So today, a seven-year-old girl came, grade 2, with a sudden onset since 2-3 months of neuropathy pertaining to peroneal nerve. So she has inversion, right, and she buckles at her ankle. So there is no obvious any history associated with that. But since a year or so, she used to complain of leg pains at night and wants mom to, you know, press her legs and The father has a history of, um, uh, hi- uh, sorry, glove and socks kind of a neuropathy presentation where bilateral foot drop he has, and he has a neuropathy distally only in both hands and both feet below the knee, which is 20... non-progressive since 26 years. So, um, what should I suspect? She has come for physiotherapy treatment to me.

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease children foot drop physiotherapy

Searching the Web

Charcot Marie Tooth disease child peroneal neuropathy foot drop hereditary growing pains physiotherapy management

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
I now have enough textbook and web evidence to give a thorough, clinically grounded answer. Let me compile this.

Clinical Impression: This is almost certainly a Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy (HMSN) - most likely Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease (CMT)

The constellation of findings here is highly characteristic. Let me break it down systematically.

Why CMT fits so well

The father's picture is the key anchor:
  • Bilateral foot drop
  • Distal-only neuropathy - glove-and-stocking pattern in both hands and both feet below the knee
  • Non-progressive over 26 years
  • Bilateral and symmetric
This is the textbook description of CMT (HMSN). The textbooks describe it as "the most common inherited peripheral neuropathy, affecting up to 1 in 2,500 people" and characterize it as "an inherited disease associated with distal muscle atrophy, sensory loss, and foot deformities" - Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease.
The child's picture fits perfectly with CMT1A (or possibly HNPP) presenting in childhood:
  • Peroneal nerve distribution weakness causing ankle inversion/buckling - this is the classic first presentation of CMT
  • Age 7, so within the first decade - CMT1A "usually presents in the first or early second decade of life as a slowly progressive distal demyelinating motor and sensory neuropathy with motor symptoms predominating" - Robbins PBD
  • Nocturnal leg pains over the past year - a well-recognized prodromal/early symptom in CMT children, often dismissed as "growing pains," but in fact representing sensory nerve involvement
The autosomal dominant inheritance pattern is consistent with CMT1A (the most common subtype, ~55% of genetically defined CMT, caused by PMP22 duplication on chromosome 17p11.2-12).

Differential to keep in mind: HNPP

Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies (HNPP) is the other important diagnosis to consider, especially because:
  • The child presents with a single, relatively acute peroneal mononeuropathy (2-3 months)
  • HNPP is caused by deletion of PMP22 (the reciprocal of the CMT1A duplication)
  • It presents with recurrent, episodic, pressure-sensitive mononeuropathies - the peroneal nerve at the fibular head is one of the most common sites
  • Frameworks for Internal Medicine describes: "recurrent episodes of bilateral lower extremity weakness and numbness that usually occur after periods of prolonged sitting"
The father's non-progressive bilateral foot drop over 26 years also fits HNPP (slow accumulation of deficits from repeated pressure palsies). The distinction matters because management differs - in HNPP, the primary strategy is to prevent nerve injury by avoiding pressure damage.

Summary of the Two Most Likely Diagnoses

FeatureCMT1AHNPP
GeneticsPMP22 duplication (AD)PMP22 deletion (AD)
Father's pictureFits (bilateral foot drop, distal, non-progressive)Fits (accumulated palsies)
Child's presentationFits (peroneal weakness, childhood onset)Fits very well (acute peroneal palsy)
Night leg painsReported in early CMTLess typical
ProgressionSlowly progressiveEpisodic, partially reversible
You cannot clinically distinguish them with certainty - genetic testing is the gold standard.

