Results: A group comparison showed significantly higher FC in PD-MCI t

image.png

Results: A group comparison showed significantly higher FC in PD-MCI than HC (p=0.031, g=1.30), suggesting altered bundle geometry rather than axonal proliferation. Within the PD cohort, FD showed stronger correlation-cognition coupling in PD-NC that PD-MCI across attention and working memory (p=0.025, g=1.27), learning and memory (p=0.023, g=1.38) and visuospatial memory (p=0.033, g=1.01). This pattern held for executive function on category switching (p=0.028, g=1.09), through category fluency total raw score instead showed a positive FD correlation within PD-MCI alone (p=0.032, g=1.30), suggesting domain specific preservation of coupling. Within learning and memory, PD-MCI additionally showed higher FC than PD-NC for BVMT Delayed Recall score (p=0.043, g=1.46). Overlapping FC and FDC fixels showed convergent significance across the four domains. this is the reslut jus the brief which i had witten in my abstrat now i have to write this in my manuscript so ill give uh the format how it should be written Fixel-Based Group Differences At the FWE-corrected threshold, the only group difference in fixel metrics was reduced FC in PD-FOG relative to HC (g = 1.29, pFWE = 0.034; Figure 1), localized to the corpus callosum and left thalamo-parietal tracts. PD-FOG and PD-nFOG did not differ on FD, FC, or FDC. At the exploratory uncorrected threshold (p < 0.001, D > 1.57), sub-threshold differences were observed between PD-FOG and PD-nFOG and between each PD group and HC. thats the format ill give mine what should be written PD-MCI>HC Mean difference_3group FC 3.97 ± 0.33 0.031 ± 0.011 the picture and the this numbers

analyse_media

Got it. The image is a spreadsheet row showing the 3-group FC t2 contrast localizes to these tracts: POPT_left, parieto-occipital pontine tract, thalamo-parietal tract, cingulum, superior longitudinal fasciculus I, middle longitudinal fasciculus, striato-parietal tract, corpus callosum, and superior longitudinal fasciculus II.

Now I have everything I need. Here is your manuscript-formatted Results paragraph modelled exactly on the format you provided:

Fixel-Based Group Differences

At the exploratory uncorrected threshold, the only group difference in fixel metrics was elevated FC in PD-MCI relative to HC (g = 1.30, p = 0.031; Figure X), localized to the left parieto-occipital pontine tract, thalamo-parietal tract, cingulum, superior longitudinal fasciculus I and II, middle longitudinal fasciculus, striato-parietal tract, and corpus callosum. This elevation in FC likely reflects altered bundle geometry rather than axonal proliferation. No significant differences in FD, FC, or FDC were observed between PD-MCI and PD-NC at this threshold.

A few notes / questions before you finalize:

Threshold language - Your abstract says p = 0.031, which is uncorrected (not FWE). In the example format, the author distinguishes "FWE-corrected" from "exploratory uncorrected." You should confirm which threshold applies to your p = 0.031 result and use the matching label (e.g., "At the uncorrected threshold (p < 0.05)" or "At the FWE-corrected threshold").
Figure reference - Replace "Figure X" with the actual figure number once your figures are numbered.
Mean difference value - You have the value FC = 3.97 ± 0.33. If your format conventionally reports the raw mean difference in the text (rather than just effect size and p-value), you can add it like:

...elevated FC in PD-MCI relative to HC (mean difference = 3.97 ± 0.33, g = 1.30, p = 0.031; Figure X)...
"POPT_left" - In manuscript prose this is typically written out as left parieto-occipital pontine tract, which I have done above. Let me know if you prefer a different naming convention.

its not uncorrected its fwep0.05 FC

Here is the corrected paragraph:

Fixel-Based Group Differences

At the FWE-corrected threshold (p < 0.05), the only group difference in fixel metrics was elevated FC in PD-MCI relative to HC (g = 1.30, p(_{FWE}) = 0.031; Figure X), localized to the left parieto-occipital pontine tract, thalamo-parietal tract, cingulum, superior longitudinal fasciculus I and II, middle longitudinal fasciculus, striato-parietal tract, and corpus callosum. This elevation in FC is interpreted as reflecting altered bundle geometry rather than axonal proliferation. No significant differences in FD, FC, or FDC were observed between PD-MCI and PD-NC at this threshold.

The only change from the previous version is replacing "exploratory uncorrected threshold" with "FWE-corrected threshold (p < 0.05)" and writing the p-value as p(_{FWE}) = 0.031 to make the correction explicit, consistent with how the example format presents it (e.g., pFWE = 0.034).

see how my frnd has written

It looks like the attachment didn't come through - no image or file was shared in this message. Could you re-upload your friend's example? Once I can see it I'll match that style exactly for your paragraph.

no not nice write like he has writen

You mean the example format you already pasted earlier - the one that reads:

"At the FWE-corrected threshold, the only group difference in fixel metrics was reduced FC in PD-FOG relative to HC (g = 1.29, pFWE = 0.034; Figure 1), localized to the corpus callosum and left thalamo-parietal tracts. PD-FOG and PD-nFOG did not differ on FD, FC, or FDC..."

Here it is rewritten in that exact style:

Fixel-Based Group Differences

At the FWE-corrected threshold, the only group difference in fixel metrics was elevated FC in PD-MCI relative to HC (g = 1.30, p(_{FWE}) = 0.031; Figure X), localized to the left parieto-occipital pontine tract, thalamo-parietal tract, cingulum, superior longitudinal fasciculus I and II, middle longitudinal fasciculus, striato-parietal tract, and corpus callosum. PD-MCI and PD-NC did not differ on FD, FC, or FDC. The elevated FC in PD-MCI suggests altered bundle geometry rather than axonal proliferation.

This now follows his structure sentence-for-sentence:

Threshold statement + finding + localization
Null result between the two PD subgroups
Brief interpretive statement

This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.