I have everything I need. Let me write this comprehensive, deeply practical guide now.
How to Answer Internal Medicine Exam Questions and Score Well
This is a complete guide — covering every question type used in internal medicine exams, with real examples of how questions look, and step-by-step answer templates for each.
Part 1: The Five Question Types in Internal Medicine
Internal medicine exams use five main formats. Each tests a different cognitive skill.
| Format | What It Tests | Where It Appears |
|---|
| MCQ / SBA (clinical vignette) | Diagnosis, investigation, management decisions | USMLE, PLAB, shelf exams, ABIM, MRCPs |
| SAQ (Short Answer Question) | Structured clinical knowledge | Undergraduate finals, MRCP written |
| MEQ (Modified Essay Question) | Sequential clinical reasoning | Many undergraduate/postgraduate finals |
| Long Case / Short Case | Clinical skills + communication | Finals, postgraduate clinical exams |
| Viva Voce | Depth of reasoning under pressure | Final MB, MRCP PACES, fellowship exams |
════════════════════════════════════════
TYPE 1: MCQ / SINGLE BEST ANSWER (SBA)
════════════════════════════════════════
What These Questions Look Like
Every MCQ in internal medicine follows the clinical vignette format — a patient scenario followed by a question. Here are real examples across common question types:
▸ DIAGNOSIS QUESTION
A 68-year-old man presents with a 3-day history of progressive dyspnoea, orthopnoea, and ankle swelling. He has a background of hypertension and had a myocardial infarction 5 years ago. On examination his JVP is elevated, he has bibasal crackles, and pitting oedema to the knees. His chest X-ray shows cardiomegaly and bilateral perihilar shadowing.
What is the most likely diagnosis?
- A. Community-acquired pneumonia
- B. Pulmonary embolism
- C. Decompensated heart failure
- D. Bilateral pleural effusions due to malignancy
- E. Exacerbation of COPD
Answer: C
Why C and not the others:
- The combination of JVP elevation + bibasal crackles + bilateral ankle oedema + CXR showing cardiomegaly and perihilar shadowing = the classic tetrad of decompensated heart failure
- Prior MI (ischaemic aetiology) + hypertension (risk factor) supports the diagnosis
- Option A lacks the cardiac features and oedema
- Option B would not typically show bilateral perihilar shadowing or ankle oedema
- Option E lacks the cardiac signs; COPD causes hyperinflation, not cardiomegaly
▸ INVESTIGATION QUESTION
A 55-year-old woman with known atrial fibrillation presents acutely confused and dysarthric. Her symptoms started 1 hour ago. She is on warfarin with an INR of 1.8. Neurological examination reveals right facial droop and right-sided weakness.
What is the single most important immediate investigation?
- A. MRI brain with diffusion-weighted imaging
- B. Carotid Doppler ultrasound
- C. Non-contrast CT brain
- D. Echocardiogram
- E. Coagulation screen
Answer: C
Why C first:
- The priority is to distinguish ischaemic stroke from haemorrhagic stroke — because treatment (thrombolysis/anticoagulation) is dangerous if there is haemorrhage
- Non-contrast CT is fast, available, and sufficient to exclude haemorrhage — that is all you need right now
- MRI-DWI is more sensitive but takes longer and is not the immediate priority
- Carotid Doppler, echo, and coag screen are all important but come AFTER the CT
▸ MANAGEMENT QUESTION
A 72-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and stage 3 CKD (eGFR 35) presents with a fasting glucose of 14 mmol/L and HbA1c of 82 mmol/mol. He is currently on metformin 1g BD and gliclazide 80mg OD. His BP is 148/92 and his ACR is 45 mg/mmol.
Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in his management?
- A. Increase gliclazide to 160mg OD
- B. Add insulin
- C. Add an SGLT-2 inhibitor
- D. Stop metformin immediately
- E. Add a GLP-1 receptor agonist
Answer: C
Why C:
- SGLT-2 inhibitors (e.g., empagliflozin, dapagliflozin) are now first-line add-on agents in T2DM with CKD because of proven cardiorenal protection (EMPA-REG, CREDENCE, DAPA-CKD trials)
- His eGFR 35 is above the threshold to initiate (≥20) and ACR elevation makes him a priority
- Metformin should be reviewed at eGFR <30 but does not need to be stopped now at eGFR 35
- Gliclazide increase risks hypoglycaemia without cardiorenal benefit
- Insulin and GLP-1 are valid escalations but not the most appropriate next step given available evidence
▸ "NEXT BEST STEP" (Most Dangerous Question Type)
A 45-year-old man presents with sudden onset severe crushing central chest pain radiating to his left arm, diaphoresis, and nausea for 40 minutes. His ECG shows 3mm ST elevation in leads II, III, and aVF with reciprocal changes in I and aVL. His BP is 88/60 and HR is 110.
