1000120302.jpg
Analyse this report
analyse_media
Reading File
Here is a thorough analysis of this ECG report:
ECG Report Analysis
Patient & Technical Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Hospital | ESIC Hospital, Tiruppur |
| Date/Time | 26 July 2026, 11:29:55 |
| Patient Name | Jayarani |
| Sex | Female |
| Age | 43 years |
| Auto Report Rate | 99 bpm |
| Paper Speed | 25 mm/sec |
| Gain | 10 mm/mV |
| Filters | 0.50 Hz - 45 Hz, AC 50 Hz |
| Auto Print | 6x2 + 1R rhythm strip |
ECG Interpretation
Rhythm & Rate
- Heart Rate: ~99 bpm (as auto-reported) - borderline tachycardia (upper normal is 100 bpm)
- Rhythm: Regular sinus rhythm (labeled "Rhy II" on the rhythm strip, meaning Lead II rhythm strip)
Axis
- Leads I and aVF morphology suggests a normal cardiac axis (roughly 0° to +90°)
Waveform Analysis
P Waves:
- Appear present and upright in leads I, II, aVF - consistent with normal sinus origin
- No obvious P wave abnormalities (no P mitrale or P pulmonale pattern clearly identifiable at this resolution)
PR Interval:
- Appears within normal limits (~120-200 ms range) - no evidence of heart block
QRS Complex:
- Duration appears normal (< 120 ms) - no bundle branch block pattern
- No obvious pathological Q waves noted in the inferior or lateral leads
- Transition zone in precordial leads (V1-V6) appears normal
ST Segments:
- No clear ST elevation or depression identified
- No obvious STEMI pattern
T Waves:
- T waves appear generally upright in lateral leads
- No definitive T wave inversion visible
Automated Machine Diagnosis
The report states: "Diagnosis for reference - ask your doctor to confirm"
- Auto-analysis: No specific named arrhythmia or conduction abnormality flagged
Summary
This ECG from a 43-year-old female appears to show sinus tachycardia at approximately 99 bpm with no acute ST-elevation or other immediately alarming findings at this level of image resolution. The tracing is technically adequate across all 12 leads plus a rhythm strip.
Important Caveats
This analysis is for educational/reference purposes only. The ECG machine itself notes "ask your doctor to confirm." Subtle findings such as mild ST changes, T-wave flattening, or borderline interval prolongation can be missed on a photographed paper ECG. A qualified cardiologist or physician must review the original tracing for any clinical decisions.
If the patient is symptomatic (chest pain, breathlessness, palpitations, syncope), this ECG should be reviewed urgently by a physician, as rate-related changes and subtle ischemic features require expert eyes on the original tracing.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.