Harrison chapter 264,265 - heart failure:pathophysiology and diagnosis- clinical definition, epidemiology -add table 264-1 independent predictors of adverse outcomes in heart failure, phenotype and causes HF with reduced vs preserved EF, HF with recovered EF, HFmrEF, add table 264-2 selected causes of heart failure , acquired versus familial, congenital and other disorders ,, pathophysiology- progressive disease, vascular remodeling, mechanism of disease progression, neurohormonal activation, add figure 264-6 remodeling stimuli in heart failure, vasodilatory hormones,, endothelin, inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress, novel biological targets, Dyssynchrony and electrical instability ,secondary mitral regurgitation. Cardiorenal and abdominal interactions , Gut congestion, the microbiome, and inflammation , high output states . Evaluation- history - symptoms of congestion: pulmonary verses systemic, add table 264-4 nyhafc, symptoms of reduced perfusion, other symptoms, precipitating factors. Add table 264-5 precipitating factors in HF. Physical examination - general appearance, vital signs, jugular venous pulse, lung examination, cardiac examination, abdomen and extremities,, Diagnosis- routine laboratories, chest x ray ,ECG, noninvasive imaging, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, biomarker, invasive studies. Comorbidities- diabetes, sleep apnea,obesity,depression. Add Table 264-8 Dd of heart failure.Differencial diagnosis. Heart failure management- heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: general principles, clinical trails in hfpef, other therapeutic agents, add photo figure 265-1 and explained. Clinical guiding principles , acute decompesated HF, general principles, volume management - intravenous diuretics agent, the cardiorenal syndrome, ultrafiltration, vasoactive therapy, initropic therapy, other therapy of adhf, clinical guiding principles, HFrEF, add table 265-1 vasoactive therapy in adhf with all drug, neurohormonal antagonism, class effect and sequence of administration, dose and outcome, Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, RAAS therapy and neurohormal escape, alternative vasodilators, novel neurohormonal antagonists, add table 265-2 guidelines directed pharmacologic therapy and target doses of heart failure with reduced EF, heart rate modification, sglt-2 inhibition , soluble guanylyl cyclase stimulation, myosin activation, digoxin, oral diuretics,calcium channel antagonist, anti inflammatory therapy, HMG- CoA reductase inhibitors, anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, fish oil, micronutrients, enhanced external counterpulsation, exercise, management of selected comorbidity, neuro modulation using device therapy, cardiac contractility modulation. Cardiac resychronization therapy, sudden cardiac death prevention in HF, surgical therapy in HF, cellular and gene based care, disease management and supportive care. Make notes , if needed thn add flow chart

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Loading Image
Loading Image
Reading File
Loading Image
Reading File

HEART FAILURE: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis & Management

Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22E - Chapters 264 & 265


CHAPTER 264: HEART FAILURE - PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND DIAGNOSIS


I. CLINICAL DEFINITIONS, EPIDEMIOLOGY, AND PHENOTYPES

DEFINITIONS

Heart Failure (HF) = A complex clinical syndrome with symptoms and signs resulting from any structural or functional impairment of ventricular filling or ejection of blood. (AHA/ACC/HFSA)
ESC Definition emphasizes: cardinal symptoms (breathlessness, ankle swelling, fatigue) + signs (elevated JVP, pulmonary crackles, peripheral edema) due to structural/functional abnormality causing elevated intracardiac pressures and/or inadequate cardiac output.
Universal Definition (2021): Symptoms and/or signs caused by a structural and/or functional cardiac abnormality, corroborated by at least ONE of:
  • Elevated natriuretic peptide levels
  • Objective evidence of cardiogenic pulmonary or systemic congestion
Figure 264-1: Universal Definition of HF
Figure 264-1: The contemporary universal definition of HF. Diagnosis requires symptoms/signs of HF caused by a cardiac abnormality, corroborated by elevated natriuretic peptides OR objective evidence of congestion.
Key terminological distinctions:
  • Chronic HF = Longstanding (months-years) symptoms, on medical/device therapy; episodes of worsening = "decompensation"; resolution = "remission" (NOT stable, as risk persists)
  • Acute HF (previously ADHF) = Rapid onset or worsening of symptoms; 80% = worsening chronic HF, ~20% = new-onset (ACS, acute valvular dysfunction, hypertensive urgency, postcardiotomy)
  • Acute pulmonary edema = Rapidly worsening signs/symptoms of pulmonary congestion due to severe elevation of left heart filling pressures
  • Prefer "heart failure" over "congestive heart failure"; "cardiomyopathy/LV dysfunction" are broader terms

EPIDEMIOLOGY

  • US: ~6.7 million adults treated for HF; >600,000 new cases/year
  • Global: ~56.2 million people affected worldwide
  • Lifetime risk: ~20% for adults >45 years
  • Prognosis: ~50% 5-year mortality despite advances; significant morbidity and healthcare costs
  • HF is the leading cause of hospitalization in adults >65 years in the US
  • PAR by race/ethnicity (HFpEF): Hypertension predominates in all groups; obesity and diabetes are increasing contributors especially in Hispanic/African American populations

TABLE 264-1: INDEPENDENT PREDICTORS OF ADVERSE OUTCOMES IN HEART FAILURE

CategoryPredictor
DemographicOlder age, male sex, non-white race
ClinicalNYHA class III-IV, prior HF hospitalization, low 6-minute walk distance
Vital SignsHypotension, tachycardia, low pulse pressure
HemodynamicLow cardiac index, elevated PCWP, low mixed venous O₂ saturation
LaboratoryHyponatremia, worsening renal function (BUN/creatinine elevation), elevated bilirubin, anemia, hyperuricemia
BiomarkersElevated BNP/NTproBNP, elevated troponin, elevated ST2, elevated galectin-3
ImagingReduced LVEF, dilated LV, RV dysfunction, severe MR, pulmonary hypertension
ECGWide QRS (LBBB), atrial fibrillation
ComorbiditiesDiabetes mellitus, CKD, sleep apnea, depression

PHENOTYPES: HFrEF vs. HFpEF vs. HFmrEF vs. HFrecEF

HFrEF (Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction)
  • LVEF ≤40%
  • Systolic dysfunction is predominant
  • Evidence-based therapy most established
  • Causes: ischemic (most common), dilated, myocarditis, toxic
HFpEF (Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction)
  • LVEF ≥50%
  • Normal or near-normal systolic function; diastolic dysfunction predominant
  • Multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms: vascular stiffness, renal dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, insulin resistance
  • Comorbidities (HTN, obesity, DM, CKD, AF, sleep apnea) play major role
  • ~50% of all HF; prognosis comparable to HFrEF
  • Limited evidence-based therapy (SGLT-2i now proven beneficial)
HFmrEF (Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction)
  • LVEF 41-49%
  • Intermediate zone; heterogeneous population
  • Some may recover EF (overlap with HFrecEF)
  • SGLT-2i, ARNi show benefit in clinical trials
HFrecEF (Heart Failure with Recovered Ejection Fraction)
  • Previously HFrEF, now LVEF >40% (often ≥50%)
  • Following treatment (e.g., tachycardiomyopathy, peripartum CMP, toxic CMP)
  • Despite recovery, continued GDMT is recommended - discontinuation risks relapse
  • Better prognosis but NOT benign; residual risk persists

TABLE 264-2: SELECTED CAUSES OF HEART FAILURE

ACQUIRED CAUSES

CategoryExamples
IschemicCAD, MI, coronary microvascular disease
HypertensiveSystemic hypertension, hypertensive CMP
ValvularMR, AR, MS, AS, tricuspid disease
Inflammatory/InfectiousViral myocarditis (Coxsackievirus B, COVID-19, HIV), Chagas disease, Lyme disease, sepsis-related CMP
Toxic/Drug-InducedAlcohol, cocaine, methamphetamine, anthracyclines, trastuzumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, radiation
Metabolic/EndocrineThyroid disease (hypo/hyper), acromegaly, Cushing's, diabetes
Nutritional DeficiencyThiamine (beriberi), selenium, carnitine
Tachycardia-InducedAF, incessant SVT, frequent PVCs
PeripartumPeripartum cardiomyopathy
Stress-InducedTakotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy
Infiltrative (Acquired)Amyloidosis (AL), sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis

