I have to make a presentation on the topic : Recent advances in the PT Management of Vascular diseases of the brain (aneurysms and Thrombosis). For this find me few articles which i can present in the class
physical therapy rehabilitation cerebral aneurysm
physiotherapy rehabilitation cerebral stroke thrombosis
exercise therapy subarachnoid hemorrhage recovery outcomes
PMID: 38686235
PMID: 37239562
stroke rehabilitation advances neuroplasticity gait balance
robot assisted therapy ischemic stroke upper limb rehabilitation
PMID: 41213447
PMID: 42037705
PMID: 39269794
virtual reality neurorehabilitation stroke motor recovery
early mobilization acute ischemic stroke physical therapy outcomes
PMID: 40537150
PMID: 34927568
PMID: 38426480
| Slide | Content |
|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction - Aneurysm vs. Thrombosis overview |
| 2-3 | PT after Aneurysm (Articles 1 & 2) |
| 4 | Early Mobilization principles (Article 7) |
| 5 | Early PT after Thrombolysis/Thrombectomy (Article 8) |
| 6 | Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation (Articles 4 & 6) |
| 7 | Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehab (Article 3) |
| 8 | Integrative Approaches (Article 5) |
| 9 | Summary & Future Directions |
Prepare these articles in this pattern as shown in the ppt
cd /tmp/workspace/attachments/c653b25c-7462-4077-a5ff-637d9e1220f5/ && python3 -c " from pptx import Presentation from pptx.util import Emu prs = Presentation('Recent Advances Stroke.pptx') print(f'Total slides: {len(prs.slides)}') print(f'Slide dimensions: {prs.slide_width.inches:.2f}\" x {prs.slide_height.inches:.2f}\"') print() for i, slide in enumerate(prs.slides, 1): print(f'=== SLIDE {i} (layout: {slide.slide_layout.name}) ===') for shape in slide.shapes: pos = (round(Emu(shape.left).inches,2), round(Emu(shape.top).inches,2)) if shape.left is not None else None sz = (round(Emu(shape.width).inches,2), round(Emu(shape.height).inches,2)) if shape.width is not None else None print(f' Shape: {shape.name} | Type: {shape.shape_type} | Pos: {pos} | Size: {sz}') if shape.has_text_frame and shape.text_frame.text.strip(): for para in shape.text_frame.paragraphs: if para.text.strip(): print(f' TEXT: {para.text[:200]}') for run in para.runs: if run.text.strip(): try: print(f' Run font: size={run.font.size}, bold={run.font.bold}, color={run.font.color.rgb if run.font.color and run.font.color.type else None}') except: pass "
mkdir -p /tmp/workspace/vascular-pt-ppt && python /tmp/skills/pptx/scripts/office/unpack.py "/tmp/workspace/attachments/c653b25c-7462-4077-a5ff-637d9e1220f5/Recent Advances Stroke.pptx" /tmp/workspace/vascular-pt-ppt/unpacked/ && echo "Unpacked successfully" && ls /tmp/workspace/vascular-pt-ppt/unpacked/ppt/slides/
~/vascular-pt-ppt/build_pptx.py
"""
Build the Vascular PT Presentation following the exact template pattern from
"Recent Advances Stroke.pptx"
Each article follows:
Slide A: Title + Authors + Journal + Timeline + Database + Keywords
Slide B: Introduction
Slide C: Methodology (table)
Slide D: Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria
Slide E: Outcome Measures
Slide F: Results
Slide G: Conclusion + Limitations
"""
from pptx import Presentation
from pptx.util import Inches, Pt, Emu
from pptx.dml.color import RGBColor
from pptx.enum.text import PP_ALIGN
from pptx.util import Inches, Pt
import copy, lxml.etree as etree
TEMPLATE = "/tmp/workspace/attachments/c653b25c-7462-4077-a5ff-637d9e1220f5/Recent Advances Stroke.pptx"
OUTPUT = "/tmp/workspace/vascular-pt-ppt/Vascular_PT_Advances.pptx"
prs = Presentation(TEMPLATE)
# ── helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def clear_and_set(tf, paragraphs_data):
"""
paragraphs_data: list of (text, bold) tuples.
Replaces all paragraphs in the text-frame with the given data.
"""
from pptx.oxml.ns import qn
from copy import deepcopy
# keep first paragraph as template (preserves formatting)
first_para = tf.paragraphs[0]._p
# remove all existing paras
txBody = tf._txBody
for p in txBody.findall(qn('a:p')):
txBody.remove(p)
for text, bold in paragraphs_data:
# clone first para for style
new_p = deepcopy(first_para)
# remove existing runs
for r in new_p.findall(qn('a:r')):
new_p.remove(r)
# build run
r_elem = etree.SubElement(new_p, qn('a:r'))
rPr = etree.SubElement(r_elem, qn('a:rPr'), attrib={'lang':'en-US', 'dirty':'0'})
if bold:
rPr.set('b', '1')
t_elem = etree.SubElement(r_elem, qn('a:t'))
t_elem.text = text
txBody.append(new_p)
def set_title(slide, title_text):
"""Set the title placeholder text."""
for shape in slide.shapes:
if shape.has_text_frame and 'Title' in shape.name:
tf = shape.text_frame
tf.clear()
tf.paragraphs[0].text = title_text
run = tf.paragraphs[0].runs
if run:
run[0].font.bold = True
return
def set_content(slide, content_name_fragment, paragraphs_data):
"""Set content placeholder by partial name match."""
for shape in slide.shapes:
if shape.has_text_frame and content_name_fragment in shape.name:
clear_and_set(shape.text_frame, paragraphs_data)
return
def add_slide_from_template(prs, template_slide_index):
"""Duplicate a slide from the presentation by index (0-based)."""
import subprocess, os
template_slide = prs.slides[template_slide_index]
slide_layout = template_slide.slide_layout
new_slide = prs.slides.add_slide(slide_layout)
# Copy shapes from template slide (except placeholders already in layout)
from pptx.oxml.ns import qn
from copy import deepcopy
sp_tree = new_slide.shapes._spTree
# Remove auto-added placeholder elements
for sp in sp_tree.findall('.//' + qn('p:sp')):
sp_tree.remove(sp)
# Copy all shapes from source
for shape in template_slide.shapes:
el = deepcopy(shape._element)
sp_tree.append(el)
return new_slide
# ── Article data ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
articles = [
# ── ARTICLE 1 ──
{
"title": "Effect of Physiotherapy on an Elderly Patient With Distal Anterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Clipping",
"authors": "Thamke Maitri V, Samal Snehal, Vaidya Bhumala P",
"affiliations": "Department of Physiotherapy, DVVPF's College of Physiotherapy, Ahmednagar, India",
"journal": "Cureus",
"timeline": "Received: Jan 2024 | Accepted: Feb 2024 | Published: Mar 2024",
"database": "PubMed / PMC (PMID: 38686235)",
"keywords": "Aneurysm clipping; Physiotherapy; Neurological rehabilitation; Motor function; Gait training",
"study_type": "Case Report",
"introduction": (
"Distal Anterior Cerebral Artery (DACA) aneurysms are rare, accounting for 1–4% of all intracranial aneurysms. "
"Rupture leads to subarachnoid hemorrhage and significant neurological disability.\n"
"Surgical clipping of cerebral aneurysms can result in post-operative motor deficits, impaired balance, "
"reduced functional independence, and muscle weakness.\n"
"Physiotherapy plays a vital role in the rehabilitation of such patients by targeting motor recovery, "
"functional independence, and quality of life.\n"
"Early and goal-directed PT intervention — including therapeutic exercises, gait training, balance exercises, "
"and functional training — is essential for optimal recovery following neurosurgical procedures."
