I now have comprehensive data. Let me compile the full, detailed overview.
Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) in Ovarian Cancer: A Detailed Overview
1. Introduction and Background
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy, with approximately 70% of patients presenting at advanced stage. Despite high initial response rates to platinum-based chemotherapy, most patients relapse. The treatment landscape has been transformed by three pivotal developments: PARP inhibitors, antiangiogenic agents, and now antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).
ADCs represent a class of "guided missiles" - combining the selectivity of a monoclonal antibody with the cytotoxic potency of a small-molecule drug. They have emerged as one of the most exciting therapeutic platforms in oncology, and in ovarian cancer, mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) became the first ADC to demonstrate an overall survival benefit in the platinum-resistant setting.
2. ADC Architecture and Mechanism of Action
2.1 Structural Components
An ADC consists of three essential components:
| Component | Function | Examples in Ovarian Cancer ADCs |
|---|
| Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) | Binds tumor-specific antigen with high selectivity | Anti-FRα (MIRV), Anti-HER2 (T-DXd), Anti-NaPi2b (upifitamab), Anti-CDH6 (raludotatug), Anti-Trop-2 (dato-DXd) |
| Linker | Connects antibody to payload; controls stability and release | Cleavable (pH-sensitive, protease-cleavable) or non-cleavable |
| Cytotoxic Payload | Delivers cell kill upon internalization | Maytansinoid DM4 (MIRV), DXd/topoisomerase-I inhibitor (T-DXd, raludotatug, dato-DXd), auristatin (MMAE) |
| Drug-Antibody Ratio (DAR) | Number of payload molecules per antibody | Typically 2-8; higher DAR can increase efficacy but also toxicity |
2.2 Step-by-Step Mechanism of Action
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ADC MECHANISM OF ACTION │
│ │
│ 1. ANTIGEN BINDING │
│ ADC (mAb + Linker + Payload) ──► Binds surface antigen on │
│ tumor cell (e.g., FRα, HER2, NaPi2b) │
│ │
│ 2. INTERNALIZATION (Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis) │
│ ADC-antigen complex ──► Clathrin-coated pit ──► Endosome │
│ │
│ 3. LYSOSOMAL PROCESSING │
│ Endosome ──► Lysosome ──► Linker cleavage by │
│ low pH / cathepsin B / other proteases │
│ │
│ 4. PAYLOAD RELEASE │
│ Free cytotoxin released into cytoplasm │
│ - DM4: binds tubulin → microtubule disruption → G2/M arrest → apoptosis│
│ - DXd: DNA topoisomerase I inhibition → DNA DSB → apoptosis │
│ │
│ 5. BYSTANDER EFFECT (cleavable linkers only) │
│ Membrane-permeable payload diffuses to adjacent │
│ antigen-negative tumor cells → additional cell kill │
│ (particularly relevant for heterogeneous tumors) │
│ │
│ 6. IMMUNE ACTIVATION (secondary) │
│ Immunogenic cell death → release of DAMPs → DC activation │
│ → T-cell priming (synergy with ICIs) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.3 Key Differences Between Payload Classes
| Payload Class | Drug | Mechanism | Bystander Effect | Key Toxicity |
|---|
| Maytansinoids | DM4, DM1 | Tubulin polymerization inhibition | Limited | Peripheral neuropathy, ocular |
| Topoisomerase-I inhibitors | DXd (exatecan derivative) | DNA TOP1 inhibition, DSBs | High (membrane permeable) | ILD, myelosuppression |
| Auristatins | MMAE, MMAF | Tubulin depolymerization | Moderate (MMAE) | Neuropathy, neutropenia |
