma of abdominal wall
  • Seroma
  • Chronic postoperative hematoma
  • Abdominal wall abscess
  • Stitch granuloma
  • Desmoid tumour
  • Abdominal wall neoplasm
  • Parastomal hernia
  • Spigelian hernia, depending on location
Divarication of recti differs from incisional hernia because there is widening of the linea alba but no true fascial defect or peritoneal sac.

Investigations

Routine preoperative tests

  • Complete blood count
  • Blood group and cross-match if indicated
  • Blood glucose and HbA1c
  • Renal function tests and electrolytes
  • Liver function tests, especially if ascites or malnutrition suspected
  • Serum albumin
  • Coagulation profile when indicated
  • Urine routine and culture where appropriate
  • ECG and chest radiograph based on age/comorbidity
  • Pulmonary function assessment if COPD is suspected

Hernia-specific investigations

1. Ultrasonography

Useful for:
  • Small, clinically equivocal defects
  • Dynamic assessment with Valsalva
  • Identifying superficial collections
Limitations: operator dependence and less accurate definition of complex, large, or multiple defects.

2. CT abdomen and pelvis with Valsalva if feasible

Preferred for large, recurrent, complex, obese, or potentially loss-of-domain hernias. It defines:
  • Fascial defect width and length
  • Number of defects
  • Hernial contents
  • Bowel adhesions or obstruction
  • Muscle quality
  • Previous mesh position
  • Loss of domain
  • Operative planning
The EHS guideline considers CT the most sensitive investigation where clinical examination is inconclusive, and advises CT or MRI for preoperative planning. A defect width above 8 cm may indicate that advanced abdominal-wall reconstruction techniques could be required. See the EHS guideline.

3. MRI

Consider when radiation should be avoided or CT is unsuitable. MRI with Valsalva can clarify an uncertain diagnosis.

Brief management outline for case presentation

Initial approach

  • Determine whether the hernia is uncomplicated, obstructed, or strangulated.
  • Correct dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, hyperglycaemia, anaemia, malnutrition, and respiratory infection.
  • Encourage smoking cessation and weight reduction where feasible.
  • Treat chronic cough, constipation, urinary obstruction, and ascites.
  • An abdominal binder may provide temporary symptomatic support but does not repair the defect.

Indications for urgent operation

  • Strangulation
  • Intestinal obstruction
  • Irreducibility with pain or tenderness
  • Peritonitis
  • Skin necrosis or impending rupture

Elective repair

Usually considered for:
  • Pain or activity limitation
  • Progressive enlargement
  • Recurrent obstruction
  • Cosmesis affecting quality of life
  • Large defect or poor skin condition
Modern repair usually involves mesh reinforcement with fascial closure where possible. The operative approach, mesh plane, and need for component separation depend on defect size, recurrence, contamination, patient comorbidity, and CT anatomy.
A recent systematic review of risk factors, PMID 40938743, reinforces that hernia risk is strongly related to incision and patient factors, but it does not change the standard EHS anatomical classification described above.

Write a history for 46 year old female with swelling on the lumbar region for 6 months not associated with pain and the swelling in more than 5cm, she had her right Kidney removed due to infection which she could not elaborate properly

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"lumbar hernia" AND incisional

Searching the Web

lumbar incisional hernia nephrectomy flank incision clinical presentation

History

A 46-year-old female presented with a swelling in the right lumbar region for the past 6 months. The swelling was initially small and has gradually increased in size to its present size, which is more than 5 cm. It is not associated with pain, tenderness, fever, or local redness.
There is no history of sudden increase in size of the swelling, irreducibility, abdominal distension, colicky abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation, or inability to pass flatus or stools. There is no history of ulceration, discharge, or skin changes over the swelling.
The patient gives a history of right nephrectomy in the past for an infection of the right kidney. However, she is unable to provide further details regarding the exact diagnosis, date of surgery, type of incision, postoperative period, or whether there was any wound infection, wound discharge, or wound dehiscence. The swelling is located in the region of the previous operative scar.
There is no history suggestive of chronic cough, constipation, difficulty in micturition, heavy weight lifting, or any condition causing raised intra-abdominal pressure. There is no history of similar swelling elsewhere or previous hernia repair.
This presentation is suggestive of a right lumbar incisional hernia following right nephrectomy, pending physical examination and imaging. Incisional lumbar hernia may occur after renal surgery, particularly following a flank incision. Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th ed., p. 1094.

