Definition of anosmia parosmia with examples

Reading File
Searching the Web

anosmia parosmia definition examples causes 2024

Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Here is a thorough breakdown of both terms, drawn from authoritative medical textbooks and current clinical sources.

Anosmia

Definition: Anosmia is the complete absence of the sense of smell - the total inability to detect any odors. It is the most frequent clinical abnormality of olfaction.
A related term, hyposmia (or microsmia), refers to a reduced (but not absent) ability to smell. Functional anosmia specifically means olfactory function is so diminished that it provides no useful input in daily life, even if trace detection remains.
"Anosmia - absence of all olfactory function."
  • Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Table 36.1

Examples of Anosmia:

CauseExample
Viral infectionCOVID-19, influenza, herpes - damage to olfactory neuroepithelium causes sudden onset loss of smell
Head traumaA blow to the head tears olfactory filaments passing through the cribriform plate
Nasal obstructionSevere nasal polyps or chronic rhinosinusitis block odorant access to the olfactory cleft
Neurodegenerative diseaseAnosmia is an early sign in Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease - Lewy body pathology begins in olfactory structures
CongenitalKallmann syndrome (absence of the olfactory bulbs); patients never develop sense of smell
ToxicProlonged exposure to organic solvents, aminoglycosides, cocaine overuse
MetabolicThiamine deficiency, thyroid or adrenal insufficiency, renal failure, cirrhosis
"Unilateral anosmia can sometimes be demonstrated... if unilateral, usually is not recognized by the patient."
  • Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology, 12th Ed.

Parosmia

Definition: Parosmia (also called dysosmia, cacosmia, troposmia, or euosmia) is a qualitative distortion of smell - an odor stimulus is present, but the brain perceives it incorrectly, usually as unpleasant. It is not a hallucination (there IS a real odor stimulus), but the perceived quality of that odor is distorted.
"Parosmia - qualitative dysfunction in the presence of an odorant (i.e., distorted perception of an odor stimulus)."
  • Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Table 36.1
"These terms refer to distortions of odor perception where an odor is present... parosmia is in the nature of an olfactory illusion."
  • Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology, 12th Ed.

Examples of Parosmia:

Real OdorWhat the Patient Perceives
Fresh coffee brewingRotten garbage or burnt rubber
Banana or fresh fruitRotting flesh
A loved one's perfumeA foul chemical smell
Freshly baked cookiesSomething spoiled or sewage-like
Grilled meatPetrol or motor oil
ToothpasteChemical or toxic smell
The distortion is almost always in an unpleasant direction - neutral or pleasant odors are perceived as offensive or repulsive.
"Often mistaking pleasant or neutral odors for unpleasant ones."
  • KJ Lee's Essential Otolaryngology
"For instance, warm cookies from the oven - which smell sweet and delicious to most people - might smell unpleasant and rotten to people with parosmia."

Causes of Parosmia:

  • Post-infectious (most common today): COVID-19, upper respiratory infections - parosmia typically starts 1-3 months after the infection, often as olfaction is beginning to recover
  • Head injury with partial damage to olfactory bulbs
  • Psychiatric conditions: Severe depression and psychosis - patients may report all food smells unbearable (termed cacosmia), often accompanied by taste distortion (cacogeusia)
  • Nasal sinus infections and chronic rhinosinusitis
  • Partial nerve recovery: Incomplete regrowth of olfactory sensory neurons causes "miswiring" and distorted signal encoding - like a piano with some strings cut, producing a discordant sound instead of a pleasant one

Pathophysiology of Parosmia:

The leading theory: partial but incomplete loss of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) means some neurons survive but are miswired. The pattern of signals reaching the brain no longer matches the normal odor "map," so familiar smells are decoded incorrectly. Parosmia occurring during recovery from anosmia is actually considered a positive prognostic sign (the system is re-establishing connections), in contrast to phantosmia, which may indicate poor prognosis.

