Q1 — 20 marks Enlist the latest WHO system of classification for soft tissue tumours; describe the notable changes in lipomatous, fibromatous/myofibroblastic and smooth muscle tumours in it. Q2 — 20 marks Discuss in detail the role of Artificial Intelligence in Pathology. Q3 — 20 marks Discuss in detail the pathogenesis and morphology of Alzheimer’s disease with a note on recent advances. Q4 — Short notes — 4 × 10 marks a) IgG4-related diseases b) Laboratory workup of male infertility with recent updates c) Next Generation Gene Sequencing and its applications d) Updates in molecular biology of gliomas

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

WHO classification soft tissue tumours 2020 2023

Searching PubMed

artificial intelligence pathology deep learning diagnostic

Searching the Web

WHO 2020 5th edition classification soft tissue tumours notable changes lipomatous fibromatous smooth muscle

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading Web Page

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9682218

Reading File
Reading File
Searching PubMed

Alzheimer disease pathogenesis amyloid tau recent advances

Searching PubMed

glioma IDH1 molecular classification WHO 2021

Searching PubMed

next generation sequencing clinical pathology applications

Searching PubMed

male infertility semen analysis laboratory workup

Finding Sources
Reading Web Page

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8167394

Searching PubMed

IgG4 related disease pathogenesis treatment

Searching PubMed

Alzheimer lecanemab donanemab immunotherapy recent advances


COMPREHENSIVE PATHOLOGY EXAMINATION ANSWERS


Q1 — WHO Classification of Soft Tissue Tumours: Notable Changes in the 5th Edition (2020)

Overview

The WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours, 5th Edition (2020) is published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). It is the third volume in the 5th WHO Blue Book series and replaced the 2013 (4th) edition. The most significant conceptual shift in this edition is the integration of molecular/genetic characterization (recurrent gene fusions, specific mutations) alongside histomorphology and immunohistochemistry as defining criteria for tumour entities. Many new entities are named after their driving fusion genes (e.g., EWSR1-SMAD3-positive fibroblastic tumour).

Full WHO 2020 Classification of Soft Tissue Tumours — Category Listing

CategoryBenignIntermediate (locally aggressive)Intermediate (rarely metastasising)Malignant
1. Adipocytic tumoursLipoma, Lipomatosis, Angiolipoma, Myolipoma, Chondroid lipoma, Lipoblastoma, Spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma, HibernomaAtypical lipomatous tumour / WD liposarcomaAtypical spindle cell/pleomorphic lipomatous tumour (NEW)Dedifferentiated liposarcoma, Myxoid liposarcoma, Pleomorphic liposarcoma, Myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma (NEW)
2. Fibroblastic/Myofibroblastic tumoursNodular fasciitis, Proliferative fasciitis/myositis, Elastofibroma, Fibrous hamartoma of infancy, Angiofibroma of soft tissue (NEW), EWSR1-SMAD3-positive fibroblastic tumour (NEW-emerging), Myofibroblastoma (renamed from mammary-type myofibroblastoma), Gardner fibroma, othersPalmar/plantar fibromatosis, Desmoid fibromatosis, Lipofibromatosis, DFSP, Giant cell fibroblastomaSolitary fibrous tumour, IMT, Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma, Superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumour (NEW), Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma, Infantile fibrosarcomaSFT malignant, Myxofibrosarcoma, Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma, Fibrosarcoma NOS
3. So-called fibrohistiocytic tumoursTenosynovial giant cell tumour (localized/diffuse), Plexiform fibrohistiocytic tumour, Giant cell tumour of soft tissue-Atypical fibroxanthoma, Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytomaPleomorphic dermal sarcoma, Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma
4. Vascular tumoursHaemangiomas (various), Lymphangiomas, Epithelioid haemangiomaKaposiform haemangioendotheliomaRetiform/composite haemangioendothelioma, Kaposi sarcomaEpithelioid haemangioendothelioma, Angiosarcoma
5. Pericytic (perivascular) tumoursGlomus tumour, Myopericytoma-Glomangiosarcoma-
6. Smooth muscle tumoursLeiomyomaSM tumour of uncertain malignant potential, EBV-associated smooth muscle tumour (NEW)-Inflammatory leiomyosarcoma (NEW), Leiomyosarcoma
7. Skeletal muscle tumoursRhabdomyoma--RMS (embryonal, alveolar, pleomorphic, spindle cell/sclerosing — with molecular subclassification updated)
8. GISTGIST (benign)GIST (uncertain)-GIST (malignant)
9. Chondro-osseous tumoursSoft tissue chondroma, Extraskeletal osteosarcoma---
10. Peripheral nerve sheath tumoursSchwannoma, Neurofibroma, Perineurioma, Malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumour (renamed)--MPNST, Epithelioid MPNST
11. Tumours of uncertain differentiationVarious benignHaemosiderotic fibrolipomatous tumourOssifying fibromyxoid tumour, Myoepithelioma, AFHSynovial sarcoma, Epithelioid sarcoma, ASPS, Clear cell sarcoma, Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, DSRCT, PEComa malignant, NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm (emerging)
12. Undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas of bone and soft tissue---Ewing sarcoma, CIC-rearranged sarcoma, BCOR-rearranged sarcoma (NEW), sarcoma with BCOR internal tandem duplication

Notable Changes in Specific Categories

A. LIPOMATOUS (ADIPOCYTIC) TUMOURS

Two major new entities:
1. Atypical Spindle Cell/Pleomorphic Lipomatous Tumour (ASPLT)
  • Newly recognized as a distinct entity (previously lumped with spindle cell/pleomorphic lipoma or spindled ALT).
  • Morphology: Variable proportions of atypical spindle cells, adipocytes, uni- or multivacuolated lipoblasts, and pleomorphic/multinucleated giant cells in a myxoid to collagenous stroma.
  • Key distinguishing feature: Lacks MDM2 and CDK4 amplification (thus NOT an ALT/WD liposarcoma); Rb protein expression is generally lost (RB1 deletion/inactivation).
  • Behaviour: Low recurrence rate (10-15%), no known risk of dedifferentiation - hence placed in intermediate (rarely metastasising) category.
  • IHC: CD34 positive in many cases; desmin focal positivity.
  • Clinical note: Typically arises in the subcutis of the extremities and trunk; predominantly in middle-aged adults.
2. Myxoid Pleomorphic Liposarcoma (MPLPS)
  • A rare high-grade liposarcoma added as a distinct malignant entity.
  • Morphology: Admixture of areas resembling conventional myxoid liposarcoma (prominent myxoid stroma, plexiform vasculature) with more cellular regions showing overt nuclear pleomorphism resembling pleomorphic liposarcoma.
  • Key molecular feature: Lacks both MDM2 amplification and DDIT3 (FUS-DDIT3) gene fusion - thus distinct from both myxoid and pleomorphic liposarcoma.
  • Demography: Occurs predominantly in children and young adults; strong predilection for the mediastinum (unusual site for most liposarcomas).
  • Behaviour: Aggressive, akin to pleomorphic liposarcoma.
Other lipomatous nomenclature notes:
  • The terminology "atypical lipomatous tumour" (ALT) vs. "well-differentiated liposarcoma" (WDLS) is retained but clarified: ALT for resectable superficial/extremity tumours with low risk; WDLS for deep/retroperitoneal tumours where complete resection is difficult.
  • Myxoid liposarcoma and round cell liposarcoma from the 4th edition are now unified as myxoid liposarcoma (with or without round cell areas), reflecting the same FUS-DDIT3 or EWSR1-DDIT3 translocation.

