Right. Write notes on... Red gangrene, red gangrene... Dry gangrene. Wet gangrene. Gas gangrene. From Bailey and Love, each for 25 marks. For my final year MBBS examination to get a distinction marks. Search.

Reading File
Now let me search Bailey & Love for all three types of gangrene simultaneously.
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
I have the Bailey & Love file paths. Now let me read all the relevant sections in parallel.
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
I now have the core content. Let me read further in block 8 to get details on dry/wet gangrene management, and also get diabetic gangrene content for completeness.
Reading File
I now have comprehensive content from Bailey & Love. Let me compile the full distinction-level notes.

Gangrene - Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery (28th Ed.)

Final Year MBBS Examination Notes - 25 Marks Each


DEFINITION

Gangrene refers to the death of macroscopic portions of tissue, which turns black because of the breakdown of haemoglobin and the formation of iron sulphide. It usually affects the most distal part of a limb because of arterial obstruction (from thrombosis, embolus or arteritis).
(Bailey & Love, p. 1030)

1. DRY GANGRENE (25 Marks)

Definition

Dry gangrene occurs when tissues are desiccated by gradual slowing of the blood-stream. It is typically the result of atheromatous (atherosclerotic) occlusion of arteries.

Aetiology

  • Gradual progressive arterial occlusion - commonest cause is atherosclerosis
  • Other causes: Buerger's disease (thromboangiitis obliterans), Raynaud's disease, severe frostbite, ergotism
  • The key feature is that occlusion is gradual, allowing collateral circulation to partially develop, preventing superadded infection

Pathology

  • Gradual arterial obstruction leads to progressive ischaemia
  • Venous return is also impaired; fluid cannot enter the dead tissue
  • Tissue dries out, shrivels and becomes mummified
  • Haemoglobin breaks down to iron sulphide - produces the black discolouration
  • The part becomes hard, dry, shrunken, and wrinkled (like a mummy)
  • Putrefaction is absent or minimal as the dry, avascular tissue resists bacterial growth

Clinical Features

FeatureDescription
ColourInitially pale/white, then blue/purple, finally black
ConsistencyHard, dry, shrivelled, mummified
OdourAbsent or minimal (no putrefaction)
SensationPainless (nerves are dead)
TemperatureCold to touch
SkinWrinkled, shrunken
Line of demarcationClear, well-defined

Line of Demarcation

  • A zone of demarcation between truly viable and dead tissue will eventually appear
  • Separation is achieved by the development of granulation tissue between dead and living parts
  • In dry gangrene, if blood supply of proximal tissues is adequate, the final line of demarcation appears in a matter of days and separation occurs neatly and with minimum of infection
  • If bone is involved, complete separation takes longer; the stump tends to be conical as bone has a better blood supply than its coverings

Management

  1. Conservative - Allow dry gangrene to demarcate spontaneously; no soaking or ointments needed
  2. Treat underlying cause - Arteriography and revascularisation (bypass surgery or angioplasty) to improve proximal circulation
  3. Surgical debridement - After demarcation, conservative amputation at the lowest viable level
  4. Major limb amputation - Required when: blood supply cannot be improved, life-threatening sepsis develops, limb non-functional

Key Principle

Amputation in the presence of poor circulation will fail - gangrene will reappear in wound edges. The arterial supply must be assessed and improved first.

2. WET GANGRENE (25 Marks)

Definition

Wet gangrene occurs when superadded infection and putrefaction are present alongside tissue death. It is a surgical emergency.

Aetiology

  • Sudden arterial occlusion (e.g., embolism) with no time for collateral circulation to develop
  • The venous drainage continues briefly, allowing oedema and bacterial invasion
  • Predisposing factors: diabetes mellitus, immunocompromised state, venous outflow obstruction

Pathology

  • Sudden arterial blockage leads to rapid tissue necrosis
  • The affected part is oedematous (venous return initially maintained)
  • Putrefactive bacteria (saprophytes) invade the necrotic tissue
  • Putrefaction releases gases - hence crepitus may be present
  • Tissue liquefaction occurs
  • Haemoglobin breakdown produces the black/green discolouration
  • Toxins released by bacteria are absorbed systemically - patient becomes severely ill/septic

Clinical Features

FeatureDescription
ColourBlack, green, dark mottled discolouration
ConsistencySoft, oedematous, friable
OdourFoul, offensive (putrefaction)
SensationInitially painful, later anaesthetic
TemperatureCold
CrepitusMay be present (gas-forming organisms)
Line of demarcationIll-defined, spreads proximally
Systemic featuresFever, toxaemia, septic shock

