Procedure to send the specimen for immunohistochemistry
| Proposed Test | Carrier Medium | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Routine microscopy, immunohistochemistry, PCR assay | 10% neutral buffered formalin | Fixation begins immediately |
| Direct immunofluorescence | Michel's medium or fresh | Lab preference |
| Flow cytometry | Fresh | For lymphoma cutis |
| Electron microscopy | Glutaraldehyde | |
| Microbial culture | Fresh / sterile culture medium |
Key distinction: IHC is performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue — not fresh tissue, not frozen tissue, and not glutaraldehyde. Do not use Michel's medium (reserved for direct immunofluorescence) or saline for IHC specimens.
Cost of ihc
immunohistochemistry IHC test cost price India 2024 2025
| Setting | Cost per IHC Marker |
|---|---|
| Government / Teaching hospitals (AIIMS, GMC) | ₹300 – ₹800 per marker |
| Mid-tier private labs (SRL, Thyrocare, Metropolis) | ₹1,000 – ₹2,500 per marker |
| Premium private labs / corporate hospitals | ₹2,500 – ₹5,000 per marker |
| Specialized oncology centres | ₹3,000 – ₹6,000 per marker |
Note: Prices vary widely and change over time. Always confirm current rates directly with the laboratory before sending the specimen.
Ihc markers for endometrial or cervical carcinoma
| Marker | Endometrioid (Type I) | Serous (Type II) | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| ER / PR | ✅ Positive | ❌ Negative | Confirm endometrioid type; also guides hormonal therapy |
| Vimentin | ✅ Positive | ❌/Focal | Supports endometrial origin |
| p53 | Weak/wild-type (patchy) | ✅ Diffusely strong (>90% of cases) | Hallmark of serous carcinoma — TP53 mutation causes accumulation |
| p16 | Focal/patchy | ✅ Diffuse block-positive | Overexpressed in serous type |
| Ki-67 | Low–moderate | High (>75%) | Proliferation index; high in serous/high-grade |
| PTEN | ❌ Lost (30–80%) | Retained | PTEN loss supports endometrioid type |
| PAX8 | ✅ Positive | ✅ Positive | Confirms Müllerian/endometrial origin |
| Marker | Loss of Expression = dMMR |
|---|---|
| MLH1 | Lost (most common; often due to promoter methylation in sporadic) |
| PMS2 | Lost (paired with MLH1) |
| MSH2 | Lost |
| MSH6 | Lost (paired with MSH2) |
Loss of any one marker = mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) → warrants reflex microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and germline counselling
| Molecular Subtype | IHC Surrogate |
|---|---|
| POLE ultramutated | MMR intact + p53 wild-type (confirmed by POLE sequencing) |
| MSI-high / dMMR | MMR loss (MLH1/PMS2/MSH2/MSH6) |
| Copy-number low (endometrioid) | p53 wild-type, MMR intact |
| Copy-number high / serous-like | p53 mutant (diffuse/null) |
| Marker | Squamous Cell Ca (Cervix) | Endocervical Adenocarcinoma | Endometrial Adenocarcinoma |
|---|---|---|---|
| p16 | ✅ Diffuse block-positive | ✅ Diffuse block-positive | ❌ Focal/patchy |
| p63 / CK5/6 | ✅ Positive | ❌ Negative | ❌ Negative |
| CEA | Variable | ✅ Positive | ❌ Negative |
| Vimentin | ❌ Negative | ❌ Negative | ✅ Positive |
| ER / PR | ❌ Negative | ❌ Negative | ✅ Positive |
| PAX8 | ❌ Negative | ✅ Positive | ✅ Positive |
| HPV (ISH/PCR) | ✅ High-risk HPV | ✅ High-risk HPV | ❌ Negative |
| CK7 | Variable | ✅ Positive | ✅ Positive |
| CK20 | ❌ Negative | ❌ Negative | ❌ Negative |
| Marker | Significance |
|---|---|
| p16 | Surrogate marker for high-risk HPV integration; diffuse block positivity supports HSIL or HPV-driven carcinoma |
| Ki-67 (MIB-1) | Elevated in HSIL and carcinoma; used alongside p16 in CIN grading (p16/Ki-67 dual stain) |
| HPV in situ hybridization | Confirms HPV DNA presence in tissue |
| Marker | Result |
|---|---|
| Synaptophysin | ✅ Positive |
| Chromogranin A | ✅ Positive |
| CD56 | ✅ Positive |
| TTF-1 | ✅ Often positive |
| p16 | ✅ Positive (HPV-driven) |
| Marker | Endometrial | Endocervical |
|---|---|---|
| Vimentin | ✅ | ❌ |
| ER/PR | ✅ | ❌ |
| p16 | Focal | Diffuse |
| CEA | ❌ | ✅ |
| PAX8 | ✅ | ✅ |
The vimentin/ER/p16 combination is the most practical first-line panel to distinguish endometrial from endocervical primary in biopsy material.
