PULMONARY HYPERTENSION
Comprehensive Postgraduate Notes (MD/DM/DNB Internal Medicine)
Primary Source: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22nd Edition (2025)
Supplemented: 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines (Humbert M et al., Eur Heart J 2022)
SECTION 1: DEFINITION
1.1 Historical Definition
- Pre-2018 (historical): Pulmonary hypertension was defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25 mmHg at rest, measured by right heart catheterization (RHC). This threshold was arbitrary and chosen to avoid overdiagnosis in mild disease.
- The 25 mmHg cutoff was used in clinical guidelines from 2009 and 2015 ESC/ERS editions.
1.2 Current Hemodynamic Definition (2018 WSPH / 2022 ESC-ERS)
PH = mPAP > 20 mmHg at rest, measured by right heart catheterization (RHC)
Rationale for change:
A 2009 literature review of >1100 healthy individuals established normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg. Two standard deviations above the mean = 14 + 6.6 = ~20.6 mmHg. Therefore, mPAP >20 mmHg represents the 97.5th percentile of normal and identifies a truly abnormal pulmonary pressure.
Multiple retrospective cohort studies in COPD, IPF, and scleroderma confirmed that mildly elevated mPAP of 21-24 mmHg was associated with significantly worse functional status and survival compared to normal mPAP. A systematic review of >16,000 patients showed mild PH (mPAP 19-24 mmHg) carried an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.7).
- Harrison's 22E, Chapter 294
1.3 Normal Pulmonary Circulation Values
| Parameter | Normal Value |
|---|
| mPAP | 14 ± 3.3 mmHg (upper limit ~20 mmHg) |
| Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure (PAWP/PCWP) | 8 ± 2.9 mmHg |
| Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) | 0.93 ± 0.38 Wood Units (WU) |
| Cardiac Output (CO) | 4-8 L/min |
| Cardiac Index (CI) | 2.5-4.0 L/min/m² |
Normal upper limits: mPAP ≤20 mmHg, PAWP ≤15 mmHg, PVR <2.0 WU
1.4 Complete Hemodynamic Definitions (2022 ESC/ERS + 2018 WSPH)
| Hemodynamic Category | mPAP | PAWP | PVR | Groups |
|---|
| Normal | ≤20 mmHg | ≤15 mmHg | <2 WU | - |
| Pre-capillary PH | >20 mmHg | ≤15 mmHg | ≥2 WU (ESC) / ≥3 WU (WSPH Murray&Nadel) | 1, 3, 4, 5 |
| Isolated post-capillary PH | >20 mmHg | >15 mmHg | <2 WU | 2, 5 |
| Combined pre+post-capillary PH | >20 mmHg | >15 mmHg | ≥2 WU | 2, 5 |
| Exercise PH (new 2022) | mPAP/CO slope >3 mmHg/L/min during exercise | - | - | - |
EXAM PEARL: Previous definition ≥25 mmHg changed to >20 mmHg. This "gray zone" of mPAP 21-24 mmHg with PVR 2-3 WU is clinically relevant but has NO approved therapies as of 2022.
Harrison vs ESC Note: Harrison's 22E uses PVR >2.0 WU for precapillary PH. Some sources (Murray & Nadel, older WSPH) use ≥3 WU. The 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines adopted >2 WU to align with the lower mPAP threshold.
1.5 Key Changes from Previous Guidelines
| Feature | Pre-2018 Definition | 2022 ESC/ERS Definition |
|---|
| mPAP threshold | ≥25 mmHg | >20 mmHg |
| PVR for precapillary PH | >3 WU | >2 WU |
| Exercise PH | Not recognized | Re-introduced (mPAP/CO slope >3 mmHg/L/min) |
| DPG (diastolic pressure gradient) | Used | De-emphasized in favor of PVR |
SECTION 2: EPIDEMIOLOGY
2.1 Global Prevalence and Incidence
- PH is not rare - may be as common as multiple sclerosis and more than twice as common as IPF (Murray & Nadel)
- Overall PH prevalence: 99.8 to 127.3 per 100,000 population (Canadian universal health care data, 2002-2012)
- PAH specifically (Group 1): estimated prevalence 15-50 per million persons - the rarest form
- Group 2 (Left heart disease) is the most common form of PH in community-based studies
- ~20% of PH cases are PAH; majority are Group 2 (LHD) or Group 3 (lung disease)
2.2 Age and Sex Distribution
- PH affects individuals of all ages and races
- Women more commonly affected than men - especially in PAH
- IPAH: female predominance with female:male ratio ~2-4:1
- CTD-associated PAH: predominantly female (reflects CTD demographics)
- CTEPH (Group 4): more equal sex distribution
- Age at diagnosis of IPAH: median ~50 years (registry data); older patients more often have Group 2 PH
- Trend: increasing age at diagnosis as HFpEF and sleep apnea-related PH become more prevalent
2.3 Major Etiologies
| Region | Most Common Cause of PH |
|---|
| Worldwide | Group 2 (Left heart disease - most common overall) |
| Worldwide (PAH specifically) | IPAH (~50% of PAH) |
| Worldwide (PAH) | CTD-associated PAH (~25% of PAH) |
| Developing countries | Schistosomiasis (affects >230 million; ~5% develop PAH), rheumatic heart disease |
| India | Mitral stenosis (Group 2), CTD-PAH, IPAH, CTEPH, congenital heart disease, schistosomiasis |
India-specific: Mitral stenosis from rheumatic heart disease remains a common cause of Group 2 PH. Sickle cell disease-associated PH occurs in 6-10% of patients. Schistosomiasis is a globally significant cause.
2.4 Prognosis and Survival
- Without treatment: median survival in IPAH historically ~2.8 years from diagnosis
- With modern combination therapy: 1-year survival ~82%, 3-year ~67%, 5-year ~58% (Harrison's 22E)
- CTD-PAH (especially SSc): prognosis worse than IPAH; SSc-PAH accounts for 30% of SSc deaths
- CTEPH: best prognosis if amenable to pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), which can be curative
SECTION 3: ETIOLOGY - WHO CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION
3.1 WHO/WSPH Group Classification (6th WSPH 2018 / 2022 ESC-ERS)
GROUP 1 - PULMONARY ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION (PAH)
1.1 Idiopathic PAH (IPAH)
1.1.1 Non-responders at vasoreactivity testing
1.1.2 Acute responders at vasoreactivity testing (long-term CCB responders)
1.2 Heritable PAH
- BMPR2 mutations (most common)
- ALK1, ENG (endoglin), SMAD9, CAV1, KCNK3
- EIF2AK4 (PVOD/PCH associated)
- TBX4 (pediatric PAH)
1.3 Drug/toxin-induced PAH
- Definite: aminorex, fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine, toxic rapeseed oil,
dasatinib, benfluorex
- Likely: amphetamines, interferon alpha/beta, alkylating agents
- Possible: cocaine, phenylpropanolamine, SSRIs (neonatal PH)
1.4 Associated PAH (APAH)
1.4.1 Connective tissue diseases (SSc, SLE, MCTD, RA, Sjogren's)
1.4.2 HIV infection
1.4.3 Portal hypertension / portopulmonary hypertension
1.4.4 Congenital heart disease (ASD, VSD, PDA, AVSD - Eisenmenger)
1.4.5 Schistosomiasis
1.5 PAH with long-term response to calcium channel blockers (NEW in 6th WSPH)
1.6 PAH with overt venous/capillary involvement (PVOD/PCH)
1.7 Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN)
GROUP 2 - PH DUE TO LEFT HEART DISEASE
2.1 Heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF) [most common cause of Group 2]
2.2 Heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF)
2.3 Valvular heart disease (mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis)
2.4 Congenital/acquired cardiovascular conditions causing post-capillary PH
- Congenital pulmonary veins stenosis
- Cor triatriatum
GROUP 3 - PH DUE TO LUNG DISEASES AND/OR HYPOXIA
3.1 Obstructive lung disease (COPD)
3.2 Restrictive lung disease (ILD, including UIP/IPF)
3.3 Mixed obstructive-restrictive pattern
3.4 Sleep-disordered breathing (OSA, OHS)
3.5 Alveolar hypoventilation disorders
3.6 Chronic exposure to high altitude
3.7 Developmental lung disorders
GROUP 4 - PH DUE TO PULMONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTIONS
4.1 Chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) [most common in Group 4]
4.2 Other pulmonary artery obstructions:
- Angiosarcoma, other intravascular tumors
- Arteritis without connective tissue disease
- Congenital pulmonary artery stenosis
- Parasites (hydatid cyst)
GROUP 5 - PH WITH UNCLEAR AND/OR MULTIFACTORIAL MECHANISMS
5.1 Hematological disorders:
- Chronic hemolytic anemia (sickle cell disease, thalassemia, hereditary spherocytosis)
- Myeloproliferative neoplasms
- Splenectomy
5.2 Systemic disorders:
- Sarcoidosis (granulomatous vasculitis + lymph node compression)
- Pulmonary histiocytosis (Langerhans cell)
- Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)
- Neurofibromatosis type 1
5.3 Metabolic disorders:
- Glycogen storage diseases
- Gaucher disease
- Thyroid disorders (hypo/hyperthyroidism)
5.4 Complex congenital heart disease (post-surgical, segmental PH)
5.5 Others:
- Fibrosing mediastinitis
- Tumour emboli
- Chronic renal failure with dialysis
3.2 Genetic Mutations in Heritable PAH
| Gene | Protein | Pathway | Frequency | Notes |
|---|
| BMPR2 | BMP receptor type 2 | TGF-β/BMP | ~75% of familial PAH, ~25% sporadic IPAH | Autosomal dominant; incomplete penetrance (15-20%) |
| ALK1 (ACVRL1) | Activin receptor-like kinase 1 | TGF-β | ~1-2% | HHT-associated; telangiectasias |
| ENG | Endoglin | TGF-β | Rare | HHT-associated |
| SMAD9 (SMAD8) | Signal transducer | TGF-β/BMP downstream | Rare | - |
| CAV1 | Caveolin-1 | Lipid raft signaling | Rare | Loss of function |
| KCNK3 | TASK-1 potassium channel | K+ channel | Rare | Gain of function (reduced activity) |
| EIF2AK4 | eIF2α kinase 4 | Stress response | PVOD/PCH specific | Biallelic loss-of-function; autosomal recessive |
| TBX4 | T-box transcription factor 4 | Lung development | Pediatric PAH | Small patella syndrome |
EXAM PEARL: BMPR2 mutations show incomplete penetrance - only 15-20% of carriers develop clinical PAH. Female sex increases penetrance. EIF2AK4 is the signature mutation for PVOD (pulmonary veno-occlusive disease) and PCH (pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis).
