I now have comprehensive content from both Bailey & Love's (28th edition) and Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. Let me compile the full essay answer.
Achalasia Cardia - Essay Answer
(Based on Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th Edition and Sabiston Textbook of Surgery)
Definition
Achalasia is a primary oesophageal motility disorder characterised by failure of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS/LES) to relax and absence of peristalsis in the oesophageal body. The term originates from the Greek word khalasis, meaning "failure to relax."
Epidemiology
- Incidence: approximately 1 per 100,000 persons per year (Sabiston); prevalence 1.8-12.6 per 100,000 (Bailey)
- Occurs with equal frequency in males and females, and across racial groups
- Most commonly diagnosed between 30 and 60 years of age, with peaks at ~30 and ~60 years
- Prevalence appears to be increasing, likely due to improved diagnostic awareness
Aetiology and Pathophysiology
Bailey & Love: The aetiology remains uncertain. It is postulated to be due to loss of the inhibitory ganglion cells in the myenteric (Auerbach's) plexus, possibly from a virus-induced autoimmune effect. Histology shows a reduction in ganglion cells with variable chronic inflammation.
Sabiston: The pathophysiology involves selective degeneration of inhibitory neurons of the oesophageal myenteric plexus, which contain nitric oxide and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) - both needed for:
- Peristalsis of smooth muscle of the oesophageal body
- Relaxation of the LES
Notably, the excitatory neurons containing acetylcholine are spared, resulting in a hypertensive, non-relaxing LES.
Cascade of events:
- Mismatch in excitatory and inhibitory activity → failure of LOS relaxation + absent peristalsis
- Oesophagus dilates progressively; contractions disappear
- Oesophagus empties mainly by hydrostatic pressure of its contents (incomplete emptying)
- The air-fluid level in the stomach (seen in normal erect X-rays) is absent - no bolus with air passes through the LOS
- Progressive tortuous dilation = megaoesophagus
- Persistent retention oesophagitis from food fermentation → increased risk of oesophageal carcinoma
Secondary / Associated Forms
| Form | Cause |
|---|
| Chagas disease | Trypanosoma cruzi infection - destroys myenteric plexus; also affects heart, brain, GI tract |
| Pseudoachalasia | Malignancy (cancer of gastric cardia/distal oesophagus) - must be excluded, especially in patients >60 yrs with short symptom duration and significant weight loss |
| Allgrove Syndrome (Triple A) | Genetic - achalasia + alacrima + adrenal insufficiency |
Clinical Features
Symptoms (Sabiston - prevalence):
- Dysphagia for both solids AND liquids - ~95% of patients (most common symptom)
- Regurgitation of undigested food - ~70% (can cause aspiration, cough, hoarseness, pneumonia)
- Heartburn - 40-50% (NOT from gastric reflux; caused by stasis and fermentation of food)
- Chest pain - 40-50% (secondary to oesophageal distention)
- Weight loss - variable; some patients adapt diet
- Aspiration pneumonia, halitosis, regurgitation of previously eaten food
Important clinical pitfall (Sabiston): Heartburn in achalasia is often misdiagnosed as GERD, leading to acid-reducing therapy and delay in diagnosis - patients may even be wrongly referred for antireflux surgery.
Bailey: Patients often present late, having had mild chronic symptoms for years. Aspiration-related respiratory symptoms and pneumonia may occur with significant food stasis.
Eckardt Score
Used to assess severity and monitor treatment response:
| Score | Weight Loss (kg) | Dysphagia | Retrosternal Pain | Regurgitation |
|---|
| 0 | None | None | None | None |
| 1 | <5 | Occasionally | Occasionally | Occasionally |
| 2 | 5-10 | Daily | Daily | Daily |
| 3 | >10 | Each meal | Each meal | Each meal |
Total score 0-12. Score ≤3 = successful treatment.
Chicago Classification (Manometric Types)
High-resolution manometry (HRM) classifies achalasia into 3 types based on the pattern of pressurisation:
| Type | Oesophageal Pattern | Response to Treatment |
|---|
| Type I (Classic) | Aperistalsis, no pressurisation | Moderate |
| Type II | Aperistalsis + pan-oesophageal pressurisation | Best response |
| Type III (Spastic) | Premature/spastic contractions | Poorest - benefits from long myotomy (POEM) |
The diagnostic hierarchy uses Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) - elevated IRP is the hallmark. Diagnosis falls under "disorders of OGJ outflow."
Investigations / Diagnostic Evaluation
A thorough evaluation is mandatory - EGD, barium swallow, and oesophageal manometry should be performed routinely.
1. Endoscopy (EGD)
- First test performed in dysphagia
- Findings: frothy saliva pooling, food residue, dilated tortuous oesophagus, tight/spastic OGJ that allows the scope to pass with gentle pressure
- ~30-40% of endoscopies are normal - a normal endoscopy does NOT exclude achalasia (Bailey)
- In ~40% of patients the test is normal; remainder show retained food, stasis oesophagitis, or Candida infection (Sabiston)
- Critical role: exclude pseudoachalasia (cancer of gastric cardia mimicking achalasia)
2. Barium Swallow (Contrast Study)
- Classic finding: "Bird's beak" sign - smooth tapering of the distal oesophagus at the OGJ
- Other findings (Sabiston): distal oesophageal narrowing, air-fluid level, slow emptying of contrast, tertiary contractions
- Provides anatomical information: axis (straight vs. sigmoid) and degree of dilation - important for treatment planning
- In early stages, can be normal in ~30% of patients
3. High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) - Gold Standard
- Gold standard for diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders (Bailey)
- Demonstrates: elevated IRP (failure of LES relaxation), absent peristalsis, +/- pan-oesophageal pressurisation or spastic contractions depending on type
- Allows Chicago Classification typing
4. Ambulatory pH Monitoring
- Reserved for patients complaining of heartburn
- Differentiates acid reflux from fermentation-related stasis symptoms
Treatment
The aim of treatment is to reduce the outflow resistance at the LES and improve oesophageal emptying. No treatment restores normal peristalsis.
