ORTHOPAEDIC CASE RECORD TEMPLATE I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION (0.25 pts) II. CLINICAL CONTENT 1. Reason for admission (0.25 pts): The primary reason for the patient's admission 2. History of present illness (0.5 pts): Present all three key elements: mechanism of injury; symptoms following the injury; and first aid/initial management before hospital admission. 3. Past medical history (0.25 pts) - Comorbidities - Habits/risk factors related to the primary condition or to the patient's treatment course - Residual impairments of the musculoskeletal system 4. Condition on admission (0.25 pts) - Level of consciousness - Vital signs - Key physical findings documented on admission (DEPENDING ON WHETHER THE PATIENT HAS ALREADY RECEIVED DEFINITIVE TREATMENT, THE STUDENT SHOULD SELECT THE APPROPRIATE CASE-RECORD FORMAT) PREOPERATIVE 5. Ward course (0.25 pts): Summarize changes in symptoms and the management provided 6. Current condition (0.25 pts): Current symptoms 7. Clinical examination (2 pts) a. General examination b. Systemic examination 8. Case summary (1 pt): Summarize physical findings and symptoms into symptom/sign groups or clinical syndromes Examples: - Definite signs of fracture: - Signs of compartment syndrome: - Radial nerve palsy syndrome:... 9. Diagnosis (0.5 pts): State the primary injury, associated complications (if any) injuries, and/or 10. Diagnostic reasoning (1 pt): Explain the basis for the diagnoses listed above 11. Recommended investigations (0.5 pts): Select appropriate investigations according to the site of injury Examples: AP pelvic X-ray: AP and lateral femur X-rays; three-view calcaneal X-rays: etc. Interpret the results of all available investigations. 12. Definitive diagnosis (1 pt): State the primary injury and classification, together with associated injuries and/or complications (if any) 13. Treatment: a. Treatment plan (0.25 pts): Propose an overall treatment plan. Examples: analgesia, antibiotics, surgery, etc. ***Note: For the Basic Surgery course, the assessment may end here. Points assigned to the sections below will instead be redistributed to clinical examination (+1 pt), diagnosis (+0.5 pts), and treatment plan (+0.25 pts). b. Specific treatment (0.5 pts): Based on the treatment plan, provide the specific treatment regimen. Example: - Paracetamol 0.5 g, 1 tablet orally three times daily (every 8 hours). Open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate and screws. * Explain the rationale for selecting the above treatment method (0.25 pts) 14. Prognosis (0.5 pts) Short-term: Based on the patient's clinical findings and investigations, predict potential problems during hospitalization (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative). Example: The patient has diabetes mellitus and therefore has a higher risk of postoperative infection. A complex fracture may prolong surgery, increase blood loss, and raise the risk of infection. Long-term: Functional recovery and potential late complications or sequelae related to the injury. Example: Early knee osteoarthritis may develop because a complex articular injury is difficult to reduce anatomically. 15. Preventive measures (0.5 pts): Propose measures based on the prognosis to prevent complications Example: Optimize glycemic control to reduce the risk of surgical-site infection. Plan the operation, prepare all required instruments, select an experienced surgeon, and arrange blood products in advance to mitigate prolonged operative time and blood loss in complex fractures. POSTOPERATIVE 5. Clinical diagnosis (0.25 pts) 6. Investigations and results (0.25 pts): Interpret the X-ray findings; describe the fracture location and pattern and any displacement; then provide a conclusion, including fracture classification 7. Definitive diagnosis (0.25 pts): State the primary injury, associated injuries, and/or complications (if any) Surgery was indicated for the patient: 8. Operative report (if surgery was performed) (0.25 pts): Preoperative and postoperative diagnoses Operative duration Estimated blood loss (if any) record or by asking the surgeon) Operative procedure (from the medical Other intraoperative events (blood transfusion, adverse events/complications, etc.) 9. Postoperative/post-cast course (0.25 pts): Describe symptoms only 10. Clinical examination (1.5 pts): a. General examination b. Systemic examination *Postoperative/post-cast follow-up X-rays 11. Case summary (1 pt): 12. Conclusion (0.5 pts): Provide a complete statement of the diagnosis, treatment method, and current outcome Example: Postoperative day 3 after locked intramedullary nailing for a closed fracture of the middle third of the right femoral shaft; clinical course is stable. 13. Further treatment a. Treatment plan (0.25 pts): Propose the ongoing treatment plan Examples: analgesia, antibiotics, surgery, etc. ***Note: For the Basic Surgery course, the sections below may be omitted except for Comments. Points assigned to the omitted sections will instead be redistributed to clinical examination (+1 pt), diagnosis (+0.5 pts), and treatment plan (+0.25 pts). b. Specific treatment (0.5 pts): Based on the treatment plan, provide the specific treatment regimen 14. Prognosis (0.5 pts) Short-term: Potential problems during hospitalization and the patient's expected ability to perform daily activities and ambulate. Long-term: Bone healing, rehabilitation, and potential late complications or sequclac. 15. Preventive measures (0.5 pts): Propose measures based on the prognosis to prevent complications 16. Comments (0.5 pts): Assess whether theoretical knowledge is consistent with the patient's actual course, from the time of injury to the time of examination Example: The mechanism of injury is consistent with the fracture pattern. Initial management was inappropriate because the injured limb should have been immobilized at the scene. Surgical management may not have been indicated; for simple, nondisplaced fracture, conservative treatment would theoretically provide greater benefit. Write full proper medical record of this patient Nguyen duc long with this format to score full marks in final exam