FAMILIAL/GENETIC CAUSES

CategoryExamples
Dilated CMP (familial)TTN (titin) mutations (most common), LMNA, SCN5A, MYH7
Hypertrophic CMPMYH7, MYBPC3, TNNT2 (sarcomere genes)
ARVCDesmosomal gene mutations (PKP2, DSP)
Muscular dystrophiesDuchenne, Becker (X-linked dystrophinopathy)
ChannelopathiesLong QT, Brugada syndrome
Storage/Infiltrative (Familial)ATTR amyloidosis (TTR mutations), Fabry's disease (GLA), Pompe disease

CONGENITAL AND OTHER DISORDERS

CategoryExamples
Congenital Heart DiseaseVSD, ASD (shunts), Ebstein's anomaly, complex CHD
High-Output StatesSevere anemia, AV fistula, thyrotoxicosis, Paget's disease, wet beriberi, pregnancy
Pericardial DiseaseConstrictive pericarditis (mimics HF)
RV FailurePulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary embolism, RV infarction

II. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

PROGRESSIVE DISEASE

HFrEF is a progressive disease involving an index event followed by months-to-years of structural and functional cardiovascular remodeling.
Index events may be:
  • Sudden (acute MI)
  • Gradual (chronic pressure/volume overload)
  • Inherited (genetic CMP)
  • Congenital
Patients may remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods due to compensatory mechanisms that ultimately contribute to disease progression.

VENTRICULAR REMODELING

Two patterns based on stimulus:
FeatureConcentric HypertrophyEccentric Hypertrophy
StimulusPressure overload (HTN, AS)Volume overload (AR, MR)
Mass vs VolumeMass > chamber volumeChamber volume increases
PurposeReduces wall stressAccommodates increased volume
OutcomeRisk of diastolic dysfunctionRisk of systolic dysfunction, dilated CMP
Cellular changes in remodeling:
  • Myocyte hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis
  • Alterations in calcium-handling proteins and cytoskeletal proteins
  • Molecular: re-expression of fetal genes
  • Cell loss: necrosis, apoptosis (programmed cell death)
  • Afterload mismatch from systemic vasoconstriction + loss of neurohormonal adaptation
  • Feeds back on remodeling stimuli - vicious cycle
HFpEF mechanisms (beyond diastolic dysfunction):
  • Vascular stiffness, renal dysfunction, sodium avidity
  • Inflammation related to regional adiposity
  • Oxidative stress, impaired nitric oxide signaling (nitrosative stress)
  • Insulin resistance
  • Autophagy dysfunction (autophagosomes - normally cytoprotective but unchecked = maladaptive)

FIGURE 264-6: REMODELING STIMULI IN HEART FAILURE

Figure 264-6
Remodeling stimuli (wall stress, cytokines, neurohormonal signals, oxidative stress) lead to myocyte hypertrophy, altered interstitial matrix, fetal gene expression, altered calcium-handling proteins, and myocyte death. These produce ventricular enlargement and systolic/diastolic dysfunction, which increases wall stress - completing a vicious cycle.

MECHANISMS OF DISEASE PROGRESSION

Neurohormonal Activation

Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) and RAAS are central drivers.
Initial compensation:
  • Increased HR, BP, contractility
  • Sodium/water retention to augment preload
  • Maintains CO at rest and during exercise
Chronic unchecked activation leads to:
  • Excessive vasoconstriction and volume retention
  • Electrolyte/renal abnormalities
  • Baroreceptor dysfunction
  • Direct myocardial toxicity (norepinephrine, angiotensin II)
  • Cardiac arrhythmias
  • Ventricular remodeling (heart + blood vessels)
Key neurohormonal mediators:
SystemEffects
SNS (NE elevation)Vasoconstriction, tachycardia, direct myocardial toxicity, arrhythmias
Angiotensin IIVasoconstriction, aldosterone release, myocardial fibrosis, hypertrophy
AldosteroneNa/water retention, K/Mg wasting, myocardial fibrosis
Vasopressin (ADH)Water retention, hyponatremia
Endothelin-1Potent vasoconstriction, myocyte hypertrophy, pulmonary vasoconstriction

Vasodilatory/Counter-Regulatory Hormones

Counter-regulatory mechanisms that are overwhelmed in HF:
  • Natriuretic peptides (ANP, BNP): Vasodilation, natriuresis, anti-fibrotic, anti-hypertrophic; levels rise with wall stress - used as biomarkers
  • Nitric oxide (NO): Vasodilation, anti-remodeling; impaired in HF (reduced NOS activity, increased ROS consumption)
  • Prostaglandins: Vasodilatory, renoprotective

Endothelin

  • ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor (>10x more potent than NE)
  • Stimulates myocyte hypertrophy, fibrosis, and pulmonary vasoconstriction
  • Elevated in proportion to HF severity
  • Endothelin antagonists tested but NOT effective in HF (actually worsened outcomes in some trials)

Inflammatory Cytokines and Oxidative Stress

  • TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6: Directly depress myocardial function; induce myocyte apoptosis; contribute to cardiac cachexia
  • Reactive oxygen species (ROS): Generated by xanthine oxidase, mitochondria, NADPH oxidase; cause protein oxidation, lipid peroxidation, DNA damage; impair myocyte function
  • MMP (matrix metalloproteinases): Degrade ECM; contribute to LV dilatation
  • Anti-cytokine therapy (e.g., etanercept, infliximab): NOT effective in HF trials

Novel Biological Targets

  • ST2 (IL-1 receptor family): Decoy receptor for IL-33; elevated ST2 predicts adverse outcomes
  • Galectin-3: Macrophage-derived; promotes fibrosis; elevated = poor prognosis
  • GDF-15: Stress-responsive cytokine; marker of metabolic stress
  • MicroRNAs: Gene regulatory molecules; potential therapeutic targets
  • SGLT-2 pathway: Beyond glycemic control - reduces preload/afterload, improves cardiac metabolism, reduces oxidative stress, has direct cardiac effects

Dyssynchrony and Electrical Instability

  • Dyssynchrony: Abnormal activation sequence (esp. with LBBB, QRS >150ms) leads to:
    • Paradoxical septal motion
    • Reduced mechanical efficiency
    • Secondary MR worsening
    • Further adverse remodeling
    • CRT reverses dyssynchrony and improves outcomes
  • Electrical Instability:
    • Remodeled heart has heterogeneous refractoriness → substrate for re-entry
    • HFrEF: 40-50% of deaths are sudden (VF/VT); risk highest in early disease
    • ICD therapy reduces SCD

Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

  • In dilated CMP: LV dilatation displaces papillary muscles laterally + tethers leaflets → incomplete coaptation
  • Annular dilatation from LV dilatation further worsens MR
  • Creates a vicious cycle: MR → more volume overload → more dilatation → worse MR
  • Functional/secondary MR carries poor prognosis
  • Guideline-directed therapy (GDMT) can reduce secondary MR; surgical repair in selected cases (MITRA-FR vs. COAPT trial controversy)

Cardiorenal and Abdominal Interactions

  • Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS):
    • Low forward CO → reduced renal perfusion → prerenal azotemia
    • High venous pressure → elevated renal venous pressure → reduced filtration gradient → worsening renal function
    • Neurohormonal activation (RAAS, SNS) → renal vasoconstriction
    • Type 1 CRS: Acute worsening of HF causes acute kidney injury
    • Type 2 CRS: Chronic HF causes progressive CKD
  • Abdominal congestion: Elevated venous pressure → gut wall edema → impaired absorption → malnutrition

Gut Congestion, Microbiome, and Inflammation

  • Gut congestion → increased intestinal permeability → translocation of bacterial products (lipopolysaccharide = LPS/endotoxin)
  • Endotoxemia → systemic inflammation → worsening HF (cytokine storm)
  • Gut microbiome alterations in HF:
    • Reduced microbial diversity
    • Overgrowth of pathogenic species
    • Altered bile acid metabolism
    • Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO): gut microbiome-derived metabolite; elevated in HF → platelet aggregation, atherosclerosis, worsening cardiorenal function
  • Active area of investigation for microbiome-targeted therapies