Line of Demarcation

  • In moist gangrene, the infection and suppuration extend into the neighbouring living tissue, causing the final line of demarcation to be more proximal than in dry gangrene
  • If arterial supply to proximal living tissue is poor, the line of demarcation is very slow to form or may not develop at all
  • Gangrene may spread to adjacent tissues or appear as 'skip' areas further up the limb on the other side of the foot, the heel, dorsum, or even the calf

Differences from Dry Gangrene

FeatureDry GangreneWet Gangrene
OnsetGradualSudden
CauseAtherosclerosisEmbolism/Diabetic infection
TissueMummified, dryOedematous, soft
OdourAbsentFoul
InfectionAbsent/minimalPresent and spreading
ToxaemiaAbsentPresent
DemarcationClear, neatIndistinct, spreads proximally
UrgencyLess urgentSurgical emergency

Management

  1. Emergency surgery - Urgent debridement or amputation - this is a surgical emergency
  2. IV antibiotics - Broad-spectrum covering aerobic and anaerobic organisms
  3. Resuscitation - IV fluids, correction of septic shock
  4. Control underlying disease - Especially diabetes mellitus
  5. Revascularisation - Where possible, to improve limb salvage
  6. Amputation level - Higher than in dry gangrene due to proximal spread of infection

3. GAS GANGRENE (25 Marks)

Definition

Gas gangrene is a rapidly fatal, necrotising soft tissue infection caused by Clostridium perfringens (formerly Clostridium welchii) and characterised by gas production in the tissues and severe systemic toxicity.
(Bailey & Love, p. 479 and p. 66)

Causative Organism

  • Clostridium perfringens - Gram-positive, anaerobic, spore-bearing bacilli
  • Widely found in nature, particularly in soil and faeces
  • Spores survive in soil for years

Predisposing Factors / At-Risk Patients

  • Immunocompromised patients
  • Diabetic patients
  • Patients with malignant disease
  • Wounds containing necrotic or foreign material (anaerobic conditions)
  • Military wounds - high-velocity missiles or shrapnel cause extensive tissue damage; the cavitation following passage of a missile creates a 'sucking' entry wound, leaving clothing and environmental soiling in addition to devascularised tissue
  • Amputations performed for peripheral vascular disease with open necrotic ulceration

Pathogenesis

  • Contaminated wound provides anaerobic environment ideal for Clostridium to germinate from spores
  • Organism releases powerful exotoxins:
    • Alpha toxin (lecithinase/phospholipase C) - most important; causes haemolysis, myonecrosis, platelet destruction
    • Collagenase - breaks down connective tissue
    • Hyaluronidase - facilitates spread through tissue planes
    • Other proteases
  • Gas (mainly CO₂ and H₂) produced by bacterial metabolism accumulates in tissues
  • Rapid local spread → circulatory collapse → multi-organ failure

Clinical Features

Local Features

FeatureDescription
PainSevere local wound pain (often the first and most alarming symptom - disproportionate to appearance)
CrepitusGas in the tissues - palpable crepitus; may also be visible on plain radiographs
Wound exudateThin, brown, sweet-smelling discharge
Gram stainReveals Gram-positive bacilli in wound discharge
OedemaSpreading oedema around wound
Skin colourInitially tense and pale, then bronze/red, then black necrotic patches

Systemic Features (Rapid Onset)

  • High fever, tachycardia, hypotension
  • Haemolysis and haemolytic anaemia
  • Circulatory collapse
  • Organ failure (renal, hepatic)
  • Death if not treated promptly

Investigations

  1. Plain X-ray - Gas in the soft tissues (pathognomonic)
  2. CT scan - Extent of gas and tissue involvement
  3. Wound swab - Gram stain (Gram-positive bacilli, no pus cells)
  4. Blood cultures
  5. FBC - Haemolytic anaemia, leucocytosis
  6. Renal and hepatic function tests

Treatment (Summary box 5.9 / Summary box 33.9)

1. Surgical (Most Important)

  • Radical and regular surgical excision of all affected tissue is the cornerstone of treatment
  • Wound should be widely opened and all necrotic muscle excised
  • Re-examine wound at 24-48 hours and repeat debridement as needed ("radical and regular" surgical excision)
  • Early amputation may be life-saving - do not delay when limb is extensively involved
  • Fasciotomy to decompress compartments