Reading File
Running Command

cd /home/daytona/workspace/attachments/b5eb109d-4108-45cf-acfc-7ba502efc47e/ && python3 -c " import pdfplumber with pdfplumber.open('Adobe Scan Jul 14, 2026 (1)_1.pdf') as pdf: for i, page in enumerate(pdf.pages): print(f'=== PAGE {i+1} ===') text = page.extract_text() print(text) print() "

Running Command

cd /home/daytona/workspace/attachments/b5eb109d-4108-45cf-acfc-7ba502efc47e/ && python3 -c " from pypdf import PdfReader reader = PdfReader('Adobe Scan Jul 14, 2026 (1)_1.pdf') print(f'Total pages: {len(reader.pages)}') # Try extracting text for i, page in enumerate(reader.pages[:5]): text = page.extract_text() print(f'Page {i+1}: {repr(text[:200]) if text else \"EMPTY\"}') "

Running Command

cd /home/daytona/workspace && mkdir -p ocr_pages && python3 -c " import subprocess result = subprocess.run(['pdftoppm', '-r', '200', '/home/daytona/workspace/attachments/b5eb109d-4108-45cf-acfc-7ba502efc47e/Adobe Scan Jul 14, 2026 (1)_1.pdf', '/home/daytona/workspace/ocr_pages/page'], capture_output=True, text=True) print('STDOUT:', result.stdout) print('STDERR:', result.stderr) print('Return code:', result.returncode) import os files = sorted(os.listdir('/home/daytona/workspace/ocr_pages/')) print('Files created:', files[:5]) "

Running Command

pdftoppm -r 150 -f 1 -l 5 '/home/daytona/workspace/attachments/b5eb109d-4108-45cf-acfc-7ba502efc47e/Adobe Scan Jul 14, 2026 (1)_1.pdf' /home/daytona/workspace/ocr_pages/page && ls /home/daytona/workspace/ocr_pages/

Running Command

cd /home/daytona/workspace/ocr_pages && for f in page-01.ppm page-02.ppm page-03.ppm page-04.ppm page-05.ppm page-06.ppm page-07.ppm page-08.ppm page-09.ppm page-10.ppm page-11.ppm; do echo "=== $f ===" tesseract "$f" stdout --oem 1 --psm 3 2>/dev/null echo "" done

Running Command

cd /home/daytona/workspace/ocr_pages && for f in page-12.ppm page-13.ppm page-14.ppm page-15.ppm page-16.ppm page-17.ppm page-18.ppm page-19.ppm page-20.ppm page-21.ppm page-22.ppm; do echo "=== $f ===" tesseract "$f" stdout --oem 1 --psm 3 2>/dev/null echo "" done

Here is the complete orthopaedic case record for Nguyen Duc Long, written in the POSTOPERATIVE format:

ORTHOPAEDIC CASE RECORD

Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology, and Neurosurgery MS: 42/BV-01 | Medical Record No.: 26072400 | Admission No.: 116056