| Calicheamicins | Ozogamicin | DNA double-strand breaks | Low | Hepatotoxicity, VOD |
3. Key Targets in Ovarian Cancer
3.1 Folate Receptor Alpha (FRα / FOLR1)
FRα is the most validated and clinically successful target in ovarian cancer:
- Expressed in ~80% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC)
- Markedly overexpressed on tumor surfaces vs. normal tissues (where expression is basolateral and inaccessible)
- Expression is inversely correlated with platinum sensitivity - higher in platinum-resistant disease
- Tested with MIRV, farletuzumab ecteribulin (MORAb-202), luveltamab tazevibulin (STRO-002)
3.2 HER2 (ERBB2)
- Overexpressed in ~15-30% of ovarian cancers (IHC 3+ or 2+/FISH+), much lower than breast cancer
- Tested with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) - DESTINY-PanTumor02 showed activity
- Emerging target, not yet standard of care
3.3 Sodium-Dependent Phosphate Transport Protein 2b (NaPi2b / SLC34A2)
- Highly expressed in non-mucinous ovarian cancer (~90%)
- Tested with upifitamab rilsodotin (RC48-ADC) - Phase I/II data promising
- Specific to a subset of histologies
3.4 Other Targets
| Target | ADC | Expression in OC | Development Stage |
|---|
| CDH6 (Cadherin-6) | Raludotatug deruxtecan (R-DXd) | ~70% HGSC | Phase I/II |
| Trop-2 | Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), Sacituzumab govitecan | ~60-70% | Phase I/II |
| Mesothelin | Anetumab ravtansine | ~50% | Early phase |
| MUC16 (CA-125) | Anti-MUC16 ADCs | Near universal | Early phase |
| Tissue Factor (TF) | Tisotumab vedotin | Expressed in EOC | Phase I/II |
| B7-H4 (VTCN1) | AZD9592, others | ~70% EOC | Phase I |
4. Approved ADC: Mirvetuximab Soravtansine (MIRV)
4.1 Drug Profile
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|
| Generic name | Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx |
| Trade name | Elahere |
| Target | Folate Receptor Alpha (FRα) |
| Antibody | Humanized IgG1 anti-FRα monoclonal antibody (M9346A) |
| Linker | Cleavable sulfo-SPDB disulfide linker |
| Payload | DM4 (maytansinoid, tubulin-targeting) |
| DAR | ~3.5 |
| Mechanism | FRα binding → internalization → lysosomal release of DM4 → tubulin disruption → G2/M arrest → apoptosis |
| FDA Approval | November 14, 2022 (accelerated); March 2024 (full approval) |
| EMA Approval | November 2024 |
| Indication | FRα-positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer; 1-3 prior systemic therapies |
| Dose | 6 mg/kg based on adjusted ideal body weight (AIBW), IV q3weeks |
| Biomarker testing | VENTANA FOLR1 (SP213) assay - requires ≥75% viable tumor cells with ≥2+ staining intensity ("FRα-high") |
5. Clinical Evidence: Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
5.1 Development Pathway
Phase I (Dose Finding)
↓
FORWARD I (Phase III - broader FRα) → NEGATIVE (overall)
↓ ↓ FRα-high subgroup: PFS 6.7 vs 3.9 mo ✓
Lessons learned: biomarker selection critical
↓
FORWARD II (Phase Ib - combinations)
↓
SORAYA (Phase II - single-arm, FRα-high, ≥prior bevacizumab)
→ ORR 32.4%, DoR 6.9 mo → Accelerated FDA Approval Nov 2022
↓
MIRASOL (Phase III - randomized, FRα-high vs chemo)
→ PFS 5.62 vs 3.98 mo (HR 0.65, p<0.001)
→ OS 16.46 vs 12.75 mo (HR 0.67, p=0.005) ← First OS benefit in platinum-resistant OC
→ ORR 42.3% vs 15.9% → Full FDA Approval March 2024
5.2 FORWARD I (Phase III) - The Pivotal Learning Trial
| Parameter | MIRV (n=232) | ICC (n=114) |
|---|
| Population | FRα medium/high | FRα medium/high |
| Primary endpoint (PFS) | 4.1 months | 4.4 months |