SECTION 4: PULMONARY CIRCULATION PHYSIOLOGY
4.1 Anatomy
- The pulmonary circulation receives the entire cardiac output from the right ventricle
- Pulmonary arteries: thin-walled, highly compliant, low-pressure system
- Pulmonary arteries branch in parallel with airways down to the level of terminal bronchioles
- Pulmonary arterioles (diameter 70-500 µm) are the primary site of vascular resistance
- Pulmonary capillary bed: enormous surface area (~70 m²); single-cell thickness for gas exchange
- Pulmonary veins drain into left atrium; four main veins (two from each lung)
4.2 Pulmonary Vascular Resistance
PVR (Wood Units) = (mPAP - PAWP) / CO
Where:
- mPAP = mean pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)
- PAWP = pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mmHg) [reflects LVEDP]
- CO = cardiac output (L/min)
Normal PVR: ~0.93 ± 0.38 WU (<2 WU)
To convert: 1 WU = 80 dynes·sec·cm⁻⁵
Factors increasing PVR:
- Hypoxia (hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction - main defense against V/Q mismatch)
- Thromboembolism
- Vascular remodeling (smooth muscle hypertrophy, intimal proliferation)
- Acidosis, hypercapnia
- Inflammatory mediators
Factors decreasing PVR:
- Oxygen, NO, prostacyclin
- Sildenafil, bosentan
- Lung recruitment (positive pressure breathing can paradoxically increase PVR at high volumes)
4.3 Right Ventricular - Pulmonary Artery Coupling
- RV-PA coupling = ratio of RV contractility (Ees) to arterial elastance (Ea)
- Normal Ees/Ea ratio ≥ 1.5-2.0 (RV is an efficient pump at normal afterload)
- In PAH: progressive ↑ PVR → ↑ RV afterload → RV compensates by hypertrophy (adapted state)
- When Ees/Ea falls <0.8, the RV is uncoupled from the PA - maladaptive remodeling
- Uncoupling manifests as RV dilatation, decreased RV EF, systemic venous congestion
- TAPSE/sPAP ratio (echocardiographic surrogate of RV-PA coupling): >0.32 mm/mmHg = favorable; <0.19 mm/mmHg = high risk (2022 ESC/ERS risk stratification)
4.4 Pulmonary Vascular Compliance
PVC = Stroke Volume / Pulse Pressure of PA
- Reflects the capacitance (elastic recoil) of the pulmonary vasculature
- Reduced PVC is an early marker of pulmonary vascular disease
- Inversely related to PVR: as PVR rises, PVC falls
- Low PVC increases RV pulsatile load (additional to resistive load)
- PVC × PVR product is ~remarkably constant (~0.5 mL/mmHg × WU) across disease states
SECTION 5: PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
5.1 Overview - Three Core Molecular Pathways Targeted by Therapy
NORMAL ENDOTHELIUM
|
INJURY/TRIGGER
(genetic, immune, hypoxic, toxic)
|
ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION
|
Three Imbalanced Pathways:
[1] ↓ NO production/↑ PDE5 [2] ↓ Prostacyclin/↑ TXA2 [3] ↑ Endothelin-1
(vasoconstriction) (vasoconstriction + (vasoconstriction +
thrombosis) proliferation)
|
PULMONARY VASCULAR REMODELING
(SMC proliferation, intimal fibrosis,
adventitial thickening, neomuscularization)
|
PROGRESSIVE ↑ PVR → ↑ mPAP
|
RV PRESSURE OVERLOAD
/ \
ADAPTIVE (early) MALADAPTIVE (late)
(RV hypertrophy) (RV dilatation, failure)
5.2 Nitric Oxide (NO) Pathway
- Endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) produces NO from L-arginine
- NO activates soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) → ↑ cGMP → smooth muscle relaxation + anti-proliferative
- In PAH:
- ↓ eNOS expression/activity
- ↑ PDE5 activity (breaks down cGMP)
- ↑ Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) - endogenous NOS inhibitor
- Net result: ↓ cGMP → vasoconstriction + SMC proliferation
Therapeutic targets:
- PDE-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil): ↑ cGMP by blocking its degradation
- sGC stimulators (riociguat): directly stimulate sGC, even in low/absent NO states
5.3 Prostacyclin Pathway
- Prostacyclin (PGI₂) produced by endothelial cells from arachidonic acid via cyclooxygenase
- Activates adenylate cyclase → ↑ cAMP → smooth muscle relaxation + vasodilation
- Also: anti-aggregatory (↓ platelet aggregation), anti-proliferative
- Thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂) is the opposing vasoconstrictor + pro-aggregatory
- In PAH:
- ↓ prostacyclin synthase expression (↓ PGI₂)
- ↑ TXA₂ production
- Net: vasoconstriction + platelet activation + in situ thrombosis
Therapeutic targets:
- Prostacyclin analogues: epoprostenol (IV), treprostinil (IV/SC/inhaled/oral), iloprost (inhaled), beraprost (oral, Asia)
- IP receptor agonists: selexipag (oral, selective IP receptor)
5.4 Endothelin Pathway
- Endothelin-1 (ET-1): most potent endogenous vasoconstrictor produced by endothelial cells
- Acts via two receptors:
- ET-A receptors (smooth muscle): mediate vasoconstriction + proliferation
- ET-B receptors (endothelium): mediate vasodilation (via NO/PGI₂), clearance of ET-1
- In PAH:
- ↑ ET-1 production by dysfunctional endothelium
- ↑ ET-A:ET-B ratio on smooth muscle
- Net: vasoconstriction + SMC proliferation + fibrosis
Therapeutic targets:
- Dual ERA (ET-A + ET-B blockade): bosentan, macitentan
- Selective ET-A antagonist: ambrisentan (theoretically preserves ET-B mediated vasodilation)
5.5 Vascular Remodeling
Histopathological changes in PAH (precapillary arterioles <500 µm):
- Intimal proliferation: myofibroblast/smooth muscle-like cell migration + fibrous intimal hyperplasia → narrowed lumen
- Medial hypertrophy: smooth muscle cell (SMC) hypertrophy + hyperplasia → increased media thickness
- Adventitial thickening: fibroblast proliferation + excess collagen deposition
- Neomuscularization of normally non-muscular arterioles
- Plexiform lesions (pathognomonic of PAH and CTEPH): disordered, angioproliferative lesions forming distal to obstructed arterioles
5.6 Plexiform Lesions
- Pathognomonic of advanced PAH (Group 1) and CTEPH
- Located at bifurcations of pulmonary arterioles
- Composed of: channels lined by disorganized endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, myofibroblasts, and inflammatory cells
- Mechanism: endothelial cells become monoclonal and apoptosis-resistant ("pseudo-neoplastic" phenotype)
- BMPR2 dysfunction leads to unchecked cell proliferation
- Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition (End-MT) contributes to fibrotic and plexigenic remodeling
Harrison's 22E: "Plexigenic and fibrotic remodeling of pulmonary arterioles impairs pulmonary arterial compliance and results in a progressive increase in total PVR."
5.7 In Situ Thrombosis
- Due to: ↓ prostacyclin, ↓ thrombomodulin, ↓ fibrinolysis, activated platelets, and vascular stasis
- Microthrombi in small pulmonary arterioles (distinct from macrovascular thromboemboli in CTEPH)
- Contributes to progressive vascular occlusion
- Historically justified anticoagulation in IPAH (now debated - see treatment section)
5.8 Inflammation
- Inflammatory cells (T cells, B cells, macrophages, mast cells) infiltrate pulmonary vascular adventitia
- Elevated IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, CXCL12 in PAH
- Regulatory T-cell dysfunction: loss of immune tolerance allowing autoimmune vascular injury
- Relevant in CTD-PAH, HIV-PAH
- JAK2 overactivation in PAH - ruxolitinib (JAK2 inhibitor) is an emerging therapeutic
5.9 Right Ventricular Adaptation and Failure
Stage 1 - Adaptive (Compensated):
- Concentric RV hypertrophy (↑ wall thickness, preserved cavity size)
- ↑ RV systolic pressure matches ↑ pulmonary load
- Normal/near-normal CO
- RV-PA coupling maintained (Ees/Ea ≥ 1.5)
- Metabolic shift: fatty acid oxidation to glycolysis (Warburg-like)
Stage 2 - Maladaptive (Decompensated):
- RV dilatation (cavity enlargement, wall thinning - "volume overload pattern")
- ↑ RV wall stress → subendocardial ischemia (RV O₂ supply-demand mismatch)
- Septal flattening → D-shaped LV → ↓ LV preload → ↓ CO
- Tricuspid regurgitation (functional, due to annular dilatation)
- Elevated RAP → systemic venous hypertension, hepatic congestion, ascites, edema
- RV-PA uncoupling: TAPSE/sPAP < 0.19 mm/mmHg
RV Failure Cascade:
↑ PVR → ↑ RV Afterload
↓
RV Pressure Overload
↓
RV Hypertrophy (adaptive)
↓
RV Dilatation (maladaptive)
↓
Septal shift left → ↓ LV filling
↓
↓ Cardiac Output
↓
Systemic hypoperfusion + venous congestion
↓
Multi-organ dysfunction (liver, kidneys)
↓
DEATH
SECTION 6: HEMODYNAMIC CLASSIFICATION
6.1 Complete Hemodynamic Classification Table
| Category | mPAP | PAWP | PVR | DPG | Clinical Examples |
|---|
| Pre-capillary PH | >20 mmHg | ≤15 mmHg | >2 WU | - | IPAH, CTD-PAH, CTEPH, Group 3 PH |
| Isolated post-capillary PH (IpcPH) | >20 mmHg | >15 mmHg | ≤2 WU | <7 mmHg | HFpEF, mitral stenosis, HFrEF |
| Combined pre+post-capillary PH (CpcPH) | >20 mmHg | >15 mmHg | >2 WU | ≥7 mmHg | Advanced LHD with reactive PH, severe MR/MS with vascular remodeling |
Diastolic Pressure Gradient (DPG) = Diastolic PA pressure - mean PAWP (normal <5 mmHg)
- DPG ≥7 mmHg suggests pre-capillary component in a post-capillary background
- Less affected by volume status compared to TPG (transpulmonary gradient)
Transpulmonary Gradient (TPG) = mPAP - mean PAWP (normal <12 mmHg)
- TPG >12 mmHg = raised; but affected by high flow states
EXAM PEARL: In a patient with heart failure, diuresis before RHC may artificially lower PAWP, making isolated post-capillary PH appear as pre-capillary PH ("Group 2 masquerading as Group 1"). Always assess clinical context and volume status.