Uses of doing ihc in endometrial carcinoma
| Feature | Type I (Endometrioid) | Type II (Serous / Clear Cell) |
|---|---|---|
| ER / PR | ✅ Positive | ❌ Negative |
| p53 | Wild-type (patchy, weak) | Mutant (diffuse strong or null) |
| p16 | Focal | Diffuse block-positive |
| Ki-67 | Low–moderate | High |
| Vimentin | ✅ Positive | Variable |
Serous carcinoma has >90% TP53 mutations — IHC for p53 is the most reliable surrogate. Diffuse strong or completely absent (null) p53 staining = mutant p53 = aggressive behaviour and worse prognosis. — Goldman-Cecil Medicine, Goldman-Cecil Medicine
| Marker | Endometrial | Endocervical |
|---|---|---|
| Vimentin | ✅ | ❌ |
| ER / PR | ✅ | ❌ |
| p16 | Focal | Diffuse |
| CEA | ❌ | ✅ |
| PAX8 | ✅ | ✅ (both positive) |
"Immunohistochemistry is frequently used because of the lower cost of this testing... All women who are diagnosed with endometrial cancer should undergo systematic clinical screening for Lynch syndrome and/or molecular screening." — Goldman-Cecil Medicine, Endometrial Cancer chapter
| Marker | Loss = dMMR |
|---|---|
| MLH1 | Most common; often promoter methylation in sporadic cases |
| PMS2 | Lost with MLH1 |
| MSH2 | Lost in germline MSH2 mutations (Lynch) |
| MSH6 | Lost with MSH2 |
| TCGA Subgroup | IHC Surrogate | Prognosis |
|---|---|---|
| POLE ultramutated | MMR intact + p53 wild-type (confirm with POLE sequencing) | Best (even if high-grade) |
| dMMR / MSI-high | Loss of MLH1/PMS2 or MSH2/MSH6 | Intermediate; responds to immunotherapy |
| Copy-number low | p53 wild-type + MMR intact | Intermediate–good |
| Copy-number high / serous-like | p53 mutant (diffuse or null) | Worst |
"Suggested schema for molecular classification of endometrial cancer using sequencing and immunohistochemistry results to segregate patients into the molecular subtypes defined by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)." — Goldman-Cecil Medicine, Fig. 184-1
| Use | Markers | Clinical Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Subtyping (Type I vs II) | ER/PR, p53, p16, Ki-67 | Prognosis, treatment planning |
| Site of origin (endometrial vs cervical) | Vimentin, ER, p16, CEA, PAX8 | Surgical approach |
| Lynch syndrome screening | MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6 | Genetic counselling, family screening |
| Molecular classification (TCGA) | p53 + MMR panel | Immunotherapy eligibility |
| Hormonal therapy guidance | ER / PR | Progestin / aromatase inhibitor use |
| HER2-targeted therapy | HER2/neu (ERBB2) | Trastuzumab eligibility (serous type) |
Ihc for Figo stage 1a necessary in endometrial ca?
endometrial carcinoma FIGO stage IA immunohistochemistry mismatch repair
endometrial cancer stage IA universal MMR IHC testing guidelines
endometrial cancer Lynch syndrome universal screening IHC
"All women who are diagnosed with endometrial cancer should undergo systematic clinical screening for Lynch syndrome and/or molecular screening. Immunohistochemistry is frequently used because of the lower cost of this testing." — Goldman-Cecil Medicine
| Finding | Implication |
|---|---|
| Stage IA + p53 mutant (diffuse/null) | Reclassified to higher risk; may need adjuvant therapy |
| Stage IA + dMMR | Intermediate; Lynch screening mandatory |
| Stage IA + POLE mutation | Excellent prognosis — may avoid adjuvant treatment |
| Stage IA + p53 wild-type + MMR intact | Low risk — observation appropriate |
A Stage IA tumour that appears "low risk" morphologically may carry a p53 mutation (serous-like), which significantly changes management and prognosis. IHC for p53 unmasks this.
