This is a proforma of a case history for final MDS examination. Write a well structured case history for a patient named Tanashree , age 7 yrs, female, no significant medical history with a diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis wrt 85 . The patient has a past dental history of pulpectomy wrt 75. IOPAR have been taken for investigation.

Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

pulpitis AND primary teeth

Searching the Web

AAPD pulp therapy primary teeth guideline 2024 irreversible pulpitis

Browsing Directory

~/

Reading File
Running Command

python -c "import pdfplumber; p='/tmp/workspace/attachments/c83a2a20-570a-495e-84ef-3a08ce4c651c/CASE HISTORY- General.pdf'; pdf=pdfplumber.open(p); print('PAGES',len(pdf.pages)); [print('\\n--- PAGE',i+1,'---\\n'+(page.extract_text() or '')) for i,page in enumerate(pdf.pages)]"

CASE HISTORY

Demographic Profile

  • Date: [DD/MM/YYYY]
  • OPD No.: [ ]
  • Name: Tanashree
  • Nickname: [ ]
  • Age/Gender: 7 years/Female
  • Accompanying person: [Parent/guardian name and relationship]
  • Father’s name: [ ]
  • Mother’s name: [ ]
  • Occupation of father: [ ]
  • Occupation of mother: [ ]
  • Contact number: [ ]
  • Religion: [ ]

Chief Complaint

Pain in the lower right back tooth region since [duration].

History of Presenting Illness

Tanashree, a 7-year-old female child, reported with pain in the lower right posterior tooth region. The pain was [spontaneous/provoked], [sharp/dull/throbbing], and was aggravated by [hot/cold/sweet/chewing]. The pain persisted even after removal of the stimulus and was associated with [night pain/food lodgement/sleep disturbance, if present].
There was no history of swelling, pus discharge, fever, or facial asymmetry [modify if present]. No analgesic or antibiotic medication was taken for the present complaint [or specify if taken].

Past Medical History

  • No significant medical history.
  • No history of hospitalization, systemic illness, allergy, or long-term medication.
  • No relevant history of bleeding disorders, asthma, epilepsy, diabetes, cardiac disease, or infectious disease.

Past Family History

  • Non-contributory.
  • No relevant familial history of systemic illness or dental anomalies reported.

Past Dental History

  • History of pulpectomy with respect to 75.
  • Details regarding date of treatment, restoration provided, and follow-up status: [to be recorded].
  • No other relevant past dental treatment reported.

Prenatal, Natal and Postnatal History

Prenatal History

  • Illness during pregnancy: Not contributory/No relevant history.
  • Drug therapy during pregnancy: Not contributory.
  • Antibiotic intake during pregnancy: Not contributory.
  • Blood incompatibility: Absent.
  • Fluoride tablet intake during pregnancy: [ask and record].

Natal History

  • Type of delivery: [Normal vaginal delivery/Caesarean section]
  • Birth cry: [Immediate/Delayed]
  • Prematurity: [Absent/Present]
  • Congenital anomaly: Absent.
  • Neonatal jaundice: [Absent/Present]
  • Blood transfusion: [Absent/Present]
  • Natal/neonatal teeth: Absent.

Feeding History

  • Breastfeeding: [Duration]
  • Bottle feeding: [Present/Absent; duration and contents]
  • Weaning: [Age and type of food]
  • Vitamin/iron supplementation: [Present/Absent]

Postnatal and Infancy History

  • Developmental milestones: Reportedly normal for age.
  • Immunization status: Reportedly complete for age.
  • Childhood diseases: No significant history.
  • Medication history: Non-contributory.

Personal History

Oral Hygiene Practices

  • Method: [Manual toothbrush]
  • Material used: [Fluoridated/non-fluoridated toothpaste]
  • Frequency: [Once/twice daily]
  • Other oral hygiene aids: [None/Specify]
  • Frequency of toothbrush replacement: [Every 3 months/Specify]
  • Brushing supervision by parent: [Present/Absent]

Oral Habits

No deleterious oral habits reported, such as thumb sucking, tongue thrusting, nail biting, mouth breathing, or bruxism.

Fluoride History

  • Source of drinking water: [Municipal/borewell/filtered water]
  • Fluoride tablet exposure: [Absent/Present]
  • Ingestion of toothpaste: [Absent/Present]
  • Excess use of fluoridated toothpaste: [Absent/Present]

Diet Assessment

24-Hour Diet History

TimeFood consumedQuantityMethod of preparationAdded sugar
Breakfast[ ][ ][ ][ ]
Mid-morning snack[ ][ ][ ][ ]
Lunch[ ][ ][ ][ ]
Evening snack[ ][ ][ ][ ]
Dinner[ ][ ][ ][ ]
Bedtime snack/drink[ ][ ][ ][ ]
Dietary assessment: To assess frequency of fermentable carbohydrate intake and between-meal sugary snacks.