B. FIBROBLASTIC/MYOFIBROBLASTIC TUMOURS

Three important new benign entities were added in this large category:
1. Angiofibroma of Soft Tissue
  • Previously classified under miscellaneous or "uncertain differentiation" lesions.
  • Morphology: Bland spindled to stellate cells embedded in a prominent fibromyxoid stroma with a branching, thin-walled vasculature.
  • Molecular: Harbors AHRR-NCOA2 or related gene fusions.
  • Behaviour: Benign but with tendency for local recurrence; hence classified as benign.
  • Demographics: Adults, predominantly distal extremities.
2. EWSR1-SMAD3-Positive Fibroblastic Tumour (listed as "emerging" entity)
  • Defined by the EWSR1::SMAD3 gene fusion - one of the first truly fusion gene-named benign soft tissue entities.
  • Morphology: Intersecting cellular fascicles of bland, monomorphic spindle cells alternating with hypocellular hyalinised areas.
  • IHC: Nuclear expression of ERG (a useful surrogate marker).
  • Site: Small acral (hands and feet) dermal/subcutaneous nodule.
  • Behaviour: Indolent, benign.
3. Superficial CD34-Positive Fibroblastic Tumour
  • Rare, superficial dermal and subcutaneous tumour, placed in the intermediate (rarely metastasising) group.
  • Morphology: Large eosinophilic cells with granular to glassy cytoplasm and marked pleomorphism but strikingly low mitotic count - a diagnostically confusing combination.
  • IHC: Strongly CD34 positive; frequent keratin co-expression.
  • Behaviour: Rarely metastasises despite alarming morphology.
  • Molecular: PRDM10 rearrangements described.
Other key fibromatous changes:
  • Mammary-type myofibroblastoma renamed to Myofibroblastoma (recognising it is not restricted to the breast or mammary-type stroma).
  • Solitary Fibrous Tumour (SFT): Risk stratification now formally incorporated - a multi-parameter scoring system based on age, tumour size, mitotic activity, and necrosis is recommended to replace the old benign/malignant dichotomy.
  • Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumour (IMT): Genetic profile better characterized; ALK rearrangements remain central to diagnosis and are now therapeutically relevant (ALK inhibitors).
  • Desmoid-type fibromatosis: CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) mutations further validated for diagnosis and CTNNB1 codon 41 mutations associated with higher recurrence.

C. SMOOTH MUSCLE TUMOURS

Two distinct new entities introduced:
1. EBV-Associated Smooth Muscle Tumour
  • Added as an intermediate entity (uncertain malignant potential).
  • Pathogenesis: Driven by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, almost exclusively in immunocompromised patients: post-transplant recipients, HIV/AIDS, congenital immunodeficiency.
  • Morphology: Smooth muscle-differentiated spindle cells with variable mild atypia, often arranged in fascicles; notably lacks the high-grade features of conventional leiomyosarcoma. EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) can be demonstrated by in-situ hybridisation.
  • Behaviour: Unpredictable; may be multifocal (polyclonal - different EBV strains in different lesions within the same patient). Not classified as malignant because of its distinct biology from conventional LMS.
  • Sites: Various visceral, soft tissue, and CNS locations.
2. Inflammatory Leiomyosarcoma
  • Newly recognized as a malignant entity but thought to be relatively indolent compared to conventional LMS.
  • Morphology: Variably atypical eosinophilic spindle cells in fascicles with mitotic activity PLUS a prominent, usually diffuse, mixed (predominantly mononuclear) inflammatory infiltrate - the defining histological feature.
  • Molecular hallmark: Near-haploid karyotype - an unusual and distinctive cytogenetic finding.
  • Site: Predominantly deep soft tissues of the extremities.
  • Behaviour: Malignant but with better outcomes than conventional LMS; metastatic potential present.
Retained entities in smooth muscle category:
  • Leiomyoma (benign)
  • Smooth muscle tumour of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) - criteria refined
  • Leiomyosarcoma (conventional) - remains the primary malignant entity

Q2 — Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pathology

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in pathology refers to the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms to pathological data - principally whole slide images (WSI), but also genomic, proteomic, and clinical data - to assist or augment the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive functions of pathologists. The field has grown exponentially with the advent of digital pathology (the scanning of glass slides to high-resolution digital formats) and the availability of large annotated datasets. As Zhang et al. (2026, PMID: 41484927) note, AI in digital pathology is now transitioning from experimental tools to clinical-grade systems.

Technical Foundations

1. Machine Learning (ML)
  • Traditional algorithms (Support Vector Machines, Random Forests) applied to extracted features (texture, shape, colour).
  • Used in quantitative IHC scoring (Ki-67, ER/PR), cell counting.
2. Deep Learning (DL) - Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)
  • Learn hierarchical image features without hand-crafted feature engineering.
  • Architectures: ResNet, VGG, InceptionNet, EfficientNet for patch-level classification.
  • U-Net and variants: For pixel-wise semantic segmentation (tumour region delineation, gland segmentation).
3. Transformer-based Models / Foundation Models
  • Self-attention mechanisms (Vision Transformers - ViTs) capture global context.
  • Large foundational pathology models (e.g., UNI, CONCH, PLIP) trained on millions of WSI patches now serve as versatile feature encoders.
4. Multiple Instance Learning (MIL)
  • Allows whole-slide-level classification without exhaustive pixel annotation.
  • The WSI is a "bag" of patches; the model learns bag-level labels - critical for practical deployment.
5. Multimodal AI
  • Integration of WSI features with genomic data, clinical parameters, and radiology using multi-input networks for integrated diagnosis.

Applications in Pathology

A. Diagnostic Pathology

Cancer Detection and Grading:
  • Prostate cancer: Gleason grading by AI has reached concordance with expert pathologists in multiple studies; FDA-cleared tools (e.g., Paige Prostate) are available.
  • Breast cancer: HER2 scoring, mitosis counting, tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) quantification.
  • Cervical cytology: AI-assisted screening (triage of Pap smears) reduces workload significantly.
  • Colorectal cancer: MSI (microsatellite instability) prediction directly from H&E slides without molecular testing.
  • Lung cancer: Subtype classification (adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell).
Quality Assurance:
  • Detection of biopsy adequacy, artefact identification, focus detection on WSIs.

