Hollow viscus perforation for md emergency medicine
hollow viscus perforation emergency medicine review causes diagnosis management 2024
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11561333
"hollow viscus" perforation AND "emergency" AND management
| Cause | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) | Most common overall - duodenal > gastric ulcers; NSAID use, H. pylori, steroids |
| Perforated appendix | Common in younger patients; leading cause by some series |
| Typhoid perforation | Ileal Peyer's patches; 2nd-3rd week of illness |
| Diverticular perforation | Sigmoid colon; elderly; Hinchey classification |
| Malignancy | Gastric/colonic carcinoma; lymphoma (esp. after chemotherapy) |
| Crohn's disease | Transmural inflammation; any segment |
| Iatrogenic | Colonoscopy, endoscopy, Foley catheter |
| Trauma | Blunt (seat belt injury) or penetrating (stab/gunshot) |
| Ischemic bowel | Vascular occlusion, strangulated hernia |
| Tuberculosis | Terminal ileum |
| Toxic megacolon | Ulcerative colitis, C. difficile |
| Sign | Significance |
|---|---|
| Board-like (wooden) rigidity | Generalized peritonitis; involuntary guarding |
| Rebound tenderness (Blumberg's sign) | Peritoneal irritation |
| Absent bowel sounds | Ileus/peritonitis |
| Tachycardia, hypotension | Early septic shock |
| Obliteration of liver dullness | Free air under diaphragm (pneumoperitoneum) |
| Tenderness on rectal exam | Pelvic peritonitis |
| Shoulder tip pain | Diaphragmatic irritation from free air/fluid |
Elderly patients may not have dramatic pain or impressive peritoneal findings - Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine. Maintain a high index of suspicion.
| Test | Purpose |
|---|---|
| CBC | Leukocytosis (WBC >12,000) - infection/peritonitis |
| Serum electrolytes, BUN, creatinine | Dehydration, renal function |
| Liver function tests | Hepatic cause, biliary perforation |
| Serum amylase/lipase | Distinguish pancreatitis |
| Blood glucose | Sepsis response |
| Serum lactate | Severity of shock; >4 mmol/L = severe sepsis |
| Blood cultures (x2) | Pre-antibiotic, guide therapy |
| Coagulation profile (PT/INR) | DIC assessment |
| Type and cross-match | Surgical preparation |
| Condition | Distinguishing Feature |
|---|---|
| Acute pancreatitis | Very high amylase/lipase; CT shows pancreatic changes |
| Mesenteric ischemia | Severe pain out of proportion; lactate elevated |
| Aortic aneurysm rupture | Pulsatile mass; hypotension; CT angiography |
| Acute appendicitis (early) | RIF pain; no free air on X-ray |
| Ruptured ectopic pregnancy | Female; positive beta-hCG; adnexal tenderness |
| Bowel obstruction | Distension; air-fluid levels; no free air initially |
| Acute cholecystitis | RUQ pain; Murphy's sign; ultrasound findings |
| Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis | Cirrhotic patient; ascites; no free air |
| Drug | Dose / Notes |
|---|---|
| Broad-spectrum IV antibiotics | Start IMMEDIATELY (do not wait for cultures); within 1 hour if septic shock |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 4.5g IV q8h - covers gram-negatives + anaerobes |
| Ceftriaxone + Metronidazole | Alternative; covers gram-negatives + anaerobes |
| Meropenem | If resistant organisms suspected or severe sepsis |
| IV PPI (omeprazole/pantoprazole) | 80mg IV bolus then 8 mg/hr infusion - for PUD perforation |
| Tetanus prophylaxis | If traumatic perforation |
| Vasopressors (norepinephrine) | If fluid-refractory shock; target MAP >65 mmHg |
Free air on radiograph + peritonitis + appropriate history = broad-spectrum antibiotics + prompt surgical consultation - Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine.
| Perforation Site | Surgical Approach |
|---|---|
| Perforated duodenal/gastric ulcer | Graham's omental patch repair (most common); laparoscopic approach increasingly used |
| Perforated appendix | Appendicectomy (open or laparoscopic) |
| Diverticular perforation | Hartmann's procedure (sigmoid colostomy + rectal stump); primary anastomosis in selected cases |
| Small bowel perforation | Resection + primary anastomosis or temporary stoma |
| Iatrogenic/small contained | Laparoscopic repair + peritoneal washout |
| Colonic perforation | Resection + colostomy (most cases) |
| Factor | Impact |
|---|---|
| Age >50 years | Higher mortality |
| Delay in presentation (>24 hrs) | Significantly increases mortality |
| Fecal contamination (colonic) | Worst prognosis |
| Hemodynamic instability | Poor outcome |
| Comorbidities (DM, immunosuppression) | Higher mortality |
| Perforation site | Gastric/duodenal < small bowel < colonic |