What you should do / recommend as a physiotherapist

1. Flag this for medical referral urgently:
  • The child needs a pediatric neurologist or neuromuscular specialist
  • Investigations needed: nerve conduction studies (NCS/EMG) in both the child and father; genetic testing for PMP22 duplication/deletion
  • If father hasn't been genetically confirmed, this case presents a perfect opportunity for the whole family to get tested
2. Your immediate physiotherapy role:
  • Do NOT perform aggressive stretching, weight-bearing exercises on the peroneal nerve, or deep cross-friction massage at the fibular head area - if this is HNPP, pressure and traction worsen nerve injury
  • Address the ankle inversion / foot drop with gentle dorsiflexion muscle strengthening (tibialis anterior, peronei)
  • Ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) - this is first-line for functional foot drop in CMT children; prevents falls, supports gait, and may reduce progressive deformity
  • Stretching of the Achilles tendon / plantar fascia - pes cavus is a common secondary deformity in CMT; early stretching and night splinting can delay its evolution
  • Balance and proprioceptive training - CMT children have significant balance deficits due to combined motor and sensory loss
  • Avoid prolonged compression at the fibular head (avoid sitting with legs crossed, kneeling for long periods) - relevant whether it is CMT or HNPP
3. Monitor for pes cavus development - if symptoms began at age 7, foot deformity may develop as she grows. Early orthotic intervention is key per the CMT UK physiotherapy guidelines.

Bottom Line

This child almost certainly has an autosomal dominant hereditary neuropathy inherited from her father - the two most likely diagnoses are CMT1A (HMSN type 1) or HNPP, both arising from the PMP22 gene region on chromosome 17. The "growing pains" at night over the past year were likely early sensory symptoms. The father's 26-year non-progressive bilateral pattern is classic for either condition.
As the physiotherapist, your most important action right now is to strongly advocate for neurological investigation and genetic testing for both the child and father, while beginning safe functional rehabilitation focused on ankle support, balance, and preventing secondary deformity. Do not delay this referral - the earlier CMT is confirmed in a growing child, the more impactful orthotic and exercise interventions are.
Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease: CMT1A "usually presents in the first or early second decade of life as a slowly progressive distal demyelinating motor and sensory neuropathy" | Bradley and Daroff's Neurology: In HNPP, "the primary treatment strategy is to prevent nerve injury by avoiding pressure damage"

If it cmt what should we expect further

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

CMT Charcot Marie Tooth disease natural history progression children adults what to expect

Finding Sources
Reading Web Page

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4725690

Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Excellent - I now have solid textbook data and the PMC natural history review. Here is a comprehensive answer:

What to Expect if This is CMT - The Natural History

Think of CMT as a slowly marching, length-dependent, distal-to-proximal process. The nerves that are longest get hit first and worst. Here is what unfolds over time, roughly in sequence:

Phase 1 - What's Already Happening (Age 5-10)

  • Peroneal weakness - foot drop, ankle instability, tendency to invert - she is already here
  • Night leg pains / cramps - sensory nerve irritation before frank sensory loss - she already had this
  • Clumsiness, slow running, poor balance - often dismissed as "just the way the child is"
  • Absent or reduced ankle deep tendon reflexes - check this; it's an early sign
  • Deep tendon reflexes at the knee are typically preserved at this stage

Phase 2 - Foot and Gait Deformity Develops (Over the Next 5-10 Years)

This is the most predictable thing you will see evolve:
  • Pes cavus (high arch) - as the intrinsic foot muscles weaken, the arch rises. In a growing child this becomes structural and fixed over time
  • Hammer toes / claw toes - imbalance between intrinsic (weak) and extrinsic toe flexors
  • Steppage gait - she compensates for foot drop by exaggerated hip/knee flexion to clear the foot
  • Recurrent ankle sprains - due to peroneal weakness, poor proprioception, and cavovarus deformity
  • Metatarsalgia / pain under the ball of the foot - callus formation from abnormal weight distribution
The Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 2026 textbook notes: "Initial complaints are usually general weakness of the foot and unsteady gait. Foot problems include pain under the metatarsal heads, claw toes, foot fatigue, and difficulty wearing regular shoes."

