nerve monitoring in ent
intraoperative nerve monitoring ENT surgery facial nerve recurrent laryngeal nerve 2024
facial nerve monitoring EMG intraoperative ENT surgery

Two-panel clinical photograph illustrating an intraoperative facial nerve (FN) monitoring setup. (A) Lateral view of a patient's face showing the placement of four paired subdermal needle electrodes for electromyography (EMG) recording. The electrodes are secured with white gauze and transparent tape at four anatomical sites corresponding to FN branches: 1) lower forehead (temporal branch), 2) infraorbital area (zygomatic branch), 3) superolateral upper lip (buccal branch), and 4) inferolateral lower lip (marginal mandibular branch). Connectors are color-coded (blue, red, purple, orange) for channel identification. (B) Intraoperative view of a parotid gland dissection. A black 1.0 mm ball-tip monopolar stimulating probe is positioned within the surgical field to identify the FN trunk via electrical localization. Surgical retractors are visible, exposing the deep tissue layers. This setup demonstrates the methodology for continuous neural monitoring to prevent iatrogenic nerve injury during head and neck surgery.

A multi-panel medical image illustrating intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (FNM) during parotid surgery. Panel A is a clinical photograph of the surgical field showing the identification of the facial nerve trunk (arrow) amidst soft tissue and temporo-parotid fascia. Panel C shows the same surgical field following dissection and parotid tumor resection, where the facial nerve trunk and its distal branches are more clearly visualized. Panels B and D display corresponding four-channel electromyography (EMG) monitoring screens. The channels record electrical activity from the temporal, zygomatic, buccal, and marginal mandibular branches. Waveforms and peak amplitudes (measured in µV) are shown for each branch: Panel B (F1) represents baseline signals pre-dissection, and Panel D (F2) represents signals post-dissection. This comparison is used to evaluate nerve integrity and function throughout the procedure. The interface highlights stimulus intensity (3.0 mA), event thresholds (100 µV), and real-time amplitude variations indicative of possible neuropraxia or successful nerve preservation.

This multi-panel figure demonstrates intraoperative facial nerve monitoring during vestibular schwannoma surgery. Panel A shows clinical photographs of a patient's face in the surgical position, illustrating the concurrent placement of traditional needle electrodes and a novel, flexible 'Biomask' sensor array over key facial muscles, including the occipitofrontalis, orbicularis oculi, orbicularis oris, and mentalis. Panel B is a close-up intraoperative photograph showing an electrical stimulator probe applied to the exposed facial nerve (indicated by a dashed white line). Panel C provides a quantitative comparison of stimulation current thresholds between the two monitoring systems, indicating lower thresholds for the Biomask. Panels D and E display electromyography (EMG) waveforms recorded by the Biomask. Panel D shows rhythmic, stimulation-induced EMG signals, while Panel E illustrates erratic, high-frequency waveforms typical of mechanical traction or surgical manipulation of the nerve. The figure evaluates the clinical efficacy of flexible microneedle arrays in providing real-time neurophysiological feedback during neurosurgery to prevent iatrogenic nerve injury.

A multi-panel clinical and diagnostic composite demonstrating intraoperative electromyography (EMG) monitoring during spinal and cranial nerve surgeries. (a) Clinical photograph of the lower leg showing the placement of a flexible 'biostamp' sensor on the upper left tibialis anterior muscle and conventional needle electrodes positioned distally. (b) Intraoperative view of a spinal surgical field exposing the left L5 spinal nerve, with a stimulation electrode in direct contact with the neural tissue. (c) Bar graph comparing average current thresholds (mA) between biostamp and needle electrodes for four spinal surgery patients, showing comparable performance. (d) Clinical photograph of the lateral face showing biostamp and needle electrode placement over the facial muscle for cranial nerve monitoring. (e) Intraoperative view of a cranial surgical site showing the exposed facial nerve and an associated stimulation electrode. (f) Bar graph of average current thresholds for a cranial surgery patient, illustrating statistically similar results between the wearable biostamp and traditional needle-based monitoring systems. The composite illustrates the clinical utility of thin, stretchable biosensors in specialized neurosurgical environments.
| Nerve | Surgery | Monitoring Method |
|---|---|---|
| Facial nerve (CN VII) | Parotidectomy, mastoidectomy, CPA tumor, cochlear implant | Free-run EMG + triggered EMG |
| Cochlear nerve (CN VIII) | Vestibular schwannoma, posterior fossa | ABR, DENM, electrocochleography |
| Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) | Thyroid, parathyroid surgery | Endotracheal tube EMG |
| Superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) | Thyroid surgery | ETT EMG |
| Trigeminal nerve (CN V) | CPA/Meckel's cave tumors | Masseter/temporalis EMG |
| Glossopharyngeal (CN IX), Vagus (CN X) | Jugular foramen tumors | Cricothyroid EMG, CoMEP |
| Spinal accessory (CN XI) | Neck dissection, CPA | Trapezius needle EMG |
| Hypoglossal (CN XII) | Skull base surgery | Tongue needle EMG |


| Setting | Evidence/Recommendation |
|---|---|
| CPA tumor (acoustic neuroma) surgery | Standard of care; reduces complete permanent paralysis; CMAP amplitude after resection correlates with immediate postoperative function |
| Revision mastoidectomy | Established; distorted anatomy increases risk |
| Parotidectomy (especially malignancy, revision) | Useful for nerve identification; may reduce temporary palsy even if permanent palsy rates unchanged |
| Cochlear implantation | Widely practiced |
| Congenital ear abnormalities | Established |
| Middle ear/primary mastoidectomy | Recommended; cost-effective; monitoring both primary and revision surgeries has greatest effectiveness and lowest cost (Wilson et al.) |
| Pitfall | Solution |
|---|---|
| Electrocautery artifact | Cease monitoring briefly during cautery near nerve; use bipolar cautery |
| NMB not reversed | Confirm train-of-four recovery before beginning nerve dissection |
| False-negative stimulation | Always confirm system is working at start (stimulate a known structure) |
| ETT rotation (RLN monitoring) | Reposition and confirm electrode contact before relying on signals |
| Reduced anesthesia depth | Diffuse multi-channel EMG increase = anesthesia issue, not nerve stimulation |
| Repetitive vs. non-repetitive responses | Repetitive = nerve irritability/thermal injury; non-repetitive = direct mechanical stimulation |