6+ lift and slide maneuver to slide spinal board under patient of trauma

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

6 plus lift and slide spinal board trauma immobilization technique steps

Finding Sources
Reading Web Page

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2231400

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"spinal board" AND "lift" AND "log roll" immobilization technique

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
I now have enough information from both the PMC article (Del Rossi et al., J Athletic Training 2008) and the Roberts & Hedges textbook to give a thorough, accurate answer.

6+ Person Lift and Slide - Spinal Board Transfer Technique

Overview

The 6+ lift and slide is the preferred method when sufficient personnel are available (typically 8 people total). Research by Del Rossi et al. (PMC2231400) comparing transfer techniques on an unstable C5-C6 cadaver model found that the 6+ lift and lift-and-slide techniques generated significantly less lateral flexion and axial rotation than the traditional log roll. It is the technique of choice when spinal stability is the priority and enough rescuers are present.

Personnel Setup (8 Total)

PositionRole
Rescuer 1 (head)Manual in-line cervical spine stabilization + command
Rescuer 2Beside chest/shoulder, one side
Rescuer 3Beside chest/shoulder, opposite side
Rescuer 4Beside pelvis/hips, one side
Rescuer 5Beside pelvis/hips, opposite side
Rescuer 6Beside lower legs/feet, one side
Rescuer 7Beside lower legs/feet, opposite side
Rescuer 8Board placement from foot end
So: 1 at the head + 6 lifting (paired at chest, pelvis, legs) + 1 for the board = 8 total. The name "6+" refers to the 6 lifters plus the person at the head and the board handler.

Step-by-Step Procedure

Pre-procedure preparation

  1. Apply a properly sized rigid cervical collar before initiating movement (reduces but does not eliminate cervical motion).
  2. Rescuer 1 takes position at the patient's head, placing hands on either side of the skull to provide manual in-line stabilization in the neutral position.
  3. Six lifters position themselves alongside the patient: pairs at the chest/axilla level, pelvis level, and lower leg level. Rescuers kneel or crouch on both sides.
  4. Rescuer 8 stands at the foot end of the patient, holding the spinal board ready.

Lifting phase

  1. Rescuer 1 commands (e.g., "On my count - one, two, three, LIFT").
  2. All 6 rescuers simultaneously lift the patient 4-6 inches (10-15 cm) off the ground in a single coordinated motion.
    • Hands are placed under the patient's body - not on straps or clothing - to distribute force evenly across thorax, pelvis, and legs.
    • All rescuers must maintain their segment's alignment without allowing sagging between segments.
  3. The body must rise as a rigid unit - no bending, sagging, or twisting at any spinal level.

Board placement

  1. While the patient is held suspended, Rescuer 8 slides the spinal board from the foot end, pushing it smoothly along the ground under the entire length of the patient's body.
  2. The board is advanced until it is fully centered under the patient (head end of board at the patient's head).

Lowering phase

  1. On Rescuer 1's command, all lifters simultaneously and gently lower the patient onto the board.
  2. Make minor adjustments to center the patient on the board if needed - do this with small coordinated slides, not lifts.

Securing to the board

  1. Secure the torso with straps in the order: chest first, then pelvis, then lower extremities (so securing the body before the head to avoid levering forces on the cervical spine).
  2. Apply lateral head blocks/foam blocks on either side of the head.
  3. Apply a forehead strap and chin strap to secure the head to the board last.
  4. Reassess neurological status after full immobilization.

Key Principles & Evidence

  • Why 6+ is preferred over log roll: The log roll generates significantly more lateral flexion and axial rotation at an unstable cervical segment. The 6+ lift keeps the spine in a more neutral axis by lifting straight up rather than rotating.
  • Lift height: Only 4-6 inches. More than necessary introduces risk; less prevents board insertion.
  • Board entry from the foot: Never from the side - this forces lateral tilt of the board which could shift the spine.
  • Do not lift unevenly: If one pair lifts faster or higher than another, segmental bending occurs. Rescuer 1's count is law.
  • Rescuer 1 does NOT lift - they maintain cervical stabilization throughout and serve as the sole commander of the procedure.
  • Cervical collars alone restrict only ~70-75% of flexion-extension; manual in-line stabilization by Rescuer 1 must be maintained at all times until the patient is fully secured (Roberts and Hedges' Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine).

