Kindly interpret this.

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
I now have sufficient background knowledge from the textbook and a thorough review of all 24 pages of the VNG report. Let me compile the full interpretation.

VNG Report Interpretation

Patient: Suman Phougat | Female, 45 years | Date: 17 April 2026

Overview of Tests Performed

This is a comprehensive Videonystagmography (VNG) evaluation covering six domains: saccades, smooth pursuit, optokinetic (OKN), spontaneous/gaze nystagmus, positional testing (Dix-Hallpike & McClure-Pagnini), and Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV).

1. Saccades

DirectionSpeedPrecisionLatency
Horizontal 0.3 Hz~262 °/s (R & L)92–90328 ms (both)
Horizontal 0.45 Hz~264–282 °/s71–73200–206 ms
Vertical 0.3 Hz210 / 169 °/s (R/L eye)77–80~306 ms
Vertical 0.45 Hz193 / 201 °/s71–77~224 ms
Interpretation:
  • Horizontal saccade velocities are within normal limits (>200 °/s for horizontal is acceptable).
  • Horizontal precision at 0.3 Hz is very good (92/90); at 0.45 Hz it drops to 71–73, which is at the lower edge of normal (normal ≥80 is ideal, but 70s can be acceptable with faster targets).
  • Horizontal latency of 328 ms at 0.3 Hz is mildly prolonged (normal typically <250–280 ms). This suggests some cortical/attentional delay in initiating eye movements, or possibly a central issue.
  • Vertical saccade velocities are mildly reduced, particularly the left eye at 0.3 Hz (168 °/s). Normal vertical saccade velocities are generally ≥200 °/s. This asymmetry (right eye 210 vs left eye 169 °/s) warrants attention.

2. Smooth Pursuit

Direction & FrequencyRight Eye GainLeft Eye Gain
Horizontal 0.2 HzRightward 0.90, Leftward 0.700.95 / 0.72
Horizontal 0.4 HzRightward 0.50, Leftward 0.380.55 / 0.40
Vertical 0.2 HzUpward 0.67, Downward 0.630.77 / 0.64
Vertical 0.4 HzUpward 0.53, Downward 0.480.56 / 0.48
Interpretation:
  • Horizontal pursuit at 0.2 Hz is mildly impaired (leftward gain 0.70/0.72 is below normal; normal gain ≥0.80 is expected at this frequency).
  • Horizontal pursuit at 0.4 Hz is significantly impaired (gains 0.38–0.55; expected ≥0.70 at this frequency). This is a consistent bilateral finding.
  • Vertical pursuit is impaired at both frequencies, with gains in the 0.48–0.77 range — below expected normal (≥0.80 at 0.2 Hz).
  • Bilateral smooth pursuit impairment, affecting both horizontal and vertical planes and worsening at higher frequencies, is a pattern characteristic of central nervous system dysfunction (cerebellum, brainstem, or diffuse cerebral pathology). It can also occur with sedating medications, fatigue, or lack of attention, so clinical correlation is essential.

3. Optokinetic Nystagmus (OKN)

StimulusR Eye GainL Eye Gain
L→R 10°0.940.96 ✓
R→L 10°0.940.96 ✓
Top→Bottom 10°1.030.89
Bottom→Top 10°0.990.98 ✓
L→R 20°0.620.59 ↓
R→L 20°0.530.54 ↓
Top→Bottom 20°0.190.11 ↓↓
Bottom→Top 20°— (no response)
Interpretation:
  • OKN is normal at low velocity (10°) in horizontal and vertical directions.
  • At 20° stimulus velocity, horizontal OKN gains drop significantly (0.53–0.62; normal ≥0.80).
  • Vertical OKN at 20° is severely impaired, especially Top-to-Bottom (0.19/0.11) and Bottom-to-Top (no measurable response).
  • This velocity-dependent OKN impairment mirrors the smooth pursuit findings and again points to central pathway involvement — particularly the parieto-occipital pursuit pathway and/or brainstem/cerebellar circuits.