2. Antibiotic Therapy

  • Large doses of IV penicillin (Penicillin G) - drug of choice
  • Metronidazole - additional anaerobic cover
  • Antibiotic prophylaxis should always be considered in patients at risk, especially when amputations are performed for peripheral vascular disease with open necrotic ulceration

3. Supportive

  • High-dose oxygen (the organism is anaerobic; high-oxygen environment is bacteriostatic)
  • Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) - where available; inhibits toxin production and bacterial growth
  • Aggressive IV fluid resuscitation
  • Correction of haemolytic anaemia
  • Intensive care management for organ support
  • Antitoxin (where available)

Summary Box (Bailey & Love)

  • Caused by C. perfringens
  • Spores are present in soil
  • Thrives in anaerobic conditions and produces many exotoxins
  • Treat with radical and regular surgical excision
  • Give oxygen and penicillin
  • Early amputation may be life-saving

QUICK COMPARISON TABLE - All Three Types

FeatureDry GangreneWet GangreneGas Gangrene
CauseAtherosclerosis (gradual occlusion)Embolism/Diabetes (sudden occlusion + infection)Clostridium perfringens
MechanismIschaemic desiccationIschaemia + putrefactive infectionNecrotising infection + gas production
OnsetGradualAcuteFulminant
Tissue textureDry, hard, mummifiedSoft, oedematousGas-filled, crepitant
OdourNoneFoul (putrid)Sweet-smelling
CrepitusAbsentMay be presentPathognomonic
Line of demarcationSharp, well-definedIndistinct, proximal spreadRapid, spreading
Systemic toxicityAbsentPresent (septicaemia)Severe - circulatory collapse
ColourBlack, dryBlack/green, moistBronze/brown, then black
X-rayNormalNormalGas in soft tissues
TreatmentRevascularise + conservative amputationEmergency debridement + amputation + IV antibioticsRadical excision + IV penicillin + oxygen ± HBO + early amputation
UrgencyElective/Semi-urgentEmergencyAbsolute emergency

IMPORTANT POINTS FOR 25-MARK ANSWER STRUCTURE

When writing each answer in the exam, structure as:
  1. Definition (2 marks)
  2. Aetiology / Causes (3 marks)
  3. Pathology (5 marks)
  4. Clinical Features (5 marks)
  5. Investigations (3 marks)
  6. Treatment / Management (5 marks)
  7. Complications (2 marks)
All content above is sourced directly from Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th Edition, chapters on Vascular Surgery (Ch. 61, pp. 1030-1031) and Surgical Infections (Ch. 5, pp. 66-67) and Trauma (Ch. 33, p. 479).

Sterilisation side effects

Asking for Preferences
Female sterilisation (tubal ligation) can cause immediate surgical complications as well as long-term hormonal and menstrual effects. The classic concern is "post-tubal ligation syndrome" - menstrual irregularity, pelvic pain, and regret. Let me pull the full picture from authoritative textbooks.
Searching sources...
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Excellent - Berek & Novak has a dedicated section on "Late Sequelae" and "Risks of Tubal Sterilization". Let me read those now.
Reading File
I have very rich and detailed content. Let me now compile the comprehensive notes.

Female Sterilisation (Tubal Ligation) - Side Effects & Complications

Source: Berek & Novak's Gynecology, Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22E, Sabiston Textbook of Surgery

OVERVIEW

Female sterilisation (tubal sterilisation) is one of the most widely used contraceptive methods worldwide (~219 million users as of 2022). Despite being highly effective and generally safe, it carries a range of short-term and long-term side effects that every clinician must know.

A. IMMEDIATE / SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS

1. Anaesthesia-Related

  • Most serious complications are related to general anaesthesia
  • Risk of death: 1-2 per 100,000 sterilisations (largely anaesthesia-related)
  • Regional/local anaesthesia is safer

2. Surgical Complications

ComplicationNotes
Haemorrhage / haematomaBleeding from mesosalpinx vessels
Bowel injuryEspecially with laparoscopy; may be delayed diagnosis
Bladder/ureter injuryDuring dissection
Wound infectionMore common with minilaparotomy
Pelvic abscessParticularly with vaginal approach (now rarely used)
Subcutaneous emphysemaCO₂ insufflation in laparoscopy
Gas embolismRare but potentially fatal (laparoscopy)
Conversion to laparotomy~1% of laparoscopic cases

3. Thermal/Electrical Burns (Electrocautery)

  • Bowel burns from unipolar diathermy - can present days later with peritonitis
  • Use of bipolar cautery significantly reduces this risk
  • Thermal damage to adjacent structures (ureter, bowel)

B. FAILURE RATES (Pregnancy After Sterilisation)

This is one of the most important "side effects" - the procedure is not 100% effective.
MethodFailure Rate (per 1,000 cases)
Pomeroy / Partial salpingectomy1-4 per 1,000
Bipolar cauteryHigher long-term failure (4-5%)
Hulka clipHigher failure than cautery
Silastic band (Falope ring)~1-3 per 1,000
Irving methodVirtually zero
Uchida methodVirtually zero (20,000+ cases, no pregnancies)
Important: The 10-year cumulative failure rate for all methods combined is approximately 1.85% (CREST study). Bipolar cautery has the highest long-term failure rate, especially in young women.

C. ECTOPIC PREGNANCY (Critical Side Effect)

  • If sterilisation fails, there is a significantly increased risk of ectopic (tubal) pregnancy
  • The risk of ectopic pregnancy is highest with bipolar electrocoagulation failure
  • 10-year ectopic pregnancy rate after sterilisation failure: up to 32% of all failures with bipolar cautery are ectopic
  • Previous tubal surgery including sterilisation is listed as a major risk factor for ectopic pregnancy (Bailey & Love, 28th Ed.)
  • Key teaching point: A woman who becomes pregnant after sterilisation must be assumed to have an ectopic pregnancy until proven otherwise

D. LONG-TERM / LATE SEQUELAE

1. Menstrual Disturbances ("Post-Tubal Ligation Syndrome")

"Increased menstrual irregularity and pain are attributed to previous tubal sterilisation. Study of the problem is complicated by the fact that many women develop these symptoms as they age..." - Berek & Novak's Gynecology
Reported changes:
  • Heavier periods (menorrhagia)
  • Increased menstrual pain (dysmenorrhoea)
  • Cycle irregularity
  • Intermenstrual bleeding
Important caveat: The CREST study showed that women who had used oral contraceptives before sterilisation often develop menstrual irregularities after stopping the pill - not because of the sterilisation itself, but because the pill had been masking underlying cycle changes. The evidence for a true "post-tubal ligation syndrome" is contested.

2. Pelvic Pain

  • Chronic pelvic pain reported in some women post-sterilisation
  • May relate to adhesion formation, hydrosalpinx, or congestion
  • Difficult to distinguish from pre-existing conditions

3. Ovarian Function - Possible Disruption

  • Interruption of blood supply to the ovary via the mesosalpinx may affect ovarian reserve (particularly with salpingectomy)
  • Some studies suggest reduced ovarian reserve after salpingectomy
  • Effect is minimal with clip/ring methods

4. Regret

  • Regret is one of the most significant "side effects" of sterilisation
  • Up to 20-26% of women express regret at some point
  • Risk factors for regret:
    • Young age at time of sterilisation (highest risk: <25 years)
    • Change of partner
    • Death of a child
    • Financial/social pressure rather than personal choice
    • Sterilisation done at time of other procedure (post-partum) - decision made under emotional or physical stress
  • Reversal (reanastomosis) success rates are variable (40-80%) and depend on method used and amount of tube remaining

E. PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS

  • Generally high levels of satisfaction reported
  • Some women report grief or loss after sterilisation, particularly if done under pressure
  • Sexual dysfunction - rare; most studies show no significant change or improvement (relief from pregnancy anxiety)

F. PROTECTIVE EFFECTS (Important for Exams)

Some side effects are actually beneficial:
BenefitEvidence
Reduced ovarian cancer risk~34% reduction in risk of ovarian cancer (strong evidence); this is the basis for recommending opportunistic salpingectomy at time of other surgeries
Reduced endometrial cancer riskSome evidence
No hormonal effectsUnlike OCP - no systemic hormonal side effects
Current recommendation: Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (complete removal of tubes) at the time of other pelvic surgery is increasingly recommended over tubal ligation, as it is more effective AND reduces ovarian cancer risk, since many "ovarian" cancers actually originate in the fallopian tube fimbriae. (Sabiston Textbook of Surgery)

G. COMPARISON BY METHOD - Side Effect Profile

MethodMain Side Effect Concern
Bipolar cauteryHighest ectopic rate on failure; possible ovarian blood supply disruption
Unipolar cauteryBowel burns (thermal injury); largely abandoned
Hulka/Filshie clipBest reversal potential; low complication rate
Silastic band (Falope ring)Significant immediate post-op pain; some risk of mesosalpinx tearing
Pomeroy techniqueModerate failure rate; good for reversal
Complete salpingectomyPossible effect on ovarian reserve; reduces ovarian cancer risk

