I now have comprehensive content. Here is the complete triage reference note:
Triage Systems for the Emergency Physician - Complete Reference
Triage derives from the French "trier" (to sort). The goal differs fundamentally between routine ED triage (identify the sickest individual) and disaster/MCI triage (do the most good for the most people).
PART 1: ED (ROUTINE) TRIAGE SYSTEMS
Five major 5-level systems are used worldwide. 5-level systems are superior to 3-level systems in both validity and reliability.
1. Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 🇺🇸
Used in: United States (most widely used), many international EDs
Basis: Acuity + anticipated resource utilization
Levels: 5
| Level | Category | Color | Criteria | Target Time to Physician |
|---|
| 1 | Resuscitation | Red | Requires immediate life-saving intervention (intubation, defibrillation, CPR) | Immediate |
| 2 | Emergent | Orange | High-risk situation; lethargic/disoriented; severe pain/distress; dangerous vital signs | <15 min |
| 3 | Urgent | Yellow | Stable vitals but needs multiple resources (labs + imaging + IV) | <30 min |
| 4 | Less Urgent | Green | Needs one resource only (one lab OR one X-ray) | <60 min |
| 5 | Non-Urgent | Blue | Needs no resources - history + exam only | <120 min |
ESI Decision Algorithm:
Step 1: Does the patient need IMMEDIATE life-saving intervention? → Level 1
Step 2: Is this a HIGH-RISK situation / confused / severe distress? → Level 2
Step 3: How many RESOURCES will this patient need?
≥2 resources → Level 3 (also check vital signs - abnormals bump to Level 2)
1 resource → Level 4
0 resources → Level 5
Vital sign thresholds that bump Level 3 → Level 2:
- HR >100 or <50 | RR >20 | SpO₂ <92% | Temperature >38.5°C | Altered mentation
Pros: Simple, resource-based, widely validated, used for all ages (with pediatric modification)
Cons: "Resources" subjective; poor inter-rater reliability across countries
2. Manchester Triage System (MTS) 🇬🇧
Used in: UK, Europe, Netherlands, Brazil
Basis: Presenting complaint → flowchart → discriminators
Levels: 5
| Level | Category | Color | Target Time |
|---|
| 1 | Immediate | Red | Immediate (0 min) |
| 2 | Very Urgent | Orange | 10 minutes |
| 3 | Urgent | Yellow | 60 minutes |
| 4 | Standard | Green | 120 minutes |
| 5 | Non-Urgent | Blue | 240 minutes |
How it works:
- Select the presenting complaint flowchart (52 flowcharts e.g., chest pain, headache, breathing difficulty)
- Work through discriminators in priority order (e.g., airway compromise → shock → extreme pain)
- Assign level based on the first positive discriminator encountered
Key discriminators: Life threat, airway compromise, haemodynamic abnormality, level of consciousness, temperature, pain score
Pros: Structured, symptom-specific, systematic flowcharts, widely used in Europe
Cons: Slower (~3-5 min per patient); less sensitive in elderly with atypical presentations; limited sensitivity for frail patients (2025 PLOS ONE study)
3. Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) 🇨🇦
Used in: Canada, some Asian and Middle Eastern countries
Basis: Chief complaint + modifiers + vital signs
Levels: 5
| Level | Category | Color | Target Time to Physician | Reassessment |
|---|
| 1 | Resuscitation | Blue/Red | Immediate | Continuous |
| 2 | Emergent | Red/Orange | 15 minutes | Every 15 min |
| 3 | Urgent | Yellow | 30 minutes | Every 30 min |
| 4 | Less Urgent | Green | 60 minutes | Every 60 min |
| 5 | Non-Urgent | White | 120 minutes | Every 120 min |
Unique features:
- Only system with mandatory reassessment intervals at each level
- Uses modifiers: first-order (chief complaint-based) and second-order (pain, mechanism of injury)
- Pediatric version: PaedsCTAS (accounts for age-adjusted vitals, pediatric-specific presentations)
- Highest reliability among all systems (κ = 0.7-0.95)
Pros: Very reliable, reassessment built in, robust pediatric version, well-validated