High-Output States

  • Characterized by elevated CO (>8 L/min) with reduced SVR despite normal or increased contractility
  • The heart fails to keep up with elevated metabolic demand
  • Causes:
    • Severe anemia (Hgb <5 g/dL)
    • AV fistulae (acquired or dialysis access)
    • Thyrotoxicosis
    • Paget's disease of bone (extensive)
    • Wet beriberi (thiamine deficiency)
    • Pregnancy/cirrhosis/obesity
  • Characteristics: Wide pulse pressure, bounding pulses, warm extremities, normal or elevated EF
  • Treatment: directed at underlying cause

III. EVALUATION

HISTORY

Symptoms of Congestion: Pulmonary vs. Systemic

Pulmonary CongestionSystemic Congestion
Dyspnea on exertion (most common/sensitive)Peripheral edema (ankle, leg, sacral)
Orthopnea (dyspnea lying flat - elevated LVEDP)Abdominal bloating/discomfort
Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (PND)RUQ pain (hepatic congestion)
Cough (nocturnal, dry or productive)Nausea/early satiety (gut edema)
Acute pulmonary edemaAscites
Cardiac asthma (wheeze from bronchial edema)Weight gain (>2 kg/24-48h = alert)

TABLE 264-4: NYHA FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION (NYHAFC)

ClassDescriptionSymptoms
INo limitation of physical activityOrdinary physical activity does NOT cause dyspnea, fatigue, or palpitations
IISlight limitationComfortable at rest; ordinary activity causes symptoms
IIIMarked limitationComfortable at rest; less-than-ordinary activity causes symptoms
IVSymptoms at restUnable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort; symptoms at rest
Note: NYHA class is dynamic and changes with treatment. Used to guide therapy decisions.

Symptoms of Reduced Perfusion (Low Output)

  • Fatigue and exercise intolerance (most common)
  • Mental confusion, difficulty concentrating
  • Cold, clammy extremities
  • Oliguria or nocturia (as renal perfusion shifts nocturnally when supine)
  • Anorexia and early satiety
  • Pre-syncope or syncope (advanced HF)
  • Hemodynamic profile: "Cold and wet" (elevated filling pressures + low output) = worst prognosis

Other Symptoms

  • Palpitations (arrhythmias: AF, PVCs, VT)
  • Chest pain (may represent underlying CAD, or from RV stretch in acute decompensation)
  • Depression and anxiety (common, underdiagnosed)
  • Sleep disturbances: Cheyne-Stokes breathing, central sleep apnea, OSA
  • Weight loss/cardiac cachexia (advanced HF - TNF-α-mediated)

Precipitating Factors


TABLE 264-5: PRECIPITATING FACTORS IN HEART FAILURE

CategorySpecific Factors
Non-complianceDietary sodium/fluid excess, medication non-adherence
IschemicACS, MI, new ischemia/angina
ArrhythmiaNew-onset AF/flutter, VT/VF, complete heart block, rapid ventricular rate
HypertensiveUncontrolled hypertension, hypertensive urgency/emergency
InfectionPneumonia, sepsis, endocarditis, viral myocarditis, COVID-19
ValvularWorsening valvular disease, acute valve rupture (papillary muscle), endocarditis
Drug-relatedNSAIDs, steroids, CCBs, negative inotropes; new cardiotoxic agents; drug/alcohol excess
Thyroid/MetabolicThyrotoxicosis/hypothyroidism, anemia, renal failure
PulmonaryPulmonary embolism, pneumonia, exacerbation of COPD
OtherPregnancy, surgery/perioperative stress, anemia

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

General Appearance

  • May appear comfortable at rest (compensated HF) or in obvious respiratory distress
  • Cardiac cachexia: temporal wasting, temporal muscle loss (advanced HF, poor prognosis)
  • Pallor, jaundice (hepatic congestion)
  • Cyanosis: peripheral (reduced perfusion) or central (intracardiac shunt, severe pulmonary disease)

Vital Signs

  • Heart Rate: On GDMT, resting HR ideally <70-75 bpm; tachycardia (>90 bpm) = poor prognosis
  • Blood Pressure: May have hypotension with narrow pulse pressure in severe HF; hypertension suggests HFpEF or acute HF trigger
  • Pulsus alternans: Alternating strong-weak pulse; incomplete LV recovery every alternate beat; indicates severe LV dysfunction
  • Respiratory Rate: May increase with exertion or lying down; Cheyne-Stokes breathing in advanced HF
  • O₂ saturation: Usually normal at rest; reduced with acute pulmonary edema, intracardiac shunting, pulmonary HTN, or concomitant lung disease
  • Low-grade fever: May occur with severe HF (cytokine activation)

Jugular Venous Pulse (JVP)

  • Method: 45° angle; JVP = height above sternal angle in cm + 5 cm H₂O
  • Normal: ≤8 cm H₂O
  • Hepatojugular reflux (HJR): Firm pressure over liver 15-30s + normal breathing → sustained JVP rise = elevated right-sided pressures
  • Abdominojugular test: Rise in RA pressure during mid-abdominal compression + abrupt drop on release → elevated left-sided filling pressure
  • Prominent V waves + Y descents = significant tricuspid regurgitation
  • Kussmaul's sign: JVP rises with inspiration (instead of falling) - seen in severe biventricular HF, constrictive pericarditis, restrictive CMP; marker of poor outcome

Lung Examination

  • Rales (crackles): Transudation into alveoli; bilateral basal; diffuse in severe HF/acute pulmonary edema
  • Wheeze/Rhonchi: Bronchial mucosal congestion ("cardiac asthma") - may mimic COPD/asthma
  • Absent rales: Despite elevated PCWP in chronic HF due to increased lymphatic drainage
  • Pleural effusions: Dullness to percussion + decreased breath sounds at bases; usually bilateral (right > left when unilateral)

Cardiac Examination

  • Apical impulse: Displaced laterally and inferiorly (dilated CMP); sustained/heaving (pressure overload)
  • RV heave/parasternal lift: Biventricular or right HF
  • S3 gallop: Volume overload + tachycardia; most commonly in HFrEF; hemodynamic compromise; negative prognostic significance
  • S4 gallop: Reduced LV compliance (HFpEF, HTN); not specific to HF
  • Murmurs: Holosystolic murmur of MR or TR (secondary to annular dilatation in HF); soft murmurs may indicate low-output state
  • P2 loud: Pulmonary hypertension

Abdomen and Extremities

  • Hepatomegaly: Tender, pulsatile (TR); painful with acute congestion
  • Ascites: Advanced right/biventricular HF
  • Splenomegaly: Chronic passive congestion
  • Peripheral edema: Bilateral pitting; distribution follows gravity (ankles in ambulatory, sacrum in bedridden)
  • Jaundice: Chronic hepatic congestion → cardiac cirrhosis (late)

IV. DIAGNOSIS

Routine Laboratories

  • CBC: Anemia (high-output HF trigger; predicts poor prognosis); leukocytosis (infection trigger)
  • Metabolic panel: Hyponatremia (poor prognosis - dilutional; RAAS/vasopressin activation); hyperkalemia or hypokalemia (RAAS therapy effects); BUN/creatinine (cardiorenal syndrome)
  • LFTs: Transaminase/bilirubin elevation (passive hepatic congestion)
  • TSH: Thyroid disease as cause or comorbidity
  • Iron studies (Fe, TIBC, ferritin): Iron deficiency = major contributor to exercise intolerance; treatable comorbidity
  • Uric acid: Elevated in HF; marker of poor prognosis
  • Lipid panel: CAD evaluation

Chest X-Ray (CXR)

  • Cardiomegaly: Cardiothoracic ratio >50% on PA film (not reliable in portable AP)
  • Pulmonary venous hypertension: Upper zone vascular redistribution ("cephalization")
  • Interstitial edema: Kerley B lines (horizontal lines in costophrenic angles = engorged lymphatics); peribronchial cuffing
  • Alveolar edema: "Bat-wing" or "butterfly" pattern; perihilar haziness
  • Pleural effusions: Blunting of costophrenic angles (right > left)
  • Normal CXR does NOT exclude HF (especially HFpEF or early HF)