| IHC Marker | Stage IA Necessary? | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| MLH1 / PMS2 / MSH2 / MSH6 | ✅ Yes — universally | Lynch syndrome screening; dMMR = immunotherapy eligibility |
| p53 | ✅ Yes | Identifies serous-like tumours even at Stage IA; changes risk stratification |
| ER / PR | Selective | If recurrence or hormonal therapy considered |
| HER2 | Selective (serous histology) | Only if p53 mutant / serous confirmed |
| Ki-67 | Optional | Proliferation index; prognostic but not mandatory |
Is PET scan necessary for stage 1 endometrial carcinoma
PET scan endometrial cancer stage I utility guidelines
"endometrial cancer" AND "PET" AND "stage I" AND staging
"endometrial cancer" AND "PET/CT" AND "lymph node" AND staging
| Stage | Recommended Imaging |
|---|---|
| Stage I (low-intermediate risk) | Pelvic MRI (preferred) or transvaginal ultrasound |
| Stage I (high risk: G3, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma) | MRI pelvis + CT chest/abdomen/pelvis |
| Stage III–IV or suspected metastatic | PET/CT or CT chest/abdomen/pelvis |
| Situation | PET/CT Indicated? |
|---|---|
| Stage I, Grade 1–2 endometrioid, preoperative | ❌ No |
| Stage I, Grade 3 / serous / carcinosarcoma | ⚠️ Selective — CT chest/abdomen is usually preferred; PET can be considered |
| Suspected extrauterine spread at imaging or surgery | ✅ Yes |
| Stage III–IV disease | ✅ Yes |
| Recurrence surveillance — suspected recurrence | ✅ Yes — PET is highly useful here |
| Restaging after incomplete surgery or residual disease | ✅ Yes |
| dMMR/MSI-H tumours being considered for immunotherapy | ✅ Yes (to document extent of disease) |
| Investigation | Role |
|---|---|
| Pelvic MRI | Myometrial invasion depth, cervical involvement — standard of care |
| Chest X-ray or CT chest | Baseline; CT preferred for high-grade histology |
| CA-125 | Baseline marker; elevated in serous/advanced disease |
| Endometrial biopsy (already done for diagnosis) | Grade, histotype |
| MMR IHC | Universal — Lynch syndrome / immunotherapy eligibility |
| PET/CT | ❌ Not routine for Stage I |
PET/CT is not a standard or necessary investigation for Stage I endometrial carcinoma. It does not improve surgical planning, cannot reliably detect micrometastases, and adds cost and radiation without benefit. Pelvic MRI is the recommended staging modality. PET/CT is reserved for suspected recurrence, advanced disease, or high-risk histotypes where distant metastatic workup is clinically indicated.
When to do PET post surgery in endometrial stage 1q carcinoma
"endometrial cancer" AND "PET" AND recurrence AND surveillance post-surgery
"endometrial cancer" AND "PET/CT" AND recurrence detection
| Interval | Recommended Surveillance |
|---|---|
| Every 3–6 months × 2–3 years | Clinical examination + symptom review |
| Every 6–12 months thereafter (up to 5 years) | Clinical examination |
| Annually | Vaginal vault cytology (optional; low yield) |
| As clinically indicated | CA-125 (if elevated at baseline) |
Imaging (CT, MRI, PET) is not part of routine surveillance in asymptomatic Stage I patients — it has not been shown to improve survival in this setting.
"A search for distant recurrences is obligatory, as patients with metastatic disease are best treated with chemotherapy." — Berek & Novak's Gynecology
| Reason | Detail |
|---|---|
| Low recurrence rate | Stage IA Grade 1–2: only ~5–10% recur |
| Recurrence is symptomatic | ~67% of recurrences are symptomatic; routine imaging rarely finds occult disease that changes outcome |
| Vaginal recurrences are detectable clinically | Vault examination detects the commonest recurrence site |
| PET cannot detect microrecurrence | Small nodal or peritoneal deposits are below PET resolution |
| No survival benefit proven | No RCT shows routine imaging surveillance improves OS in Stage I |
| Cost and radiation | Unjustified in low-risk, asymptomatic patients |
| Subgroup | 5-Year Survival | Recurrence Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Stage IA, Grade 1 | ~93% | ~3–5% |
| Stage IA, Grade 2 | ~90% | ~5–8% |
| Stage IA, Grade 3 | ~69% | ~15–20% |
| Stage IB (>50% invasion), Grade 3 | ~63% | ~20–25% |
High-grade Stage I (G3, serous, carcinosarcoma) patients warrant closer imaging follow-up — CT chest/abdomen at 6–12 months is often done; PET if symptoms arise.
