Create comprehensive postgraduate (MD/DM/DNB Internal Medicine) notes on Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) based primarily on Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine (22nd Edition), supplemented with the latest ESC/ERS Pulmonary Hypertension Guidelines (2022/2025 updates where applicable). The notes should be detailed, clinically oriented, and suitable for postgraduate examinations and superspecialty Cover the following sections in depth: 1. Definition * Historical and current hemodynamic definition * Normal pulmonary circulation * Normal pulmonary artery pressure, PAWP, PVR, and cardiac output * Changes from previous definitions 2. Epidemiology * Global prevalence and incidence * Age and sex distribution * Major etiologies worldwide and in India * Prognosis and survival 3. Etiology * Detailed WHO Clinical Classification (Groups 1–5) * Causes under each group * Risk factors * Genetic mutations (BMPR2, ALK1, ENG, EIF2AK4, etc.) 4. Pulmonary Circulation Physiology * Anatomy * Pulmonary vascular resistance * Right ventricular–pulmonary artery coupling * Pulmonary vascular compliance 5. Pathophysiology * Endothelial dysfunction * Nitric oxide pathway * Prostacyclin pathway * Endothelin pathway * Vascular remodeling * Plexiform lesions * In-situ thrombosis * Inflammation * Right ventricular adaptation and failure * Flowcharts explaining disease progression 6. Hemodynamic Classification * Pre-capillary PH * Isolated post-capillary PH * Combined pre- and post-capillary PH * Definitions using mPAP, PAWP, PVR, and DPG * Clinical examples 7. WHO Clinical Classification (Groups 1–5) * Detailed explanation * Examples * Characteristic hemodynamics * Characteristic pathology * Common investigations 8. Clinical Features * Symptoms * Physical examination * WHO Functional Class * Signs of right heart failure * Red flag features 9. Diagnostic Approach * Stepwise diagnostic algorithm * Clinical suspicion * ECG * Chest X-ray * Echocardiography * Pulmonary function tests * HRCT chest * CT pulmonary angiography * V/Q scan * Cardiac MRI * Blood investigations * Biomarkers * Right heart catheterization * Vasoreactivity testing * Interpretation of hemodynamic data * Diagnostic flowchart 10. Investigations * Findings in each investigation * Advantages * Limitations * Diagnostic accuracy * Interpretation 11. Risk Stratification * ESC/ERS risk model * WHO Functional Class * BNP/NT-proBNP * Six-minute walk test * CPET * Echocardiographic markers * Hemodynamic markers 12. Treatment * General measures * Supportive therapy * Oxygen * Diuretics * Digoxin * Anticoagulation * Iron therapy * Vaccination * Pregnancy considerations * Rehabilitation 13. PAH-Specific Therapy * Endothelin receptor antagonists * PDE-5 inhibitors * Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators * Prostacyclin analogues * Prostacyclin receptor agonists * Calcium channel blockers * Drug indications * Contraindications * Adverse effects * Combination therapy * Initial and sequential treatment algorithms 14. Management According to WHO Groups * Group 1 * Group 2 * Group 3 * Group 4 (including pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty) * Group 5 15. Special Situations * Pregnancy * Congenital heart disease * Connective tissue disease-associated PAH * Portopulmonary hypertension * HIV-associated PAH * CTEPH 16. Complications * Right ventricular failure * Arrhythmias * Hemoptysis * Syncope * Sudden cardiac death 17. Prognosis * Prognostic factors * REVEAL score * Survival predictors 18. Important Tables * WHO Groups * Pre- vs Post-capillary PH * Investigation comparison * Drug comparison * Vasodilator classes * Hemodynamic definitions * Functional classes 19. Flowcharts * Diagnostic approach * Pathophysiology * Treatment algorithm * Right heart catheterization interpretation * Management by WHO group 20. High-Yield Exam Pearls * Harrison’s key points * Frequently asked MD/DNB/DM examination questions * Recent guideline updates * Common viva questions * Clinical pearls * Mnemonics Output requirements: * Use clear headings and subheadings. * Include detailed explanations, flowcharts, tables, and summary boxes. * Emphasize important examination points * Highlight differences between Harrison’s concepts and the latest ESC/ERS guidelines where relevant. Make text paste

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"pulmonary hypertension"[MeSH Terms] AND "guideline"[pt]

Searching the Web

ESC ERS pulmonary hypertension guidelines 2022 2025 updates key changes hemodynamic definition

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"pulmonary hypertension" AND "ESC" AND "guidelines" AND "2022"

Reading File
Reading File
Reading Web Page

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10971453

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File

PULMONARY HYPERTENSION

Comprehensive Postgraduate Notes (MD/DM/DNB Internal Medicine)

Primary Source: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22nd Edition (2025)

Supplemented: 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines (Humbert M et al., Eur Heart J 2022)


SECTION 1: DEFINITION

1.1 Historical Definition

  • Pre-2018 (historical): Pulmonary hypertension was defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25 mmHg at rest, measured by right heart catheterization (RHC). This threshold was arbitrary and chosen to avoid overdiagnosis in mild disease.
  • The 25 mmHg cutoff was used in clinical guidelines from 2009 and 2015 ESC/ERS editions.

1.2 Current Hemodynamic Definition (2018 WSPH / 2022 ESC-ERS)

PH = mPAP > 20 mmHg at rest, measured by right heart catheterization (RHC)
Rationale for change: A 2009 literature review of >1100 healthy individuals established normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg. Two standard deviations above the mean = 14 + 6.6 = ~20.6 mmHg. Therefore, mPAP >20 mmHg represents the 97.5th percentile of normal and identifies a truly abnormal pulmonary pressure.
Multiple retrospective cohort studies in COPD, IPF, and scleroderma confirmed that mildly elevated mPAP of 21-24 mmHg was associated with significantly worse functional status and survival compared to normal mPAP. A systematic review of >16,000 patients showed mild PH (mPAP 19-24 mmHg) carried an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.7).
- Harrison's 22E, Chapter 294

1.3 Normal Pulmonary Circulation Values

ParameterNormal Value
mPAP14 ± 3.3 mmHg (upper limit ~20 mmHg)
Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure (PAWP/PCWP)8 ± 2.9 mmHg
Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)0.93 ± 0.38 Wood Units (WU)
Cardiac Output (CO)4-8 L/min
Cardiac Index (CI)2.5-4.0 L/min/m²
Normal upper limits: mPAP ≤20 mmHg, PAWP ≤15 mmHg, PVR <2.0 WU

1.4 Complete Hemodynamic Definitions (2022 ESC/ERS + 2018 WSPH)

Hemodynamic CategorymPAPPAWPPVRGroups
Normal≤20 mmHg≤15 mmHg<2 WU-
Pre-capillary PH>20 mmHg≤15 mmHg≥2 WU (ESC) / ≥3 WU (WSPH Murray&Nadel)1, 3, 4, 5
Isolated post-capillary PH>20 mmHg>15 mmHg<2 WU2, 5
Combined pre+post-capillary PH>20 mmHg>15 mmHg≥2 WU2, 5
Exercise PH (new 2022)mPAP/CO slope >3 mmHg/L/min during exercise---
EXAM PEARL: Previous definition ≥25 mmHg changed to >20 mmHg. This "gray zone" of mPAP 21-24 mmHg with PVR 2-3 WU is clinically relevant but has NO approved therapies as of 2022.
Harrison vs ESC Note: Harrison's 22E uses PVR >2.0 WU for precapillary PH. Some sources (Murray & Nadel, older WSPH) use ≥3 WU. The 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines adopted >2 WU to align with the lower mPAP threshold.

1.5 Key Changes from Previous Guidelines

FeaturePre-2018 Definition2022 ESC/ERS Definition
mPAP threshold≥25 mmHg>20 mmHg
PVR for precapillary PH>3 WU>2 WU
Exercise PHNot recognizedRe-introduced (mPAP/CO slope >3 mmHg/L/min)
DPG (diastolic pressure gradient)UsedDe-emphasized in favor of PVR

SECTION 2: EPIDEMIOLOGY

2.1 Global Prevalence and Incidence

  • PH is not rare - may be as common as multiple sclerosis and more than twice as common as IPF (Murray & Nadel)
  • Overall PH prevalence: 99.8 to 127.3 per 100,000 population (Canadian universal health care data, 2002-2012)
  • PAH specifically (Group 1): estimated prevalence 15-50 per million persons - the rarest form
  • Group 2 (Left heart disease) is the most common form of PH in community-based studies
  • ~20% of PH cases are PAH; majority are Group 2 (LHD) or Group 3 (lung disease)

2.2 Age and Sex Distribution

  • PH affects individuals of all ages and races
  • Women more commonly affected than men - especially in PAH
  • IPAH: female predominance with female:male ratio ~2-4:1
  • CTD-associated PAH: predominantly female (reflects CTD demographics)
  • CTEPH (Group 4): more equal sex distribution
  • Age at diagnosis of IPAH: median ~50 years (registry data); older patients more often have Group 2 PH
  • Trend: increasing age at diagnosis as HFpEF and sleep apnea-related PH become more prevalent

2.3 Major Etiologies

RegionMost Common Cause of PH
WorldwideGroup 2 (Left heart disease - most common overall)
Worldwide (PAH specifically)IPAH (~50% of PAH)
Worldwide (PAH)CTD-associated PAH (~25% of PAH)
Developing countriesSchistosomiasis (affects >230 million; ~5% develop PAH), rheumatic heart disease
IndiaMitral stenosis (Group 2), CTD-PAH, IPAH, CTEPH, congenital heart disease, schistosomiasis
India-specific: Mitral stenosis from rheumatic heart disease remains a common cause of Group 2 PH. Sickle cell disease-associated PH occurs in 6-10% of patients. Schistosomiasis is a globally significant cause.

2.4 Prognosis and Survival

  • Without treatment: median survival in IPAH historically ~2.8 years from diagnosis
  • With modern combination therapy: 1-year survival ~82%, 3-year ~67%, 5-year ~58% (Harrison's 22E)
  • CTD-PAH (especially SSc): prognosis worse than IPAH; SSc-PAH accounts for 30% of SSc deaths
  • CTEPH: best prognosis if amenable to pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), which can be curative

SECTION 3: ETIOLOGY - WHO CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION

3.1 WHO/WSPH Group Classification (6th WSPH 2018 / 2022 ESC-ERS)

GROUP 1 - PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION (PAH)
1.1 Idiopathic PAH (IPAH)
   1.1.1 Non-responders at vasoreactivity testing
   1.1.2 Acute responders at vasoreactivity testing (long-term CCB responders)
1.2 Heritable PAH
   - BMPR2 mutations (most common)
   - ALK1, ENG (endoglin), SMAD9, CAV1, KCNK3
   - EIF2AK4 (PVOD/PCH associated)
   - TBX4 (pediatric PAH)
1.3 Drug/toxin-induced PAH
   - Definite: aminorex, fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine, toxic rapeseed oil,
     dasatinib, benfluorex
   - Likely: amphetamines, interferon alpha/beta, alkylating agents
   - Possible: cocaine, phenylpropanolamine, SSRIs (neonatal PH)
1.4 Associated PAH (APAH)
   1.4.1 Connective tissue diseases (SSc, SLE, MCTD, RA, Sjogren's)
   1.4.2 HIV infection
   1.4.3 Portal hypertension / portopulmonary hypertension
   1.4.4 Congenital heart disease (ASD, VSD, PDA, AVSD - Eisenmenger)
   1.4.5 Schistosomiasis
1.5 PAH with long-term response to calcium channel blockers (NEW in 6th WSPH)
1.6 PAH with overt venous/capillary involvement (PVOD/PCH)
1.7 Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN)

GROUP 2 - PH DUE TO LEFT HEART DISEASE
2.1 Heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF) [most common cause of Group 2]
2.2 Heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF)
2.3 Valvular heart disease (mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis)
2.4 Congenital/acquired cardiovascular conditions causing post-capillary PH
   - Congenital pulmonary veins stenosis
   - Cor triatriatum

GROUP 3 - PH DUE TO LUNG DISEASES AND/OR HYPOXIA
3.1 Obstructive lung disease (COPD)
3.2 Restrictive lung disease (ILD, including UIP/IPF)
3.3 Mixed obstructive-restrictive pattern
3.4 Sleep-disordered breathing (OSA, OHS)
3.5 Alveolar hypoventilation disorders
3.6 Chronic exposure to high altitude
3.7 Developmental lung disorders

GROUP 4 - PH DUE TO PULMONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTIONS
4.1 Chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) [most common in Group 4]
4.2 Other pulmonary artery obstructions:
   - Angiosarcoma, other intravascular tumors
   - Arteritis without connective tissue disease
   - Congenital pulmonary artery stenosis
   - Parasites (hydatid cyst)

GROUP 5 - PH WITH UNCLEAR AND/OR MULTIFACTORIAL MECHANISMS
5.1 Hematological disorders:
   - Chronic hemolytic anemia (sickle cell disease, thalassemia, hereditary spherocytosis)
   - Myeloproliferative neoplasms
   - Splenectomy
5.2 Systemic disorders:
   - Sarcoidosis (granulomatous vasculitis + lymph node compression)
   - Pulmonary histiocytosis (Langerhans cell)
   - Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)
   - Neurofibromatosis type 1
5.3 Metabolic disorders:
   - Glycogen storage diseases
   - Gaucher disease
   - Thyroid disorders (hypo/hyperthyroidism)
5.4 Complex congenital heart disease (post-surgical, segmental PH)
5.5 Others:
   - Fibrosing mediastinitis
   - Tumour emboli
   - Chronic renal failure with dialysis

3.2 Genetic Mutations in Heritable PAH

GeneProteinPathwayFrequencyNotes
BMPR2BMP receptor type 2TGF-β/BMP~75% of familial PAH, ~25% sporadic IPAHAutosomal dominant; incomplete penetrance (15-20%)
ALK1 (ACVRL1)Activin receptor-like kinase 1TGF-β~1-2%HHT-associated; telangiectasias
ENGEndoglinTGF-βRareHHT-associated
SMAD9 (SMAD8)Signal transducerTGF-β/BMP downstreamRare-
CAV1Caveolin-1Lipid raft signalingRareLoss of function
KCNK3TASK-1 potassium channelK+ channelRareGain of function (reduced activity)
EIF2AK4eIF2α kinase 4Stress responsePVOD/PCH specificBiallelic loss-of-function; autosomal recessive
TBX4T-box transcription factor 4Lung developmentPediatric PAHSmall patella syndrome
EXAM PEARL: BMPR2 mutations show incomplete penetrance - only 15-20% of carriers develop clinical PAH. Female sex increases penetrance. EIF2AK4 is the signature mutation for PVOD (pulmonary veno-occlusive disease) and PCH (pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis).