ECG

  • LVH (pressure overload HTN/AS)
  • LBBB (dyssynchrony, suggests dilated CMP, guides CRT)
  • Q waves (ischemic CMP)
  • AF/atrial arrhythmias
  • Low voltage (amyloid, pericardial effusion)
  • Prolonged QRS (CRT candidate)
  • Low voltage with pseudoinfarct pattern = amyloidosis

Noninvasive Imaging

Echocardiography (FIRST LINE):
  • Measures LVEF (classifies HFrEF/HFmrEF/HFpEF)
  • LV dimensions, volumes, wall thickness, wall motion
  • Diastolic function (tissue Doppler E/e' ratio, E/A, deceleration time)
  • Valvular disease, pericardial effusion
  • Estimated RVSP (pulmonary HTN)
  • Strain imaging (GLS - global longitudinal strain) - detects subclinical dysfunction
CMR (Cardiac MRI):
  • Gold standard for volumes/EF when echo is inadequate
  • Tissue characterization: LGE identifies fibrosis/scar (ischemic vs. non-ischemic pattern)
  • Edema detection (myocarditis)
  • Amyloid, sarcoidosis, ARVC diagnosis
Nuclear Imaging:
  • Radionuclide ventriculography (MUGA): accurate EF measurement
  • Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI): ischemia/viability assessment
CT Coronary Angiography:
  • Rule out CAD as etiology (when echo/clinical data inconclusive)

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET)

  • Peak VO₂ (<14 mL/kg/min = poor prognosis; threshold for transplant listing)
  • VE/VCO₂ slope (>35 = poor prognosis)
  • Used for transplant/LVAD evaluation
  • Distinguishes cardiac from pulmonary etiology of dyspnea

Biomarkers

  • BNP/NTproBNP: Released with wall stress; elevated in HF; useful for diagnosis, monitoring, prognosis
    • BNP >100 pg/mL or NTproBNP >300 pg/mL supports HF diagnosis in dyspneic patients
    • Used to guide decongestion therapy
    • "BNP-guided therapy" trials (SIGNAL-HF, PRIMA, GUIDE-IT): inconclusive benefits in outpatient setting
  • Troponin (cTnI/cTnT): Chronic low-level elevation in HF = ongoing myocyte injury; predicts poor prognosis
  • ST2 (sST2): Elevated = cardiac fibrosis and remodeling; additive to BNP for risk stratification
  • Galectin-3: Fibrosis marker; predicts adverse events

Invasive Studies

  • Right heart catheterization (RHC):
    • Measures RA, RV, PA pressures; PCWP (estimates LVEDP); CO by thermodilution/Fick
    • Indicated when: diagnosis uncertain, pre-transplant/LVAD evaluation, pulmonary HTN workup, hemodynamic-guided management of refractory HF
    • Hemodynamic profiles:
      • "Warm and wet" (high PCWP, normal CO) = most common; diuresis
      • "Cold and wet" (high PCWP, low CO) = advanced HF; inotropes + diuresis
      • "Cold and dry" (normal PCWP, low CO) = volume depletion or advanced HF
  • Left heart catheterization: Coronary angiography for ischemic workup; LV end-diastolic pressure
  • Endomyocardial biopsy: Giant cell myocarditis, cardiac amyloidosis, drug toxicity - when specific diagnosis impacts management

V. COMORBIDITIES

Diabetes Mellitus

  • Present in ~40% of HF patients
  • Both HFrEF and HFpEF are more common in diabetics
  • SGLT-2 inhibitors: cornerstone of both DM management and HF management (proven benefit in HFrEF and HFpEF regardless of DM status)
  • GLP-1 agonists: reduce obesity, improve QOL; semaglutide shown to improve symptoms in HFpEF-obesity
  • Avoid TZDs (pioglitazone) - cause fluid retention and worsen HF

Sleep Apnea

  • Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): ~40% of HF; contributes to HTN, pulmonary HTN, right heart dysfunction; CPAP effective
  • Central sleep apnea/Cheyne-Stokes respiration: Driven by high loop gain and chronic hyperventilation; present in ~40% of advanced HFrEF
  • Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) - CONTRAINDICATED in HFrEF with EF ≤45% and central sleep apnea - increased mortality (SERVE-HF trial)

Obesity

  • Major risk factor for HFpEF; "obese HFpEF" is a distinct phenotype
  • Pericardial constraint, increased ventricular interaction, elevated filling pressures
  • GLP-1 agonists (semaglutide): reduced symptoms and improved QOL in STEP-HFpEF trial
  • Paradox of obesity in HFrEF: higher BMI associated with better short-term outcomes ("obesity paradox") - may reflect cardiac reserve

Depression

  • Prevalence ~30-40% in HF; independently predicts worse outcomes
  • SSRIs: Do NOT improve survival (SADHART-CHF); neutral on mortality but may improve QOL
  • Escitalopram shown to be neutral to negative in one trial
  • Psychosocial support and collaborative care important

TABLE 264-8: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF HEART FAILURE

ConditionDistinguishing Features
Pulmonary disease (COPD, asthma)Spirometry, DLCO; PFTs; response to bronchodilators; no elevated BNP
Pulmonary embolismAcute onset; D-dimer; CT-PA; normal BNP possible
Pericardial effusion/tamponadeEcho; pulsus paradoxus; JVP elevated; no pulmonary rales
Constrictive pericarditisKussmaul's sign; pericardial knock; CT/CMR calcification; hemodynamic equalization
Restrictive cardiomyopathyAmyloid/infiltrative pattern; low voltage; biatrial enlargement; CMR LGE
Nephrotic syndromeProteinuria; hypoalbuminemia; no elevated BNP/NTproBNP
Cirrhosis/Hepatic ascitesLiver disease history; normal BNP; hepatic stigmata; portal HTN
HypoalbuminemiaLow albumin; causes dependent edema without elevated filling pressures
Venous insufficiencyChronic stasis; no JVP elevation; normal BNP; unilateral or bilateral leg edema
Obesity hypoventilationElevated BMI; CO₂ retention; normal BNP; no cardiac structural abnormality
Bilateral pleural effusions (malignant)No elevated JVP; cytology; CT
Thyroid diseaseTSH; cardiac features reversible with treatment

Differential Diagnosis - Clinical Approach

Key features favoring HF over mimics:
  1. Elevated BNP/NTproBNP + structural cardiac abnormality on echo
  2. Elevated JVP + pulmonary rales + S3 gallop
  3. Response to diuresis
  4. Symptoms in concordance with echocardiographic findings

CHAPTER 265: HEART FAILURE MANAGEMENT


I. HFpEF AND HFmrEF MANAGEMENT

General Principles

  • Treat underlying causes and precipitants
  • Aggressive control of comorbidities (HTN, AF, DM, obesity, sleep apnea, ischemia)
  • Decongestion with diuretics (symptom relief)
  • Avoid excessive preload reduction (risk of underfilling → azotemia, hypotension, syncope)

Clinical Trials in HFpEF

TrialInterventionResult
TOPCATSpironolactone vs. placeboPrimary endpoint negative; post-hoc: benefit in Americas subgroup
CHARM-PreservedCandesartan vs. placeboNon-significant trend; some reduction in HF hospitalizations
I-PRESERVEIrbesartan vs. placeboNegative
PEP-CHFPerindopril vs. placeboNegative primary endpoint
PARAGON-HFSacubitril-valsartan vs. valsartanPrimary endpoint p=0.06 (marginally missed); benefit in women and those with lower EF; FDA approved across full EF spectrum
PARAGLIDE-HFSacubitril-valsartan vs. valsartanReduced NTproBNP at 8 weeks; benefit confined to EF ≤60%
EMPEROR-PreservedEmpagliflozin vs. placeboPOSITIVE - significant reduction in CV death/HF hospitalizations
DELIVERDapagliflozin vs. placeboPOSITIVE - significant reduction in worsening HF/CV death
STEP-HFpEFSemaglutide vs. placeboImproved symptoms, QOL, and 6MWT in obese HFpEF
SGLT-2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin): First class of drugs with proven benefit in HFpEF - now Class I recommendation.