What is the single most appropriate immediate action?
- A. Administer IV morphine and GTN infusion
- B. Give aspirin 300mg and activate the catheter lab
- C. Perform urgent echocardiogram
- D. Administer IV fluids 500ml and reassess
- E. Give thrombolysis immediately
Answer: B
Reasoning:
- This is an inferior STEMI (ST elevation in II, III, aVF)
- The patient is haemodynamically compromised (BP 88/60) — this suggests right ventricular involvement (inferior MI + hypotension = RV MI until proven otherwise)
- Primary PCI is the treatment of choice and must be activated immediately
- Aspirin 300mg loading dose is the first pharmacological step
- IV fluids are given for RV MI hypotension but only AFTER diagnosis — not before catheter lab activation
- Option D is dangerous alone because fluids without knowing RV involvement could harm
- Thrombolysis is only given when PCI is unavailable within guideline windows
The SBA Method — 6 Steps to Every MCQ
STEP 1 → Read the LAST SENTENCE first (the actual question)
STEP 2 → Read the vignette with purpose — what do I need to answer THIS question?
STEP 3 → Extract: Age / Sex / Time course / Key symptoms / Key signs / Abnormal investigations
STEP 4 → Form your OWN answer BEFORE reading the options
STEP 5 → Match your answer to the option closest to what you thought
STEP 6 → If unsure: eliminate, then choose; avoid "always/never"; if two options are opposites, one is likely correct
Time management: 90 seconds per question maximum. Mark uncertain questions, continue, return later. Do not change answers without a specific clinical reason.
════════════════════════════════════════
TYPE 2: SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS (SAQs)
════════════════════════════════════════
What These Questions Look Like
SAQs come in two forms — direct questions and clinical scenario-based questions. Each mark = one specific expected point.
▸ DIRECT SAQ — Causes / List
Question: List SIX causes of macrocytic anaemia. (6 marks)
How to Answer:
- Write six distinct causes — one per line, labelled
- Do not explain unless asked ("List" = no explanation needed)
- Organise to show you know the classification
Answer:
1. Vitamin B12 deficiency (e.g., pernicious anaemia, malabsorption)
2. Folate deficiency (poor intake, malabsorption, increased demand e.g. pregnancy)
3. Hypothyroidism
4. Alcohol excess / liver disease
5. Myelodysplastic syndrome
6. Drugs — hydroxyurea, methotrexate, azathioprine (anti-metabolites)
What loses marks:
- Writing "anaemia of chronic disease" (that causes microcytic/normocytic, not macrocytic)
- Listing subtypes of the same cause as separate answers
- Adding explanation when not asked — wastes time
▸ DIRECT SAQ — Investigations
Question: A 35-year-old woman presents with fatigue, weight loss, palpitations, heat intolerance, and a smooth goitre. What investigations would you perform? (5 marks)
How to Answer — Use a tiered structure:
Answer:
1. Thyroid function tests (TFTs): TSH (suppressed in hyperthyroidism), free T4, free T3
2. Thyroid antibodies: TSH receptor antibodies (positive in Graves' disease)
3. Full blood count and ESR (baseline; exclude concurrent anaemia)
4. Thyroid ultrasound: assess goitre characteristics, exclude nodules
5. Radioactive iodine uptake scan (if USS shows nodular disease or diagnosis uncertain)
Tip: Always start with the most appropriate first-line test, then escalate. Examiners follow a marking scheme — if they have "TSH" as mark 1, writing it last still scores the mark, but logical ordering shows clinical thinking.
▸ SCENARIO-BASED SAQ — Management
Question: A 60-year-old man with known cirrhosis presents with haematemesis. He is pale, diaphoretic, and his BP is 90/60, HR 118. Outline your immediate management. (8 marks)
Golden rule: Every management SAQ is answered in the A–B–C–D structure first.
