attachment
attachment

Daignosis

analyse_media
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"cerebral cavernous malformation" AND MRI

Searching the Web

cerebral cavernous malformation MRI GRE popcorn appearance diagnosis adolescent

What the Image Shows

This is a screen capture of a brain MRI viewer (patient "LOKESH," 17-year-old male, MRN 617094) displaying three planes - axial (top left), sagittal (top right), and coronal (bottom left) - all using a GRE (gradient-echo) sequence (labeled "gre_fsp," TR 16.94/TE 7.6, TI 1130), which is a susceptibility-sensitive sequence specifically used to detect blood breakdown products.
All three planes show the same well-circumscribed, rounded lesion in the right hemisphere (measured region of interest ~600-930 mm² across planes), with a heterogeneous, mixed-signal-intensity core - some areas hyperintense, some markedly hypointense - localized near the right temporal region/sylvian fissure area based on the coronal and sagittal views.

Most Likely Diagnosis

This appearance is classic for a cerebral cavernous malformation (cavernoma / cavernous angioma):
  • A rounded, "popcorn ball"-like lesion with a heterogeneous core (mixed blood products of different ages) surrounded by a hypointense rim of hemosiderin
  • This is most conspicuous on GRE/susceptibility-weighted sequences, which show a "blooming" signal-loss artifact from hemosiderin/calcium - exactly the sequence used here - Grainger & Allison's Diagnostic Radiology, and Bradley and Daroff's Neurology in Clinical Practice both describe this appearance as diagnostic
  • Cavernomas are usually solitary but can be multiple (familial CCM); they're often found incidentally or present with seizures, headache, or focal neurologic deficit from a small bleed - which fits a 17-year-old being scanned

Differential Diagnoses to Consider

Since a single photo of a monitor can't replace a full radiologic read, other possibilities that can mimic this GRE appearance include:
  • Hemorrhagic tumor (e.g., a low-grade glioma with old hemorrhage, or rarely a hemorrhagic metastasis)
  • Calcified lesion (e.g., calcifying tumor, old granuloma such as neurocysticercosis - though these tend to be smaller and more uniform than the mixed "popcorn" pattern seen here)
  • Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) with associated hemorrhage
  • Developmental venous anomaly with an associated cavernoma

Important Caveats

  • This assessment is based only on a photograph of a workstation screen, not the actual DICOM images, so subtle signal characteristics, contrast enhancement pattern, and comparison with T1/T2/FLAIR/SWI sequences (which a radiologist would review together) cannot be fully assessed.
  • A definitive diagnosis requires correlation with the full MRI series (including contrast-enhanced sequences), clinical history (seizures, headache, focal deficits, family history), and formal radiologist/neurosurgeon interpretation.
  • Recent literature (2023 systematic review, PMID 36889633) also notes that giant cavernomas can occasionally mimic infiltrative tumors in children/adolescents, reinforcing that tissue or multi-sequence confirmation matters before treatment decisions are made.
Recommendation: This patient should be evaluated by a neurologist/neurosurgeon with the complete MRI study (all sequences) for definitive characterization, and further workup (e.g., susceptibility-weighted imaging, contrast series, possibly screening for familial CCM if there is a relevant family history) as clinically indicated.
attachment
attachment

Daignosis

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

unilateral pulmonary infiltrate chest radiograph differential diagnosis

Searching the Web

unilateral left lung reticular opacity chest xray causes differential

What the Image Shows

This is an AP frontal chest X-ray displayed on a workstation monitor (patient thumbnail labeled "HIROESH KUMA...", right-side marker "R" visible). Key findings:
  • Right lung field: relatively normal in aeration and transparency, with visible ribs and vascular markings, no obvious focal opacity
  • Left lung field: shows diffuse, coarse reticular/streaky increased opacity spread through the mid and lower zones, making the left hemithorax noticeably hazier and denser than the right
  • Bony structures (clavicles, ribs, both humeral heads/shoulders) appear symmetric, and the mediastinum/trachea does not show gross shift, though this is difficult to fully assess from a photograph of a screen rather than the raw DICOM
This is an asymmetric, left-sided reticular opacity pattern - abnormal lung findings confined mostly to one side.