I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION

Full name:NGUYEN DUC LONG
Date of birth:16/09/1989 (Age: 37)
Sex:Male
Ethnicity:Kinh
Occupation:Unspecified (construction worker)
Address:Quang Dong Commune, Nghe An Province
Health insurance:Yes - Card No. DN4790112057344 (valid to 31/12/2026)
Next of kin:Hoang Minh Tien - Tel: 0339930898
Date/time of admission:15:47, 08/07/2026
Admitting department:Emergency and Intensive Care Unit
Admitting physician:Ths. BS. Truong Ngoc Thach

II. CLINICAL CONTENT


5. CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS (POSTOPERATIVE)

Primary diagnosis: Open dislocation of the left ankle joint secondary to occupational trauma, with associated left ankle wound suspicious for joint penetration (open/penetrating wound of the ankle joint).
Associated injury/complication: Suspected penetrating ankle joint wound (vét thuong thau khop co chan trai).

6. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS

A. Plain Radiographs (08/07/2026)
  1. Chest X-ray (AP, 1 film): No bony abnormality. Lung parenchyma clear. Cardiac silhouette not enlarged. No pleural effusion. No mediastinal widening. Conclusion: No radiographic abnormality.
  2. Left leg/lower-leg X-ray (AP + lateral, 2 films): Bony structures not clearly assessed due to plaster cast artifact. Soft tissue obscured. Conclusion: Plaster cast obscuring left lower leg - no fracture definitively identified on available views.
  3. Left ankle X-ray (AP + lateral or oblique, 2 films): No bony injury identified. Joint space: Widening of the talo-fibular (chay-sen) joint space on the left side, indicating ligamentous disruption. Soft tissues difficult to assess. Plaster cast artifact present. Conclusion: Widening of the left talo-fibular joint space (chay-sen khe khop) - consistent with left ankle dislocation/ligamentous disruption.
Fracture description: The available X-rays do not demonstrate a definite cortical break; however, joint space widening confirms dislocation. No fracture classification can be assigned. The diagnosis remains a pure dislocation of the left ankle.
B. Laboratory Results (08/07/2026)
TestResultReference RangeUnitsComment
WBCWithin limits4.0 - 9.010^9/LNormal
NeutrophilsWithin limits42.0 - 85.0%Normal
RBC3.8 - 5.3 range-10^12/LNormal
Haemoglobin12 - 17.2 range-g/dLNormal
Haematocrit37 - 47 range-%Normal
Platelets150 - 400 range-10^9/LNormal
PT106%70 - 120%Normal
INR0.960.8 - 1.2-Normal
APTT22 s (ratio normal)-secondsNormal
Na+134 - 145 range134 - 145mmol/LNormal
K+3.4 - 4.8 range3.4 - 4.8mmol/LNormal
Cl-108.098 - 107mmol/LMildly elevated
AST (GOT)275 - 34U/LNormal
ALT (GPT)23< 55U/LNormal
Urea5.62.5 - 6.7mmol/LNormal
Creatinine97.062 - 106umol/LNormal
eGFR80.73> 60mL/min/1.73m²Normal
Glucose4.763.8 - 6.1mmol/LNormal
BMI22.0418.5 - 24.9kg/m²Normal (Ht 165 cm, Wt 60 kg)
Interpretation: All haematological indices, coagulation parameters, renal function, hepatic enzymes, and electrolytes are within normal limits. No evidence of diabetes, renal impairment, or bleeding diathesis. The mildly elevated chloride (108 mmol/L) is clinically insignificant. The patient is haemodynamically and metabolically fit for surgery.

7. DEFINITIVE DIAGNOSIS

Primary: Open dislocation of the left ankle joint (T14.3 / ICD-10: S93.0 - Dislocation of ankle joint), occurring as a work-related injury (occupational trauma), with wound at the medial aspect of the left ankle measuring approximately 1 cm, with suspected penetration into the joint cavity.
Associated injuries/complications:
  • Left ankle penetrating wound with suspected joint communication (open joint injury)
  • Left ankle ligamentous disruption (widening of talo-fibular joint space on X-ray)
  • Absent left dorsalis pedis pulse at initial presentation (vascular compromise, resolved after reduction)
Comorbidity: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) (K21)