SECTION 4: PULMONARY CIRCULATION PHYSIOLOGY

4.1 Anatomy

  • The pulmonary circulation receives the entire cardiac output from the right ventricle
  • Pulmonary arteries: thin-walled, highly compliant, low-pressure system
  • Pulmonary arteries branch in parallel with airways down to the level of terminal bronchioles
  • Pulmonary arterioles (diameter 70-500 µm) are the primary site of vascular resistance
  • Pulmonary capillary bed: enormous surface area (~70 m²); single-cell thickness for gas exchange
  • Pulmonary veins drain into left atrium; four main veins (two from each lung)

4.2 Pulmonary Vascular Resistance

PVR (Wood Units) = (mPAP - PAWP) / CO
Where:
  • mPAP = mean pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)
  • PAWP = pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mmHg) [reflects LVEDP]
  • CO = cardiac output (L/min)
Normal PVR: ~0.93 ± 0.38 WU (<2 WU)
To convert: 1 WU = 80 dynes·sec·cm⁻⁵
Factors increasing PVR:
  • Hypoxia (hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction - main defense against V/Q mismatch)
  • Thromboembolism
  • Vascular remodeling (smooth muscle hypertrophy, intimal proliferation)
  • Acidosis, hypercapnia
  • Inflammatory mediators
Factors decreasing PVR:
  • Oxygen, NO, prostacyclin
  • Sildenafil, bosentan
  • Lung recruitment (positive pressure breathing can paradoxically increase PVR at high volumes)

4.3 Right Ventricular - Pulmonary Artery Coupling

  • RV-PA coupling = ratio of RV contractility (Ees) to arterial elastance (Ea)
  • Normal Ees/Ea ratio ≥ 1.5-2.0 (RV is an efficient pump at normal afterload)
  • In PAH: progressive ↑ PVR → ↑ RV afterload → RV compensates by hypertrophy (adapted state)
  • When Ees/Ea falls <0.8, the RV is uncoupled from the PA - maladaptive remodeling
  • Uncoupling manifests as RV dilatation, decreased RV EF, systemic venous congestion
  • TAPSE/sPAP ratio (echocardiographic surrogate of RV-PA coupling): >0.32 mm/mmHg = favorable; <0.19 mm/mmHg = high risk (2022 ESC/ERS risk stratification)

4.4 Pulmonary Vascular Compliance

PVC = Stroke Volume / Pulse Pressure of PA
  • Reflects the capacitance (elastic recoil) of the pulmonary vasculature
  • Reduced PVC is an early marker of pulmonary vascular disease
  • Inversely related to PVR: as PVR rises, PVC falls
  • Low PVC increases RV pulsatile load (additional to resistive load)
  • PVC × PVR product is ~remarkably constant (~0.5 mL/mmHg × WU) across disease states

SECTION 5: PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

5.1 Overview - Three Core Molecular Pathways Targeted by Therapy

NORMAL ENDOTHELIUM
       |
   INJURY/TRIGGER
  (genetic, immune, hypoxic, toxic)
       |
ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION
       |
  Three Imbalanced Pathways:
  
  [1] ↓ NO production/↑ PDE5    [2] ↓ Prostacyclin/↑ TXA2    [3] ↑ Endothelin-1
         (vasoconstriction)          (vasoconstriction +            (vasoconstriction +
                                      thrombosis)                    proliferation)
                                              |
                             PULMONARY VASCULAR REMODELING
                             (SMC proliferation, intimal fibrosis,
                              adventitial thickening, neomuscularization)
                                              |
                           PROGRESSIVE ↑ PVR → ↑ mPAP
                                              |
                              RV PRESSURE OVERLOAD
                                    /         \
                          ADAPTIVE (early)   MALADAPTIVE (late)
                         (RV hypertrophy)   (RV dilatation, failure)

5.2 Nitric Oxide (NO) Pathway

  • Endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) produces NO from L-arginine
  • NO activates soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) → ↑ cGMP → smooth muscle relaxation + anti-proliferative
  • In PAH:
    • ↓ eNOS expression/activity
    • ↑ PDE5 activity (breaks down cGMP)
    • ↑ Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) - endogenous NOS inhibitor
    • Net result: ↓ cGMP → vasoconstriction + SMC proliferation
Therapeutic targets:
  • PDE-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil): ↑ cGMP by blocking its degradation
  • sGC stimulators (riociguat): directly stimulate sGC, even in low/absent NO states

5.3 Prostacyclin Pathway

  • Prostacyclin (PGI₂) produced by endothelial cells from arachidonic acid via cyclooxygenase
  • Activates adenylate cyclase → ↑ cAMP → smooth muscle relaxation + vasodilation
  • Also: anti-aggregatory (↓ platelet aggregation), anti-proliferative
  • Thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂) is the opposing vasoconstrictor + pro-aggregatory
  • In PAH:
    • ↓ prostacyclin synthase expression (↓ PGI₂)
    • ↑ TXA₂ production
    • Net: vasoconstriction + platelet activation + in situ thrombosis
Therapeutic targets:
  • Prostacyclin analogues: epoprostenol (IV), treprostinil (IV/SC/inhaled/oral), iloprost (inhaled), beraprost (oral, Asia)
  • IP receptor agonists: selexipag (oral, selective IP receptor)

5.4 Endothelin Pathway

  • Endothelin-1 (ET-1): most potent endogenous vasoconstrictor produced by endothelial cells
  • Acts via two receptors:
    • ET-A receptors (smooth muscle): mediate vasoconstriction + proliferation
    • ET-B receptors (endothelium): mediate vasodilation (via NO/PGI₂), clearance of ET-1
  • In PAH:
    • ↑ ET-1 production by dysfunctional endothelium
    • ↑ ET-A:ET-B ratio on smooth muscle
    • Net: vasoconstriction + SMC proliferation + fibrosis
Therapeutic targets:
  • Dual ERA (ET-A + ET-B blockade): bosentan, macitentan
  • Selective ET-A antagonist: ambrisentan (theoretically preserves ET-B mediated vasodilation)

5.5 Vascular Remodeling

Histopathological changes in PAH (precapillary arterioles <500 µm):
  1. Intimal proliferation: myofibroblast/smooth muscle-like cell migration + fibrous intimal hyperplasia → narrowed lumen
  2. Medial hypertrophy: smooth muscle cell (SMC) hypertrophy + hyperplasia → increased media thickness
  3. Adventitial thickening: fibroblast proliferation + excess collagen deposition
  4. Neomuscularization of normally non-muscular arterioles
  5. Plexiform lesions (pathognomonic of PAH and CTEPH): disordered, angioproliferative lesions forming distal to obstructed arterioles

5.6 Plexiform Lesions

  • Pathognomonic of advanced PAH (Group 1) and CTEPH
  • Located at bifurcations of pulmonary arterioles
  • Composed of: channels lined by disorganized endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, myofibroblasts, and inflammatory cells
  • Mechanism: endothelial cells become monoclonal and apoptosis-resistant ("pseudo-neoplastic" phenotype)
  • BMPR2 dysfunction leads to unchecked cell proliferation
  • Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition (End-MT) contributes to fibrotic and plexigenic remodeling
Harrison's 22E: "Plexigenic and fibrotic remodeling of pulmonary arterioles impairs pulmonary arterial compliance and results in a progressive increase in total PVR."

5.7 In Situ Thrombosis

  • Due to: ↓ prostacyclin, ↓ thrombomodulin, ↓ fibrinolysis, activated platelets, and vascular stasis
  • Microthrombi in small pulmonary arterioles (distinct from macrovascular thromboemboli in CTEPH)
  • Contributes to progressive vascular occlusion
  • Historically justified anticoagulation in IPAH (now debated - see treatment section)

5.8 Inflammation

  • Inflammatory cells (T cells, B cells, macrophages, mast cells) infiltrate pulmonary vascular adventitia
  • Elevated IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, CXCL12 in PAH
  • Regulatory T-cell dysfunction: loss of immune tolerance allowing autoimmune vascular injury
  • Relevant in CTD-PAH, HIV-PAH
  • JAK2 overactivation in PAH - ruxolitinib (JAK2 inhibitor) is an emerging therapeutic

5.9 Right Ventricular Adaptation and Failure

Stage 1 - Adaptive (Compensated):
  • Concentric RV hypertrophy (↑ wall thickness, preserved cavity size)
  • ↑ RV systolic pressure matches ↑ pulmonary load
  • Normal/near-normal CO
  • RV-PA coupling maintained (Ees/Ea ≥ 1.5)
  • Metabolic shift: fatty acid oxidation to glycolysis (Warburg-like)
Stage 2 - Maladaptive (Decompensated):
  • RV dilatation (cavity enlargement, wall thinning - "volume overload pattern")
  • ↑ RV wall stress → subendocardial ischemia (RV O₂ supply-demand mismatch)
  • Septal flattening → D-shaped LV → ↓ LV preload → ↓ CO
  • Tricuspid regurgitation (functional, due to annular dilatation)
  • Elevated RAP → systemic venous hypertension, hepatic congestion, ascites, edema
  • RV-PA uncoupling: TAPSE/sPAP < 0.19 mm/mmHg
RV Failure Cascade:
↑ PVR → ↑ RV Afterload
           ↓
    RV Pressure Overload
           ↓
   RV Hypertrophy (adaptive)
           ↓
   RV Dilatation (maladaptive)
           ↓
Septal shift left → ↓ LV filling
           ↓
     ↓ Cardiac Output
           ↓
 Systemic hypoperfusion + venous congestion
           ↓
Multi-organ dysfunction (liver, kidneys)
           ↓
          DEATH

SECTION 6: HEMODYNAMIC CLASSIFICATION

6.1 Complete Hemodynamic Classification Table

CategorymPAPPAWPPVRDPGClinical Examples
Pre-capillary PH>20 mmHg≤15 mmHg>2 WU-IPAH, CTD-PAH, CTEPH, Group 3 PH
Isolated post-capillary PH (IpcPH)>20 mmHg>15 mmHg≤2 WU<7 mmHgHFpEF, mitral stenosis, HFrEF
Combined pre+post-capillary PH (CpcPH)>20 mmHg>15 mmHg>2 WU≥7 mmHgAdvanced LHD with reactive PH, severe MR/MS with vascular remodeling
Diastolic Pressure Gradient (DPG) = Diastolic PA pressure - mean PAWP (normal <5 mmHg)
  • DPG ≥7 mmHg suggests pre-capillary component in a post-capillary background
  • Less affected by volume status compared to TPG (transpulmonary gradient)
Transpulmonary Gradient (TPG) = mPAP - mean PAWP (normal <12 mmHg)
  • TPG >12 mmHg = raised; but affected by high flow states
EXAM PEARL: In a patient with heart failure, diuresis before RHC may artificially lower PAWP, making isolated post-capillary PH appear as pre-capillary PH ("Group 2 masquerading as Group 1"). Always assess clinical context and volume status.

SECTION 7: WHO CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION - DETAILED

7.1 Group 1 - Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Characteristic hemodynamics:
  • mPAP >20 mmHg, PAWP ≤15 mmHg, PVR >2 WU (pre-capillary)
  • Normal or reduced CO (in advanced disease)
Characteristic pathology:
  • Medial hypertrophy, intimal proliferation, adventitial fibrosis
  • Plexiform lesions (most advanced)
  • Thrombotic lesions in small arterioles
Key investigations:
  • RHC: pre-capillary hemodynamics
  • Echo: elevated RVSP, RV enlargement, D-shaped septum
  • PFTs: mild restrictive pattern, low DLCO (especially PVOD/PCH)
  • HRCT: normal parenchyma in IPAH; ground glass + septal lines in PVOD/PCH
  • ANA, anti-Scl-70, anti-dsDNA (CTD screen)
  • HIV, LFTs (portal hypertension screen)

7.2 Group 2 - PH Due to Left Heart Disease

Most common form of PH overall
Characteristic hemodynamics:
  • mPAP >20 mmHg, PAWP >15 mmHg (post-capillary)
  • ↑ LVEDP
Pathology:
  • Venous congestion, medial hypertrophy of small pulmonary veins
  • In CpcPH: additional arteriolar remodeling
Key investigations:
  • Echo: LV systolic/diastolic dysfunction, valvular disease, LA enlargement
  • Coronary angiography (if ischemic cardiomyopathy suspected)
  • RHC: confirms elevated PAWP; rules out PAH

7.3 Group 3 - PH Due to Lung Disease/Hypoxia

Mechanism: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction + structural vascular changes (vascular bed destruction in emphysema, perivascular fibrosis in ILD)
Characteristic hemodynamics:
  • Usually mild PH (mPAP 25-35 mmHg); if mPAP >35 mmHg in COPD/ILD, suspect concomitant PAH or CTEPH
Key investigations:
  • PFTs: obstructive (COPD) or restrictive (ILD) pattern
  • HRCT: emphysema, bronchiectasis, interstitial fibrosis
  • ABG: hypoxemia, hypercapnia
  • V/Q scan: patchy matched defects (vs. segmental mismatch in CTEPH)

7.4 Group 4 - CTEPH

Mechanism: Incomplete resolution of PE → organized thrombus → mechanical obstruction + vascular remodeling
Characteristic hemodynamics:
  • Pre-capillary PH
  • Significant increase in PVR (often severe: >5-10 WU)
  • May have severely impaired CO
Pathology:
  • Organized intraluminal thrombus (not fresh clot - chronic, fibrotic)
  • Intimal webs, pouches, bands in pulmonary arteries
  • Microvascular disease in patent vessels (small vessel remodeling - secondary PH component)
Key investigations:
  • V/Q scan: BEST screening test - segmental perfusion defects without matched ventilation defects
  • CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA): webs, pouches, mural thrombus, mosaic perfusion
  • Digital subtraction angiography (DSA): gold standard for surgical planning
  • RHC: pre-capillary hemodynamics with high PVR

7.5 Group 5 - Miscellaneous/Multifactorial

  • Sarcoidosis: multiple mechanisms (granulomatous vasculitis, lymphadenopathy compression, hypoxia, LV dysfunction)
  • Sickle cell disease: hemolysis (↓ NO via free Hb scavenging), thromboembolism, hypoxia; 6-10% prevalence in SCD
  • Myeloproliferative disorders: ↑ viscosity, ↑ thrombotic risk
  • Thyroid disease: both hypo and hyperthyroidism can cause PH

SECTION 8: CLINICAL FEATURES

8.1 Symptoms (in order of progression)

StageCommon Symptoms
Early (WHO FC I-II)Exertional dyspnea (most common, earliest symptom), fatigue, reduced exercise tolerance
Intermediate (WHO FC II-III)Dyspnea at lesser exertion, chest pain (angina-type from RV ischemia), pre-syncope on exertion
Advanced (WHO FC III-IV)Syncope (RV unable to augment CO with exertion), orthopnea, PND, abdominal distension (ascites), leg edema, hemoptysis
Symptoms of specific groups:
  • Raynaud's phenomenon, skin thickening, sicca symptoms → CTD-PAH
  • Chronic cough, sputum → COPD/ILD-related PH (Group 3)
  • History of DVT/PE → CTEPH (Group 4)
  • Cirrhosis → portopulmonary PH

8.2 Physical Examination

Cardiovascular signs:
  • Loud P2 (pulmonic component of S2): most consistent sign of PH; heard best at left upper sternal border
  • Right ventricular heave (left parasternal heave): sustained, palpable
  • Murmur of tricuspid regurgitation: holosystolic at LLSB; ↑ with inspiration (Carvallo's sign)
  • Pulmonic regurgitation murmur (Graham Steell murmur): early diastolic at LUSB
  • Right-sided S3/S4: gallop rhythm
Signs of RV failure:
  • Elevated JVP with prominent a and v waves
  • Hepatomegaly (pulsatile if TR present)
  • Ascites (in advanced disease)
  • Peripheral edema (dependent, bilateral)
  • Cyanosis: due to ↓ CO, right-to-left shunting through PFO
  • Clubbing: suggests congenital heart disease (Eisenmenger) or pulmonary venocclusive disease
Signs pointing to specific etiology:
  • Telangiectasias, sclerodactyly → SSc-PAH
  • Oral ulcers, malar rash → SLE-PAH
  • Spider angiomas, splenomegaly → portopulmonary PH
  • Kyphoscoliosis → Group 3 PH

8.3 WHO Functional Classification

ClassDefinitionClinical Analog
FC INo limitation; ordinary activity does not cause symptomsAsymptomatic despite PH
FC IISlight limitation; comfortable at rest; ordinary activity causes dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain, or near-syncopeNYHA Class II
FC IIIMarked limitation; comfortable at rest; less than ordinary activity causes symptomsNYHA Class III
FC IVInability to carry out any activity; symptoms at rest; signs of right heart failureNYHA Class IV
EXAM PEARL: WHO FC is a key prognostic variable AND determines initial therapy intensity. FC III-IV at presentation → initiate triple combination therapy including parenterals (per 2022 ESC/ERS).