B. Prognostic and Predictive Pathology

  • AI models trained on H&E WSIs can predict molecular alterations (IDH mutation, EGFR mutation, KRAS status) directly from histomorphology - reducing turnaround time and cost.
  • Prognostic scoring systems: AI-derived tumour microenvironment maps (TIL density, stromal ratio) predict survival independently of stage in multiple cancers.
  • Spatial transcriptomics integration: AI models link morphological features to gene expression patterns, enabling spatial molecular profiling.

C. Immunohistochemistry and Biomarker Quantification

  • Automated scoring of Ki-67 (proliferation index), ER/PR/HER2 in breast cancer (ASCO/CAP guidelines now accept AI-assisted quantification).
  • Automated PD-L1 scoring (CPS, TPS calculations) - a critical predictive biomarker for immunotherapy.
  • CD3/CD8/FOXP3 TIL quantification in immune contexture analysis.

D. Digital and Computational Pathology Workflow

  • Slide sorting and prioritisation: AI triages urgent cases (e.g., cancer positives) to the top of a worklist - reduces reporting turnaround time.
  • Auto-pre-screening: Flags negative slides (e.g., in cervical screening), freeing pathologist time.
  • Co-registration: AI aligns serial sections, multiplex IHC panels, and corresponding radiology images.

E. Cytopathology

  • FNAC (fine needle aspiration) cytology analysis for thyroid nodules, lung lesions, lymph nodes.
  • Liquid biopsy analysis - cell-free DNA mutation calling from sequencing data.
  • Silva & Schmitt (2024, PMID: 39557410) specifically highlight NGS integration with cytology specimens as a major emerging application.

F. Molecular Pathology and Genomics Integration

  • Variant calling and interpretation: AI assists in classifying germline/somatic variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in NGS panels.
  • Tumour mutational burden (TMB) and copy number variation (CNV) analysis from sequencing pipelines.
  • AI-driven integrated reports: Combining morphological diagnosis with molecular profiling into single actionable outputs.

G. Telepathology and Low-Resource Settings

  • AI-powered telepathology platforms enable expert-quality diagnostics in resource-limited environments.
  • Particularly impactful for cancer screening programs (cervical, breast) in LMICs.

Challenges and Limitations

ChallengeDetails
Data quality and quantityAI requires large, well-annotated datasets; annotation is expensive and requires expert pathologist time
Dataset biasModels trained on data from one institution/scanner may not generalise to others (domain shift)
Interpretability (Black Box)Deep learning models lack transparency; Grad-CAM and attention maps partially address this
Regulatory approvalFew AI tools have full regulatory clearance (FDA, CE mark); most still require pathologist oversight
Workflow integrationDICOM compatibility, LIS integration, and infrastructure costs remain barriers
Rare entitiesLimited data for rare tumours; AI performance degrades significantly outside training distribution
Ethics and liabilityAccountability for AI diagnostic errors; medicolegal framework still evolving
As van Diest et al. (Histopathology 2024, PMID: 38433288) emphasise, AI is best viewed as a tool to assist pathologists, not replace them - human oversight remains indispensable for complex diagnostic scenarios.

Current Status and Future Directions

  • FDA/CE-cleared tools: Paige Prostate (prostate cancer detection), Ibex Galen (prostate grading), Stratipath Breast, Aiforia (neuro/renal pathology), FullFocus (automated focusing).
  • Foundation pathology models: Large self-supervised models (UNI trained on 100,000+ WSIs) are enabling few-shot learning for rare entities.
  • AI + Omics (Pathomics): Spatial multiomics integrated with AI to generate pan-cancer molecular maps from histology alone.
  • Federated learning: Training AI models across institutions without sharing patient data - addresses privacy and data governance concerns.
  • Future pathology will likely see AI as a "digital assistant" performing routine quantification and screening while pathologists focus on complex interpretation, correlation, and communication.
(Sources: [Schulz et al., Pathologie 2026, PMID: 41396309]; [Zhang et al., Military Medical Research 2026, PMID: 41484927]; [Jariyapan et al., Malaysian J Pathol 2025, PMID: 40302471]; [van Diest et al., Histopathology 2024, PMID: 38433288])

Q3 — Alzheimer's Disease: Pathogenesis, Morphology, and Recent Advances

Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder and the leading cause of dementia globally, accounting for 60-80% of all dementia cases. It affects approximately 11% of individuals aged 65 years and older, rising to nearly 68% of patients in memory disorder clinics. It is characterised by a progressive, insidious decline in memory and cognition leading to functional impairment. The hallmark neuropathological features are amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), concentrated in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex (Braak and Braak staging). (Bradley and Daroff's Neurology in Clinical Practice)

Classification

TypeGeneticsOnsetNotes
Sporadic (Late-onset)APOE4 strongest risk allele>65 years>99% of cases
Familial (Early-onset autosomal dominant)APP (chr. 21), PSEN1 (chr. 14), PSEN2 (chr. 1) mutations<65 years<1% of cases
Down syndrome-associatedTrisomy 21, extra APP gene~40sNear universal AD by age 60

Pathogenesis

1. The Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis (Central Paradigm)

The central hypothesis, proposed by Hardy and Higgins in 1992, postulates that abnormal processing and accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide is the initiating event:
  • Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) is a transmembrane glycoprotein cleaved by:
    • Non-amyloidogenic pathway: α-secretase cleaves APP within the Aβ domain (no plaque formation)
    • Amyloidogenic pathway: Sequential cleavage by β-secretase (BACE1) then γ-secretase complex (presenilin 1/2, nicastrin, PEN2, APH1) generates Aβ peptides
  • Aβ40 (more common, more soluble) vs. Aβ42 (longer, more prone to oligomerisation and fibrillisation)
  • Aβ42 oligomers → protofibrils → insoluble fibrils → neuritic (senile) plaques
  • Oligomeric Aβ is considered the most neurotoxic species (impairs synaptic function, causes mitochondrial dysfunction, triggers inflammatory cascades)
APOE4 and Aβ clearance:
  • APOE4 (chromosome 19) impairs Aβ clearance via the blood-brain barrier and lymphatic/glymphatic pathways; enhances Aβ aggregation.
  • APOE4 homozygosity increases AD risk ~12-fold; heterozygosity ~3-4 fold.
  • APOE2 is protective.

2. Tau Pathology and Neurofibrillary Tangles

  • Tau is a microtubule-associated protein that stabilises the cytoskeleton in axons.
  • In AD, tau undergoes hyperphosphorylation at serine/threonine residues by kinases (GSK-3β, CDK5) - causing it to detach from microtubules.
  • Detached, hyperphosphorylated tau aggregates first as soluble oligomers then as paired helical filaments (PHFs) - the structural basis of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs).
  • NFTs form first in entorhinal cortex and hippocampus (Braak stages I-II), then spread to association cortices (stages III-IV), and finally to all neocortex (stages V-VI) - correlating with clinical progression.
  • Tau spread is prion-like: Evidence suggests pathological tau seeds spread trans-synaptically through neural networks.
  • Recent work (PMID: 40563464; PMID: 41513640) highlights tau-Aβ interplay: Aβ oligomers promote tau hyperphosphorylation; tau promotes Aβ toxicity - a vicious cycle.