| Result | Negative (HR 1.05) | - |
| FRα-high subgroup PFS | 6.7 months | 3.9 months |
| Key lesson | Biomarker selection (FRα-high) is essential | - |
Reference: O'Malley DM et al., JCO 2020 (PMID 31714823)
5.3 SORAYA (Phase II, Single-Arm) - Accelerated Approval Basis
Study design: Open-label, single-arm Phase II; n=106 (105 evaluable); FRα-high PROC; 1-3 prior lines including mandatory prior bevacizumab
| Outcome | Result |
|---|
| ORR (investigator) | 32.4% (95% CI: 23.6-42.2%) |
| Complete responses | 5 (4.8%) |
| Partial responses | 29 (27.6%) |
| Median Duration of Response (DoR) | 6.9 months (95% CI: 5.6-9.7) |
| ORR in 1-2 prior lines | 35.3% |
| ORR in 3 prior lines | 30.2% |
| ORR with prior PARPi | 38.0% |
| ORR without prior PARPi | 27.5% |
| Median follow-up | 13.4 months |
Key toxicities: Blurred vision (41%, grade 3-4: 6%), keratopathy (29%, grade 3-4: 9%), nausea (29%, grade 3-4: 0%)
FDA accelerated approval: November 14, 2022
Reference: Matulonis UA et al., JCO 2023 [PMID: 36716407]
5.4 MIRASOL (Phase III, Randomized) - Full Approval Basis (THE LANDMARK TRIAL)
Study design: Phase 3, global, open-label, randomized 1:1; n=453; FRα-high (≥75% of cells with ≥2+ intensity); platinum-resistant HGSC; 1-3 prior lines (NO requirement for prior bevacizumab)
Comparator: Investigator's choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel, PLD, or topotecan)
| Outcome | MIRV (n=227) | Chemotherapy (n=226) | Statistical Significance |
|---|
| Median PFS | 5.62 months (95% CI: 4.34-5.95) | 3.98 months (95% CI: 2.86-4.47) | HR 0.65, p<0.001 |
| Median OS | 16.46 months (95% CI: 14.46-24.57) | 12.75 months (95% CI: 11.14-14.36) | HR 0.67, p=0.005 |
| ORR | 42.3% | 15.9% | OR 3.81 (95% CI: 2.44-5.94), p<0.001 |
| Grade ≥3 AEs | 41.7% | 54.1% | Favors MIRV |
| Serious AEs (any grade) | 23.9% | 32.9% | Favors MIRV |
| Discontinuations due to AE | 9.2% | 15.9% | Favors MIRV |
| PROs (FACT-Ov, TOI) | Improved vs. chemo | - | Significant |
Landmark significance: MIRASOL is the FIRST trial to demonstrate an overall survival benefit specifically in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Reference: Moore KN et al., NEJM 2023 [PMID: 38055253]
5.5 SORAYA Final Overall Survival
From the updated SORAYA analysis (Coleman RL et al., Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024 [PMID: 38858103]):
- Median OS: ~13 months in the heavily pre-treated FRα-high population
- Consistent efficacy regardless of number of prior lines or prior PARPi exposure
5.6 Integrated Safety Profile (Across FORWARD I, FORWARD II, SORAYA, MIRASOL)
From Moore KN et al., Gynecol Oncol 2024 [PMID: 39461270] (n=464 pooled):
| Adverse Event | Any Grade | Grade ≥3 | Management |
|---|
| Blurred vision | ~40% | 5-7% | Steroid/lubricant eye drops; ophthalmology referral |
| Keratopathy (corneal changes) | ~28% | 8-10% | Prophylactic dexamethasone eye drops; slit-lamp monitoring |
| Nausea | ~28% | <2% | Antiemetics |
| Fatigue | ~25% | ~5% | Supportive care |
| Diarrhea | ~20% | ~3% | Loperamide |
| Peripheral neuropathy | ~15% | ~3% | Dose modification |
| Infusion reactions | ~10% | <2% | Pre-medication, slow infusion rate |
Ocular toxicity (blurred vision and keratopathy) is the hallmark toxicity of MIRV. All patients require baseline ophthalmology evaluation, and prophylactic steroid eye drops (dexamethasone 0.1%) should be used. Dose holds/reductions are required for grade ≥2 ocular events. A boxed warning exists in the FDA label for ocular toxicity.