Write it in exam presentation performa

Reading File

History Case Presentation

Madam/Sir, I present the history of a 46-year-old female, who presented with a swelling in the right lumbar region for 6 months.

Chief complaints

  • Swelling in the right lumbar region for 6 months.

History of presenting illness

The patient was apparently well 6 months ago, when she noticed a swelling in the right lumbar region. The swelling was initially small in size and gradually increased to attain the present size, which is more than 5 cm.
The swelling is not associated with pain. There is no history of fever, redness, local rise of temperature, ulceration, or discharge over the swelling.
There is no history of sudden increase in size, irreducibility, colicky abdominal pain, vomiting, abdominal distension, constipation, or obstipation. There is no history of features suggestive of intestinal obstruction or strangulation.
The swelling is present at the site of a previous right-sided lumbar/flank operative scar. The patient gives a past history of right kidney removal for an infection. However, she is unable to elaborate on the exact nature of renal infection, date of surgery, type of operation, duration of hospital stay, or details of the postoperative period. History regarding postoperative wound infection, wound discharge, wound gaping, or resuturing is not available.
There is no history of chronic cough, constipation, straining during micturition, heavy weight lifting, or any other cause of raised intra-abdominal pressure.

Past history

  • History of right nephrectomy for renal infection, details not available.
  • No known history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, tuberculosis, chronic respiratory illness, or chronic liver disease.
  • No previous history of hernia repair.

Personal history

  • Appetite: Normal.
  • Bowel habits: Regular. No constipation.
  • Bladder habits: Normal. No straining during micturition.
  • No history of smoking, alcohol intake, or heavy manual work.

Family history

  • No similar illness in family members.

Provisional diagnosis

Right lumbar incisional hernia following right nephrectomy, uncomplicated, with a swelling more than 5 cm in size.

Points to confirm on examination

  • Presence and site of right flank/lumbar operative scar
  • Size and exact location of swelling
  • Cough impulse and expansile nature
  • Reducibility and contents
  • Defect size and margins
  • Evidence of obstruction, strangulation, or associated abdominal-wall weakness
  • Examination of the left kidney and other hernial sites

Change in details she had surgery 1.5 years back , she is diabetic and uncontrolled, possible constipation problem

Reading File
Searching the Web

incisional hernia risk factors diabetes constipation wound healing

History Case Presentation

Madam/Sir, I present the history of a 46-year-old female who presented with swelling in the right lumbar region for 6 months.

Chief complaint

  • Swelling in the right lumbar region for 6 months.

History of presenting illness

The patient was apparently well 6 months ago, when she noticed a swelling in the right lumbar region, at the site of a previous operative scar. The swelling was initially small and gradually increased in size to its present size of more than 5 cm.
The swelling is not associated with pain. There is no history of fever, redness, local warmth, ulceration, or discharge over the swelling. There is no history of sudden increase in size, irreducibility, or episodes of acute pain.
There is no history of colicky abdominal pain, vomiting, abdominal distension, or obstipation. Thus, there are no symptoms suggestive of intestinal obstruction or strangulation at present.
The patient underwent right nephrectomy 1½ years ago for an infection involving the right kidney. She is unable to provide details regarding the exact diagnosis, indication, type of operation, incision used, or postoperative course. History of postoperative wound infection, discharge, wound gaping, or resuturing could not be elicited properly.
She is a known case of diabetes mellitus, which is currently poorly controlled. Details regarding duration of diabetes, medication compliance, and blood glucose values are not available.
There is a possible history of constipation, with occasional hard stools and straining during defecation. There is no history of chronic cough, difficulty in micturition, heavy weight lifting, or other significant causes of raised intra-abdominal pressure.

Past history

  • Right nephrectomy 1½ years ago for right renal infection, details not available.
  • Diabetes mellitus, poorly controlled.
  • Possible constipation.
  • No past history of hypertension, chronic respiratory disease, chronic liver disease, ascites, or tuberculosis.
  • No history of previous hernia repair.

Personal history

  • Appetite: Normal.
  • Bowel habits: History suggestive of constipation with occasional straining.
  • Bladder habits: No difficulty or straining during micturition.
  • Sleep: Normal.
  • No history of smoking, alcohol consumption, or heavy manual work.

Family history

  • No family history of similar swelling or hernia.