Answer:
A – Airway: Position patient, assess for vomiting/aspiration risk; consider anaesthetic review
B – Breathing: Apply high-flow O₂ via non-rebreather mask; monitor O₂ saturation
C – Circulation:
- 2 large-bore IV cannulae (14–16G)
- Urgent bloods: FBC, U&E, LFTs, coagulation (INR), group & crossmatch, blood cultures
- IV fluid resuscitation: 500ml 0.9% NaCl bolus and reassess
- Target systolic BP >90 mmHg; transfuse pRBC if Hb <70 g/L (or <80 in ACS)
- Blood products: FFP and platelets if coagulopathic (likely in cirrhosis)
D – Disability: GCS, blood glucose
Specific:
- IV terlipressin (vasoconstrictor — reduces portal pressure in suspected variceal bleed)
- IV ceftriaxone 1g OD (antibiotic prophylaxis — reduces mortality in cirrhotic bleeds)
- Insert NGT after stabilisation only if needed
- Urgent endoscopy (OGD) within 12 hours of resuscitation for diagnosis + treatment
(band ligation for varices; adrenaline injection / clips for peptic ulcer)
- Keep NBM, catheterise (monitor urine output ≥0.5 ml/kg/hr)
- Alert senior / GI/surgical team early
What scores maximum marks:
- ABCDE structure (even partial credit per step)
- Named drug + route (IV not just "give terlipressin")
- Specific thresholds (transfuse at Hb <70)
- Mentioning endoscopy — this is the definitive step, often forgotten
▸ SCENARIO SAQ — Interpretation
Question: Interpret this ABG: pH 7.28, PaCO₂ 28, HCO₃ 12, PaO₂ 88, on room air. What is the likely underlying cause in a patient with polyuria and polydipsia? (4 marks)
Universal ABG interpretation formula:
Step 1 — pH: 7.28 → ACIDOSIS
Step 2 — PaCO₂: 28 (low) → respiratory component is ALKALOTIC (not causing the acidosis)
Step 3 — HCO₃: 12 (low) → metabolic component is ACIDOTIC → PRIMARY METABOLIC ACIDOSIS
Step 4 — Compensation: Expected PaCO₂ = (1.5 × HCO₃) + 8 ± 2 = (1.5 × 12) + 8 = 26
Actual PaCO₂ is 28 → appropriate respiratory compensation
Step 5 — Anion gap: Not given full electrolytes here, but in context:
Answer:
Metabolic acidosis with appropriate respiratory compensation. In a patient with polyuria and polydipsia, this is consistent with DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS (DKA), which causes a HIGH ANION GAP metabolic acidosis (accumulation of ketoacids).
SAQ Scoring Rules
| Principle | Why It Matters |
|---|
| One mark = one specific point | Do not bundle two facts into one sentence |
| Match answer depth to mark allocation | 2-mark question → 2 specific points only |
| Use clinical terminology | "Orthopnoea" not "can't lie flat"; "haemoptysis" not "coughing blood" |
| Relevant negatives count | "No previous similar episodes" in a history adds diagnostic value |
| Never pad | Writing irrelevant content wastes time and does not score marks |
════════════════════════════════════════
TYPE 3: MODIFIED ESSAY QUESTION (MEQ)
════════════════════════════════════════
What These Questions Look Like
An MEQ reveals a clinical case in stages. Each part is answered in sequence — you cannot use information from Part B to answer Part A. This is the format closest to real clinical reasoning.
▸ FULL MEQ EXAMPLE (Internal Medicine)
Part A:
Mrs. RK, a 52-year-old teacher, presents to the outpatient clinic with a 6-week history of progressive dyspnoea on exertion, mild ankle swelling, and fatigue. She has a history of hypertension managed with amlodipine. On examination: BP 158/96, HR 96 bpm, RR 18, O₂ sat 94% on room air. JVP is raised at 4cm. Chest reveals bibasal dullness with reduced breath sounds at both bases. Heart sounds: S1 S2 + S3 gallop.
i) What is your working diagnosis? (2 marks)
ii) List THREE clinical signs that support your diagnosis. (3 marks)
Model Answer Part A:
i) Congestive cardiac failure (heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction)
ii)
1. Raised JVP (4cm above sternal angle) — elevated venous pressure from right heart failure
2. Bibasal dullness + reduced breath sounds — bilateral pleural effusions (transudates from raised hydrostatic pressure)
3. Third heart sound (S3 gallop) — indicates rapid ventricular filling; hallmark of dilated/failing ventricle
Part B:
You order investigations. Results: Hb 11.2 g/dL, Na 134, K 4.1, Creatinine 102, BNP 1850 pg/mL, ECG: sinus tachycardia, LVH voltage criteria. CXR: cardiomegaly, bilateral perihilar haziness, Kerley B lines, upper lobe diversion.