4. Spontaneous & Gaze Nystagmus

TestFinding
Spontaneous in LightAbsent — normal
Spontaneous in DarkAbsent — normal
High-Frequency Head ShakeAbsent — no head shake nystagmus
Gaze Center/Left/Right/Up/Down (with fixation)Absent nystagmus — all negative
Gaze Left (without fixation)Left eye: SPV 3.00 °/s, amplitude 1.40°, 1.16 Hz — borderline low-grade nystagmus
Gaze Right (without fixation)Left eye: SPV −2.51 °/s, amplitude −3.42°, 0.50 Hz — low-grade nystagmus
Interpretation:
  • No significant spontaneous or gaze-evoked nystagmus is present in light or dark conditions, which is a reassuring finding.
  • The very low-amplitude nystagmus detected in the left eye during eccentric gaze without fixation (SPV < 3 °/s) is of borderline significance. Slow phase velocities < 5–6 °/s in eccentric gaze without fixation are generally considered physiological or of minimal clinical significance.
  • Negative head shake nystagmus argues against a significant unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit at the time of testing.

5. Positional Testing

Dix-Hallpike (for posterior/anterior canal BPPV):

PositionFinding
DHP Right: Sit Head Right (1st)Negative
DHP Right: Supine Head Ext & RightRight eye vertical: SPV −13.78 °/s, amplitude −5.71°, 0.90 Hz ⚠️
DHP Right: Sit Head Right (return)Left eye horizontal: SPV 19.08 °/s, amplitude 7.44°, 1.06 Hz ⚠️
DHP Left: Sit Head Left (1st)Negative
DHP Left: Supine Head Ext & LeftRight eye horizontal: 2.52 °/s; Left eye vertical: −9.05 °/s ⚠️
DHP Left: Sit Head Left (return)Left eye vertical: SPV 26.13 °/s, amplitude 11.61°, 1.03 Hz ⚠️
Key finding: Nystagmus is provoked on both right and left Dix-Hallpike maneuvers — most prominently in the vertical plane during the supine head-extended positions, and in the horizontal plane upon sitting up (reversal/recovery nystagmus). The amplitude and SPV on the left Dix-Hallpike return (26.13 °/s) is clinically significant (>15 °/s).

McClure-Pagnini (for horizontal canal BPPV):

PositionFinding
Sit to SupineNegative
Right LateralNegative
Supine Head Neutral (1st)Negative
Left LateralRight eye vertical: −0.17 °/s (borderline)
Supine Head Neutral (2nd)Left eye vertical: 4.04 °/s, 1.03 Hz ⚠️

Head Position Tests:

PositionFinding
Yaw RightNegative
Yaw LeftLeft eye horizontal: SPV 22.20 °/s, amplitude 5.49°, 1.48 Hz ⚠️
Pitch ForwardNegative
Pitch BackwardNegative
Roll RightNegative
Roll LeftRight eye horizontal: 11.17 °/s; Left eye: 4.50 °/s ⚠️
Interpretation:
  • Positional nystagmus is clearly provoked with Dix-Hallpike maneuvers bilaterally and in specific head positions (Yaw Left, Roll Left).
  • The nystagmus is predominantly vertical and horizontal, appears in multiple positions, and shows reversal on returning to upright — all features that need to be interpreted with the clinical context.
  • The bilateral positional provocation without a clearly lateralized, purely torsional-upbeat pattern that extinguishes within 30–60 seconds makes classical posterior canal BPPV less certain. However, BPPV — particularly canal conversion or bilateral BPPV — remains possible.
  • The pattern of nystagmus provoked in Yaw Left position (horizontal nystagmus, SPV 22 °/s) raises the possibility of horizontal canal BPPV affecting the left side.
  • Central positional nystagmus cannot be excluded given the bilateral involvement, mixed planes, and the concurrent smooth pursuit and OKN impairment.

6. Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV)

ConditionDeviationNormal
Clockwise+5° Right±2–3°
Anticlockwise−9° Left ⚠️±2–3°
Blank background+2° Right±2–3°
Interpretation:
  • The blank background result (+2°) is within normal limits (±2–3°).
  • The −9° anticlockwise deviation is abnormal (normal ≤ ±2.5–3°). Pathological SVV tilt (>3°) suggests utricular dysfunction or involvement of the graviceptive pathway (utricle → inferior vestibular nerve → brainstem).
  • The inconsistency between conditions (clockwise shows 5° vs blank 2°) may reflect attentional variability or a subtle tilt perception deficit that is context-dependent.
  • Abnormal SVV is seen in acute peripheral vestibular lesions (labyrinthitis, vestibular neuritis), otolithic disorders, and brainstem/thalamic lesions.

Summary and Clinical Impression

DomainFindingSignificance
SaccadesMildly prolonged latency; slight vertical asymmetryPossibly central or attentional
Smooth PursuitBilateral impairment, horizontal & verticalCentral pathway concern
OKNNormal at 10°; impaired at 20° (velocity-dependent)Central concern
Spontaneous nystagmusAbsentNormal
Gaze nystagmusMinimal/borderlineNo significant finding
Positional testingBilateral provocation — vertical & horizontal planesLikely positional/BPPV, central cannot be excluded
SVVAbnormal (−9°) in one conditionPossible utricular/otolithic dysfunction

Clinical Impression:

  1. Positional vestibular dysfunction is present, consistent with BPPV — most likely involving the posterior or horizontal canal, possibly bilateral. The dominant side is the left based on Dix-Hallpike left and Yaw Left results.
  2. Smooth pursuit and OKN impairment (bilateral, velocity-dependent) raises a concern for a central vestibular/cerebellar component. This pattern should prompt clinical correlation with symptoms, neurological examination, and consideration of neuroimaging (MRI brain with posterior fossa focus) if not already done.
  3. Abnormal SVV suggests additional utricular (otolithic) pathway involvement.

Recommendations:

  • Canalith Repositioning Maneuver (Epley or Semont) if BPPV is confirmed clinically
  • Neurological evaluation and MRI brain (posterior fossa/cerebellum) given the central pursuit/OKN pattern
  • Vestibular rehabilitation therapy
  • Reassessment of caloric or rotational chair testing if central pathology is suspected

Disclaimer: This interpretation is based solely on the data provided in the VNG report. Final clinical diagnosis must be made by the treating physician with full clinical history, physical examination, and additional investigations as appropriate. The report form itself shows the impression field as blank — a clinician's formal conclusion is still required.

No history of anxiety and depression meds No hearing loss history Loud sound se kaafi problem hai jaise car ka darwaja band hone ki aawaj se irritate hota hai History of spinning Light band hone ke baad chakkar aate hai Karwat change karte waqt chakkar induce ho rhw hai Patient ko aisa lagta hai jaise aaspaas ki cheezein ghum rhi ho Allergy with Strong fragrance pehle mild fragrance jaise cucumber ya muskmelon ki smell se sar dard hota hai History of migraine: more tha 10 or 15 years

Reading File
This is a new patient — Mala Rajodia, Female, 43 years, 22 April 2026 — with a very different and important clinical history than the previous patient. Let me carefully analyze her VNG report in conjunction with her symptoms.
Clinical History (from your message):
  • No anxiety/depression medications
  • No hearing loss history
  • Phonophobia — loud sounds cause irritation (car door slamming)
  • Spinning sensation (vertigo)
  • Dizziness triggered by switching lights off
  • Position change-induced dizziness (turning in bed)
  • Oscillopsia — feels surroundings are spinning (external vertigo)
  • Strong fragrance allergy + headache from even mild fragrances (cucumber/muskmelon smell)
  • Migraine history >10–15 years
Now let me systematically analyze her VNG data:

COMPLETE VNG ANALYSIS — Mala Rajodia, 43F, 22 April 2026


1. SACCADES

Horizontal Saccades:
FrequencyParameterRight EyeLeft EyeNormal
0.3 HzVelocity516.72 °/s528.76 °/s≥200–300 °/s ✅
0.3 HzPrecision59.8354.77≥70 ❌
0.3 HzLatency275.56 ms244.44 ms<250 ms ⚠️ (RE mildly prolonged)
0.45 HzVelocity352.68 °/s377.66 °/s
0.45 HzPrecision46.3648.24≥70 ❌❌
0.45 HzLatency236 ms192 ms
0.6 HzVelocity284.77 °/s379.15 °/s✅ but marked RE-LE asymmetry ⚠️
0.6 HzPrecision41.8635.71❌❌ (severely low)
0.6 HzLatency291.43 ms316.67 ms❌ (both prolonged)
Vertical Saccades:
FrequencyParameterRight EyeLeft EyeNormal
0.3 HzVelocity386.72 °/s303.32 °/s✅ but asymmetry ⚠️
0.3 HzPrecision64.1557.41Borderline/low
0.3 HzLatency283.33 ms266.67 msBorderline ⚠️
0.45 HzVelocity240.33 °/s255.15 °/s
0.45 HzPrecision40.4849.86
0.45 HzLatency285 ms272.5 ms⚠️
0.6 HzVelocity395.49 °/s326.95 °/s✅ but asymmetry ⚠️
0.6 HzPrecision52.7554.10Low
0.6 HzLatency225 ms242.11 ms
Saccade Interpretation:
  • Velocities are generally preserved (no hypometria or hypersaccadia)
  • Precision is globally reduced across all frequencies — this is the dominant finding. Normal precision should be ≥70. Scores of 35–65 indicate dysmetric saccades (mixture of undershooting/overshooting), consistent with cerebellar or pursuit pathway dysfunction
  • Latency prolongation at 0.3 Hz (RE 275 ms) and 0.6 Hz (both eyes 291–316 ms) — indicates delayed saccade initiation, consistent with cortical/frontal lobe or attentional/cerebellar involvement
  • Velocity asymmetry at 0.6 Hz horizontal (RE 284 vs LE 379 °/s) — 25% asymmetry, clinically significant, may suggest right-sided efferent pathway (PPRF/MLF) involvement
  • Vertical saccade velocity asymmetry at 0.3 Hz (RE 386 vs LE 303 °/s) — suggests possible right-eye supranuclear or internuclear pathway advantage

2. SMOOTH PURSUIT

Horizontal:
FrequencyDirectionRight EyeLeft EyeNormal (≥0.70)
0.2 HzRightward0.530.60
0.2 HzLeftward0.730.78
0.4 HzRightward0.220.23❌❌
0.4 HzLeftward0.110.11❌❌
0.6 HzRightward0.150.11❌❌❌
0.6 HzLeftward0.080.14❌❌❌
Vertical:
FrequencyDirectionRight EyeLeft EyeNormal (≥0.70)
0.2 HzUpward0.560.52
0.2 HzDownward0.560.52
0.4 HzUpward0.440.41
0.4 HzDownward0.260.30❌❌
0.6 HzUpward0.400.43❌❌
0.6 HzDownward0.220.22❌❌❌
Smooth Pursuit Interpretation: This is severely abnormal. Key observations:
  • Leftward pursuit at 0.2 Hz is the only near-normal value (0.73–0.78) — all other gains are significantly reduced
  • Progressive deterioration with increasing frequency (velocity) in both planes — classic frequency-dependent pursuit degradation
  • Horizontal rightward pursuit is disproportionately impaired across all frequencies vs. leftward — possible asymmetry implicating contralateral (left) pursuit pathway
  • Vertical downward pursuit is particularly impaired (0.22 at 0.6 Hz) — downward pursuit is mediated by posterior fossa pathways; this raises concern for posterior fossa/cerebellar dysfunction
  • The overall pattern is bilateral, symmetric, frequency-dependent pursuit failure consistent with central vestibular/cerebellar dysfunction, strongly associated with vestibular migraine in this clinical context