SUMMARY TABLE

CategoryKey Side Effects
ImmediateHaemorrhage, bowel/bladder injury, anaesthetic risk, thermal burns
FailurePregnancy (~1-4/1,000), ectopic pregnancy (up to 32% of failures with cautery)
Long-termMenstrual changes, pelvic pain, regret (up to 26%)
PsychologicalRegret, occasional emotional distress
BeneficialNo hormones, reduced ovarian cancer risk (with salpingectomy)

EXAM KEY POINTS

  1. Ectopic pregnancy after failed sterilisation is a surgical emergency - always suspect it
  2. Regret is common and highest in women sterilised under 25
  3. The "post-tubal ligation syndrome" is contested in the literature
  4. Salpingectomy is now preferred over tubal ligation in many centres - more effective AND reduces ovarian cancer risk
  5. Bipolar cautery has the highest long-term failure rate
  6. Death rate is 1-2 per 100,000, mostly due to anaesthesia
  7. Male sterilisation (vasectomy) incurs less risk and is more effective than female sterilisation (Sabiston)

Condom failure rate

The condom failure rate depends on whether you measure perfect use vs typical use:
  • Perfect use: ~2% per year (2 pregnancies per 100 women)
  • Typical use: ~13-18% per year
Searching sources...
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
I have the full data table from Goldman-Cecil Medicine. Here is the complete answer:

Condom Failure Rate

Source: Goldman-Cecil Medicine (International Edition), TABLE 220-1 - "Percentage of Women Experiencing an Unintended Pregnancy During the First Year of Use"

The Key Numbers

Condom TypeTypical UsePerfect UseContinuation at 1 Year
Male condom18%2%43%
Female condom21%5%41%
"Typical use" = real-world use with inconsistent or incorrect technique "Perfect use" = used correctly and consistently every single time

What These Numbers Mean

  • Male condom, typical use - 18%: Out of 100 women whose partners use male condoms for one year, 18 will become pregnant
  • Male condom, perfect use - 2%: With perfect technique every time, only 2 per 100 women become pregnant in a year
  • The enormous gap between 2% and 18% reflects human error - incorrect application, breakage, slippage, not used every time

Comparison with Other Methods (from the Same Table)

MethodTypical UsePerfect Use
No method at all85%85%
Spermicide alone28%18%
Withdrawal22%4%
Female condom21%5%
Male condom18%2%
Diaphragm12%6%
Combined OCP / Patch / Ring9%0.3%
Depot medroxyprogesterone (Depo-Provera)6%0.2%
Copper IUD0.8%0.6%
Hormonal IUD (Mirena)0.1-0.2%0.1-0.2%
Female sterilisation~0.5%~0.5%
Vasectomy0.15%0.10%
Implant (Implanon)0.05%0.05%

Why the Gap is So Large for Condoms

Reasons typical use fails significantly more than perfect use:
  1. Incorrect application - putting it on after partial penetration, leaving no space at the tip
  2. Breakage - using wrong lubricants (oil-based lubricants damage latex), expired condoms, wrong size
  3. Slippage - during withdrawal, especially if erection subsides
  4. Inconsistent use - not using it every time
  5. Storage damage - heat (wallet, glove box), prolonged storage
  6. Failure to use throughout - removed before ejaculation or not put on before any contact

Additional Points for Exams

  • STI protection: Male condoms are the only contraceptive method that also protects against sexually transmitted infections (HIV, gonorrhoea, chlamydia, etc.) - this is their major advantage over all other methods
  • Latex allergy: Use polyurethane or polyisoprene condoms as an alternative
  • Female condom: Larger failure rate than male condom with typical use (21% vs 18%), but empowers women to control protection; also provides STI protection
  • Adolescents: Male condom is the most used birth control among adolescents with a failure rate of 18% typical use (Harriet Lane Handbook, 23rd Ed.)
  • Dual protection: Condom + another method (e.g., OCP) is recommended for both contraception and STI prevention

Bottom line for exams: Male condom = 2% perfect use, 18% typical use. The gap is the key teaching point - user error accounts for nearly all failures.

Side effects of I pill

The I-Pill is a levonorgestrel 1.5 mg emergency contraceptive pill (ECP). Common side effects include nausea, vomiting, headache, irregular bleeding, and breast tenderness. Let me get the full clinical picture from textbooks.
Searching sources...
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Excellent - comprehensive data obtained. Here is the complete answer:

I-Pill (Levonorgestrel 1.5 mg) - Side Effects

Sources: Berek & Novak's Gynecology | Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22E | Roberts & Hedges' Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine

What is the I-Pill?