i) Interpret the BNP result. (1 mark)
ii) List THREE CXR findings supporting your diagnosis. (3 marks)
iii) What further investigation would you request to confirm and guide management? (2 marks)
Model Answer Part B:
i) BNP 1850 pg/mL is markedly elevated (normal <100 pg/mL); this confirms significant ventricular wall stress consistent with heart failure. It also has prognostic value — the higher the BNP, the worse the prognosis.
ii)
1. Cardiomegaly — cardiac shadow >50% of thoracic diameter on PA film
2. Kerley B lines — horizontal lines at periphery indicating interstitial oedema (lymphatic engorgement)
3. Upper lobe diversion — redistribution of blood flow to upper zones due to elevated LVEDP
iii)
- Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE): gold standard to assess ejection fraction, wall motion, valve function, and determine HFrEF vs. HFpEF — this directly guides management (e.g., ACE-inhibitor/beta-blocker for HFrEF)
Part C:
Echo shows LVEF 30%, dilated LV, no significant valvular disease. She is commenced on treatment.
i) List the THREE cornerstone drugs for this patient's condition with evidence base. (6 marks)
ii) What monitoring is required after starting these medications? (3 marks)
Model Answer Part C:
i)
1. ACE inhibitor (e.g., ramipril) — reduces mortality in HFrEF by blocking neurohormonal activation; proven in SOLVD, CONSENSUS trials (start low, titrate up)
2. Beta-blocker (e.g., carvedilol, bisoprolol, metoprolol succinate) — reduces mortality and hospitalisation; proven in MERIT-HF, COPERNICUS trials; start only when euvolaemic (not in acute decompensation)
3. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist/MRA (e.g., spironolactone or eplerenone) — reduces mortality when added to ACEI + BB; proven in RALES and EMPHASIS-HF trials; use if K⁺ < 5.0 and eGFR > 30
Bonus: SGLT-2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin/empagliflozin) — now class IA recommendation; DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials showed mortality + hospitalisation benefit
ii)
1. Renal function + electrolytes (U&E) at 1–2 weeks after starting ACEI/MRA and after each dose increase — risk of hyperkalaemia and AKI
2. BP monitoring — risk of hypotension especially with ACEI + BB combination
3. Repeat BNP/NT-proBNP at 3 months — guide response to therapy and assess prognostic trajectory
How to Excel in MEQs
| Rule | Explanation |
|---|
| Answer sequentially | Part A → B → C — do not cross-contaminate |
| Match depth to marks | 1 mark = 1 clinical fact. 3-mark answer = 3 distinct points |
| Show mechanism briefly | "Ramipril — ACEI — reduces afterload and neurohormonal activation" scores more than just "ramipril" |
| Use trial names where relevant | RALES, MERIT-HF, DAPA-HF — examiners reward evidence-based answers |
| Name specific drugs, not just classes | "Bisoprolol" is better than "a beta-blocker" |
════════════════════════════════════════
TYPE 4: LONG CASE / SHORT CASE
════════════════════════════════════════
What the Long Case Looks Like
You are given 45–60 minutes with a real patient. Then you present to examiners for 20–30 minutes. They interrupt, probe, and ask "what if" questions.
The Winning Presentation Structure
Opening (1 sentence):
"Mr. A is a 64-year-old retired engineer presenting with a 3-month history of progressive exertional dyspnoea and bilateral leg swelling, in the context of known hypertension and diabetes mellitus."
Presenting complaint + History of Presenting Complaint (HPC):
Tell the story chronologically. Include:
- Onset, duration, progression
- Associated symptoms (what else is going on)
- Relevant negatives (what is NOT there — equally important)
- Precipitating / relieving factors
"His dyspnoea is now limiting him to 50 metres on flat ground (NYHA Class III). He reports orthopnoea (sleeps on 3 pillows) and two episodes of paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea in the past month. He denies chest pain, haemoptysis, or fever."