Provisional diagnosis

Right lumbar incisional hernia following right nephrectomy, uncomplicated, in a patient with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and constipation.

Risk factors in this patient

  1. Previous right flank/lumbar incision for nephrectomy
  2. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, which can impair wound healing
  3. Possible chronic straining due to constipation, causing raised intra-abdominal pressure

Points to be elicited/examined further

  • Exact site, type, and length of nephrectomy scar
  • Whether swelling has an expansile cough impulse
  • Reducibility and contents of swelling
  • Size of fascial defect and number of defects
  • Presence of bowel sounds over the swelling
  • Evidence of obstruction or strangulation
  • Glycaemic status: random blood sugar, fasting/postprandial glucose, HbA1c
  • CT abdomen for confirming defect, contents, and planning repair

History of lifting heavy weights

Add this in the history of presenting illness:
There is a history of lifting heavy weights regularly as part of her daily household/occupational activities. This may have contributed to increased intra-abdominal pressure and enlargement of the swelling.
Replace the relevant line with:
There is a possible history of constipation with occasional straining during defecation, and a history of regular heavy weight lifting. There is no history of chronic cough or straining during micturition.

Updated risk factors

  1. Previous right nephrectomy through a lumbar/flank incision
  2. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus
  3. Constipation with straining
  4. Regular lifting of heavy weights

Incision in transverse from umbilicus to right flank

Update the operative history as follows:
The patient underwent a right nephrectomy 1½ years ago for a right renal infection. The surgery was performed through a transverse incision extending from the umbilical region to the right flank. However, she is unable to give further details about the exact renal disease, operative procedure, or postoperative period.

Revised relevant portion of history

The swelling is present over the right lateral end of the previous transverse abdominal incision extending from the umbilicus to the right flank. This is suggestive of a right lateral incisional hernia rather than a primary lumbar hernia.

Revised provisional diagnosis

Right lateral incisional hernia through the lateral end of a previous transverse umbilico-flank incision, following right nephrectomy, uncomplicated, in a patient with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, constipation, and a history of heavy weight lifting.

Write the complete final case presentation in one format

Reading File

Final History Case Presentation

Madam/Sir, I present the history of a 46-year-old female who presented with a swelling over the right lumbar and flank region for 6 months.

Chief complaint

  • Swelling over the right lumbar/flank region for 6 months.

History of presenting illness

The patient was apparently well 6 months ago, when she first noticed a small swelling over the right lumbar and flank region, at the lateral end of a previous operative scar. The swelling gradually increased in size and is now more than 5 cm in its maximum dimension.
The swelling is painless. There is no history of fever, local redness, warmth, ulceration, skin discoloration, or discharge from the swelling. There is no history of sudden increase in size, acute pain, or inability to reduce the swelling.
There is no history of colicky abdominal pain, vomiting, abdominal distension, inability to pass flatus, or obstipation. Thus, there are no features suggestive of intestinal obstruction or strangulation at present.
The patient underwent surgery for removal of the right kidney approximately 1½ years ago, reportedly for infection of the right kidney. The operation was performed through a transverse incision extending from the umbilical region to the right flank. The patient is unable to provide further details regarding the exact renal diagnosis, indication for nephrectomy, duration of hospital stay, or postoperative events. History regarding wound infection, wound discharge, wound gaping, or resuturing is not clearly available.
She is a known case of diabetes mellitus, which is reportedly poorly controlled. Details regarding duration of diabetes, treatment taken, compliance, and blood glucose values are not available.
She gives a possible history of constipation, with occasional passage of hard stools and straining during defecation. She also gives a history of lifting heavy weights regularly. There is no history of chronic cough or difficulty/straining during micturition.

Past history

  • History of right nephrectomy 1½ years ago for renal infection, with details not available.
  • Known case of diabetes mellitus, poorly controlled.
  • Possible history of constipation.
  • No history suggestive of chronic respiratory disease or chronic cough.
  • No history of chronic liver disease or ascites.
  • No history of previous hernia repair.

Personal history

  • Appetite: To be elicited.
  • Bowel habits: Possible constipation with occasional straining.
  • Bladder habits: No history of difficulty or straining during micturition.
  • Sleep: To be elicited.
  • Diet: To be elicited.
  • History of heavy weight lifting is present.
  • Smoking and alcohol history: To be elicited.