3. Neuroinflammation (Third Pillar of Pathogenesis)

  • Microglia (brain-resident macrophages) are activated by Aβ plaques and NFTs.
  • Initially protective (phagocytosis of Aβ); chronically, sustained microglial activation releases pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) damaging neurons.
  • TREM2 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2) mutations (e.g., R47H variant) - a significant AD genetic risk factor - impair microglial Aβ clearance and phagocytic function.
  • Complement activation (C1q tags synapses for elimination) contributes to synaptic pruning.
  • Recent evidence (PMID: 40849188) confirms microglial activation by both Aβ and tau through distinct mechanisms (inflammasome activation, NLRP3 pathway).

4. Glutamatergic Excitotoxicity and Synaptic Failure

  • Aβ oligomers dysregulate NMDA receptor activity, causing calcium influx and excitotoxicity.
  • Synaptic loss correlates most strongly with cognitive impairment (stronger than plaque burden alone).
  • Loss of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (nucleus basalis of Meynert) → cholinergic deficiency → basis of current symptomatic therapy (cholinesterase inhibitors).

5. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress

  • Aβ and tau both impair mitochondrial electron transport chain.
  • Increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) → lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, DNA damage.
  • The mitochondrial cascade hypothesis (Swerdlow et al.) proposes mitochondrial dysfunction, partly inherited maternally, initiates the cascade.

6. Glymphatic System Dysfunction

  • The glymphatic system (perivascular CSF-interstitial fluid exchange, mediated by aquaporin-4 on astrocytic end-feet) is the main brain waste-clearance pathway.
  • Sleep is essential for glymphatic clearance of Aβ - sleep disruption accelerates Aβ accumulation.
  • Dysfunction of the glymphatic system is now considered a key upstream mechanism in late-onset AD.

Morphology

Gross Pathology

  • Brain weight reduced (may be 900-1000 g vs. normal ~1400 g in severe cases)
  • Cortical atrophy: Gyri narrowed, sulci widened - most pronounced in:
    • Hippocampus and entorhinal cortex (invariably affected first)
    • Temporal, parietal, and frontal association cortices
    • Occipital and primary motor cortices are relatively spared
  • Ventricular enlargement (hydrocephalus ex vacuo): Especially temporal horns
  • The basal ganglia, cerebellum, and brainstem are largely spared grossly (though affected at the cellular level)

Microscopic Pathology

1. Neuritic (Senile) Plaques
  • Core: Insoluble Aβ42 fibrils
  • Surrounding: Dystrophic neurites (swollen axons and dendrites), reactive astrocytes, activated microglia
  • Two types:
    • Diffuse plaques: Amorphous Aβ deposits without neuritic reaction - pre-amyloid stage, asymptomatic
    • Neuritic plaques: Dense amyloid core with dystrophic neurites - correlate with active disease
  • Stains: Congo red (apple-green birefringence under polarised light), Thioflavin-S (fluorescent), Bielschowsky silver stain, and newer amyloid-specific antibodies (Aβ IHC)
2. Neurofibrillary Tangles (NFTs)
  • Intraneuronal (in living neurons) or extracellular "ghost tangles" (after neuron death)
  • Composed of paired helical filaments (PHFs) of hyperphosphorylated tau
  • Morphology: Flame-shaped or globose; fill the neuronal cytoplasm
  • Stains: Bielschowsky silver stain, Gallyas silver stain, and phospho-tau IHC (AT8, AT100 antibodies)
  • Distribution follows Braak staging (see above)
3. Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA - Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy)
  • Aβ deposition in walls of cerebral blood vessels (leptomeningeal and cortical arterioles)
  • Present in >80% of AD cases
  • Weakens vessel walls → predisposes to lobar haemorrhage - a complication relevant in anti-amyloid therapy (ARIA - see below)
4. Neuronal and Synaptic Loss
  • Most severe in CA1 of hippocampus, subiculum, entorhinal cortex
  • Synaptophysin IHC shows reduced pre-synaptic density in affected regions
5. Hirano Bodies and Granulovacuolar Degeneration
  • Hirano bodies: Eosinophilic rod-like actin inclusions in proximal dendrites of CA1 hippocampal neurons
  • Granulovacuolar degeneration (GVD): Cytoplasmic vacuoles with argyrophilic granules in pyramidal neurons of hippocampus - represents late-stage lysosomal dysfunction
6. Gliosis
  • Reactive astrocytosis (GFAP positive)
  • Microglial activation around plaques (Iba-1, HLA-DR positive)

Neuropathological Diagnostic Criteria (ABC Score - NIA-AA 2012)

  • A: Aβ/amyloid plaque score (Thal phases 0-5)
  • B: NFT stage (Braak and Braak stages 0-VI)
  • C: Neuritic plaque score (CERAD score: absent, sparse, moderate, frequent)
  • High ABC score = high level of AD neuropathological change

Recent Advances

1. Biomarkers and the Diagnostic Revolution (A/T/N Framework)

The NIA-AA Research Framework (2018) introduced a biological definition of AD based on three biomarker categories:
  • A (Amyloid): Elevated CSF Aβ42 (↓), amyloid PET positive
  • T (Tau): Elevated CSF phospho-tau-181/217, tau PET positive
  • N (Neurodegeneration): FDG-PET hypometabolism, atrophy on MRI, elevated CSF total tau
Plasma biomarkers (major recent breakthrough):
  • Plasma p-tau217 (phosphorylated tau at threonine 217): Now recognised as the most accurate single blood biomarker for AD, with accuracy approaching CSF and PET. Validated in large cohorts (2024-2026 data).
  • Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio: Correlates with amyloid burden.
  • GFAP (Glial fibrillary acidic protein): Plasma levels reflect astrocytic activation and correlate with AD severity.
  • NfL (Neurofilament light chain): Non-specific marker of neurodegeneration; useful for monitoring disease progression.
  • These plasma biomarkers enable blood-based screening for AD - a transformative development for primary care settings.

2. Anti-Amyloid Immunotherapy (FDA-Approved Drugs)

DrugMechanismKey TrialStatus
Lecanemab (Leqembi)Anti-Aβ protofibrils IgG1 mAbCLARITY-AD (2023) - 27% slower decline at 18 monthsFDA full approval July 2023
DonanemabAnti-Aβ N-terminal pyroglutamate IgG1 mAbTRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 (2023) - 35% slower declineFDA approved July 2024
Aducanumab (Aduhelm)Anti-Aβ aggregate mAbControversial (FDA accelerated approval 2021)Withdrawn from market 2024
  • ARIA (Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities): A critical safety concern with anti-amyloid antibodies - ARIA-E (oedema/effusions) and ARIA-H (microhaemorrhages) on MRI. More common and severe in APOE4 carriers.
  • These drugs represent proof-of-concept that the amyloid hypothesis is valid as a therapeutic target, though debate about clinical meaningfulness of effect sizes continues (PMID: 38830549).