Other Therapeutic Agents in HFpEF

  • Diuretics: Symptom relief; no mortality benefit demonstrated
  • ACEIs/ARBs: Not proven effective (except prevention); guideline-directed for HTN management
  • Spironolactone/MRA: May be beneficial; used especially when EF 45-55%
  • Sacubitril-valsartan: Approved across full EF spectrum; greatest benefit EF below normal
  • Beta-blockers: Useful for rate control in AF; not proven beneficial in pure HFpEF sinus rhythm
  • GLP-1 agonists (semaglutide): Improve QOL irrespective of DM status in obese HFpEF
  • Avoid: ASV (increased mortality), TZDs (fluid retention), calcium channel blockers (limited role)

FIGURE 265-1: HFpEF - Pathophysiology, Therapeutic Principles and Directed Therapy

Key elements (from Harrison's Figure 265-1):
PATHOLOGY: Hypertrophy, Fibrosis/altered collagen, Infarction/ischemia
RISK MARKERS: Hypertension, Aging, Atherosclerosis, Diabetes, Obesity
General Therapeutic Principles:
  1. Reduce the congestive state - Caution: don't reduce preload excessively; implantable hemodynamic monitors useful
  2. Control blood pressure - Central aortic BP control may be more relevant
  3. Maintain atrial contraction and prevent tachycardia - AF ablation may reduce morbidity/mortality
  4. Treat and prevent myocardial ischemia - May mimic HF as angina equivalent
  5. Detect and treat sleep apnea - Common comorbidity; ASV INEFFECTIVE/harmful
  6. Lifestyle modification - Diet + exercise for weight reduction and functional capacity
Specific Therapy Targets:
  • RAAS: ACEIs/ARBs ineffective (except prevention); aldosterone antagonists may be beneficial
  • Digoxin: Ineffective (may reduce hospitalizations)
  • Beta blockers/CCBs: Ineffective (useful for tachycardia prevention in AF)
  • PDE-5 inhibitors: Sildenafil ineffective
  • Novel: ARNi (may be effective); SGLT-2i (reduce HF hospitalization) - PROVEN
  • Chronotropic insufficiency: Targeted pacing - likely ineffective
  • Obesity: GLP-1 agonists (improve QOL irrespective of DM)

Clinical Guiding Principles (HFpEF)

  • Precise diagnosis essential - HFpEF is a heterogeneous group; infiltrative, storage, pericardial, valvular disease may require entirely different management
  • Aggressive BP control to guideline targets
  • Diuretics for volume overload
  • Evaluate for ischemia if coronary risk present
  • AF: aggressive rate control, anticoagulation, early rhythm restoration
  • Comorbidities (obesity, OSA, CKD, anemia/iron deficiency) = important treatment targets
  • Avoid excessive preload reduction

II. ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE (ADHF)

General Principles

  • ADHF is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome resulting from decreased cardiac performance + renal dysfunction + vascular compliance alterations
  • Admission with ADHF = excessive morbidity/mortality; ~50% readmission within 6 months
  • Primary goal: Rapid decongestion while maintaining organ perfusion
  • Hemodynamic profiling essential:
    • "Warm and wet" = most common; diuresis
    • "Cold and wet" = inotropes + diuresis
    • "Cold and dry" = volume challenge or advanced HF/cardiogenic shock

Volume Management - IV Diuretics

First-line therapy for ADHF with congestion:
DrugClassStarting DoseNotes
FurosemideLoop diuretic40-200 mg IVStandard first-line; double outpatient oral dose IV at minimum
BumetanideLoop diuretic0.5-2 mg IVMore bioavailable than furosemide
TorsemideLoop diuretic10-100 mg IV/POBetter oral bioavailability; may be preferred in outpatient transition
Ethacrynic acidLoop diuretic25-100 mg IVUse if sulfonamide allergy
DOSE Trial findings: High-dose diuretic strategy (2.5x oral dose) → greater diuresis and more rapid symptom relief, at cost of transient worsening of renal function; no difference in 60-day outcomes. Bolus vs. continuous infusion: No significant difference; bolus may be preferred operationally.
Goal of diuresis: Net negative fluid balance 1-2 L/day; urine Na >70 mEq/L suggests adequate response; daily weights; avoid excessive diuresis (watch BUN/creatinine)
Diuretic resistance:
  • Mechanisms: Poor gut absorption (IV route needed), aldosterone breakthrough, neurohormonal activation, renal hypoperfusion
  • Management: IV loop diuretics + metolazone (thiazide) combination (synergistic); ultrafiltration

Cardiorenal Syndrome in ADHF

  • Worsening renal function (WRF) during ADHF hospitalization = common and complex
  • May NOT worsen outcomes if decongestion is achieved (CARRESS-HF data)
  • Permissive approach to creatinine rise (if decongestion is ongoing) is often appropriate
  • Persistent WRF with inadequate decongestion = poor prognosis

Ultrafiltration

  • Mechanical removal of isotonic plasma water using semipermeable membrane
  • CARRESS-HF trial: Ultrafiltration was NOT superior to pharmacologic diuresis; associated with more adverse events including worsening renal function
  • Reserved for: true diuretic resistance, intractable volume overload, hypervolemic hyponatremia

Vasoactive Therapy

Vasodilators (for "warm and wet" or hypertensive ADHF):

TABLE 265-1: VASOACTIVE THERAPY IN ADHF

DrugClassMechanismDoseHemodynamic EffectsNotes
Nitroglycerin (NTG)Organic nitrateNO donor; venodilation (low dose) + arteriodilation (high dose)10-200 mcg/min IV↓ preload >> afterload; ↓ PCWP, ↓ RAFirst-line vasodilator; tachyphylaxis within 24h; avoid in RV infarction
Sodium NitroprussideInorganic nitrateNO donor; balanced arteriolar + venous dilation0.1-5 mcg/kg/min IV↓↓ SVR, ↓ PCWPHypertensive urgency + HF; cyanide toxicity (renal insufficiency); requires ICU monitoring
Nesiritide (BNP)Natriuretic peptideStimulates cGMP; vasodilation, natriuresis2 mcg/kg bolus → 0.01 mcg/kg/min↓ PCWP, ↓ SVR; mild ↑ COASCEND-HF: No mortality benefit; renal concerns; limited current use
HydralazineDirect vasodilatorArteriolar dilation via unclear mechanism10-75 mg q6-8h PO↓ SVR, ↓ afterloadUsed in combo with isosorbide dinitrate (BiDil for African Americans)
Isosorbide dinitrateOrganic nitrateVenodilation20-160 mg/day PO↓ PreloadCombination with hydralazine
ClevidipineShort-acting CCBL-type Ca channel blockade1-16 mg/h IVRapid BP lowering; minimal HR effectHypertensive ADHF
FenoldopamDA-1 agonistRenal + systemic vasodilation0.1-0.3 mcg/kg/min↓ BP; ↑ renal blood flowHypertensive ADHF + renal dysfunction
Inotropic Therapy:
DrugClassMechanismDoseNotes
DobutamineBeta-1 agonist↑ cAMP; ↑ contractility, ↑ HR2-20 mcg/kg/min IVFirst-line inotrope; tachycardia; arrhythmogenic; tolerance develops
MilrinonePDE-3 inhibitor↑ cAMP; inodilatation (inotrope + vasodilator)0.125-0.75 mcg/kg/min IVPreferred in beta-blocked patients; hypotension; arrhythmias; OPTIME-CHF: worse in ischemic HF
DopamineDopaminergic/adrenergicDose-dependent: D1 (renal) → β1 (inotrope) → α1 (vasoconstriction)2-20 mcg/kg/minLow-dose ("renal dose") dopamine unproven for renal protection; not first-line inotrope
LevosimendanCa sensitizer + K-ATP channel opener↑ myofilament Ca sensitivity; vasodilation12 mcg/kg bolus → 0.1 mcg/kg/minApproved in EU; NOT approved in US; neutral/positive results in some trials
NorepinephrineAlpha + beta agonistVasoconstriction + inotropy0.1-1 mcg/kg/minFor cardiogenic shock with hypotension; combination with inotrope
Other ADHF Therapies:
  • Oxygen: Maintain SpO₂ >94%; high-flow nasal cannula for moderate hypoxia
  • Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) - CPAP/BiPAP: Beneficial for cardiogenic pulmonary edema (reduces intubation rate, improves dyspnea)
  • Mechanical ventilation: For refractory respiratory failure
  • Morphine: Historical use; recent ADHF data (OPIATES trial) showed increased ICU transfer, mechanical ventilation, mortality - CAUTION/avoid
  • Mechanical circulatory support (IABP, Impella, ECMO): For cardiogenic shock
ADHF Clinical Guiding Principles:
  1. Rapidly identify and treat precipitating cause
  2. Hemodynamic profiling to guide therapy
  3. Decongestion is the primary goal
  4. Transition to oral GDMT before discharge
  5. Intensive early postdischarge follow-up (STRONG-HF: 2-week intensive titration → reduced 180-day readmissions)
  6. Avoid morphine
  7. Correct electrolyte abnormalities