Comparison with Other Techniques

Feature6+ Lift4-Person Lift & SlideLog Roll
Min personnel855
C-spine motionLowestLowHigher (rotation involved)
Lateral flexionMinimalLowSignificant
Axial rotationMinimalLowSignificant
Board placementFoot-end slide underFoot-end slide underWedge at ~45° angle, roll back
Preferred whenMany responders availableModerate teamLimited personnel

Contraindications / Special Situations

  • Penetrating trauma to head, neck, or torso with no signs of spinal injury: spinal immobilization on a backboard is not required per current guidelines.
  • Pediatric patients (<8 years): the large occiput causes neck flexion on a flat board - place a pad under the back at chest level or use a board with an occipital cutout.
  • Suspected pelvic fracture: pelvic straps may not be tolerated; modify accordingly.
  • Obese/kyphotic patients: pad hollow spaces under the spine to maintain neutral alignment on the hard board.
The YouTube video below shows spinal board placement and C-spine immobilization technique in practice:

Log rolling technique in ATLS

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

ATLS log rolling technique spinal immobilization trauma steps 4 person

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
I now have comprehensive textbook and evidence-based content to provide a complete answer.

Log Rolling Technique in ATLS

Context in ATLS

In ATLS, the log roll is performed as part of the secondary survey during the "E - Exposure" step of the primary survey. The goals are:
  1. Examine the entire posterior surface (back, buttocks, posterior thighs) for injuries
  2. Slide the spinal board under the patient if not already done
  3. Remove the patient from a backboard once in-hospital
All new trauma patients are treated as having a spinal injury until proven otherwise. ATLS protocol mandates cervical immobilization and log roll precautions throughout (Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults, 10th ed).

Personnel Required

MinimumIdeal
3 rescuers (excludes examiner)4-5 rescuers
Head holder + 2 bodyHead + chest + pelvis + legs + board/examiner
The Sabiston Textbook of Surgery states: "Back examination may be performed using a log roll maneuver, with extreme attention to procedural details by at least three people (excluding the examiner) who turn the patient."

Step-by-Step ATLS Log Roll Procedure

Pre-roll preparation

Step 1 - Cervical collar application
  • Apply a correctly sized rigid cervical collar before any movement begins.
  • If sizing is difficult or collar not available, maintain manual in-line stabilization at all times.
Step 2 - Position the team
  • Rescuer 1 (Team Leader) - at the patient's head, applies bilateral manual in-line stabilization. Hands placed on either side of the skull, not the collar.
  • Rescuer 2 - kneels on the side the patient will be rolled toward, at the level of the chest/shoulder - reaches across and places one hand on the far shoulder, other hand on the far hip.
  • Rescuer 3 - kneels same side as Rescuer 2, at pelvis/hip level - one hand on far lower back/hip, other hand under the far thigh.
  • Rescuer 4 (if available) - same side as 2 & 3, at the lower legs/knees.
  • Rescuer 5 (examiner or board handler) - opposite side, ready with the backboard.
Step 3 - Arm positioning
  • Extend the patient's arms alongside their body with palms resting on the lateral thighs. Some prefer arms crossed over the thorax to prevent the patient grabbing a rescuer. Straighten the lower extremities.
Step 4 - Board placement
  • Place the spinal board on the opposite side (the side that is more painful/injured) - so when the patient is rolled, they rotate toward the less-injured side.
  • The board should be positioned at approximately 45° to the patient ready to slide under.