Family history

  • No relevant family history of hernia or similar illness is available.

Summary

This is a 46-year-old female, a known case of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, with possible constipation and history of regular heavy weight lifting, who has a gradually progressive, painless swelling of more than 5 cm over the right flank/lumbar region for 6 months. The swelling is situated at the lateral end of a previous transverse umbilico-flank incision made for right nephrectomy 1½ years ago. There are no symptoms of intestinal obstruction or strangulation.

Provisional diagnosis

Right lateral incisional hernia through the lateral end of a previous transverse umbilico-flank incision following right nephrectomy, uncomplicated, in a patient with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, constipation, and a history of heavy weight lifting.

Risk factors in this patient

  1. Previous transverse abdominal incision extending to the right flank
  2. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, with impaired wound healing risk
  3. Possible constipation and straining
  4. Regular lifting of heavy weights, causing repeated rises in intra-abdominal pressure

Important points to confirm on examination

  • Exact location, length, and condition of the operative scar
  • Site and size of swelling and fascial defect
  • Cough impulse and expansile nature
  • Reducibility and likely contents
  • Presence of bowel sounds over the swelling
  • Number of defects and status of abdominal wall musculature
  • Evidence of obstruction or strangulation
  • Examination of other hernial sites
  • General assessment, including BMI and diabetic status.

Add the physical examination findings to this case presentation

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

incisional hernia physical examination cough impulse reducibility clinical examination

Searching PubMed

"incisional hernia" AND physical examination

Final Case Presentation

Madam/Sir, I present the case of a 46-year-old female who presented with a swelling over the right flank and lumbar region for 6 months.

Chief complaint

  • Swelling over the right flank/lumbar region for 6 months.

History of Presenting Illness

The patient was apparently well 6 months ago, when she noticed a small swelling over the right flank and lumbar region at the lateral end of a previous operative scar. The swelling gradually increased in size and is presently more than 5 cm in maximum dimension.
The swelling is painless. There is no history of fever, redness, local warmth, ulceration, skin discoloration, or discharge over the swelling. There is no history of sudden increase in size, acute pain, or irreducibility.
There is no history of colicky abdominal pain, vomiting, abdominal distension, or inability to pass stools and flatus. Hence, there are no symptoms suggestive of intestinal obstruction or strangulation.
The patient underwent right nephrectomy 1½ years ago, reportedly for infection of the right kidney. The surgery was performed through a transverse incision extending from the umbilical region to the right flank. However, the patient is unable to provide details regarding the exact renal disease, indication for surgery, duration of hospital stay, or postoperative course. History of postoperative wound infection, wound discharge, wound gaping, or resuturing could not be elicited properly.
She is a known diabetic, with poorly controlled blood glucose levels. Details regarding the duration of diabetes, treatment, and compliance are not available.
She gives a history suggestive of constipation, with occasional hard stools and straining during defecation. She also gives a history of regular heavy weight lifting. There is no history of chronic cough or straining during micturition.

Past History

  • History of right nephrectomy 1½ years ago for right renal infection.
  • Known case of diabetes mellitus, poorly controlled.
  • History suggestive of constipation.
  • No history of hypertension, chronic cough, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, tuberculosis, chronic liver disease, or ascites.
  • No history of previous hernia repair.

Personal History

  • Appetite: Normal.
  • Bowel habits: Occasional constipation with straining during defecation.
  • Bladder habits: Normal. No straining during micturition.
  • History of regular lifting of heavy weights is present.
  • Sleep: Normal.
  • No history of smoking or alcohol consumption.

Family History

No similar illness or hernia in the family.

Physical Examination

The following findings are appropriate for this case presentation. Replace the exact measurements and examination findings with those found in your patient.

General Physical Examination

The patient is conscious, cooperative, and moderately built and nourished.
  • No pallor, icterus, cyanosis, clubbing, lymphadenopathy, or pedal edema.
  • Pulse: ___/minute, regular.
  • Blood pressure: / mmHg.
  • Temperature: Afebrile.
  • Respiratory rate: ___/minute.
  • No clinical features of dehydration or sepsis.
  • Body mass index: ___ kg/m².
  • Features of poorly controlled diabetes such as skin infection, neuropathy, or diabetic foot should be specifically looked for.

Local Examination of Abdomen and Swelling

The patient should be examined first in standing position and then in supine position.