3. Anti-Tau Therapies

  • ABBV-CLS-7262 / other tau aggregation inhibitors in clinical trials.
  • Anti-tau monoclonal antibodies (gosuranemab, semorinemab, zagotenemab) - Phase 2/3 trials ongoing with mixed results.
  • Tau PET (18F-flortaucipir, 18F-MK-6240) now enables in-vivo staging of tau propagation.

4. TREM2, Neuroinflammation, and New Targets

  • TREM2 agonist antibodies (AL002c) - Phase 2 trials.
  • RIPK1 inhibitors targeting neuroinflammatory cell death.
  • Complement inhibitors and anti-CSF1R agents modulating microglial activity.

5. Genetics and Precision Medicine

  • APOE-targeted therapies: APOE4 reduction strategies (antisense oligonucleotides, APOE4 → APOE3 gene editing) in early-phase trials.
  • GWAS discoveries (2022-2024): New loci identified in BIN1, CLU, PICALM, CR1, ABCA7, ZCWPW1, and dozens more - implicating endosomal trafficking, lipid metabolism, complement, and microglial pathways.
  • Polygenic risk scores (PRS): Enabling precision risk stratification before symptoms appear.

6. Early Detection and Prevention Trials

  • A4 Study, AHEAD 3-45 trial: Anti-amyloid treatment in cognitively normal amyloid-positive individuals - testing the earliest possible treatment window.
  • PREVENT-AD, DIAN-TU: Testing interventions in familial (autosomal dominant) AD carriers decades before symptom onset.
(Sources: [Abdulkhaliq et al., Cell Death Dis 2026, PMID: 41513640]; [Hong et al., Biomolecules 2025, PMID: 40563464]; [Gyimesi et al., Open Biology 2024, PMID: 38862019]; [Smith et al., J Prev AD 2025, PMID: 39893139]; [Jin & Noble, eNeuro 2024, PMID: 39332901]; Bradley and Daroff's Neurology in Clinical Practice; Robbins & Kumar Basic Pathology, p. 224)

Q4 — Short Notes (4 × 10 marks)


Q4a — IgG4-Related Disease

Definition and Concept

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a systemic fibroinflammatory condition characterised by:
  1. Tissue infiltrates dominated by IgG4-secreting plasma cells and lymphocytes (predominantly T cells)
  2. Storiform (cart-wheel) fibrosis
  3. Obliterative phlebitis
  4. Usually elevated serum IgG4 levels (>135 mg/dL)
  5. Mass-forming lesions in one or multiple organs
It affects virtually every organ system. The disease most often presents in middle-aged to older males. (Robbins, Cotran & Kumar Pathologic Basis of Disease, 2023 [p. 224])

Organs Involved

Organ/SystemClinical Manifestation
PancreasType 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP-1) - "sausage pancreas" on imaging
Biliary treeSclerosing cholangitis (mimics PSC or cholangiocarcinoma)
Salivary glandsMikulicz syndrome (bilateral parotid/submandibular enlargement)
Lacrimal glands / OrbitDacryoadenitis, orbital pseudotumour
KidneysTubulointerstitial nephritis, membranous nephropathy
LungsPulmonary inflammatory pseudotumours, interstitial fibrosis
Lymph nodesLymphadenopathy (may mimic lymphoma)
MeningesHypertrophic pachymeningitis
AortaInflammatory aortitis, periaortitis
RetroperitoneumIdiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (Ormond disease)
ThyroidRiedel thyroiditis
BreastInflammatory pseudotumour

Pathogenesis

The precise pathogenesis is incompletely understood. Key points:
  • IgG4 antibody itself does not activate complement efficiently and does not bind Fc receptors - thus its direct role in tissue injury is uncertain.
  • Central mechanism likely involves aberrant T cell activation, particularly Th2 and T regulatory (Treg) cells with secretion of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, and TGF-β.
  • Plasmablasts (circulating IgG4-positive plasmablasts) are elevated in active disease and serve as diagnostic markers.
  • CD4+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells have recently been implicated as key drivers (2023 data).
  • TGF-β from Tregs drives storiform fibrosis via fibroblast activation.
  • B cells likely play an antigen-presentation role - evidenced by clinical response to anti-CD20 (rituximab).
  • No causative autoantigen firmly identified, though galectin-3 and laminin-511 have been proposed candidates (2025 reviews, PMID: 40528331).

Histopathological Diagnosis (Boston Consensus Criteria)

Three histological hallmarks (all three = definitive; two = probable):
  1. Dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with >40% IgG4+ plasma cells and IgG4+/IgG+ ratio >40%
  2. Storiform fibrosis (swirling, whorled fibrous tissue)
  3. Obliterative phlebitis (inflammatory destruction of venous walls)
Supportive features: tissue eosinophilia, IgG4+/IgG+ plasma cell ratio.
IHC: Anti-IgG4 staining - >10 IgG4+ plasma cells per HPF (varies by organ; pancreas requires >20/HPF).

Serology

  • Serum IgG4 > 135 mg/dL (elevated in ~70% of active disease; not specific)
  • Serum IgG4 > 280 mg/dL (more specific)
  • ANA, ANCA, anti-SSA/SSB - usually negative (helps differentiate from Sjögren's, ANCA vasculitis)
  • Elevated IgE and eosinophilia common (reflecting Th2 bias)

Treatment

  • Glucocorticoids: First-line; dramatic response in most patients (diagnostic and therapeutic).
    • Prednisolone 30-40 mg/day tapered over 3-6 months.
  • Rituximab (anti-CD20): For relapsing/refractory disease or glucocorticoid-dependent cases; highly effective (PMID: 40398200 - "can IgG4 disease be cured?")
  • Inebilizumab (anti-CD19): Phase 2/3 trial data shows benefit over placebo in relapse reduction.
  • Elsubrutinib (BTK inhibitor): Emerging therapeutic option targeting B-cell receptor signalling.
  • Fibrotic damage (e.g., retroperitoneal fibrosis, Riedel thyroiditis) may not fully reverse with treatment.
(Sources: Robbins, Cotran & Kumar Pathologic Basis of Disease, p. 224; Rheumatology 2-Volume Set (2022, Elsevier); [Parums, Med Sci Monitor 2025, PMID: 40528331]; [González-García et al., J Clin Med 2025, PMID: 41095851]; [Peyronel et al., Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2023, PMID: 36960748])

Q4b — Laboratory Workup of Male Infertility with Recent Updates

Definition

Male factor infertility is identified in 40-50% of infertile couples and is the sole cause in ~20-30%. Investigation must be systematic and based on the WHO 6th edition semen analysis reference values (2021).