Rolling phase

Step 5 - Command and roll
  • Rescuer 1 gives the command: "On my count - 1, 2, 3, ROLL"
  • All rescuers roll the patient as one rigid unit onto the side, toward Rescuers 2, 3, and 4.
  • Rescuer 1 does NOT pull or push - they maintain in-line stabilization and move the head in synchrony with the torso, preventing any independent head/neck movement.
  • The roll angle is typically 30-90° to the horizontal.
  • The body must not sag between segments - chest, pelvis, and legs must move at the same rate and angle.
Step 6 - Back examination
  • With the patient on their side, the examiner inspects and palpates the entire posterior spine (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacral), looking for:
    • Step deformities
    • Midline tenderness
    • Lacerations, contusions, penetrating wounds
    • Perianal sensation / rectal tone (if indicated for SCI assessment)
Step 7 - Board slide
  • Rescuer 5 slides the backboard under the patient against the patient's back at approximately 45°.
  • The board should be angled to account for rolling the patient back onto it.

Roll-back and securing

Step 8 - Roll back
  • Rescuer 1 commands roll back: "1, 2, 3, ROLL BACK"
  • Patient is lowered supine onto the board.
  • At this point minor adjustments may be needed to center the patient.
Step 9 - Center the patient
  • To center without re-rolling: support cervical spine, shoulders, and hips and slide patient in a zigzag caudal-then-cephalad pattern to avoid uneven lateral or rotational force on the spine.
Step 10 - Secure to board (order matters) Apply straps in this order to avoid levering:
  1. Chest/thorax strap - first
  2. Pelvis strap
  3. Upper legs / lower legs strap
  4. Head and lateral neck stabilizers - last
Use foam blocks or a head immobilizer on either side of the head. Secure with tape across the forehead and a strap across the c-collar. Do NOT tape across the neck (obstructs airway access). Do NOT strap the head before the body (creates leverage on the cervical spine if the board tilts).

Critical Technical Points

PointDetail
Who commandsRescuer 1 at the head - sole authority for all movement
Roll towardThe less-injured/less-painful side
Board placed againstThe more-injured/more-painful side
Angle of roll30-90°; enough to inspect the back and insert the board
Arms during rollExtended alongside body or crossed over chest
Head movementIn tandem with torso - no independent cervical motion
Strapping orderTorso before head - always
TapingForehead only - never across the neck
Pediatric modificationPad behind the back to accommodate large occiput; prevents forced cervical flexion on flat board

Log Roll vs. 6+ Lift: ATLS Perspective

The ATLS logroll remains the ubiquitous standard because it requires only 3-5 people. The Roberts & Hedges textbook notes: "The lift-and-slide technique... may reduce the amount of motion at an unstable vertebral segment when compared with the logroll... but the difference has never been shown to be clinically relevant and the logroll remains nearly ubiquitous."
One key disadvantage of the lift-and-slide over the log roll is the inability to visually inspect the posterior spine during the maneuver - a critical component of the ATLS secondary survey.

When NOT to Log Roll (Current ATLS Guidance)

Per current evidence and ATLS evolution:
  • Penetrating trauma to head/neck/torso without neurological signs: do NOT immobilize on backboard
  • Normal GCS, no midline tenderness, no distracting injury: spinal motion restriction may not be required
  • Patients should be removed from the backboard as soon as possible once in-hospital, as prolonged boarding causes pressure ulcers, respiratory compromise, and pain
  • Sabiston Surgery: "Prehospital practice has evolved such that all patients with a potential mechanism to produce spinal injury are no longer systematically immobilized on long spine boards with cervical collars"

Sources: Roberts and Hedges' Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine, Fig. 46.17; Sabiston Textbook of Surgery; Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults, 10th ed; SAEM Spinal Immobilization curriculum

Brown sequard syndrome and cauda equina syndrome

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching the Web

Brown Sequard syndrome cauda equina syndrome clinical features comparison

Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Loading Image
Loading Image
Reading File
I now have comprehensive textbook data to deliver a detailed, well-structured answer on both syndromes.