Phase 3 - The "Inverted Champagne Bottle" Legs (Adolescence to Early Adulthood)

  • Distal leg muscle atrophy - the classic appearance. Thighs remain normal, calves and shin muscles waste away giving the characteristic "stork leg" or "inverted champagne bottle" shape
  • Weakness creeps proximally - from ankle dorsiflexors up to the lower leg, eventually the thighs
  • Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) become necessary - Goldman-Cecil Medicine states: "Ankle-foot orthoses are frequently required by the third decade"
  • Falls increase - balance is compromised by both motor weakness and sensory loss (vibration and proprioception go first)

Phase 4 - Upper Limb Involvement (Late Adolescence / Adulthood)

  • Intrinsic hand muscle weakness - fine motor difficulties: fastening buttons, zippers, jewelry, writing, turning keys
  • Distal hand/forearm atrophy
  • Sensory loss in hands - the father already has this (glove distribution)
  • Goldman-Cecil notes specifically: "Fine hand movements such as fastening jewelry, turning a key, or using buttons and zippers may be impaired"

What About Prognosis? (The Good News for CMT1A Specifically)

This is important. The prognosis varies enormously by CMT subtype, and if the father has been non-progressive for 26 years, this points toward a milder subtype - likely CMT1A:
CMT TypePrognosis
CMT1A (most likely here)Slowly progressive, most patients remain ambulatory for life. Wheelchair use is rare
CMT2A (MFN2 mutation)Severe - many become non-ambulatory by their 20s
CMT1B (MPZ)Variable - infancy onset is severe; adult onset is mild
CMT4 (recessive)Early onset, more rapid progression
Campbell's 2026 states directly: "Patients with the most common form, CMT1A... rarely require the use of a wheelchair."
The natural history data from a 5-year longitudinal study of CMT1A shows that the rate of axonal loss approaches that of age-matched controls, but the patient starts from a lower baseline reserve. Meaning: the disease is slowly progressive but not dramatically worsening year-on-year in CMT1A.

Other Things to Watch For

  • Scoliosis - occurs in a subset of CMT children, especially during the growth spurt. Screen for it annually
  • Hip dysplasia - less common, but reported
  • Hearing loss - rare, seen in some CMT subtypes (CMTX, certain CMT1 mutations)
  • Fatigue - a very real and often underappreciated symptom; children tire easily over long distances (school corridors, malls) due to the extra energy cost of compensated gait
  • Respiratory involvement - extremely rare in CMT1A, more a concern in severe axonal forms

The Father's Course as Your Prognostic Guide

This is clinically very useful. The father has had stable bilateral foot drop + distal glove-stocking neuropathy for 26 years without progression. In autosomal dominant CMT1A, family members often have very similar phenotypes. This child is likely to follow a similar course - which is actually reassuring. She is unlikely to become wheelchair dependent. She will need:
  • AFOs long-term
  • Likely foot surgery at some point (tendon transfer, plantar fasciotomy, osteotomy for pes cavus correction) - typically in the teenage years if deformity is structural
  • Ongoing physiotherapy throughout life for strengthening, balance, and functional training
  • Possible hand therapy when upper limb involvement begins
  • Annual monitoring for scoliosis, gait change, and new functional losses

Your Key Monitoring Parameters as a Physiotherapist

Track these at every visit:
  1. Ankle dorsiflexion range (passive and active)
  2. Peroneal muscle strength (manual muscle test)
  3. Heel-rise test - calf strength indicator
  4. Foot posture index - early pes cavus detection
  5. Balance - single leg stance, functional reach
  6. Gait analysis - steppage gait, trunk compensations
  7. Timed 10-meter walk / 6-minute walk for longitudinal comparison
  8. Hand grip and pinch strength - as she gets older
Sources: Goldman-Cecil Medicine 26th Ed; Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 2026; Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease; Multidisciplinary CMT Management Review, PMC

If it cmt what should we expect further

I just answered this in detail above! Here's a quick summary of the key points in case you'd like a more concise version:

What to Expect if CMT - Summary

Near Term (she's already in this phase)

  • Peroneal weakness / ankle instability - already present
  • Night leg cramps / sensory discomfort - already present
  • Absent ankle deep tendon reflexes - check this now
  • Clumsiness, slow running, poor balance

Over the Next 5-10 Years (childhood into adolescence)

  • Pes cavus (high arch develops and becomes fixed as she grows)
  • Claw/hammer toes
  • Steppage gait worsens
  • Recurrent ankle sprains from peroneal weakness + poor proprioception
  • Distal leg muscle atrophy - the classic "inverted champagne bottle" / stork leg appearance
  • AFO likely needed by her teens (Goldman-Cecil states: "ankle-foot orthoses are frequently required by the third decade")