8.4 Red Flag Features (Rapid Referral Triggers per 2022 ESC/ERS)

  • Rapid progression of symptoms
  • Severely reduced exercise capacity (6MWD <165 m)
  • Pre-syncope or syncope on mild exertion
  • Signs of right heart failure (edema, ascites)
  • mPAP >50 mmHg on echo estimate
  • CT evidence of RV dilation + septal bowing

SECTION 9: DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH

9.1 Stepwise Diagnostic Algorithm (2022 ESC/ERS Three-Step Approach)

STEP 1: SUSPICION (Primary Care / General Physician)
Clinical evaluation:
- Unexplained exertional dyspnea
- Known associated condition (CTD, CHD, portal HTN, HIV, PE history)
- Risk factors for PAH or CTEPH

Initial tests:
- ECG, O₂ saturation (pulse oximetry)
- CXR
- Basic blood work (CBC, LFTs, TFTs, ANA)

↓

STEP 2: DETECTION (Echocardiography + Further Testing)
Echocardiogram - KEY SCREENING TOOL:
- TRV > 2.8 m/s → LOW probability PH
- TRV 2.9-3.4 m/s + other signs → INTERMEDIATE probability
- TRV > 3.4 m/s OR TRV 2.9-3.4 + other signs → HIGH probability

Supporting tests:
- PFTs + DLCO
- ABG
- HRCT chest
- V/Q scan
- Sleep study if suspected OSA

↓

STEP 3: CONFIRMATION (PH Center - Specialist)
Right Heart Catheterization (RHC) - GOLD STANDARD
- Confirms hemodynamic diagnosis
- Rules in/out precapillary vs postcapillary PH
- Vasoreactivity testing if indicated

Additional:
- CTPA (CTEPH)
- Pulmonary angiography (surgical planning)
- Cardiac MRI
- Genetic testing (BMPR2 etc.)
- Connective tissue disease work-up
- HIV, hepatitis serology
- BNP/NT-proBNP (baseline + monitoring)

9.2 ECG Findings

FeatureSignificance
Right axis deviation (>+100°)Suggests RVH
Right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH)R:S > 1 in V1; S > R in I, aVL, V5-V6
Right bundle branch block (RBBB)RV conduction delay
P pulmonale (P >2.5 mm in II)RAH (right atrial hypertrophy)
ST-T changes V1-V4RV strain pattern
Sinus tachycardiaLow CO state, sympathetic activation
ECG has poor sensitivity for early PH but suggests severity in established disease. Normal ECG does not exclude PH.

9.3 Chest X-Ray Findings

FeatureSignificance
Enlarged main pulmonary artery (>2.9 cm)PH (sensitivity ~40%)
Peripheral pruning (oligemia)Reduced flow in peripheral vessels
Right heart enlargement (RA, RV)Cardiomegaly from RV/RA dilation
Clear lung fieldsIPAH (vs Group 3 with parenchymal disease)
Interstitial opacities + Kerley B linesGroup 2 PH (pulmonary venous HTN)
Unilateral oligemia (Westermark sign)CTEPH (massive unilateral disease)

9.4 Echocardiography

Most important non-invasive screening tool
Probability of PH based on peak TRV (tricuspid regurgitation velocity):
TRVAdditional Echo SignsPH Probability
≤2.8 m/sAbsentLow
≤2.8 m/sPresentIntermediate
2.9-3.4 m/sAbsentIntermediate
2.9-3.4 m/sPresentHigh
>3.4 m/sAnyHigh
Additional echocardiographic signs (2022 ESC/ERS - A, B, C categories):
  • A (right ventricle): RVOT AcT <105 ms, mid-systolic notching
  • B (pulmonary artery): Estimated PA systolic pressure >35 mmHg, PAWP >15 mmHg (IVRT-based)
  • C (right heart): RA area >18 cm², RA/LA ratio >1, RV/LV ratio >1.0, IVC dilation >21 mm (no inspiratory collapse)
  • Pericardial effusion (reflects severe PH + right heart failure)
RV function markers:
  • TAPSE (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion): <18 mm = RV dysfunction
  • S' wave (TDI at TV annulus): <9.5 cm/s = RV dysfunction
  • FAC (fractional area change): <35% = RV systolic dysfunction
  • TAPSE/sPAP ratio <0.19 mm/mmHg = high risk (RV-PA uncoupling)

9.5 Pulmonary Function Tests

  • Spirometry: usually normal in IPAH; obstructive in COPD, restrictive in ILD
  • DLCO (diffusing capacity): most important PFT in PAH
    • Mild reduction (60-80% predicted) common in IPAH
    • Severely reduced DLCO (<40-50%) → suspect CTD-PAH, PVOD/PCH, or ILD
    • Low DLCO in SSc even without ILD → suggests PAH
  • Lung volumes: mild restrictive pattern can occur in PAH without parenchymal disease
  • Serial PFTs (every 3-6 months) indicated in high-risk SSc patients for ILD monitoring

9.6 HRCT Chest

HRCT FindingSignificance
Enlarged main PA (>29 mm; or PA:aorta ratio >1)PH
Mosaic attenuation (patchy ground glass)CTEPH (air-trapping from reduced flow)
Ground glass opacity + interlobular septal thickeningPVOD/PCH (Group 1.6)
Peripheral + subpleural bronchiectasis, honeycombingUIP/IPF → Group 3
Mediastinal lymphadenopathy + granulomasSarcoidosis → Group 5
PVOD/PCH on HRCT: bilateral ground glass + septal lines + mediastinal lymphadenopathy + pleural effusions. These patients develop severe pulmonary edema with vasodilators - must not be given prostanoids/ERAs aggressively.

9.7 CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)

For CTEPH diagnosis:
  • Webs, bands, pouches, complete occlusions
  • Mosaic perfusion pattern
  • Bronchial artery collaterals
  • Sensitivity ~70%, specificity ~90% for CTEPH
  • Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) = gold standard for surgical planning

9.8 V/Q Scan

ConditionV/Q Pattern
CTEPHSegmental perfusion defects (unmatched) - highly sensitive (~97%) for CTEPH
PAH (Group 1)Normal or patchy non-segmental perfusion defects
COPDMatched V/Q abnormalities
Acute PEClassic "reverse bat-wing"; may be indistinguishable from CTEPH acutely
KEY: V/Q scan is PREFERRED over CTPA for CTEPH screening (higher sensitivity for segmental perfusion defects). 2022 ESC/ERS: V/Q scan should be done in ALL patients with unexplained PH to exclude CTEPH.

9.9 Cardiac MRI

  • Gold standard for RV volumes and function
  • Can detect pericardial effusion, myocardial fibrosis (LGE)
  • Not widely available; used in specialist centers
  • MRI-derived RVEF, RVESVI, SVI are key prognostic markers (2022 ESC/ERS risk stratification):
    • RVEF >54% → low risk
    • RVEF 37-54% → intermediate risk
    • RVEF <37% → high risk

9.10 Right Heart Catheterization (RHC)

GOLD STANDARD for diagnosis of PH
Measurements obtained:
  • Right atrial pressure (RAP)
  • Right ventricular pressure (RVP - systolic and diastolic)
  • Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP - systolic, diastolic, mean)
  • Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) - reflects LVEDP
  • Cardiac output (CO) by thermodilution or Fick method
  • Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR = [mPAP-PAWP]/CO)
  • Mixed venous O₂ saturation (SvO₂)
  • Cardiac index (CI)
  • Stroke volume index (SVI)
RHC Interpretation:
ParameterNormalPrecapillary PHPostcapillary PHCpcPH
mPAP≤20>20>20>20
PAWP≤15≤15>15>15
PVR (WU)<2>2≤2>2
RAP<8↑ in advanced↑ in advanced
CONormal↓ in advanced↓ in advanced
SvO₂>65%↓ in advanced↓ in advanced

9.11 Vasoreactivity Testing

Indications: Only in IPAH and heritable PAH (not CTD-PAH, CTEPH, or other associated PAH)
Agents:
  • Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) 10-20 ppm - preferred
  • Inhaled epoprostenol (iloprost)
  • IV adenosine (5% NaOH NOT used anymore)
  • NOT oral/IV CCBs for testing - too unpredictable
Positive vasoreactivity test (Sitbon criteria):
  • ↓ mPAP by ≥10 mmHg
  • Absolute mPAP ≤40 mmHg
  • Without decrease in cardiac output
Clinical significance:
  • Only <5% of IPAH patients are vasoreactive
  • Vasoreactive patients → long-term CCBs (nifedipine, diltiazem, amlodipine) → excellent prognosis
  • Diltiazem preferred if heart rate is high; nifedipine or amlodipine if heart rate normal/low
  • If CCBs fail after 3-6 months → re-evaluate, consider PAH-specific therapy

SECTION 10: BIOMARKERS AND BLOOD INVESTIGATIONS

10.1 Key Blood Tests

InvestigationRationale
CBCPolycythemia (Group 3/altitude), anemia (sickle cell, iron deficiency), thrombocytopenia
LFTs + coagulationPortal hypertension screen (portopulmonary PH)
TFTsThyroid disease (Group 5)
ANA, anti-dsDNASLE
Anti-Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I)SSc
Anti-centromere antibodyLimited SSc (CREST) - high PAH risk
Anti-U1-RNPMCTD
Anti-CCP, RFRA-PAH
HIV serologyHIV-PAH
Hepatitis B/C serologyCirrhosis-portopulmonary PH
Echo bubble contrastPFO detection (right-to-left shunting)
D-dimerScreening for CTEPH if PE history
Antiphospholipid antibodiesCTEPH risk factor

10.2 Biomarkers

BiomarkerSignificanceThresholds (2022 ESC/ERS Risk)
BNPRV wall stress marker; correlates with RVSP, prognosisLow: <50 pg/mL; Intermediate: 50-200 pg/mL; High: >200 pg/mL
NT-proBNPMore stable than BNP; longer half-lifeLow: <300 ng/L; Intermediate: 300-1400 ng/L; High: >1400 ng/L
Uric acidImpaired purine metabolism in low-flow states; prognostic markerElevated = worse prognosis
Troponin I/TRV myocardial injuryElevation = poor prognosis
GDF-15Growth differentiation factor; cardiac stressEmerging biomarker

SECTION 11: RISK STRATIFICATION

11.1 ESC/ERS 2022 Risk Model

The 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines use a 3-strata risk model (Low / Intermediate / High) with multiple variables:
VariableLow RiskIntermediate RiskHigh Risk
ClinicalNo syncope-Syncope
WHO FCI-IIIIIIV
6MWD>440 m165-440 m<165 m
BNP<50 pg/mL50-200 pg/mL>200 pg/mL
NT-proBNP<300 ng/L300-1400 ng/L>1400 ng/L
Echo: RA area<18 cm²18-26 cm²>26 cm²
Echo: Pericardial effusionAbsentMinimalModerate-large
Echo: TAPSE/sPAP>0.32 mm/mmHg0.19-0.32<0.19
cMRI: RVEF>54%37-54%<37%
cMRI: SVI>40 mL/m²26-40 mL/m²<26 mL/m²
Hemodynamics: RAP<8 mmHg8-14 mmHg>14 mmHg
Hemodynamics: CI≥2.5 L/min/m²2.0-2.4 L/min/m²<2.0 L/min/m²
Hemodynamics: SVI>38 mL/m²31-38 mL/m²<31 mL/m²
Hemodynamics: SvO₂>65%60-65%<60%
Risk category assignment:
  • Low risk: majority of variables in low-risk column
  • Intermediate-low (IL): 3 low + 1 high = IL, or ≥3 low + others intermediate
  • Intermediate-high (IH): 2+ high-risk variables, majority intermediate/high
  • High risk: majority high-risk, especially CI <2.0, RAP >14, FC IV
2022 ESC/ERS Update: Introduced Intermediate-Low (IL) and Intermediate-High (IH) sub-categories for better treatment stratification at follow-up.

11.2 REVEAL Registry Score (U.S.-Based Validation Tool)

ParameterPoints
PAH subtype (APAH-CTD)+1
Renal insufficiency+1
Male age >60 years+2
Pericardial effusion on echo+1
DLCO <32% predicted+1
6MWD <165 m+1
BNP >180 pg/mL+1
HR >92/min at rest+1
Systolic BP <110 mmHg+1
Antihypertensive med use+1
Scoring interpretation:
  • ≤6: Low risk (estimated 1-year survival >95%)
  • 7: Average risk (~91%)
  • 8: Moderately high (~77%)
  • ≥9: High risk (<65%)

SECTION 12: TREATMENT - GENERAL MEASURES AND SUPPORTIVE THERAPY

12.1 General Measures

Activity:
  • Exercise rehabilitation is recommended (supervised exercise training in stable patients)
  • Avoid strenuous exercise to exhaustion (risk of syncope/sudden death)
  • Cardiac rehabilitation - Class I recommendation in 2022 ESC/ERS
Altitude/Air travel:
  • Avoid high-altitude areas (>1500-2000 m) without supplemental O₂
  • In-flight supplemental O₂ during air travel if resting SpO₂ <92% or during exertion
Infection prevention:
  • Pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations recommended
  • COVID-19 vaccination (no data suggesting increased PH risk from vaccines)

12.2 Oxygen

  • Indication: Maintain SpO₂ >92% at rest (>95% optimal)
  • Group 3 (COPD, ILD): long-term O₂ therapy (LTOT) per standard criteria (PaO₂ <55 mmHg)
  • Group 1 PAH: O₂ indicated for hypoxemia to prevent secondary vasoconstriction
  • Nocturnal O₂: especially important in sleep-disordered breathing-related PH

12.3 Diuretics

  • Indication: Volume overload, RV failure (peripheral edema, ascites, hepatic congestion)
  • Agents: Loop diuretics (furosemide, torasemide); aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone)
  • Avoid over-diuresis - reduces RV preload → ↓ CO (RV is preload-dependent)
  • Monitor electrolytes (hypokalemia, hyponatremia)

12.4 Digoxin

  • Limited role in PAH
  • May be used for rate control in atrial fibrillation/flutter (common arrhythmias in advanced PH)
  • Historical use: modest improvement in RV contractility and CO (short-term data only)
  • No survival benefit demonstrated

12.5 Anticoagulation

This is a controversial area with evolving recommendations:
SituationRecommendation
CTEPH (Group 4)Lifelong anticoagulation - Class I; all patients even post-PEA
IPAH/Heritable PAHPreviously Class IIa (warfarin); now NOT routinely recommended in 2022 ESC/ERS due to lack of survival benefit and bleeding risk
APAH-CTD (SSc)Generally avoided (bleeding risk, no benefit)
Antiphospholipid antibody syndromeWarfarin or DOAC guided by thrombophilia management
2022 ESC/ERS Update: Anticoagulation in IPAH downgraded - now "may be considered" (Class IIb) rather than recommended. DOACs not validated in PAH.