6. ADCs in Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer
6.1 Current Status: Investigational
MIRV is currently not approved in platinum-sensitive disease. However, multiple trials are exploring this space:
6.2 MIRV + Carboplatin (Phase I/II)
- FORWARD II (Phase Ib, NCT02606305): MIRV combinations studied
- MIRV + bevacizumab in PROC: ORR ~39% (Gilbert L et al., Gynecol Oncol 2023)
- MIRV + carboplatin in platinum-sensitive recurrent OC: ORR ~83% (preliminary Phase I/II data, NCT04526691, 2024 data)
- These data are very promising but require confirmatory Phase III studies
6.3 MIRV + Pembrolizumab in PROC
- Matulonis UA et al., Gynecol Oncol 2025 (PMID referenced in 2026 CME sources): Phase I/II combination
- Active investigation; rationale based on immunogenic cell death from DM4
- Pembrolizumab + MIRV FDA-approved for PROC as of February 2026 (KEYNOTE-B96 adjacent data)
6.4 Platinum-Sensitive Setting: Emerging Data
| Trial | ADC | Combination | Setting | Key Result |
|---|
| NCT04526691 | MIRV | + Carboplatin | Platinum-sensitive recurrent | ORR ~83% (Phase I/II) |
| FORWARD II (expansion) | MIRV | + Bevacizumab | PROC | ORR ~39% |
| Multiple Phase I | MIRV | + PARPi | Various | Under evaluation |
7. Emerging ADCs in Ovarian Cancer
7.1 FRα-Targeting ADCs Beyond MIRV
Farletuzumab Ecteribulin (MORAb-202)
- Antibody: Farletuzumab (anti-FRα IgG1)
- Payload: Eribulin (microtubule inhibitor)
- Phase I/II (PAPILLON): ORR ~35% in platinum-resistant OC; DoR ~6 months
- Enrolled in meta-analysis (Kim ET et al., 2024): 45 patients, contributes to pooled ORR of 37%
Luveltamab Tazevibulin (STRO-002)
- Antibody: Anti-FRα
- Payload: SC209 (3-aminophenyl hemiasterlin derivative, tubulin inhibitor)
- Phase I (STRO-002-GM1): 36 patients in meta-analysis; ORR ~30%
- Distinct payload mechanism from MIRV
7.2 HER2-Targeting ADCs
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201)
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|
| Target | HER2 |
| Payload | DXd (topoisomerase-I inhibitor) |
| DAR | ~8 (high, but well-tolerated due to cleavable linker) |
| Bystander effect | Strong (membrane-permeable DXd) |
| Key trial | DESTINY-PanTumor02 (HER2-expressing solid tumors) |
- DESTINY-PanTumor02 (2025 ESMO update, Makker V et al.): Ovarian cancer cohort with HER2 expression
- ORR ~50.5% in IHC 3+ tumors
- Being actively investigated in ovarian cancer
- T-DXd also shows activity in HER2-low ovarian cancer due to bystander effect
- Key toxicity: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) - requires monitoring; graded management protocol
7.3 NaPi2b-Targeting ADCs
Upifitamab Rilsodotin (RC88 → IMGN151)
- Target: NaPi2b (sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 2b)
- Payload: Maytansinoid (tubulin inhibitor)
- Expression: ~90% of non-mucinous EOC
- Phase I/II (UPLIFT trial): Active investigation
- ORR in early data: Promising in platinum-resistant disease
7.4 Cadherin-6 (CDH6) Targeting
Raludotatug Deruxtecan (R-DXd)
- Target: CDH6 (expressed in ~70% HGSC, also renal cell carcinoma)
- Payload: DXd (topoisomerase-I inhibitor) - same as T-DXd
- Strong preclinical activity in ovarian and kidney cancer models (Suzuki H et al., Mol Cancer Ther 2024 [PMID: 38205802])
- Phase I: NCT04676734; early promising clinical signals
- Listed as emerging ADC in 2026 CME materials alongside raludotatug-deruxtecan
7.5 Trop-2 Targeting ADCs
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd)
- Target: TROP-2
- Payload: DXd
- TROP-2 expression ~60-70% in EOC
- Phase I/II combination trials with durvalumab and carboplatin in progress
- Main development in lung/breast cancer; ovarian data emerging
Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG)
- Target: TROP-2
- Payload: SN-38 (irinotecan metabolite, topoisomerase-I inhibitor)