Cons: Complex, takes 5-10 minutes to complete properly; requires training
4. Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) 🇦🇺
Used in: Australia, New Zealand
Basis: Clinical urgency - time to treatment
Levels: 5
| Level | Category | Color | Max Time to Treatment | Duration of Assessment |
|---|
| 1 | Immediately Life-Threatening | Red | Immediate | Continuous |
| 2 | Imminently Life-Threatening | Orange | 10 minutes | Every 10 min |
| 3 | Potentially Life-Threatening | Yellow | 30 minutes | Every 30 min |
| 4 | Potentially Serious | Green | 60 minutes | Every 60 min |
| 5 | Less Urgent | Blue | 120 minutes | Every 120 min |
Unique features:
- Specifies initial assessment time (not just time to physician)
- Explicitly states duration of each assessment
- Includes mental health and social triage criteria
Pros: Time-based, clear, established nationally
Cons: Moderate reliability (κ = 0.3-0.6); less resource-oriented
5. South African Triage Scale (SATS) 🇿🇦
Used in: South Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, resource-limited settings
Basis: Triage Early Warning Score (TEWS) + presenting complaint discriminators
Levels: 5
| Level | Category | Color | Action |
|---|
| 1 | Emergency | Red | Immediate |
| 2 | Very Urgent | Orange | Within 10 min |
| 3 | Urgent | Yellow | Within 1 hour |
| 4 | Routine | Green | Within 4 hours |
| 5 | Not Urgent | Blue | Within 8 hours |
TEWS scoring: Walking ability + respiratory rate + oxygen saturation + temperature + heart rate + systolic BP + AVPU
Unique: Designed for resource-limited settings; incorporates mobility assessment as a key first step
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON TABLE
| Feature | ESI | MTS | CTAS | ATS | SATS |
|---|
| Origin | USA | UK | Canada | Australia | South Africa |
| Basis | Acuity + resources | Symptom flowcharts | Complaint + modifiers | Clinical urgency | TEWS + complaint |
| Levels | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Time to complete | 1-2 min | 3-5 min | 5-10 min | 2-3 min | 2-3 min |
| Mandatory reassessment | No | No | Yes | No | No |
| Pediatric version | Yes (ESI-Peds) | Yes (PaedsMTS) | Yes (PaedsCTAS) | Yes | Yes |
| Reliability (κ) | 0.7-0.9 | 0.3-0.6 | 0.7-0.95 | 0.3-0.6 | 0.7 |
| Best for | US EDs, resource prediction | European EDs, symptom-driven | High-reliability, training | Australian setting | Low-resource settings |
| Weakness | Resources subjective | Slow, poor for elderly/atypical | Complex, time-consuming | Moderate reliability | Limited international validation |
No single triage system has proven clearly superior to the others - selection depends on setting, training, and local validation.
PART 2: MASS CASUALTY INCIDENT (MCI) TRIAGE SYSTEMS
Goal shifts from individual care to utilitarian: greatest good for greatest number.
MCI defined as ≥5 patients overwhelming local resources.
Universal MCI Triage Color Categories
| Color | Category | Meaning |
|---|
| 🔴 Red | Immediate | Life-threatening; needs treatment NOW to survive |
| 🟡 Yellow | Delayed | Serious but stable; can wait |
| 🟢 Green | Minimal/Minor | "Walking wounded"; minor injuries |
| ⚫ Black | Expectant/Dead | Injuries incompatible with survival given resources; or no signs of life |
| ⚫ Gray | Expectant (SALT only) | Expected to die despite maximal intervention |
1. START (Simple Triage And Rapid Treatment) 🇺🇸
Used: Prehospital/field triage, adults
Speed: 30-60 seconds per patient
Assessment: RPM - Respirations, Perfusion, Mental status
Algorithm:
Can the patient WALK?
YES → GREEN (minimal/walking wounded)
NO ↓
Is patient BREATHING?
NO → Open airway → still not breathing? → BLACK (deceased)
Breathing after opening? → RED (immediate)
YES ↓
Respiratory rate?
>30/min → RED (immediate)
<10/min → RED (immediate)
10-29/min ↓
Perfusion: Radial pulse or capillary refill >2 sec?
No pulse / CRT >2 sec → RED (immediate) + hemorrhage control
Pulse present / CRT ≤2 sec ↓
Mental status: Can follow simple commands?