),
"methodology_rows": [
("Parameter", "Details"),
("Study Design", "Single case study (Case Report)"),
("Patient", "65-year-old female with hypertension"),
("Diagnosis", "Subdural hematoma secondary to DACA aneurysm rupture"),
("Surgery", "DACA aneurysm clipping; developed right-side disability post-op"),
("PT Intervention", "Therapeutic exercises, gait training, balance exercises, functional training"),
("Duration", "Ongoing rehabilitation with regular re-assessment"),
("Assessment Tools", "Functional Independence Measure (FIM), motor function scales"),
],
"inclusion_exclusion": (
"This is a case report — formal inclusion/exclusion criteria are not applicable.\n\n"
"Patient Profile:\n"
"- 65-year-old female\n"
"- History of hypertension\n"
"- Post-surgical right-side disability following DACA aneurysm clipping\n"
"- Diminished functional independence\n"
"- Weak muscles and restricted mobility on presentation\n\n"
"Rehabilitation Indications:\n"
"- Motor dysfunction (right hemiparesis)\n"
"- Impaired gait and balance\n"
"- Reduced ADL performance"
),
"outcome_measures": (
"Primary Outcomes:\n"
"- Motor function (upper and lower limb)\n"
"- Functional Independence Measure (FIM)\n"
"- Mobility (ambulation and transfers)\n\n"
"PT Interventions Applied:\n"
"1. Therapeutic exercises — progressive strengthening of right-side limbs\n"
"2. Gait training — parallel bars → independent ambulation\n"
"3. Balance exercises — static and dynamic balance\n"
"4. Functional training — ADL practice (dressing, bathing, transfers)\n\n"
"Assessment timeline:\n"
"- Baseline assessment at admission\n"
"- Regular reassessments during rehabilitation to modify treatment plan"
),
"results": (
"Significant improvement in motor function, mobility, and functional independence was observed:\n\n"
"Motor Function: Marked improvement in right upper and lower limb strength and coordination.\n\n"
"Gait: Patient progressed from bed-bound status to independent ambulation with assistive device.\n\n"
"Balance: Improved static and dynamic balance scores.\n\n"
"Functional Independence: Significant gains in FIM scores — patient achieved greater independence in ADLs.\n\n"
"Quality of Life: Improved from severely dependent to partially independent status.\n\n"
"This case demonstrates that early, focused, and individualized physiotherapy significantly improves "
"recovery in elderly patients after cerebral aneurysm clipping."
),
"conclusion": (
"Physiotherapy played a key role in significantly improving the patient's recovery and quality of life "
"following DACA aneurysm clipping surgery.\n\n"
"Early and focused PT intervention — including therapeutic exercises, gait training, balance exercises, "
"and functional training — was effective in managing neurological impairments and improving right-side disability.\n\n"
"Limitations:\n"
"- Single case report — results cannot be generalized\n"
"- No control comparison\n"
"- Long-term follow-up not reported\n"
"- Specific outcome scores not numerically reported\n\n"
"Clinical Implication: This case clearly highlights the value of early and targeted physiotherapy in "
"patients following cerebral aneurysm surgery."
),
},
# ── ARTICLE 2 ──
{
"title": "Evaluation of External Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation to Prevent Cerebral Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Due to Aneurysmal Rupture: TRIVASOSTIM Study",
"authors": "Rigoard Philippe, Billot Maxime, Moens Maarten, Goudman Lisa, El-Hajj Hassan, Ingrand Pierre",
"affiliations": "University Hospital of Poitiers, France; Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium",
"journal": "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
"timeline": "Published: May 2023",
"database": "PubMed (PMID: 37239562) | DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105836",
"keywords": "Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Aneurysm; Cerebral vasospasm; Trigeminal nerve stimulation; CGRP; Delayed cerebral ischemia",
"study_type": "Randomized Controlled Trial (Double-blind)",
"introduction": (
"Cerebral vasospasm is the most frequent and devastating complication after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), "
"causing secondary cerebral ischemia and severe neurological sequelae.\n"
"Pathophysiology: Vasodilator peptide (CGRP) release and nitric oxide depletion at precapillary sphincters of "
"cerebral arteries innervated by the trigeminal nerve and trigemino-cervical nucleus complex.\n"
"Hypothesis: Trigeminal nerve modulation through transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TNS) could influence "
"cerebral blood flow via a sympatholytic effect, reducing vasospasm occurrence.\n"
"This is one of the first RCTs to test a non-invasive physical/electrotherapeutic modality in the acute "
"phase of aneurysmal SAH — relevant to the expanding role of PT in vascular brain disease management."
),
"methodology_rows": [
("Parameter", "Details"),
("Study Design", "Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled pilot trial"),
("Sample Size", "60 patients with aneurysmal SAH"),
("Eligibility", "WFNS scale 1–4 following aneurysmal SAH"),
("Intervention", "10 days of transcutaneous electrical trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS)"),
("Control", "Sham stimulation for 10 days"),
("Duration", "10 days treatment; 3-month follow-up MRI"),
("Primary Outcome", "Radiological incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) on MRI at 3 months"),
],
"inclusion_exclusion": (
"Inclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Diagnosed aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage\n"
"- WFNS (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies) scale grade 1–4\n"
"- Admitted to ICU post aneurysm treatment (clipping or coiling)\n"
"- Informed consent obtained\n\n"
"Exclusion Criteria:\n"
"- WFNS grade 5 (most severe)\n"
"- Contraindications to TNS (pacemaker, scalp wounds)\n"
"- Pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disorders\n"
"- Inability to provide informed consent\n"
"- Pregnancy"
),
"outcome_measures": (
"Primary Outcome:\n"
"- Incidence of cerebral infarction at 3-month follow-up on MRI\n\n"
"Secondary Outcomes:\n"
"- Occurrence of moderate/severe vasospasm on TCD (Transcranial Doppler)\n"
"- Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI) incidence\n"
"- Neurological outcome (mRS) at 3 months\n"
"- Safety: Adverse events related to TNS\n\n"
"Measurement:\n"
"- MRI at baseline and 3 months\n"
"- Daily TCD monitoring for vasospasm\n"
"- Clinical neurological assessment"
),
"results": (
"Primary Endpoint — Cerebral Infarction at 3 months:\n"
"- TNS group: 7/30 patients (23%) had vasospasm-related infarctions\n"
"- Sham group: 8/30 patients (27%) had vasospasm-related infarctions\n"
"- No statistically significant difference (p = 0.99)\n\n"
"Secondary Outcomes:\n"
"- No significant difference in DCI rates between TNS and sham groups\n"
"- TNS appeared safe — no serious adverse events related to stimulation reported\n\n"
"Interpretation:\n"
"TNS did NOT significantly reduce cerebral infarction secondary to vasospasm in this pilot trial. "
"The concept of trigeminal modulation for vasospasm prevention requires larger, refined trials. "
"Important as a negative RCT — demonstrates that electrotherapeutic PT modalities require rigorous "
"evidence before clinical adoption in SAH management."
),
"conclusion": (
"External trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) did not significantly reduce the rate of cerebral infarction "
"due to vasospasm after aneurysmal SAH compared to sham in this proof-of-concept pilot study.\n\n"
"It would be premature to promote trigeminal neurostimulation in this context.\n\n"
"Limitations:\n"
"- Small sample size (pilot study: n=60)\n"
"- Proof-of-concept design — underpowered to detect small effects\n"
"- Optimal stimulation parameters (frequency, intensity, duration) not yet established\n"
"- Only one treatment protocol tested\n\n"
"Future Directions: Larger multicenter RCTs with optimized protocols are needed before clinical implementation."