III. HFrEF MANAGEMENT

TABLE 265-2: GUIDELINE-DIRECTED PHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY (GDMT) AND TARGET DOSES IN HFrEF

DrugStarting DoseTarget/Maximum DoseKey TrialOutcome
ACE INHIBITORS
Captopril6.25 mg TID50 mg TIDSAVE, SOLVD↓ Mortality 17-23%
Enalapril2.5 mg BID10-20 mg BIDCONSENSUS, SOLVD↓ Mortality 16-40%
Lisinopril2.5-5 mg OD20-40 mg ODATLAS↓ Mortality/hospitalizations
Ramipril1.25-2.5 mg OD10 mg ODAIRE, HOPEPost-MI benefit
ARBs (if ACEI-intolerant)
Candesartan4-8 mg OD32 mg ODCHARMNon-inferior to ACEI
Valsartan40 mg BID160 mg BIDVal-HeFT↓ Hospitalization
ARNi (REPLACE ACEI/ARB)
Sacubitril-Valsartan24/26 mg BID97/103 mg BIDPARADIGM-HF↓ CV death/HF hosp 20% vs. enalapril
BETA-BLOCKERS
Carvedilol3.125 mg BID25 mg BID (50 mg if >85 kg)COPERNICUS, CAPRICORN↓ Mortality 35%
Metoprolol succinate (XL)12.5-25 mg OD200 mg ODMERIT-HF↓ Mortality 34%
Bisoprolol1.25 mg OD10 mg ODCIBIS-II↓ Mortality 34%
MRA
Spironolactone12.5-25 mg OD25-50 mg ODRALES↓ Mortality 30% (Class III-IV)
Eplerenone25 mg OD50 mg ODEPHESUS, EMPHASIS-HF↓ Mortality post-MI and Class II
SGLT-2 INHIBITORS
Dapagliflozin10 mg OD10 mg ODDAPA-HF↓ CV death/worsening HF 26%
Empagliflozin10 mg OD10 mg ODEMPEROR-Reduced↓ CV death/HF hosp 25%
SPECIAL POPULATIONS
Hydralazine + Isosorbide (BiDil)H 25 mg + I 20 mg TIDH 75 mg + I 40 mg TIDV-HeFT I/II, A-HeFT↓ Mortality in African Americans; alternative if ACEI/ARNi intolerant
HEART RATE MODIFICATION
Ivabradine5 mg BID7.5 mg BIDSHIFT↓ HF hospitalization (EF ≤35%, HR ≥70, on max BB, sinus rhythm)

NEUROHORMONAL ANTAGONISM (HFrEF)

Class Effect and Sequence of Administration:
  • ACEIs/ARBs: Class effect; any can be used; titrate to evidence-based doses
  • Beta-blockers: NOT a class effect - only carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol succinate proven to improve survival; agents with ISA (xamoterol, bucindolol) ineffective or harmful
  • CIBIS III trial: Order of initiation (ACEI vs. BB first) does not affect outcome; what matters is achieving optimal doses of both
  • Dose and outcome are correlated: Aggressive titration to target doses improves outcomes
RAAS Therapy and Neurohormonal Escape:
  • Aldosterone levels may "escape" ACE inhibitor therapy over time (via non-ACE pathways: chymase, kallikrein)
  • Rationale for adding MRA (spironolactone/eplerenone) on top of ACEI/ARB
  • RAAS triple therapy (ACEI + ARB + MRA): AVOID - increased adverse events (hyperkalemia, renal impairment) without additional benefit (ONTARGET)
  • ARNi (Sacubitril-Valsartan) has REPLACED ACEI/ARB as preferred neurohormonal agent:
    • PARADIGM-HF: Sacubitril-valsartan reduced CV death/HF hospitalization by 20% vs. enalapril
    • Requires wash-out period of 36 hours when switching from ACEI (angioedema risk)
    • Neprilysin inhibition → ↑ BNP (can no longer use BNP for monitoring; use NTproBNP instead)

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA)

  • Spironolactone (RALES trial): NYHA III-IV on ACEI + furosemide; 30% reduction in mortality
  • Eplerenone (EMPHASIS-HF): NYHA II, EF ≤35%; significant mortality reduction
  • Key safety: Monitor K+ and renal function (risk of hyperkalemia); avoid if K+ >5.0 mEq/L or eGFR <30

Alternative Vasodilators

  • Hydralazine + Isosorbide dinitrate (H-ISDN):
    • Alternative for patients who cannot tolerate ACEI/ARB (renal insufficiency, bilateral RAS, angioedema)
    • A-HeFT trial: Significant mortality benefit specifically in African Americans - BiDil (fixed-dose combination) approved for this indication
    • Mechanism: Hydralazine (arteriodilation) + ISDN (venodilation) + hydralazine antioxidant effect (prevents nitrate tolerance)

Novel Neurohormonal Antagonists

Sacubitril-Valsartan (ARNi): (see above)
Vericiguat (sGC stimulator):
  • Stimulates soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) → ↑ cGMP → vasodilation; independent of NO availability
  • VICTORIA trial: Significant reduction in HF hospitalization and CV death in high-risk HFrEF (after worsening HF event); absolute benefit modest
  • Dose: 2.5 mg → 10 mg once daily
  • Added to GDMT for high-risk patients

HEART RATE MODIFICATION

Ivabradine:
  • Selective If channel blocker (funny current in SA node) → ↓ HR without negative inotropy
  • SHIFT trial: EF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, HR ≥70 bpm, on maximally tolerated beta-blocker
  • Significant reduction in HF hospitalization (not mortality)
  • Indication: LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, HR ≥70 bpm despite maximally tolerated beta-blocker

SGLT-2 INHIBITION

  • Originally developed for diabetes; demonstrated striking CV benefits independent of glycemic effects
  • Mechanisms in HF:
    • Osmotic diuresis/natriuresis (reduce preload)
    • Reduced sympathetic tone
    • Improved cardiac metabolism (ketone utilization)
    • Reduced oxidative stress and inflammation
    • Direct cardiac effects (anti-hypertrophic, anti-fibrotic)
    • Erythropoietic effects (increase EPO)
  • DAPA-HF (dapagliflozin): 26% reduction in CV death/worsening HF in HFrEF (with AND without DM)
  • EMPEROR-Reduced (empagliflozin): 25% reduction in CV death/HF hospitalization in HFrEF
  • EMPEROR-Preserved + DELIVER: Proven benefit in HFpEF/HFmrEF
  • Dose: Fixed: Dapagliflozin 10 mg OD, Empagliflozin 10 mg OD

SOLUBLE GUANYLYL CYCLASE (sGC) STIMULATION

Vericiguat: (see above)
  • Mechanism: sGC stimulator → ↑ cGMP → vasodilation + cardiac effects
  • Works independently of NO availability (advantage in HF where NO signaling is impaired)
  • VICTORIA trial: modest but significant benefit in very high-risk HFrEF

MYOSIN ACTIVATION (Novel Agent)

Omecamtiv Mecarbil:
  • Selective cardiac myosin activator → prolongs systolic ejection time → ↑ stroke volume without ↑ intracellular calcium
  • GALACTIC-HF trial: Modest reduction in HF events (significant primary endpoint); no significant mortality reduction; largest benefit in those with lowest LVEF (≤28%)
  • Not yet approved; represents a new class targeting contractile apparatus rather than neurohormonal system

