I'll answer all the visible questions from your exam paper. Let me address each one systematically.---
Organic Chemistry — Complete Exam Answers
Q(c): Five Examples of Electrophilic Addition Reactions in Alkenes
General Mechanism: The π electrons of the alkene act as a nucleophile and attack an electrophile. This generates a carbocation intermediate (or a cyclic intermediate), which is then attacked by a nucleophile.
1. Addition of HBr (Hydrohalogenation) — Markovnikov's Rule
Reaction:
CH₂=CH₂ + HBr → CH₃–CH₂Br
Mechanism:
- Step 1: The π bond attacks H⁺ from HBr → more stable secondary or tertiary carbocation forms (Markovnikov's rule).
- Step 2: Br⁻ attacks the carbocation → product.
Example with propene:
CH₃–CH=CH₂ + HBr → CH₃–CHBr–CH₃ (2-bromopropane, major product)
2. Addition of H₂SO₄ (Acid-catalyzed Hydration)
Reaction:
CH₂=CH₂ + H₂SO₄ → CH₃–CH₂–OSO₃H → (H₂O) → CH₃CH₂OH
Mechanism:
- Step 1: Protonation of the double bond → carbocation (Markovnikov selectivity).
- Step 2: HSO₄⁻ attacks carbocation → alkyl hydrogen sulfate.
- Step 3: Hydrolysis with water → alcohol + H₂SO₄ regenerated.
3. Halogenation (Addition of Br₂/Cl₂)
Reaction:
CH₂=CH₂ + Br₂ → BrCH₂–CH₂Br (1,2-dibromoethane)
Mechanism:
- Step 1: The π cloud polarizes Br–Br → electrophilic Br⁺ adds to form a bromonium ion (cyclic, 3-membered ring with Br bridging).
- Step 2: Br⁻ attacks the bromonium ion from the back (anti addition) → anti vicinal dibromide.
Result: trans (anti) product; bromine water is decolorized — a classic test for unsaturation.
4. Halohydrin Formation (Addition of Br₂/H₂O)
Reaction:
CH₂=CH₂ + Br₂/H₂O → BrCH₂–CH₂OH (bromohydrin)
Mechanism:
- Step 1: Bromonium ion forms (same as above).
- Step 2: In aqueous medium, H₂O (better nucleophile than Br⁻ here) attacks the more substituted carbon of the bromonium ion → anti addition.
- Step 3: Proton loss → β-bromohydrin.
5. Oxymercuration–Demercuration (Addition of H and OH, Markovnikov)
Reaction:
R–CH=CH₂ →(Hg(OAc)₂/H₂O, then NaBH₄)→ R–CH(OH)–CH₃
Mechanism:
- Step 1: Hg(OAc)₂ acts as electrophile; forms mercurinium ion (like bromonium).
- Step 2: Water attacks the more substituted carbon (Markovnikov) → organomercury alcohol.
- Step 3: NaBH₄ reduces C–Hg bond → C–H. No rearrangement occurs.
Q(c) OR: E1cb Reaction Mechanism
E1cb = Elimination, Unimolecular, Conjugate Base
This mechanism proceeds in two steps and is favored when:
- The leaving group is poor (e.g., F, OH)
- The β-hydrogen is acidic (adjacent to EWG like –NO₂, –CN, –C=O)
- Strong base present
Mechanism Steps:
Step 1 (slow/rate-determining): A base removes the acidic β-hydrogen to form a carbanion (conjugate base of the substrate). This is the slow step.
Step 2 (fast): The leaving group departs from the carbanion intermediate → alkene forms.
Example: Elimination from 2-fluoroethanol
OH OH
| |
HO⁻ + H–CH₂–CH₂–F → ⁻CH₂–CH₂–F → CH₂=CH₂ + F⁻
(β-H abstracted) (carbanion)
Better Classic Example: Aldol-type substrate
From a β-halo carbonyl compound:
Base + H–CH(COCH₃)–CH₂F → [⁻C(COCH₃)–CH₂F] → CH₂=CHCOCH₃ + F⁻
(stabilized carbanion)
The carbanion is stabilized by the adjacent carbonyl — this is the hallmark of E1cb.
Key features:
| Feature | E1cb |
|---|
| Rate | Depends only on [substrate] and [base] |
| Intermediate | Carbanion |
| Leaving group | Can be poor (F, OH) |
| Favored by | EWG at α-carbon |
Q(d): Why Peroxide Effect (Kharasch Effect) is Observed with HBr but NOT with HF, HCl, or HI
The peroxide effect (also called anti-Markovnikov addition) occurs via a free radical chain mechanism initiated by peroxides (ROOR → 2 RO•).
The key reason it works only with HBr lies in thermodynamics — specifically the bond dissociation energies (BDE) of the H–X bonds and the exo/endothermicity of each propagation step.
Radical Chain Mechanism (for HBr):
Initiation:
ROOR → 2 RO• → RO• + H–Br → ROH + Br•
Propagation:
- Step 1: Br• adds to the less substituted carbon of the alkene → more stable secondary radical (anti-Markovnikov selectivity)
- Step 2: The carbon radical abstracts H from HBr → product + new Br•
Termination: radical + radical → stable molecule
Why only HBr?
The propagation steps must both be exothermic for a chain reaction to sustain itself. Consider each step for all HX:
| H–X | BDE (H–X) kcal/mol | Step 1: X• + alkene → C–X | Step 2: C• + H–X → C–H + X• | Both exothermic? |
|---|
| HF | 136 | C–F forms (very strong, exothermic ✓) | C–H formed, but must break strong H–F (136): endothermic ✗ | NO |
| HCl | 103 | C–Cl (weaker than C–F), barely exothermic | Breaking H–Cl (103) vs forming C–H (~99): slightly endothermic ✗ | NO |
| HBr | 87 | C–Br bond formed: exothermic ✓ | Break H–Br (87) to form C–H (99): exothermic ✓ | YES ✓ |
| HI | 71 | I• is very unreactive; addition to alkene is endothermic ✗ | C–H formed but C–I bond too weak: Step 1 fails | NO |
Summary of Specific Reasons:
- HF: H–F bond (136 kcal/mol) is too strong. Step 2 (H abstraction from HF) is highly endothermic — the chain cannot propagate.
- HCl: H–Cl bond is still strong enough that Step 2 is endothermic or thermoneutral. Cl• is also too reactive and less selective — doesn't add preferentially.
- HBr: Both steps are exothermic. Br• is reactive enough to add to alkenes but not so reactive that it lacks selectivity. The chain propagates efficiently.
- HI: I• is too unreactive (stable, large, polarizable radical) — it does not add readily to the π bond (Step 1 is endothermic). The chain cannot initiate.
Conclusion: HBr occupies the "Goldilocks" position — its BDE and the reactivity of Br• make both propagation steps thermodynamically favorable, which is not true for HF, HCl, or HI.
---You've run out of free credits. Sign up for a free account to continue using Orris.