SECTION 7: WHO CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION - DETAILED
7.1 Group 1 - Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Characteristic hemodynamics:
- mPAP >20 mmHg, PAWP ≤15 mmHg, PVR >2 WU (pre-capillary)
- Normal or reduced CO (in advanced disease)
Characteristic pathology:
- Medial hypertrophy, intimal proliferation, adventitial fibrosis
- Plexiform lesions (most advanced)
- Thrombotic lesions in small arterioles
Key investigations:
- RHC: pre-capillary hemodynamics
- Echo: elevated RVSP, RV enlargement, D-shaped septum
- PFTs: mild restrictive pattern, low DLCO (especially PVOD/PCH)
- HRCT: normal parenchyma in IPAH; ground glass + septal lines in PVOD/PCH
- ANA, anti-Scl-70, anti-dsDNA (CTD screen)
- HIV, LFTs (portal hypertension screen)
7.2 Group 2 - PH Due to Left Heart Disease
Most common form of PH overall
Characteristic hemodynamics:
- mPAP >20 mmHg, PAWP >15 mmHg (post-capillary)
- ↑ LVEDP
Pathology:
- Venous congestion, medial hypertrophy of small pulmonary veins
- In CpcPH: additional arteriolar remodeling
Key investigations:
- Echo: LV systolic/diastolic dysfunction, valvular disease, LA enlargement
- Coronary angiography (if ischemic cardiomyopathy suspected)
- RHC: confirms elevated PAWP; rules out PAH
7.3 Group 3 - PH Due to Lung Disease/Hypoxia
Mechanism: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction + structural vascular changes (vascular bed destruction in emphysema, perivascular fibrosis in ILD)
Characteristic hemodynamics:
- Usually mild PH (mPAP 25-35 mmHg); if mPAP >35 mmHg in COPD/ILD, suspect concomitant PAH or CTEPH
Key investigations:
- PFTs: obstructive (COPD) or restrictive (ILD) pattern
- HRCT: emphysema, bronchiectasis, interstitial fibrosis
- ABG: hypoxemia, hypercapnia
- V/Q scan: patchy matched defects (vs. segmental mismatch in CTEPH)
7.4 Group 4 - CTEPH
Mechanism: Incomplete resolution of PE → organized thrombus → mechanical obstruction + vascular remodeling
Characteristic hemodynamics:
- Pre-capillary PH
- Significant increase in PVR (often severe: >5-10 WU)
- May have severely impaired CO
Pathology:
- Organized intraluminal thrombus (not fresh clot - chronic, fibrotic)
- Intimal webs, pouches, bands in pulmonary arteries
- Microvascular disease in patent vessels (small vessel remodeling - secondary PH component)
Key investigations:
- V/Q scan: BEST screening test - segmental perfusion defects without matched ventilation defects
- CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA): webs, pouches, mural thrombus, mosaic perfusion
- Digital subtraction angiography (DSA): gold standard for surgical planning
- RHC: pre-capillary hemodynamics with high PVR
7.5 Group 5 - Miscellaneous/Multifactorial
- Sarcoidosis: multiple mechanisms (granulomatous vasculitis, lymphadenopathy compression, hypoxia, LV dysfunction)
- Sickle cell disease: hemolysis (↓ NO via free Hb scavenging), thromboembolism, hypoxia; 6-10% prevalence in SCD
- Myeloproliferative disorders: ↑ viscosity, ↑ thrombotic risk
- Thyroid disease: both hypo and hyperthyroidism can cause PH
SECTION 8: CLINICAL FEATURES
8.1 Symptoms (in order of progression)
| Stage | Common Symptoms |
|---|
| Early (WHO FC I-II) | Exertional dyspnea (most common, earliest symptom), fatigue, reduced exercise tolerance |
| Intermediate (WHO FC II-III) | Dyspnea at lesser exertion, chest pain (angina-type from RV ischemia), pre-syncope on exertion |
| Advanced (WHO FC III-IV) | Syncope (RV unable to augment CO with exertion), orthopnea, PND, abdominal distension (ascites), leg edema, hemoptysis |
Symptoms of specific groups:
- Raynaud's phenomenon, skin thickening, sicca symptoms → CTD-PAH
- Chronic cough, sputum → COPD/ILD-related PH (Group 3)
- History of DVT/PE → CTEPH (Group 4)
- Cirrhosis → portopulmonary PH
8.2 Physical Examination
Cardiovascular signs:
- Loud P2 (pulmonic component of S2): most consistent sign of PH; heard best at left upper sternal border
- Right ventricular heave (left parasternal heave): sustained, palpable
- Murmur of tricuspid regurgitation: holosystolic at LLSB; ↑ with inspiration (Carvallo's sign)
- Pulmonic regurgitation murmur (Graham Steell murmur): early diastolic at LUSB
- Right-sided S3/S4: gallop rhythm
Signs of RV failure:
- Elevated JVP with prominent a and v waves
- Hepatomegaly (pulsatile if TR present)
- Ascites (in advanced disease)
- Peripheral edema (dependent, bilateral)
- Cyanosis: due to ↓ CO, right-to-left shunting through PFO
- Clubbing: suggests congenital heart disease (Eisenmenger) or pulmonary venocclusive disease
Signs pointing to specific etiology:
- Telangiectasias, sclerodactyly → SSc-PAH
- Oral ulcers, malar rash → SLE-PAH
- Spider angiomas, splenomegaly → portopulmonary PH
- Kyphoscoliosis → Group 3 PH
8.3 WHO Functional Classification
| Class | Definition | Clinical Analog |
|---|
| FC I | No limitation; ordinary activity does not cause symptoms | Asymptomatic despite PH |
| FC II | Slight limitation; comfortable at rest; ordinary activity causes dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain, or near-syncope | NYHA Class II |
| FC III | Marked limitation; comfortable at rest; less than ordinary activity causes symptoms | NYHA Class III |
| FC IV | Inability to carry out any activity; symptoms at rest; signs of right heart failure | NYHA Class IV |
EXAM PEARL: WHO FC is a key prognostic variable AND determines initial therapy intensity. FC III-IV at presentation → initiate triple combination therapy including parenterals (per 2022 ESC/ERS).
8.4 Red Flag Features (Rapid Referral Triggers per 2022 ESC/ERS)
- Rapid progression of symptoms
- Severely reduced exercise capacity (6MWD <165 m)
- Pre-syncope or syncope on mild exertion
- Signs of right heart failure (edema, ascites)
- mPAP >50 mmHg on echo estimate
- CT evidence of RV dilation + septal bowing
SECTION 9: DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH
9.1 Stepwise Diagnostic Algorithm (2022 ESC/ERS Three-Step Approach)
STEP 1: SUSPICION (Primary Care / General Physician)
Clinical evaluation:
- Unexplained exertional dyspnea
- Known associated condition (CTD, CHD, portal HTN, HIV, PE history)
- Risk factors for PAH or CTEPH
Initial tests:
- ECG, O₂ saturation (pulse oximetry)
- CXR
- Basic blood work (CBC, LFTs, TFTs, ANA)
↓
STEP 2: DETECTION (Echocardiography + Further Testing)
Echocardiogram - KEY SCREENING TOOL:
- TRV > 2.8 m/s → LOW probability PH
- TRV 2.9-3.4 m/s + other signs → INTERMEDIATE probability
- TRV > 3.4 m/s OR TRV 2.9-3.4 + other signs → HIGH probability
Supporting tests:
- PFTs + DLCO
- ABG
- HRCT chest
- V/Q scan
- Sleep study if suspected OSA
↓
STEP 3: CONFIRMATION (PH Center - Specialist)
Right Heart Catheterization (RHC) - GOLD STANDARD
- Confirms hemodynamic diagnosis
- Rules in/out precapillary vs postcapillary PH
- Vasoreactivity testing if indicated
Additional:
- CTPA (CTEPH)
- Pulmonary angiography (surgical planning)
- Cardiac MRI
- Genetic testing (BMPR2 etc.)
- Connective tissue disease work-up
- HIV, hepatitis serology
- BNP/NT-proBNP (baseline + monitoring)
9.2 ECG Findings
| Feature | Significance |
|---|
| Right axis deviation (>+100°) | Suggests RVH |
| Right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) | R:S > 1 in V1; S > R in I, aVL, V5-V6 |
| Right bundle branch block (RBBB) | RV conduction delay |
| P pulmonale (P >2.5 mm in II) | RAH (right atrial hypertrophy) |
| ST-T changes V1-V4 | RV strain pattern |
| Sinus tachycardia | Low CO state, sympathetic activation |
ECG has poor sensitivity for early PH but suggests severity in established disease. Normal ECG does not exclude PH.
