attachment
attachment

Ecg findings not according machine but step by step with proper

Reading File
analyse_media
Here is a step-by-step manual ECG interpretation for this patient (Sunita Jagtap, 62F), going beyond what the machine printed:

🔷 ECG Parameters (from the strip header)

ParameterValue
Heart Rate88 bpm
RR interval684 ms
PR interval168 ms
QRS duration82 ms
QT interval354 ms
QTc432 ms
P axis48°
QRS axis28°
T axis121°

STEP 1 - RATE

Rate = 88 bpm - Normal (60-100 bpm range). Counted from the RR interval of 684 ms.

STEP 2 - RHYTHM

  • Regular rhythm - R-R intervals are consistent throughout all leads
  • P wave present before every QRS - Sinus origin confirmed
  • Conclusion: Normal Sinus Rhythm ✓ (Machine is correct here)

STEP 3 - AXIS

  • QRS Axis = +28° - Normal axis (normal range: -30° to +90°)
  • P axis = 48° - Normal
  • T axis = 121° - This is the KEY abnormality
⚠️ QRS-T angle = 121° - 28° = 93° - This is WIDE (normally <45°). A wide QRS-T angle is a marker of repolarization abnormality (strain or ischemia).

STEP 4 - P WAVE ANALYSIS

  • P wave duration ~102 ms - Normal (<120 ms)
  • P (II) amplitude = 0.13 mV - Normal
  • P wave morphology: upright in I, II, aVF - confirms sinus rhythm
  • No bifid or peaked P waves visible

STEP 5 - PR INTERVAL

  • 168 ms - Normal (120-200 ms)
  • No first, second, or third-degree AV block

STEP 6 - QRS COMPLEX

  • Duration 82 ms - Normal (<120 ms), so no bundle branch block
  • Morphology:
    • Lead I: Small R wave, visible S wave - slightly low voltage
    • Lead II: Upright QRS, reasonable amplitude
    • Lead III: Small QRS complexes
    • aVR: Predominantly negative (normal)
    • aVL: Low amplitude
    • V1: rS pattern (normal)
    • V2: Transitional
    • V4-V6: R-wave progression present
    • Sokolow-Lyon index (S(V1) + R(V5)) = R(V5) 1.74 mV - Sokolov total 2.67 mV - just below the traditional LVH threshold of 3.5 mV, but borderline

STEP 7 - ST SEGMENT ANALYSIS ⚠️ (Most Important)

This is where the manual reading differs significantly from the machine:

Leads I and aVL (High Lateral):

  • ST changes visible in I and aVL
  • Flattening or possible subtle ST depression in Lead I and aVL
  • These leads look at the high lateral wall (supplied by diagonal branch of LAD or circumflex)

Inferior Leads (II, III, aVF):

  • ST segment appears isoelectric with no significant elevation
  • No acute inferior STEMI pattern

Precordial Leads (V1-V6):

  • V1-V2: No significant ST elevation
  • V4-V6: ST segments appear relatively flat, possible minimal depression in V5-V6

Key Manual Observation:

The machine flagged "High Lateral Ischemia OR LV Strain" - manual review supports this:
  • ST-T changes in I/aVL = high lateral territory
  • Wide QRS-T axis angle + borderline voltage = LV strain pattern cannot be excluded

STEP 8 - T WAVE ANALYSIS ⚠️

  • T axis = 121° - Abnormal (should be within 45° of QRS axis of 28°)
  • T wave inversions or flattening likely in Leads I and/or aVL (high lateral)
  • T waves in V1-V3 appear upright (normal)
  • T waves in inferior leads appear positive (no inferior ischemia pattern)
  • The discordant T axis is the most objective marker of repolarization pathology

STEP 9 - QT / QTc

  • QT = 354 ms, QTc = 432 ms
  • In a 62-year-old female: upper limit of normal is ~460 ms for women
  • QTc is normal - no prolonged QT

STEP 10 - OVERALL INTERPRETATION (Manual)

FeatureFinding
RhythmNormal Sinus Rhythm
Rate88 bpm - Normal
AxisQRS normal (+28°), but T axis discordant (121°)
IntervalsAll normal
HypertrophyNo definitive LVH by voltage, but borderline
IschemiaST-T changes in leads I and aVL - High Lateral territory
PatternLV strain pattern possible given wide QRS-T angle

📋 CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE

The machine diagnosis is partially correct but incomplete:
  1. "ST & T Abnormality - High Lateral Ischemia or LV Strain" - Manual reading agrees with this concern
  2. However, the machine did NOT adequately flag the wide QRS-T axis angle (93°) as an independent repolarization marker
  3. The borderline Sokolov voltage + T axis discordance together suggest LV strain (as seen in hypertensive heart disease, LVH) is the more likely explanation in a 62F, rather than acute ischemia - unless the patient has chest pain or other acute symptoms

What to do next (clinically):

  • Compare with old ECG - if ST-T changes are new, urgent workup needed
  • Troponin levels - rule out NSTEMI
  • Echo - assess LV wall motion and hypertrophy
  • BP check - hypertensive LV strain is common in this demographic
⚠️ This is an unconfirmed machine report (as stated on the ECG). A qualified cardiologist must review the original tracing before any clinical decision.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.