DIGOXIN

  • Oldest cardiac drug; inhibits Na+/K+ ATPase → increases intracellular Ca → modest positive inotropy; also reduces sympathetic tone and slows AV conduction
  • DIG trial: No mortality benefit; significant reduction in HF hospitalizations
  • Current role:
    • Rate control in HFrEF + AF (adjunct to beta-blockers)
    • Selected symptomatic patients with HFrEF despite GDMT
    • NARROW THERAPEUTIC WINDOW: Target digoxin level 0.5-0.9 ng/mL (higher levels = increased mortality)
    • Caution: renal failure, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, drug interactions (amiodarone, clarithromycin, verapamil)
    • NOTE: Ineffective in HFpEF

ORAL DIURETICS

  • Furosemide: 20-160 mg OD-BID PO; variable bioavailability (10-100%); consider switching to torsemide
  • Torsemide: Superior oral bioavailability; may reduce HF hospitalizations vs. furosemide (TRANSFORM-HF: similar overall, but torsemide better tolerated)
  • Metolazone: Added for diuretic resistance; 2.5-5 mg before loop diuretic; monitor electrolytes carefully
  • Spironolactone/Eplerenone: Dual function (MRA + diuretic); especially useful with electrolyte-sparing effect
  • Goal: Euvolemia; daily weight monitoring; adjust dose based on renal function and electrolytes

CALCIUM CHANNEL ANTAGONISTS

  • Non-dihydropyridines (verapamil, diltiazem): CONTRAINDICATED in HFrEF - negative inotropy worsens outcomes
  • Amlodipine/Felodipine: Safe in HFrEF; no mortality benefit but no harm (PRAISE-1/2); used for hypertension or angina in HFrEF
  • In HFpEF: CCBs may be used for rate control in AF or HTN management

ANTI-INFLAMMATORY THERAPY

  • IL-1 blockade (Anakinra): Small RCTs show improvement in functional capacity and inflammatory markers; larger trials needed
  • Colchicine: COPE trial (post-pericardiotomy); data in HF limited
  • TNF-α antagonists: Infliximab, etanercept - TESTED AND FAILED in HF trials (ATTACH, RENEWAL); harm in higher doses - AVOID/CONTRAINDICATED in HFrEF
  • Pentraxin: No proven benefit
  • SGLT-2i indirectly anti-inflammatory: Partly explains benefits

HMG-CoA REDUCTASE INHIBITORS (STATINS)

  • Theoretically beneficial (anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, pleiotropic effects)
  • CORONA and GISSI-HF trials: Rosuvastatin vs. placebo in HFrEF → NO mortality benefit
  • Current recommendation:
    • Initiate statins if underlying CAD or other CV indications (primary indication remains lipid lowering/cardiovascular event prevention)
    • Do NOT start statins solely for HF treatment
    • If already on statins, continue (do not discontinue)

ANTICOAGULATION AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPY

  • AF + HF: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is indicated - NOACs preferred over warfarin (ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF data)
  • HFrEF in sinus rhythm: NO routine anticoagulation; WARCEF trial: warfarin vs. aspirin - net effect neutral; ↑ bleeding, modest stroke reduction
  • Low-dose rivaroxaban (COMMANDER-HF): No benefit in HFrEF sinus rhythm with CAD
  • Aspirin: If concurrent CAD/prior MI; not routinely for HF alone
  • Heparin (DVT prophylaxis): LMWH during hospitalization for immobile patients

FISH OIL (N-3 PUFA)

  • GISSI-HF trial: Omega-3 (1 g/day) in HFrEF → modest but significant reduction in mortality and HF hospitalizations (NNT ~56 over 4 years)
  • Mechanism: Anti-arrhythmic, anti-inflammatory, membrane stabilizing
  • Considered "potentially effective" (see Fig 265-3)
  • Recommended: 1 g OD omega-3 PUFA in symptomatic HFrEF (Class IIb recommendation)

MICRONUTRIENTS

  • Iron deficiency (without anemia): Common in HF; impairs exercise tolerance and quality of life
    • IV iron (ferric carboxymaltose - AFFIRM-AHF, CONFIRM-HF): Reduces HF hospitalizations; improves symptoms and functional capacity; AFFIRM-AHF: IV FCM reduced HF hospitalization by 26% after ADHF
    • Oral iron: Poorly absorbed in HF; generally less effective
  • Thiamine: Deficiency possible in elderly HF patients on furosemide; supplementation reasonable
  • Magnesium: Deplete with diuresis; supplement to prevent arrhythmias
  • Zinc: Deficiency in cardiac cachexia; supplementation not proven

ENHANCED EXTERNAL COUNTERPULSATION (EECP)

  • Pneumatic compression of lower limbs during diastole → augments diastolic pressure and coronary perfusion
  • MUST study: limited benefit in HFrEF
  • Current role: Adjunct for refractory angina in patients not candidates for revascularization; limited HF use

EXERCISE

  • HF-ACTION trial: Aerobic exercise training (supervised + home-based) → modest but significant improvement in all-cause mortality/hospitalization; improved QOL and functional capacity
  • Recommendation: Moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (e.g., walking 30 min, 5 days/week) in stable HFrEF is safe and beneficial
  • Cardiac rehabilitation programs recommended
  • Resistance training: Safe in stable HFrEF; improves muscle strength and functional capacity

MANAGEMENT OF SELECTED COMORBIDITIES

ComorbidityManagement Strategy
AFRate control (beta-blocker + digoxin); rhythm control (amiodarone, catheter ablation); OAC mandatory
HypertensionARNi/ACEI/ARB + MRA + beta-blocker (GDMT serves dual purpose)
DiabetesSGLT-2i first-line (HF benefit); GLP-1 agonists (weight/QOL in HFpEF); avoid TZDs
CKDGDMT with dose adjustment; SGLT-2i safe to eGFR 20-25; RHC before renal transplant
Iron deficiencyIV iron (ferric carboxymaltose); recheck ferritin/TSAT every 3-6 months
OSACPAP
Central sleep apneaOxygen; ASV CONTRAINDICATED in HFrEF EF ≤45%
DepressionSSRIs (neutral outcome; may improve QOL); psychotherapy; collaborative care
AnemiaTreat iron deficiency; ESAs NOT beneficial in HF
GoutAllopurinol safe; colchicine for acute gout; avoid NSAIDs
COPDContinue beta-blockers (cardioselective preferred); address modifiable risk

IV. DEVICE THERAPY (NEUROMODULATION)

Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM)

  • Delivers non-excitatory electrical signals during absolute refractory period → ↑ contractility without initiating AP
  • FIX-HF-5 trial: Improved VO₂ and QOL in NYHA III, EF 25-45%, QRS <130 ms (i.e., NOT CRT candidate)
  • Approved in US as adjunct to GDMT for HFrEF in non-CRT candidates

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)

Mechanism: Simultaneous biventricular pacing corrects electrical dyssynchrony → improved mechanical efficiency → reverse remodeling
Indications (Class I):
  • LVEF ≤35%
  • LBBB with QRS ≥150 ms
  • NYHA Class II-III-IV (ambulatory) on GDMT
  • Sinus rhythm
MADIT-CRT, RAFT, REVERSE trials: CRT reduces HF hospitalizations, mortality, and achieves reverse remodeling (↑ EF, ↓ LV dimensions)
CRT-D (with defibrillator) vs. CRT-P (pacemaker only):
  • CRT-D preferred in most patients with reasonable survival expectancy and no significant comorbidities
  • CRT-P in older patients, significant comorbidity, shorter expected benefit
Response rates: ~70% show clinical improvement; ~15-20% are "non-responders"
Predictors of CRT response: LBBB morphology, female sex, non-ischemic etiology, QRS >150ms, less RV dysfunction

Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention in HF

Risk factors for SCD in HF:
  • LVEF ≤35% (strongest predictor)
  • Prior VT/VF
  • NYHA Class II-III (paradoxically higher risk than NYHA IV)
  • NSVT on Holter
ICD Therapy:
SettingTrialIndicationBenefit
Secondary preventionAll SCD trialsPrior VT/VF arrest↓ Mortality vs. amiodarone
Primary prevention - Non-ischemicSCD-HeFT, MADIT-CRTLVEF ≤35%, NYHA II-III on GDMT ≥3 months↓ Mortality 23-31%
Primary prevention - IschemicMADIT-II, MUSTTLVEF ≤30-35%, prior MI ≥40 days↓ Mortality 31%
Key caveats:
  • Wait ≥3 months of GDMT before reassessing EF for ICD/CRT eligibility (EF may recover)
  • Wait ≥40 days post-MI before ICD implant
  • Wearable ICD (LifeVest): Bridge to ICD in newly diagnosed HFrEF awaiting GDMT response assessment