9.3 Chest X-Ray Findings
| Feature | Significance |
|---|
| Enlarged main pulmonary artery (>2.9 cm) | PH (sensitivity ~40%) |
| Peripheral pruning (oligemia) | Reduced flow in peripheral vessels |
| Right heart enlargement (RA, RV) | Cardiomegaly from RV/RA dilation |
| Clear lung fields | IPAH (vs Group 3 with parenchymal disease) |
| Interstitial opacities + Kerley B lines | Group 2 PH (pulmonary venous HTN) |
| Unilateral oligemia (Westermark sign) | CTEPH (massive unilateral disease) |
9.4 Echocardiography
Most important non-invasive screening tool
Probability of PH based on peak TRV (tricuspid regurgitation velocity):
| TRV | Additional Echo Signs | PH Probability |
|---|
| ≤2.8 m/s | Absent | Low |
| ≤2.8 m/s | Present | Intermediate |
| 2.9-3.4 m/s | Absent | Intermediate |
| 2.9-3.4 m/s | Present | High |
| >3.4 m/s | Any | High |
Additional echocardiographic signs (2022 ESC/ERS - A, B, C categories):
- A (right ventricle): RVOT AcT <105 ms, mid-systolic notching
- B (pulmonary artery): Estimated PA systolic pressure >35 mmHg, PAWP >15 mmHg (IVRT-based)
- C (right heart): RA area >18 cm², RA/LA ratio >1, RV/LV ratio >1.0, IVC dilation >21 mm (no inspiratory collapse)
- Pericardial effusion (reflects severe PH + right heart failure)
RV function markers:
- TAPSE (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion): <18 mm = RV dysfunction
- S' wave (TDI at TV annulus): <9.5 cm/s = RV dysfunction
- FAC (fractional area change): <35% = RV systolic dysfunction
- TAPSE/sPAP ratio <0.19 mm/mmHg = high risk (RV-PA uncoupling)
9.5 Pulmonary Function Tests
- Spirometry: usually normal in IPAH; obstructive in COPD, restrictive in ILD
- DLCO (diffusing capacity): most important PFT in PAH
- Mild reduction (60-80% predicted) common in IPAH
- Severely reduced DLCO (<40-50%) → suspect CTD-PAH, PVOD/PCH, or ILD
- Low DLCO in SSc even without ILD → suggests PAH
- Lung volumes: mild restrictive pattern can occur in PAH without parenchymal disease
- Serial PFTs (every 3-6 months) indicated in high-risk SSc patients for ILD monitoring
9.6 HRCT Chest
| HRCT Finding | Significance |
|---|
| Enlarged main PA (>29 mm; or PA:aorta ratio >1) | PH |
| Mosaic attenuation (patchy ground glass) | CTEPH (air-trapping from reduced flow) |
| Ground glass opacity + interlobular septal thickening | PVOD/PCH (Group 1.6) |
| Peripheral + subpleural bronchiectasis, honeycombing | UIP/IPF → Group 3 |
| Mediastinal lymphadenopathy + granulomas | Sarcoidosis → Group 5 |
PVOD/PCH on HRCT: bilateral ground glass + septal lines + mediastinal lymphadenopathy + pleural effusions. These patients develop severe pulmonary edema with vasodilators - must not be given prostanoids/ERAs aggressively.
9.7 CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)
For CTEPH diagnosis:
- Webs, bands, pouches, complete occlusions
- Mosaic perfusion pattern
- Bronchial artery collaterals
- Sensitivity ~70%, specificity ~90% for CTEPH
- Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) = gold standard for surgical planning
9.8 V/Q Scan
| Condition | V/Q Pattern |
|---|
| CTEPH | Segmental perfusion defects (unmatched) - highly sensitive (~97%) for CTEPH |
| PAH (Group 1) | Normal or patchy non-segmental perfusion defects |
| COPD | Matched V/Q abnormalities |
| Acute PE | Classic "reverse bat-wing"; may be indistinguishable from CTEPH acutely |
KEY: V/Q scan is PREFERRED over CTPA for CTEPH screening (higher sensitivity for segmental perfusion defects). 2022 ESC/ERS: V/Q scan should be done in ALL patients with unexplained PH to exclude CTEPH.
9.9 Cardiac MRI
- Gold standard for RV volumes and function
- Can detect pericardial effusion, myocardial fibrosis (LGE)
- Not widely available; used in specialist centers
- MRI-derived RVEF, RVESVI, SVI are key prognostic markers (2022 ESC/ERS risk stratification):
- RVEF >54% → low risk
- RVEF 37-54% → intermediate risk
- RVEF <37% → high risk
9.10 Right Heart Catheterization (RHC)
GOLD STANDARD for diagnosis of PH
Measurements obtained:
- Right atrial pressure (RAP)
- Right ventricular pressure (RVP - systolic and diastolic)
- Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP - systolic, diastolic, mean)
- Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) - reflects LVEDP
- Cardiac output (CO) by thermodilution or Fick method
- Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR = [mPAP-PAWP]/CO)
- Mixed venous O₂ saturation (SvO₂)
- Cardiac index (CI)
- Stroke volume index (SVI)
RHC Interpretation:
| Parameter | Normal | Precapillary PH | Postcapillary PH | CpcPH |
|---|
| mPAP | ≤20 | >20 | >20 | >20 |
| PAWP | ≤15 | ≤15 | >15 | >15 |
| PVR (WU) | <2 | >2 | ≤2 | >2 |
| RAP | <8 | ↑ in advanced | ↑ in advanced | ↑ |
| CO | Normal | ↓ in advanced | ↓ in advanced | ↓ |
| SvO₂ | >65% | ↓ in advanced | ↓ in advanced | ↓ |
9.11 Vasoreactivity Testing
Indications: Only in IPAH and heritable PAH (not CTD-PAH, CTEPH, or other associated PAH)
Agents:
- Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) 10-20 ppm - preferred
- Inhaled epoprostenol (iloprost)
- IV adenosine (5% NaOH NOT used anymore)
- NOT oral/IV CCBs for testing - too unpredictable
Positive vasoreactivity test (Sitbon criteria):
- ↓ mPAP by ≥10 mmHg
- Absolute mPAP ≤40 mmHg
- Without decrease in cardiac output
Clinical significance:
- Only <5% of IPAH patients are vasoreactive
- Vasoreactive patients → long-term CCBs (nifedipine, diltiazem, amlodipine) → excellent prognosis
- Diltiazem preferred if heart rate is high; nifedipine or amlodipine if heart rate normal/low
- If CCBs fail after 3-6 months → re-evaluate, consider PAH-specific therapy
SECTION 10: BIOMARKERS AND BLOOD INVESTIGATIONS
10.1 Key Blood Tests
| Investigation | Rationale |
|---|
| CBC | Polycythemia (Group 3/altitude), anemia (sickle cell, iron deficiency), thrombocytopenia |
| LFTs + coagulation | Portal hypertension screen (portopulmonary PH) |
| TFTs | Thyroid disease (Group 5) |
| ANA, anti-dsDNA | SLE |
| Anti-Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I) | SSc |
| Anti-centromere antibody | Limited SSc (CREST) - high PAH risk |
| Anti-U1-RNP | MCTD |
| Anti-CCP, RF | RA-PAH |
| HIV serology | HIV-PAH |
| Hepatitis B/C serology | Cirrhosis-portopulmonary PH |
| Echo bubble contrast | PFO detection (right-to-left shunting) |
| D-dimer | Screening for CTEPH if PE history |
| Antiphospholipid antibodies | CTEPH risk factor |
10.2 Biomarkers
| Biomarker | Significance | Thresholds (2022 ESC/ERS Risk) |
|---|
| BNP | RV wall stress marker; correlates with RVSP, prognosis | Low: <50 pg/mL; Intermediate: 50-200 pg/mL; High: >200 pg/mL |
| NT-proBNP | More stable than BNP; longer half-life | Low: <300 ng/L; Intermediate: 300-1400 ng/L; High: >1400 ng/L |
| Uric acid | Impaired purine metabolism in low-flow states; prognostic marker | Elevated = worse prognosis |
| Troponin I/T | RV myocardial injury | Elevation = poor prognosis |
| GDF-15 | Growth differentiation factor; cardiac stress | Emerging biomarker |
SECTION 11: RISK STRATIFICATION
11.1 ESC/ERS 2022 Risk Model
The 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines use a 3-strata risk model (Low / Intermediate / High) with multiple variables:
| Variable | Low Risk | Intermediate Risk | High Risk |
|---|
| Clinical | No syncope | - | Syncope |
| WHO FC | I-II | III | IV |
| 6MWD | >440 m | 165-440 m | <165 m |
| BNP | <50 pg/mL | 50-200 pg/mL | >200 pg/mL |
| NT-proBNP | <300 ng/L | 300-1400 ng/L | >1400 ng/L |
| Echo: RA area | <18 cm² | 18-26 cm² | >26 cm² |
| Echo: Pericardial effusion | Absent | Minimal | Moderate-large |
| Echo: TAPSE/sPAP | >0.32 mm/mmHg | 0.19-0.32 | <0.19 |
| cMRI: RVEF | >54% | 37-54% | <37% |
| cMRI: SVI | >40 mL/m² | 26-40 mL/m² | <26 mL/m² |
| Hemodynamics: RAP | <8 mmHg | 8-14 mmHg | >14 mmHg |
| Hemodynamics: CI | ≥2.5 L/min/m² | 2.0-2.4 L/min/m² | <2.0 L/min/m² |
| Hemodynamics: SVI | >38 mL/m² | 31-38 mL/m² | <31 mL/m² |
| Hemodynamics: SvO₂ | >65% | 60-65% | <60% |
Risk category assignment:
- Low risk: majority of variables in low-risk column
- Intermediate-low (IL): 3 low + 1 high = IL, or ≥3 low + others intermediate
- Intermediate-high (IH): 2+ high-risk variables, majority intermediate/high
- High risk: majority high-risk, especially CI <2.0, RAP >14, FC IV
2022 ESC/ERS Update: Introduced Intermediate-Low (IL) and Intermediate-High (IH) sub-categories for better treatment stratification at follow-up.