A. Medical (Pharmacological) Therapy
- Calcium channel blockers, nitrates, 5'-phosphodiesterase inhibitors
- Limited efficacy; used mainly for symptom relief in poor surgical candidates
B. Botulinum Toxin Injection
- Injected endoscopically at the LES; inhibits acetylcholine release from excitatory neurons
- Useful when the diagnosis is in doubt, or in elderly patients with comorbidities unfit for other procedures
- Repeated injection causes scarring, making subsequent treatments more difficult
- Should NOT be offered as first-line in patients suitable for myotomy or pneumatic dilation
C. Pneumatic Dilation (PD)
- Non-compliant balloons (polyethylene) of 30-40 mm diameter inserted over a guidewire to disrupt the sphincter muscle
- Graded serial dilation: 30 mm → 35 mm → 40 mm (Bailey)
- Efficacy: Serial PD has similar efficacy to surgical myotomy in selected patients
- Predictors of good response: age >45 years, female sex, undilated oesophagus, response to first dilation, Type II achalasia
- Complication: Perforation - averaged ~1.9% (0-16%); with 30 mm balloon, <0.5%; risk increases with larger balloons
- Requires experienced endoscopist and surgical backup
- Today, PD is largely reserved for recurrent dysphagia after LHM or POEM (Sabiston)
D. Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) with Partial Fundoplication - Standard Surgical Treatment
Bailey: Anterior myotomy - at least 6 cm proximally on the oesophageal side and 2-3 cm distally into the gastric cardia. Laparoscopic approach is now standard.
Sabiston (detailed operative description):
- 4-5 trocars in upper abdomen
- Gastrohepatic ligament opened; right crus identified; peritoneum and phreno-oesophageal membrane transected
- Short gastric vessels divided (to allow fundoplication without tension)
- Myotomy ~8.5 cm total: 6 cm above GEJ + 2.5 cm onto gastric wall
- Muscle edges separated so mucosa is uncovered for ~140 degrees
Fundoplication (added to prevent GORD):
- Without fundoplication, GORD occurs in up to 40% of patients post-myotomy
- Partial fundoplication is standard; 360° Nissen wrap is contraindicated (increases outflow resistance against aperistaltic oesophagus → dysphagia)
- Dor (anterior): Does not require posterior dissection; avoids risk to posterior vagus nerve
- Toupet (posterior): Requires posterior dissection; helps keep muscular edges separated, reducing recurrent dysphagia
Results (Sabiston):
- Padua group: 90% success in 407 patients at median 2.5 years; 87% asymptomatic at 5 years
- European multicenter study: 84% success at 5 years
- Swedish RCT: 92% excellent results at 5 years; 80% at 10 years
Robotic-assisted LHM: Improved 3D visualisation, degrees of freedom, ergonomics; may decrease mucosal perforations; long-term results similar to LHM; cost remains a barrier.
E. Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
- First described by Dr. Inoue in 2010
- Endoscopic submucosal tunnel technique
Technique (Bailey - Figure 66.27):
- Mucosal opening created
- Submucosal tunnel between mucosa and muscle layer created down to the stomach
- Myotomy begins a short distance below the mucosal opening
- Myotomy carried into the proximal stomach
- Mucosal opening closed with endoclips
- Advantage for Type III achalasia: POEM allows a long myotomy extending into the oesophageal body - better suited than LHM for spastic type
- Short-term results are at least as good as LHM
- Main concern: Higher rate of post-procedure GORD compared to LHM with fundoplication (no antireflux wrap performed)
F. Oesophagectomy
- Reserved for end-stage achalasia with sigmoid/massively dilated megaoesophagus unresponsive to other treatments
Summary Box (Bailey & Love's 28th Ed., Summary Box 66.5)
- Achalasia is the most common oesophageal motility disorder
- A normal endoscopy does NOT exclude the diagnosis of achalasia
- Beware of pseudoachalasia (cancer mimicking achalasia)
- HRM is the gold standard for diagnosis
- Laparoscopic myotomy, pneumatic balloon dilation and POEM are all effective treatments
- Type III achalasia may be better treated with long myotomy by POEM
Comparison: LHM vs POEM vs PD
| Feature | LHM + Fundoplication | POEM | Pneumatic Dilation |
|---|
| Approach | Laparoscopic surgical | Endoscopic | Endoscopic |
| Myotomy length | 8.5 cm | Variable (longer possible) | N/A (disruption) |
| Antireflux protection | Partial fundoplication | None | None |
| GORD rate | Low (with wrap) | Higher | Moderate |
| Best for Type III | No | Yes | No |
| Recurrence | 8-20% at 10 yrs | Short-term comparable | Higher long-term |
| Perforation risk | Mucosal (intraop) | Mucosal | ~1.9% |
Sources:
- Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th Edition - Chapter 66 (Oesophagus), pp. 1143-1147
- Sabiston Textbook of Surgery - Chapter 83 (Oesophagus), pp. 1704-1708