Brown-Séquard Syndrome & Cauda Equina Syndrome


Part 1: Brown-Séquard Syndrome (BSS)

Definition & Anatomy

BSS results from functional or anatomic hemisection of the spinal cord - a unilateral cord lesion. It is a classic incomplete spinal cord injury accounting for 1-4% of all traumatic SCIs (Bradley and Daroff's Neurology). The clinical picture is explained entirely by which spinal tracts cross and at what level:
TractDecussation siteEffect of unilateral lesion
Corticospinal (lateral)Medulla (decussates before entering cord)Ipsilateral motor loss BELOW lesion
Dorsal columns (fasciculus gracilis/cuneatus)Medulla (decussates before entering cord)Ipsilateral loss of proprioception, vibration, fine touch BELOW lesion
Lateral spinothalamicAnterior white commissure, 1-2 levels above entryContralateral loss of pain and temperature, 2-3 dermatomes BELOW lesion

Classic Triad

At the level of the lesion (ipsilateral):
  • Band of ipsilateral anesthesia (all modalities)
  • LMN signs at that level (flaccidity, loss of reflex at lesion level)
  • Ipsilateral Horner's syndrome if cervical cord is involved (interruption of descending sympathetic fibers)
Below the level of the lesion:
  • Ipsilateral: Spastic paresis/paralysis (UMN - corticospinal tract), loss of proprioception, vibration sense, and discriminative touch (dorsal columns); Babinski sign ipsilateral
  • Contralateral: Loss of pain and temperature sensation (spinothalamic tract), beginning 2-3 segments below the lesion

BSS-Plus (More Common in Practice)

Pure hemisection is rare. Most patients present with Brown-Séquard Plus syndrome (Taylor & Gleave, 1957): asymmetrical hemiplegia with hypoalgesia more prominent on the less paretic side - the clinical clue is the dissociation between the weaker side and the side with more sensory loss.

Etiology

CauseNotes
Penetrating trauma (most common)Stab wounds > gunshot wounds
Blunt traumaHyperextension, rotational injuries, locked facets, unilateral laminar/pedicle fractures
Disc herniationLateral disc herniations
TumorEpidural or intramedullary
Epidural abscess/hematoma
Multiple sclerosisDemyelinating plaque
Spinal cord infarction
Most frequently involves the cervical spine.

Prognosis - Best of All Cord Syndromes

BSS carries the best functional motor recovery of all incomplete spinal cord syndromes. Key prognostic points (Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics, 15th ed 2026):
  • Most recovery occurs in the first few months; improvement possible up to 2 years
  • Gait usually recovers within 6 months
  • Most patients regain bowel and bladder continence
  • Upper extremity predominant weakness = favorable ambulation outcome
  • If anatomic cord transection from penetrating trauma: significant recovery is unlikely
  • Only central cord syndrome and BSS are statistically associated with improved recovery at 2 years

Part 2: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES)

Anatomy & Definition

The cauda equina (Latin: "horse's tail") consists of the lumbar and sacral nerve roots within the thecal sac, distal to the conus medullaris (which ends at approximately L1-L2 in adults). CES is compression of these roots, making it a pure LMN injury - there is no spinal cord involvement (Bradley and Daroff's Neurology).
This anatomical distinction is critical: CES is not a spinal cord injury - it is a peripheral nerve root injury, explaining its LMN character and relatively better regenerative potential.

Classic Triad

  1. Bilateral lower extremity weakness and reduced sensation
  2. Saddle anesthesia (S3, S4, S5 roots) - numbness in the perineum, inner thighs, genitalia, buttocks
  3. Bowel/bladder dysfunction - urinary retention (most common early sign), urinary/fecal incontinence
The full triad is rarely present simultaneously. Early presentations often show only urinary hesitancy, groin numbness, and mild pain/weakness (Sabiston Textbook of Surgery).