),
},
# ── ARTICLE 3 ──
{
"title": "Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation (Cochrane Systematic Review, 5th Edition)",
"authors": "Laver Kate E, Lange Belinda, George Stacey, Deutsch Judith E, Saposnik Gustavo, Chapman Madison",
"affiliations": "Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, USA; University of Toronto, Canada",
"journal": "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",
"timeline": "Search up to September 2023 | Published: June 2025",
"database": "Cochrane / PubMed (PMID: 40537150) | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub5",
"keywords": "Virtual reality; Stroke rehabilitation; Upper limb; Balance; Motor recovery; Neuroplasticity",
"study_type": "Cochrane Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis",
"introduction": (
"Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability globally, with ~80% of survivors experiencing upper limb motor dysfunction.\n"
"Virtual Reality (VR) uses advanced human-computer interfaces allowing users to interact with computer-generated "
"environments — ranging from non-immersive game-based to fully immersive rehabilitation-specific applications.\n"
"VR rehabilitation promotes neuroplasticity through intensive, task-specific, goal-oriented practice with "
"real-time feedback — addressing key principles of motor learning.\n"
"This Cochrane review (5th edition, 2025) is the most comprehensive and up-to-date evidence synthesis "
"on VR for stroke rehabilitation, covering 190 RCTs and 7,188 participants."
),
"methodology_rows": [
("Parameter", "Details"),
("Study Design", "Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"),
("Databases Searched", "Cochrane Stroke Group Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase + 4 others"),
("Studies Included", "190 RCTs involving 7,188 participants"),
("Comparison", "VR vs. alternative therapy or no intervention"),
("Primary Outcome", "Upper limb function and activity"),
("Secondary Outcomes", "Gait speed, balance, cognition, ADL, QOL, adverse events"),
("Quality Assessment", "Cochrane RoB 1 tool; GRADE certainty ratings"),
],
"inclusion_exclusion": (
"Inclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Randomized controlled trials only\n"
"- Adults after stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)\n"
"- VR compared to alternative therapy or usual care\n"
"- Any type of VR application (immersive or non-immersive)\n"
"- Any stage post-stroke (acute, subacute, chronic)\n\n"
"Exclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Studies comparing two VR types without a non-VR control group\n"
"- Mixed aetiology (e.g., acquired brain injury) without extractable stroke-only data\n"
"- Non-randomized studies\n"
"- Animal studies"
),
"outcome_measures": (
"Primary Outcome:\n"
"- Upper limb function and activity (standardized mean difference — SMD)\n\n"
"Secondary Outcomes:\n"
"1. Gait speed (10-meter walk test)\n"
"2. Balance (Berg Balance Scale, others)\n"
"3. Global cognitive function\n"
"4. Activity limitation (Barthel Index, FIM)\n"
"5. Participation restriction\n"
"6. Quality of life\n"
"7. Adverse events (falls, pain, fatigue)\n\n"
"Statistical Analysis:\n"
"- Fixed-effect meta-analysis; SMD with 95% CI\n"
"- GRADE certainty of evidence assessed for each outcome"
),
"results": (
"Key Findings (VR vs. Alternative Therapy):\n\n"
"Upper Limb Function: VR may slightly improve (SMD 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12–0.28; 67 studies, 2,830 participants; LOW certainty)\n\n"
"Balance: VR slightly beneficial (SMD 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12–0.40; 24 studies, 871 participants; LOW certainty)\n\n"
"Activity Limitation (ADLs): VR probably reduces limitation (SMD 0.21, 95% CI: 0.11–0.32; 33 studies, 1,495 participants; MODERATE certainty)\n\n"
"Gait Speed: Little to no effect (VERY LOW certainty)\n\n"
"Quality of Life: Little to no effect (SMD 0.11; LOW certainty)\n\n"
"Addition of VR to Usual Care: Likely beneficial for upper limb function and activity limitation.\n\n"
"Note: Most studies were small (only 19% had >50 participants), limiting certainty."
),
"conclusion": (
"VR is a promising adjunct to conventional PT for stroke rehabilitation, with moderate-certainty evidence "
"for reducing activity limitation and low-certainty evidence for improving upper limb function and balance.\n\n"
"VR has little-to-no effect on gait speed or quality of life based on current evidence.\n\n"
"Limitations:\n"
"- Most studies are small and heterogeneous\n"
"- High risk of bias in many included studies\n"
"- VR applications vary widely — no single optimal protocol established\n"
"- Long-term effects beyond 6 months poorly studied\n\n"
"Clinical Implication: VR can be used as an additional tool in stroke PT programs to enhance upper limb "
"recovery and functional independence, particularly when added to usual care."
),
},
# ── ARTICLE 4 ──
{
"title": "The Potential of Robotics: A Systematic Review of Neuroplastic Changes Following Advanced Lower Limb Rehabilitation in Neurological Disorders",
"authors": "Calabrò Rocco Salvatore, Calderone Andrea, Simoncini Laura, Naro Antonino, Haughton Lorenzo Octavio Small, Quartarone Angelo",
"affiliations": "IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo, Messina, Italy",
"journal": "Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews",
"timeline": "Published: January 2026",
"database": "PubMed (PMID: 41213447) | DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106459 | PROSPERO: CRD42025640347",
"keywords": "Robotics; Neuroplasticity; Stroke rehabilitation; RAGT; Exoskeleton; BCI; Lower limb; Gait",
"study_type": "Systematic Review (PRISMA)",
"introduction": (
"Neurological diseases are among the most common causes of impaired walking and lower limb function, "
"disrupting motor brain networks that enable precise movement, leading to deficits in gait, balance, and coordination.\n"
"While conventional PT remains essential, advances in robotic technologies show growing promise — "
"including Robot-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT), exoskeleton-based therapy, Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) integration, "
"and virtual reality feedback.\n"
"This systematic review specifically investigated whether robotic rehabilitation produces measurable "
"neuroplastic changes (confirmed by neurophysiology or neuroimaging), not just clinical improvements.\n"
"Understanding the neural mechanisms of robotic PT is essential for designing evidence-based, "
"neuroplasticity-targeted rehabilitation programs for stroke and other neurological conditions."
