Apr

It looks like your message got cut off! Did you mean to type something starting with "Apr"? Could you complete your question or thought?

Apr

Your message still appears to be cut off - I'm only seeing "Apr." Could you finish your thought? For example, are you asking about:
  • April (a month, a date, an event?)
  • APR (Annual Percentage Rate?)
  • Apr as part of a longer word or question?
Let me know what you meant and I'll help right away!

Abdomino perineal resection

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

abdominoperineal resection rectal cancer outcomes

Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Excellent - I now have comprehensive information from multiple authoritative sources. Here is the complete answer:

Abdominoperineal Resection (APR)

Definition

Abdominoperineal resection is the surgical removal of the entire rectum, anal canal, and anus along with the surrounding mesorectum and levator muscles, resulting in a permanent end colostomy from the descending or sigmoid colon. It is one of the oldest and most definitive operations for low rectal cancer.
  • Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 11th ed.
  • Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th ed.

Indications

  • Low rectal cancer (lower third, within ~5 cm of the anal verge) that is not amenable to sphincter-preserving surgery
  • Tumors involving or too close to the anal sphincter complex
  • Poor preoperative anal sphincter function (moderate to poor function is better served by APR than a low anastomosis that will result in incontinence)
  • Anal canal cancers - as salvage surgery after failed/incomplete chemoradiotherapy (Nigro protocol); historically APR was the primary treatment but is now reserved for residual/recurrent disease
  • Complications of chemoradiotherapy: fistula, incontinence, recurrent disease
  • Adenocarcinoma of the anal canal (extension of low rectal cancer)
Key point: Anal canal squamous cell carcinoma is now treated primarily with chemoradiotherapy (mitomycin + 5-FU + radiotherapy 50.5 Gy). APR is a salvage procedure for the 20-25% with incomplete response or recurrence, and achieves cure in ~50% of salvage cases.
  • Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th ed.

Surgical Technique

Patient Positioning

Traditionally, two surgeons operated simultaneously - one via abdomen and one via perineum (patient in Trendelenburg lithotomy). The modern approach is:
  1. Complete the abdominal phase first (patient in Lloyd-Davies position with legs in low supports)
  2. Then reposition the patient in prone jack-knife position (or keep in Lloyd-Davies) for the perineal phase

Abdominal Phase

  • Lower midline laparotomy or minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) approach
  • Explore for metastatic disease
  • Medial-to-lateral colon mobilization with early identification of the left ureter and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA)
  • Total mesorectal excision (TME): sharp dissection in the avascular embryological plane between the visceral and parietal pelvic fascia, maintaining the "shiny" mesorectal envelope intact
  • Abdominal dissection stops before reaching the pelvic floor (at the level of the seminal vesicles in men / the cervix in women) - this avoids "coning down" onto the tumor
  • Identify and protect bilateral hypogastric nerves, ureters, and neurovascular bundles
  • End sigmoid/descending colostomy is fashioned in the left iliac fossa

Perineal Phase

  • Circumanal elliptical incision around the anus
  • Deepen into the ischiorectal fossae laterally toward the levator muscle attachments on the pelvic sidewall
  • Posteriorly: incise Waldeyer's fascia (thick pelvic fascia between rectum and sacrum); some surgeons remove the coccyx for better access
  • Anteriorly: carefully develop the plane between the rectum and the prostate/membranous urethra in males or the posterior vaginal wall in females; a urinary catheter helps identify the urethra
  • Division of pubococcygeus and puborectalis muscles
  • Specimen retrieved through the perineal wound when perineal dissection connects with the abdominal dissection

Extralevator APR (ELAPE)

A key modern modification - deliberate resection of the levator muscles near their bony attachments, creating a cylindrical (rather than waist-like) specimen around the anus and distal rectum. This:
  • Avoids "coning down" or entering the plane between the tumor and levator ani
  • Reduces intraoperative perforation rates
  • Improves circumferential resection margin (CRM) clearance
  • Reduces local recurrence
ELAPE is most useful for low, locally advanced rectal cancers. Routine use for all APRs has not been shown to improve cancer outcomes universally.
  • Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 11th ed.
  • Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th ed.

Neoadjuvant Therapy and Downstaging

An important contemporary issue: tumors initially thought to require APR may downstage after long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, potentially allowing sphincter-preserving surgery. Complete pathological response occurs in 10-30% of cases. However, changing operative strategy from APR to sphincter-preserving resection after downstaging requires careful reassessment (repeat MRI for CRM and distal margin >1 cm above sphincters) and remains investigational - it should not be done without strong evidence of adequate margins.
  • Fischer's Mastery of Surgery, 8th ed.

Preoperative Preparation

  • MRI pelvis (locoregional staging), CT chest/abdomen/pelvis (distant staging)
  • PET-CT for equivocal inguinal node assessment
  • Baseline CEA level
  • Mechanical bowel prep + oral antibiotics (metronidazole + neomycin) the day before
  • ERAS protocol: preoperative anti-inflammatories, nausea prophylaxis, VTE prophylaxis
  • Stoma marking by enterostomal nurse preoperatively
  • TAP (transversus abdominis plane) blocks for pain control
  • Ureteral catheters in cases with extensive pelvic dissection, reoperation, or prior pelvic radiotherapy
  • Informed consent must include the possibility of APR even in planned low anterior resections
  • Fischer's Mastery of Surgery, 8th ed.

Complications

CategorySpecific Complications
IntraoperativeUreteral injury, hemorrhage, bladder injury, urethral injury (male), perforation of specimen
Autonomic nerve injuryDamage occurs at: IMA ligation, sigmoid mobilization, lateral pelvic sidewall, lateral to seminal vesicles (male) / cardinal ligaments (female)
Sexual dysfunctionParasympathetic nerve damage causing erectile dysfunction (males); risk in all radical pelvic surgery
Urinary dysfunctionBladder dysfunction from sympathetic/parasympathetic injury
Perineal woundDelayed healing, especially after radiotherapy; may need vascularized myocutaneous flap closure
Stoma complicationsStomal varices (if liver disease/portal hypertension develops), prolapse, retraction, hernia
OncologicR1 resection (positive margins), local recurrence
Note on sexual dysfunction: Radical pelvic dissection damages pelvic parasympathetic supply needed for erection. This must be specifically counseled preoperatively - it is a significant source of morbidity.
  • Gray's Anatomy for Students
  • Fischer's Mastery of Surgery, 8th ed.

Oncologic Outcomes

  • For rectal cancer: 5-year recurrence rates ~3-5%, comparable to sphincter-preserving surgery when adequate margins are achieved
  • For anal canal SCC (salvage APR): ~50% cure rate
  • Local recurrence after APR: 6-12% depending on series
  • Yamada's Textbook of Gastroenterology, 7th ed.

APR vs. Sphincter-Preserving Surgery

APR is not inferior oncologically when margins are adequate. The choice depends on:
  • Tumor level and relation to sphincters
  • Preoperative sphincter function
  • Response to neoadjuvant therapy
  • Surgeon experience
  • Patient preference (permanent colostomy vs. risk of low anterior resection syndrome)
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) - urgency, frequency, fragmentation, incontinence - affects 25-50% of patients after sphincter-preserving operations and must be weighed against the permanent colostomy of APR.

Recent evidence (2025): A systematic review (Colombari et al., Surgery 2025, PMID 40929950) compared robotic vs. laparoscopic APR, finding comparable short-term oncologic outcomes with potential advantages in the robotic approach for technical performance.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.