Later (adolescence into adulthood)

  • Fine hand motor difficulty - buttons, zippers, writing, keys
  • Distal hand/forearm atrophy - as the father already has
  • Falls risk increases - due to combined motor + sensory (proprioception) loss
  • Watch for scoliosis during growth spurts - screen annually
  • Fatigue with walking long distances is real and underappreciated

Prognosis - The Reassuring Part

Given the father's 26-year non-progressive course, this is almost certainly CMT1A, which has the best prognosis of all subtypes. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 2026 states directly: "Patients with CMT1A rarely require the use of a wheelchair." Most remain ambulatory for life.
She will likely follow her father's trajectory. The disease is slowly progressive but not dramatically worsening year to year in CMT1A.

Would you like me to go into the physiotherapy management plan for each phase, or the orthopaedic surgical decision-making (when to refer for tendon transfer, pes cavus correction, etc.)?

Wars 1

Could you clarify what you mean by "Wars 1"? This seems like it may have been a voice dictation error or an incomplete message.
Did you mean:
  1. Warts - as in plantar warts or verrucae (relevant to CMT foot care)?
  2. WARS1 - a gene associated with a CMT subtype (glycyl/tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase)?
  3. Something completely different - a topic change to World War 1?
  4. A continuation of the CMT discussion - perhaps "What are the Stage 1" findings?
Let me know and I'll answer straight away.

Because the father has been suspect-- has been diagnosed with WARS1 gene, which is a pathogenic variant in heterozygous. So what are we looking now into the child?

Searching PubMed

WARS1 gene mutation Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy

Searching the Web

WARS1 gene pathogenic variant heterozygous CMT neuropathy clinical features prognosis children

Finding Sources
Reading Article

PMID: 35815345

Reading Article

PMID: 31069783

Searching the Web

WARS1 heterozygous dominant CMT2 distal hereditary motor neuropathy phenotype OMIM 617721

Reading Web Page

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/1…

Searching PubMed

WARS tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase distal hereditary motor neuropathy dominant

Reading Article

PMID: 28369220

Now I have everything needed for a precise, gene-specific answer. This is a significant clinical distinction.

WARS1 Heterozygous - What This Means for the Child

This is a very specific and important genetic finding. Let me break down exactly what WARS1 tells you.

What is WARS1?

WARS1 (also previously called WARS) encodes cytoplasmic tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (TrpRS) - an enzyme that charges tryptophan onto its cognate tRNA. It belongs to the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) gene family, five members of which (AARS1, GARS1, HARS1, YARS1, WARS1) are strongly linked to dominant peripheral neuropathy.
  • OMIM #617721
  • Inheritance: Autosomal dominant - one mutant copy is sufficient to cause disease
  • The seminal paper (Tsai et al., Brain 2017) established WARS as a cause of autosomal dominant distal hereditary motor neuropathy (dHMN type IX)
  • The mechanism is a dominant-negative effect on aminoacylation activity - it is NOT simple haploinsufficiency, meaning the mutant protein actively interferes with the normal copy

The Key Clinical Distinction: This is a Distal Hereditary Motor Neuropathy (dHMN), not classical CMT

This is crucial for you to understand. WARS1 heterozygous mutations cause predominantly or purely motor neuropathy - with minimal or no sensory involvement. This explains the father's clinical picture very well:
FeatureClassical CMT1AWARS1 dHMN
Motor weaknessYes, distalYes, distal - predominant
Sensory lossYes, glove-stockingMinimal or absent
Nerve conductionDemyelinating (slow NCV)Axonal (normal or near-normal NCV, reduced CMAP)
ProgressionSlow, lifelongSlow, often mild-moderate
Foot dropYesYes - common first symptom
Upper limbLater, distalCan occur, usually mild
Sensory complaintsCommonMinimal
The Wang et al. 2019 paper (PMID 31069783) on a Chinese dHMN family with WARS mutation found: "clinical features included juvenile to adult onset (15-23 years), distal wasting and weakness, minimal sensory disturbance and length-dependent motor axonal degeneration."