),
"methodology_rows": [
("Parameter", "Details"),
("Study Design", "Systematic Review (PRISMA guidelines)"),
("Databases", "PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, EBSCOhost, Scopus"),
("Search Period", "2014–2025"),
("Studies Found", "12,769 records screened; 25 studies met inclusion criteria"),
("Population", "Stroke, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, acquired brain injury"),
("Interventions", "RAGT, exoskeletons, BCI, VR feedback, neuromodulation combinations"),
("Key Requirement", "Neurophysiological (EEG, EMG, TMS) or neuroimaging (fMRI) outcomes"),
],
"inclusion_exclusion": (
"Inclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Robotic rehabilitation targeting lower limb function\n"
"- Neurological disorder populations (stroke, SCI, CP, TBI)\n"
"- Neurophysiological or neuroimaging measures of neuroplasticity reported\n"
"- Studies from 2014–2025\n"
"- Published in English in peer-reviewed journals\n\n"
"Exclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Upper limb robotic rehabilitation only\n"
"- Studies without neuroplasticity/neuroimaging outcomes\n"
"- Non-robotic interventions\n"
"- Conference abstracts or non-peer-reviewed publications\n"
"- Non-neurological populations"
),
"outcome_measures": (
"Primary Outcomes (Neuroplasticity Markers):\n"
"- Cortical activation changes (fMRI, EEG)\n"
"- Corticospinal excitability (TMS-evoked MEPs)\n"
"- Functional connectivity changes (resting-state fMRI, EEG)\n"
"- Corticomotor reorganization patterns\n\n"
"Clinical Outcomes:\n"
"- Gait speed and endurance\n"
"- Balance (Berg Balance Scale, BESTest)\n"
"- Motor function (Fugl-Meyer, ASIA Scale)\n"
"- Functional independence (FIM, Barthel Index)\n\n"
"Interventions Reviewed:\n"
"RAGT (Lokomat, Ekso, ReWalk), exoskeletons,\n"
"BCI + FES, VR augmented training"
),
"results": (
"25 studies included across stroke, SCI, CP, and brain injury populations.\n\n"
"Key Findings:\n\n"
"Neuroplasticity: Robot-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT) and exoskeleton-based therapies produced "
"measurable increases in cortical activation and improvements in functional connectivity.\n\n"
"Corticospinal Changes: Changes in corticospinal excitability documented via TMS across multiple studies.\n\n"
"Adjunctive Technologies: BCI integration, VR feedback, and neuromodulation (rTMS, tDCS) when added "
"to robotic training further enhanced neuroplasticity outcomes.\n\n"
"Clinical Gains: Consistent improvements in gait, balance, and motor function aligned with neuroplastic changes.\n\n"
"Robotic interventions combined with neuromodulation or VR catalyze neuroplasticity in ways that produce "
"clinically meaningful gains — supporting multimodal, tailored rehabilitation strategies."
),
"conclusion": (
"Robotic rehabilitation — particularly RAGT and exoskeleton-based therapy — promotes neuroplasticity "
"in neurological disorders, with evidence from neurophysiology and neuroimaging.\n\n"
"Combining robotics with BCI, VR, or neuromodulation appears to produce additive neuroplastic effects "
"and superior clinical outcomes compared to robotics alone.\n\n"
"These findings underscore the transformative potential of tailored, multimodal robotic rehabilitation for "
"neurological recovery, including post-stroke rehabilitation.\n\n"
"Limitations:\n"
"- Heterogeneous populations, protocols, and outcome measures\n"
"- Small sample sizes in many individual studies\n"
"- Variable quality and risk of bias\n"
"- Long-term neuroplastic effects not well studied\n\n"
"Future Direction: Larger, standardized RCTs with neuroimaging outcomes are needed."
),
},
# ── ARTICLE 5 ──
{
"title": "Acupuncture Combined with Rehabilitation Robot for Recovery of Hemiplegia after Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs",
"authors": "Li Geng, Wang Quan, Li Li, Xu Yu, Zhao Xin, Liu Shuangli",
"affiliations": "China (multiple rehabilitation institutions)",
"journal": "Frontiers in Neurology",
"timeline": "Search up to November 2025 | Published: 2026",
"database": "PubMed / Frontiers (PMID: 42037705) | DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1789103 | PROSPERO: CRD420251155831",
"keywords": "Acupuncture; Rehabilitation robot; Ischemic stroke; Hemiplegia; Fugl-Meyer; Barthel Index; Motor function",
"study_type": "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)",
"introduction": (
"Post-stroke hemiplegia — motor paralysis on one side of the body — is one of the most disabling consequences "
"of ischemic stroke, with persistent motor impairment in the majority of survivors.\n"
"Rehabilitation robots (RR) provide high-repetition, task-specific, dose-controlled training that promotes "
"neuroplasticity-based motor recovery.\n"
"Acupuncture is a traditional medicine intervention with proposed neuromodulatory effects, including "
"enhanced cortical excitability and improved sensorimotor integration.\n"
"The combination of acupuncture with robotic therapy has been studied in multiple RCTs, but the "
"cumulative evidence has not been rigorously synthesized — this meta-analysis fills that gap."
),
"methodology_rows": [
("Parameter", "Details"),
("Study Design", "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA guidelines)"),
("Databases", "8 electronic databases (PubMed, CNKI, Wan Fang, others)"),
("Search Date", "Up to November 29, 2025"),
("Studies Included", "20 RCTs with 1,594 patients"),
("Population", "Subacute phase hemiplegia after ischemic stroke"),
("Intervention", "Acupuncture + Rehabilitation Robot vs. Robot alone or conventional PT"),
("Risk of Bias", "Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool; Meta-analysis with R software v4.5.1"),
],
"inclusion_exclusion": (
"Inclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)\n"
"- Adults with hemiplegia in subacute phase of ischemic stroke\n"
"- Combined acupuncture and rehabilitation robot as intervention\n"
"- Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) or Barthel Index (BI) as outcomes\n"
"- Published in any language\n\n"
"Exclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Non-randomized studies\n"
"- Hemorrhagic stroke\n"
"- Chronic stroke (>6 months)\n"
"- Acupuncture or robot therapy alone (without the combined approach)\n"
"- Insufficient data for meta-analysis\n"
"- Duplicate publications"
),
"outcome_measures": (
"Primary Outcomes:\n"
"1. Motor function — Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)\n"
"2. Motor function — Fugl-Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity (FMA-LE)\n"
"3. Activities of Daily Living — Barthel Index (BI)\n\n"
"Secondary Outcome:\n"
"4. Effective Rate (proportion of patients achieving clinical response)\n\n"
"Statistical Analysis:\n"
"- Mean Difference (MD) with 95% Confidence Interval for continuous outcomes\n"
"- Risk Ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes\n"
"- Random-effects model for heterogeneity\n"
"- Sensitivity analyses to confirm robustness\n"
"- Subgroup analysis by baseline FMA-UE score"
),
"results": (
"Combination Therapy (Acupuncture + Robot) was consistently superior across all outcomes:\n\n"
"FMA-UE (Upper Extremity Motor Function):\n"
"MD = +9.80 points (95% CI: 8.04–11.56) — p < 0.001\n\n"
"FMA-LE (Lower Extremity Motor Function):\n"
"MD = +4.00 points (95% CI: 2.79–5.21) — p < 0.001\n\n"
"Barthel Index (Daily Living Activities):\n"
"MD = +8.29 points (95% CI: 6.62–9.95) — p < 0.001\n\n"
"Effective Rate:\n"
"RR = 1.17 (95% CI: 1.08–1.27) — 17% more likely to achieve clinical response\n\n"
"Subgroup Analysis:\n"
"Patients with poorer baseline function (FMA-UE < 20) benefited most from combination therapy.\n\n"
"Safety: Favorable safety profile — no serious adverse events reported."
