ECG Interpretation - Post-Thrombolysis (Post-STK) ECG
Clinical Context (Handwritten): "Post STK" - patient status post-streptokinase thrombolysis for an acute MI
Machine Parameters
| Parameter | Value |
|---|
| Heart Rate | 82 bpm |
| R-R Interval | 724 ms |
| QRS Duration | 123 ms (wide) |
| QT / QTc | 402 / 472 ms |
| QRS Axis | -57° (Left axis deviation) |
| T Axis | 91° |
| RV5 + SV1 | 0.760 mV |
Machine Diagnosis (Unconfirmed): Ventricular Tachycardia + LVH(?)
The Machine is Wrong - Here's the Correct Interpretation
Finding 1: Accelerated Idioventricular Rhythm (AIVR)
The machine called this "Ventricular Tachycardia" - this is incorrect. The rate is only 82 bpm. True VT requires a rate >100 bpm. At this rate, the correct diagnosis is:
Accelerated Idioventricular Rhythm (AIVR) - rate 60-100 bpm, wide QRS, no preceding P waves
Why this matters clinically: AIVR is a classic, well-recognized reperfusion arrhythmia - it appears within minutes to hours after successful thrombolysis (streptokinase) as the infarcted artery opens and reperfusion occurs. It is generally benign and self-limiting, requires no antiarrhythmic treatment, and is actually a positive sign that the thrombolytic worked. This perfectly matches the handwritten "Post STK" annotation.
ECG features supporting AIVR:
- Wide QRS complexes (~123 ms) with a ventricular/LBBB-like morphology
- Rate 82 bpm (too slow for VT)
- Absent or dissociated P waves
- Regular rhythm
Finding 2: Acute Inferior Wall STEMI
Despite the conduction abnormality, there are clear signs of an acute inferior STEMI still evolving or in the reperfusion phase:
| Lead | Finding |
|---|
| II | Deep QS pattern + ST elevation + tall upright T wave |
| III | Deep QS pattern + ST elevation 4-5 mm + tall T wave |
| aVF | Deep QS pattern + ST elevation 3-4 mm |
| I, aVL | Reciprocal ST depression (mirror image) |
| V1-V3 | ST elevation with broad upright T waves |
The ST elevation in II, III, aVF with reciprocal depression in I and aVL is the hallmark of inferior STEMI, consistent with a right coronary artery (RCA) or dominant left circumflex territory occlusion.
Using modified Sgarbossa criteria (for diagnosing MI in the presence of wide QRS/LBBB), the excessively discordant ST changes in the inferior leads strongly support an acute infarction despite the conduction disturbance.
Finding 3: Left Axis Deviation
- QRS axis = -57° (abnormal left axis deviation, normal -30° to +90°)
- Likely reflects inferior wall infarction (loss of inferior forces) rather than a primary conduction disease
Finding 4: LVH? - Unreliable Here
The machine flagged LVH but RV5+SV1 = only 0.760 mV - this does NOT meet the Sokolow-Lyon voltage criterion for LVH (which requires >3.5 mV). The wide QRS from AIVR makes voltage-based LVH criteria unreliable. LVH cannot be diagnosed on this ECG.
Summary Table
| Finding | Interpretation |
|---|
| Wide QRS, rate 82 bpm | Accelerated Idioventricular Rhythm (AIVR) |
| ST elevation II, III, aVF | Acute / evolving Inferior STEMI |
| Reciprocal depression I, aVL | Confirms inferior STEMI |
| Left axis deviation (-57°) | Secondary to inferior MI |
| Machine's "VT" label | Incorrect - rate too slow; this is AIVR |
| Machine's "LVH" | Cannot diagnose - voltage insufficient |
Clinical Bottom Line
This ECG shows a patient post-streptokinase thrombolysis for an inferior STEMI, with:
- AIVR - a reperfusion arrhythmia indicating the thrombolytic is working. No treatment needed; monitor.
- Evolving inferior STEMI changes still present - serial ECGs, troponins, and clinical assessment for reperfusion success (resolution of chest pain, ST normalization) are essential.
- If ST elevation is not resolving or patient is hemodynamically unstable, rescue PCI should be considered.
Disclaimer: This interpretation is for educational/clinical support purposes. All decisions must be made by the treating physician in context of the full clinical picture.