What to Expect in This 7-Year-Old

Given that she has a heterozygous WARS1 pathogenic variant inherited from her father:
1. The neuropathy is predominantly MOTOR
  • She will have progressive distal limb weakness - feet and legs first, hands later
  • Sensory loss will be minimal - this is different from classic CMT
  • This means her proprioception and balance may be relatively better preserved initially compared to CMT1A
  • But motor weakness and atrophy will be the dominant problem
2. Onset pattern - she is already showing it
  • Father's onset was in adolescence/adulthood (the family paper shows onset 15-23 years)
  • This child is presenting at age 7 which is earlier than typical - watch her carefully
  • Early onset can sometimes signal a slightly more severe phenotype, though intrafamilial variability is well documented in ARS neuropathies
3. NCS/EMG findings to expect
  • Axonal pattern - reduced compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude, relatively preserved nerve conduction velocity (NCV >38 m/s)
  • Sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) relatively preserved or only mildly reduced
  • This is the NCS signature of dHMN / CMT2, not the slow-velocity demyelinating pattern of CMT1A
4. Progression timeline
  • Father's 26-year non-progressive stable course is the best prognostic guide
  • WARS1 dHMN tends to be slowly progressive and relatively mild to moderate
  • Most patients maintain ambulation throughout life
  • The Tsai et al. Brain 2017 cohort showed the mutation causes distal limb weakness and atrophy with a relatively mild functional course
5. What will evolve over years
  • Progressive peroneal and tibial muscle weakness - foot drop will worsen unless managed
  • Intrinsic foot muscle atrophy - pes cavus may develop but may be less severe than in demyelinating CMT
  • Steppage gait worsening
  • Eventually hand intrinsic muscle weakness - fine motor tasks
  • No significant sensory loss expected - this is actually reassuring for balance, pressure sore risk, and quality of life

Critical Point: Biallelic vs. Heterozygous WARS1

There is an important distinction in the literature:
  • Heterozygous (what father and child have): dominant dHMN - motor neuropathy, generally milder, compatible with active life
  • Biallelic / homozygous WARS1 (different!): causes a severe neurodevelopmental syndrome with intellectual disability, hearing impairment, microcephaly, and brain abnormalities (Lin et al. Hum Mutat 2022, PMID 35815345)
Since the child has only the heterozygous variant from the father, you are dealing with the milder dominant motor neuropathy picture - NOT the severe neurodevelopmental syndrome. This is very reassuring.

Implications for Your Physiotherapy Management

Knowing it is WARS1 dHMN specifically:
  1. Sensory testing is still important - even though sensory loss is minimal, check vibration and proprioception at every visit; any sensory decline warrants urgent neurological review
  2. Motor strength monitoring is your primary metric - manual muscle testing of tibialis anterior, peronei, intrinsics, toe extensors at every session
  3. AFO is still indicated - foot drop is motor-driven; AFO will prevent falls and compensatory gait deformities
  4. Strengthening exercises are appropriate and beneficial - since this is axonal/motor, strengthening programmes are well tolerated in dHMN (unlike demyelinating forms where over-fatigue is a concern)
  5. Less risk of pressure sores / insensate foot compared to classic CMT - she retains sensation, so standard orthotics are safer and she can give feedback on fit
  6. Genetic counselling for the family - autosomal dominant means each child of an affected parent has a 50% chance of inheriting the variant. If there are siblings, they should be assessed

What the Father's Stable Course Tells You

If the father has had non-progressive bilateral foot drop and distal hand involvement for 26 years with WARS1, and he remains ambulatory and functional - this child is likely to follow a similar trajectory. WARS1 dHMN is one of the more benign hereditary neuropathies. She will need lifelong support, but the prognosis for independent ambulation and quality of life is good.
Key references: Tsai et al., Brain 2017 (PMID 28369220) - foundational WARS paper; Wang et al., Clin Genet 2019 (PMID 31069783) - confirmed mild-moderate phenotype; Lin et al., Hum Mutat 2022 (PMID 35815345) - biallelic vs heterozygous distinction
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.