),
"conclusion": (
"Acupuncture combined with rehabilitation robot is an effective and safe intervention for improving "
"motor function and daily living activities in patients with post-ischemic stroke hemiplegia in the subacute phase.\n\n"
"The combination produced significantly greater improvements than robot therapy alone or conventional PT "
"on Fugl-Meyer (UE and LE) and Barthel Index.\n\n"
"Patients with the most severe baseline impairment (FMA-UE < 20) gained the greatest benefit — "
"suggesting this combination is particularly valuable for severely affected patients.\n\n"
"Limitations:\n"
"- All included studies were from China — results may not generalize to other populations\n"
"- Heterogeneity in acupuncture protocols and robot types\n"
"- High risk of performance bias (blinding difficult for acupuncture)\n"
"- Short follow-up periods in most studies"
),
},
# ── ARTICLE 6 ──
{
"title": "Restoring Interhemispheric Symmetry in Patients With Stroke Following Bilateral or Unilateral Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Rehabilitation: A Pilot RCT",
"authors": "Mauro M C, Fasano A, Germanotta M, Cortellini L, Insalaco S, Pavan A",
"affiliations": "IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy",
"journal": "IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering",
"timeline": "Published: 2024",
"database": "PubMed (PMID: 39269794) | DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3460485",
"keywords": "Stroke rehabilitation; Robotic upper limb; Interhemispheric symmetry; EEG; Neuroplasticity; Bilateral training",
"study_type": "Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial",
"introduction": (
"Upper limb motor impairment after stroke is caused by disruption of interhemispheric balance — "
"the unaffected hemisphere becomes overactive while the affected hemisphere shows reduced cortical excitability.\n"
"Robot-assisted rehabilitation provides high-dose, precisely controlled repetitive movement training "
"that is superior to conventional therapy in inducing neuroplasticity.\n"
"Bilateral robotic training (training both arms simultaneously) theoretically restores interhemispheric "
"balance through bilateral sensorimotor coupling.\n"
"This pilot RCT used Quantitative EEG (qEEG) — specifically the Brain Symmetry Index (BSI) — "
"to directly measure whether bilateral vs. unilateral robotic training restores interhemispheric symmetry in stroke patients."
),
"methodology_rows": [
("Parameter", "Details"),
("Study Design", "Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial"),
("Sample Size", "19 patients with ischemic stroke"),
("Phase", "Subacute stroke (within 6 months of onset)"),
("Intervention", "30-session upper limb neurorehabilitation with bilateral exoskeleton"),
("Group 1 (BG, n=10)", "Bilateral robotic training (both arms simultaneously)"),
("Group 2 (UG, n=9)", "Unilateral robotic training (affected arm only)"),
("Assessment", "Quantitative EEG (qEEG), clinical scales at T0, T0.5, T1, T2"),
],
"inclusion_exclusion": (
"Inclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Diagnosis of ischemic stroke (confirmed by CT/MRI)\n"
"- Subacute phase (within 6 months of stroke onset)\n"
"- Upper limb motor deficit present\n"
"- Able to tolerate robotic rehabilitation sessions\n"
"- No severe cognitive impairment or aphasia\n\n"
"Exclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Hemorrhagic stroke\n"
"- Severe spasticity (MAS > 2)\n"
"- Significant pain or musculoskeletal disorders in upper limbs\n"
"- Implanted metal devices or pacemaker (EEG contraindication)\n"
"- Previous neurological disorders\n"
"- Unable to participate in 30-session protocol"
),
"outcome_measures": (
"Primary Outcome (Neurophysiological):\n"
"- Pairwise-derived Brain Symmetry Index (pdBSI) measured by quantitative EEG\n"
"- Assessed in delta, theta, alpha, beta frequency bands\n"
"- Evaluated at eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions\n\n"
"Assessment Timeline:\n"
"- T0: Baseline (before first session)\n"
"- T0.5: After first treatment session\n"
"- T1: After 30 sessions (post-intervention)\n"
"- T2: 1-week follow-up\n\n"
"Clinical Scales:\n"
"- Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE)\n"
"- Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)\n"
"- Functional Independence Measure (FIM)\n"
"- Box and Block Test (BBT)"
),
"results": (
"Clinical Outcomes:\n"
"Both bilateral (BG) and unilateral (UG) groups showed significant clinical improvement in upper limb "
"function (FMA-UE) after 30 sessions — no significant difference between groups.\n\n"
"EEG / Neurophysiological Findings:\n"
"- Only the Bilateral Group (BG) showed significantly reduced pdBSI in delta and theta frequency bands after treatment\n"
"- This indicates bilateral training selectively restored interhemispheric symmetry\n"
"- UG showed no significant change in pdBSI\n\n"
"In the sensorimotor channel cluster: No significant difference in pdBSI change between groups.\n\n"
"Follow-up (T2): The EEG symmetry changes were NOT maintained at 1-week follow-up.\n\n"
"Key Insight: Interhemispheric symmetry restoration (via pdBSI) correlates with clinical upper limb improvement, "
"suggesting pdBSI as a promising biomarker for robotic rehabilitation response."
),
"conclusion": (
"Both bilateral and unilateral robotic rehabilitation produce equivalent clinical improvements in upper limb "
"function in subacute stroke patients.\n\n"
"However, bilateral training uniquely restores interhemispheric EEG symmetry (in delta/theta bands), "
"suggesting a distinct neuroplastic mechanism compared to unilateral training.\n\n"
"The pdBSI (Brain Symmetry Index) shows promise as a neurophysiological biomarker to monitor neuroplasticity "
"during stroke rehabilitation and guide treatment decisions.\n\n"
"Limitations:\n"
"- Small pilot study (n=19) — limited statistical power\n"
"- EEG symmetry changes not maintained at 1-week follow-up\n"
"- Short-term follow-up only\n"
"- No sham control group\n"
"- Predominantly male sample — limited generalizability"
),
},
# ── ARTICLE 7 ──
{
"title": "Early Mobilization in Acute Stroke Phase: A Systematic Review",
"authors": "Miranda Jessica Mariana de Aquino, Borges Viviany Mendes, Bazan Rodrigo, Luvizutto Gustavo Jose, Shinosaki Jullyanna Sabrysna Morais",
"affiliations": "UNESP — Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil",
"journal": "Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation",
"timeline": "Received: 2021 | Published: March 2023",
"database": "PubMed (PMID: 34927568) | DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2021.2008595",
"keywords": "Stroke; Early mobilization; Acute phase; Functional outcomes; Sitting; Standing; Walking",
"study_type": "Systematic Review",
"introduction": (
"Early mobilization (EM) is defined as out-of-bed activities initiated in the acute phase of stroke, "
"including elevation of the headboard, sitting, standing, and walking.\n"
"Immobility after stroke leads to major complications — deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, pressure sores, "
"deconditioning, and prolonged disability.\n"
"Early PT mobilization is recommended in international stroke guidelines, but the optimal timing, "
"intensity, and type of early activities remain debated.\n"
"This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness and safety of early mobilization in the acute stroke phase, "
"synthesizing evidence from 7 clinical trials involving 8,663 patients."
),
"methodology_rows": [
("Parameter", "Details"),
("Study Design", "Systematic Review"),
("Databases", "NLM, LILACS, MEDLINE, PEDro, Science Direct"),
("Search Period", "Up to June 2020"),
("Studies Included", "7 clinical trials; 8,663 patients"),
("Population", "Stroke patients in the acute phase"),
("Intervention", "Early mobilization (any out-of-bed activity)"),
("Quality Assessment", "Grading of Recommendations (GRADE); Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence"),
],
"inclusion_exclusion": (
"Inclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Randomized or quasi-randomized clinical trials\n"
"- Stroke patients in the acute phase of illness\n"
"- Early mobilization as the primary intervention\n"
"- Functional outcomes reported (e.g., mRS, Barthel Index)\n"
"- Published up to June 2020\n\n"
"Exclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Non-clinical trial designs (observational, case studies)\n"
"- Chronic or subacute stroke patients\n"
"- Mobilization outside the acute phase\n"
"- Non-English and non-Portuguese studies (in some databases)\n"
"- Studies without functional outcomes"
),
"outcome_measures": (
"Primary Outcome:\n"
"- Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months post-stroke\n"
" (measures disability / functional independence)\n\n"
"Secondary Outcomes:\n"
"- Functional capacity at discharge and follow-up\n"
"- Complications (DVT, pneumonia, falls, adverse events)\n"
"- Length of hospital stay\n"
"- Mortality\n\n"
"Activities Assessed:\n"
"- Headboard elevation\n"
"- Sitting out of bed\n"
"- Standing\n"
"- Walking (supervised and independent)\n\n"
"Safety: Monitored through adverse event reporting in each study."
