lymphoma
lymphoma classification WHO 2022
| Feature | Hodgkin Lymphoma | Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma |
|---|---|---|
| Nodal spread | Orderly, contiguous | Noncontiguous, unpredictable |
| Sites | Axial nodes (cervical, mediastinal, para-aortic) | Multiple peripheral nodes |
| Extranodal | Rare | Common |
| Waldeyer ring / mesenteric | Rarely involved | Commonly involved |
| Defining cell | Reed-Sternberg cell | Depends on subtype |
| Subtype | Frequency | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Nodular sclerosis (NS) | ~75% | Most common; bulky anterior mediastinal mass; only subtype without male preponderance |
| Mixed cellularity (MC) | 15-20% | More common in HIV, developing countries; aggressive |
| Lymphocyte-rich | ~5% | Favorable prognosis |
| Lymphocyte-depleted (LD) | <5% | Rarest; aggressive, advanced-stage |
| Entity | Notes |
|---|---|
| Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), NOS | ~30% of all NHL worldwide; most common subtype |
| Follicular lymphoma | ~20%; more frequent in North America/Western Europe; indolent |
| Extranodal marginal zone/MALT lymphoma | 5-10%; often gastric (H. pylori-associated) |
| Small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL/CLL) | Solid-phase equivalent of CLL |
| Mantle cell lymphoma | t(11;14); cyclin D1 overexpression; aggressive |
| Burkitt lymphoma | t(8;14); c-MYC; highly aggressive |
| Primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma | Young women |
| Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma / Waldenström's | IgM secretion |
| High-grade B-cell lymphoma (MYC + BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements) | "Double/triple hit"; very poor prognosis |
| Primary effusion lymphoma | HHV-8-associated; HIV patients |
| Plasmablastic lymphoma | HIV/immunosuppression-associated |
| Entity | Notes |
|---|---|
| Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, NOS | Most common T-cell NHL |
| Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma | |
| Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL), ALK+ / ALK- | CD30+; better prognosis when ALK+ |
| Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma | HTLV-1 associated |
| Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type | EBV-associated; endemic Asia |
| Mycosis fungoides / Sézary syndrome | Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma |
| Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma | Risk with anti-TNF agents |
| Translocation | Lymphoma |
|---|---|
| t(8;14) | Burkitt lymphoma (MYC activation) |
| t(11;14) | Mantle cell lymphoma (cyclin D1) |
| t(14;18) | Follicular lymphoma (BCL2) |
| t(2;5) | ALCL, ALK+ (NPM-ALK fusion) |
klebsiella pneumoniae
Klebsiella pneumoniae resistance treatment
| Species | Disease |
|---|---|
| K. rhinoscleromatis | Rhinoscleroma - chronic granulomatous upper respiratory disease; "Mikulicz cells" (large vacuolated histiocytes); causes "Hebra nose" deformity |
| K. ozaenae | Ozena - chronic atrophic rhinitis with foul smell |
| K. granulomatis | Granuloma inguinale (Donovanosis) - sexually transmitted; painless genital ulcers; "Donovan bodies" (safety-pin organisms within macrophages on Giemsa stain) |
| Carbapenemase class | Examples | Geographic prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| KPC (Serine carbapenemase) | KPC-2, KPC-3 | Americas, global spread |
| MBL (Metallo-β-lactamase) | NDM-1, NDM-5, VIM, IMP | Eastern Europe, Asia, South Asia |
| OXA-type | OXA-48, OXA-181 | Mediterranean, Middle East |
| Drug | Effective against |
|---|---|
| Ceftazidime-avibactam | KPC, OXA-48; NOT MBLs (NDM) |
| Meropenem-vaborbactam | KPC; NOT MBLs |
| Imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam | KPC; NOT MBLs |
| Cefiderocol | Broad including MBLs; activity vs. KPC/OXA |
| Aztreonam-avibactam | MBLs (NDM) + KPC combinations |
| Polymyxins (colistin, polymyxin B) | Last resort; significant nephrotoxicity |
| Tigecycline / Eravacycline | Activity but limited for bacteremia |
| Omadacycline | Active if tetracycline-susceptible |
levels of hypoglycemia
hypoglycemia classification levels ADA
hypoglycemia definition management diabetes
| Level | Glucose Threshold | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | <70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) but ≥54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) | Alert value; hypoglycemia threshold - warrants treatment action |
| Level 2 | <54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) | Clinically significant; neuroglycopenic symptoms begin; requires immediate treatment |
| Level 3 | No specific glucose cutoff | Severe event with altered mental and/or physical functioning requiring assistance from another person for recovery |
| Plasma Glucose | Physiological Event |
|---|---|
| ~80-85 mg/dL | Insulin secretion begins to decrease (first defense) |
| ~70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) | Counterregulatory hormones released: glucagon (primary) and epinephrine (primary), then norepinephrine, growth hormone, cortisol |
| ~60-70 mg/dL (3.3-3.9 mmol/L) | Autonomic/neurogenic symptoms appear |