12.6 Iron Supplementation

  • Iron deficiency (with or without anemia) is common in PAH (seen in ~40%)
  • Iron deficiency independently worsens exercise capacity and prognosis
  • IV iron supplementation improves 6MWD and quality of life in iron-deficient PAH patients
  • Oral iron often poorly absorbed - IV preferred

12.7 Pregnancy

  • Pregnancy is CONTRAINDICATED in PAH - maternal mortality ~30-50% historically
  • Risk from: 30-50% increase in CO during pregnancy, systemic vasodilation, delivery-related hemodynamic shifts, postpartum RV failure
  • 2022 ESC/ERS: Pregnancy is strongly discouraged (Class III - Harm)
  • Effective contraception essential: progesterone-only pill, IUD, or sterilization
  • Avoid: estrogen-containing OCP (↑ VTE risk, pulmonary vasoconstriction)
  • If pregnancy occurs: multidisciplinary care at expert center; IV epoprostenol + mode of delivery discussion

SECTION 13: PAH-SPECIFIC PHARMACOTHERAPY

13.1 Overview of Approved Drug Classes

THREE THERAPEUTIC PATHWAYS:

1. ENDOTHELIN PATHWAY          2. NO-cGMP PATHWAY           3. PROSTACYCLIN PATHWAY
   (↓ vasoconstriction,            (↑ vasodilation)              (↑ vasodilation,
    ↓ proliferation)                                              ↓ platelet aggregation)
         ↓                                ↓                              ↓
ENDOTHELIN RECEPTOR         PDE-5 INHIBITORS         PROSTACYCLIN ANALOGUES
ANTAGONISTS (ERAs):         + sGC STIMULATORS        + IP RECEPTOR AGONISTS
Bosentan, Ambrisentan,                                
Macitentan               Sildenafil, Tadalafil       Epoprostenol (IV)
                         + Riociguat                 Treprostinil (IV/SC/inh/oral)
                                                     Iloprost (inhaled)
                                                     Beraprost (oral, Asia)
                                                     Selexipag (oral IP agonist)

13.2 Endothelin Receptor Antagonists (ERAs)

DrugReceptor SelectivityDoseKey Features
BosentanDual (ET-A + ET-B)62.5 mg → 125 mg BDFirst approved ERA; LFT monitoring required monthly; teratogenic
AmbrisentanSelective ET-A5 mg OD → 10 mg ODLess hepatotoxic; peripheral edema common
MacitentanDual (ET-A + ET-B, tissue-penetrant)10 mg ODSERAPHIN trial - reduced morbidity/mortality; ↓ hemoglobin (monitor)
Class effects and side effects:
  • Peripheral edema (ET-B blockade → fluid retention)
  • Hepatotoxicity (monitor LFTs monthly - especially bosentan)
  • Teratogenicity (Category X - mandatory contraception)
  • Drug interactions: CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors (especially bosentan - induces CYP3A4 reducing cyclosporine, warfarin, statin levels)
  • Anemia (macitentan - dose-dependent)

13.3 PDE-5 Inhibitors

DrugDoseHalf-LifeNotes
Sildenafil20 mg TDS (PO)~4 hoursSUPER-1 trial - improved 6MWD +45 m; approved for PAH
Tadalafil40 mg OD~17.5 hoursOnce-daily dosing advantage; PHIRST trial
VardenafilOff-label use in PAH--
Mechanism: Block PDE-5 → ↑ cGMP → smooth muscle relaxation + anti-proliferative
Side effects: Headache, flushing, epistaxis, visual changes, priapism (rare), hypotension (especially with nitrates - ABSOLUTE CONTRAINDICATION to combine with nitrates)
CRITICAL: PDE-5 inhibitors + riociguat = CONTRAINDICATED (synergistic hypotension)

13.4 Soluble Guanylate Cyclase (sGC) Stimulator

DrugDoseUnique Feature
Riociguat0.5-2.5 mg TDS (titrate)Works in NO-INDEPENDENT manner; CHEST-1 trial (CTEPH), PATENT-1 trial (PAH)
Indications:
  1. PAH (Group 1) - PATENT-1: ↑ 6MWD +30 m
  2. CTEPH (inoperable or persistent post-PEA) - CHEST-1: ↑ 6MWD +46 m
  3. NOT approved for Group 2 (left heart disease) - DILATE-1/LEPHT showed harm (↓ BP, no benefit)
Contraindications: Concomitant PDE-5 inhibitors, pregnancy (teratogenic), severe hepatic impairment, hypotension

13.5 Prostacyclin Analogues

DrugRouteHalf-LifeNotes
Epoprostenol (prostacyclin, PGI₂)IV continuous infusion3-5 minutesFirst approved prostanoid; life-saving in severe PAH; pump device required; ↑ dose over time (tachyphylaxis); ONLY drug proven to improve survival in a RCT
TreprostinilIV, SC, inhaled, oral~4 hoursSC causes injection site pain; oral: modest benefit; inhaled 4-9 puffs 4x/day
IloprostInhaled~20-30 min inhalation effect6-9 inhalations/day; impractical
BeraprostOral35-40 minOnly oral; used mainly in Asia; modest efficacy
EXAM PEARL: Epoprostenol (IV continuous) is the ONLY PAH drug with proven mortality benefit in an RCT (Barst RJ, 1996 NEJM). It remains the treatment of choice for WHO FC IV patients and acutely decompensated PAH.
Common side effects of prostanoids:
  • Jaw pain (on eating), flushing, headache, nausea, diarrhea, skin flushing
  • Leg pain (treprostinil SC)
  • Risk of line sepsis and pump failure with IV routes (potentially fatal)

13.6 IP Receptor Agonist (Prostacyclin Receptor Agonist)

DrugMechanismDoseTrial
SelexipagSelective IP receptor agonist (non-prostanoid)200-1600 µg BD (oral; titrate)GRIPHON trial: ↓ combined morbidity/mortality endpoint by 40%
Advantages over prostanoids:
  • Oral administration
  • Selective IP receptor (avoids EP3-mediated side effects)
  • Longer half-life than prostanoids

13.7 Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs)

ONLY for vasoreactive patients (positive vasoreactivity test)
DrugDosePreference
Nifedipine30-240 mg/day (extended release)If heart rate ≤100/min
Diltiazem240-720 mg/dayIf heart rate >100/min (diltiazem slows HR)
Amlodipine2.5-20 mg/dayGood tolerability
AVOID verapamil - negative inotropic effect on already compromised RV
Warning: CCBs must NEVER be given to non-vasoreactive PAH patients (risk of hemodynamic collapse from acute RV failure)

13.8 Treatment Algorithm (2022 ESC/ERS - Initial Therapy)

NEWLY DIAGNOSED PAH
         |
    VASOREACTIVITY TEST?
    (IPAH/Heritable only)
         |                              |
    POSITIVE (<5%)                 NEGATIVE (>95%)
         |                              |
  Long-term CCB              Assess WHO FC + Comorbidities
         |                              |
  Re-assess at 3-6 months      LOW/INT RISK          HIGH RISK
  If inadequate → switch        (FC I-III)            (FC IV)
         |
  INITIAL COMBINATION THERAPY           TRIPLE COMBINATION
  (Oral dual combination):              including IV Prostanoid:
  ERA + PDE5i                           ERA + PDE5i + Epoprostenol IV
  (e.g., Macitentan + Tadalafil)        (or Treprostinil IV/SC)
         |
  FOLLOW-UP REASSESSMENT AT 3-6 MONTHS
  Risk stratification (3-strata model)
         |
  ACHIEVED LOW RISK?     NOT ACHIEVED LOW RISK?
         |                         |
    Continue                SEQUENTIAL COMBINATION
                            Add third drug
                            (e.g., add Selexipag to ERA+PDE5i)
                                   |
                            STILL NOT AT LOW RISK?
                                   |
                           LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
                           (refer early; bridge with IV prostanoid)
2022 ESC/ERS Key Change: Initial ORAL COMBINATION THERAPY (Era + PDE5i or sGC) is now preferred over monotherapy for most treatment-naive patients. This is a significant upgrade from previous "sequential add-on" approach.

SECTION 14: MANAGEMENT BY WHO GROUP

14.1 Group 1 PAH - Treatment Priorities

  1. Establish diagnosis via RHC at PH center
  2. Vasoreactivity testing (IPAH/heritable only)
  3. Risk stratification (low/intermediate/high)
  4. Initial combination oral therapy (ERA + PDE5i) for most patients
  5. High-risk/FC IV: IV epoprostenol as first-line or add-on
  6. Reassess at 3-6 months; escalate if not at low risk
  7. Lung transplantation listing for non-responders (bilateral lung or heart-lung)
SSc-PAH specifics:
  • Screen annually with echo in all SSc patients
  • Anti-centromere antibody positivity → higher PAH risk
  • Respond less well to therapy than IPAH
  • SSc-PAH accounts for 30% of SSc deaths (Harrison's 22E)
Portopulmonary PH:
  • PVR must be <5 WU and mPAP <50 mmHg before liver transplantation (transplantation contraindicated with severe PH)
  • Treat with ERA, PDE5i; IV prostanoids as bridge to transplantation
  • Avoid β-blockers (used for portal hypertension) - worsen RV function
Congenital Heart Disease - Eisenmenger syndrome:
  • PAH-specific therapy (bosentan - BREATHE-5 trial: improved 6MWD and hemodynamics)
  • Lung transplantation + cardiac repair OR heart-lung transplantation
  • Avoid pulmonary vasodilators that reduce systemic resistance without reducing PVR (risk of worsening right-to-left shunt)

14.2 Group 2 PH (Left Heart Disease) - Treatment Priorities

  1. Optimize treatment of underlying LHD (diuretics, ACEi/ARB, β-blockers, valve surgery)
  2. NO PAH-specific therapy for isolated post-capillary PH
  3. CpcPH with high PVR: PAH drugs may be considered in specialized centers only (riociguat contraindicated per LEPHT)
  4. Mitral valve repair/replacement for mitral stenosis → may resolve PH
  5. Left heart assist devices (LVAD) for end-stage HFrEF may lower PAP
CRITICAL EXAM POINT: PAH-specific drugs are NOT indicated for Group 2 PH. Sildenafil and riociguat showed harm (increased hospitalizations, no benefit) in HFpEF-related PH trials.

14.3 Group 3 PH (Lung Disease/Hypoxia) - Treatment Priorities

  1. Optimize management of underlying lung disease (bronchodilators, ICS for COPD; antifibrotics for IPF)
  2. Long-term oxygen therapy (PaO₂ <55 mmHg or SaO₂ <88%)
  3. Inhaled treprostinil (TYVASO): INCREASE trial (2021) showed benefit in ILD-PAH (IPF + PH): ↑ 6MWD +21 m at 16 weeks, ↓ clinical worsening
  4. No routine PAH therapy for mild-moderate Group 3 PH
  5. Severe "out-of-proportion" Group 3 PH (mPAP >35-40 mmHg despite advanced lung disease): refer to specialized center; consider PAH therapy
  6. Lung transplantation for advanced disease
Harrison's Caution: Systemic vasodilators in Group 3 PH can worsen V/Q mismatch by increasing blood flow to poorly ventilated areas → worsening hypoxemia.

14.4 Group 4 - CTEPH - Treatment Priorities

Cornerstone: Decide operability first
CTEPH CONFIRMED (RHC + CTPA + V/Q Scan)
              |
    MULTIDISCIPLINARY EXPERT TEAM ASSESSMENT
    (technical operability + patient fitness)
              |
     OPERABLE          INOPERABLE or      RESIDUAL PH AFTER PEA
         |             PATIENT REFUSES           |
    PULMONARY               |              REASSESS AT 6 MONTHS
  ENDARTERECTOMY     BALLOON PULMONARY           |
   (PEA) - CURATIVE   ANGIOPLASTY (BPA)    If persistent PH:
         |             + Riociguat         Riociguat (CHESS-1+)
     ANTICOAGULANT      (CHEST-1 trial)    or BPA
   (LIFELONG: LMWH
    or VKA or DOAC)
Pulmonary Endarterectomy (PEA):
  • Surgical removal of organized thrombus from main, lobar, and segmental pulmonary arteries
  • Done via median sternotomy + cardiopulmonary bypass + deep hypothermic circulatory arrest
  • Can be curative - normalizes PVR in 70-80% of cases
  • Operative mortality: ~4-5% at expert centers
  • Prognosis: 5-year survival >80% post-PEA
Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty (BPA):
  • Catheter-based intervention for inoperable or distal CTEPH
  • Multiple sessions required (typically 4-6 sessions)
  • Complications: reperfusion pulmonary edema, vessel injury, hemoptysis
  • Riociguat + BPA combination increasingly used
Riociguat (CHESS-1 trial):
  • Approved for inoperable CTEPH or persistent/recurrent PH after PEA
  • Improved 6MWD +46 m vs. placebo; improved PVR, WHO FC
  • Class I recommendation for inoperable CTEPH (2022 ESC/ERS)

14.5 Group 5 - Miscellaneous

  • Treat underlying condition (e.g., steroids for sarcoidosis, hydroxycarbamide for sickle cell)
  • PAH-specific therapy may be considered on case-by-case basis
  • No prospective RCT data for most Group 5 conditions
  • Refer to expert PH center for individualized management

SECTION 15: SPECIAL SITUATIONS

15.1 Pregnancy and Contraception

Contraception MethodRecommendation
Progesterone-only pillPreferred oral contraceptive
Levonorgestrel/copper IUDHighly recommended
Barrier methods + combinedSecond line
Combined OCP (estrogen-containing)AVOID - ↑ VTE + vasoconstriction risk
If pregnancy occurs despite counseling:
  • Multidisciplinary team (cardiologist, obstetrician, anesthesiologist, intensivist)
  • IV epoprostenol as primary therapy during pregnancy
  • Elective cesarean section preferred (around 28-34 weeks depending on status)
  • Highest risk: peripartum and early postpartum period (acute RV failure)

15.2 Connective Tissue Disease-Associated PAH

Systemic Sclerosis (SSc-PAH):
  • Screen ALL SSc patients annually: Echo + DLCO
  • DETECT algorithm: for limited SSc patients with DLCO <60% predicted → echo + RHC
  • Respond less well to PAH therapy compared to IPAH
  • Macitentan + tadalafil combination → SERAPHIN + PHIRST data applicable
SLE-PAH:
  • Immunosuppression (cyclophosphamide + glucocorticoids) may reduce PAP → treat inflammatory component
  • PAH-specific therapy needed if vascular disease established
  • Better prognosis than SSc-PAH
MCTD-PAH:
  • Anti-U1-RNP antibodies
  • Intermediate prognosis between IPAH and SSc-PAH

15.3 Portopulmonary Hypertension

  • Definition: PAH in setting of portal hypertension (hepatic or non-hepatic)
  • Prevalence: ~5-10% of patients with portal hypertension
  • Mechanism: ↑ portal venous flow → ↑ pulmonary venous return → endothelial shear stress + humoral mediators (estrogens, gut-derived toxins)
  • Liver transplantation CONTRAINDICATED if mPAP >50 mmHg or PVR >5 WU
  • Treatment: ERA, PDE5i as first-line; IV prostanoids as bridge to transplant
  • Avoid β-blockers (used for portal hypertension) - worsen RV function in significant PH

15.4 HIV-Associated PAH

  • Prevalence: ~0.5% of HIV patients (higher than general population)
  • Mechanism: HIV envelope protein gp120 → endothelial apoptosis; inflammatory cytokines
  • Independent of CD4 count or viral load
  • Treatment: HAART does not reverse established PAH
  • PAH-specific therapy effective (similar to IPAH)
  • Bosentan: interaction with antiretrovirals (CYP3A4)
  • Prognosis: worse than IPAH; similar to CTD-PAH

15.5 CTEPH - Special Considerations

  • 3-5% of acute PE patients develop CTEPH
  • Underdiagnosed - median delay to diagnosis 14 months
  • 2022 ESC/ERS: All acute PE patients should have structured follow-up at 3-6 months (TTE assessment)
  • V/Q scan preferred over CTPA for CTEPH screening
  • Anticoagulation: lifelong in all CTEPH patients regardless of PEA
  • DOACs: widely used for anticoagulation in CTEPH (rivaroxaban, apixaban); less data than VKA but acceptable

SECTION 16: COMPLICATIONS

16.1 Right Ventricular Failure

  • Most common cause of death in PAH
  • Features: ↑ JVP, hepatomegaly, ascites, peripheral edema, ↓ BP, poor peripheral perfusion
  • Management of acute RV failure in PAH:
    • Optimize volume: cautious diuresis (avoid over-diuresis)
    • Optimize preload: small IV fluid challenge if underfilled
    • Vasopressors: norepinephrine (vasopressor of choice in cardiogenic shock with PH)
    • Avoid: tachycardia, hypotension, hypoxia, acidosis, hypercarbia (all worsen RV)
    • IV epoprostenol: initiate or escalate
    • Consider VA-ECMO as bridge to transplantation in refractory cases

