Patient have asd device closure 7.5 month ago , she has all normal reports , no device migration ,no clotting, normal echo report , all things are ok ,can she go for ivf egg transfer process

Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

atrial septal defect device closure IVF pregnancy

Searching the Web

ASD device closure IVF egg transfer safety recommendations cardiology

Searching PubMed

congenital heart disease ASD pregnancy IVF assisted reproduction

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

"atrial septal defect" closure pregnancy outcomes cardiac

Reading Article

PMID: 36528570

Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Reading File
I now have comprehensive information. Here is the full clinical answer:

ASD Device Closure (7.5 months ago) + IVF Embryo Transfer: Clinical Assessment

Short Answer

Yes, she is very likely a good candidate to proceed with IVF embryo transfer, given her clinical picture. Here is the full reasoning.

1. Her Cardiac Risk Category (WHO mWHO I)

According to Creasy & Resnik's Maternal-Fetal Medicine (Table 52.3 - Modified WHO Classification), "successfully repaired simple lesions (atrial or ventricular septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus)" are classified as mWHO Class I - the lowest possible cardiovascular risk category. This means:
  • No detectable increased risk of maternal mortality
  • Only mild or no increase in morbidity
  • Maternal cardiac event rate: ~2.5%-5.9%
  • Requires only 1-2 cardiology visits during the entire pregnancy
Her normal echo, no device migration, no clot, and no residual shunt puts her firmly in this best-case category.

2. What the Textbooks Say About Repaired ASD and Pregnancy/Reproduction

From Braunwald's Heart Disease (15th ed.) and Creasy & Resnik's:
"Women with successful closure of isolated left-to-right shunts are at low risk for complications during pregnancy. In the absence of other risk factors such as cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac events after closure, systemic ventricular dysfunction, or pulmonary hypertension, women with repaired shunts can deliver at their local hospital."
This is about natural pregnancy, but the principle extends to IVF - the cardiac risk of the patient herself is low. What needs specific attention with IVF is discussed below.

3. IVF-Specific Considerations

IVF is not simply "pregnancy" - the egg stimulation phase and transfer carry specific risks that need to be considered in a cardiac patient:

a. Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS)

  • OHSS causes fluid shifts, hemoconcentration, and a hypercoagulable state - all of which increase thrombotic risk.
  • In a patient with a well-closed ASD with no residual shunt, paradoxical embolism risk is minimal, but thromboprophylaxis should still be discussed with the fertility team, particularly if OHSS occurs.
  • The fertility team should be briefed on the prior ASD closure so that anticoagulation protocols are appropriate.

b. Antiplatelet Therapy Timing

  • Standard post-ASD-device-closure protocol requires aspirin for 6 months (some centers extend to 12 months) and clopidogrel/antiplatelet for ~3-6 months post-procedure to allow endothelialization.
  • At 7.5 months, she is likely either still on aspirin or has just completed her antiplatelet course. This must be clarified before the egg transfer, because:
    • If still on aspirin: most fertility centers are comfortable with low-dose aspirin (81 mg) - it is sometimes even beneficial in IVF (endometrial blood flow). No issue.
    • If dual antiplatelet (aspirin + clopidogrel) is still ongoing: the fertility specialist and cardiologist should coordinate, as this is sometimes adjusted peri-transfer.

c. Embryo Transfer Itself

  • Frozen embryo transfer (FET) is a very low-stress procedure - no general anesthesia, minimal hemodynamic change, very brief. No cardiac concern.
  • Fresh transfer (after stimulation) carries the OHSS risk mentioned above.

d. No Antibiotic Prophylaxis Needed

  • From Creasy & Resnik's: "Those who underwent a device closure do not routinely require antibiotic prophylaxis" for cardiac purposes.

4. When Device Closure Was Done (7.5 Months Ago)

The Amplatzer and similar devices are generally considered fully endothelialized by 6 months. Her echo showing normal results at 7.5 months is very reassuring. The device is stable. The main concern period (first 6 months - risk of device erosion, thrombus formation, arrhythmia) has passed.

5. Practical Recommendations Before Proceeding

StepWho Does ItWhat to Check
Cardiology clearance letterCardiologistConfirm mWHO I, no residual shunt, normal RV/LV function, no PAH
Antiplatelet status reviewCardiologist + REIs she still on aspirin or clopidogrel? Any adjustment needed peri-transfer?
OHSS prevention strategyReproductive endocrinologist (RE)Use GnRH agonist trigger + freeze-all if at risk; avoid fresh transfer if OHSS develops
Thromboprophylaxis planRE + Hematology if neededEspecially important during stimulation and early pregnancy
Inherited CHD risk counselingGenetics / Cardiologist~5-10% risk of CHD in offspring; fetal echo recommended at ~20 weeks if pregnant

6. Supporting Evidence

A 2022 BMC Cardiovascular Disorders study (PMID 36528570) followed 45 pregnant women after percutaneous ASD closure and found all patients maintained Class I functional status with improved right ventricular function - supporting that post-closure patients do well in the reproductive context.