Detailed Clinical Features

FeatureDetail
UrinaryRetention with overflow incontinence (parasympathetic S2-S4 disrupted); reduced detrusor tone; high post-void residual
BowelFecal incontinence or constipation; reduced anal sphincter tone
Saddle anesthesiaPerineum (S3-5), inner thighs
Lower limb weaknessBilateral but often asymmetric - variable level depending on roots compressed
ReflexesAbsent knee jerk (L3-4), ankle jerk (S1-2); absent bulbocavernosus reflex; absent anal wink
PainSevere low back pain ± bilateral sciatica; though some have no pain
Sexual dysfunctionErectile dysfunction, loss of genital sensation
Root-level localisation (Gray's Anatomy for Students):
  • L4 compression: reduced knee extension power, reduced knee jerk
  • L5 compression: reduced foot/toe dorsiflexion
  • S1-S2 compression: reduced ankle jerk
  • S3-S5 compression: perineal numbness, bladder/bowel dysfunction

Etiology

CauseFrequency
Lumbar disc herniation (most common)~45% of CES cases; 1-3% of acute disc ruptures cause CES
Lumbar spinal stenosisOlder patients
Trauma (burst fracture at L3 or below)Young patients
Tumour (primary or metastatic)
Epidural abscess/hematomaSurgical emergency
Iatrogenic (post-op haematoma, spinal anaesthesia)

Investigations

  1. Emergent MRI lumbar spine - imaging of choice; confirms compression and guides surgical planning
  2. CT myelogram - if MRI contraindicated
  3. Bladder ultrasound / catheterisation - measure post-void residual volume (>100 mL is significant)
  4. Digital rectal examination - assess anal sphincter tone - mandatory

Management - SURGICAL EMERGENCY

  • CES is a surgical emergency - obtain emergent MRI and spine surgery consultation simultaneously, not sequentially
  • Surgical decompression by laminectomy + removal of offending lesion
  • Timing: Within 48 hours of symptom onset (recommendation); given unclear symptom timelines in practice, emergent decompression within hours is typically pursued
  • Up to 85% of patients return to previous bowel/bladder and motor function within 1 year after decompression (Sabiston Surgery)
  • IV corticosteroids: determined by the treating spine surgeon on a case-by-case basis

Head-to-Head Comparison: BSS vs. CES

FeatureBrown-Séquard SyndromeCauda Equina Syndrome
LocationLateral half of spinal cord (hemisection)Nerve roots below conus (L1-L2 and below)
Type of injurySpinal cord (UMN + LMN at level)Peripheral nerve roots (pure LMN)
MotorIpsilateral spastic paresis below lesionBilateral (often asymmetric) flaccid weakness
ReflexesUMN: hyperreflexia below; LMN at levelAll lower limb reflexes absent; Babinski absent
Proprioception/vibrationIpsilateral loss below lesionLost in affected dermatomal distribution
Pain/temperatureContralateral loss, 2-3 levels belowLost in saddle distribution
Bladder/bowelUsually preserved (unless bilateral involvement)Classic feature - retention, incontinence
Saddle anesthesiaAbsentHallmark feature
SymmetryAsymmetric by definitionBilateral but may be asymmetric
Spine levelUsually cervicalL1-L2 and below
Common causePenetrating trauma, MSDisc herniation, stenosis, trauma
PrognosisBest of all cord syndromes; good ambulation recovery85% return to function with timely surgery
UrgencyUrgentSurgical emergency
ImagingMRI cervical/thoracic spineEmergent MRI lumbar spine

CES vs. Conus Medullaris Syndrome (Key Differentiator)

FeatureConus MedullarisCauda Equina
Motor neuron involvementBoth UMN and LMNLMN only
Motor symmetrySymmetricalAsymmetrical
Vertebral injury levelT12-L2Below L2
Deep tendon reflexesAbsentAbsent
Areflexic bladderYesYes
Bulbocavernosus reflexAbsentAbsent
(Table adapted from Bradley and Daroff's Neurology in Clinical Practice)

Sources: Bradley and Daroff's Neurology in Clinical Practice; Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics, 15th ed 2026; Sabiston Textbook of Surgery; Gray's Anatomy for Students; Rosen's Emergency Medicine
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.