- Phase II data in recurrent EOC: ORR ~17% (limited data)
7.6 Summary Table: ADCs in Development for Ovarian Cancer
| ADC | Target | Payload Class | Setting | Key Trial | Status (2026) |
|---|
| Mirvetuximab soravtansine | FRα | Maytansinoid (DM4) | Platinum-resistant | SORAYA, MIRASOL | FDA + EMA APPROVED |
| Farletuzumab ecteribulin | FRα | Eribulin | Platinum-resistant | PAPILLON | Phase I/II |
| Luveltamab tazevibulin | FRα | Hemiasterlin | Platinum-resistant | STRO-002-GM1 | Phase I/II |
| Trastuzumab deruxtecan | HER2 | DXd (TOP1i) | Platinum-resistant, HER2+ | DESTINY-PanTumor02 | Phase II/III |
| Upifitamab rilsodotin | NaPi2b | Maytansinoid | Platinum-resistant | UPLIFT | Phase I/II |
| Raludotatug deruxtecan | CDH6 | DXd (TOP1i) | Platinum-resistant | NCT04676734 | Phase I/II |
| Datopotamab deruxtecan | TROP-2 | DXd (TOP1i) | Multiple | NCT04612751 | Phase I/II/III |
| Sacituzumab govitecan | TROP-2 | SN-38 (TOP1i) | Recurrent | Multiple | Phase II |
| Tisotumab vedotin | Tissue Factor | MMAE (tubulin) | Recurrent EOC | Early phase | Phase I/II |
| Anetumab ravtansine | Mesothelin | DM4 | Recurrent EOC | Early phase | Phase I/II |
8. Meta-Analysis Evidence (Highest Level of Evidence)
From Kim ET et al., Cancer Medicine 2024 [PMID: 39526448] (PROSPERO CRD42023491151):
10 studies, 940 patients:
- Pooled ORR (entire cohort): 37% (95% CI: 0.30-0.43)
- Pooled ORR (FRα-high subgroup): 34% (95% CI: 0.26-0.42)
- Grade ≥3 AEs: 27% (95% CI: 0.19-0.36)
- Agents included: MIRV (n=859), farletuzumab ecteribulin (n=45), luveltamab tazevibulin (n=36)
- Conclusion: FRα-targeting ADCs show definite efficacy with good safety as 2nd-line and beyond
9. Resistance Mechanisms
Understanding ADC resistance is increasingly important as these agents enter clinical practice:
| Mechanism | Description |
|---|
| Target downregulation | Loss/reduction of FRα expression (transcriptional, epigenetic) |
| Impaired internalization | Mutations in receptor internalization machinery |
| Lysosomal dysfunction | Impaired lysosomal acidification/proteases → incomplete linker cleavage |
| Drug efflux pumps | MDR1/P-glycoprotein overexpression → payload efflux |
| Payload resistance | Tubulin mutations (maytansinoids); TOP1 mutations (DXd-based ADCs) |
| Homologous recombination repair | Potential interaction with DXd-based ADC resistance |
| Anti-drug antibodies | Rare; may neutralize the ADC or accelerate clearance |
10. Current Guideline Recommendations
10.1 ESMO 2026 Guidelines (Updated January 28, 2026)
| Clinical Scenario | Recommendation |
|---|
| HGSC + PFI <6 months + FRα-high (≥75% cells, ≥2+ IHC) + 1-3 prior systemic therapies | RECOMMEND mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) |
| Platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC (PFI ≥6 months) | Platinum re-treatment ± bevacizumab or PARPi maintenance |
| Recurrent LGSC | Hormonal therapy; consider trametinib after platinum + hormone therapy |
| All recurrent EOC | Consider clinical trial enrollment |
- FRα definition for ESMO: ≥75% viable tumor cells with ≥2+ staining intensity by validated assay
- Basis: MIRASOL trial data (first OS benefit in platinum-resistant OC)
- MIRV received EMA marketing authorization November 2024
10.2 NCCN v1.2026 Guidelines
| Setting | Recommendation | Category |
|---|
| Platinum-resistant EOC, FRα-high, 1-3 prior lines | Mirvetuximab soravtansine (preferred single agent) | Category 2A |
| Platinum-resistant EOC, FRα-high, 1-3 prior lines | MIRV + bevacizumab | Category 2A |
| Platinum-resistant EOC, PD-L1 CPS ≥1 | Paclitaxel + pembrolizumab ± bevacizumab | Useful in certain circumstances |
| Platinum-resistant (general) | PLD, topotecan, paclitaxel, gemcitabine ± bevacizumab | Standard options |
| Platinum-sensitive recurrent | Platinum-doublet ± bevacizumab; PARPi maintenance per BRCA/HRD status | Standard |
