This is a great question to clarify. After checking the actual Lippincott text directly, here is what is really happening:
What Lippincott Actually Says
Lippincott Illustrated Reviews: Biochemistry (8e) does not say gluconeogenesis occurs in the renal medulla. What it says is:
"Some tissues, such as the brain, erythrocytes, kidney medulla, lens and cornea of the eye, testes, and exercising skeletal muscle, require a continuous supply of glucose as a metabolic fuel."
The kidney medulla is listed as a glucose consumer, not a glucose producer. This is consistent with what Brenner & Rector says.
The Correct Picture (All Sources Agree)
| Kidney Zone | Role in Glucose Metabolism |
|---|
| Renal cortex (proximal tubule) | Produces glucose via gluconeogenesis |
| Renal medulla | Consumes glucose (depends on glycolysis) |
This is precisely why the kidney is not always a net exporter of glucose - the medulla's consumption can offset the cortex's production.
Harper's Illustrated Biochemistry (32e) states this explicitly:
"While the renal cortex may contribute ~10% of whole-body gluconeogenesis after a short-term fast, the kidney is not a net source of glucose, because the renal medulla is a consumer of glucose."
Basic Medical Biochemistry (6e) also confirms:
"The glucose produced by the kidney cortex is used by the kidney medulla, but some may enter the bloodstream."
Summary
The likely source of confusion is that Lippincott mentions the kidney medulla in the context of gluconeogenesis - but as a tissue that requires glucose, not one that produces it. Gluconeogenesis in the kidney is firmly localized to the renal cortex, specifically the proximal tubule (S1 > S2 > S3 segments).