Related Olfactory Disorders (Comparison Table)

TermDefinitionStimulus present?
NormosmiaNormal smellYes
HyposmiaReduced smellYes
AnosmiaComplete loss of smellYes (undetected)
ParosmiaDistorted smell (illusion)Yes - perceived wrongly
PhantosmiaSmell without any stimulus (olfactory hallucination)No stimulus
HyperosmiaAbnormally heightened smell (rare; seen in migraine)Yes

Classification Framework

Adams and Victor classifies olfactory disturbances into four groups:
  1. Quantitative abnormalities - loss or reduction (anosmia, hyposmia)
  2. Qualitative abnormalities - distortions or illusions (parosmia/dysosmia)
  3. Olfactory hallucinations - from temporal lobe disorders or psychiatric disease (phantosmia, uncinate fits)
  4. Higher-order loss - olfactory agnosia (inability to recognize/name odors despite detecting them)
Sources: KJ Lee's Essential Otolaryngology; Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology, 12th Ed.; Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; Cleveland Clinic - Parosmia; Medical News Today - Anosmia

Find recent research on parosmia treatment options and outcomes

Searching PubMed

parosmia treatment outcomes

Searching PubMed

olfactory training parosmia COVID-19

Searching the Web

parosmia treatment 2024 2025 clinical trials olfactory training outcomes

Reading Article

PMID: 40465208

Reading Article

PMID: 40504522

Reading Article

PMID: 39477832

Reading Article

PMID: 39888025

Reading Web Page

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/scientists-sniff-out-co…

Excellent data. Here is a comprehensive synthesis of the current evidence on parosmia treatment.

Recent Research on Parosmia Treatment Options and Outcomes


1. Olfactory Training (OT) - First-Line Therapy

Olfactory training remains the most widely used and best-studied treatment. It involves sniffing 4 distinct odors (typically rose, eucalyptus, lemon, and clove) twice daily for at least 4-6 months.
Latest evidence:
  • A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis (Chen et al., Rhinology) pooled 9 studies covering 179 patients with chronic COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. It found significant post-training improvements in all dimensions of the Sniffin' Sticks test: threshold, discrimination, identification, and total TDI score - suggesting both top-down (central) and bottom-up (peripheral) mechanisms are involved. [PMID: 40465208]
  • However, a 2025 RCT (Rhinology) found patients who had smell problems for an extended time showed no difference vs. an odorless placebo after 12 weeks of training - suggesting timing of treatment is critical. Delayed treatment appears to reduce benefit.
  • Mayo Clinic data indicate OT alone recovers smell in ~26% of patients; combining OT with nasal steroid irrigation doubles recovery to ~50%.
Practical reality: Adherence is a major problem - surveys show 3 out of 4 patients give up within the first 4 weeks. Training is perceived as tedious.
Optimizing OT - emerging data: Research is now questioning the traditional 4-scent kit. Two separate 2025 studies (US and France) found that galaxolide (synthetic musk) and either geranyl acetate (floral) or benzothiazole (meat-like scent) may stimulate a broader range of olfactory receptors than the traditional rose/lemon kit. The two research teams are now collaborating on a revised clinical protocol.

2. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections - Promising Emerging Therapy

PRP (autologous growth factor-rich plasma injected into the olfactory cleft) has emerged as one of the most promising interventions.
Key studies:
  • Lechien & Saussez, 2025 (Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, [PMID: 39888025]) - the largest study to date: 514 COVID-19 patients at two centers compared PRP + OT vs. OT alone. Results:
    • All PRP subgroups (anosmia, hyposmia, parosmia) showed significantly higher TDI score increases than controls
    • Parosmia patients had greater quality-of-life improvement than other groups following PRP
    • Older age and longer duration of OD negatively predicted outcomes
    • Parosmia patients had the highest baseline burden on quality of life
  • Fieux et al., 2025 (Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, [PMID: 39740091]) - prospective cohort RCT on long-term outcomes of PRP for post-viral olfactory loss, further supporting the approach.
  • A phase 3 RCT (NCT07151703, Taiwan) is currently comparing intranasal injection vs. topical PRP delivery, with completion estimated in 2028.
Current barrier: PRP is expensive and not yet covered by most insurers.