11.2 REVEAL Registry Score (U.S.-Based Validation Tool)
| Parameter | Points |
|---|
| PAH subtype (APAH-CTD) | +1 |
| Renal insufficiency | +1 |
| Male age >60 years | +2 |
| Pericardial effusion on echo | +1 |
| DLCO <32% predicted | +1 |
| 6MWD <165 m | +1 |
| BNP >180 pg/mL | +1 |
| HR >92/min at rest | +1 |
| Systolic BP <110 mmHg | +1 |
| Antihypertensive med use | +1 |
Scoring interpretation:
- ≤6: Low risk (estimated 1-year survival >95%)
- 7: Average risk (~91%)
- 8: Moderately high (~77%)
- ≥9: High risk (<65%)
SECTION 12: TREATMENT - GENERAL MEASURES AND SUPPORTIVE THERAPY
12.1 General Measures
Activity:
- Exercise rehabilitation is recommended (supervised exercise training in stable patients)
- Avoid strenuous exercise to exhaustion (risk of syncope/sudden death)
- Cardiac rehabilitation - Class I recommendation in 2022 ESC/ERS
Altitude/Air travel:
- Avoid high-altitude areas (>1500-2000 m) without supplemental O₂
- In-flight supplemental O₂ during air travel if resting SpO₂ <92% or during exertion
Infection prevention:
- Pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations recommended
- COVID-19 vaccination (no data suggesting increased PH risk from vaccines)
12.2 Oxygen
- Indication: Maintain SpO₂ >92% at rest (>95% optimal)
- Group 3 (COPD, ILD): long-term O₂ therapy (LTOT) per standard criteria (PaO₂ <55 mmHg)
- Group 1 PAH: O₂ indicated for hypoxemia to prevent secondary vasoconstriction
- Nocturnal O₂: especially important in sleep-disordered breathing-related PH
12.3 Diuretics
- Indication: Volume overload, RV failure (peripheral edema, ascites, hepatic congestion)
- Agents: Loop diuretics (furosemide, torasemide); aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone)
- Avoid over-diuresis - reduces RV preload → ↓ CO (RV is preload-dependent)
- Monitor electrolytes (hypokalemia, hyponatremia)
12.4 Digoxin
- Limited role in PAH
- May be used for rate control in atrial fibrillation/flutter (common arrhythmias in advanced PH)
- Historical use: modest improvement in RV contractility and CO (short-term data only)
- No survival benefit demonstrated
12.5 Anticoagulation
This is a controversial area with evolving recommendations:
| Situation | Recommendation |
|---|
| CTEPH (Group 4) | Lifelong anticoagulation - Class I; all patients even post-PEA |
| IPAH/Heritable PAH | Previously Class IIa (warfarin); now NOT routinely recommended in 2022 ESC/ERS due to lack of survival benefit and bleeding risk |
| APAH-CTD (SSc) | Generally avoided (bleeding risk, no benefit) |
| Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome | Warfarin or DOAC guided by thrombophilia management |
2022 ESC/ERS Update: Anticoagulation in IPAH downgraded - now "may be considered" (Class IIb) rather than recommended. DOACs not validated in PAH.
12.6 Iron Supplementation
- Iron deficiency (with or without anemia) is common in PAH (seen in ~40%)
- Iron deficiency independently worsens exercise capacity and prognosis
- IV iron supplementation improves 6MWD and quality of life in iron-deficient PAH patients
- Oral iron often poorly absorbed - IV preferred
12.7 Pregnancy
- Pregnancy is CONTRAINDICATED in PAH - maternal mortality ~30-50% historically
- Risk from: 30-50% increase in CO during pregnancy, systemic vasodilation, delivery-related hemodynamic shifts, postpartum RV failure
- 2022 ESC/ERS: Pregnancy is strongly discouraged (Class III - Harm)
- Effective contraception essential: progesterone-only pill, IUD, or sterilization
- Avoid: estrogen-containing OCP (↑ VTE risk, pulmonary vasoconstriction)
- If pregnancy occurs: multidisciplinary care at expert center; IV epoprostenol + mode of delivery discussion
SECTION 13: PAH-SPECIFIC PHARMACOTHERAPY
13.1 Overview of Approved Drug Classes
THREE THERAPEUTIC PATHWAYS:
1. ENDOTHELIN PATHWAY 2. NO-cGMP PATHWAY 3. PROSTACYCLIN PATHWAY
(↓ vasoconstriction, (↑ vasodilation) (↑ vasodilation,
↓ proliferation) ↓ platelet aggregation)
↓ ↓ ↓
ENDOTHELIN RECEPTOR PDE-5 INHIBITORS PROSTACYCLIN ANALOGUES
ANTAGONISTS (ERAs): + sGC STIMULATORS + IP RECEPTOR AGONISTS
Bosentan, Ambrisentan,
Macitentan Sildenafil, Tadalafil Epoprostenol (IV)
+ Riociguat Treprostinil (IV/SC/inh/oral)
Iloprost (inhaled)
Beraprost (oral, Asia)
Selexipag (oral IP agonist)
13.2 Endothelin Receptor Antagonists (ERAs)
| Drug | Receptor Selectivity | Dose | Key Features |
|---|
| Bosentan | Dual (ET-A + ET-B) | 62.5 mg → 125 mg BD | First approved ERA; LFT monitoring required monthly; teratogenic |
| Ambrisentan | Selective ET-A | 5 mg OD → 10 mg OD | Less hepatotoxic; peripheral edema common |
| Macitentan | Dual (ET-A + ET-B, tissue-penetrant) | 10 mg OD | SERAPHIN trial - reduced morbidity/mortality; ↓ hemoglobin (monitor) |
Class effects and side effects:
- Peripheral edema (ET-B blockade → fluid retention)
- Hepatotoxicity (monitor LFTs monthly - especially bosentan)
- Teratogenicity (Category X - mandatory contraception)
- Drug interactions: CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors (especially bosentan - induces CYP3A4 reducing cyclosporine, warfarin, statin levels)
- Anemia (macitentan - dose-dependent)
13.3 PDE-5 Inhibitors
| Drug | Dose | Half-Life | Notes |
|---|
| Sildenafil | 20 mg TDS (PO) | ~4 hours | SUPER-1 trial - improved 6MWD +45 m; approved for PAH |
| Tadalafil | 40 mg OD | ~17.5 hours | Once-daily dosing advantage; PHIRST trial |
| Vardenafil | Off-label use in PAH | - | - |
Mechanism: Block PDE-5 → ↑ cGMP → smooth muscle relaxation + anti-proliferative
Side effects: Headache, flushing, epistaxis, visual changes, priapism (rare), hypotension (especially with nitrates - ABSOLUTE CONTRAINDICATION to combine with nitrates)
CRITICAL: PDE-5 inhibitors + riociguat = CONTRAINDICATED (synergistic hypotension)
13.4 Soluble Guanylate Cyclase (sGC) Stimulator
| Drug | Dose | Unique Feature |
|---|
| Riociguat | 0.5-2.5 mg TDS (titrate) | Works in NO-INDEPENDENT manner; CHEST-1 trial (CTEPH), PATENT-1 trial (PAH) |
Indications:
- PAH (Group 1) - PATENT-1: ↑ 6MWD +30 m
- CTEPH (inoperable or persistent post-PEA) - CHEST-1: ↑ 6MWD +46 m
- NOT approved for Group 2 (left heart disease) - DILATE-1/LEPHT showed harm (↓ BP, no benefit)
Contraindications: Concomitant PDE-5 inhibitors, pregnancy (teratogenic), severe hepatic impairment, hypotension
13.5 Prostacyclin Analogues
| Drug | Route | Half-Life | Notes |
|---|
| Epoprostenol (prostacyclin, PGI₂) | IV continuous infusion | 3-5 minutes | First approved prostanoid; life-saving in severe PAH; pump device required; ↑ dose over time (tachyphylaxis); ONLY drug proven to improve survival in a RCT |
| Treprostinil | IV, SC, inhaled, oral | ~4 hours | SC causes injection site pain; oral: modest benefit; inhaled 4-9 puffs 4x/day |
| Iloprost | Inhaled | ~20-30 min inhalation effect | 6-9 inhalations/day; impractical |
| Beraprost | Oral | 35-40 min | Only oral; used mainly in Asia; modest efficacy |
EXAM PEARL: Epoprostenol (IV continuous) is the ONLY PAH drug with proven mortality benefit in an RCT (Barst RJ, 1996 NEJM). It remains the treatment of choice for WHO FC IV patients and acutely decompensated PAH.
Common side effects of prostanoids:
- Jaw pain (on eating), flushing, headache, nausea, diarrhea, skin flushing
- Leg pain (treprostinil SC)
- Risk of line sepsis and pump failure with IV routes (potentially fatal)
13.6 IP Receptor Agonist (Prostacyclin Receptor Agonist)
| Drug | Mechanism | Dose | Trial |
|---|
| Selexipag | Selective IP receptor agonist (non-prostanoid) | 200-1600 µg BD (oral; titrate) | GRIPHON trial: ↓ combined morbidity/mortality endpoint by 40% |
Advantages over prostanoids:
- Oral administration
- Selective IP receptor (avoids EP3-mediated side effects)
- Longer half-life than prostanoids
13.7 Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs)
ONLY for vasoreactive patients (positive vasoreactivity test)
| Drug | Dose | Preference |
|---|
| Nifedipine | 30-240 mg/day (extended release) | If heart rate ≤100/min |
| Diltiazem | 240-720 mg/day | If heart rate >100/min (diltiazem slows HR) |
| Amlodipine | 2.5-20 mg/day | Good tolerability |
AVOID verapamil - negative inotropic effect on already compromised RV
Warning: CCBs must NEVER be given to non-vasoreactive PAH patients (risk of hemodynamic collapse from acute RV failure)
13.8 Treatment Algorithm (2022 ESC/ERS - Initial Therapy)
NEWLY DIAGNOSED PAH
|
VASOREACTIVITY TEST?