),
"results": (
"7 studies, 8,663 patients included in qualitative synthesis.\n\n"
"Key Findings:\n\n"
"Timing: Optimal mobilization start is >24 hours post-stroke (not ultra-early at <24 hours) "
"— based on hemodynamic stability and safety criteria. The A-VERO and AVERT trials confirmed "
"that very early mobilization (<24h) may be detrimental.\n\n"
"Two studies showed that early mobilization (>24h, once hemodynamically stable) "
"significantly improves functional capacity after stroke.\n\n"
"Duration: Recommended 15–45 minutes per session.\n\n"
"Frequency: 1–3 sessions per day.\n\n"
"Activity Progression: Sitting → Standing → Walking.\n\n"
"Safety: Early mobilization was generally safe when initiated after hemodynamic stabilization, "
"with acceptable adverse event rates."
),
"conclusion": (
"Early mobilization in the acute stroke phase is effective and safe when initiated >24 hours "
"after stroke onset in hemodynamically stable patients.\n\n"
"Recommended Protocol:\n"
"- Start: >24 hours post-stroke\n"
"- Duration: 15–45 minutes per session\n"
"- Frequency: 1–3 sessions per day\n"
"- Focus: Sitting → Standing → Walking progression\n\n"
"Ultra-early mobilization (<24 hours) should be avoided as evidence suggests it may worsen outcomes.\n\n"
"Limitations:\n"
"- Only 7 studies met criteria — limited evidence base\n"
"- Heterogeneity in mobilization protocols\n"
"- Variable definitions of 'early mobilization'\n"
"- Risk of bias in some included trials\n\n"
"Clinical Implication: PT teams should begin structured mobilization >24 hours post-stroke in stable patients."
),
},
# ── ARTICLE 8 ──
{
"title": "Impact of Early Mobilization on Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Thrombolysis or Thrombectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial",
"authors": "Yen Hsiao-Ching, Pan Guan-Shuo, Jeng Jiann-Shing, Chen Wen-Shiang",
"affiliations": "National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan",
"journal": "Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair",
"timeline": "Published: March 2024",
"database": "PubMed (PMID: 38426480) | DOI: 10.1177/15459683241236443",
"keywords": "Early mobilization; Acute ischemic stroke; Thrombolysis; Mechanical thrombectomy; FIM; PASS; PT rehabilitation",
"study_type": "Randomized Controlled Trial",
"introduction": (
"Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are the main medical interventions "
"for acute ischemic stroke — they recanalize occluded cerebral vessels and reduce disability.\n"
"However, after IVT or MT, there is concern that early out-of-bed mobilization may increase the risk "
"of hemorrhagic complications, vessel re-occlusion, or hemodynamic instability.\n"
"Early Physical Therapy mobilization (within 24–72 hours) is widely recommended post-stroke, "
"but evidence specifically in patients who have received IVT or MT is scarce.\n"
"This RCT directly addresses whether early PT mobilization is safe and effective after thrombolysis "
"and mechanical thrombectomy — the two most common acute treatments for cerebral thrombosis."
),
"methodology_rows": [
("Parameter", "Details"),
("Study Design", "Randomized Controlled Trial"),
("Sample Size", "122 patients (60 post-IVT; 62 post-MT)"),
("Intervention", "Early mobilization protocol: 30 min/day, 5 days/week until discharge"),
("Control", "Standard early rehabilitation (same time and frequency)"),
("Start of PT", "Within 24–72 hours post-thrombolysis or thrombectomy"),
("Duration", "Until hospital discharge"),
("Primary Outcome Tool", "FIM-motor (Functional Independence Measure, motor domain)"),
],
"inclusion_exclusion": (
"Inclusion Criteria:\n"
"- First-ever acute ischemic stroke\n"
"- Treated with IV thrombolysis (IVT) or mechanical thrombectomy (MT)\n"
"- Admitted to stroke unit\n"
"- Hemodynamically stable within 24–72 hours\n"
"- Able to participate in rehabilitation protocol\n\n"
"Exclusion Criteria:\n"
"- Previous stroke with residual disability\n"
"- Severe hemorrhagic transformation post-thrombolysis\n"
"- Medical instability (unstable BP, O2 < 92%, severe cardiac arrhythmia)\n"
"- Severe cognitive impairment\n"
"- Pre-existing major mobility limitations\n"
"- Refusal to participate"
),
"outcome_measures": (
"Primary Outcome:\n"
"- FIM-motor (Functional Independence Measure — motor domain): measures functional ability in mobility,\n"
" transfers, locomotion, and self-care\n\n"
"Secondary Outcomes:\n"
"- PASS (Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients): balance and postural control\n"
"- FAC (Functional Ambulation Category): walking independence level\n"
"- Total length of stay in stroke unit\n\n"
"Assessment Timeline:\n"
"- Baseline (pre-intervention)\n"
"- 2-week post-stroke\n"
"- 4-week post-stroke\n"
"- 3-month post-stroke\n\n"
"Safety Monitoring:\n"
"- Adverse events (symptomatic hemorrhage, falls, re-occlusion)"
),
"results": (
"Both IVT and MT cohorts were analyzed separately:\n\n"
"IVT Group (n=60):\n"
"- Early mobilization (EM) group showed significantly better FIM-motor performance than control "
"within 1 month post-stroke (p < 0.05)\n"
"- EM group also showed better PASS scores at 2-week and 4-week assessments\n"
"- Early PT is SAFE and EFFECTIVE after IV thrombolysis\n\n"
"MT Group (n=62):\n"
"- Both EM and control groups showed improved FIM-motor and PASS scores over time\n"
"- However, the EM advantage did NOT reach statistical significance in the MT cohort\n\n"
"Safety: No significant increase in hemorrhagic complications, falls, or adverse events in the "
"early mobilization groups of either cohort.\n\n"
"Key Clinical Message: Early PT mobilization is safe after both IVT and MT, and produces "
"superior functional outcomes when initiated after thrombolysis."
),
"conclusion": (
"Early physical therapy mobilization (within 24–72 hours) is safe after both IV thrombolysis and "
"mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.\n\n"
"After IV thrombolysis: Early mobilization produced significantly better functional independence "
"(FIM-motor) within 1 month — supporting early PT initiation post-IVT.\n\n"
"After Mechanical Thrombectomy: Both groups improved but EM advantage was not statistically significant "
"in this cohort — larger studies are needed for MT patients.\n\n"
"Limitations:\n"
"- Single center (National Taiwan University Hospital)\n"
"- Relatively small MT cohort (n=62)\n"
"- Assessment of FIM-motor at 3 months was the longest follow-up\n"
"- EM protocol was same intensity as standard care — only timing differed\n\n"
"Clinical Implication: PT teams should confidently initiate early mobilization in stable post-IVT patients. "
"Further evidence is needed for optimal PT timing in post-MT patients."
),
},
]
# ─── Build Presentation ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# We will use the existing template presentation (30 slides).