| Clinical Scenario | PET Indicated? |
|---|---|
| Routine post-op surveillance, asymptomatic Stage IA | ❌ No |
| Symptoms or clinical signs of recurrence | ✅ Yes |
| Rising CA-125 / abnormal vault cytology | ✅ Yes |
| Equivocal CT/MRI finding | ✅ Yes |
| Before salvage therapy for suspected recurrence | ✅ Yes — mandatory |
| Final pathology upstages to high-risk features | ✅ Yes — consider |
Tumor markers of endometriosis
endometriosis biomarkers CA-125 diagnosis serum
Important caveat upfront: Endometriosis is a benign condition. The term "tumor markers" here refers to biochemical/serum biomarkers used for diagnosis, monitoring, and disease assessment — not oncological tumor markers per se. Laparoscopy with histology remains the gold standard for diagnosis; no single serum marker is sensitive or specific enough to replace it.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it is | Glycoprotein derived from coelomic epithelia — endometrium, fallopian tube, ovary, peritoneum |
| Normal value | <35 U/mL |
| Sensitivity | ~50% for Stage III–IV endometriosis; very low (~20–30%) for Stage I–II |
| Specificity | ~80–90% (but elevated in many other conditions) |
| Best use | Monitoring disease activity and response to treatment |
| Marker | Relevance |
|---|---|
| IL-6 (Interleukin-6) | Elevated in peritoneal fluid and serum; correlates with disease severity |
| TNF-α | Elevated in peritoneal fluid; promotes implant survival |
| VEGF | Angiogenic factor; elevated in endometriotic tissue and peritoneal fluid; promotes implant vascularisation |
| Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) | Elevated locally; drives inflammation and pain; target of COX-2 inhibitor therapy |
| MMP-2, MMP-9 (Matrix metalloproteinases) | Elevated; facilitate implant invasion into peritoneal surfaces |
| Marker | Relevance |
|---|---|
| Aromatase (CYP19A1) | Overexpressed in endometriotic stromal cells → elevated local oestrogen production; drives implant growth |
| Oestradiol (E2) | Elevated locally within implants; systemic levels may be normal |
| Progesterone resistance | Endometriotic tissue is relatively resistant to progesterone — basis for treatment failure |
| Marker | Status |
|---|---|
| CA-19-9 | Elevated in some cases; studied alongside CA-125 to improve specificity |
| miRNA (miR-141-3p, miR-200b, miR-451) | Circulating microRNAs dysregulated in endometriosis; promise for non-invasive diagnosis [PMID: 41254724] |
| Urocortin | Studied to differentiate ovarian endometrioma from other benign ovarian cysts |
| Annexin V | Peritoneal fluid marker |
| Glycodelin (PP14) | Produced by endometrial glands; elevated in endometriosis |
| Junction Plakoglobin (JUP) | Identified by single-cell RNA sequencing as a stratification biomarker [PMID: 39684780] |
| Activin A | Elevated in peritoneal fluid |
| Marker | Relevance |
|---|---|
| CA-125 | Significantly elevated (often >200 U/mL) |
| HE4 (Human Epididymis Protein 4) | Helps distinguish benign endometrioma from ovarian cancer; less affected by endometriosis than CA-125 |
| ROMA score (CA-125 + HE4) | Better discriminates malignant from benign adnexal mass |
| AFP, β-hCG, LDH | If germ cell tumour considered in differential |
| Marker | Use in Endometriosis | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| CA-125 | Most widely used; monitoring treatment response | Low sensitivity for early disease; non-specific |
| CA-19-9 | Adjunct to CA-125; some added specificity | Not routinely used alone |
| HE4 | Rules out malignant transformation | Not elevated in benign endometriosis |
| IL-6, VEGF, TNF-α | Research/peritoneal fluid studies | Not in routine clinical use |
| miRNAs | Promising non-invasive biomarkers | Not yet validated for clinical practice |
| Aromatase | Tissue marker; therapeutic target | Not a serum test |
No currently available serum tumor marker reliably diagnoses endometriosis — especially early-stage disease. CA-125 is clinically useful mainly for monitoring known disease and alerting to possible malignant transformation when markedly elevated. The diagnosis of endometriosis still requires laparoscopy + biopsy.