V. SURGICAL THERAPY IN HF

InterventionIndicationEvidence
CABGIschemic HFrEF with viable myocardiumSTICH trial: CABG + GDMT → ↓ long-term mortality vs. GDMT alone
Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR)LV aneurysm post-MISTICH: SVR added to CABG → no additional benefit
Mitral valve repair/replacementSevere functional MR, NYHA III-IV, EF >30%COAPT: MitraClip → ↓ mortality and HF hospitalizations in severe functional MR
TAVI/SAVRSevere AS-related HFStandard of care; TAVI for high/intermediate-risk
Heart transplantationEnd-stage HF, peak VO₂ <12-14 mL/kg/min, refractory to GDMT1-year survival >90%; median survival >12 years; gold standard for end-stage HF
LVAD (Destination therapy)Ineligible for transplant; bridge to transplantREMATCH: DT-LVAD → ↓ mortality vs. medical therapy in end-stage HF
Total artificial heartBiventricular failure; bridge to transplant onlyCardioWest TAH; highly specialized centers

VI. CELLULAR AND GENE-BASED THERAPY

  • Bone marrow/cardiac-derived stem cells: Multiple trials; inconsistent results; not currently clinically established
  • c-kit+ cells: Small pilot trials showed LV function improvement; not confirmed in larger studies
  • Mesenchymal stem cells (DREAM-HF): Randomized trial - NEGATIVE primary and secondary endpoints
  • SERCA2a gene therapy (CUPID trial): Initially promising; confirmatory trial failed primary endpoint
  • Current status: Investigational; no approved cellular or gene therapy for HF as of 2025
  • LVAD recovery strategy: Efforts to use MSCs for weaning from LVAD have been disappointing

VII. DISEASE MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORTIVE CARE

  • Despite excellent pharmacotherapy, ~50% readmitted within 6 months of discharge
  • Recurrent HF = only half of readmissions; non-cardiac comorbidities drive the rest
  • STRONG-HF trial: Intensive titration of GDMT within 2 weeks + frequent ambulatory follow-up through 2 months → significant reduction in all-cause mortality and HF readmission at 180 days
  • Telemonitoring of weight/vital signs: NOT shown to decrease hospitalizations in RCTs
  • Intrathoracic impedance monitoring (OptiVol): Not proven; high false-positive rate → may paradoxically increase hospitalizations
  • CardioMEMS (implantable PA pressure sensor - CHAMPION trial): PA pressure-guided management → significant reduction in HF hospitalization; approved in US for NYHA III HF with prior HF hospitalization
Key discharge elements:
  • Comprehensive discharge planning + patient/caregiver education
  • Appropriate visiting nurse involvement
  • Optimized oral GDMT before discharge
  • Follow-up within 7-14 days of discharge (STRONG-HF protocol)
  • Daily weight monitoring; action plan for weight gain >2 kg
Supportive/Palliative Care:
  • Advance directives and goals-of-care discussions in advanced HF
  • Symptom management: opioids for dyspnea (low-dose), diuretics
  • Multidisciplinary HF team (cardiologist, HF nurse, pharmacist, social work, palliative care)
  • Hospice referral for NYHA IV refractory to all therapy

QUICK-REFERENCE FLOWCHARTS


FLOWCHART 1: HF DIAGNOSIS

Symptoms (dyspnea, edema, fatigue) + Signs (elevated JVP, rales, S3)
                           ↓
              Measure BNP/NTproBNP
         ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
    BNP <100 pg/mL                    BNP ≥100 pg/mL
    (HF unlikely)                     (HF possible)
                                              ↓
                                    Echocardiography
                         ┌──────────────────────────────────┐
                    Structural cardiac abnormality?
                         YES                            NO
                          ↓                              ↓
              Classify EF:                   Consider alternative dx
        EF ≤40% → HFrEF                     (pulmonary, renal, etc.)
        EF 41-49% → HFmrEF
        EF ≥50% → HFpEF
                          ↓
                Search for cause (Table 264-2)
                Identify precipitants (Table 264-5)
                Assess severity (NYHA class - Table 264-4)

FLOWCHART 2: ADHF MANAGEMENT

ADHF Presentation
       ↓
Hemodynamic Profiling
   ┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
"Warm & Wet"        "Cold & Wet"         "Cold & Dry"
(Most Common)       (Low output + HF)    (Advanced/Volume depleted)
   ↓                      ↓                     ↓
IV Diuretics          Inotropes +           Careful volume 
(loop diuretic)       IV Diuretics          challenge or
+ Vasodilators        (Dobutamine/          MCS/evaluation
(if BP ≥90)           Milrinone)            for advanced HF
       ↓
Assess response at 6-12 hours:
- Urine output >100 mL/h? ✓
- Dyspnea improving? ✓
- Weight decreasing? ✓
       ↓
If inadequate: Add metolazone or consider ultrafiltration
       ↓
Euvolemia achieved → Transition to oral GDMT
       ↓
Before Discharge:
- Start/optimize ARNi/ACEI + BB + MRA + SGLT-2i
- Patient education
- Follow-up within 7-14 days

FLOWCHART 3: HFrEF GDMT INITIATION (THE "FANTASTIC FOUR")

New HFrEF Diagnosis (EF ≤40%)
              ↓
Start ALL FOUR simultaneously or sequentially:
    ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
    │  1. ARNi (sacubitril-valsartan) - preferred over    │
    │     ACEI/ARB; if intolerant → ACEI or ARB or H-ISDN │
    │  2. Beta-blocker (carvedilol/metoprolol/bisoprolol)  │
    │  3. MRA (spironolactone/eplerenone)                  │
    │  4. SGLT-2i (dapagliflozin/empagliflozin)           │
    └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
              ↓
          Reassess in 3 months:
    EF still ≤35% AND NYHA II-III AND HR ≥70?
              ↓ Yes
    Consider ivabradine (SHIFT trial)
              ↓
    EF still ≤35% on GDMT ≥3 months, LBBB QRS ≥150ms?
              ↓ Yes
    CRT-D implant
              ↓
    EF ≤35%, NYHA II-III, not CRT candidate?
              ↓ Yes
    ICD (primary prevention) or
    CCM (if QRS <130ms, EF 25-45%)
              ↓
    Refractory/NYHA IV despite GDMT + device therapy?
              ↓ Yes
    LVAD (bridge to transplant or destination therapy)
    → Cardiac transplantation if eligible

FLOWCHART 4: SCD PREVENTION IN HFrEF

HFrEF (EF ≤35%)
       ↓
Optimize GDMT ≥3 months
       ↓
Reassess LVEF
    EF ≤35%?
       ↓ YES
NYHA II-III (ambulatory)?
       ↓ YES
Prior VT/VF? → ICD (Secondary prevention - Class I)
No prior VT/VF → ICD Primary prevention (SCD-HeFT/MADIT-II)
       ↓
LBBB + QRS ≥150ms? → CRT-D (preferred over ICD alone)
       ↓
Expected meaningful survival >1 year?
       ↓ YES
ICD or CRT-D implant

KEY SUMMARY TABLE: 4 PILLARS OF HFrEF THERAPY

Drug ClassDrugMortality ReductionKey Safety
ARNi/ACEISacubitril-valsartan~20% vs. enalaprilWatch K+, renal function, BP; 36h washout from ACEI
Beta-blockerCarvedilol/Metoprolol/Bisoprolol~34-35%Start low, go slow; not for acute decompensation
MRASpironolactone/Eplerenone~15-30%Monitor K+, eGFR; avoid if K+ >5 or eGFR <30
SGLT-2iDapagliflozin/Empagliflozin~25% compositeUTI/genital infections; do not use if eGFR <20

Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 22nd Edition (2025) - Chapters 264 & 265 Authors: Michael M. Givertz, Mandeep R. Mehra
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.