Aha guidlines for CPCR in details take a reference from standard text books of anaesthesia
AHA 2020 2024 guidelines CPR CPCR cardiopulmonary resuscitation key updates
AHA adult cardiac arrest algorithm CPR ACLS 2020

A clinical photograph demonstrating the application of a LUCAS 3 mechanical chest compression system on an adult male in a supine position. The image serves as a procedural demonstration of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ACD-CPR). The device is positioned centrally over the sternum, featuring a white support arch that spans the torso and is secured with black stabilization straps. The grey upper housing contains the motor and control interface, while a vertical piston with a circular suction cup/pad is visible in contact with the lower third of the sternum to deliver consistent, high-quality chest compressions. The patient is bare-chested to show proper anatomical placement of the device between the axillary lines. This image is used for training medical professionals in emergency medicine and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) to illustrate mechanical adjuncts that reduce provider fatigue and maintain perfusion during cardiac arrest.

This clinical photograph captures a male patient undergoing Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) in an intensive care or transport setting, featuring the implementation of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The primary focus is the LUCAS 3 Chest Compression System, an automated device positioned over the patient's sternum. The system's upper unit is mounted on a rigid backplate via a support frame, with the suction cup plunger centered on the chest to deliver consistent compressions. Concurrent interventions include airway management via a bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation setup and a bag of intravenous fluids suspended overhead. Visible monitoring equipment includes ECG leads and adhesive pads on the patient's chest. The image illustrates the integration of automated technology in managing cardiac arrest, demonstrating the positioning of mechanical compression devices alongside manual ventilation and pharmacological access. This visual is intended for healthcare professionals to understand the practical application of automated CPR systems in critical care scenarios.

This medical illustration depicts the correct anatomical hand placement for high-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in an adult. The view is an anterior-superior perspective of the patient's torso. The rescuer's hands are shown interlocked, with the heel of one hand placed firmly on the lower half of the patient's sternum, centered between the nipples. The second hand is positioned directly on top of the first, with fingers interlaced to ensure pressure is localized to the sternum rather than the ribs. The patient is shown with an open shirt (blue collar and yellow sleeves) to emphasize the importance of exposing the chest during emergency cardiac care. Anatomical landmarks include the neck, clavicular area, and the midline of the thorax, representing the path for external chest compressions (ECC). This graphic serves as a pedagogical tool for Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) training, illustrating the initial mechanical step in the Out-of-Hospital Chain of Survival.