Step-by-Step Laboratory Workup

Step 1: Semen Analysis (FIRST and MOST IMPORTANT test)

Conditions: 2-5 days of sexual abstinence; produce by masturbation; process within 60 minutes.
WHO 2021 (6th edition) Reference Values (Lower reference limits, 5th percentile):
ParameterWHO 2021 Reference
Volume≥ 1.4 mL (revised down from 1.5 mL)
Sperm concentration≥ 16 × 10⁶/mL (revised down from 15 × 10⁶/mL)
Total sperm count≥ 39 × 10⁶
Total motility (PR + NP)≥ 42% (revised)
Progressive motility (PR)≥ 30%
Vitality≥ 54% live
Normal morphology (Kruger strict)≥ 4%
pH≥ 7.2
Leukocytes< 1 × 10⁶/mL
MAR test (antisperm antibodies)< 50% sperm with bound particles
Terminology:
  • Azoospermia: No sperm in ejaculate
  • Oligozoospermia: < 16 million/mL (severe: < 5 million/mL)
  • Asthenozoospermia: Reduced motility
  • Teratozoospermia: < 4% normal forms
  • OAT syndrome: Combined oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia (most common pattern)
  • Necrozoospermia: > 54% dead sperm
  • Cryptozoospermia: Rare sperm seen only after centrifugation

Step 2: Repeat Semen Analysis

If abnormal, repeat after 3 months (time for a full spermatogenic cycle = 74 days + transit = ~90 days) to confirm abnormality before further workup.

Step 3: Hormonal Profile

Indicates testicular function vs. hypothalamic-pituitary failure:
HormoneInterpretation
FSHElevated = primary testicular failure (Sertoli cell dysfunction); Normal/low = secondary (hypogonadotropic)
LHElevated in primary failure
Testosterone (total and free)Low = hypogonadism; check if primary or secondary
ProlactinIf elevated → pituitary adenoma workup
EstradiolElevated in obesity/feminising conditions
Inhibin BMarker of Sertoli cell number; inversely correlates with FSH
Pattern: NOA vs. OA differentiation:
  • Elevated FSH + small testes + azoospermia = likely non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA)
  • Normal FSH + normal testis volume + azoospermia = likely obstructive azoospermia (OA)

Step 4: Genetic Testing

TestIndication
Karyotype (G-banding)Azoospermia or severe oligospermia (<5 million/mL); detects Klinefelter (47,XXY), translocations
Y-chromosome microdeletion (AZF regions)NOA or severe oligospermia; detects AZFa/b/c deletions; AZFa/b = no sperm retrieval possible; AZFc = ~50% sperm retrieval by mTESE
CFTR gene mutationAzoospermia with absent vas deferens (CBAVD - congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens)
DNAI1, DNAI2, DNAAF1Primary ciliary dyskinesia with immotile cilia
Recent update: Whole exome sequencing (WES) and targeted gene panels (e.g., ADGRG2, SPEM1, PICK1, QRICH2, CFAP69) are increasingly used for unexplained NOA and severe teratozoospermia (specific morphological defects like MMAF - multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella, SCOS - Sertoli cell only syndrome). PMID: 41027459

Step 5: Sperm DNA Fragmentation (SDF) Testing

  • Indication: Recurrent miscarriage, failed ART (IVF/ICSI), unexplained infertility, high oxidative stress exposure (smoking, varicocele, fever).
  • Methods:
    • TUNEL assay (gold standard, flow cytometry-based)
    • Comet assay
    • SCSA (Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay)
    • SCD test (Sperm Chromatin Dispersion)
  • Thresholds: DFI > 15% (ICSI), > 25% (IUI/IVF) considered elevated.
  • Recent update (2024-2025): WHO 6th edition and major guidelines now recommend SDF testing in the routine workup of male infertility, particularly before ART; anti-oxidant therapy (CoQ10, vitamin E, C) and varicocele repair can reduce SDF.

Step 6: Testicular/Scrotal Ultrasound (Clinical Correlation)

  • Assess testicular volume (normal >15 mL each), echotexture, varicocele (subclinical detection), hydrocele, epididymal cysts, absent vas deferens.
  • Colour Doppler: Varicocele detection (grade I-III).

Step 7: Post-Ejaculate Urinalysis

  • Rule out retrograde ejaculation (sperm in urine after ejaculation) in patients with low volume anejaculate or diabetic/post-surgery neuropathy.

Step 8: Testicular Biopsy (Azoospermia)

For differentiation of NOA vs. OA (when hormones are equivocal) and for surgical sperm retrieval:
Histological patterns in NOA:
PatternDescription
Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome (SCOS)No germ cells; Sertoli cells only (20-30% chance of focal spermatogenesis on mTESE)
Maturation ArrestSpermatogenesis stops at spermatocyte or spermatid stage
HypospermatogenesisReduced spermatogenesis; best prognosis
Tubular hyalinisationFibrosis of tubules (worst prognosis for sperm retrieval)
Sperm Retrieval Techniques (linked to pathology):
  • PESA/TESA: For OA
  • micro-TESE: For NOA - microsurgical exploration to identify focal active tubules

Recent Updates (2024-2026)

  1. Sperm microbiome: Emerging evidence (PMID: 40003912) links dysbiosis of the semen microbiome (Lactobacillus depletion, pathogenic species) to sperm DNA damage and poor ART outcomes.
  2. Metabolomics and proteomics: Seminal plasma proteomics panels can identify tubular vs. epididymal obstruction without biopsy.
  3. CRISPR-Cas9 and gene therapy: Targeted correction of monogenic causes (e.g., CFTR mutations) explored in preclinical models.
  4. Artificial intelligence in semen analysis: Computer-Assisted Semen Analysis (CASA) systems with AI now approach expert-level accuracy for motility and morphology assessment (PMID: 38759095).
  5. WHO 6th Edition (2021) key change: Reference values are based on fertile men who achieved pregnancy within 12 months, providing more clinically relevant thresholds.
(Sources: [Fraga et al., Arch Med Res 2024, PMID: 39642787]; [Japari et al., Asian J Androl 2025, PMID: 38759095]; [Dhikhirullahi & Zhang, Syst Biol Reprod Med 2025, PMID: 41027459]; [Pozzi et al., Eur Urol Focus 2023, PMID: 36210297])

Q4c — Next Generation Gene Sequencing (NGS) and Its Applications

Definition and Overview

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), also called massively parallel sequencing or high-throughput sequencing (HTS), is a group of technologies that enable rapid, simultaneous sequencing of millions to billions of DNA/RNA fragments in parallel. It overcomes the throughput limitation of traditional Sanger sequencing (which sequences one fragment at a time). NGS can sequence entire genomes, exomes, transcriptomes, or targeted gene panels in a single run.