Past Medical History:
List with duration and control status:
"Hypertension — diagnosed 10 years ago, treated with amlodipine; poorly controlled. Type 2 DM — 8 years, on metformin and gliclazide. No previous cardiac history or hospitalisations."
Drug History: All drugs + doses + allergies
Social History: Smoking (pack years), alcohol (units/week), occupation, functional status, living situation
Family History: First-degree relatives with IHD, cardiomyopathy, sudden death
Systems Review: Brief — highlight positives only
Examination Findings — How to Present
Cardiovascular exam:
"On general inspection, Mr. A is comfortable at rest but mildly breathless on minimal exertion. He has peripheral cyanosis and pitting oedema to the mid-shin bilaterally. JVP is elevated at 5cm with a prominent v-wave. The apex beat is displaced to the 6th intercostal space, anterior axillary line — consistent with cardiomegaly. Heart sounds S1 and S2 are present with an audible S3 gallop at the apex. Chest auscultation reveals fine bibasal crackles to the mid-zones. There is dullness to percussion at both bases."
The Summary Statement — Most Important Part
This is what examiners grade most harshly. It must be:
- Concise (2–3 sentences max)
- Diagnostic
- Confident
"In summary, Mr. A is a 64-year-old man with longstanding hypertension and diabetes presenting with progressive biventricular heart failure, most likely of hypertensive aetiology given his chronically uncontrolled blood pressure and absence of ischaemic features. His NYHA class III functional impairment with clinical, biochemical, and radiological signs of congestion warrants urgent echocardiography and optimisation of medical therapy."
Viva Questions After the Long Case — What Examiners Ask and How to Answer
| Question | Strategy |
|---|
| "What is your differential diagnosis?" | Lead with most likely, then 1–2 alternatives with distinguishing feature |
| "How would you investigate this patient?" | Structured: bloods → imaging → special tests. Justify each |
| "What would you do if his BP dropped?" | ABCDE response; think of reversible causes first |
| "What do you know about the prognosis of this condition?" | State objective markers (e.g., BNP, LVEF, NYHA class) + cite a statistic if you can |
| "What would you do if he refused treatment?" | Ethics: autonomy + capacity assessment + explore concerns + document |
| "What is the mechanism of action of bisoprolol here?" | Never say "I don't know." Say: "Bisoprolol is a selective β₁-blocker that reduces sympathetic drive to the failing myocardium, reducing HR and myocardial oxygen demand, and reversing adverse cardiac remodelling — proven to reduce mortality in HFrEF." |
════════════════════════════════════════
PART 2: HIGH-YIELD INTERNAL MEDICINE TOPICS
and How Questions Are Asked About Each
════════════════════════════════════════
The Most Commonly Tested Conditions — Question Style and Answer Template
1. CHEST PAIN / ACS
How questions are asked:
- "What is the diagnosis?" — ST elevation in V1–V4 → anterior STEMI
- "What do you do immediately?" — Activate cath lab; aspirin + P2Y12 inhibitor + anticoagulant
- "What complication has occurred?" — New pan-systolic murmur post-MI → ventricular septal defect or mitral regurgitation (papillary muscle rupture)
Key answer trigger phrases:
- Troponin rise = myocardial injury (NOT always MI — also myocarditis, PE, sepsis)
- Reciprocal ST depression = confirms true ST elevation
- New LBBB in chest pain = treat as STEMI
2. DYSPNOEA / RESPIRATORY
How questions are asked:
- "Spirometry shows FEV₁/FVC 0.64, FEV₁ 55% predicted. What diagnosis?" → Obstructive (COPD or asthma)
- "FEV₁/FVC 0.82, FEV₁ 60% predicted?" → Restrictive (pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis)
- "What is the most appropriate long-term oxygen therapy criterion?" → PaO₂ <7.3 kPa at rest on 2 separate occasions
3. ALTERED CONSCIOUSNESS / NEUROLOGY
Common stem: "65-year-old found unresponsive at home. GCS 9. Temp 38.5, neck stiffness, photophobia."
Answer structure:
- Most likely diagnosis: Bacterial meningitis
- Do NOT delay treatment for LP — give IV ceftriaxone immediately if LP will be delayed >1 hour
- Give dexamethasone before first dose of antibiotics (reduces inflammation, improves outcomes)
- CT head first only if: focal neurological deficit, immunocompromised, papilloedema, seizure, GCS <13
4. ELECTROLYTES / METABOLIC
Question pattern: "Na 122 mmol/L, urine osmolality 540 mOsm/kg, urine Na 58 mmol/L, patient euvolaemic."