General Examination

  • Gait: Normal
  • Body type: [ ]
  • Posture: Normal
  • Built: [Well built/moderately built]
  • Height: [ ] cm
  • Weight: [ ] kg
  • Pulse rate: [ ] beats/min
  • Respiratory rate: [ ] breaths/min
  • Pallor: Absent
  • Icterus: Absent
  • Cyanosis: Absent
  • Clubbing: Absent
  • Lymphadenopathy: Absent
  • Edema: Absent

Frankl Behaviour Rating Scale

[Rating 3: Positive] - The child accepts treatment, shows cautious but cooperative behaviour, and follows the dentist’s directions.

Extraoral Examination

  • Head shape: Normocephalic
  • Facial form: [Mesoprosopic/Euryprosopic/Leptoprosopic]
  • Facial symmetry: Symmetrical
  • Facial divergence: [Straight/Anterior/Posterior]
  • Profile: [Straight/Convex/Concave]
  • Eyes, nose and ears: No abnormality detected
  • Hair and nails: Normal
  • Lips: Competent, no abnormality detected
  • Lymph nodes: Non-palpable and non-tender
  • Temporomandibular joint: No clicking, tenderness, or restriction of movement
  • Neck: No abnormality detected

Intraoral Examination

Soft-Tissue Examination

  • Lips: Normal
  • Buccal mucosa: Normal
  • Tongue: Normal in size, shape, and mobility
  • Floor of mouth: Normal
  • Palate: Normal
  • Frenum: Normal
  • Tonsils: Normal
  • Salivary gland openings: Normal

Gingiva

  • Colour: Coral pink
  • Contour: Scalloped
  • Consistency: Firm
  • Texture: Stippled
  • Bleeding on probing: [Absent/Present]

Hard-Tissue Examination

  • Dentition: Mixed dentition appropriate for chronological age.
  • Teeth present: Record in FDI notation after clinical examination.
  • 85: Deep carious lesion involving dentin, with clinical features consistent with pulpal involvement.
  • 75: Previously treated by pulpectomy. Restoration status to be evaluated clinically and radiographically.
  • Other carious teeth: [Record after examination]
  • Root stumps: [Absent/Present]
  • Tenderness on percussion in relation to 85: [Absent/Present]
  • Mobility in relation to 85: [Absent/Present]
  • Sinus tract/swelling: Absent clinically [modify if present].
  • Developmental anomalies/fluorosis/fracture/attrition: [Absent/Present]

Occlusal Assessment

  • Molar relationship: [Flush terminal plane/mesial step/distal step]
  • Primate spaces: [Present/Absent]
  • Crowding: [Absent/Present]
  • Overjet: [ ] mm
  • Overbite: [ ] mm
  • Midline: [Coincident/Deviated]
  • Arch length: [Adequate/Inadequate] in maxillary and mandibular arches.

Caries and Oral Hygiene Indices

  • dmft/def score: [ ]
  • DMFT score: [ ]
  • Debris Index: [ ]
  • Calculus Index: [ ]
  • OHI-S score: [ ]
  • Gingival Index: [ ]
Inference: To be recorded after completion of clinical examination and index scoring.

Examination of Area of Chief Complaint

Tooth 85

  • Deep carious lesion present in relation to 85.
  • History suggestive of spontaneous and/or lingering pain.
  • Pulp vitality tests in primary teeth may have limited reliability and should be correlated with symptoms, clinical findings, and radiographic findings.
  • Percussion tenderness, mobility, periodontal probing, swelling, sinus tract, and furcal tenderness should be specifically assessed and recorded.

Provisional Diagnosis

Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with respect to 85.

Differential Diagnosis

  1. Symptomatic reversible pulpitis with respect to 85.
  2. Pulp necrosis with respect to 85.
  3. Symptomatic apical periodontitis secondary to pulpal inflammation in 85.

Investigations

  1. Intraoral periapical radiograph (IOPAR) with respect to 85.
  2. IOPAR evaluation of previously pulpectomized 75, if clinically indicated.
  3. Clinical assessment of:
    • Extent of caries and restorability
    • Furcation or periapical radiolucency
    • Periodontal ligament space widening
    • Root resorption
    • Status of developing successor, 45
    • Remaining root length of 85
  4. Pulp sensibility tests may be attempted but interpreted cautiously in primary teeth.