16.2 Arrhythmias

  • Supraventricular tachycardias (SVT, atrial flutter, AF): poorly tolerated in PH
  • Loss of atrial "kick" → acute ↓ CO → hemodynamic collapse
  • Management: urgent electrical cardioversion if hemodynamically unstable
  • Rate control: digoxin or amiodarone (avoid β-blockers - worsen RV failure)
  • Anticoagulation: balance between CTEPH protection and bleeding risk

16.3 Hemoptysis

  • Occurs in advanced PAH, CTEPH, Eisenmenger syndrome, PVOD
  • Mechanism: rupture of dilated bronchial artery collaterals, plexiform lesions
  • Management: bronchial artery embolization; avoid anticoagulation escalation acutely

16.4 Syncope

  • Exertional syncope = ominous sign → WHO FC IV
  • Mechanism: inability to augment CO with exercise → cerebral hypoperfusion
  • Requires immediate escalation of therapy + listing for transplantation

16.5 Sudden Cardiac Death

  • Occurs in 5-10% of PAH patients
  • Mechanism: arrhythmia (VT/VF from RV hypertrophy/ischemia), acute RV failure
  • ICD: no evidence of benefit in PAH (unlike SCD prevention in HFrEF)

SECTION 17: PROGNOSIS

17.1 Historical vs Modern Survival

Era1-Year Survival3-Year Survival5-Year Survival
Pre-treatment era (<1990)~70%~48%~34%
Monotherapy era (1990-2010)~77%~60%~45%
Combination therapy era (>2010)~82%~67%~58%

17.2 Poor Prognostic Factors

  • WHO FC IV at diagnosis
  • 6MWD <165 m
  • NT-proBNP >1400 ng/L or BNP >200 pg/mL
  • RA area >26 cm²
  • TAPSE/sPAP <0.19 mm/mmHg
  • CI <2.0 L/min/m²
  • SvO₂ <60%
  • RVEF <37%
  • Pericardial effusion (moderate-large)
  • Syncope on exertion
  • Rapid progression
  • No response to vasoreactivity testing
  • CTD-PAH (especially SSc) vs IPAH

17.3 Good Prognostic Factors

  • Vasoreactivity positive → long-term CCB responder
  • Low-risk profile on 2022 ESC/ERS stratification
  • FC I-II, 6MWD >440 m, BNP <50 pg/mL
  • Young age, IPAH (vs APAH)
  • Achievement of low-risk status on follow-up

SECTION 18: IMPORTANT TABLES

Table 1: Hemodynamic Definitions Summary

DefinitionmPAPPAWPPVRGroups
Normal≤20≤15<2 WU-
Pre-capillary PH>20≤15>2 WU1, 3, 4, 5
Isolated post-capillary PH>20>15≤2 WU2, 5
Combined pre+post-capillary PH>20>15>2 WU2, 5
PAH (specific for Group 1)>20≤15>2 WUGroup 1

Table 2: WHO Classification Summary

GroupCategoryCommon ExamplesHemodynamic Pattern
1PAHIPAH, CTD-PAH, CHD-PAH, HIVPre-capillary
2Left heart diseaseHFpEF, HFrEF, MR, MS, ASPost-capillary
3Lung disease/hypoxiaCOPD, IPF, OSAPre-capillary
4PA obstruction/CTEPHChronic PE, angiosarcomaPre-capillary
5MiscellaneousSarcoidosis, SCD, MPN, LAMVariable

Table 3: Drug Comparison for PAH

Drug ClassDrugRoutePathwayHalf-LifeKey Trial
ERABosentanOralET-A+B5 hBREATHE-1
ERAAmbrisentanOralET-A9 hARIES-1/2
ERAMacitentanOralET-A+B16 hSERAPHIN
PDE5iSildenafilOralNO-cGMP4 hSUPER-1
PDE5iTadalafilOralNO-cGMP17.5 hPHIRST
sGC StimRiociguatOralNO-cGMP12 hPATENT-1
ProstanoidEpoprostenolIVPGI₂-cAMP3-5 minBarst 1996
ProstanoidTreprostinilIV/SC/inh/oralPGI₂-cAMP4 hTRIUMPH
ProstanoidIloprostInhaledPGI₂-cAMP20-30 minAIR
IP agonistSelexipagOralPGI₂-cAMP8-13 hGRIPHON

Table 4: CTEPH vs PAH - Key Differences

FeaturePAH (Group 1)CTEPH (Group 4)
MechanismVascular remodelingOrganized thrombus + remodeling
V/Q scanNormal or non-segmentalSegmental perfusion defects
CTPANormal PA or dilatedWebs, pouches, chronic thrombus
AnticoagulationNot routinely indicatedLifelong (all patients)
Specific treatmentPAH drugs (ERAs, PDE5i, prostanoids)PEA + riociguat + BPA
Curative therapyLung transplantationPEA (curative in 70-80%)
Vasoreactivity testAppropriate (IPAH/heritable)NOT indicated

Table 5: Pre-Capillary vs Post-Capillary PH

FeaturePre-CapillaryPost-Capillary
MechanismPulmonary arterial diseasePulmonary venous hypertension (from LHD)
PAWP≤15 mmHg>15 mmHg
PVR>2 WU≤2 WU (IpcPH) or >2 WU (CpcPH)
Groups1, 3, 4, 52, 5
PAH-specific drugsYESNO (for isolated IpcPH)
CXRClear fields or peripheral pruningPulmonary venous congestion

SECTION 19: FLOWCHARTS

Flowchart 1: Diagnostic Approach

CLINICAL SUSPICION
(Unexplained dyspnea, known associated condition)
                    ↓
          STEP 1: INITIAL EVALUATION
          - ECG, CXR, Pulse oximetry
          - BNP/NT-proBNP
          - CBC, LFTs, TFTs, ANA, anti-Scl-70
          - HIV, hepatitis serology
                    ↓
        STEP 2: ECHOCARDIOGRAM (Screening)
               ↓               ↓               ↓
         Low probability    Intermediate     High probability
         PH unlikely        probability      PH likely
                 ↓               ↓               ↓
          Consider other   PFTs + DLCO      Refer to PH center
          diagnoses        HRCT chest
                           V/Q scan                ↓
                           Sleep study      STEP 3: RHC (Gold Standard)
                                                    ↓
                    ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐
                    │        HEMODYNAMIC CLASSIFICATION         │
                    ├──────────────┬──────────────┬────────────┤
                    │ Pre-capillary│ Post-capillary│  Combined  │
                    │ PAWP ≤15     │ PAWP >15      │  PAWP >15  │
                    │ PVR >2       │ PVR ≤2        │  PVR >2    │
                    ├──────────────┼──────────────┼────────────┤
                    │Groups 1,3,4,5│   Group 2,5   │  Group 2,5 │
                    └──────────────┴──────────────┴────────────┘
                    ↓
          FURTHER DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP PER GROUP:
          Group 1 (PAH): V/Q, CTD screen, genetics
          Group 2: Echo, coronary angiography, LHD optimization
          Group 3: PFTs, HRCT, ABG
          Group 4 (CTEPH): V/Q, CTPA, DSA, operability assessment
          Group 5: Specific work-up per underlying condition

Flowchart 2: Pathophysiology of PAH

TRIGGER (Genetic predisposition: BMPR2 + environmental/immune trigger)
                                    ↓
                    ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION
                    ↙           ↓           ↘
           ↓ NO/PGI₂      ↑ Endothelin-1    Platelet activation
               ↓                 ↓                 ↓
        Vasoconstriction    Vasoconstriction    In situ thrombosis
        + proliferation     + proliferation
               ↓                 ↓                 ↓
              ___________________________________________
                                  ↓
                    PULMONARY VASCULAR REMODELING
                    (Intimal proliferation, medial hypertrophy,
                     adventitial fibrosis, plexiform lesions)
                                  ↓
                      PROGRESSIVE ↑ PVR + ↑ mPAP
                                  ↓
                     RV PRESSURE OVERLOAD
                         ↙                 ↘
              ADAPTIVE (early)         MALADAPTIVE (late)
           RV hypertrophy              RV dilatation
           ↑ RV systolic P             Septal D-shift
           Normal CO                  TR, ↓ CO
                                       Venous congestion
                                       Multi-organ failure → DEATH

Flowchart 3: Treatment Algorithm (2022 ESC/ERS)

NEWLY DIAGNOSED PAH (after RHC confirmation)
                    ↓
         GENERAL MEASURES + SUPPORTIVE CARE
         (O₂, diuretics, anticoagulation per indication,
          exercise rehabilitation, contraception, vaccinations)
                    ↓
         VASOREACTIVITY TESTING?
         (IPAH/Heritable PAH only)
              ↙                    ↘
         POSITIVE               NEGATIVE
        (<5%)                  (>95%)
            ↓                      ↓
      CALCIUM CHANNEL         RISK STRATIFICATION
      BLOCKERS (CCB)          (WHO FC + 6MWD + BNP + Echo + hemodynamics)
            ↓                        ↙               ↓              ↘
      Reassess 3-6 months       LOW RISK         INT RISK         HIGH RISK
      Adequate? → continue     (FC I-II)         (FC III)          (FC IV)
      Inadequate? → PAH therapy      ↓                ↓                 ↓
                           Oral combination    Oral combination    Triple combo:
                           ERA + PDE5i        ERA + PDE5i          ERA + PDE5i
                           (Macitentan +      or ERA + riociguat    + IV Epoprostenol
                            Tadalafil)         ± selexipag         or IV Treprostinil
                                  ↓                ↓                    ↓
                         REASSESS AT 3-6 MONTHS (Risk stratification)
                                        ↓
                             ACHIEVED LOW RISK? → Continue
                                        ↓
                                   NO → Escalate:
                                   Add third agent (selexipag)
                                   or switch prostanoid to IV
                                        ↓
                             STILL HIGH RISK?
                                        ↓
                                LUNG TRANSPLANT LISTING
                                (bilateral or heart-lung)

Flowchart 4: CTEPH Management

DOCUMENTED CTEPH (RHC + V/Q + CTPA)
                    ↓
         LIFELONG ANTICOAGULATION (all patients)
                    ↓
        MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM ASSESSMENT
        (Surgeons + Interventionalists + PH specialists)
              ↙                           ↘
         OPERABLE                    INOPERABLE
              ↓                      (distal disease, comorbidities)
    PULMONARY ENDARTERECTOMY                ↓
    (PEA) - Surgery of choice         RIOCIGUAT (Class I)
         ↓                              +/- BPA (multiple sessions)
    Reassess at 6 months                     ↓
    Persistent PH?                     Reassess response
         ↓                                   ↓
    → Riociguat                        Transplantation if refractory
    → BPA (for residual distal disease)

SECTION 20: HIGH-YIELD EXAM PEARLS

20.1 Harrison's Key Points (22nd Edition)

  1. mPAP >20 mmHg (not ≥25 mmHg) is the current threshold for PH diagnosis
  2. Normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg; upper limit of normal = ~20 mmHg
  3. RHC is the gold standard for PH diagnosis
  4. BMPR2 mutations are found in ~75% familial PAH and ~25% sporadic IPAH; incomplete penetrance (15-20%)
  5. Vasoreactivity testing in IPAH/heritable PAH only; positive = ↓mPAP ≥10 mmHg to ≤40 mmHg without ↓CO
  6. Only <5% of IPAH are vasoreactive
  7. Epoprostenol IV is the ONLY PAH drug proven to improve survival in a landmark RCT
  8. Schistosomiasis affects >230 million globally; 5% develop PAH → one of the most common causes worldwide
  9. SCD (sickle cell disease): PH in 6-10% of patients
  10. CTEPH (Group 4): organized thrombus, not fresh PE; V/Q scan preferred screening tool
  11. PEA (pulmonary endarterectomy) can be curative for CTEPH
  12. PAH in SSc accounts for 30% of SSc deaths
  13. Pregnancy is CONTRAINDICATED in PAH; maternal mortality ~30-50%
  14. PAH-specific drugs NOT indicated in Group 2 (IpcPH); riociguat caused harm in HFpEF
  15. Riociguat - ONLY PAH drug approved for both PAH and CTEPH
  16. EIF2AK4 biallelic mutations are specific to PVOD/PCH

20.2 2022 ESC/ERS Guideline Updates vs Previous (2015)

Parameter2015 ESC/ERS2022 ESC/ERS
PH definitionmPAP ≥25 mmHgmPAP >20 mmHg
PVR threshold (PAH)>3 WU>2 WU
Exercise PHNot definedmPAP/CO slope >3 mmHg/L/min
Initial PAH therapySequential monotherapy or dualInitial oral combination (dual ERA+PDE5i) preferred
Anticoagulation IPAHClass IIa (recommended)Class IIb (may be considered) - downgraded
Risk model3-strata (low/int/high)4-strata: low/IL/IH/high
BPA for CTEPHEmergingClass I for inoperable CTEPH
Riociguat CTEPHApprovedConfirmed Class I
Exercise rehabClass IIbClass I
6th WSPH vs 2022Some differencesLargely harmonized

20.3 Frequently Asked MD/DNB/DM Examination Questions

Q1: What is the current hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension? A: mPAP >20 mmHg at rest (by RHC). Pre-capillary PH additionally requires PAWP ≤15 mmHg and PVR >2 WU.
Q2: What changed from the previous definition? A: Previous threshold was ≥25 mmHg. Changed to >20 mmHg based on normative data (normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg; 20 mmHg = 97.5th percentile). PVR threshold also lowered from >3 WU to >2 WU.
Q3: What gene mutation is most commonly associated with familial PAH? A: BMPR2 (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2) - ~75% familial, ~25% sporadic. Autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance (15-20%).
Q4: Which gene mutation is specific to PVOD/PCH? A: EIF2AK4 (biallelic loss-of-function mutations; autosomal recessive).
Q5: What is the significance of vasoreactivity testing? A: Identifies <5% of IPAH patients who respond to long-term CCBs. Positive = ↓mPAP ≥10 mmHg, absolute ≤40 mmHg, no ↓CO. Test should only be performed in IPAH/heritable PAH.
Q6: What is the most common cause of PH worldwide? A: Group 2 (Left heart disease - HFpEF, HFrEF, mitral valve disease) is the most common overall cause of PH.
Q7: Which investigation is preferred for CTEPH screening? A: V/Q (ventilation-perfusion) scan (sensitivity ~97% for CTEPH via segmental perfusion defects). Preferred over CTPA which can miss distal disease.
Q8: What is the only PAH drug with proven mortality benefit in a randomized trial? A: Epoprostenol (IV prostacyclin) - Barst et al., NEJM 1996. RCT showed improved survival in severe PAH. All other trials used morbidity-mortality composite endpoints.
Q9: Which PAH-specific drug is approved for CTEPH? A: Riociguat (sGC stimulator) - approved for inoperable CTEPH and persistent/recurrent PH after PEA (CHEST-1 trial).
Q10: What is the initial treatment strategy for newly diagnosed PAH in 2022 ESC/ERS? A: Initial ORAL COMBINATION THERAPY with ERA + PDE5i (e.g., macitentan + tadalafil) for most patients. FC IV or high-risk patients: triple therapy including IV epoprostenol.
Q11: Why are PAH drugs contraindicated in Group 2 PH? A: Systemic vasodilation without reducing pulmonary venous pressure → pulmonary edema. Riociguat/sildenafil trials in HFpEF showed ↑ hospitalizations, no mortality benefit.
Q12: What is the "gray zone" in PH diagnosis? A: mPAP 21-24 mmHg with PVR 2-3 WU. These patients meet new hemodynamic criteria but have no approved therapies. They require careful monitoring.
Q13: Name the 3 molecular pathways targeted in PAH therapy. A: 1) Endothelin pathway (ERAs), 2) Nitric oxide/cGMP pathway (PDE5i, sGC stimulators), 3) Prostacyclin/cAMP pathway (prostanoids, IP receptor agonists)
Q14: What is the prognostic significance of pericardial effusion in PAH? A: High-risk marker (2022 ESC/ERS stratification). Indicates severe RV failure, venous hypertension, poor prognosis. Moderate-large pericardial effusion = high-risk category.