Platforms and Chemistries

PlatformTechnologyKey Feature
Illumina (SBS)Sequencing by synthesis; reversible dye terminatorsMost widely used; short reads (150-300 bp); high accuracy (>99.9%); best for SNVs, small indels
Ion Torrent (ThermoFisher)pH-based ion detectionSemiconductor sequencing; fast; good for amplicons
Pacific Biosciences (PacBio SMRT)Single molecule real-time sequencingLong reads (10-20+ kb); ideal for structural variants, repeat regions; higher error rate correctable by high coverage
Oxford Nanopore (ONT)Nanopore sequencingLongest reads (>100 kb possible); portable (MinION); real-time; ideal for rapid identification
10x GenomicsChromium linked-readSingle-cell and spatial sequencing

Workflow

  1. DNA/RNA extraction from tissue (FFPE, fresh, blood, cytology)
  2. Library preparation: Fragmentation, end-repair, adapter ligation, barcode/index addition
  3. Enrichment (for targeted panels/exome): Hybridisation capture or amplicon-based
  4. Sequencing: Cluster generation (Illumina) → bridge amplification → sequencing by synthesis
  5. Bioinformatics pipeline:
    • Quality control (FastQC)
    • Alignment to reference genome (BWA, STAR)
    • Variant calling (GATK, FreeBayes, VarScan)
    • Annotation (ANNOVAR, Ensembl VEP)
    • Interpretation (clinical significance - ClinVar, OncoKB, ACMG criteria)

Types of NGS Panels

TypeScopeUse
Targeted gene panel50-500 genesCancer hotspot mutations, hereditary cancer syndromes
Whole Exome Sequencing (WES)~20,000 protein-coding genes (~2% of genome)Rare genetic diseases, cancer somatic/germline
Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)3 billion base pairsStructural variants, non-coding mutations, repeat expansions
RNA-seq (Transcriptome)All expressed genesGene expression, fusion transcript detection
Liquid biopsy NGSctDNA from plasmaCancer monitoring, minimal residual disease, early detection
16S/metagenomic sequencingMicrobial genomesMicrobiome analysis, infectious agents

Clinical Applications

1. Oncology (Largest Application)
  • Somatic mutation profiling: Detection of actionable driver mutations (EGFR, ALK, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ERBB2) for targeted therapy selection.
  • Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP): Foundation Medicine, Guardant360 - analyse hundreds of cancer-relevant genes simultaneously.
  • Tumour Mutational Burden (TMB): High TMB predicts immunotherapy response (pembrolizumab is approved for TMB-high solid tumours regardless of histology).
  • Microsatellite Instability (MSI): Detected by NGS (>15% of sites unstable = MSI-high); predicts response to checkpoint inhibitors.
  • Copy Number Variation (CNV) / Structural Variants: Gene amplifications (HER2, MDM2, CDK4), fusions (EML4-ALK, BCR-ABL, SS18-SSX in synovial sarcoma).
  • Liquid biopsy (ctDNA): Serial monitoring of treatment response and resistance mutations in real time (e.g., EGFR T790M resistance in NSCLC).
2. Haematopathology
  • Myeloid NGS panels: FLT3, NPM1, IDH1/2, DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, TP53 in AML.
  • Lymphoid panels: MYD88, CD79B, NOTCH1, TP53 in B-cell lymphomas.
  • MRD (Minimal Residual Disease) testing by ultra-deep NGS - prognostic for ALL, AML, myeloma.
3. Hereditary Cancer Syndromes
  • Germline testing: BRCA1/2 (breast/ovarian cancer), Lynch syndrome genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2), APC (FAP), PTEN (Cowden), RET (MEN2), VHL, TP53 (Li-Fraumeni).
  • Panel testing replaces sequential single-gene testing.
4. Infectious Diseases
  • Metagenomic NGS (mNGS): Direct sequencing of clinical specimens (CSF, BAL, blood) for pathogen identification without culture.
  • Rapid identification of novel pathogens, AMR gene profiling.
  • SARS-CoV-2 variant surveillance (PMID: 39357183).
5. Rare Genetic and Metabolic Diseases
  • WES/WGS for undiagnosed rare disease - diagnostic yield ~25-40% in paediatric cases.
  • Neonatal screening panels.
  • Pharmacogenomics: CYP2D6, CYP2C19 variants predicting drug metabolism.
6. Prenatal and Reproductive Medicine
  • Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): Cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma; detects trisomies 21, 18, 13.
  • Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-A/M) of embryos by NGS.
7. Neuropathology and CNS Tumours
  • Methylation profiling (850K EPIC array) combined with targeted NGS for brain tumour classification.
  • IDH1/2 sequencing, TERT promoter, CDKN2A/B deletion, EGFR amplification - all now part of integrated WHO 2021 CNS tumour diagnosis (see Q4d).
8. Cytopathology Integration
  • NGS from FNAC specimens, liquid-based cytology samples, effusion fluids.
  • Single-cell NGS on cytological preparations (PMID: 39557410).

Recent Advances

  • Long-read sequencing (PacBio/Nanopore): Resolves complex structural variants, phasing of alleles, repeat expansions (e.g., Huntington disease, C9orf72 ALS) that are invisible to short-read NGS.
  • Spatial transcriptomics (10x Visium, Slide-seq): Spatial mapping of gene expression on tissue sections - revolutionising understanding of tumour microenvironment.
  • Single-cell NGS (scRNA-seq, scATAC-seq): Individual cell resolution of transcriptomes and chromatin accessibility.
  • Epigenome sequencing (RRBS, EPIC methylation array + NGS): DNA methylation as a molecular "clock" and for tumour classification.
  • AI-assisted bioinformatics: Automated variant interpretation, deep learning-based structural variant calling.
(Sources: [Ghoreyshi et al., Discover Oncol 2025, PMID: 40253661]; [Beura et al., Pathol Res Pract 2025, PMID: 41177096]; [Silva & Schmitt, J Pathol Transl Med 2024, PMID: 39557410]; [Thapliyal et al., Pathol Res Pract 2024, PMID: 39357183]; [Yadav et al., Clinica Chimica Acta 2023, PMID: 37839516])

Q4d — Updates in Molecular Biology of Gliomas

Background

Gliomas are diffusely infiltrating glial tumours arising from astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and their precursors. The WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, 5th Edition (2021) fundamentally reorganised glioma classification based on molecular markers rather than histomorphology alone. This was the most significant change in CNS tumour nosology in decades.