| ~50-55 mg/dL (2.8-3.1 mmol/L) | Neuroglycopenic symptoms appear; cognitive impairment begins |
| <50 mg/dL | Seizure, loss of consciousness, coma possible |
| <20-30 mg/dL | Brain damage, death if uncorrected |
Key point: In hypoglycemia unawareness (common in long-standing type 1 diabetes), the autonomic warning symptoms are blunted or absent. This is because the glucagon secretory response to hypoglycemia becomes deficient first, followed by loss of the epinephrine response. Patients then progress directly to neuroglycopenic symptoms with no warning. This is also seen with:
- β-adrenergic blockers (mask autonomic symptoms)
- Diabetic autonomic neuropathy
- Anesthetized/sedated patients (signs of sympathetic activation mimic "light anesthesia")
| Hormone | Source | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Glucagon (primary) | Pancreatic α-cells | Stimulates hepatic glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis |
| Epinephrine (primary) | Adrenal medulla | Stimulates glycogenolysis; mobilizes gluconeogenic substrates; inhibits insulin secretion |
| Norepinephrine | Sympathetic nerves | Similar to epinephrine |
| Cortisol | Adrenal cortex | Promotes gluconeogenesis; provides amino acid precursors |
| Growth hormone | Anterior pituitary | Reduces glucose uptake; promotes lipolysis (alternative fuel) |
| Level | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Level 1 (conscious, able to swallow) | 15-20 g oral carbohydrates (e.g., 4 oz juice, glucose tablets); recheck in 15 min ("15-15 rule") |
| Level 2 (conscious) | Same as Level 1 but more urgent; consider larger glucose dose |
| Level 3 (unconscious / unable to swallow) | 25 g IV dextrose (50 mL of D50W) OR 1 mg IM/SC glucagon; goal: blood glucose >100 mg/dL |
In patients on β-blockers: glucagon is the preferred agent because it acts downstream of the β-receptor via cAMP.
In patients with long-standing diabetes: the glucagon response is often deficient, so epinephrine/IV glucose becomes the primary rescue.
Find the latest ADA guidelines on glucose monitoring
ADA Standards of Care diabetes glucose monitoring 2025
ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2025 glucose monitoring guidelines
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/48/Supplement_1/S1…
ADA Standards of Care 2026 diabetes technology glucose monitoring CGM recommendations
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/49/Supplement_1/S1…
continuous glucose monitoring outcomes diabetes
ADA 2026 Standards Care diabetes section 7 technology CGM recommendations changes from 2025
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12690173
Source: ADA Standards of Care in Diabetes - 2026, published January 2026 in Diabetes Care, Supplement 1. This is the most current ADA guidance. The 2026 edition represents the strongest endorsement of diabetes technology the ADA has ever issued.
| Topic | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| CGM initiation timing | Offered early in type 1 diabetes | Recommended at diagnosis and anytime thereafter for all ages |
| Who qualifies for CGM | Insulin users; consider for non-insulin T2D | Anyone using insulin, at risk for hypoglycemia, or where CGM data could help management |
| Open-source AID systems | Not formally addressed | New: Clinicians should support patients using open-source AID systems (Rec 7.27) |
| Combined technology use | Limited guidance | New: Consider combining CGM + insulin pump + diabetes apps (Rec 7.28) |
| Inpatient CGM | Continue if wearing (Rec 7.31) | Maintained, with clearer institutional protocol emphasis (Rec 7.29-7.30) |
BGM remains the fallback when CGM is unavailable, inaccurate, or during rapid glucose changes (>2 mg/dL/min), CGM warm-up, transmission disruptions, or calibration needs.
This marks a significant expansion from 2025's language, which tied the recommendation more narrowly to insulin users.
| Type | Description | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| rtCGM (Real-time CGM) | Continuously streams glucose + trend arrows + alarms | Preferred (Grade A for T1D; Grade B adults; Grade C youth) |
| isCGM (Intermittently scanned CGM) | Requires scan to obtain reading (e.g., FreeStyle Libre) | Recommended alternative (Grade B adults; Grade C youth) |
For T2D not on insulin: RCT data consistently show CGM superiority over BGM for improving A1C, Time in Range (TIR), Time Below Range (TBR), and Time Above Range (TAR), as well as user satisfaction.
| Metric | Target Range | Goal (General T1D/T2D) |
|---|---|---|
| TIR (Time in Range) | 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10 mmol/L) | >70% (>16.8 hrs/day) |
| Time in Tight Target Range (TITR) | 70-140 mg/dL (3.9-7.8 mmol/L) | Higher is better (new metric gaining prominence) |
| Time Below Range Level 1 (TBR L1) | <70 mg/dL | <4% |
| Time Below Range Level 2 (TBR L2) | <54 mg/dL | <1% |
| Time Above Range Level 1 (TAR L1) | >180 mg/dL | <25% |
| Time Above Range Level 2 (TAR L2) | >250 mg/dL | <5% |
Benefits of CGM have been shown to be consistent regardless of age, sex, education level, income, or baseline diabetes characteristics.
| Patient Type | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| T1D (any age), at diagnosis | Strongly recommended (Grade A) |
| T2D on insulin | Recommended (Grade A-B) |
| T2D on non-insulin meds (sulfonylurea, etc.) | Recommended - expanded in 2026 |
| T2D on lifestyle/non-hypoglycemia meds only | Consider - if CGM data would help (Grade B) |
| Pregnant (T2D or GDM) | Recommended with Dexcom G7, FreeStyle Libre 2/3 |
| Hospitalized patients already on CGM | Continue (with POC backup) |
antibiotics of choice in urosepsis
urosepsis antibiotic treatment empirical therapy
urinary tract infection sepsis bacteremia antibiotic management
urosepsis antibiotic management empiric therapy guidelines 2024 2025 IDSA Surviving Sepsis
https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/complicated-uri…
| Step | Question |
|---|---|
| 1. Severity of illness | Sepsis or septic shock? → Broader, IV coverage immediately |
| 2. Resistance risk factors | ESBL, carbapenem-resistant organisms, or Pseudomonas risk? |
| 3. Patient-specific factors | Allergies, renal function, pregnancy, organ failure |
| 4. Local antibiogram (if septic) | If antibiogram available and relevant, use it to refine choice |
| Agent | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Ceftriaxone | 1-2 g IV q24h | First-line for community-acquired urosepsis without resistance risk; excellent gram-negative coverage |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 3.375 g IV q6h (or 4.5 g q8h ext. infusion) | Broader spectrum; appropriate if mild resistance risk; do NOT use if local pip-tazo resistance >10-20% |
| Cefepime | 1-2 g IV q8-12h | 4th-generation; covers Pseudomonas; good for ESBL-low-risk nosocomial urosepsis |
| Ciprofloxacin | 400 mg IV q8-12h (or 500 mg PO BID) | Reserve for patients with no recent fluoroquinolone exposure; do not use empirically if >10-20% local resistance |
Goldman-Cecil Medicine: "Empiric treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g IV q6h or ceftriaxone 1-2 g IV q24h should be initiated promptly. Empiric treatment need not routinely include Pseudomonas coverage."
| Agent | Dose | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cefepime | 2 g IV q8h | Preferred anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam | 4.5 g IV q6h (extended infusion) | Anti-pseudomonal BL/BLI |
| Meropenem | 1 g IV q8h | For severe Pseudomonas risk or prior cefepime failure |
| Imipenem-cilastatin | 500 mg IV q6h | Alternative carbapenem |
| Agent | Notes |
|---|---|
| Meropenem 1 g IV q8h | Drug of choice for ESBL infections with sepsis/septic shock |
| Ertapenem 1 g IV q24h | Good option for stable ESBL without Pseudomonas risk; once-daily dosing |
| Imipenem-cilastatin | Alternative carbapenem |
Recent meta-analysis (PMID 39173739): Carbapenems are superior to piperacillin-tazobactam for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections - do not use pip-tazo empirically when ESBL is likely.
| Carbapenemase type | Preferred agents |
|---|---|
| KPC | Ceftazidime-avibactam; meropenem-vaborbactam; imipenem-relebactam |
| MBL (NDM, VIM) | Ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam; cefiderocol |
| OXA-48 | Ceftazidime-avibactam; cefiderocol |
These newer BL/BLI combinations (ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam) are reserved for confirmed or strongly suspected carbapenem-resistant infections. Do not use empirically unless the patient has a prior documented CRO.
| Clinical Scenario | First Choice | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Community-acquired urosepsis, no resistance risk | Ceftriaxone 1-2 g IV q24h | Ciprofloxacin IV (if <10% local resistance) |
| Healthcare-associated / mild resistance risk | Piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375-4.5 g IV q6-8h | Cefepime 1-2 g IV q8h |
| Pseudomonas risk | Cefepime 2 g IV q8h | Pip-tazo or meropenem |
| ESBL risk + sepsis | Meropenem 1 g IV q8h | Ertapenem (if no Pseudomonas risk) |
| ESBL risk + septic shock | Meropenem 1-2 g IV q8h | - |
| Carbapenem-resistant KPC | Ceftazidime-avibactam | Meropenem-vaborbactam |
| Carbapenem-resistant MBL (NDM) | Ceftazidime-avibactam + Aztreonam | Cefiderocol |
| Enterococcus suspected (e.g., post-instrumentation) | Add Ampicillin or Vancomycin | - |
Sources: Goldman-Cecil Medicine 2V Set; Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22E (2025); IDSA 2025 Guideline on Complicated UTIs; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Adult Guidelines 2026
pulmonary embolism
pulmonary embolism risk stratification classification ESC guidelines
pulmonary embolism risk stratification PESI RV dysfunction biomarkers