IOPAR Findings

IOPAR has been taken. Record the following findings after interpretation:
  • Extent of caries in 85: [ ]
  • Pulpal involvement: [ ]
  • Furcal/periapical radiolucency: [Present/Absent]
  • Periodontal ligament widening: [Present/Absent]
  • Root resorption in 85: [Physiological/Pathological/Absent]
  • Status of follicle/developing successor 45: [ ]
  • Radiographic status of pulpectomized 75: [ ]

Final Diagnosis

Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with respect to 85.

Treatment Plan

Emergency Phase

  • Relief of pain.
  • Removal of gross caries and placement of a temporary restoration, if required.
  • Analgesic prescription only when clinically indicated.
  • Antibiotics are not indicated for uncomplicated pulpitis without systemic involvement, spreading infection, or cellulitis.

Medical Phase

  • No medical intervention required, as the child has no significant medical history.

Preventive Phase

  • Oral hygiene instructions to child and parent.
  • Dietary counselling to reduce frequency of sugary snacks and drinks.
  • Age-appropriate supervised toothbrushing twice daily using fluoridated toothpaste.
  • Topical fluoride application, if indicated according to caries risk.
  • Recall and caries-risk assessment.

Preparatory Phase

  • Behaviour management using tell-show-do, positive reinforcement, distraction, and parental communication.
  • Oral prophylaxis.
  • Caries control and restoration of other teeth as indicated.

Corrective Phase

Endodontic Treatment

  • Pulpectomy with respect to 85, provided the tooth is restorable, has adequate remaining root length, and there is no contraindicating pathological root resorption or extensive infection.
  • Obturation with a resorbable root canal filling material appropriate for primary teeth.
  • Definitive full-coronal restoration with a stainless steel crown after pulpectomy.

Alternative Plan

  • If 85 is non-restorable, shows excessive pathological root resorption, or has an unfavourable prognosis:
    • Extraction of 85.
    • Space analysis and consideration of an appropriate space maintainer, based on eruption status of 46 and assessment of the arch.

Maintenance Phase

  • Clinical and radiographic follow-up at appropriate intervals.
  • Evaluation of the treated 85 for pain, swelling, mobility, restoration integrity, and pathological radiographic changes.
  • Monitoring of exfoliation of 85 and eruption of its successor, 45.
  • Follow-up of the previously pulpectomized 75.

Treatment Done

VisitDateTreatment done
1[ ]Case history, clinical examination, IOPAR taken, provisional diagnosis and treatment planning
2[ ]Behaviour management, caries excavation/access opening or pulpectomy initiation in 85, as indicated
3[ ]Completion of pulpectomy and obturation in 85
4[ ]Stainless steel crown placement with respect to 85
Recall[ ]Clinical and radiographic review
For the final presentation, do not state specific radiographic findings until the IOPAR is interpreted. The proposed pulpectomy-plus-stainless-steel-crown plan should be confirmed from restorability, root resorption, furcal status, and the radiographic relationship to the developing 45. The AAPD primary-tooth guidance supports basing diagnosis on symptoms together with clinical and radiographic findings in irreversibly inflamed primary teeth.

if i want to present an acute case. how should i write in the hopi?

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

pulpitis AND primary teeth

Searching the Web

AAPD primary teeth irreversible pulpitis symptoms spontaneous lingering pain guideline

For an acute presentation of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with respect to 85, write the HOPI as a short chronological pain history:
History of Presenting Illness:
The patient was apparently asymptomatic until [duration, e.g., 2 days] ago, when she developed pain in the lower right back tooth region. The pain was sudden in onset, spontaneous, sharp/throbbing, and severe in intensity. It was intermittent initially but has become more frequent and persistent.
Pain was aggravated by intake of cold, hot, and sweet food पदार्थs and persisted for several minutes even after removal of the stimulus. It was also aggravated on lying down and disturbed the child’s sleep at night. The pain was non-radiating/radiating to [specify only if reported].
There was no history of swelling, pus discharge, trauma, fever, or difficulty in mouth opening. The parent gave [name/dose if known] analgesic medication, which provided temporary relief. The patient then reported to the department for treatment.

Short exam-style version

A 7-year-old female child reported with acute, severe, spontaneous, throbbing pain in the lower right posterior region since 2 days. Pain was aggravated by hot, cold, and sweet stimuli and lingered after removal of the stimulus. It was worse at night and on lying down, causing sleep disturbance. Analgesics provided only temporary relief. There was no associated swelling, pus discharge, fever, or history of trauma.
Only include features actually elicited from the parent or child. Do not write “acute” merely because pain started recently. The description should support the diagnosis through spontaneous, lingering, severe or nocturnal pain, as described in the AAPD primary-tooth guideline.

what duration should I write?