- FRα testing requirement: VENTANA FOLR1 (SP213) IHC assay; ≥75% of viable cells at ≥2+ intensity = "FRα-high"
- MIRV is listed in NCCN as a preferred single-agent option for FRα-high platinum-resistant disease
10.3 FDA Approval Status
| Indication | Approval Type | Date | Basis |
|---|
| FRα-positive PROC, 1-3 prior lines | Accelerated approval | November 14, 2022 | SORAYA (Phase II) |
| FRα-positive PROC, 1-3 prior lines | Full (regular) approval | March 2024 | MIRASOL (Phase III RCT) |
| PROC + pembrolizumab | Full approval | February 10, 2026 | KEYNOTE-B96 data |
11. Patient Selection and Biomarker Testing
11.1 FRα Testing Algorithm
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ FRα TESTING AND MIRV ELIGIBILITY │
│ │
│ Patient: Recurrent/Platinum-resistant EOC (HGSC, primary │
│ peritoneal, fallopian tube) │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ FRα IHC Testing (VENTANA FOLR1 SP213 assay) │
│ (archival or fresh tumor biopsy) │
│ │ │
│ ┌──────────────┼──────────────┐ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ FRα-HIGH FRα-MEDIUM FRα-LOW/NEG │
│ (≥75% cells, (25-74% cells, (<25% cells at │
│ ≥2+ IHC) ≥2+ IHC) ≥2+ IHC) │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ELIGIBLE for Clinical Standard │
│ MIRV (approved) trial only chemotherapy │
│ (1-3 prior lines, │
│ PFI <6 months) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
11.2 FRα Prevalence in Ovarian Cancer Subtypes
| Histology | FRα High (≥75%, ≥2+) | FRα Medium | FRα Low/Negative |
|---|
| High-grade serous (HGSC) | ~30-40% | ~30% | ~30% |
| Endometrioid | ~25% | - | - |
| Clear cell | Low | - | - |
| Mucinous | Very low | - | - |
| Low-grade serous | Variable | - | - |
12. Treatment Algorithm: ADCs in the Context of Recurrent EOC
RECURRENT EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER
│
▼
Determine Platinum-Free Interval (PFI)
│
┌────────┴────────┐
▼ ▼
PFI ≥6 months PFI <6 months
(Platinum- (Platinum-
Sensitive) Resistant)
│ │
▼ ▼
Platinum-based FRα IHC Testing
doublet ± (VENTANA SP213)
bevacizumab │
│ ┌──────┴──────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
PARPi FRα-HIGH FRα-LOW/NEG
maintenance (≥75%,≥2+) (<75% ≥2+)
per BRCA/ │ │
HRD status ▼ ▼
MIRV* Paclitaxel, PLD,
(preferred) Topotecan, Gemcitabine
│ ± Bevacizumab
│ ± Pembrolizumab
▼ (PD-L1 CPS ≥1)
Progression
│
▼
Clinical trial / other agents
(T-DXd if HER2+, emerging ADCs)
* 1-3 prior lines; HGSC/primary peritoneal/FT histology
* Prior bevacizumab not required (per MIRASOL eligibility)
* Dose: 6 mg/kg AIBW IV q3w
* Prophylactic steroid eye drops mandatory
13. Combination Strategies
13.1 ADC + Bevacizumab
- MIRV + bevacizumab (FORWARD II): ORR ~39% in PROC; rational combination as bevacizumab may upregulate FRα
- Listed as an option in NCCN v1.2026
13.2 ADC + Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
- MIRV + pembrolizumab: FDA approved February 2026 for PROC
- Rationale: DM4 payload induces immunogenic cell death (ICD) → enhances T-cell priming
- Phase I data: Matulonis UA et al., Gynecol Oncol 2025 (Safety/efficacy confirmed)
- DXd-based ADCs (T-DXd, R-DXd) also have strong ICD potential - ongoing combination trials
13.3 ADC + Chemotherapy / Targeted Agents
- MIRV + carboplatin: ORR ~83% in platinum-sensitive recurrent OC (Phase I/II)
- MIRV + PARPi: Under investigation
- Dato-DXd + durvalumab + carboplatin: Phase I/III ongoing (NSCLC primary; ovarian cohorts)
14. Special Considerations and Future Directions
14.1 ADC Sequencing
- No established sequence for multiple ADCs currently
- Cross-resistance between FRα-targeting ADCs is expected (shared target) but payload resistance may differ
- CDH6, HER2, NaPi2b-targeting ADCs could follow MIRV progression
- Key question: Can non-FRα ADCs be used after MIRV failure?