(IPAH/Heritable only)
| |
POSITIVE (<5%) NEGATIVE (>95%)
| |
Long-term CCB Assess WHO FC + Comorbidities
| |
Re-assess at 3-6 months LOW/INT RISK HIGH RISK
If inadequate → switch (FC I-III) (FC IV)
|
INITIAL COMBINATION THERAPY TRIPLE COMBINATION
(Oral dual combination): including IV Prostanoid:
ERA + PDE5i ERA + PDE5i + Epoprostenol IV
(e.g., Macitentan + Tadalafil) (or Treprostinil IV/SC)
|
FOLLOW-UP REASSESSMENT AT 3-6 MONTHS
Risk stratification (3-strata model)
|
ACHIEVED LOW RISK? NOT ACHIEVED LOW RISK?
| |
Continue SEQUENTIAL COMBINATION
Add third drug
(e.g., add Selexipag to ERA+PDE5i)
|
STILL NOT AT LOW RISK?
|
LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
(refer early; bridge with IV prostanoid)
2022 ESC/ERS Key Change: Initial ORAL COMBINATION THERAPY (Era + PDE5i or sGC) is now preferred over monotherapy for most treatment-naive patients. This is a significant upgrade from previous "sequential add-on" approach.
SECTION 14: MANAGEMENT BY WHO GROUP
14.1 Group 1 PAH - Treatment Priorities
- Establish diagnosis via RHC at PH center
- Vasoreactivity testing (IPAH/heritable only)
- Risk stratification (low/intermediate/high)
- Initial combination oral therapy (ERA + PDE5i) for most patients
- High-risk/FC IV: IV epoprostenol as first-line or add-on
- Reassess at 3-6 months; escalate if not at low risk
- Lung transplantation listing for non-responders (bilateral lung or heart-lung)
SSc-PAH specifics:
- Screen annually with echo in all SSc patients
- Anti-centromere antibody positivity → higher PAH risk
- Respond less well to therapy than IPAH
- SSc-PAH accounts for 30% of SSc deaths (Harrison's 22E)
Portopulmonary PH:
- PVR must be <5 WU and mPAP <50 mmHg before liver transplantation (transplantation contraindicated with severe PH)
- Treat with ERA, PDE5i; IV prostanoids as bridge to transplantation
- Avoid β-blockers (used for portal hypertension) - worsen RV function
Congenital Heart Disease - Eisenmenger syndrome:
- PAH-specific therapy (bosentan - BREATHE-5 trial: improved 6MWD and hemodynamics)
- Lung transplantation + cardiac repair OR heart-lung transplantation
- Avoid pulmonary vasodilators that reduce systemic resistance without reducing PVR (risk of worsening right-to-left shunt)
14.2 Group 2 PH (Left Heart Disease) - Treatment Priorities
- Optimize treatment of underlying LHD (diuretics, ACEi/ARB, β-blockers, valve surgery)
- NO PAH-specific therapy for isolated post-capillary PH
- CpcPH with high PVR: PAH drugs may be considered in specialized centers only (riociguat contraindicated per LEPHT)
- Mitral valve repair/replacement for mitral stenosis → may resolve PH
- Left heart assist devices (LVAD) for end-stage HFrEF may lower PAP
CRITICAL EXAM POINT: PAH-specific drugs are NOT indicated for Group 2 PH. Sildenafil and riociguat showed harm (increased hospitalizations, no benefit) in HFpEF-related PH trials.
14.3 Group 3 PH (Lung Disease/Hypoxia) - Treatment Priorities
- Optimize management of underlying lung disease (bronchodilators, ICS for COPD; antifibrotics for IPF)
- Long-term oxygen therapy (PaO₂ <55 mmHg or SaO₂ <88%)
- Inhaled treprostinil (TYVASO): INCREASE trial (2021) showed benefit in ILD-PAH (IPF + PH): ↑ 6MWD +21 m at 16 weeks, ↓ clinical worsening
- No routine PAH therapy for mild-moderate Group 3 PH
- Severe "out-of-proportion" Group 3 PH (mPAP >35-40 mmHg despite advanced lung disease): refer to specialized center; consider PAH therapy
- Lung transplantation for advanced disease
Harrison's Caution: Systemic vasodilators in Group 3 PH can worsen V/Q mismatch by increasing blood flow to poorly ventilated areas → worsening hypoxemia.
14.4 Group 4 - CTEPH - Treatment Priorities
Cornerstone: Decide operability first
CTEPH CONFIRMED (RHC + CTPA + V/Q Scan)
|
MULTIDISCIPLINARY EXPERT TEAM ASSESSMENT
(technical operability + patient fitness)
|
OPERABLE INOPERABLE or RESIDUAL PH AFTER PEA
| PATIENT REFUSES |
PULMONARY | REASSESS AT 6 MONTHS
ENDARTERECTOMY BALLOON PULMONARY |
(PEA) - CURATIVE ANGIOPLASTY (BPA) If persistent PH:
| + Riociguat Riociguat (CHESS-1+)
ANTICOAGULANT (CHEST-1 trial) or BPA
(LIFELONG: LMWH
or VKA or DOAC)
Pulmonary Endarterectomy (PEA):
- Surgical removal of organized thrombus from main, lobar, and segmental pulmonary arteries
- Done via median sternotomy + cardiopulmonary bypass + deep hypothermic circulatory arrest
- Can be curative - normalizes PVR in 70-80% of cases
- Operative mortality: ~4-5% at expert centers
- Prognosis: 5-year survival >80% post-PEA
Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty (BPA):
- Catheter-based intervention for inoperable or distal CTEPH
- Multiple sessions required (typically 4-6 sessions)
- Complications: reperfusion pulmonary edema, vessel injury, hemoptysis
- Riociguat + BPA combination increasingly used
Riociguat (CHESS-1 trial):
- Approved for inoperable CTEPH or persistent/recurrent PH after PEA
- Improved 6MWD +46 m vs. placebo; improved PVR, WHO FC
- Class I recommendation for inoperable CTEPH (2022 ESC/ERS)
14.5 Group 5 - Miscellaneous
- Treat underlying condition (e.g., steroids for sarcoidosis, hydroxycarbamide for sickle cell)
- PAH-specific therapy may be considered on case-by-case basis
- No prospective RCT data for most Group 5 conditions
- Refer to expert PH center for individualized management
SECTION 15: SPECIAL SITUATIONS
15.1 Pregnancy and Contraception
| Contraception Method | Recommendation |
|---|
| Progesterone-only pill | Preferred oral contraceptive |
| Levonorgestrel/copper IUD | Highly recommended |
| Barrier methods + combined | Second line |
| Combined OCP (estrogen-containing) | AVOID - ↑ VTE + vasoconstriction risk |
If pregnancy occurs despite counseling:
- Multidisciplinary team (cardiologist, obstetrician, anesthesiologist, intensivist)
- IV epoprostenol as primary therapy during pregnancy
- Elective cesarean section preferred (around 28-34 weeks depending on status)
- Highest risk: peripartum and early postpartum period (acute RV failure)
15.2 Connective Tissue Disease-Associated PAH
Systemic Sclerosis (SSc-PAH):
- Screen ALL SSc patients annually: Echo + DLCO
- DETECT algorithm: for limited SSc patients with DLCO <60% predicted → echo + RHC
- Respond less well to PAH therapy compared to IPAH
- Macitentan + tadalafil combination → SERAPHIN + PHIRST data applicable
SLE-PAH:
- Immunosuppression (cyclophosphamide + glucocorticoids) may reduce PAP → treat inflammatory component
- PAH-specific therapy needed if vascular disease established
- Better prognosis than SSc-PAH
MCTD-PAH:
- Anti-U1-RNP antibodies
- Intermediate prognosis between IPAH and SSc-PAH
15.3 Portopulmonary Hypertension
- Definition: PAH in setting of portal hypertension (hepatic or non-hepatic)
- Prevalence: ~5-10% of patients with portal hypertension
- Mechanism: ↑ portal venous flow → ↑ pulmonary venous return → endothelial shear stress + humoral mediators (estrogens, gut-derived toxins)
- Liver transplantation CONTRAINDICATED if mPAP >50 mmHg or PVR >5 WU
- Treatment: ERA, PDE5i as first-line; IV prostanoids as bridge to transplant
- Avoid β-blockers (used for portal hypertension) - worsen RV function in significant PH
15.4 HIV-Associated PAH
- Prevalence: ~0.5% of HIV patients (higher than general population)
- Mechanism: HIV envelope protein gp120 → endothelial apoptosis; inflammatory cytokines
- Independent of CD4 count or viral load
- Treatment: HAART does not reverse established PAH
- PAH-specific therapy effective (similar to IPAH)
- Bosentan: interaction with antiretrovirals (CYP3A4)
- Prognosis: worse than IPAH; similar to CTD-PAH
15.5 CTEPH - Special Considerations
- 3-5% of acute PE patients develop CTEPH
- Underdiagnosed - median delay to diagnosis 14 months
- 2022 ESC/ERS: All acute PE patients should have structured follow-up at 3-6 months (TTE assessment)
- V/Q scan preferred over CTPA for CTEPH screening
- Anticoagulation: lifelong in all CTEPH patients regardless of PEA