The I-Pill is the Indian brand name for Levonorgestrel 1.5 mg - a progestin-only emergency contraceptive pill (ECP), taken as a single tablet within 72 hours (ideally within 24 hours) of unprotected intercourse. It is identical to Plan B One-Step (USA), Postinor, and other global generics.
Mechanism of action: Primarily delays or inhibits ovulation. It does NOT work if ovulation has already occurred - it is NOT an abortifacient. (Berek & Novak's Gynecology)
Efficacy: Prevents 89% of pregnancies that would otherwise have occurred. Overall failure rate: 1-3%. (Harrison's 22E; Roberts & Hedges)

SIDE EFFECTS

A. Gastrointestinal (Most Common)

Side EffectFrequencyNotes
Nausea~23%Much less than the old Yuzpe (combined ECP) regimen (50%)
Vomiting~5.6%If vomiting occurs within 1 hour of dose, repeat the dose. Consider prophylactic antiemetic
Abdominal pain/crampingCommonUsually mild and self-limiting
"Nausea and vomiting occurred much less frequently with levonorgestrel alone (23.1% vs 50.5%, and 5.6% vs 18.8% respectively) compared to the combined EE/levonorgestrel method." - Berek & Novak's Gynecology

B. Menstrual Disturbances (Very Common)

Side EffectDetails
Irregular vaginal bleedingSpotting or breakthrough bleeding in the days after taking the pill - very common
Early next periodNext menstrual period may arrive earlier than expected
Delayed next periodMay also be delayed by a few days - if >1 week late, do a pregnancy test
Heavier or lighter periodCycle may be temporarily disrupted
These menstrual changes are the most common complaint after taking the I-Pill and are normal and temporary.

C. Other Common Side Effects

Side EffectNotes
Fatigue / dizzinessMild, transient
HeadacheCommon
Breast tendernessDue to progestogenic effect on breast tissue
Lower abdominal painCramping, usually mild

D. Serious / Rare Side Effects

Side EffectNotes
Ectopic pregnancyIf the pill fails AND fertilisation occurs, there is a risk of ectopic pregnancy. This is not caused by the pill but is important to watch for. Any pain + missed period = rule out ectopic
Thrombotic eventsReported only with the older combined (oestrogen + levonorgestrel) regimen (Yuzpe). No such complications reported with levonorgestrel alone (Berek & Novak)
Allergic reactionVery rare - rash, urticaria

E. Effect on Fertility

  • No long-term effect on fertility - the I-Pill does not affect future fertility
  • It should not be used as a regular contraceptive (hence "emergency" pill)
  • Repeated use causes more frequent menstrual disturbances and is less reliable than regular contraception

F. Effect in Obese Women (Important Exam Point)

  • Reduced efficacy in obese women (BMI >30): Risk of pregnancy is 4.41 times higher in obese women taking levonorgestrel vs normal weight women (Berek & Novak)
  • For obese women, ulipristal acetate (Ella, 30 mg) is preferred, OR a copper IUD (most effective emergency contraceptive of all)

Comparison of Side Effect Profiles

FeatureI-Pill (Levonorgestrel 1.5 mg)Old Yuzpe Regimen (Oestrogen + LNG)
Nausea23%50.5%
Vomiting5.6%18.8%
Thrombosis riskNone reportedRare case reports
Efficacy89% prevention~75% prevention
Pregnancy rate~1.1-2%~3.2%

Practical Counselling Points

  1. Take it as early as possible - most effective within 24 hours; effective up to 72 hours; WHO allows up to 120 hours with reduced efficacy
  2. Nausea is common - taking it with food helps. If vomiting within 1 hour, repeat the dose and consider an antiemetic (domperidone/metoclopramide)
  3. Next period may be irregular - this is normal and not a sign of pregnancy
  4. If next period is >1 week late - do a urine pregnancy test
  5. The I-Pill does NOT protect against STIs
  6. It should NOT be used as routine contraception - it is less effective than regular methods and causes more cycle disruption with repeated use
  7. Not an abortion pill - it works before fertilisation, not after

Key exam summary: I-Pill = Levonorgestrel 1.5 mg. Main side effects = nausea (23%), irregular bleeding, headache, breast tenderness, fatigue. Serious risk if fails = ectopic pregnancy. Reduced efficacy in obese women. No thrombosis risk (unlike old oestrogen-containing ECP).
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.