Inspection

  • Abdomen moves normally with respiration.
  • A healed transverse operative scar is present, extending from the umbilical region towards the right flank, consistent with the history of right nephrectomy.
  • A visible swelling is noted at the lateral end of this scar in the right flank/lumbar region.
  • The swelling is approximately more than 5 cm in maximum dimension. Record exact dimensions as ___ cm × ___ cm.
  • The swelling becomes more prominent on standing, coughing, and straining.
  • The overlying skin is normal, with no redness, ulceration, dilated veins, sinus, discharge, or visible peristalsis.
  • No other abdominal scars, sinuses, or visible swellings are noted.

Palpation

  • Local temperature is not raised.
  • The swelling is non-tender.
  • It is soft in consistency, with smooth surface and indistinct margins.
  • An expansile cough impulse is present.
  • The swelling is reducible completely or partially on gentle pressure in the supine position. If bowel is present, reduction may produce a gurgling sensation.
  • On reduction, a fascial defect is palpable at the lateral aspect of the scar. Its exact transverse and vertical dimensions should be recorded: ___ cm × ___ cm.
  • The defect margins are palpable and non-tender.
  • There is no local guarding, rigidity, or tenderness.

Percussion

  • The swelling is resonant if it contains bowel.
  • It may be dull if it predominantly contains omentum.

Auscultation

  • Bowel sounds may be audible over the swelling, suggesting bowel as a content.
  • No high-pitched bowel sounds are heard.
  • There are no findings suggestive of intestinal obstruction.

Rest of the Abdominal Examination

  • Abdomen is soft and non-tender.
  • No distension, organomegaly, ascites, or free fluid.
  • No other palpable abdominal mass.
  • All other hernial sites, including inguinal, femoral, umbilical, and previous scar sites, should be examined and documented as normal.
  • Per rectal examination may be done to assess constipation and exclude fecal loading, if indicated.

Systemic Examination

  • Respiratory system: Normal, with no evidence of chronic cough or COPD.
  • Cardiovascular system: Normal.
  • Central nervous system: Normal.
  • Left renal system: To be assessed clinically and by renal function tests, as the patient has a solitary left kidney.

Case Summary

This is a 46-year-old female, a known case of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, with a history of possible constipation and regular heavy weight lifting. She has a gradually progressive, painless swelling of more than 5 cm over the right flank/lumbar region for 6 months.
She had undergone a right nephrectomy 1½ years ago through a transverse incision extending from the umbilicus to the right flank. On local examination, there is a painless, reducible swelling at the lateral end of the previous scar, with an expansile cough impulse and a palpable fascial defect. There are no clinical features of intestinal obstruction or strangulation.

Provisional Diagnosis

Uncomplicated, reducible right lateral incisional hernia through the lateral end of a previous transverse umbilico-flank incision following right nephrectomy, in a patient with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, constipation, and history of heavy weight lifting.

Investigations to Plan

  1. Complete blood count and urine routine examination
  2. Fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, and HbA1c
  3. Renal function tests and serum electrolytes, especially important because she has one remaining kidney
  4. Serum albumin and nutritional assessment
  5. Ultrasound abdomen and abdominal-wall defect assessment
  6. CT abdomen and pelvis for defining the fascial defect, contents, number of defects, and operative planning
  7. ECG and chest radiograph if required for preoperative assessment
The clinical diagnosis remains provisional until confirmed by examination and imaging.

Any other tests and a possible list of differential diagnosis

Clinical tests

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

clinical examination tests incisional hernia cough impulse reducibility Valsalva

Clinical Tests for Right Lateral Incisional Hernia

Perform these tests after inspecting and palpating the swelling, preferably first with the patient standing and then supine.

1. Cough impulse test

  • Place the palm or fingertips over the swelling.
  • Ask the patient to cough.
  • Positive test: An expansile impulse is felt, supporting a hernia.
  • In this case, it is expected to be positive.

2. Valsalva manoeuvre

  • Ask the patient to take a deep breath and strain as if passing stool.
  • Observe and palpate the swelling.
  • Positive test: Swelling becomes more prominent and tense.
  • Useful in demonstrating a small or partially reducible hernia.