Differential Diagnosis

A unilateral, coarse reticular/interstitial opacity like this raises several possibilities, roughly in order of how commonly they present this way:
  1. Left-sided pneumonia (bacterial, viral, or atypical/Mycoplasma) - infection can produce an interstitial or reticular pattern, especially in early or resolving stages, per Harrison's description of "reticulonodular infiltrates" seen in atypical pneumonias
  2. Pulmonary tuberculosis - classically upper-zone but can show reticulonodular infiltrates unilaterally, especially reactivation TB
  3. Chronic fibrotic change / old scarring - post-infectious fibrosis, prior TB, or localized interstitial fibrosis can produce a persistent coarse reticular pattern confined to one lung
  4. Asymmetric pulmonary edema - although pulmonary edema is usually bilateral, cardiac causes (e.g., eccentric mitral regurgitation jet directed into one upper pulmonary vein) or positional/gravitational effects can cause markedly asymmetric edema - Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine notes this specific mechanism
  5. Lymphangitic spread of tumor or sarcoidosis - can be asymmetric though usually more bilateral/hilar
  6. Less likely but worth excluding clinically: bronchiectasis, aspiration, or a resolving/organizing effusion with underlying atelectasis

Important Caveats

  • This is a photograph of a monitor, not the raw film - exposure, contrast, and fine detail (e.g., costophrenic angle sharpness, hilar structures, cardiac silhouette borders) can't be fully evaluated this way.
  • No clinical history is available (age, sex, symptoms like fever/cough/hemoptysis, duration of symptoms, prior TB or cardiac disease) - this is essential to narrow the differential meaningfully. Acute presentation favors infection/edema; chronic/incidental favors fibrosis or old TB.
  • A lateral chest film, clinical correlation, and likely a CT chest would be the next reasonable step to characterize this pattern (reticular vs. reticulonodular, distribution, presence of cavitation, lymphadenopathy, or effusion).
Bottom line: The most useful next step is correlating this finding with the patient's symptoms, exposure/travel/TB history, and vital signs, then obtaining a CT chest if the diagnosis remains unclear - this image alone cannot provide a definitive diagnosis and should be reviewed by the treating radiologist/physician with full clinical context.
attachment
attachment

Right side

Reading File
Looking at the "R" marker on this film: it sits on the viewer's left side of the image (near that shoulder), and by standard chest X-ray convention, the R annotation marks the patient's actual right side. Radiographs are conventionally displayed as if the patient is facing you, so the patient's right side appears on your left.

Right Lung Findings (marked "R" side)

The right lung field, on the viewer's left, is essentially unremarkable:
  • Normal aeration and lucency throughout
  • Preserved, unobstructed vascular/bronchial markings
  • No focal consolidation, no reticular opacity, no obvious effusion
  • Ribs and right shoulder girdle appear intact

Clarifying the Abnormal Side

The diffuse coarse reticular/hazy opacity I described in the previous image is on the opposite side of this "R" marker (viewer's right) - which corresponds to the patient's left lung, not the right. So to be precise:
  • Right lung (patient's actual right, marked "R"): clear, no significant abnormality
  • Left lung (patient's actual left, unmarked side): shows the diffuse reticular/interstitial opacity discussed previously
If your question is confirming that the right lung is the normal side, that's correct - the pathology (reticular opacity concerning for infection, TB, fibrosis, or asymmetric edema, as discussed) is isolated to the left lung, while the right lung shown here looks essentially clean on this single AP view.
If you intended to point out that the abnormality is actually on the right rather than the left (e.g., if the film was hung or labeled differently at acquisition, or if there's a mirrored/positioning issue), let me know and I can re ­examine - laterality markers can occasionally be misapplied at the console, so if the clinical exam (e.g., decreased breath sounds, dullness to percussion) points to a specific side, that clinical finding should take precedence over my interpretation of the marker in a photographed screen image.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.