Nephrotic syndrome osce history station check list
"nephrotic syndrome"
nephrotic syndrome clinical features diagnosis patient history evaluation guideline
“You have developed progressive periorbital and leg swelling with frothy urine and weight gain, suggesting significant urinary protein loss. I would be concerned about nephrotic syndrome and would also assess for complications such as infection, blood clots and impaired kidney function.”
Create a nephrotic OSCE marking scheme
"nephrotic syndrome"
KDIGO 2025 nephrotic syndrome children guideline diagnosis clinical characteristics
| Domain | Checklist item | Marks |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Introduction and communication | Introduces self, confirms patient identity, explains purpose, obtains consent | 1 |
| Uses open questions initially and a logical, empathetic approach | 1 | |
| Checks patient comfort, uses appropriate language and signposting | 1 | |
| Subtotal | 3 | |
| 2. Presenting complaint and symptom analysis | Establishes onset, duration, progression and previous episodes | 1 |
| Elicits oedema: periorbital, ankles/legs, sacral, genital and abdominal swelling | 1 | |
| Asks about weight gain, tight clothes/shoes, or change in abdominal girth | 1 | |
| Asks about frothy/foamy urine | 1 | |
| Asks about urine volume, oliguria, dark urine and visible haematuria | 1 | |
| Screens for breathlessness, orthopnoea or cough, suggesting significant fluid overload or pleural effusion | 1 | |
| Subtotal | 6 | |
| 3. Associated urinary and systemic symptoms | Asks about dysuria, frequency, urgency, fever, loin pain or recurrent urinary infection | 1 |
| Asks about fatigue, reduced appetite, nausea or reduced exercise tolerance | 1 | |
| Asks about headache, visual disturbance or symptoms of hypertension | 1 | |
| Subtotal | 3 | |
| 4. Complications of nephrotic syndrome | Screens for DVT: unilateral painful leg swelling, redness or calf pain | 1 |
| Screens for pulmonary embolism: sudden dyspnoea, pleuritic chest pain, haemoptysis or syncope | 1 | |
| Screens for renal vein thrombosis: flank pain, haematuria or abrupt worsening of renal function/urine output | 1 | |
| Screens for infection: fever, rigors, cellulitis, cough, urinary symptoms and abdominal pain | 1 | |
| Subtotal | 4 | |
| 5. Causes: renal and systemic disease | Asks about diabetes and evidence of microvascular complications | 1 |
| Screens for SLE/connective-tissue disease: rash, photosensitivity, oral ulcers, joint symptoms, Raynaud phenomenon | 1 | |
| Screens for vasculitis: sinus symptoms, epistaxis, purpura, neuropathy, haemoptysis | 1 | |
| Asks about chronic infection risks: hepatitis B/C, HIV, tuberculosis, recent infection or relevant travel | 1 | |
| Screens for malignancy: weight loss, night sweats, persistent fever, lymphadenopathy or organ-specific symptoms | 1 | |
| Asks about chronic inflammatory disease or symptoms of amyloidosis/myeloma where appropriate | 1 | |
| Subtotal | 6 | |
| 6. Drug, past, family and social history | Asks about nephrotoxic or causative drugs, particularly NSAIDs, lithium, interferon, gold/penicillamine and recreational drugs | 1 |
| Establishes past renal disease, hypertension, diabetes, autoimmune disease, thrombosis and previous renal biopsy/admissions | 1 | |
| Asks about current medicines, including diuretics, ACE inhibitor/ARB, steroids, immunosuppression and anticoagulation; checks allergies | 1 | |
| Asks about family history of renal disease, dialysis/transplant, deafness or autoimmune disease | 1 | |
| Covers smoking, alcohol, intravenous drug use, occupation, functional impact and dietary salt intake | 1 | |
| Subtotal | 5 | |
| 7. Closure and clinical judgement | Summarises the key findings accurately and checks understanding | 1 |
| States concern for nephrotic syndrome and identifies proteinuria, hypoalbuminaemia, oedema and hyperlipidaemia as key features | 1 | |
| Mentions appropriate next steps: examination, urine dipstick/microscopy, urine protein:creatinine ratio, serum albumin, renal function and lipid profile | 1 | |
| Subtotal | 3 |
| Rating | Descriptor |
|---|---|
| 0 | Unsafe, disorganised, misses major symptoms and complications |
| 1 | Very limited history, substantial prompting required |
| 2 | Basic history but misses key complications or important secondary causes |
| 3 | Safe, structured and satisfactory history |
| 4 | Thorough, focused and clinically insightful |
| 5 | Excellent rapport, prioritisation, synthesis and safety-netting |