Here is a comprehensive overview of all Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) Methods:
AST Methods in Microbiology
AST methods fall into four broad categories:
- Diffusion methods
- Dilution methods
- Gradient methods
- Automated/molecular methods
1. DIFFUSION METHODS
Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion (Most Common)
Principle: Antibiotic-impregnated disks are placed on an agar plate inoculated with the test organism. The antibiotic diffuses radially outward, creating a concentration gradient. Where the concentration falls below the MIC, bacteria grow freely - forming a zone of inhibition around the disk.
Procedure:
- Prepare a 0.5 McFarland bacterial suspension (~1.5 × 10⁸ CFU/mL)
- Inoculate Mueller-Hinton Agar (MHA) by lawn method
- Place antibiotic disks (6 mm) at least 15 mm apart
- Incubate at 35-37°C for 16-18 hours
- Measure zone diameter in millimeters
Result Interpretation (per CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints):
| Category | Abbreviation | Meaning |
|---|
| Susceptible | S | Standard dose will work |
| Intermediate / Susceptible at increased exposure | I | Higher dose or frequent dosing needed |
| Resistant | R | Drug unlikely to work at any dose |
Advantages: Cheap, easy, flexible antibiotic selection, detects atypical phenotypes
Disadvantages: Cannot give exact MIC value, qualitative only, not for slow-growing or fastidious organisms
2. DILUTION METHODS
These are quantitative - they give the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), which is the lowest concentration of an antibiotic that completely inhibits visible bacterial growth.
A. Broth Macrodilution
- Serial two-fold dilutions of antibiotic in broth tubes (e.g., 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8... µg/mL)
- Each tube inoculated with ~5 × 10⁵ CFU/mL
- Incubated 16-20 hours at 35°C
- Lowest clear (no turbidity) tube = MIC
- Largely replaced by microdilution; rarely used today
B. Broth Microdilution (Gold Standard - BMD)
- Same principle as macrodilution but performed in 96-well microplates
- Each well contains 100 µL of antibiotic at doubling concentrations
- Reference method endorsed by CLSI and EUCAST
- Results: MIC in µg/mL, then interpreted against breakpoints
- Can test multiple antibiotics simultaneously
Advantages: Quantitative MIC, high throughput, reference standard
Disadvantages: Labor-intensive if done manually, requires careful preparation
C. Agar Dilution
- Antibiotic serially diluted and incorporated into molten agar before pouring
- Bacterial suspensions spotted/inoculated onto each agar plate
- Multiple organisms can be tested on same plate
- Lowest concentration agar with no visible growth = MIC
- Used in research settings, less common clinically
3. GRADIENT METHOD (Etest / MIC Strip)
Principle: Combines diffusion + dilution in one step. A plastic strip with a predefined, continuous gradient of antibiotic (from high to low concentration along its length) is placed on inoculated agar. The antibiotic diffuses into the agar, and a teardrop/ellipse-shaped zone of inhibition forms around the strip. The MIC is read directly where the ellipse intersects the strip's MIC scale.
Commercial products:
- Etest (bioMérieux) - most widely used
- MIC Test Strip (Liofilchem)
- M.I.C. Evaluator (Oxoid)
- Ezy MIC Strip (HiMedia)
Advantages: Simple, gives quantitative MIC, good for fastidious organisms (using enriched media), high agreement with BMD (~94-96%)
Disadvantages: Expensive for large panels, subjective MIC reading, storage challenges (pH-sensitive antibiotics)
4. AUTOMATED SYSTEMS
Instruments that perform miniaturized broth microdilution automatically, read growth turbidimetrically or fluorometrically, and report MIC + susceptibility category rapidly.
| System | Manufacturer | Turnaround |
|---|
| VITEK 2 | bioMérieux | 6-10 hours |
| MicroScan WalkAway | Beckman Coulter | 6-16 hours |
| Phoenix | BD Diagnostics | 6-16 hours |
| Sensititre ARIS | Thermo Fisher | 18-24 hours |
Advantages: Fast, reproducible, auto-interpretation with CLSI/EUCAST rules, simultaneous ID + AST
Disadvantages: Expensive equipment, may miss unusual resistance (e.g., heteroresistance, inducible resistance), software-dependent
5. MOLECULAR METHODS
Detect resistance genes rather than phenotypic growth inhibition.
| Method | Target | Examples |
|---|
| PCR | Resistance genes | mecA (MRSA), vanA/B (VRE), blaKPC (carbapenemase) |
| Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) | Entire resistome | Research + outbreak investigation |
| MALDI-TOF + resistance detection | Protein profile | Beta-lactamase hydrolysis assays |
Turnaround: 1-6 hours
Advantages: Very fast, detects resistance directly in clinical specimens without culture
Disadvantages: High cost, only detects known/targeted genes, a gene present does not always mean phenotypic resistance (gene expression may be absent)
Comparison Summary
| Method | Type | Gives MIC? | Speed | Cost | Gold Standard? |
|---|
| Disk Diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) | Qualitative | No | 18-24 h | Low | Routine |
| Broth Macrodilution | Quantitative | Yes | 18-24 h | Moderate | Obsolete |
| Broth Microdilution | Quantitative | Yes | 18-24 h | Moderate | Yes (CLSI/EUCAST) |
| Agar Dilution | Quantitative | Yes | 18-24 h | High | Research |
| Etest/Gradient Strip | Quantitative | Yes | 18-24 h | Moderate-High | Supplement |
| Automated (VITEK 2 etc.) | Quantitative | Yes | 6-16 h | High | Clinical workhorse |
| Molecular (PCR/WGS) | Genotypic | No (genotype) | 1-6 h | Very High | Supplement |
Key Standards Bodies
- CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) - USA
- EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) - Europe
Both publish breakpoint tables that define S / I / R categories for every drug-organism combination. Laboratories must follow one standard consistently.