# Strategy: use slides 2 and 3 as the pattern templates for article slides.
# We duplicate them repeatedly and then edit content.
# Use python-pptx's add_slide to add new slides using appropriate layouts.
# Slide 2 uses layout "Title and Content" → use this for article header slides and content slides.
# Load fresh copy
prs2 = Presentation(TEMPLATE)
# Keep only slide 1 (the title slide) — delete slides 2..30
# We'll rebuild the deck slide by slide.
# Get slide layout indices
slide_layout_names = [layout.name for layout in prs2.slide_layouts]
print("Available layouts:", slide_layout_names)
# Find "Title and Content" layout index
tc_idx = next((i for i, n in enumerate(slide_layout_names) if 'Title and Content' in n), 1)
title_only_idx = next((i for i, n in enumerate(slide_layout_names) if 'Title Slide' in n), 0)
print(f"Title layout idx: {title_only_idx}, Title+Content idx: {tc_idx}")
Dont make PPT, only provide me the content to make ppt in this pattern from these articles
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Case Report (Single Patient) |
| Patient | 65-year-old female with hypertension |
| Diagnosis | Subdural hematoma secondary to DACA aneurysm rupture |
| Surgical Procedure | DACA aneurysm clipping surgery |
| Post-op Status | Right-side disability (hemiparesis) |
| PT Interventions | Therapeutic exercises, gait training, balance exercises, functional training |
| Session Frequency | Regular sessions with periodic re-assessment |
| Assessment Tools | Functional Independence Measure (FIM), motor function scales |
| Intervention | Goal |
|---|---|
| Therapeutic exercises | Progressive strengthening of right-side limbs |
| Gait training | Parallel bars → supervised → independent ambulation |
| Balance exercises | Static and dynamic balance training |
| Functional training | ADL practice — dressing, bathing, transfers |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled pilot trial |
| Sample Size | 60 patients with aneurysmal SAH |
| Eligibility | WFNS scale grade 1–4 following aneurysmal SAH |
| Intervention | 10 days of transcutaneous electrical TNS (trigeminal nerve stimulation) |
| Control | Sham stimulation for 10 days |
| Follow-up | 3-month MRI assessment |
| Primary Outcome | Radiological incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) on MRI at 3 months |
| Allocation | Computer-generated randomization; double-blind |
| Outcome | Measurement Tool | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Primary: Cerebral infarction rate | MRI brain | At 3 months |
| Vasospasm occurrence | Transcranial Doppler (TCD) | Daily monitoring |
| Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI) | Clinical + MRI criteria | At 3 months |
| Neurological outcome | Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) | At 3 months |
| Safety | Adverse event recording | Throughout |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| Databases Searched | Cochrane Stroke Group Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase + 4 additional databases |
| Search Date | Up to September 2023 |
| Studies Included | 190 RCTs; 7,188 participants (119 newly added in this edition) |
| Comparison | VR vs. alternative therapy OR VR vs. no intervention |
| Study Population | Adults after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, any stage |
| Quality Assessment | Cochrane RoB 1 tool; GRADE certainty of evidence |
| Statistical Analysis | Fixed-effect meta-analysis; Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with 95% CI |
| Outcome | Assessment Tool |
|---|---|
| Gait speed | 10-Meter Walk Test |
| Balance | Berg Balance Scale (BBS) |
| Global cognitive function | MoCA, MMSE |
| Activity limitation | Barthel Index, FIM |
| Participation restriction | SIS, Participation scale |
| Quality of life | SF-36, EQ-5D |
| Adverse events | Falls, pain, fatigue, dropout |
| Outcome | SMD | Studies / N | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upper limb function | 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12–0.28) | 67 studies, 2,830 participants | LOW |
| Balance | 0.26 (95% CI: 0.12–0.40) | 24 studies, 871 participants | LOW |
| Activity limitation (ADLs) | 0.21 (95% CI: 0.11–0.32) | 33 studies, 1,495 participants | MODERATE |
| Gait speed | No significant effect | 10 studies, 304 participants | VERY LOW |
| Quality of life | 0.11 (no significance) | 16 studies, 963 participants | LOW |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Systematic Review (PRISMA guidelines) |
| Databases | PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, EBSCOhost, Scopus |
| Search Period | 2014–2025 |
| Initial Records | 12,769 records identified |
| Final Inclusion | 25 studies met all inclusion criteria |
| Populations | Stroke, Spinal Cord Injury, Cerebral Palsy, Acquired Brain Injury |
| Interventions | RAGT, exoskeletons, BCI, VR feedback, combined neuromodulation |
| Key Requirement | Must include neurophysiological (EEG/TMS/EMG) or neuroimaging (fMRI) outcomes |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA guidelines) |
| Databases | 8 electronic databases (PubMed, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, EMBASE, Cochrane, others) |
| Search Date | Up to November 29, 2025 |
| RCTs Included | 20 RCTs; 1,594 patients total |
| Population | Subacute phase hemiplegia after ischemic stroke |
| Intervention | Acupuncture + Rehabilitation Robot therapy |
| Comparator | Rehabilitation Robot alone OR Conventional PT |
| Risk of Bias | Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool; Meta-analysis with R software v4.5.1 |
| Outcome | Tool | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Upper limb motor function | Fugl-Meyer UE (FMA-UE) | Motor recovery of the arm and hand |
| Lower limb motor function | Fugl-Meyer LE (FMA-LE) | Motor recovery of the leg |
| Activities of Daily Living | Barthel Index (BI) | Functional independence in ADLs |
| Outcome | Mean Difference (MD) | 95% Confidence Interval | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| FMA-UE (Upper Limb) | +9.80 points | 8.04 – 11.56 | p < 0.001 |
| FMA-LE (Lower Limb) | +4.00 points | 2.79 – 5.21 | p < 0.001 |
| Barthel Index (ADLs) | +8.29 points | 6.62 – 9.95 | p < 0.001 |
| Effective Rate (RR) | 1.17 | 1.08 – 1.27 | p < 0.001 |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Sample Size | 19 patients with ischemic stroke |
| Phase | Subacute stroke (within 6 months of onset) |
| Device | Bilateral upper limb exoskeleton robot |
| Total Sessions | 30 sessions |
| Group 1 — Bilateral (BG, n=10) | Both arms trained simultaneously |
| Group 2 — Unilateral (UG, n=9) | Affected arm only trained |
| Neural Assessment | Quantitative EEG (qEEG) — Brain Symmetry Index (pdBSI) |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Systematic Review |
| Databases | NLM, LILACS, MEDLINE, PEDro, Science Direct |
| Search Period | Up to June 2020 |
| Studies Included | 7 clinical trials; 8,663 patients |
| Population | Stroke patients in the acute phase |
| Intervention | Early mobilization (any out-of-bed activity in acute phase) |
| Quality Assessment | GRADE; Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) |
| Risk of Bias | Two independent authors assessed all included studies |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Sample Size | 122 patients (60 post-IVT; 62 post-MT) |
| Intervention | Early mobilization: 30 min/day, 5 days/week until discharge |
| Control | Standard early rehabilitation (same duration and frequency) |
| Key Difference | Intervention group: earlier and more progressive mobilization protocol |
| Start Timing | Within 24–72 hours post-thrombolysis or post-thrombectomy |
| Duration | Until hospital discharge from stroke unit |
| Setting | National Taiwan University Hospital (single center) |
| # | Article | Journal | Year | Design | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Physiotherapy after DACA Aneurysm Clipping | Cureus | 2024 | Case Report | Early PT improves motor function and independence post-aneurysm surgery |