NO → RED (immediate)
YES → YELLOW (delayed)
Key rule: During START, only two interventions allowed:
- Open airway (head-tilt/chin-lift)
- Direct pressure on obvious external hemorrhage
Pros: Fast, simple, validated in real MCI (2002 Placentia Linda train crash - 100% sensitivity for RED category)
Cons: Requires capillary refill or respiratory rate (may be inaccurate in field); some overtriage
2. SALT (Sort, Assess, Lifesaving interventions, Treatment/Transport) 🇺🇸
Used: US national standard (CDC-recommended), prehospital + hospital
Developed: 2011 by multidisciplinary consensus (Model Uniform Core Criteria)
Two-phase approach:
Phase 1 - SORT (global):
"If you can hear me and can walk, move to [safe area]" → GREEN
Assess remaining in priority: Still > Waving > Those who walked but couldn't relocate
Phase 2 - ASSESS (individual, one-by-one):
| Assessment | Finding | Category |
|---|
| No signs of life | No breathing, no pulse | BLACK (dead) |
| Signs of life present | → Perform brief lifesaving interventions if possible (control hemorrhage, open airway, give antidote) | ↓ |
| After interventions: Likely to survive? | Cannot follow commands + no peripheral pulse + poor breathing | GRAY (expectant) |
| Obeys commands OR has peripheral pulse OR normal breathing | → | RED (immediate) |
| Significant injury, not immediate | Can wait | YELLOW (delayed) |
| Minor / no injury | Ambulatory | GREEN (minimal) |
Key difference from START: SALT adds GRAY category (expectant - will likely die) separate from BLACK (already dead) - eliminates ambiguity about dying but not yet dead patients
Pros: More precise categorization, all-hazards approach (trauma/medical/chemical/radiological), reduces undertriage by 9% vs START
Cons: Slightly more complex; less studied in real disasters than START
Rosen's Emergency Medicine recommends START until more evidence on SALT accumulates.
3. JumpSTART (Pediatric MCI Triage)
Used: Children in MCI settings
Modification of START with pediatric-specific criteria:
| Step | START (Adults) | JumpSTART (Children) |
|---|
| Apneic patient | → BLACK | → Attempt 5 rescue breaths first → if still apneic → BLACK |
| Resp rate normal | 10-29/min | 15-45/min |
| Mental status | Follow commands | AVPU scale (Alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive) |
4. CareFlight Triage
Used: Australia, some prehospital systems
Steps: Walk → Obeys commands → Pulse → Respiratory effort
- Performed best overall across all ages in multi-tool evaluation
- Simpler than JumpSTART for pediatric victims
5. RAMP (Rapid Assessment of Mentation and Pulse)
Used: Emerging system, military and tactical medicine
Basis: Mental status + pulse only
- Faster than START (assesses only 2 parameters)
- Results largely similar to START in final categorization
- Suitable when time is extremely limited
PART 3: SPECIAL SITUATIONS IN TRIAGE
CBRN / Hazmat Triage
- Decontamination BEFORE standard triage
- Antidote administration (e.g., atropine for organophosphate) is a lifesaving intervention during SALT
- PPE for triage personnel mandatory
Pediatric Considerations (Routine ED)
- All major ED systems have pediatric versions (ESI, CTAS, MTS, ATS)
- No single pediatric ED triage system proven superior
- Pediatric Triage Tape (PTT): Length-based criteria for infants/toddlers in MCI settings
Geriatric Triage
- Both ESI and MTS show limited sensitivity in elderly patients with atypical presentations (PLOS ONE, 2025)
- ESI performs better than MTS for discriminating urgency in older adults
- Current consensus: triage systems need revision to account for age-related vulnerability and non-specific presentations
QUICK REFERENCE SUMMARY
ROUTINE ED TRIAGE (most to least reliable):
CTAS > ESI > MTS > ATS > SATS
MCI/DISASTER TRIAGE:
Adults: START (most validated) or SALT (US national standard)
Children: JumpSTART (pediatric modification of START)
KEY PRINCIPLE DIFFERENCES:
ED triage = save the sickest INDIVIDUAL
MCI triage = save the MOST people with available resources
Sources: Rosen's Emergency Medicine (10th ed.) | Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine | HSTCSA Performance Review (2024) | PLOS ONE Geriatric Triage Study (2025) | WikEM MCI Triage | CDC SALT Guidelines