TENS NAIL for ulnar fractures
TENS nail ulnar fracture fixation pediatric
titanium elastic nail forearm fracture children
TENS nail ulnar fracture surgical technique pediatric outcomes
https://surgeryreference.aofoundation.org/orthopedic-trauma/…
| Parameter | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Nail diameter | 60-70% of the medullary canal diameter at the isthmus |
| Common sizes | 1.5 mm, 2 mm, 2.5 mm, 3 mm |
| Nail length (ulna) | Distance from olecranon to ulnar styloid minus 1 cm |
| Number of nails | Usually 1 nail per bone in the forearm |
Alternatively, the ulna can also be nailed retrograde (distal to proximal), entering just proximal to the distal ulnar physis. The antegrade approach is preferred for most shaft fractures.
⚠️ Do not use a hammer if the nail is stuck (especially in young children with narrow canals) - withdraw 2 cm, rotate to free the tip, then re-advance.
| Study | n | Union Rate | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jain et al. (2023) | 65 | High | Mean union 10.4 weeks; 83.3% both bones nailed |
| Bhat et al. (2022) | 30 | 100% | Excellent/good outcome in all patients |
| PMC review (2016) | 50 | ~100% | Excellent in 92%, good in 8% |
| Guzel (2023) | Retrospective | - | TENS comparable to other fixation methods |
| Complication | Notes |
|---|---|
| Nail back-out / migration | Most common; prevented by correct nail length and end caps |
| Skin irritation at entry site | ~25% in some series; managed by nail trimming |
| Superficial infection | ~6% at entry sites; mostly minor |
| Re-fracture | Especially if nail removed too early |
| Ulnar nerve injury | Risk at proximal entry point creation |
| Malunion / loss of reduction | More common in older children (>10 yrs), proximal fractures |
| Refracture after nail removal | Avoid removing before complete remodeling |
| Iatrogenic fracture | From forcing a stuck nail; always withdraw and rotate first |
Medial malleolus plating
medial malleolus fracture plate fixation screws
medial malleolus plating indications technique hook plate anti-glide
| Method | Best For |
|---|---|
| Lag screws (1 or 2) | Standard transverse / oblique fragments with good bone stock |
| Tension band wiring (TBW) | Small fragments, osteoporotic bone, transverse geometry |
| Plate fixation | Vertical shear (SAD) fractures, comminuted/small fragments, poor bone quality |
| Study | Finding |
|---|---|
| Wegner et al. | Anti-glide plating - stiffest initial fixation and highest load to failure vs. unicortical and bicortical screw fixation alone |
| Dumigan et al. | Two 3.5 mm parallel fully threaded cortical screws parallel to plafond - stiffest under transverse loading; plate with 2 screws on both sides of fracture - stiffest under offset axial loading |
| Toolan et al. (cadaveric) | Lag screws perpendicular to osteotomy were significantly stronger than antiglide plate alone |
| Complication | Notes |
|---|---|
| Symptomatic hardware | Most common; higher with TBW (~7%); often requires removal |
| Nonunion | Rare with rigid fixation; more common with K-wires alone or early implant failure |
| Intra-articular screw penetration | Avoided by correct fluoroscopic view (true AP, not mortise) |
| Saphenous nerve/vein injury | Blunt dissection, anterior to malleolus |
| Posterior tibial tendon injury | From posterior colliculus screw misdirection |
| Plafond impaction missed | Must inspect and address impacted articular surface before fixation in SAD fractures |
Fragment size / bone quality assessment
|
Large fragment + good bone → 1 or 2 lag screws (cancellous/cortical)
|
Small fragment → Hook plate or TBW
|
Vertical fracture line (SAD) → Anti-glide / buttress plate ± parallel screws
|
Comminuted / osteoporotic → Hook plate or TBW (± washers)
|
Failed screw purchase → Convert to plate