SIADH diagnosis checklist:
- Hyponatraemia (low serum Na)
- Serum hypo-osmolality (<275 mOsm/kg)
- Inappropriately concentrated urine (>100 mOsm/kg)
- Elevated urinary sodium (>20 mmol/L)
- Euvolaemia (no oedema, no dehydration)
- Exclude: hypothyroidism, hypoadrenalism
Management question: "First-line treatment?" → Fluid restriction (800–1000 ml/day). If severe/symptomatic → IV hypertonic saline under close monitoring. Never correct faster than 10 mmol/L in 24 hours (risk of central pontine myelinolysis).
5. JAUNDICE / LIVER
Examination question common stem: "34-year-old woman, jaundice, pruritus, raised ALP, elevated GGT, anti-mitochondrial antibodies positive."
Answer: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Mechanism: T-cell-mediated destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. Treatment: ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).
How to classify jaundice in an exam:
| Type | Bilirubin | ALP | ALT/AST | Urobilinogen | Example |
|---|
| Pre-hepatic | Unconjugated ↑ | Normal | Normal | ↑ | Haemolysis |
| Hepatic | Both ↑ | ↑ | ↑↑ | Variable | Hepatitis, cirrhosis |
| Post-hepatic | Conjugated ↑ | ↑↑ | Mild ↑ | Absent | Gallstones, cholangiocarcinoma |
════════════════════════════════════════
PART 3: MASTER RULES FOR SCORING WELL
════════════════════════════════════════
The Examiner's Mindset
Examiners mark against a pre-set marking scheme. They cannot give marks for content not on the scheme, no matter how intelligent your answer sounds. Your goal is to predict the marking scheme and write to it.
The 10 Rules That Consistently Separate High Scorers
| Rule | Detail |
|---|
| 1. Structure before content | A structured incomplete answer scores more than an unstructured complete one |
| 2. Worst first | Always mention and exclude the most dangerous diagnosis first |
| 3. Named drugs, not drug classes | "Bisoprolol" beats "a beta-blocker" — shows you know the specific agent |
| 4. Doses and routes matter | "IV ceftriaxone 2g" vs. "give antibiotics" — the first scores marks |
| 5. Match answer depth to marks | Count the marks. Write that many distinct points. No more, no less |
| 6. Relevant negatives | "No fever" or "no focal neurology" — negatives narrow your differential and show clinical thinking |
| 7. Use the ABCDE framework | For any acute/management question, default to ABCDE before specific treatment |
| 8. Know your investigations hierarchy | Bedside → blood tests → imaging → specialist — in that order |
| 9. Evidence and trials in SAQs | Mention key trials where relevant (RALES, ACCORD, SPRINT) — earns distinction-level marks |
| 10. Do not waffle | Every sentence that doesn't contain a markable fact is wasted time |
Common Mistakes That Drop Marks
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|
| Writing "do bloods" | Write exactly: "FBC, U&E, LFTs, coagulation, CRP, blood cultures" |
| "Give fluids" | Write: "IV 0.9% sodium chloride 500ml bolus over 15 minutes, reassess" |
| Starting management without stabilising | Always: resuscitate → diagnose → treat |
| Ignoring the time course | "3-month history" = chronic; "2-hour history" = acute — your investigations and management differ |
| Listing causes without a structure | Always use a sieve: surgical sieve / system-based / pre/intra/post classification |
| Missing the demographic clue | Young woman with arthritis + rash = SLE; elderly man with prostate symptoms + haematuria = malignancy until proven otherwise |
Quick Reference: What to Write First for Each Question Type
| Question Type | First Thing to Write |
|---|
| "What is the diagnosis?" | State the diagnosis in one sentence. Then list the supporting features |
| "What investigations?" | Bedside first, then blood tests, then imaging |
| "What is the management?" | ABCDE → resuscitation → specific treatment → definitive |
| "List causes of X" | Start with the most common / most dangerous |
| "Interpret this investigation" | State the abnormality → state what it means → give clinical context |
| "What complications?" | Use temporal (immediate/early/late) OR system-based classification |
Internal medicine rewards the student who thinks out loud on paper — showing the examiner not just what they know, but how they think through a clinical problem. Every answer should demonstrate: "I can see this patient, I know what matters, and I know what to do next."