20.4 Clinical Pearls

  1. "Loud P2" is the most consistent physical sign of PH - heard at left upper sternal border (not apex)
  2. Pre-syncope or syncope on exertion = WHO FC IV = urgent treatment escalation/transplant referral
  3. PVOD/PCH: suspect when DLCO severely reduced, HRCT shows GGO + septal lines + lymphadenopathy. Avoid standard PAH vasodilators - risk of fatal pulmonary edema
  4. Portopulmonary PH: β-blockers used for portal hypertension management should be stopped if significant PH develops (worsen RV function)
  5. Diltiazem preferred over nifedipine in vasoreactive patients with tachycardia (diltiazem slows HR)
  6. V/Q BEFORE CTPA in all unexplained PH patients to exclude CTEPH
  7. D-shaped interventricular septum on echo/CT = RV pressure overload (pushes septum into LV in systole)
  8. TAPSE/sPAP ratio is the key RV-PA coupling parameter: <0.19 mm/mmHg = high risk (RV uncoupled from PA)
  9. The "silent zone" of PH: RHC abnormal, echo inconclusive - always trust RHC over echo
  10. Macitentan (SERAPHIN trial) was the first PAH trial to use morbidity AND mortality as primary endpoint (previously only 6MWD)

20.5 Mnemonics

PAH Drug Classes - "EPICS":
  • E - Endothelin receptor antagonists (bosentan, ambrisentan, macitentan)
  • P - PDE-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil)
  • I - IP receptor agonist (selexipag)
  • C - Calcium channel blockers (vasoreactive only)
  • S - Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators (riociguat)
  • (+ Prostanoids: epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost)
Vasoreactivity Positive Criteria - "10-40-NO CO DROP":
  • Drop in mPAP by ≥10 mmHg
  • Absolute mPAP ≤40 mmHg
  • NO decrease in cardiac output
WHO Groups - "PALE Mix":
  • P - PAH (Group 1 - Pulmonary Arterial)
  • A - Left hEArt disease (Group 2)
  • L - Lung disease/hypoxia (Group 3)
  • E - pulmonary artEry Emboli/CTEPH (Group 4)
  • Mix - Miscellaneous (Group 5)
Poor Prognostic Markers - "SPEED":
  • S - Syncope on exertion, Severe RV failure signs
  • P - Poor 6MWD (<165 m), Pericardial effusion
  • E - Elevated BNP/NT-proBNP, Ejection fraction of RV <37%
  • E - Elevated RAP >14, Elevated PVR
  • D - Decreased CI (<2.0 L/min/m²), Decreased SvO₂ (<60%)

SUMMARY BOX: "TOP 20 EXAM-READY FACTS"

#Fact
1PH = mPAP >20 mmHg (RHC); changed from ≥25 mmHg in 2022 ESC/ERS
2Normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg
3BMPR2 mutation in 75% familial PAH; incomplete penetrance 15-20%
4EIF2AK4 = PVOD/PCH specific mutation
5Vasoreactive = <5% of IPAH; positive = ↓mPAP ≥10 to ≤40 mmHg, no ↓CO
6V/Q scan is BEST screening tool for CTEPH (sensitivity ~97%)
7Epoprostenol IV = ONLY drug with survival benefit in RCT
8Riociguat = ONLY PAH drug approved for CTEPH
9Initial therapy = ERA + PDE5i combination (2022 ESC/ERS)
10PAH drugs CONTRAINDICATED in Group 2 (isolated post-capillary PH)
11Pregnancy CONTRAINDICATED in PAH (mortality 30-50%)
12PEA = curative in 70-80% operable CTEPH
13Lifelong anticoagulation in ALL CTEPH patients
14Schistosomiasis = most common cause of PAH worldwide (5% of infected develop PAH)
15SSc-PAH = 30% of SSc deaths; screen all SSc annually
16TAPSE/sPAP <0.19 mm/mmHg = RV-PA uncoupling, high risk
17PDE5i + riociguat = ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED together
18Anti-centromere antibody in limited SSc = highest PAH risk
19TAPSE <18 mm = RV systolic dysfunction
20Portopulmonary PH: mPAP >50 mmHg or PVR >5 WU = contraindication to liver transplant

Sources: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22nd Edition (2025, McGraw-Hill); Murray & Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine (2022); 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension (Humbert M et al., Eur Heart J 2022; PMID: 36017548); Updated Hemodynamic Definitions and Clinical Classification review (PMC10971453)

Make it concise, delete double double thing

PULMONARY HYPERTENSION

Comprehensive PG Notes — MD/DM/DNB Internal Medicine

Based on Harrison's 22E + 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines

1. DEFINITION

Current Hemodynamic Definition (2018 WSPH / 2022 ESC/ERS)

PH = mPAP > 20 mmHg at rest, measured by right heart catheterization (RHC)
Why the change from ≥25 mmHg? Normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg. Two SDs above mean = ~20.6 mmHg (97.5th percentile). Studies in >16,000 patients confirmed mPAP 21-24 mmHg carries increased mortality (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.7).

Normal Values

ParameterNormal
mPAP14 ± 3.3 mmHg (upper limit ~20 mmHg)
PAWP8 ± 2.9 mmHg
PVR0.93 ± 0.38 WU
Cardiac Index2.5-4.0 L/min/m²

Hemodynamic Definitions

CategorymPAPPAWPPVRGroups
Normal≤20≤15<2 WU-
Pre-capillary PH>20≤15>2 WU1, 3, 4, 5
Isolated post-capillary PH>20>15≤2 WU2, 5
Combined pre+post-capillary PH>20>15>2 WU2, 5

Changes from Previous (2015) Guidelines

Feature20152022
mPAP threshold≥25 mmHg>20 mmHg
PVR (pre-capillary)>3 WU>2 WU
Exercise PHNot definedmPAP/CO slope >3 mmHg/L/min
Initial PAH therapySequential monotherapyInitial oral combination
Anticoagulation IPAHClass IIaClass IIb (downgraded)
Exercise rehabClass IIbClass I
Risk model3-strata4-strata (Low/IL/IH/High)
Gray zone: mPAP 21-24 mmHg with PVR 2-3 WU = meets new criteria but no approved therapies yet

2. EPIDEMIOLOGY

  • Overall PH prevalence: 99-127 per 100,000 population
  • Group 2 (LHD) = most common form (~80% of all PH)
  • PAH (Group 1): prevalence 15-50 per million; rarest form
  • IPAH comprises ~50% of PAH; CTD-PAH ~25%
  • Women > Men (especially PAH); female:male ratio ~2-4:1
  • PH may be as common as multiple sclerosis, twice as common as IPF
India-specific: Mitral stenosis (rheumatic), CTD-PAH, IPAH, CTEPH, congenital heart disease; schistosomiasis relevant in tropical areas
Survival (modern combination therapy era):
  • 1-year: ~82% | 3-year: ~67% | 5-year: ~58%
  • Pre-treatment era: median survival ~2.8 years from diagnosis

3. ETIOLOGY — WHO CLASSIFICATION (6th WSPH / 2022 ESC/ERS)

GROUP 1 - PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION (PAH)
  1.1 Idiopathic (IPAH)
      1.1.1 Non-vasoreactive
      1.1.2 Vasoreactive (long-term CCB responders) ← NEW subcategory
  1.2 Heritable (BMPR2, ALK1, ENG, SMAD9, CAV1, KCNK3, EIF2AK4, TBX4)
  1.3 Drug/toxin-induced (fenfluramine, dasatinib, amphetamines)
  1.4 Associated PAH:
      1.4.1 Connective tissue disease (SSc, SLE, MCTD)
      1.4.2 HIV
      1.4.3 Portal hypertension
      1.4.4 Congenital heart disease (Eisenmenger)
      1.4.5 Schistosomiasis
  1.5 CCB long-term responders (NEW separate category)
  1.6 PVOD / PCH (overt venous/capillary involvement)
  1.7 Persistent PH of the newborn (PPHN)

GROUP 2 - LEFT HEART DISEASE
  HFpEF (most common), HFrEF, Mitral/aortic valve disease

GROUP 3 - LUNG DISEASE / HYPOXIA
  COPD, IPF/ILD, OSA, alveolar hypoventilation, high altitude

GROUP 4 - PA OBSTRUCTIONS
  CTEPH (most common), angiosarcoma, arteritis, congenital PA stenosis

GROUP 5 - MISCELLANEOUS / MULTIFACTORIAL
  Sickle cell (6-10%), sarcoidosis, myeloproliferative, LAM, thyroid disease

Key Genetic Mutations

GenePathwayNotes
BMPR2TGF-β/BMP75% familial, 25% sporadic; incomplete penetrance 15-20%
ALK1, ENGTGF-βHHT-associated
CAV1Lipid raftRare
KCNK3K⁺ channelRare
EIF2AK4Stress responseSpecific to PVOD/PCH; biallelic, autosomal recessive
TBX4Lung developmentPediatric PAH

4. PULMONARY CIRCULATION PHYSIOLOGY

PVR formula: PVR (WU) = (mPAP - PAWP) / CO
RV-PA Coupling:
  • Ratio of RV contractility (Ees) to arterial elastance (Ea)
  • Ees/Ea ≥1.5 = coupled (normal); <0.8 = uncoupled (maladaptive)
  • Echo surrogate: TAPSE/sPAP >0.32 = low risk; <0.19 = high risk
Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction: Main defence against V/Q mismatch; exacerbates PH in Group 3

5. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Three Core Pathways

ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION
        ↙              ↓               ↘
  ↓ NO / ↑ PDE5    ↑ Endothelin-1    ↓ PGI₂ / ↑ TXA₂
  (vasoconstriction  (vasoconstriction  (vasoconstriction
   + proliferation)   + proliferation)   + thrombosis)
        ↘              ↓               ↙
           PULMONARY VASCULAR REMODELING
     (medial hypertrophy, intimal fibrosis, plexiform lesions)
                        ↓
              ↑ PVR → ↑ mPAP → RV overload
                        ↓
        ┌───────────────────────────────┐
        │ ADAPTIVE          MALADAPTIVE │
        │ RV hypertrophy    RV dilatation│
        │ Normal CO         ↓ CO, TR     │
        │                  Organ failure │
        └───────────────────────────────┘
NO pathway: ↓ eNOS → ↓ cGMP → vasoconstriction. Target: PDE5i (↑ cGMP), sGC stimulators (riociguat)
Prostacyclin pathway: ↓ PGI₂ / ↑ TXA₂ → vasoconstriction + platelet aggregation + in situ thrombosis. Target: prostanoids, IP receptor agonists
Endothelin pathway: ↑ ET-1 → ET-A (vasoconstriction + proliferation); ET-B (clearance/vasodilation). Target: ERAs
Plexiform lesions: Pathognomonic of advanced PAH; disordered angioproliferative lesions at arteriolar bifurcations; monoclonal apoptosis-resistant endothelial cells
RV Failure sequence:
↑ PVR → RV hypertrophy → RV dilatation → D-shaped septum
→ ↓ LV filling → ↓ CO → venous congestion → death

6. WHO FUNCTIONAL CLASS

ClassDefinition
INo limitation; ordinary activity symptom-free
IISlight limitation; ordinary activity causes dyspnea/fatigue
IIIMarked limitation; less-than-ordinary activity causes symptoms
IVSymptoms at rest; any activity worsens; signs of RV failure

7. CLINICAL FEATURES

Symptoms (by progression)

  • Early: Exertional dyspnea (most common first symptom), fatigue
  • Intermediate: Chest pain (RV ischemia), pre-syncope on exertion
  • Late: Exertional syncope (= FC IV, ominous), orthopnea, edema, ascites, hemoptysis

Physical Signs

SignSignificance
Loud P2Most consistent sign of PH
Left parasternal heaveRV hypertrophy
TR murmur (holosystolic, LLSB)Functional TR from RV dilation
Graham Steell murmurPR murmur from pulmonary HTN
Elevated JVPRV failure
Pulsatile hepatomegalyTR + RV failure
Peripheral edema, ascitesAdvanced RV failure
Telangiectasias, sclerodactylySSc-PAH
ClubbingEisenmenger/PVOD

Red Flag Features (immediate referral)

  • Syncope on mild exertion
  • Rapid symptom progression
  • 6MWD <165 m
  • Signs of right heart failure
  • Estimated mPAP >50 mmHg on echo

8. DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH

Three-Step Algorithm (2022 ESC/ERS)

STEP 1 — SUSPICION (GP/Physician)
↓
ECG + CXR + O₂ saturation + basic bloods
↓
STEP 2 — DETECTION (Echocardiogram)
↓
TRV ≤2.8 m/s → Low probability
TRV 2.9-3.4 m/s ± signs → Intermediate
TRV >3.4 m/s OR 2.9-3.4 + signs → High
+ PFTs, HRCT, V/Q scan, sleep study
↓
STEP 3 — CONFIRMATION (PH Center)
Right Heart Catheterization (GOLD STANDARD)
+ vasoreactivity testing if indicated

Investigation Findings

InvestigationKey Findings in PH
ECGRAD, RVH (R>S in V1), P pulmonale, RBBB, RV strain V1-V4
CXREnlarged main PA (>2.9 cm), peripheral pruning, RV/RA enlargement
EchoTRV >2.8 m/s, RV enlargement, D-shaped septum, TAPSE <18 mm, pericardial effusion
PFTsNormal in IPAH; reduced DLCO (PAH, CTD-PAH); obstruction (COPD); restriction (ILD)
V/Q scanSegmental perfusion defects (CTEPH) - sensitivity ~97%; non-segmental/normal in PAH
HRCTEnlarged main PA; mosaic attenuation (CTEPH); GGO + septal lines (PVOD/PCH)
Cardiac MRIGold standard for RV volumes; RVEF, RVESVI, SVI
RHCmPAP, PAWP, PVR, CO, RAP, SvO₂ - confirms diagnosis
V/Q BEFORE CTPA in all unexplained PH - higher sensitivity for CTEPH

Vasoreactivity Testing

  • Who: IPAH and heritable PAH only (NOT CTD-PAH, CTEPH, APAH)
  • Agent: Inhaled NO (10-20 ppm) or inhaled epoprostenol (preferred)
  • Positive (Sitbon criteria): ↓mPAP ≥10 mmHg → absolute ≤40 mmHg, no ↓CO
  • Significance: <5% are positive → eligible for long-term CCBs

Blood Investigations

TestRationale
ANA, anti-Scl-70, anti-centromere, anti-dsDNACTD screen
HIV, Hepatitis B/CAssociated PAH causes
LFTs, coagulationPortal hypertension
TFTsGroup 5 (thyroid-related PH)
Antiphospholipid antibodiesCTEPH risk factor
BNP / NT-proBNPPrognostic biomarker

9. RISK STRATIFICATION (2022 ESC/ERS)

Four-Strata Model

VariableLOWINT-LOWINT-HIGHHIGH
WHO FCI-IIII-IIIIIIIV
6MWD>440 m320-440 m165-320 m<165 m
BNP<50 pg/mL50-20050-200>200
NT-proBNP<300 ng/L300-1400300-1400>1400
RA area<18 cm²18-2618-26>26 cm²
TAPSE/sPAP>0.320.19-0.320.19-0.32<0.19
cMRI RVEF>54%37-54%37-54%<37%
RAP<8 mmHg8-148-14>14 mmHg
CI≥2.5 L/min/m²2.0-2.42.0-2.4<2.0
SvO₂>65%60-65%60-65%<60%
Goal of treatment = achieve LOW RISK status