- DOACs: widely used for anticoagulation in CTEPH (rivaroxaban, apixaban); less data than VKA but acceptable
SECTION 16: COMPLICATIONS
16.1 Right Ventricular Failure
- Most common cause of death in PAH
- Features: ↑ JVP, hepatomegaly, ascites, peripheral edema, ↓ BP, poor peripheral perfusion
- Management of acute RV failure in PAH:
- Optimize volume: cautious diuresis (avoid over-diuresis)
- Optimize preload: small IV fluid challenge if underfilled
- Vasopressors: norepinephrine (vasopressor of choice in cardiogenic shock with PH)
- Avoid: tachycardia, hypotension, hypoxia, acidosis, hypercarbia (all worsen RV)
- IV epoprostenol: initiate or escalate
- Consider VA-ECMO as bridge to transplantation in refractory cases
16.2 Arrhythmias
- Supraventricular tachycardias (SVT, atrial flutter, AF): poorly tolerated in PH
- Loss of atrial "kick" → acute ↓ CO → hemodynamic collapse
- Management: urgent electrical cardioversion if hemodynamically unstable
- Rate control: digoxin or amiodarone (avoid β-blockers - worsen RV failure)
- Anticoagulation: balance between CTEPH protection and bleeding risk
16.3 Hemoptysis
- Occurs in advanced PAH, CTEPH, Eisenmenger syndrome, PVOD
- Mechanism: rupture of dilated bronchial artery collaterals, plexiform lesions
- Management: bronchial artery embolization; avoid anticoagulation escalation acutely
16.4 Syncope
- Exertional syncope = ominous sign → WHO FC IV
- Mechanism: inability to augment CO with exercise → cerebral hypoperfusion
- Requires immediate escalation of therapy + listing for transplantation
16.5 Sudden Cardiac Death
- Occurs in 5-10% of PAH patients
- Mechanism: arrhythmia (VT/VF from RV hypertrophy/ischemia), acute RV failure
- ICD: no evidence of benefit in PAH (unlike SCD prevention in HFrEF)
SECTION 17: PROGNOSIS
17.1 Historical vs Modern Survival
| Era | 1-Year Survival | 3-Year Survival | 5-Year Survival |
|---|
| Pre-treatment era (<1990) | ~70% | ~48% | ~34% |
| Monotherapy era (1990-2010) | ~77% | ~60% | ~45% |
| Combination therapy era (>2010) | ~82% | ~67% | ~58% |
17.2 Poor Prognostic Factors
- WHO FC IV at diagnosis
- 6MWD <165 m
- NT-proBNP >1400 ng/L or BNP >200 pg/mL
- RA area >26 cm²
- TAPSE/sPAP <0.19 mm/mmHg
- CI <2.0 L/min/m²
- SvO₂ <60%
- RVEF <37%
- Pericardial effusion (moderate-large)
- Syncope on exertion
- Rapid progression
- No response to vasoreactivity testing
- CTD-PAH (especially SSc) vs IPAH
17.3 Good Prognostic Factors
- Vasoreactivity positive → long-term CCB responder
- Low-risk profile on 2022 ESC/ERS stratification
- FC I-II, 6MWD >440 m, BNP <50 pg/mL
- Young age, IPAH (vs APAH)
- Achievement of low-risk status on follow-up
SECTION 18: IMPORTANT TABLES
Table 1: Hemodynamic Definitions Summary
| Definition | mPAP | PAWP | PVR | Groups |
|---|
| Normal | ≤20 | ≤15 | <2 WU | - |
| Pre-capillary PH | >20 | ≤15 | >2 WU | 1, 3, 4, 5 |
| Isolated post-capillary PH | >20 | >15 | ≤2 WU | 2, 5 |
| Combined pre+post-capillary PH | >20 | >15 | >2 WU | 2, 5 |
| PAH (specific for Group 1) | >20 | ≤15 | >2 WU | Group 1 |
Table 2: WHO Classification Summary
| Group | Category | Common Examples | Hemodynamic Pattern |
|---|
| 1 | PAH | IPAH, CTD-PAH, CHD-PAH, HIV | Pre-capillary |
| 2 | Left heart disease | HFpEF, HFrEF, MR, MS, AS | Post-capillary |
| 3 | Lung disease/hypoxia | COPD, IPF, OSA | Pre-capillary |
| 4 | PA obstruction/CTEPH | Chronic PE, angiosarcoma | Pre-capillary |
| 5 | Miscellaneous | Sarcoidosis, SCD, MPN, LAM | Variable |
Table 3: Drug Comparison for PAH
| Drug Class | Drug | Route | Pathway | Half-Life | Key Trial |
|---|
| ERA | Bosentan | Oral | ET-A+B | 5 h | BREATHE-1 |
| ERA | Ambrisentan | Oral | ET-A | 9 h | ARIES-1/2 |
| ERA | Macitentan | Oral | ET-A+B | 16 h | SERAPHIN |
| PDE5i | Sildenafil | Oral | NO-cGMP | 4 h | SUPER-1 |
| PDE5i | Tadalafil | Oral | NO-cGMP | 17.5 h | PHIRST |
| sGC Stim | Riociguat | Oral | NO-cGMP | 12 h | PATENT-1 |
| Prostanoid | Epoprostenol | IV | PGI₂-cAMP | 3-5 min | Barst 1996 |
| Prostanoid | Treprostinil | IV/SC/inh/oral | PGI₂-cAMP | 4 h | TRIUMPH |
| Prostanoid | Iloprost | Inhaled | PGI₂-cAMP | 20-30 min | AIR |
| IP agonist | Selexipag | Oral | PGI₂-cAMP | 8-13 h | GRIPHON |
Table 4: CTEPH vs PAH - Key Differences
| Feature | PAH (Group 1) | CTEPH (Group 4) |
|---|
| Mechanism | Vascular remodeling | Organized thrombus + remodeling |
| V/Q scan | Normal or non-segmental | Segmental perfusion defects |
| CTPA | Normal PA or dilated | Webs, pouches, chronic thrombus |
| Anticoagulation | Not routinely indicated | Lifelong (all patients) |
| Specific treatment | PAH drugs (ERAs, PDE5i, prostanoids) | PEA + riociguat + BPA |
| Curative therapy | Lung transplantation | PEA (curative in 70-80%) |
| Vasoreactivity test | Appropriate (IPAH/heritable) | NOT indicated |
Table 5: Pre-Capillary vs Post-Capillary PH
| Feature | Pre-Capillary | Post-Capillary |
|---|
| Mechanism | Pulmonary arterial disease | Pulmonary venous hypertension (from LHD) |
| PAWP | ≤15 mmHg | >15 mmHg |
| PVR | >2 WU | ≤2 WU (IpcPH) or >2 WU (CpcPH) |
| Groups | 1, 3, 4, 5 | 2, 5 |
| PAH-specific drugs | YES | NO (for isolated IpcPH) |
| CXR | Clear fields or peripheral pruning | Pulmonary venous congestion |
SECTION 19: FLOWCHARTS
Flowchart 1: Diagnostic Approach
CLINICAL SUSPICION
(Unexplained dyspnea, known associated condition)
↓
STEP 1: INITIAL EVALUATION
- ECG, CXR, Pulse oximetry
- BNP/NT-proBNP
- CBC, LFTs, TFTs, ANA, anti-Scl-70
- HIV, hepatitis serology
↓
STEP 2: ECHOCARDIOGRAM (Screening)
↓ ↓ ↓
Low probability Intermediate High probability
PH unlikely probability PH likely
↓ ↓ ↓
Consider other PFTs + DLCO Refer to PH center
diagnoses HRCT chest
V/Q scan ↓
Sleep study STEP 3: RHC (Gold Standard)
↓
┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HEMODYNAMIC CLASSIFICATION │
├──────────────┬──────────────┬────────────┤
│ Pre-capillary│ Post-capillary│ Combined │
│ PAWP ≤15 │ PAWP >15 │ PAWP >15 │
│ PVR >2 │ PVR ≤2 │ PVR >2 │
├──────────────┼──────────────┼────────────┤
│Groups 1,3,4,5│ Group 2,5 │ Group 2,5 │
└──────────────┴──────────────┴────────────┘
↓
FURTHER DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP PER GROUP:
Group 1 (PAH): V/Q, CTD screen, genetics
Group 2: Echo, coronary angiography, LHD optimization
Group 3: PFTs, HRCT, ABG
Group 4 (CTEPH): V/Q, CTPA, DSA, operability assessment
Group 5: Specific work-up per underlying condition
Flowchart 2: Pathophysiology of PAH
TRIGGER (Genetic predisposition: BMPR2 + environmental/immune trigger)
↓
ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION
↙ ↓ ↘
↓ NO/PGI₂ ↑ Endothelin-1 Platelet activation
↓ ↓ ↓
Vasoconstriction Vasoconstriction In situ thrombosis
+ proliferation + proliferation
↓ ↓ ↓
___________________________________________
↓
PULMONARY VASCULAR REMODELING
(Intimal proliferation, medial hypertrophy,
adventitial fibrosis, plexiform lesions)
↓
PROGRESSIVE ↑ PVR + ↑ mPAP
↓
RV PRESSURE OVERLOAD
↙ ↘
ADAPTIVE (early) MALADAPTIVE (late)
RV hypertrophy RV dilatation
↑ RV systolic P Septal D-shift
Normal CO TR, ↓ CO
Venous congestion
Multi-organ failure → DEATH
Flowchart 3: Treatment Algorithm (2022 ESC/ERS)
NEWLY DIAGNOSED PAH (after RHC confirmation)
↓
GENERAL MEASURES + SUPPORTIVE CARE
(O₂, diuretics, anticoagulation per indication,
exercise rehabilitation, contraception, vaccinations)
↓
VASOREACTIVITY TESTING?
(IPAH/Heritable PAH only)
↙ ↘
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
(<5%) (>95%)
↓ ↓
CALCIUM CHANNEL RISK STRATIFICATION
BLOCKERS (CCB) (WHO FC + 6MWD + BNP + Echo + hemodynamics)
↓ ↙ ↓ ↘
Reassess 3-6 months LOW RISK INT RISK HIGH RISK
Adequate? → continue (FC I-II) (FC III) (FC IV)
Inadequate? → PAH therapy ↓ ↓ ↓
Oral combination Oral combination Triple combo:
ERA + PDE5i ERA + PDE5i ERA + PDE5i
(Macitentan + or ERA + riociguat + IV Epoprostenol
Tadalafil) ± selexipag or IV Treprostinil
↓ ↓ ↓
REASSESS AT 3-6 MONTHS (Risk stratification)
↓
ACHIEVED LOW RISK? → Continue
↓
NO → Escalate:
Add third agent (selexipag)
or switch prostanoid to IV
↓
STILL HIGH RISK?