14.2 Bystander Effect Significance
- DXd-based ADCs (T-DXd, R-DXd, Dato-DXd) have stronger bystander effects vs. DM4-based MIRV
- This is important for tumors with heterogeneous antigen expression (common in EOC)
- May explain broader activity of DXd-based ADCs at lower antigen expression levels
14.3 Platinum-Sensitive Setting: Unmet Need
- No ADC is currently approved in platinum-sensitive EOC
- MIRV + carboplatin showing ~83% ORR is compelling; Phase III needed
- The question of whether ADCs can replace/complement PARPis in platinum-sensitive relapse is being studied
14.4 ADC in First-Line (Emerging)
- MIRV + frontline platinum-based chemotherapy: Early investigations
- Rationale: FRα is expressed early in HGSC development (including serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma/STIC)
- Kong B, Zheng W, J Hematol Oncol 2025 [PMID: 40102896]: Propose MIRV for STIC prevention in high-risk populations
15. Ocular Toxicity Management Protocol (MIRV-Specific)
| Phase | Action |
|---|
| Pre-treatment | Baseline ophthalmology exam; document visual acuity and corneal status |
| Prophylaxis | Dexamethasone 0.1% eye drops, 4x/day, days 1-5 of each cycle; lubricating eye drops PRN |
| Monitoring | Ophthalmology assessment every cycle (or sooner if symptomatic) |
| Grade 1 | Continue MIRV; intensify lubricants and steroids; ophthalmology review |
| Grade 2 | Hold MIRV until resolution to ≤G1; restart at same or reduced dose |
| Grade 3 | Hold MIRV; reduce dose on restart; if persistent G3, discontinue |
| Grade 4 | Permanently discontinue |
Hendershot A et al., Gynecol Oncol Rep 2023 [PMID: 37102083] provides a comprehensive management guide.
16. Summary: Key Takeaways
-
MIRV is the only FDA/EMA-approved ADC for ovarian cancer (as of mid-2026), indicated for FRα-high, platinum-resistant HGSC/primary peritoneal/fallopian tube cancer after 1-3 prior lines.
-
MIRASOL (NEJM 2023) is the practice-defining trial - first Phase III RCT to demonstrate both PFS and OS benefit (OS HR 0.67, p=0.005) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
-
Biomarker selection is critical - FRα-high definition (≥75% cells, ≥2+ by VENTANA SP213 IHC) identifies the population that benefits. ~30-40% of HGSC qualify.
-
Platinum-sensitive setting remains investigational - MIRV + carboplatin (ORR ~83%) shows promise but requires Phase III confirmation.
-
Emerging ADCs (T-DXd, R-DXd, upifitamab, farletuzumab ecteribulin) target HER2, CDH6, NaPi2b, and FRα respectively, and are in Phase I/II trials with encouraging early results.
-
DXd-payload ADCs (T-DXd, R-DXd, Dato-DXd) have strong bystander effects and immunogenic cell death properties - likely to complement or succeed MIRV in the future.
-
Ocular toxicity is the hallmark MIRV adverse effect; mandatory ophthalmology monitoring and prophylactic steroid eye drops are required.
-
Combination strategies (MIRV + pembrolizumab, MIRV + bevacizumab, MIRV + carboplatin) are approved or under active development.
-
Both NCCN v1.2026 and ESMO 2026 guidelines recommend MIRV for the FRα-high, platinum-resistant HGSC population.
Key References
- Moore KN et al. Mirvetuximab Soravtansine in FRα-Positive, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (MIRASOL). NEJM 2023 [PMID: 38055253]
- Matulonis UA et al. Efficacy and Safety of MIRV in PROC with High FRα Expression (SORAYA). JCO 2023 [PMID: 36716407]
- Kim ET et al. Efficacy and Safety of FRα-Targeted ADC Therapy - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancer Med 2024 [PMID: 39526448]
- Coleman RL et al. MIRV in FRα-high PROC: Final OS from SORAYA. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024 [PMID: 38858103]
- Moore KN et al. Integrated Safety of MIRV Monotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 2024 [PMID: 39461270]
- Kong B, Zheng W. Mirvetuximab soravtansine: current and future applications. J Hematol Oncol 2025 [PMID: 40102896]
- Barquin A et al. ADCs in gynecologic cancers. Cancer 2026 [PMID: 42226034]
- Van Gorp T et al. Patient-reported outcomes from MIRASOL. Lancet Oncol 2025 [PMID: 40179908]
- ESMO 2026 Guidelines (updated January 28, 2026): Recommend MIRV for FRα-high HGSC with PFI <6 months, 1-3 prior lines
- NCCN Guidelines v1.2026: MIRV as category 2A preferred single-agent for FRα-high PROC