| 2 | TRIVASOSTIM — TNS for Vasospasm Post-SAH | Int J Environ Res Public Health | 2023 | RCT | TNS did not reduce cerebral infarction; safe but inconclusive |
| 3 | Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation | Cochrane Database Syst Rev | 2025 | Cochrane Review (190 RCTs) | VR improves UL function (low certainty) and ADLs (moderate certainty) |
| 4 | Robotics and Neuroplasticity in Lower Limb Rehab | Neurosci Biobehav Rev | 2026 | Systematic Review | RAGT + exoskeletons produce measurable neuroplastic changes |
| 5 | Acupuncture + Robot for Post-Stroke Hemiplegia | Frontiers in Neurology | 2026 | Meta-Analysis (20 RCTs) | Combination superior: FMA-UE +9.8, FMA-LE +4.0, BI +8.3 |
| 6 | Bilateral vs. Unilateral Robotic Upper Limb Rehab | IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng | 2024 | Pilot RCT | Bilateral training restores interhemispheric EEG symmetry |
| 7 | Early Mobilization in Acute Stroke | Topics in Stroke Rehabil | 2023 | Systematic Review | Best timing: >24h; 15–45 min; 1–3x/day; Sit→Stand→Walk |
| 8 | Early PT after Thrombolysis/Thrombectomy | Neurorehabil Neural Repair | 2024 | RCT | Early PT safe and effective post-IVT; safe post-MT |
provide me some more articles for the same centred to aneurysm and thrombosis PT management
rehabilitation physiotherapy subarachnoid hemorrhage aneurysm recovery
physical therapy cerebral venous thrombosis sinus thrombosis rehabilitation
exercise training cerebrovascular disease neurological rehabilitation outcomes
PMID: 33150572
PMID: 38429610
PMID: 38288164
fatigue cognitive rehabilitation subarachnoid hemorrhage aneurysmal long term
neurorehabilitation intracranial thrombosis mechanical thrombectomy recovery functional outcome
constraint induced movement therapy CIMT stroke hemiplegia upper limb
transcranial magnetic stimulation TMS motor cortex stroke cerebrovascular rehabilitation
PMID: 39932103
PMID: 41707126
PMID: 35852005
mirror therapy motor imagery stroke hemiplegia upper limb recovery
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Single-center Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial |
| Sample Size | 25 patients (SOC group = 13; NMES + HPRO group = 12) |
| Eligibility | aSAH with Hunt-Hess grade >1, modified Fisher score >1, BMI <40 kg/m² |
| Intervention | NMES to bilateral quadriceps (2 × 30-min sessions/day) + HPRO (goal 1.8 g/kg/day) |
| Control | Standard of care (SOC) for nutrition and mobilization |
| Duration | Post-bleed days 0–14 (2 weeks) |
| Primary Outcome | % change in quadriceps cross-sectional area on CT scan (baseline to day 14) |
| Follow-up | Assessments at post-bleed day (PBD) 14, 42, and 90 |
| Tool | What It Measures | Timepoints |
|---|---|---|
| SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery) | Physical function: balance, gait, chair stand | PBD 14, 42, 90 |
| MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) | Cognitive function | PBD 14, 42, 90 |
| mRS (modified Rankin Scale) | Global functional outcome/disability | PBD 14, 42, 90 |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Multicenter retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching |
| Setting | Multiple rehabilitation hospitals, Japan (2014–2019) |
| Total Screened | 718 patients with aSAH |
| Eligible Patients | 450 patients received PT (physical ± occupational therapy) |
| Early Mobilization Group | Walking training initiated within 14 days of aSAH onset (n=229) |
| Delayed Mobilization Group | Walking training initiated after 14 days of aSAH onset (n=221) |
| After Matching | 122 patients per group |
| Primary Outcome | Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge |
| Group | Favorable Outcome (mRS 0–2) |
|---|---|
| Early Mobilization (≤14 days) | 81.1% |
| Delayed Mobilization (>14 days) | 52.5% |
| Risk Difference | +28.7% (95% CI: 17.4–39.9) |
| Statistical Significance | p < 0.001 |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Case Report |
| Patient | 65-year-old male |
| Diagnosis | Left hemiplegia following SDH + SAH + pneumocephalus |
| Cause | Aneurysm rupture leading to subdural and subarachnoid bleeding |
| PT Intervention | Early mobilization, progressive strengthening, functional retraining |
| Rehabilitation Setting | Inpatient physiotherapy |
| Key Focus | Lower limb strength improvement and early functional mobility |
| Assessment | Pre- and post-intervention muscle strength and functional performance |
| Phase | Interventions |
|---|---|
| Early (Bed Phase) | Passive ROM, positioning, bed mobility training, breathing exercises |
| Intermediate | Active-assisted exercises, sitting balance, sit-to-stand training |
| Advanced | Standing balance, gait training with support, progressive strengthening |
| Functional | ADL training, stair climbing, community ambulation preparation |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Prospective Observational Cohort Study |
| Population | Patients who experienced aSAH at Sahlgrenska University Hospital |
| Assessment Points | 1 year (n=62) and 3 years (n=54) after aSAH |
| Primary Tool | Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) |
| Other Tools | Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ); Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4); Mental Fatigue Scale (MFS) |
| Focus | Long-term cognitive function, fatigue, satisfaction, and overall recovery trajectory |
| Key Variable | Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI) during acute phase as predictor |
| Tool | Domain Measured | Administered At |
|---|---|---|
| Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) | Overall functional recovery and disability | 1 year & 3 years |
| Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ) | Subjective quality of life and satisfaction | 1 year & 3 years |
| Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) | Ability, adjustment, and participation after acquired brain injury | 1 year & 3 years |
| Mental Fatigue Scale (MFS) | Self-reported mental fatigue severity | 1 year & 3 years |
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Design | Assessor-blinded Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial |
| Sample Size | 16 participants (chronic stroke ≥ 6 months) |
| Severity | Severe hand paresis: no 10° wrist/finger extension OR no MEP on TMS |
| Group 1 | 5-Hz rTMS → Contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC) |
| Group 2 | 5-Hz rTMS → Ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) |
| Combined PT | Upper extremity rehabilitation for 6 weeks (both groups) |
| Duration | 6 weeks total |
| Blinding | Assessors blinded to group allocation |
| Tool | Domain |
|---|---|
| Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) | Timed functional motor tasks |
| Stroke Impact Scale-16 (SIS-16) | Self-reported function and participation |
| Wrist Subscore (FMA) | Distal arm/wrist recovery specifically |
| Interhemispheric Inhibition (IHI) | Neurophysiological: transcallosal inhibition measurement |
| # | Article | Journal | Year | Design | Specific Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NMES + High-Protein After Aneurysmal SAH | Neurocritical Care | 2021 | Phase 2 RCT | NMES in ICU phase of aSAH — reduces muscle wasting, improves 3-month outcomes |
| 2 | Early Mobilization in Aneurysmal SAH (n=450) | Neurocritical Care | 2024 | Multicenter Cohort | Walking within 14 days of aSAH → 28.7% more favorable outcomes |
| 3 | Physiotherapy After SDH + SAH + Pneumocephalus | Cureus | 2023 | Case Report | PT for complex aneurysm-related hemorrhage — early mobilization improves strength and function |
| 4 | Long-Term Outcomes After Aneurysmal SAH (3 years) | Acta Neurol Scand | 2022 | Prospective Cohort | 57% mental fatigue at 1 year — PT must include cognitive and fatigue rehabilitation |
| 5 | rTMS for Severe Stroke Upper Limb Recovery | Am J Phys Med Rehabil | 2026 | Pilot RCT | rTMS + PT in severe cerebrovascular hemiplegia — both approaches produce sustained improvement |