Table 16. PLS Topics Reviewed by EvUps <table><thead><tr><th>Topic/PICOST</th><th>Year last updated</th><th>Existing treatment recommendation</th><th>RCTs since last review, n</th><th>Observational studies since last review, n</th><th>Key findings</th><th>Sufficient data to warrant SysRev?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Pulse check accuracy</td><td>2020</td><td>The ILCOR treatment recommendations from 2020 remain unchanged: Palpation of a pulse (or its absence) is not reliable as the sole determinant of cardiac arrest and need for chest compressions. If the individual is unresponsive or not breathing normally and there are no signs of life, lay rescuers should begin CPR. In infants and children with no signs of life, health care providers should begin CPR unless they can definitely palpate a pulse within 10 s.</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>In the 2020 EvUp on the accuracy of pulse check in determining ROC after cardiac arrest in children, 2 studies were identified describing the use of manual pulse check in pediatric cardiac arrest. Our EvUp in 2022 identified several adult studies assessing the utility of manual pulse palpation at different sites and manual pulse palpation vs other innovative techniques such as the use of Doppler ultrasound, POCUS, photoplethysmography, and ECG-based pulse detection. However, no new pediatric studies were identified. Despite several recent adult studies comparing manual pulse palpation with other methods of detecting ROC after arrest, there remains very little pediatric-specific evidence in this area.</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>Pad size, type, and placement for pediatric defibrillation</td><td>2020</td><td>The ILCOR treatment recommendations remain unchanged: There is insufficient evidence to alter the current recommendations to use the largest size paddles that fit an infant's or child's chest without touching each other or to recommend one paddle or pad position or type over another. Either self-adhesive defibrillation pads or paddles may be used in infants and children in cardiac arrest.</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>In the 2020 EvUp on the use of various pad sizes, types, and placement for pediatric defibrillation, 1 new pediatric study was identified since 2010 examining the use of different defibrillator pad positions in children with shockable rhythms in cardiac arrest. Our EvUp in 2022 did not find any new pediatric studies on the topics of defibrillator pad size, type, or placement in pediatric cardiac arrest. There are few pediatric-specific studies on the topics of defibrillator pad size, type, or placement in pediatric cardiac arrest.</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>Antiarrhythmics for children in cardiac arrest with shockable rhythms at any time during CPR or immediately after ROSC</td><td>2018</td><td>We suggest that amiodarone or lidocaine may be used for the treatment of pediatric shock-resistant VF/pVT (weak recommendation, very low–quality evidence).</td><td>0</td><td>1</td><td>The only new evidence since the last SysRev in 2018 is an observational study using the GWTG database that found no significant difference in outcomes when propensity-matched scores were used to compare children who received lidocaine and children who received amiodarone for shockable rhythm during cardiac arrest. A SysRev was also reported in a brief research letter with limited description of methods.</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><td>Adenosine use in SVT</td><td>2020</td><td>This treatment recommendation is unchanged from 2010. For infants and children with SVT with a palpable pulse, adenosine should be considered the preferred medication. Verapamil may be considered an alternative therapy in older children, but it should not be routinely used in infants. Procainamide or amiodarone given by a slow intravenous infusion with careful hemodynamic monitoring may be considered for refractory SVT. Moderate-quality evidence shows no differences in effects of adenosine and calcium channel antagonists for treatment of SVT reverting to sinus rhythm, and low-quality evidence suggests no appreciable differences in the incidence of hypotension. A study comparing patient experiences and prospectively studied adverse events would provide evidence on which treatment is preferable for management of SVT.</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>There have not been any new studies on the use of adenosine in SVT since our last review. For infants and children with SVT with a palpable pulse, adenosine should be considered the preferred medication. Verapamil may be considered an alternative therapy in older children, but it should not be routinely used in infants. Procainamide or amiodarone given by a slow intravenous infusion with careful hemodynamic monitoring may be considered for refractory SVT. Moderate-quality evidence shows no differences in effects of adenosine and calcium channel antagonists for treatment of SVT reverting to sinus rhythm, and low-quality evidence suggests no appreciable differences in the incidence of hypotension. A study comparing patient experiences and prospectively studied adverse events would provide evidence on which treatment is preferable for management of SVT.</td><td>No</td></tr></tbody></table>
| Parameter | Target |
|---|---|
| Rate | 100-120/min |
| Depth (adults) | ≥5 cm (2 inches); not >6 cm |
| Chest recoil | Complete (hands off chest between compressions) |
| Interruptions | Minimize; pre-shock pause <10 seconds |
| Compression fraction | >60% |



| Device | Energy |
|---|---|
| Biphasic (truncated exponential) | 150-200 J |
| Biphasic (rectilinear) | 120 J |
| Biphasic (unknown type) | 200 J |
| Monophasic | 360 J |
| Second/subsequent biphasic | Same or higher dose |
| AEDs | Energy pre-selected |
| Drug | First Dose | Second Dose |
|---|---|---|
| Amiodarone | 300 mg IV/IO bolus | 150 mg |
| Lidocaine | 1-1.5 mg/kg IV/IO | 0.5-0.75 mg/kg |
| H's | T's |
|---|---|
| Hypovolemia | Tension pneumothorax |
| Hypoxia | Tamponade (cardiac) |
| Hydrogen ion (acidosis) | Toxins |
| Hypo-/Hyperkalemia | Thrombosis (pulmonary embolism) |
| Hypothermia | Thrombosis (coronary) |
| Parameter | Target |
|---|---|
| Compression rate | 100-120/min |
| Compression depth | ≥5 cm |
| Complete recoil | Yes |
| PETCO2 | >10 mmHg; ideally >20 mmHg at 5-10 min post-intubation |
| Coronary perfusion pressure | >15-20 mmHg |
| Component | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Compression rate | 100-120/min |
| Depth (adult) | ≥5 cm, ≤6 cm |
| Compression:ventilation | 30:2 (no advanced airway); 10 breaths/min (with advanced airway) |
| Tidal volume | 500-600 mL |
| Oxygen (during CPR) | 100% FiO2 |
| Pulse check time | <10 seconds |
| Pre-shock pause | <10 seconds |
| Defibrillation (biphasic) | 120-200 J |
| Epinephrine | 1 mg IV/IO q3-5 min |
| Amiodarone (1st dose) | 300 mg IV/IO bolus |
| Lidocaine (1st dose) | 1-1.5 mg/kg IV/IO |
| Compressor change | Every 2 minutes |