3. Reducibility test

  • Examine with the patient supine and relaxed.
  • Gently apply pressure over the swelling towards the defect.
  • Positive finding: Swelling reduces completely or partially.
    • A gurgling sensation suggests bowel content.
    • Smooth, doughy reduction suggests omental content.
  • After reduction, palpate the fascial defect and measure its transverse and vertical dimensions.
Do not attempt forceful reduction if the swelling is painful, tender, irreducible, or if obstruction/strangulation is suspected.

4. Head-raising or partial sit-up test

  • With the patient lying supine, ask her to raise her head and shoulders without using her arms.
  • This contracts the abdominal musculature and increases intra-abdominal pressure.
  • Positive finding: The swelling becomes more prominent, and the defect may be easier to define.
  • It also helps look for associated divarication of recti.

5. Defect palpation after reduction

  • Once the swelling is reduced, place fingertips over the scar defect.
  • Ask the patient to cough or strain.
  • Assess:
    • Number of defects
    • Size of each defect
    • Shape and margins
    • Whether margins are firm or tender
    • Impulse transmitted through the defect
This is important because more than one defect may be present along an incisional scar. Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th ed., p. 1099.

6. Auscultation over the swelling

  • Listen for bowel sounds.
  • Presence of bowel sounds supports bowel as a hernial content.
  • High-pitched, frequent bowel sounds with distension and vomiting may suggest obstruction.
  • Absence of bowel sounds alone does not diagnose strangulation.

7. Percussion

  • Resonant note: bowel-containing hernia.
  • Dull note: omentum, thick sac, or fluid-containing lesion.
  • This is supportive only and does not replace imaging.

8. Examination in different positions

  • Examine in:
    • Standing position
    • Supine position
    • During cough and Valsalva
  • A hernia generally becomes more evident on standing/straining and decreases or reduces when supine.

Examination Statement for Your Case

On local examination, a swelling of more than 5 cm is present at the lateral end of the healed transverse umbilico-right flank scar. It becomes prominent on standing, coughing, and Valsalva manoeuvre. The swelling is non-tender, has a positive expansile cough impulse, and is reducible on lying down. Following reduction, a fascial defect can be palpated at the lateral end of the scar. Percussion may be resonant and bowel sounds may be audible over the swelling, suggesting bowel content. There are no clinical signs of obstruction or strangulation.

Differential Diagnoses

  • Right lateral incisional hernia, most likely
  • Primary lumbar hernia
  • Postoperative flank bulge due to denervation or muscle paralysis, also called pseudohernia
  • Lipoma of the abdominal wall
  • Seroma or chronic postoperative collection
  • Chronic hematoma
  • Cold abscess, including tuberculous abscess
  • Abdominal-wall tumour, including desmoid tumour
A true incisional hernia has a palpable fascial defect, cough impulse, and often reducibility. A pseudohernia after renal surgery may cause flank bulging but lacks a true fascial defect.

Do the same for inguinal hernia with pain since six. Months male patient

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"inguinal hernia" AND diagnosis

Searching the Web

HerniaSurge international guidelines inguinal hernia diagnosis physical examination cough impulse deep ring tests

Reading File
Finding Sources

Inguinal Hernia: Complete Exam Case Presentation

Madam/Sir, I present the case of a ___-year-old male who presented with a swelling in the ___ inguinal region associated with pain for the past 6 months.
Use right or left according to the patient.

Chief Complaints

  1. Swelling in the ___ inguinal region for 6 months.
  2. Pain over the swelling for 6 months.

History of Presenting Illness

The patient was apparently well 6 months ago, when he first noticed a small swelling in the ___ groin region. The swelling was initially small and gradually increased in size to attain its present size.
The swelling becomes more prominent on standing, walking, coughing, straining, lifting heavy objects, and during defecation. It decreases in size or disappears on lying down. The patient may be able to reduce it manually or it may reduce spontaneously on lying down.
Pain is present over the swelling. It is dull aching or dragging in nature, mild to moderate in intensity, and increases on prolonged standing, walking, coughing, straining, and physical exertion. It is relieved by rest and lying down. There is no history of sudden severe pain.
There is no history of irreducibility of the swelling. There is no history of abdominal distension, colicky abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation, obstipation, or inability to pass flatus. Thus, there are no features suggestive of intestinal obstruction or strangulation at present.
There is no history of fever, redness, ulceration, or discharge over the swelling.
History of predisposing factors should be elicited:
  • Chronic cough, COPD, or smoking
  • Constipation and straining during defecation
  • Difficulty or straining during micturition, especially in elderly males with prostatism
  • Heavy weight lifting or strenuous work
  • Ascites
  • Previous abdominal surgery
  • Previous hernia repair
  • Family history of hernia

Past History

  • No past history of similar swelling or hernia repair.
  • No history of tuberculosis, chronic cough, COPD, or asthma.
  • No history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic liver disease, ascites, or malignancy.
  • No history of abdominal or pelvic surgery.
Add positive illnesses if present.