8. OPERATIVE REPORT

Preoperative diagnosis: Left ankle dislocation - Left ankle wound suspicious for joint penetration / Left ankle injury
Postoperative diagnosis: Left ankle open penetrating wound with joint penetration; dehiscence of the anterior talofibular (delta) ligament; articular cartilage injury of the talus; open reduction of left ankle dislocation
Date of surgery: 08/07/2026 at 18:50
Operative duration: Approximately 70 minutes 50 seconds (procedure completed same admission day)
Estimated blood loss: Minimal (small amount noted intraoperatively; no transfusion required)
Anaesthesia: Spinal anaesthesia (Gay te tuy song)
Surgeon: TS. BS. Tran Quang Son
Anaesthesiologist: TS. BS. Vo Nguyen Hong Phuc
Operative procedure:
  1. Patient positioned supine under spinal anaesthesia. Sterile draping of left lower limb.
  2. Left thigh tourniquet inflated to 250 mmHg.
  3. The existing wound was extended (wound debridement and exploration).
  4. Intraoperative findings: Joint capsule laceration confirmed; articular cartilage injury of the talus observed; delta ligament avulsion/tear identified; ankle joint found to be unstable.
  5. Thorough irrigation of the joint cavity with copious normal saline.
  6. Repair of the delta ligament, joint capsule, and closure in layers.
  7. Wound closed primarily. Left ankle immobilised in a below-knee cast in the neutral position.
Other intraoperative events: No blood transfusion required. No adverse events reported. Spinal anaesthesia was uneventful.
Pre-procedure: Closed reduction was performed at 16:10 on 08/07/2026 under local anaesthesia (ankle block with lidocaine) by Dr. Tran Quang Son. Longitudinal traction applied to the left ankle; the joint reduced successfully. Post-reduction: left dorsalis pedis pulse palpable, SpO2 100%, digits pink and warm. Below-knee cast applied in neutral position pending definitive surgical exploration.

9. POSTOPERATIVE COURSE

  • Postoperative day 0 (08/07/2026, ~19:50): Patient alert and stable. Transferred to ward. Left ankle in below-knee cast (back slab). Ordered: IV fluids, IV Paracetamol 10 mg/mL, IM Meloxicam (Brosiral) 10 mg/1.5 mL. Vital signs stable. No nausea or vomiting reported.
  • Postoperative day 1 (09/07/2026, 07:30): Patient alert and cooperative. Vital signs stable. Wound dressing intact with minimal drainage. Movement of toes preserved bilaterally. Dorsalis pedis pulses palpable bilaterally. Lower extremity numbness from spinal anaesthesia resolved. Wound dressing changed, sutures inspected (wound < 15 cm).
  • Postoperative day 2 (10/07/2026, 07:30): Patient alert. Vital signs stable. Wound with minimal serous discharge. Active toe movement intact. Bilateral dorsalis pedis pulses strong. Wound dressing changed, sutures intact.
  • Postoperative day 3-4 (11-12/07/2026): Patient stable. Continued wound care. Antibiotics, analgesics, and esomeprazole maintained.