3. OPTOKINETIC (OKN) TEST

Horizontal OKN:
SpeedDirectionRE GainLE GainNormal (≥0.70)
10°L→R0.790.81
10°R→L0.930.94
20°L→R0.730.76
20°R→L0.700.77
40°L→R0.570.59⚠️ borderline
40°R→L0.600.66⚠️ borderline
60°L→R0.400.43
60°R→L0.410.39
Vertical OKN:
SpeedDirectionRE GainLE GainNormal
10°T→B0.730.84
10°B→T0.750.75
20°T→B0.16❌❌
20°B→T0.170.20❌❌
40°T→B0.11❌❌❌
40°B→T0.12❌❌❌
60°T→B0.07❌❌❌
60°B→T❌❌❌
OKN Interpretation: This is a highly informative pattern:
  • Horizontal OKN: Normal at low speeds (10–20°), begins to fail at 40°, markedly impaired at 60° — velocity-dependent failure mirroring smooth pursuit
  • Vertical OKN: Catastrophic failure above 10° — even at 20°/s the gain drops to 0.16–0.20, and at 40–60°/s it is essentially absent
  • Fast phase directions noted at 10° T→B (56.67° = oblique), 20° B→T (254–245°), 40° B→T (257°), 60° T→B (116°) — these anomalous fast phase directions (neither purely up nor down) suggest involuntary nystagmus contaminating the OKN response, consistent with central pathway disruption
  • The disproportionate vertical OKN failure compared to horizontal strongly implicates posterior fossa/brainstem-cerebellar pathways (vertical OKN depends on pathways through the pretectum, flocculus, and NOT — nucleus of the optic tract)
  • This pattern is highly characteristic of vestibular migraine with central sensitization

4. SPONTANEOUS / GAZE NYSTAGMUS

Spontaneous nystagmus in light: Absent ✅ Spontaneous nystagmus in dark: Absent ✅ High-frequency head shake nystagmus: Absent ✅ (negative head shake test — argues against significant unilateral peripheral deficit) Hyperventilation nystagmus: Absent ✅
Gaze test (all directions with fixation): All negative — no gaze-evoked nystagmus in center, left, right, up, or down with fixation ✅
Gaze test without fixation (in darkness):
  • Center without fixation: Absent ✅
  • Left without fixation: Very low amplitude, trace activity (scale shows −8°) — borderline, not clearly nystagmus
  • Up without fixation: Absent ✅
  • Right without fixation: Eye shows positional offset (~40–60°) but no clear nystagmus beats recorded
  • Down without fixation: Apparent downward drift/offset visible — no clear nystagmus beats recorded
Gaze Interpretation:
  • No spontaneous, gaze-evoked, or head-shake nystagmus — argues strongly against active unilateral peripheral vestibular lesion (e.g., acute neuritis)
  • The absence of gaze-evoked nystagmus in any direction with fixation is reassuring — no cerebellar floccular failure sign
  • Minor baseline eye position variation without fixation is non-specific

5. POSITIONAL TESTING

Dix-Hallpike (Right side):
  • Sit Head Right → Supine Head Extended Right: No nystagmus recorded (all dashes, SPV —)
  • Return (Supine → Sit Head Right): No nystagmus recorded
Dix-Hallpike (Left side):
  • Sit Head Left (initial, at ~14–38 s timeframe): Vertical nystagmus recorded — Right eye vertical SPV 5.77 °/s, amplitude 4.96°, frequency 0.59 Hz — low-grade vertical nystagmus
  • Supine Head Extended Left: No nystagmus recorded (all dashes)
  • Return (Sit Head Left, second recording): Horizontal + vertical nystagmus — Right eye horizontal SPV 6.44 °/s, amplitude 5.37°; Vertical RE SPV 5.50 °/s, LE SPV 8.48 °/s, amplitude 6.31°; Fast phase direction 320.12° (upward-left); Frequency 1.44 Hz (RE), 0.69 Hz (LE)
McClure-Pagnini (Supine Roll Test):
  • Sit → Supine: No nystagmus ