One ear is profound and one ear is normal which cros hearing aid will go
Reading File
Searching the Web
CROS vs BiCROS hearing aid single sided deafness profound loss normal ear
Finding Sources
Reading File
Here is a clear, complete answer:
For One Profound Ear + One Normal Ear: Use a CROS Hearing Aid
The Core Rule
| Situation | Device |
|---|---|
| One ear: profound/deaf, Other ear: normal hearing | CROS |
| One ear: profound/deaf, Other ear: mild-moderate loss | BiCROS |
Since your better ear has normal hearing, it does NOT need any amplification - so a CROS (not BiCROS) is the correct choice.
How CROS Works
- A microphone/transmitter is worn on the deaf (profound) ear
- It picks up sounds from that side and wirelessly sends them to a receiver worn on the normal ear
- The normal ear then hears sounds from both sides of the head
- This eliminates the head shadow effect - the problem where your head physically blocks sound coming from the deaf side
Why Not BiCROS?
BiCROS = CROS system plus amplification for the better ear. It is only indicated when the better ear also has some degree of hearing loss that needs correcting. Since your better ear is normal, the extra amplification of BiCROS would be unnecessary and uncomfortable.
Other Options for Single-Sided Deafness (to know)
Hearing rehab is not limited to CROS. Other options include:
-
Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA/Ponto) - an osseointegrated device that conducts sound through the skull bone to the normal cochlea. Recommended when the better ear's pure tone average is 20 dB HL or better. Eliminates the head shadow effect but does not restore true localization.
-
Cochlear implant - can be placed in the deaf ear. Early studies show good speech understanding in noise, improved sound localization, and relief of tinnitus. This is the only option that attempts to restore hearing in the deaf ear itself.
Key Limitation of CROS
CROS and BAHA both route sound to the hearing ear - they do not restore hearing in the deaf ear or give true binaural (two-sided) hearing. Sound localization remains impaired. Only a cochlear implant can address this.
(Source: KJ Lee's Essential Otolaryngology - "Options for Single-Sided Deafness"; Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22E)
Which type of cros will go in this case
For one profound ear + one normal ear, the answer is straightforward:
CROS (Contralateral Routing of Signal)
Here is exactly why:
The Decision Logic
Better ear = NORMAL hearing?
↓
YES → CROS
↓
Better ear = has some loss too?
↓
YES → BiCROS
Your Case Specifically
| Ear | Status | Device fitted here |
|---|---|---|
| Profound ear (bad side) | No usable hearing | Transmitter/microphone only |
| Normal ear (good side) | Normal hearing | Receiver only (NO amplification) |
The receiver on the normal ear simply passes the signal through - it does not amplify, because the cochlea is working fine. This is what defines a CROS and separates it from BiCROS.
Why NOT BiCROS?
BiCROS adds amplification at the better ear. If the better ear is normal, adding amplification would:
- Distort naturally heard sounds
- Be uncomfortable
- Provide no benefit
BiCROS is only for when the better ear itself has some hearing loss (mild to moderate) needing a boost alongside the routed signal.
In Summary
One profound ear + One normal ear = CROS (pure signal routing, no amplification on the good side)
Ric will go or bte type will go in this case
Searching the Web
CROS hearing aid RIC vs BTE form factor which is better single sided deafness
RIC vs BTE for CROS - Which Goes in This Case?
Short Answer: RIC (Receiver-in-Canal) is preferred for this case
Why RIC is the Better Choice Here
Remember - in your case (profound + normal ear):
- The normal ear receives the CROS signal
- The normal ear needs zero amplification
- You only need a lightweight receiver to deliver routed sound
| Feature | RIC CROS | BTE CROS |
|---|---|---|
| Size | Small, discreet | Larger |
| Amplification power | Mild-moderate | Severe-profound |
| Comfort on normal ear | Better (open fit dome) | Heavier, more occlusive |
| Sound quality on normal ear | Natural, less occlusion | Can feel "blocked" |
| Battery life | Smaller battery | Larger battery |
| Best for | Normal/mild-moderate better ear | Severe/profound better ear |
The Key Reasoning
On the normal ear (the receiving side):
- You do NOT need high power amplification
- An open-fit RIC with a dome allows natural hearing to pass through unobstructed
- This prevents the occlusion effect - the "blocked" or "echo-y" sensation a BTE earmold can cause on a normal ear
- RIC sits discreetly behind the ear with just a thin wire into the canal
On the profound ear (the transmitter side):
- Only a microphone/transmitter is needed - no receiver at all
- Both RIC and BTE transmitters look similar on this side
- Most modern CROS systems (Phonak, Signia, Widex) offer RIC-style transmitters
BTE Would Be Used If...
- The patient has a physical deformity of the ear canal (cannot use dome/receiver)
- The better ear has severe-to-profound loss needing high power (but then it's BiCROS, not CROS)
- Patient preference or dexterity issues favor a larger device
Bottom Line
Profound ear + Normal ear = CROS system using RIC style
- Transmitter (RIC or mini-BTE) on the profound side
- Open-fit RIC receiver on the normal side - no amplification, just signal delivery
Most leading brands (Phonak CROS P/Lumity, Signia CROS, Widex CROS) all offer RIC-based CROS systems as their primary option precisely for this reason.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.