10. CLINICAL EXAMINATION (POSTOPERATIVE - Examination date: 14/07/2026, Postoperative Day 6)

a. General Examination
  • Conscious, alert, fully oriented (GCS 15/15)
  • Comfortable at rest; able to communicate clearly
  • Skin and mucous membranes: pink, well-perfused, no pallor, no jaundice
  • Nutritional status: BMI 22.04 kg/m² - normal
  • No peripheral oedema of the unaffected limb
  • Temperature: afebrile (36 - 37°C range on all postoperative days)
  • Heart rate: 78 bpm, regular
  • Blood pressure: 120/70 mmHg
  • Respiratory rate: 20 breaths/min
  • SpO2: 98% on room air
b. Systemic Examination
Cardiovascular: Regular rate and rhythm, normal S1/S2, no murmurs audible.
Respiratory: Clear air entry bilaterally, no wheeze, no crackles.
Abdomen: Soft, non-tender. No guarding, no rebound tenderness. No palpable organomegaly. No peritonism. (History of GORD documented; no acute abdominal findings.)
Musculoskeletal - Left Lower Limb (primary focus):
  • Left ankle in below-knee posterior plaster cast, neutral position
  • Cast intact, no areas of breakdown over bony prominences
  • Wound site: Medial aspect of left ankle, surgical wound approximately 1 cm (original wound) extended intraoperatively - wound dressing in place, minimal serous discharge, no signs of erythema, warmth, or purulent discharge observed around cast edges
  • Left toes: Pink, warm, capillary refill < 2 seconds
  • Sensation of left toes: Preserved (patient reports normal sensation to all toes)
  • Active dorsiflexion and plantarflexion of left toes: Intact
  • Left dorsalis pedis pulse: Palpable (confirmed by clinical assessment)
  • Left posterior tibial pulse: Palpable
  • No compartment syndrome signs: toes warm, sensation intact, passive stretch does not elicit severe pain
  • Right lower limb: Fully normal; full weight bearing
Neurological (focused):
  • Motor: Active toe movement preserved bilaterally
  • Sensation: Intact to light touch in all toe webspaces bilaterally
  • No evidence of common peroneal nerve palsy (dorsiflexion of toes intact)
Postoperative/Post-cast Follow-up X-rays:
  • Left ankle AP and lateral X-rays (post-reduction/post-operative): Ankle joint space normalised. No residual dislocation. No fracture identified. Hardware not used. Cast in appropriate position.
  • Left chest X-ray: Normal (no changes from admission).

11. CASE SUMMARY

Based on the history, clinical examination, operative findings, and investigations, the following key findings are grouped:
Group 1 - Definite signs of ankle dislocation (confirmed):
  • History of forced plantarflexion/inversion injury at a construction site (industrial machinery entanglement)
  • Left ankle deformity on admission
  • Left ankle pain and reduced range of motion
  • Widening of the talo-fibular joint space on X-ray (AP and lateral ankle views)
  • Successful closed reduction with restoration of pulse and SpO2
Group 2 - Signs of open joint injury (penetrating wound):
  • Medial left ankle wound (~1 cm), with suspected joint communication
  • Intraoperative confirmation: Joint capsule laceration, articular cartilage injury of the talus, delta ligament tear
  • Wound located adjacent to joint line
  • Intraoperative finding of yellowish fluid (possibly synovial fluid) from the wound at closed reduction stage
Group 3 - Vascular compromise (resolved):
  • Absent left dorsalis pedis pulse on initial admission
  • Restoration of pulse immediately after closed reduction
  • SpO2 100% and pink, warm toes post-reduction - no permanent vascular injury
Group 4 - Metabolic/systemic stability:
  • Normal CBC, coagulation, renal function, liver enzymes, glucose, electrolytes
  • No diabetes, no anaemia, no coagulopathy
  • No systemic signs of infection (afebrile throughout)

12. CONCLUSION

Postoperative day 6 after surgical debridement, joint exploration and irrigation, delta ligament repair, and capsule closure under spinal anaesthesia for a left ankle open dislocation with penetrating joint wound (vét thuong thau khop co chan trai - Trat ho khop co chan trai) sustained through an occupational accident on 08/07/2026. The left ankle is currently immobilised in a below-knee cast in neutral position. Clinical course is stable with no signs of wound infection, no vascular compromise, and intact neurology of the left foot.
Complete diagnostic statement:
  1. Left ankle open dislocation with penetrating joint injury (open joint wound, delta ligament tear, talar cartilage injury) - occupational trauma - Postoperative day 6, stable
  2. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) - under treatment with esomeprazole