10. TREATMENT

General Measures

MeasureDetails
OxygenMaintain SpO₂ >92%; LTOT in Group 3
DiureticsLoop diuretics ± aldosterone antagonist for RV failure; avoid over-diuresis
DigoxinRate control in AF; no survival benefit
AnticoagulationLifelong in ALL CTEPH; IPAH only Class IIb (not routine); avoid in SSc-PAH
Iron supplementationIV preferred; improves 6MWD in iron-deficient PAH
ContraceptionProgesterone-only pill or IUD; avoid estrogen-containing OCP
VaccinationPneumococcal + influenza
Exercise rehabClass I (2022 ESC/ERS); supervised; avoid exhaustion
PregnancyCONTRAINDICATED (Class III - Harm); maternal mortality 30-50%

11. PAH-SPECIFIC PHARMACOTHERAPY

Drug Classes Summary

ClassDrugRouteKey TrialNotes
ERABosentanOralBREATHE-1Dual; monthly LFTs; teratogenic
ERAAmbrisentanOralARIES-1/2ET-A selective; less hepatotoxic
ERAMacitentanOralSERAPHINDual, tissue-penetrant; ↓ Hgb; first M+M endpoint trial
PDE5iSildenafilOral TDSSUPER-14h half-life
PDE5iTadalafilOral ODPHIRST17.5h; once-daily advantage
sGC stimRiociguatOral TDSPATENT-1/CHEST-1Only drug for both PAH AND CTEPH
ProstanoidEpoprostenolIVBarst 1996Only drug with RCT mortality benefit; t½ 3-5 min
ProstanoidTreprostinilIV/SC/inh/oralTRIUMPHSC causes injection site pain
ProstanoidIloprostInhaledAIR6-9 inhalations/day
IP agonistSelexipagOralGRIPHONSelective IP receptor; ↓ morbidity/mortality 40%
CCBNifedipine/DiltiazemOral-Vasoreactive patients ONLY

Critical Contraindications

  • PDE5i + riociguat = ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED (synergistic hypotension)
  • CCBs in non-vasoreactive patients = risk of acute RV failure/death
  • PAH-specific drugs in Group 2 IpcPH = no benefit; riociguat caused harm in HFpEF trials
  • ERAs in pregnancy = teratogenic (Category X)

Treatment Algorithm

NEW PAH DIAGNOSIS (confirmed by RHC)
            ↓
VASOREACTIVITY TEST? (IPAH/Heritable only)
    ↙ POSITIVE             ↘ NEGATIVE
  (<5%)                      (>95%)
      ↓                           ↓
Long-term CCB            RISK STRATIFICATION
      ↓                    ↙          ↓          ↘
Reassess 3-6 m       LOW/INT       INT-HIGH      HIGH/FC IV
Adequate→continue    RISK          RISK          RISK
Inadequate→switch        ↓              ↓             ↓
                   Oral dual     Oral dual      Triple combo:
                 combination  combination +   ERA + PDE5i +
                 ERA + PDE5i  consider add-on  IV Epoprostenol
                 (Macitentan    (Selexipag)
                 + Tadalafil)
                             ↓
            REASSESS AT 3-6 MONTHS
                    ↓              ↓
           ACHIEVED LOW RISK    NOT ACHIEVED
           → Continue           → Escalate / Add 3rd agent
                                → Lung transplant listing

12. MANAGEMENT BY WHO GROUP

Group 1 (PAH)

  • Confirm by RHC → vasoreactivity test (IPAH/heritable) → risk stratify → combination oral therapy
  • FC IV / high risk: IV epoprostenol first-line
  • SSc-PAH: annual screening; worse prognosis than IPAH
  • Congenital/Eisenmenger: bosentan (BREATHE-5); avoid systemic vasodilators that drop SVR without ↓PVR
  • Portopulmonary: stop β-blockers if PH significant; mPAP >50 or PVR >5 WU = contraindication to liver transplant

Group 2 (Left Heart Disease)

  • Optimize underlying LHD (diuretics, ACEi, β-blocker, valve surgery)
  • NO PAH-specific drugs for isolated post-capillary PH
  • Mitral valve surgery may resolve PH

Group 3 (Lung Disease/Hypoxia)

  • Optimize lung disease + supplemental O₂
  • Inhaled treprostinil: approved for ILD-associated PH (INCREASE trial: ↑6MWD +21 m)
  • Avoid systemic vasodilators → worsen V/Q mismatch → worsening hypoxemia
  • Severe "out-of-proportion" PH: refer to specialist center

Group 4 (CTEPH)

CTEPH CONFIRMED
      ↓
LIFELONG ANTICOAGULATION (all patients)
      ↓
MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSESSMENT
    ↙                     ↘
OPERABLE               INOPERABLE
    ↓                       ↓
PULMONARY               RIOCIGUAT (Class I)
ENDARTERECTOMY          + BPA (multiple sessions)
(PEA) — curative
70-80% normalize PVR
Op mortality ~4-5%
    ↓
Residual PH at 6 months?
→ Riociguat + BPA

Group 5 (Miscellaneous)

  • Treat underlying condition; PAH therapy case-by-case; no RCT data

13. SPECIAL SITUATIONS

SituationKey Points
PregnancyCONTRAINDICATED; maternal mortality 30-50%; IV epoprostenol if occurs; cesarean ~28-34 weeks
SSc-PAHScreen ALL SSc annually; anti-centromere = highest risk; 30% of SSc deaths
SLE-PAHImmunosuppression may help; better prognosis than SSc-PAH
Portopulmonary PHStop β-blockers; PH must be controlled before liver transplant
HIV-PAHHAART doesn't reverse PAH; treat as IPAH; drug interactions with ERAs
EisenmengerBosentan proven; avoid pulmonary vasodilators that drop SVR selectively
CTEPH3-5% of PE patients; V/Q screening; all need anticoagulation; PEA if operable

14. COMPLICATIONS

ComplicationNotes
RV failureMost common cause of death; norepinephrine for shock; VA-ECMO as bridge
AF/Atrial flutterPoorly tolerated; urgent cardioversion if unstable; digoxin/amiodarone for rate control
HemoptysisBronchial artery embolization; avoid anticoagulation escalation
Syncope= FC IV; urgent escalation + transplant referral
Sudden cardiac death5-10% of PAH; ICD not proven beneficial

15. PROGNOSIS

Poor prognostic factors — mnemonic "SPEED":
  • S — Syncope on exertion, Signs of RV failure
  • P — Poor 6MWD (<165 m), Pericardial effusion
  • E — Elevated BNP (>200), RVEF <37%
  • E — Elevated RAP >14 mmHg, Elevated PVR
  • D — Decreased CI (<2.0 L/min/m²), Decreased SvO₂ (<60%)
Good prognostic factors: Vasoreactive (CCB responder), low-risk profile, FC I-II, 6MWD >440 m, IPAH (vs CTD-PAH)

16. HIGH-YIELD EXAM PEARLS

Must-Know Facts

  1. PH threshold changed from ≥25 to >20 mmHg in 2022; normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg
  2. BMPR2 — 75% familial PAH; incomplete penetrance 15-20%
  3. EIF2AK4 — specific to PVOD/PCH; biallelic, autosomal recessive
  4. Vasoreactive = <5% of IPAH; criteria: ↓mPAP ≥10 mmHg → absolute ≤40 mmHg, no ↓CO
  5. Epoprostenol IV = only PAH drug with RCT mortality benefit
  6. Riociguat = only drug approved for both PAH AND CTEPH
  7. V/Q scan preferred over CTPA for CTEPH screening (sensitivity ~97%)
  8. PEA = curative in 70-80% of operable CTEPH
  9. Pregnancy = CONTRAINDICATED in PAH (maternal mortality 30-50%)
  10. PAH drugs in Group 2 IpcPH = NO; riociguat caused harm in HFpEF trials
  11. PDE5i + riociguat = ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED
  12. Schistosomiasis — 5% of >230 million infected develop PAH (major global cause)
  13. SSc-PAH = 30% of SSc deaths; screen ALL SSc annually
  14. CTEPH: lifelong anticoagulation in ALL patients regardless of PEA
  15. TAPSE/sPAP <0.19 mm/mmHg = RV-PA uncoupling = high risk
  16. Portopulmonary PH: mPAP >50 or PVR >5 WU = contraindication to liver transplant
  17. Initial 2022 ESC/ERS therapy = oral combination (ERA + PDE5i) not monotherapy
  18. Inhaled treprostinil approved for ILD-associated PH (Group 3; INCREASE trial)
  19. D-shaped septum on echo = RV pressure overload pushing into LV in systole
  20. PVOD/PCH: severely reduced DLCO + GGO on HRCT + risk of fatal edema with vasodilators

Common Viva Questions

Q: What changed in the 2022 PH definition? mPAP threshold lowered from ≥25 to >20 mmHg; PVR from >3 to >2 WU; exercise PH re-introduced; DPG de-emphasized.
Q: How do you confirm vasoreactivity? Inhaled NO or epoprostenol. Positive = ↓mPAP ≥10 mmHg to absolute ≤40 mmHg without fall in CO.
Q: Why avoid PAH drugs in Group 2 PH? They reduce pulmonary vascular tone without addressing elevated PAWP → fluid redistribution into alveoli → pulmonary edema.
Q: Which PAH drug also treats CTEPH? Riociguat — sGC stimulator; Class I for inoperable CTEPH (CHEST-1 trial: ↑6MWD +46 m).
Q: What is initial therapy for newly diagnosed high-risk PAH? Triple combination: ERA + PDE5i + IV epoprostenol (or IV treprostinil). Aim for low-risk status at 3-6 months.

Mnemonics

PAH Drug Classes — "EPICS+P":
  • ERA (bosentan, ambrisentan, macitentan)
  • PDE5i (sildenafil, tadalafil)
  • IP receptor agonist (selexipag)
  • CCB (vasoreactive only)
  • SGC stimulator (riociguat)
  • Prostanoids (epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost)
WHO Groups — "PALE M":
  • PAH (Group 1)
  • Aleft heart disease (Group 2)
  • Lung disease (Group 3)
  • Embolic/CTEPH (Group 4)
  • Miscellaneous (Group 5)
Vasoreactivity Positive — "10-40, CO stays":
  • Drop ≥10 mmHg, absolute ≤40 mmHg, CO does not drop

SUMMARY TABLE: Pre-Capillary vs Post-Capillary PH

FeaturePre-CapillaryPost-Capillary (Isolated)Combined
PAWP≤15 mmHg>15 mmHg>15 mmHg
PVR>2 WU≤2 WU>2 WU
Groups1, 3, 4, 52, 52, 5
PAH drugsYESNOSelected cases only
CXRClear fields / pruningVenous congestionMixed

Sources: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22nd Ed (2025); Murray & Nadel's Respiratory Medicine; 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines — Humbert M et al., Eur Heart J 2022, PMID 36017548

Add more information about who management with drugs

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

ESC ERS 2022 pulmonary hypertension WHO group management drugs treatment algorithm Group 1 2 3 4 5

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
I now have all the detailed drug data from Harrison's 22E including sotatercept, AMBITION trial, STELLAR trial, and group-specific management. Here is the expanded section:

MANAGEMENT BY WHO GROUP — DETAILED DRUG THERAPY


GROUP 1 — PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION (PAH)

Treatment Goal

Achieve low clinical risk = 1-year mortality <5%, defined as: WHO FC I-II + 6MWD >440 m + cardiac index ≥2.5 L/min/m² + low BNP/NT-proBNP.

Step 1 — Vasoreactivity Testing (IPAH/Heritable PAH only)

ResultAction
Positive (<5%)Long-term oral CCB (nifedipine/diltiazem/amlodipine)
Negative (>95%)Proceed to risk-stratified combination therapy
CCB dosing when vasoreactive:
  • Nifedipine ER: 30-240 mg/day (preferred if HR ≤100)
  • Diltiazem: 240-720 mg/day (preferred if HR >100, slows rate)
  • Amlodipine: 2.5-20 mg/day (good tolerability)
  • Re-assess at 3-6 months; if inadequate response → switch to PAH-specific drugs
  • Verapamil AVOIDED — negative inotropic effect worsens RV function

Step 2 — Risk-Stratified Initial Therapy (2022 ESC/ERS)

Key principle from Harrison's 22E: "Treatment-naïve incident PAH patients treated with up-front combination ambrisentan + tadalafil had 50% lower risk of clinical worsening vs monotherapy" (AMBITION trial, n=500)

A. Patients WITHOUT Cardiopulmonary Comorbidities

RiskRecommended Initial TherapyClass
Low / Intermediate-LowOral dual combination: ERA + PDE5i (e.g., Macitentan 10 mg OD + Tadalafil 40 mg OD)I
Low / Intermediate-LowERA + sGC stimulator (Macitentan + Riociguat) — if PDE5i not toleratedI
Intermediate-High / High (FC III-IV)Oral dual combination + IV Epoprostenol or IV TreprostinilI
FC IV / Very high riskTriple combination: ERA + PDE5i + IV Prostanoid from day 1I
AMBITION trial: Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg → 50% ↓ composite endpoint (death, lung transplant, hospitalization, disease worsening) vs. monotherapy. Benefit mainly from delay in first hospitalization. No increase in adverse events.

B. Patients WITH Cardiopulmonary Comorbidities (e.g., obesity, OSA, HFpEF features)

RecommendationDetails
Oral monotherapy preferredPDE5i (sildenafil or tadalafil) most commonly used first
ERA with cautionRisk of fluid retention in borderline Group 2 physiology
Avoid combination if comorbidity unclearMay worsen haemodynamics if PAWP is actually >15 mmHg

Step 3 — Sequential Escalation at Follow-Up (3-6 months)

REASSESS AT 3-6 MONTHS POST-INITIATION
(WHO FC + 6MWD + BNP/NT-proBNP + Echo + Hemodynamics)
                    ↓
         ACHIEVED LOW RISK?
         ↙                   ↘
        YES                   NO
     Continue               ESCALATE:
     same regimen           Add 3rd agent
                                  ↓
                     If on ERA + PDE5i:
                     Add SELEXIPAG (1600 µg BD max)
                     or switch to IV PROSTANOID
                                  ↓
                     If already on triple oral:
                     Switch to IV/SC prostanoid
                     (Epoprostenol IV preferred)
                                  ↓
                     STILL HIGH RISK?
                     → LUNG TRANSPLANT LISTING
                     (Bilateral or heart-lung)

Detailed Drug-by-Drug Pharmacology

PROSTANOIDS

DrugRouteDoseHalf-lifeKey TrialUnique Points
EpoprostenolIV continuousStart 1-2 ng/kg/min; uptitrate by 1-2 ng/kg/min every few weeks3-5 minBarst 1996 (NEJM)Only PAH drug with RCT mortality benefit; tachyphylaxis requires dose escalation; pump failure = life-threatening
TreprostinilIV / SC / Inhaled / OralIV: similar to epoprostenol; SC: 1.25 ng/kg/min start; Oral: 0.25 mg with meals TDS → up to 12 mg TDS; Inhaled: 4 puffs (18 mcg) 4x/day~4 hoursTRIUMPH (inhaled), FREEDOM (oral)SC causes injection site pain; oral modest benefit; inhaled approved for ILD-PH (INCREASE trial)
IloprostInhaled2.5-5 mcg/inhalation, 6-9 inhalations/day20-30 min effectAIR trialMost frequent dosing regimen — impractical; cough common
BeraprostOral40-120 mcg TDSShortALPHABET (modest)Used primarily in Asia; less evidence
Prostanoid side effects (class): Jaw pain on eating, flushing, headache, nausea, diarrhea, leg pain; IV epoprostenol — catheter sepsis risk

SELECTIVE IP RECEPTOR AGONIST

DrugDoseTrialKey Data
SelexipagStart 200 µg BD; uptitrate weekly by 200 µg increments; maximum 1600 µg BDGRIPHON (n=1156) — largest PAH RCT ever43% ↓ risk of hospitalization and disease progression vs placebo; no significant mortality benefit alone; well-tolerated; twice-daily oral dosing
Harrison's 22E: Selexipag was studied in WHO FC II-III patients on background ERA or PDE5i or both. Active metabolite has prolonged half-life vs prostanoid analogues → twice-daily dosing practical.

ENDOTHELIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS (ERAs)

DrugSelectivityDoseTrialKey DataMonitoring
BosentanDual ET-A + ET-B62.5 mg BD x 4 weeks → 125 mg BDBREATHE-1, EARLYImproved 6MWD, WHO FC, hemodynamics; delayed clinical worsening; first approved ERAMonthly LFTs (hepatotoxicity 3-11%); strong CYP3A4 inducer — many drug interactions
AmbrisentanSelective ET-A5 mg OD → 10 mg ODARIES-1/2↑ 6MWD, ↓ hospitalization; used in AMBITION trialLFTs less frequent; peripheral edema common; CYP3A4 interaction less than bosentan
MacitentanDual ET-A + ET-B (high tissue affinity)10 mg ODSERAPHIN (n=742)First PAH trial with morbidity AND mortality composite endpoint; 45% ↓ HR for composite worsening; 87-week median follow-up; majority on background therapy↓ Hemoglobin (monitor); teratogenic; less hepatotoxicity than bosentan
SERAPHIN key message: Macitentan 10 mg OD → HR 0.55 (45% risk reduction) for combined death or disease progression. Significant benefit even on background therapy. Now preferred ERA in combination regimens.
ERA class effects:
  • Teratogenic — mandatory contraception (Category X)
  • Peripheral edema (ET-B blockade → fluid retention)
  • Hepatotoxicity (bosentan > macitentan ≈ ambrisentan)
  • Drug interactions via CYP3A4 induction (bosentan most significant — reduces levels of cyclosporine, warfarin, statins, sildenafil)

PDE-5 INHIBITORS

DrugDoseHalf-lifeTrialKey Data
Sildenafil20 mg TDS (PAH approved dose; higher doses used in practice)~4 hoursSUPER-1↑ 6MWD +45 m; improved WHO FC and hemodynamics; three-times-daily dosing
Tadalafil40 mg OD~17.5 hoursPHIRST↑ 6MWD +33 m; once-daily dosing advantage; delays clinical worsening
PDE-5i side effects: Headache, flushing, epistaxis, nasal congestion, dyspepsia, visual changes (sildenafil — blue tinge, dose-related); priapism (rare)
Critical: ABSOLUTE contraindication with nitrates (synergistic hypotension). ABSOLUTE contraindication with riociguat (both increase cGMP → severe hypotension).

sGC STIMULATOR

DrugDoseMechanismTrialsIndications
Riociguat0.5 mg TDS → titrate up to 2.5 mg TDS over 8 weeksStimulates sGC directly AND sensitizes it to endogenous NO — works even in NO-deficient statesPATENT-1 (PAH): ↑ 6MWD +30 m, ↓ PVR; CHEST-1 (CTEPH): ↑ 6MWD +46 m, ↓ PVRGroup 1 PAH AND inoperable/persistent CTEPH — only drug approved for BOTH
Side effects: Hypotension (titrate slowly), dizziness, headache, dyspepsia, peripheral edema; teratogenic
Contraindications:
  • PDE-5 inhibitors (ABSOLUTE)
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe hepatic impairment
  • NOT for Group 2 PH (LEPHT/DILATE trials showed harm — ↑ adverse events, no benefit)

NOVEL AGENT — SOTATERCEPT (Harrison's 22E)

Class: Activin signal inhibitor / TGF-β ligand trap Mechanism: Fusion protein (Fc-IgG + extracellular domain of activin receptor type IIA). Blocks activin-ALK4/5/7 signalling → upregulates BMPR2 bioactivity → rebalances TGF-β/BMPR2 pathway → restores normal vascular cell growth patterns
Rationale: Addresses the underlying proliferative vascular remodeling in PAH (rather than just vasodilation). Works on a separate 4th pathway from existing three.
TrialDesignDoseKey Outcome
PULSAR (Phase 2)Placebo-controlled0.3 and 0.7 mg/kg SC q3 weeksDose-dependent ↓ PVR: -1.8 WU (0.3 mg) and -3.0 WU (0.7 mg) at week 24
STELLAR (Phase 3)Placebo-controlled; ~60% on triple therapy0.3 mg/kg → target 0.7 mg/kg SC q3 weeks↑ 6MWD +40 m vs -1.4 m placebo; improved WHO FC, ↓ NT-proBNP; ↓ time to death or PAH worsening
Key point: STELLAR enrolled patients already on triple therapy (including 40% on IV prostacyclin) — i.e., patients who would conventionally have no further medical options. Sotatercept showed significant benefit on top of maximal therapy.
Side effects: Telangiectasia development (10.4% — tracks with angioproliferative TGF-β bioactivity), dizziness, headache, injection site reactions
Exam Pearl: Sotatercept represents the 4th therapeutic pathway in PAH — the activin/BMP axis. It is the first drug with a completely novel mechanism approved in PAH in over a decade. Approved by FDA in 2024.

Summary: Approved PAH Drug Classes and Pathways

PATHWAY 1 - ENDOTHELIN            PATHWAY 2 - NO/cGMP
Bosentan    (ERA, Dual)            Sildenafil  (PDE5i)
Ambrisentan (ERA, ET-A select.)    Tadalafil   (PDE5i)
Macitentan  (ERA, Dual, tissue)    Riociguat   (sGC stimulator)*

PATHWAY 3 - PROSTACYCLIN/cAMP     PATHWAY 4 - ACTIVIN/BMP (NEW)
Epoprostenol (IV prostanoid)       Sotatercept (Activin inhibitor)
Treprostinil (IV/SC/inh/oral)
Iloprost     (Inhaled)
Selexipag    (IP receptor agonist)

*Riociguat also approved for CTEPH (inoperable/post-PEA)
CCBs: Vasoreactive patients ONLY (<5% IPAH)

GROUP 2 — LEFT HEART DISEASE (PH)

Principle: Treat the underlying left heart disease. PAH-specific drugs are not indicated.

ConditionDrug Management
HFrEF-PHACEi/ARB/ARNI + β-blocker + MRA + SGLT-2i; diuretics; device therapy (CRT, ICD, LVAD)
HFpEF-PHSGLT-2i (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin) + diuretics + MRA + weight loss; control HTN, DM, AF; invasive PA pressure monitoring (CardioMEMS) to guide diuresis
Mitral stenosisBalloon mitral valvotomy (BMV) or surgical MVR — may resolve PH
Mitral/Aortic regurgitationValve repair/replacement
CpcPH (combined, PVR >2 WU)Optimize LHD first; PAH drugs may be trialled at specialist centre only — no guideline recommendation; evidence lacking
Why NO PAH drugs in Group 2?
  • Pulmonary vasodilators → ↓ PA pressure WITHOUT reducing elevated PAWP
  • Net result: fluid redistribution → alveolar flooding → acute pulmonary edema
  • Riociguat trials (LEPHT, DILATE-1): ↑ adverse events, no benefit, potential harm in HFpEF
  • Sildenafil (RELAX trial in HFpEF): no improvement in 6MWD or outcomes
Harrison's 22E: HFpEF-PH — "The focus of care should be to optimize contemporary treatment of HFpEF including SGLT-2 therapy, mineralocorticoid therapy, diuretics, and encouraging regular exercise to promote weight loss and conditioning."

GROUP 3 — PH DUE TO LUNG DISEASE / HYPOXIA

Principle: Treat the underlying lung disease. Targeted PAH therapy only in selected severe cases.

StrategyDetails
Supplemental oxygenLTOT if PaO₂ <55 mmHg; nocturnal O₂ in OSA/OHS; target SpO₂ >92%
COPD-specificInhaled LABA + LAMA + ICS; pulmonary rehabilitation; avoid hypoxia
IPF-specificAntifibrotics: Nintedanib or Pirfenidone (slow ILD progression); may slow PH progression
OSA/OHSCPAP/NIV; ↓ hypoxic vasoconstriction
Targeted Therapy for Group 3 — Evidence Summary:
DrugEvidenceStatus
Inhaled treprostinilINCREASE trial (ILD-PH): ↑ 6MWD +21 m at 16 wks; ↓ clinical worseningFDA approved for ILD-PH (Group 3) — inhaled 4 puffs (18 mcg) 4x/day
Inhaled iloprost↑ 6MWD +33 m in ILD-PH (placebo-controlled RCT)Promising; not specifically approved for Group 3 yet
SildenafilSTEP-IPF: ↑ 6MWD and DLCO but no mortality benefit in IPF-PHOff-label; not guideline-recommended for routine use
RiociguatRISE-IIP trial (ILD-PH): STOPPED EARLY — ↑ mortality/adverse eventsCONTRAINDICATED in ILD-associated PH
Warning: Systemic vasodilators in Group 3 can worsen V/Q mismatch by increasing blood flow to poorly ventilated lung regions → worsening hypoxemia. This is why inhaled route (treprostinil, iloprost) is preferred — delivers drug preferentially to ventilated lung units.
Out-of-proportion PH in Group 3 (mPAP >35-40 mmHg despite lung disease):
  • Refer to specialist PH centre
  • Exclude concomitant PAH or CTEPH
  • Careful trial of PAH therapy with monitoring
  • Lung transplantation for advanced refractory disease

GROUP 4 — CTEPH (Chronic Thromboembolic PH)

Principle: Multimodal — Surgery + Interventions + Drugs

All CTEPH patients require LIFELONG ANTICOAGULATION regardless of intervention:
  • Warfarin (VKA): historically preferred; target INR 2-3
  • DOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban): increasingly used; validated in VTE; less data specific to CTEPH but acceptable
CTEPH CONFIRMED (RHC + V/Q + CTPA/DSA)
              ↓
MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM (Expert CTEPH Centre)
    ↙                           ↘
OPERABLE                    INOPERABLE or REFUSES
(proximal disease,          (distal/microvascular disease,
technically accessible)      high surgical risk)
    ↓                               ↓
PULMONARY                    RIOCIGUAT 2.5 mg TDS
ENDARTERECTOMY (PEA)         (Class I Recommendation)
• Median sternotomy + CPB         +
• Deep hypothermic arrest    BALLOON PULMONARY
• Curative in 70-80%         ANGIOPLASTY (BPA)
• Op mortality ~4-5%         (4-6 sessions, wires/balloons)
• Normalises PVR in most         ↓
    ↓                    Combination: Riociguat + BPA
REASSESS at 6 MONTHS     increasingly standard of care
    ↓
RESIDUAL PH POST-PEA?
    ↓
→ Riociguat (CHEST-1)
→ BPA for distal residual disease
→ Macitentan (MERIT-1 trial): modest benefit
CHEST-1 Trial (Riociguat in CTEPH):
  • 261 patients; inoperable CTEPH or persistent PH after PEA
  • Riociguat 2.5 mg TDS: ↑ 6MWD +46 m vs -6 m placebo (p<0.001)
  • ↓ PVR -226 dyn·sec·cm⁻⁵; improved WHO FC
  • Class I, Level B recommendation
BPA (Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty):
  • Multiple sessions (typically 4-6), targeting 1-2 segments per session
  • Complication: reperfusion pulmonary edema, haemoptysis, vessel injury
  • Improvements: ↓ PVR, ↑ exercise capacity, improved RV function
  • Now combined with riociguat for optimal results

GROUP 5 — MISCELLANEOUS

No approved specific PAH therapy — manage underlying condition

ConditionDrug Approach
Sarcoidosis-PHCorticosteroids (prednisone) — may ↓ PAP in granulomatous vasculitis; PAH drugs considered case-by-case at specialist centre
Sickle cell disease-PHHydroxyurea (↑ HbF, ↓ haemolysis); L-glutamine; exchange transfusion; PAH drugs not routinely validated; avoid iron overload
Myeloproliferative-PHTreat underlying haematological disease; cytoreduction (hydroxyurea, ruxolitinib)
Thyroid disease-PHTreat hypo/hyperthyroidism — may resolve PH
LAM-PHSirolimus (everolimus) — slows LAM progression; PAH therapy if significant pre-capillary PH at specialist centre

INVASIVE / PROCEDURAL OPTIONS (ALL GROUPS)

ProcedureIndicationNotes
Atrial septostomyBridge to transplant; refractory FC IVCreates right-to-left shunt → ↓ RA pressure, ↑ LV preload, ↑ CO; worsens O₂ saturation; palliative
Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA)Operable CTEPHCurative; expert centre only
Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA)Inoperable CTEPH; post-PEA residualClass I for inoperable CTEPH (2022 ESC/ERS)
Lung transplantationPAH refractory to maximal therapyBilateral lung transplant preferred; heart-lung if complex CHD; refer early; bridge with IV epoprostenol
LVADGroup 2 HFrEF-PHMay ↓ PAP by unloading LV; bridge to transplant
VA-ECMOAcute RV failure / bridge to transplantLast resort; time-limited

COMBINATION THERAPY — EVIDENCE SUMMARY

TrialDrugsPopulationKey Result
AMBITIONAmbrisentan + Tadalafil vs monotherapyTreatment-naïve, n=50050% ↓ composite clinical failure; preferred initial strategy
SERAPHINMacitentan 10 mg vs placeboBackground therapy allowed, n=74245% ↓ morbidity/mortality composite
GRIPHONSelexipag vs placeboBackground ERA±PDE5i, n=115643% ↓ hospitalization/disease progression
STELLARSotatercept + background triple therapyAlready on max PAH therapy, n=323+40 m 6MWD; ↓ mortality/morbidity composite
CHEST-1Riociguat vs placeboInoperable CTEPH, n=261+46 m 6MWD; ↓ PVR; Class I for CTEPH
INCREASEInhaled treprostinil vs placeboILD-PH, n=326+21 m 6MWD at 16 wks; ↓ clinical worsening

CONTRAINDICATIONS MATRIX

Drug CombinationReasonSeverity
PDE5i + RiociguatSynergistic cGMP elevation → severe hypotensionABSOLUTE
PDE5i + NitratesSynergistic cGMP hypotensionABSOLUTE
ERA (any) + PregnancyTeratogenic (Category X)ABSOLUTE
CCB + Non-vasoreactive PAHAcute RV failure, haemodynamic collapseABSOLUTE
PAH drugs (systemic) + Group 3 ILDWorsen V/Q mismatch, hypoxemiaCaution
Riociguat + Group 2 PH↑ adverse events, harm in HFpEF trialsCONTRAINDICATED
Bosentan + CyclosporineCYP3A4 induction dramatically ↓ cyclosporine levelsABSOLUTE
Bosentan + Glyburide↑ liver enzyme risk with combinationAvoid

MONITORING ON PAH THERAPY

ParameterFrequencyWhy
WHO FC + 6MWDEvery 3-6 monthsTreatment response
BNP/NT-proBNPEvery 3-6 monthsRisk re-stratification
Echo (TRV, TAPSE, RA area)Every 6-12 monthsRV function monitoring
LFTsMonthly (bosentan); 3-monthly (macitentan, ambrisentan)Hepatotoxicity
CBC3-monthly (macitentan)↓ Haemoglobin
RHCAt 3-6 months if not at low risk; before escalation decisionsHaemodynamic confirmation
Pregnancy testBefore starting ERA + monthlyTeratogenicity
Renal function + electrolytesRegularly (diuretics)Electrolyte monitoring
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.