Bottom Line

She can proceed with IVF embryo transfer. Her cardiac situation (mWHO Class I, normal echo at 7.5 months, no complications) does not contraindicate IVF. The key steps are:
  1. Get a formal cardiology clearance letter confirming stable device, no residual shunt, normal cardiac function.
  2. Confirm the antiplatelet/anticoagulation status with the cardiologist before the transfer cycle begins.
  3. The fertility team should have a OHSS prevention strategy in place.
  4. Plan for fetal cardiac echo at ~20 weeks if she achieves pregnancy (small hereditary risk of CHD).
Important note: This is clinical guidance based on established textbook principles and published evidence. The final decision must involve her cardiologist, reproductive endocrinologist, and ideally a maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialist working as a multidisciplinary team.

She is given progestrone in ivf pregnancy, can this affect

Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

progesterone luteal support IVF cardiovascular thrombosis

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

progesterone thromboembolism venous thrombosis risk ART

Searching the Web

progesterone IVF luteal phase support cardiac effects ASD device closure safety

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

progesterone venous thromboembolism risk IVF frozen embryo transfer

Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

progesterone supplementation cardiac safety heart disease pregnancy

Finding Sources
Searching the Web

progesterone luteal support IVF cardiovascular hemodynamic effects venous thrombosis risk heart disease

Excellent - now I have solid evidence. Here is the complete, structured answer:

Does Progesterone in IVF Affect a Patient with Prior ASD Device Closure?

The Short Answer

Progesterone used as luteal phase support in IVF is largely safe for this patient - with important nuances depending on the type of progesterone, the route, and the broader IVF protocol (fresh vs. frozen transfer). The bigger cardiovascular concern in IVF is actually from estrogen/OHSS during the stimulation phase - not from progesterone itself.

How Progesterone Affects the Cardiovascular System

1. Progesterone Has Vasodilatory / Anti-hypertensive Effects

  • Progesterone relaxes smooth muscle in blood vessels, causing peripheral vasodilation and reduced systemic vascular resistance.
  • This is actually protective rather than harmful for most cardiac conditions - it reduces cardiac afterload slightly.
  • In the context of a well-repaired ASD (mWHO Class I), this is not a concern.

2. Natural (Micronized) Progesterone - Very Safe Profile

  • Studies have consistently shown that micronized progesterone (oral or vaginal) does NOT increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial events.
  • A systematic review on micronized progesterone cardiovascular impact (PMID 35112635) found that VTE risk was not altered by micronized progesterone - in contrast to synthetic progestogens (norpregnane derivatives), which do carry thrombotic risk.
  • D-dimer, blood pressure, heart rate, and Framingham risk scores were all unchanged vs. placebo in controlled trials.

3. Synthetic Progestogens - More Caution Needed

  • Dydrogesterone, norethisterone, and other synthetic progestins carry more variable cardiovascular profiles.
  • One PMC review on luteal phase support specifically noted that dydrogesterone may have epigenetic effects including relation to congenital heart disease - this is still under investigation.
  • For a cardiac patient, vaginal micronized progesterone (e.g., Crinone gel, Utrogestan pessaries) is preferred over synthetic progestins.

The Real IVF Cardiovascular Risk - Estrogen, Not Progesterone

IVF TypeVTE Risk vs. Natural Conception
Fresh embryo transfer~8-fold increased VTE risk in first trimester
Frozen embryo transfer (FET)No significant increase in VTE risk
IVF overall (any)2-3x increased VTE risk (meta-analysis of 14 studies)
The elevated risk in fresh transfer is driven by the high-estrogen state from controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) - not from the progesterone luteal support. Frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles have far lower VTE risk because the hyper-estrogenic state is avoided.
For this patient with a prior ASD device closure, this is clinically relevant:
  • If she is doing a frozen embryo transfer (FET) - which is the most common protocol now - the VTE and cardiac stress are minimal.
  • If a fresh transfer, the estrogen-driven thrombotic risk is real and needs proactive thromboprophylaxis planning.

Specific Impact on Her ASD Device

ConcernEffect of ProgesteroneVerdict
Device stability/migrationNoneNo effect
Thrombus on deviceNo procoagulant effect (micronized)No increased risk
ArrhythmiaProgesterone has mild antiarrhythmic propertiesNo concern
Fluid retention / RV overloadMild - progestins can cause water retentionMonitor if symptomatic
Paradoxical embolism riskVTE risk is from estrogen/OHSS, not progesteroneLow risk in FET
Blood pressureSlight vasodilation / BP loweringBeneficial

Practical Recommendations for Her Team

  1. Prefer vaginal micronized progesterone (e.g., Utrogestan 200 mg vaginally, or Crinone gel) over synthetic progestins - safer cardiovascular profile.
  2. Prefer frozen embryo transfer (FET) over fresh transfer to minimize the estrogen-driven VTE risk.
  3. If fresh transfer is needed: discuss low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis with her cardiologist - especially given the prior cardiac procedure.
  4. The progesterone luteal support itself (at standard IVF doses) does not interact with her ASD device, residual cardiac anatomy, or prior antiplatelet therapy in any clinically significant way.
  5. Continue aspirin if still prescribed by her cardiologist - low-dose aspirin is compatible with IVF and may even slightly improve implantation rates.

Bottom Line

Progesterone in IVF is not the cardiovascular concern for this patient. The drug itself - especially micronized/natural progesterone - has a neutral-to-favorable cardiovascular profile. The key risk factor to watch in IVF is the estrogen/OHSS-driven prothrombotic state during stimulation in fresh cycles. Given her repaired ASD with normal echo, she is in the lowest cardiac risk category, and standard luteal progesterone support is safe for her. Just confirm with the cardiologist that micronized progesterone is being used rather than a synthetic progestin.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.