Personal History

  • Appetite: Normal.
  • Bowel habits: Regular/no constipation.
  • Bladder habits: Normal/no straining during micturition.
  • Sleep: Normal.
  • History of heavy weight lifting: Present/absent.
  • Smoking and alcohol history: Present/absent.

Family History

  • No family history of hernia or similar illness.

Physical Examination

General Physical Examination

The patient is conscious, cooperative, moderately built, and nourished.
  • Pulse: ___/minute, regular.
  • Blood pressure: / mmHg.
  • Temperature: Afebrile.
  • Respiratory rate: ___/minute.
  • No pallor, icterus, cyanosis, clubbing, generalized lymphadenopathy, or pedal edema.
  • Look specifically for chronic cough, obesity, ascites, and features of chronic liver disease.

Local Examination of Groin

Examine the patient in both standing and supine positions. Adequate exposure of both groins, external genitalia, and upper thighs is required.

Inspection

  • A swelling is seen in the ___ inguinal region.
  • Record its size: approximately ___ cm × ___ cm.
  • It may extend towards the scrotum in a complete indirect inguinal hernia.
  • The swelling becomes more prominent on coughing, standing, and straining.
  • The overlying skin is normal, without redness, edema, ulceration, or dilated veins.
  • Look for scars of previous operation and examine the opposite groin.

Palpation

  • Local temperature: Not raised.
  • Tenderness: Mild tenderness may be present because the patient has pain.
  • Consistency: Soft.
  • Surface: Smooth.
  • Margins: Usually well-defined, except at its base.
  • Cough impulse: Expansile cough impulse is present.
  • Reducibility: The swelling is reducible completely/partially on lying down with gentle pressure.
  • A gurgling sensation during reduction suggests bowel as content.
  • A doughy reduction suggests omentum as content.
  • After reduction, assess the superficial inguinal ring, posterior wall, and deep ring.

Percussion

  • Resonant if bowel is present as content.
  • Dull if the sac contains omentum.

Auscultation

  • Bowel sounds may be audible over the swelling if it contains intestine.
  • High-pitched bowel sounds in association with pain, vomiting, and distension suggest obstruction.

Examination of External Genitalia

  • Examine both testes separately.
  • Note whether the swelling can be got above.
  • Look for hydrocele, varicocele, epididymo-orchitis, and testicular tumour.
  • In an inguinoscrotal hernia, it may not be possible to get above the swelling.

Clinical Tests

1. Cough impulse test

Place the hand over the swelling and ask the patient to cough.
Positive finding: An expansile impulse is felt over the swelling, supporting a diagnosis of hernia.

2. Reducibility test

With the patient supine, gently reduce the swelling towards the deep inguinal ring.
Positive finding: The swelling reduces completely or partially. After reduction, the defect and inguinal canal are examined.
Do not attempt forceful reduction in a tender, irreducible swelling or when obstruction/strangulation is suspected.

3. Deep ring occlusion test

This test helps distinguish an indirect from a direct inguinal hernia.
Method:
  1. Reduce the hernia completely.
  2. Identify the deep inguinal ring, about 1.25 cm above the midpoint of the inguinal ligament.
  3. Apply firm pressure over the deep ring.
  4. Ask the patient to cough or stand.
Interpretation:
  • Swelling does not reappear while pressure is maintained: suggests an indirect inguinal hernia.
  • Swelling reappears despite deep ring occlusion: suggests a direct inguinal hernia.
This is not always reliable in large hernias.

4. Invagination test

This is performed to assess the superficial inguinal ring.
Method:
  • Invaginate the scrotal skin with the little finger and advance it upwards along the spermatic cord towards the superficial inguinal ring.
  • Ask the patient to cough.
Interpretation:
  • Impulse felt on the pulp of the finger may support an indirect hernia.
  • Impulse felt on the side of the finger may support a direct hernia.
This test is not fully reliable and should not be the sole basis for distinguishing direct and indirect hernia.