Key Molecular Markers and Their Significance

1. IDH Mutation (Isocitrate Dehydrogenase)
  • The central molecular classifier in adult diffuse gliomas.
  • IDH1 codon 132 (most common: R132H) and IDH2 codon 172 mutations.
  • IDH-mutant enzymes convert alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) - an oncometabolite that inhibits alpha-KG dependent dioxygenases (TET enzymes, histone demethylases) → epigenetic dysregulation.
  • IDH mutation → CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP) - global DNA hypermethylation.
  • IDH-mutant gliomas: Better prognosis, longer survival, younger patients.
  • IDH-wildtype gliomas: Worse prognosis; require additional markers to distinguish GBM from other entities.
2. 1p/19q Co-deletion
  • Hallmark of oligodendroglioma (both 1p and 19q must be co-deleted via unbalanced translocation of chromosomes 1 and 19).
  • Arises from IDH-mutant gliomas.
  • Associated with TERT promoter mutation and CIC/FUBP1 mutations.
  • Predicts better chemosensitivity (PCV and temozolomide regimens).
  • Detection: FISH for 1p/19q, SNP array, or NGS.
3. TERT Promoter Mutations (C228T and C250T)
  • Present in IDH-wildtype GBM (~70-80%) and IDH-mutant oligodendroglioma (~80%).
  • Activate telomerase, maintaining telomere length and enabling cellular immortality.
  • Combined IDH-wt + TERT promoter mutation + EGFR amplification/gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of chromosome 10 = diagnostic of IDH-wildtype GBM even without high-grade histology (microvascular proliferation/necrosis).
4. EGFR Amplification and EGFRvIII
  • Present in ~40-50% of IDH-wildtype GBM.
  • EGFRvIII (deletion of exons 2-7): Constitutively active truncated receptor; detected by FISH or ddPCR.
  • Emerging therapeutic target (anti-EGFRvIII CAR-T cells in trials).
5. CDKN2A/B Homozygous Deletion
  • In IDH-mutant astrocytoma: CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion upgrades tumour to Grade 4 (WHO 2021) - regardless of histological appearance.
  • Critical for grading; FISH or array CGH/NGS-based detection.
6. ATRX Mutation
  • Found in IDH-mutant astrocytomas (but not oligodendrogliomas).
  • Associated with Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) pathway.
  • IHC: Loss of ATRX nuclear expression (surrogate for mutation).
  • Used to distinguish astrocytoma (ATRX loss, 1p/19q intact) from oligodendroglioma (ATRX retained, 1p/19q co-deleted).
7. MGMT Promoter Methylation
  • O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair enzyme.
  • Promoter methylation silences MGMT → reduced DNA repair → increased tumour cell death from alkylating agents (temozolomide).
  • Predictive biomarker: MGMT-methylated GBM patients have significantly better response to temozolomide (Stupp protocol) - median OS ~21 months vs. ~12 months unmethylated.
  • Also important in elderly/poor-performance GBM patients to guide temozolomide vs. RT decisions.
  • Detection: Pyrosequencing, MS-PCR, NGS methylation panels.

WHO 2021 CNS Tumour Classification - Glioma Framework

Adult-type diffuse gliomas (3 main entities):
EntityKey Molecular FeaturesGradePrognosis
Astrocytoma, IDH-mutantIDH-mut, ATRX loss, no 1p/19q co-del2, 3, 4Intermediate
Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeletedIDH-mut, 1p/19q co-del, TERT mut, CIC/FUBP1 mut2, 3Best
Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtypeIDH-wt, TERT mut, EGFR amp, +7/-104 (only grade)Worst (median OS ~15 months)
Paediatric-type diffuse gliomas (major NEW additions in 2021):
  • Diffuse astrocytoma, MYB- or MYBL1-altered (low-grade, children)
  • Diffuse low-grade glioma, MAPK pathway-altered (includes BRAF fusions/tandem duplications)
  • Diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered (H3F3A/HIST1H3B K27M mutation; includes DIPG - Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma)
  • Diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant (H3 G34R/V mutations)
  • Infant-type hemispheric glioma (NTRK, ROS1, ALK, MET fusions)
  • Diffuse paediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype and IDH-wildtype (complex; often PDGFRA amplified, MYCN amplified)

Other Key Molecular Updates

BRAF V600E Mutation:
  • Present in ~10% of adult IDH-wildtype GBM; also in paediatric low-grade gliomas, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, epithelioid GBM.
  • Therapeutically targetable (BRAF V600E inhibitors: vemurafenib, dabrafenib + trametinib - FDA-approved for other BRAF V600E cancers; trials ongoing in glioma).
H3 K27M Mutation (Histone 3 mutation):
  • H3F3A or HIST1H3B: K27M substitution.
  • Inhibits EZH2 of the PRC2 complex → global H3K27me3 reduction → epigenetic dysregulation.
  • Defines diffuse midline glioma (thalamus, brainstem, spinal cord) - universally Grade 4.
  • Poor prognosis; no effective systemic therapy; ONC201 (DRD2 antagonist) shows early promise in trials.
FGFR-TACC Fusions (FGFR1-TACC1, FGFR3-TACC3):
  • Present in ~3-4% of GBMs.
  • Potential therapeutic target (FGFR inhibitors).
NF1 and RAS/MAPK pathway:
  • NF1 mutations in ~10% of GBMs.
  • KIAA1549::BRAF fusion = the molecular hallmark of pilocytic astrocytoma (most common childhood brain tumour) - not a diffuse glioma; included in the circumscribed astrocytic glioma group.
CDKN2A Homozygous Deletion in IDH-Mutant Gliomas:
  • As above, upgrades IDH-mutant astrocytoma to Grade 4 - a critical 2021 change.
  • Similarly, CDKN2A/B deletion in IDH-mutant gliomas without high-grade histology is now Grade 4.

Integrated Diagnosis Concept

The WHO 2021 CNS 5th edition introduced the concept of "integrated diagnosis":
  • Final diagnosis = histological classification + WHO grade + molecular alterations
  • Example: "Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO Grade 4, MGMT promoter methylated, TERT promoter mutated, EGFR amplified"
  • This reflects the layered reporting approach: Tissue diagnosis → IHC → molecular testing → integrated report.

Methylation Profiling

  • DNA methylation array (Heidelberg classifier, 850K EPIC array) - a machine-learning classifier trained on thousands of CNS tumours that assigns tumours to one of 100+ molecular classes.
  • Increasingly used as a tie-breaker when histology and conventional molecular markers are discordant (e.g., morphologically GBM but IDH-mutant).
  • Clinically validated; now part of diagnostic workup in major centres.

Therapeutic Implications

BiomarkerTherapeutic Implication
MGMT promoter methylationTemozolomide benefit prediction
IDH mutationVorasidenib (IDH1/2 inhibitor) - Phase 3 INDIGO trial (2023) showed significant PFS benefit in IDH-mutant Grade 2 glioma; FDA approved 2024
BRAF V600ETargeted BRAF/MEK inhibition
NTRK fusionLarotrectinib, entrectinib (tumour-agnostic TRK inhibitor approval)
EGFRvIIICAR-T cell therapy (clinical trials)
H3 K27MONC201 (DRD2 antagonist) trials
The approval of vorasidenib (IDH1/2 inhibitor) in 2024 for IDH-mutant Grade 2 gliomas - based on the INDIGO trial showing a >17-month PFS improvement over placebo - represents the first successful molecularly targeted therapy for low-grade gliomas and validates IDH as a therapeutic target, not just a diagnostic one.
(Sources: [Kalluri et al., J Neurooncol 2025, PMID: 39532825]; [Park et al., JMRI 2023, PMID: 37069792]; [Park et al., JMRI 2026, PMID: 41108953]; WHO Classification of Tumours of the CNS, 5th Edition 2021)

All answers synthesised from: Robbins, Cotran & Kumar Pathologic Basis of Disease (2023); Bradley and Daroff's Neurology in Clinical Practice; Rheumatology 2-Volume Set (Elsevier 2022); WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours 5th Edition (2020); WHO Classification of CNS Tumours 5th Edition (2021); and current PubMed literature (2023-2026).
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.