↓
LUNG TRANSPLANT LISTING
(bilateral or heart-lung)
Flowchart 4: CTEPH Management
DOCUMENTED CTEPH (RHC + V/Q + CTPA)
↓
LIFELONG ANTICOAGULATION (all patients)
↓
MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM ASSESSMENT
(Surgeons + Interventionalists + PH specialists)
↙ ↘
OPERABLE INOPERABLE
↓ (distal disease, comorbidities)
PULMONARY ENDARTERECTOMY ↓
(PEA) - Surgery of choice RIOCIGUAT (Class I)
↓ +/- BPA (multiple sessions)
Reassess at 6 months ↓
Persistent PH? Reassess response
↓ ↓
→ Riociguat Transplantation if refractory
→ BPA (for residual distal disease)
SECTION 20: HIGH-YIELD EXAM PEARLS
20.1 Harrison's Key Points (22nd Edition)
- mPAP >20 mmHg (not ≥25 mmHg) is the current threshold for PH diagnosis
- Normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg; upper limit of normal = ~20 mmHg
- RHC is the gold standard for PH diagnosis
- BMPR2 mutations are found in ~75% familial PAH and ~25% sporadic IPAH; incomplete penetrance (15-20%)
- Vasoreactivity testing in IPAH/heritable PAH only; positive = ↓mPAP ≥10 mmHg to ≤40 mmHg without ↓CO
- Only <5% of IPAH are vasoreactive
- Epoprostenol IV is the ONLY PAH drug proven to improve survival in a landmark RCT
- Schistosomiasis affects >230 million globally; 5% develop PAH → one of the most common causes worldwide
- SCD (sickle cell disease): PH in 6-10% of patients
- CTEPH (Group 4): organized thrombus, not fresh PE; V/Q scan preferred screening tool
- PEA (pulmonary endarterectomy) can be curative for CTEPH
- PAH in SSc accounts for 30% of SSc deaths
- Pregnancy is CONTRAINDICATED in PAH; maternal mortality ~30-50%
- PAH-specific drugs NOT indicated in Group 2 (IpcPH); riociguat caused harm in HFpEF
- Riociguat - ONLY PAH drug approved for both PAH and CTEPH
- EIF2AK4 biallelic mutations are specific to PVOD/PCH
20.2 2022 ESC/ERS Guideline Updates vs Previous (2015)
| Parameter | 2015 ESC/ERS | 2022 ESC/ERS |
|---|
| PH definition | mPAP ≥25 mmHg | mPAP >20 mmHg |
| PVR threshold (PAH) | >3 WU | >2 WU |
| Exercise PH | Not defined | mPAP/CO slope >3 mmHg/L/min |
| Initial PAH therapy | Sequential monotherapy or dual | Initial oral combination (dual ERA+PDE5i) preferred |
| Anticoagulation IPAH | Class IIa (recommended) | Class IIb (may be considered) - downgraded |
| Risk model | 3-strata (low/int/high) | 4-strata: low/IL/IH/high |
| BPA for CTEPH | Emerging | Class I for inoperable CTEPH |
| Riociguat CTEPH | Approved | Confirmed Class I |
| Exercise rehab | Class IIb | Class I |
| 6th WSPH vs 2022 | Some differences | Largely harmonized |
20.3 Frequently Asked MD/DNB/DM Examination Questions
Q1: What is the current hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension?
A: mPAP >20 mmHg at rest (by RHC). Pre-capillary PH additionally requires PAWP ≤15 mmHg and PVR >2 WU.
Q2: What changed from the previous definition?
A: Previous threshold was ≥25 mmHg. Changed to >20 mmHg based on normative data (normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg; 20 mmHg = 97.5th percentile). PVR threshold also lowered from >3 WU to >2 WU.
Q3: What gene mutation is most commonly associated with familial PAH?
A: BMPR2 (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2) - ~75% familial, ~25% sporadic. Autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance (15-20%).
Q4: Which gene mutation is specific to PVOD/PCH?
A: EIF2AK4 (biallelic loss-of-function mutations; autosomal recessive).
Q5: What is the significance of vasoreactivity testing?
A: Identifies <5% of IPAH patients who respond to long-term CCBs. Positive = ↓mPAP ≥10 mmHg, absolute ≤40 mmHg, no ↓CO. Test should only be performed in IPAH/heritable PAH.
Q6: What is the most common cause of PH worldwide?
A: Group 2 (Left heart disease - HFpEF, HFrEF, mitral valve disease) is the most common overall cause of PH.
Q7: Which investigation is preferred for CTEPH screening?
A: V/Q (ventilation-perfusion) scan (sensitivity ~97% for CTEPH via segmental perfusion defects). Preferred over CTPA which can miss distal disease.
Q8: What is the only PAH drug with proven mortality benefit in a randomized trial?
A: Epoprostenol (IV prostacyclin) - Barst et al., NEJM 1996. RCT showed improved survival in severe PAH. All other trials used morbidity-mortality composite endpoints.
Q9: Which PAH-specific drug is approved for CTEPH?
A: Riociguat (sGC stimulator) - approved for inoperable CTEPH and persistent/recurrent PH after PEA (CHEST-1 trial).
Q10: What is the initial treatment strategy for newly diagnosed PAH in 2022 ESC/ERS?
A: Initial ORAL COMBINATION THERAPY with ERA + PDE5i (e.g., macitentan + tadalafil) for most patients. FC IV or high-risk patients: triple therapy including IV epoprostenol.
Q11: Why are PAH drugs contraindicated in Group 2 PH?
A: Systemic vasodilation without reducing pulmonary venous pressure → pulmonary edema. Riociguat/sildenafil trials in HFpEF showed ↑ hospitalizations, no mortality benefit.
Q12: What is the "gray zone" in PH diagnosis?
A: mPAP 21-24 mmHg with PVR 2-3 WU. These patients meet new hemodynamic criteria but have no approved therapies. They require careful monitoring.
Q13: Name the 3 molecular pathways targeted in PAH therapy.
A: 1) Endothelin pathway (ERAs), 2) Nitric oxide/cGMP pathway (PDE5i, sGC stimulators), 3) Prostacyclin/cAMP pathway (prostanoids, IP receptor agonists)
Q14: What is the prognostic significance of pericardial effusion in PAH?
A: High-risk marker (2022 ESC/ERS stratification). Indicates severe RV failure, venous hypertension, poor prognosis. Moderate-large pericardial effusion = high-risk category.
20.4 Clinical Pearls
- "Loud P2" is the most consistent physical sign of PH - heard at left upper sternal border (not apex)
- Pre-syncope or syncope on exertion = WHO FC IV = urgent treatment escalation/transplant referral
- PVOD/PCH: suspect when DLCO severely reduced, HRCT shows GGO + septal lines + lymphadenopathy. Avoid standard PAH vasodilators - risk of fatal pulmonary edema
- Portopulmonary PH: β-blockers used for portal hypertension management should be stopped if significant PH develops (worsen RV function)
- Diltiazem preferred over nifedipine in vasoreactive patients with tachycardia (diltiazem slows HR)
- V/Q BEFORE CTPA in all unexplained PH patients to exclude CTEPH
- D-shaped interventricular septum on echo/CT = RV pressure overload (pushes septum into LV in systole)
- TAPSE/sPAP ratio is the key RV-PA coupling parameter: <0.19 mm/mmHg = high risk (RV uncoupled from PA)
- The "silent zone" of PH: RHC abnormal, echo inconclusive - always trust RHC over echo
- Macitentan (SERAPHIN trial) was the first PAH trial to use morbidity AND mortality as primary endpoint (previously only 6MWD)
20.5 Mnemonics
PAH Drug Classes - "EPICS":
- E - Endothelin receptor antagonists (bosentan, ambrisentan, macitentan)
- P - PDE-5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil)
- I - IP receptor agonist (selexipag)
- C - Calcium channel blockers (vasoreactive only)
- S - Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators (riociguat)
- (+ Prostanoids: epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost)
Vasoreactivity Positive Criteria - "10-40-NO CO DROP":
- Drop in mPAP by ≥10 mmHg
- Absolute mPAP ≤40 mmHg
- NO decrease in cardiac output
WHO Groups - "PALE Mix":
- P - PAH (Group 1 - Pulmonary Arterial)
- A - Left hEArt disease (Group 2)
- L - Lung disease/hypoxia (Group 3)
- E - pulmonary artEry Emboli/CTEPH (Group 4)
- Mix - Miscellaneous (Group 5)
Poor Prognostic Markers - "SPEED":
- S - Syncope on exertion, Severe RV failure signs
- P - Poor 6MWD (<165 m), Pericardial effusion
- E - Elevated BNP/NT-proBNP, Ejection fraction of RV <37%
- E - Elevated RAP >14, Elevated PVR
- D - Decreased CI (<2.0 L/min/m²), Decreased SvO₂ (<60%)
SUMMARY BOX: "TOP 20 EXAM-READY FACTS"
| # | Fact |
|---|
| 1 | PH = mPAP >20 mmHg (RHC); changed from ≥25 mmHg in 2022 ESC/ERS |
| 2 | Normal mPAP = 14 ± 3.3 mmHg |
| 3 | BMPR2 mutation in 75% familial PAH; incomplete penetrance 15-20% |
| 4 | EIF2AK4 = PVOD/PCH specific mutation |
| 5 | Vasoreactive = <5% of IPAH; positive = ↓mPAP ≥10 to ≤40 mmHg, no ↓CO |
| 6 | V/Q scan is BEST screening tool for CTEPH (sensitivity ~97%) |
| 7 | Epoprostenol IV = ONLY drug with survival benefit in RCT |
| 8 | Riociguat = ONLY PAH drug approved for CTEPH |
| 9 | Initial therapy = ERA + PDE5i combination (2022 ESC/ERS) |
| 10 | PAH drugs CONTRAINDICATED in Group 2 (isolated post-capillary PH) |
| 11 | Pregnancy CONTRAINDICATED in PAH (mortality 30-50%) |
| 12 | PEA = curative in 70-80% operable CTEPH |
| 13 | Lifelong anticoagulation in ALL CTEPH patients |
| 14 | Schistosomiasis = most common cause of PAH worldwide (5% of infected develop PAH) |
| 15 | SSc-PAH = 30% of SSc deaths; screen all SSc annually |
| 16 | TAPSE/sPAP <0.19 mm/mmHg = RV-PA uncoupling, high risk |
| 17 | PDE5i + riociguat = ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED together |
| 18 | Anti-centromere antibody in limited SSc = highest PAH risk |
| 19 | TAPSE <18 mm = RV systolic dysfunction |
| 20 | Portopulmonary PH: mPAP >50 mmHg or PVR >5 WU = contraindication to liver transplant |
Sources: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22nd Edition (2025, McGraw-Hill); Murray & Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine (2022); 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension (Humbert M et al., Eur Heart J 2022; PMID: 36017548); Updated Hemodynamic Definitions and Clinical Classification review (PMC10971453)