5. Zieman's three-finger test

Place:
  • Index finger over the deep inguinal ring
  • Middle finger over the superficial inguinal ring
  • Ring finger over the femoral canal
Ask the patient to cough.
Interpretation:
  • Impulse under index finger: indirect inguinal hernia
  • Impulse under middle finger: direct inguinal hernia
  • Impulse under ring finger: femoral hernia
This test is of academic value and may be unreliable in obese patients or large hernias.

6. “Get above the swelling” test

  • In an inguinal or inguinoscrotal hernia, it may not be possible to get above the swelling if it extends into the scrotum.
  • In a hydrocele, one can usually get above the swelling.

Rest of Abdominal Examination

  • Abdomen is soft and non-tender.
  • No abdominal distension, organomegaly, free fluid, or palpable mass.
  • Examine the umbilicus, femoral regions, opposite inguinal region, and all previous surgical scars for other hernias.
  • Per rectal examination should be considered in older patients or those with constipation and urinary symptoms, to evaluate fecal loading or prostatic enlargement.

Systemic Examination

  • Respiratory system: Assess for chronic cough/COPD.
  • Cardiovascular system: Routine preoperative assessment.
  • Per abdomen: Look for ascites and abdominal masses.
  • Genitourinary system: Assess for urinary obstruction/prostatism if relevant.

Case Summary

This is a ___-year-old male with a progressively increasing swelling in the ___ inguinal region for 6 months, associated with dull aching/dragging pain. The swelling increases on standing, coughing, and straining, and reduces on lying down. On examination, it is a soft, reducible groin swelling with an expansile cough impulse, with no evidence of intestinal obstruction or strangulation.

Provisional Diagnosis

Uncomplicated, reducible ___ inguinal hernia, likely indirect/direct, with pain for 6 months.
The distinction between direct and indirect inguinal hernia is often made intraoperatively. Inguinal hernias are usually diagnosed clinically; imaging is reserved for equivocal cases, as stated in the HerniaSurge guidelines. Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th ed., p. 1074.

Differential Diagnosis of Inguinal Swelling

  1. Femoral hernia
    • Usually below and lateral to the pubic tubercle.
    • More common in females.
  2. Hydrocele
    • Scrotal swelling.
    • Usually fluctuant and transilluminant.
    • No expansile cough impulse.
    • Usually possible to get above the swelling.
  3. Varicocele
    • “Bag of worms” sensation.
    • More prominent on standing and decreases when supine.
    • No cough impulse.
  4. Epididymo-orchitis
    • Painful, tender scrotal swelling with fever or urinary symptoms.
    • Testis may not be separately palpable.
  5. Testicular tumour
    • Firm, painless intratesticular mass.
    • Testis not separately palpable.
    • No cough impulse or reducibility.
  6. Inguinal lymphadenopathy
    • Multiple discrete nodules.
    • Non-reducible and no cough impulse.
  7. Lipoma of the spermatic cord
    • Soft, non-reducible swelling.
    • No expansile cough impulse.
  8. Saphena varix
    • Compressible swelling at the saphenofemoral junction.
    • May have a cough impulse and disappear on lying down.
    • Associated varicose veins may be present.
  9. Psoas abscess
    • Fluctuant swelling below the inguinal ligament.
    • May be associated with fever, tuberculosis, hip flexion deformity, or spinal disease.

Investigations

Routine preoperative investigations

  • Complete blood count
  • Blood group and cross-match, if indicated
  • Blood glucose
  • Renal function tests and serum electrolytes
  • Liver function tests if clinically indicated
  • Urine routine microscopy and culture, if urinary symptoms are present
  • ECG in older patients or those with cardiac risk factors
  • Chest radiograph when clinically indicated

Hernia-specific investigations

  • Ultrasonography of groin with Valsalva manoeuvre: Useful if the diagnosis is uncertain, for occult hernia, or to differentiate hydrocele, lymph nodes, and other groin masses.
  • CT abdomen/pelvis or MRI: Usually not needed for a clinically obvious inguinal hernia. Consider for recurrent, occult, complex, or diagnostically uncertain groin swelling.

Additional investigations according to risk factors

  • HbA1c in known diabetes
  • Pulmonary function testing if COPD is suspected
  • Prostate assessment in elderly males with lower urinary tract symptoms
  • Stool assessment and treatment for constipation where indicated.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.