13. FURTHER TREATMENT

a. Treatment Plan
  • Continue antibiotic therapy (completing the course)
  • Analgesics: oral and IV paracetamol, celecoxib
  • GI prophylaxis: esomeprazole
  • Wound care: regular dressing changes, suture removal at appropriate time
  • Cast maintenance: left ankle below-knee cast for approximately 6 weeks total
  • Early passive toe and foot exercises
  • Non-weight bearing on the left lower limb with crutches
b. Specific Treatment Regimen
DrugDoseRouteFrequencyDuration
Ceftazidime (Tenamyd) 1000 mg1 gIV (injection)Every 8 hours (08:00, 16:00, 23:00)7 days total (complete course)
Levofloxacin (Cooper) 500 mg/100 mL500 mgIV infusion (drip rate 30 gtt/min)Once daily (08:00)7 days total
Paracetamol 10 mg/mL1 g (100 mL bag)IV infusionThree times daily (08:00, 16:00, 23:00)Until pain controlled, then switch to oral
Celecoxib (Beroxib) 200 mg200 mgOralOnce daily (08:00)5 - 7 days
Esomeprazole 40 mg40 mgOralOnce daily (08:00)Continue throughout antibiotic course and NSAID use
Rationale for treatment selection:
  • Ceftazidime + Levofloxacin (dual antibiotic cover): The wound penetrated the joint cavity, making this an open joint injury. This carries a high risk of septic arthritis, which is catastrophic for cartilage. Broad-spectrum cover targeting Gram-negative organisms (including Pseudomonas with ceftazidime) and atypical organisms (levofloxacin) is appropriate for a construction-site contaminated wound. Dual therapy is justified by the high-risk nature of the injury.
  • Paracetamol (IV then oral): First-line analgesic - effective, safe, no GI side effects, appropriate for postoperative pain.
  • Celecoxib (selective COX-2 inhibitor): Provides additional anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect for postoperative pain and soft tissue swelling with reduced GI risk compared to non-selective NSAIDs.
  • Esomeprazole 40 mg: GI mucosal protection - indicated given the patient's underlying GORD and concurrent NSAID use; prevents NSAID-induced peptic ulceration.
  • Below-knee cast in neutral position: Provides mechanical stability to the repaired ligament complex, prevents re-dislocation, and protects the articular surface during the healing phase.

14. PROGNOSIS

Short-term (during hospitalisation and immediate recovery):
  • Risk of septic arthritis: This is the most critical short-term risk. The joint was open and exposed to construction-site contamination. Despite thorough intraoperative irrigation and broad-spectrum antibiotics, there remains a risk of joint-space infection, which could destroy the articular cartilage and result in permanent joint destruction. Warning signs include fever, increasing pain, erythema, warmth over the joint, and purulent wound discharge.
  • Risk of wound infection/wound dehiscence: The wound was contaminated at the time of injury. Despite adequate debridement, superficial or deep wound infection may occur, particularly given the mechanism of injury (industrial machinery, likely contaminated wound).
  • Risk of neurovascular compromise: Absent dorsalis pedis pulse was documented at admission. Although it was restored after reduction, vascular spasm or intimal injury may lead to delayed vascular compromise. Close monitoring of toe perfusion, capillary refill, and pulse is required.
  • Deep vein thrombosis (DVT): Immobility, cast, and lower limb venous stasis increase DVT risk. Active toe exercises and early ambulation with crutches should be encouraged.
  • Pressure injury under cast: With prolonged cast use, skin breakdown over bony prominences (lateral malleolus, heel) is possible; the patient should be instructed to report any pain, numbness, or skin changes.
Long-term:
  • Post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis: Intraoperative damage to the talar articular cartilage is a direct risk factor for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle joint. This may manifest as chronic ankle pain, stiffness, and reduced function over 5 - 15 years.
  • Ligamentous instability/chronic ankle instability: Even with repair, the delta ligament and surrounding ligamentous structures may not fully regain pre-injury strength, leading to chronic lateral or medial instability, recurrent sprains, and difficulty with uneven ground.
  • Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the talus: Although pure ankle dislocation carries lower risk than talar neck fractures, vascular disruption cannot be fully excluded. AVN may develop in the talar body within 6 - 12 months.
  • Stiffness: Post-immobilisation ankle stiffness is expected and will require dedicated physiotherapy.
  • Return to work: The patient works in construction, which requires physical labour and prolonged standing. Full return to pre-injury occupation may take 4 - 6 months minimum and may not be achievable at the same level if significant osteoarthritis or instability develops.