For an acute case, write 2 to 3 days.
A suitable HOPI line:
The patient was apparently asymptomatic until 2 days ago, when she developed sudden-onset pain in the lower right posterior region.
For a more severe acute presentation with nocturnal pain, you can write 3 days:
The pain started 3 days ago, was spontaneous and throbbing in nature, increased in intensity, and disturbed sleep.
Avoid writing a very long duration such as weeks or months if you are presenting it as an acute painful case.

fabricate a diet history for a 7 yrs old child

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

diet AND dental caries AND children

Searching the Web

AAPD policy dietary recommendations children dental caries sugar snacks

24-Hour Diet History

TimeType of foodQuantityMethod of preparationSugar added
7:30 amMilk with Bournvita1 glassBoiled milk with BournvitaYes, 2 teaspoons
8:30 amBread with jam2 slicesToasted bread with jamYes
11:00 amCream biscuit3 biscuitsPackagedYes
1:30 pmRice, dal, vegetable curry and curd1 small plateHome cookedNo
4:30 pmChocolate/candy1 small bar or 2 candiesPackagedYes
5:00 pmTea with biscuits½ cup tea and 2 biscuitsTea prepared with milk and sugarYes
8:30 pmChapati, dal and vegetable curry2 chapatis with 1 bowl dalHome cookedNo
9:30 pmSweetened milk before bed1 glassBoiled milk with sugarYes, 1 teaspoon

Dental Note

  • The child consumes sugar-containing snacks between meals, especially biscuits, chocolates, and sweetened beverages.
  • Frequency of sugar exposure: approximately 5 to 6 times/day.
  • Bedtime intake of sweetened milk is present.
  • The diet is cariogenic, with frequent exposure to fermentable carbohydrates and added sugars.
You can write the inference as:
Inference: The 24-hour diet history reveals frequent consumption of refined carbohydrates and sugar-containing food items between meals, including bedtime sweetened milk. Hence, the child has a cariogenic dietary pattern and is at increased risk for dental caries.

normal pulse rate, breathing rate of 7 yr old

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

pediatric vital signs reference ranges

Searching the Web

normal vital signs school age 6 12 years pulse respiratory rate reference

For a healthy, resting 7-year-old child:
  • Pulse rate: 75-115 beats/minute
  • Respiratory rate: 18-30 breaths/minute
For the case sheet, you may write a plausible normal recorded value:
Pulse rate: 90 beats/minute, regular
Respiratory rate: 22 breaths/minute, normal
Record these only if measured while the child is calm and not crying, anxious, febrile, or immediately active.

Create a one-page case presentation PDF permanent molars. give fdi notation

give fdi notation- permanent teeth - lower central incisors, 4 molars, others deciduous

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

tooth eruption permanent molars incisors

Searching the Web

FDI notation permanent first molars mandibular central incisors

Dentition status: Mixed dentition
Permanent teeth present:
  • Mandibular central incisors: 31, 41
  • First permanent molars: 16, 26, 36, 46
All other teeth are deciduous:
55, 54, 53, 52, 51 | 61, 62, 63, 64, 65
85, 84, 83, 82, 81 | 71, 72, 73, 74, 75
You can enter it in the case presentation as:
Dentition: Mixed dentition. Permanent teeth erupted were 16, 26, 31, 41, 36 and 46. The remaining teeth present were deciduous.

give DMFT, DMFS, deft/defs score- 85 carious, 75- filled

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

DMFT dmfs indices primary teeth

Searching the Web

WHO dmft dmfs index decayed filled teeth surfaces definitions primary dentition

Based on the information given:
IndexScoreBreakdown
DMFT for permanent teeth0D = 0, M = 0, F = 0
DMFS for permanent teeth0DS = 0, MS = 0, FS = 0
deft for deciduous teeth2d = 1 (85), e = 0, f = 1 (75)
defs for deciduous teeth2*ds = 1, es = 0, fs = 1*
*This assumes that 85 has caries on one surface and 75 has a restoration involving one surface. In the actual case record, calculate defs from the real number of affected/restored surfaces. For example, if 85 has two carious surfaces and 75 has a two-surface restoration, then defs = 4.
Case-sheet entry:
DMFT/DMFS: 0/0
deft/defs: 2/2
(d = 1 in 85; f = 1 in 75)

calculate OHIS index- pts oral hygiene is good

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

simplified oral hygiene index scoring

Searching the Web

Simplified Oral Hygiene Index OHI-S good 0.0 1.2 debris calculus scoring

For case presentation, document:
Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S): 0.5 - Good oral hygiene
DI-S: 0.5
CI-S: 0.0
[ \text{OHI-S} = \text{DI-S} + \text{CI-S} = 0.5 + 0 = 0.5 ]
Interpretation: Good oral hygiene. OHI-S scores from 0.0 to 1.2 are classified as good.
Use this only if your clinical examination supports minimal soft debris and no calculus.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.