3. Stellate Ganglion Block (SGB) - Does NOT Work

SGB (an anesthetic nerve block of the sympathetic ganglion in the neck) generated significant interest based on case reports and early pilot data.
Definitive RCT verdict: A landmark 2025 double-blind placebo-controlled RCT published in JAMA Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery (Farrell et al., Washington University) enrolled 57 patients with COVID-19-induced parosmia persisting at least 6 months.
  • 3-month response rate: 43% SGB vs. 38% placebo - no significant difference
  • No difference in clinical global impression of improvement
  • Conclusion: SGB is not superior to placebo and should NOT be recommended for COVID-19-induced parosmia [PMID: 40504522]
This effectively closes the door on SGB as a specific parosmia treatment.

4. Corticosteroids - Limited Evidence

A 2023 systematic review (Winn et al., PLoS One) assessed steroids vs. other medications for COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction and found mixed/low-certainty evidence. The 2024 systematic review by Bischoff et al. (Curr Allergy Asthma Rep) found corticosteroids did not show notable efficacy for COVID-19-related OD in their analysis of 36 RCTs and non-randomized studies. [PMID: 39477832]
  • Nasal steroid irrigation when combined with OT does boost recovery rates (Mayo Clinic data)
  • Oral/systemic steroids are no longer routinely recommended for post-infectious parosmia

5. Transcranial Electrical Stimulation - Exciting but Early

A 2025 Italian pilot study combined OT with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the prefrontal cortex in patients who had already failed steroids, supplements, and training:
  • 63% achieved complete recovery after 10 sessions over 2 weeks
  • The control group (sham stimulation) showed no such improvement
Experts call for larger, well-controlled trials before this becomes standard practice.

6. Other Agents - Mostly Ineffective or Unproven

AgentEvidence
Calcium chelators (sodium citrate)Showed some objective improvement in the 2024 systematic review
Vitamin A nasal dropsSome earlier positive data; not confirmed in controlled trials
Zinc supplementsNot verified; may interfere with copper absorption
Omega-3/Vitamin DUsed as adjuncts; limited controlled data
TheophyllineMinimal benefit in RCTs
Intranasal insulinMinimal benefit in RCTs
GabapentinLimited data
CerebrolysinLimited data
Biologic agents (mepolizumab, tezepelumab)Improve smell in CRS with nasal polyps specifically, not post-viral parosmia

7. Prognosis and Natural Recovery

  • Most post-COVID parosmia is temporary. The 2024 systematic review (Bischoff et al.) notes spontaneous recovery occurs in a significant proportion, making placebo-controlled trials essential for accurate assessment.
  • Parosmia appearing during recovery from anosmia is considered a positive prognostic indicator - it signals the olfactory system is regenerating.
  • Outcomes worsen significantly if treatment is delayed beyond 6 months (Mayo Clinic). Early referral is key.
  • Parosmia patients report disproportionately high quality-of-life burden - food aversion, weight loss, depression, and social anxiety are common.

Summary of Evidence Grades

TreatmentBest Evidence LevelVerdict
Olfactory training + nasal steroidsSystematic review + Meta-analysisRecommended first-line; ~50% response
PRP injection (olfactory cleft)Controlled clinical trial (n=514)Promising; not yet standard
Electrical stimulation (tDCS)Small RCTEarly promise; needs validation
Corticosteroids aloneSystematic reviewInsufficient evidence for post-viral
Stellate ganglion blockDouble-blind RCTNo benefit - not recommended
Vitamin/zinc supplementsRCTsNot supported
The field is moving fast, largely driven by the scale of post-COVID olfactory dysfunction. The current consensus: start OT early with nasal steroid irrigation, refer to a specialist at 6 months if no improvement, and consider PRP as an evidence-supported next step.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.