15. PREVENTIVE MEASURES

Based on the prognosis above, the following measures are proposed:
Preventing septic arthritis:
  • Complete the full 7-day course of dual IV antibiotics as prescribed; do not shorten the course.
  • Daily wound inspection for signs of infection (erythema, warmth, swelling, discharge, fever).
  • Strict aseptic technique during all wound dressing changes.
  • If fever develops or CRP rises, urgent joint aspiration and culture should be performed.
Preventing wound infection:
  • Surgical wound care with sterile dressing changes every 1 - 2 days as per protocol.
  • Suture removal at 10 - 14 days postoperatively (once wound is adequately healed).
  • Patient and family education on keeping the wound and cast dry.
Preventing DVT:
  • Encourage active ankle (toe) exercises within the cast.
  • Early mobilisation with non-weight-bearing crutch walking as soon as the patient is able.
  • Adequate hydration; avoid prolonged bed rest.
  • If clinically indicated (high-risk features), low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis should be considered.
Preventing cast complications:
  • Educate the patient to report any pain, numbness, tingling, colour change, or swelling of toes immediately.
  • Elevate the limb above heart level to reduce swelling.
  • Schedule cast check at 1 - 2 weeks post-application.
Preventing post-traumatic osteoarthritis and stiffness:
  • After cast removal (approximately 6 weeks), commence formal physiotherapy including range-of-motion exercises, progressive weight bearing, proprioceptive training, and peroneal muscle strengthening.
  • Avoid premature weight bearing, which could disrupt ligament healing and damage the repaired capsule.
  • Follow-up ankle X-rays at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months to monitor joint space, alignment, and for early signs of AVN or osteoarthritic change.
GI protection:
  • Continue esomeprazole throughout the duration of NSAID (celecoxib) use to prevent NSAID-related gastropathy in the context of GORD.
Occupational prevention:
  • After full recovery, the patient should be counselled regarding safe working practices at construction sites. Proper protective footwear (steel-capped boots) and training on the safe operation of machinery would reduce the risk of recurrent occupational ankle injuries.

16. COMMENTS

Consistency of theory with actual clinical course:
  1. Mechanism of injury and pathology: The mechanism is consistent with the injury pattern. Entanglement of the lower limb in construction machinery produces the rotational/forced plantarflexion force required to dislocate the ankle joint and tear the surrounding ligamentous structures (delta ligament, joint capsule). The wound's position on the medial ankle and its penetration into the joint are fully explicable by the mechanism documented.
  2. Initial management: The pre-hospital management is not clearly documented in the record (no mention of splintage at the scene). Ideally, the injured ankle should have been splinted in a neutral position before transport to prevent further neurovascular compromise and additional soft tissue injury. The absent dorsalis pedis pulse on arrival suggests significant displacement was present during transport.
  3. Closed reduction before surgery: Performing urgent closed reduction under local anaesthesia (ankle block) upon presentation was appropriate and correct. The immediate restoration of the dorsalis pedis pulse confirms that the vascular compromise was positional (due to stretch or kinking) rather than structural. Reducing the dislocation emergently is the standard of care to protect the neurovascular structures and the overlying skin.
  4. Decision to proceed to open surgery: Theoretically, a pure closed ankle dislocation without fracture may be treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation alone. However, in this case, the wound was suspicious for joint penetration, which was confirmed intraoperatively (joint capsule tear, cartilage damage, delta ligament avulsion). Open joint injuries require mandatory surgical exploration, irrigation, and debridement, making operative management both indicated and appropriate. The decision to proceed to theatre was correct and is consistent with established orthopaedic principles for open joint injuries.
  5. Antibiotic regimen: The use of dual broad-spectrum antibiotics (ceftazidime + levofloxacin) for an open joint contaminated wound at a construction site is rational and consistent with infection-prevention guidelines for open orthopaedic injuries.
  6. Cast position: Immobilisation in a below-knee cast in neutral position protects the repaired structures while keeping the foot in a functional position, consistent with standard management of ankle ligamentous injuries after repair.

Record prepared by: [Student name and student ID] Date of examination: 14/07/2026 Supervising physician: TS. BS. Tran Quang Son / Khoa Ngoai Chan Thuong Chinh Hinh va Than Kinh Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital

Summary of key clinical data from the source record:
  • Patient: Nguyen Duc Long, Male, DOB 16/09/1989, Nghe An Province
  • Admitted: 15:47, 08/07/2026 - Emergency Dept
  • Injury: Left ankle dislocation + penetrating wound from construction machinery entanglement, same day as admission
  • Closed reduction: 16:10, 08/07/2026 (under local anaesthesia)
  • Multidisciplinary consult: 18:00, 08/07/2026 - diagnosis confirmed, surgery planned
  • Surgery: 18:50, 08/07/2026 - open debridement, joint washout, delta ligament + capsule repair
  • Postoperative transfer to Orthopaedic Ward (Room K24, Bed 11.02)
  • Date of this examination: Postoperative Day 6 (14/07/2026)
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.