Ins 551 and ins 536 in low sodium salt... Long term negative effect

Searching the Web

INS 551 INS 536 food additives low sodium salt long term health effects

Searching the Web

potassium ferrocyanide INS 536 food additive safety long term toxicity

Searching PubMed

potassium ferrocyanide food additive toxicity

Searching the Web

INS 551 silicon dioxide food additive anti-caking long term health effects

Here is a thorough breakdown of both additives found in low-sodium salt:

INS 551 and INS 536 in Low-Sodium Salt - Long-Term Effects

What Are These Additives?

Both are anti-caking agents - they prevent salt from clumping in humid conditions.
INS CodeChemical NameFunction
INS 551Silicon Dioxide (SiO₂)Anti-caking agent
INS 536Potassium FerrocyanideAnti-caking agent

INS 536 - Potassium Ferrocyanide

This is the more debated of the two. Here are the known concerns and the evidence:

The Cyanide Question

The compound contains cyanide groups, which understandably raises alarm. However, the cyanide ions are tightly bound to iron with an extremely low dissociation constant (~10⁻²⁴). Normal stomach acid cannot break these bonds, meaning free cyanide is essentially not released during digestion. The compound is biologically inert at food-use levels.

Regulatory Status & ADI

  • JECFA/WHO (1975) and the EU Scientific Committee on Food (1990) both approved it with a group ADI of 0-0.025 mg/kg body weight per day.
  • The UK Committee on Toxicity (COT, 1994) revised this to 0-0.05 mg/kg bw/day, based on a NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) from long-term rat studies at 50 mg/kg, with a 100x safety factor applied.
  • In 2018, the EFSA ANS Panel re-evaluated sodium, potassium, and calcium ferrocyanides and concluded: "Ferrocyanides (E 535-538) are of no safety concern at current authorised use and use levels."
  • Maximum permitted level in salt: 20 mg/kg (individually or combined).

Potential Long-Term Concerns (Where Uncertainty Exists)

  1. Nanoparticle considerations: Not directly applicable to ferrocyanides, but regulators note that long-term studies on combination additive exposure are generally limited.
  2. Kidney function: At very high doses in animal models, there is some evidence of renal tubular effects - but these are far above food-use levels.
  3. People with impaired kidney function: Those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) already need to be cautious with low-sodium salt in general because of the high potassium chloride content (see below), not specifically because of ferrocyanide.
  4. Gap in independent research: A Chemistry Stack Exchange expert honestly noted: "Few studies have been conducted with real population samples over long durations - serious funding and population-level studies are still lacking." The safety is based on animal data + estimated exposure modeling, not long-term human cohort studies.

INS 551 - Silicon Dioxide

Function and Form

Food-grade INS 551 is synthetic amorphous silica - distinct from the crystalline silica associated with silicosis in miners and factory workers. The food form is poorly absorbed by the gut.

Regulatory Status

  • FDA classifies it as GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) under 21 CFR 172.480, at levels not exceeding 2% by weight.
  • EFSA re-evaluated it in 2018 and again in 2024 - concluded it does not raise a safety concern in any population group, including infants.
  • No ADI was set (which means "not specified" - a positive designation, meaning no limit needed at current use levels).

Long-Term Concerns

  1. Nanoparticle uncertainty: EFSA flagged that the proportion of nano-sized particles in food products is poorly characterized. Limited toxicology studies exist specifically for nano-sized fractions of amorphous silica. This remains an open area of research.
  2. Systemic bioavailability: Very low - most passes through the digestive tract unchanged. Precise absorption data in humans is still limited.
  3. Crystalline vs. amorphous distinction is critical: Crystalline silica (industrial exposure, inhaled) causes silicosis, kidney disease, and increased autoimmune disease risk. The food form is amorphous and ingested - these risks do not apply.
  4. No adverse events reported from dietary silicon dioxide to date.

The Bigger Long-Term Concern in Low-Sodium Salt

The additives INS 536 and INS 551 are present in tiny trace quantities (measured in mg/kg of salt). The more significant long-term concern with low-sodium salts is the main ingredient itself - potassium chloride (KCl), which replaces sodium chloride:
  • Hyperkalemia risk: People with CKD, diabetes, heart failure, or those on ACE inhibitors/ARBs/potassium-sparing diuretics can develop dangerous high potassium levels. This is a well-established, clinically significant risk.
  • Cardiovascular benefits: For healthy individuals and hypertensive patients, the higher potassium intake from these salts actually reduces blood pressure and cardiovascular risk - a major benefit confirmed by multiple trials.

Summary

AdditiveLong-Term Risk LevelKey Concern
INS 536 (Potassium Ferrocyanide)Low at permitted levelsCyanide fear is largely unfounded; long-term human cohort data limited
INS 551 (Silicon Dioxide)Low at permitted levelsNanoparticle fraction not fully characterized; amorphous form is not the dangerous crystalline type
KCl (main ingredient)Moderate for specific groupsHyperkalemia risk in CKD, heart failure, and certain drug interactions
Bottom line: At the quantities used in food (ferrocyanides at ≤20 mg/kg of salt, silica at ≤2% of product), both INS 536 and INS 551 are considered safe by major regulatory bodies globally. The honest caveat is that truly long-term, large-population human studies are sparse - the safety assessments rely heavily on animal toxicology data and estimated dietary exposure modeling. If you have kidney disease or take medications affecting potassium, the KCl content in low-sodium salt is a far more immediate concern than either of these additives.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.