Hypoprolactinemia causes and management
Hypoprolactinemia = abnormally low serum prolactin levels. This is the opposite of the far more common hyperprolactinemia, and is a relatively rare, underrecognised condition.
| Cause | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Sheehan's syndrome | Postpartum pituitary infarction — lactotrophs destroyed → failure of lactation is the classic first sign |
| Pituitary surgery / hypophysectomy | Direct destruction of lactotrophs |
| Pituitary irradiation | Progressive lactotroph loss |
| Pituitary apoplexy | Haemorrhagic infarction of pituitary |
| Infiltrative diseases | Sarcoidosis, haemochromatosis, histiocytosis X |
| Pituitary tumour destruction | Large non-functioning adenomas destroying normal gland |
| Traumatic brain injury | Disruption of hypothalamic-pituitary axis |
| Empty sella syndrome | Compression and atrophy of pituitary tissue |
"Low serum levels of prolactin may prevent adequate lactation in nursing mothers and may be a reliable marker for hypopituitarism when seen with deficiencies in other pituitary hormones." — Goldman-Cecil Medicine
| Drug Class | Examples | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Dopamine agonists | Bromocriptine, cabergoline, levodopa | Directly increase D2 receptor activity → suppress prolactin |
| Dopamine itself | Dopamine infusion (ICU use) | Direct D2 stimulation |
| Ergot alkaloids | Ergotamine | Dopamine agonist properties |
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Agalactia / failure of lactation | Primary symptom in postpartum women — classic in Sheehan's syndrome |
| Inadequate lactation | Milk production reduced but not always absent (nipple stimulation can partially compensate) |
| Part of hypopituitarism syndrome | Amenorrhoea, hypothyroidism, hypoadrenalism, growth hormone deficiency |
| In men | Virtually asymptomatic as isolated finding; no known clinical consequence of isolated low prolactin in men |
"Lactation is not completely absent because nipple stimulation may be sufficient to start milk production." — Goldman-Cecil Medicine
| Cause | Management |
|---|---|
| Drug-induced (dopamine agonist) | Discontinue offending drug if clinically appropriate; prolactin normalises within days–weeks |
| Hyperthyroidism | Treat thyrotoxicosis (antithyroid drugs, radioiodine, surgery) → TRH normalises → prolactin recovers |
| Sheehan's syndrome / hypopituitarism | Replace all deficient pituitary hormones (hydrocortisone, thyroxine, sex steroids, GH); lactotroph function rarely recovers |
| Pituitary tumour / infiltration | Address underlying lesion; residual prolactin deficiency managed symptomatically |
| Hook effect | Dilute sample and re-measure; treat underlying prolactinoma with dopamine agonist |
| Intervention | Role |
|---|---|
| Frequent nipple stimulation / suckling | Reflexly stimulates prolactin even at low baseline levels |
| Metoclopramide (galactagogue) | Dopamine antagonist → stimulates prolactin release; used off-label to enhance milk production |
| Domperidone (galactagogue) | Peripheral dopamine antagonist; preferred over metoclopramide (less CNS penetration) |
| Oxytocin nasal spray | Aids milk ejection reflex (let-down), does not increase prolactin |
| Supplemental infant formula | When milk supply is insufficient despite above measures |
Note: Metoclopramide and domperidone are not licensed specifically for lactation in many countries but are widely used in clinical practice with evidence of modest benefit.
| Detail | |
|---|---|
| Most common cause | Dopamine agonist drugs (iatrogenic) |
| Most clinically significant cause | Sheehan's syndrome / hypopituitarism |
| Key clinical sign | Failure of postpartum lactation |
| Important diagnostic trap | Hook effect — falsely low PRL in macroadenoma |
| Treatment | Treat underlying cause; galactagogues for lactation failure |
| Isolated deficiency in men | Not clinically described; no treatment needed |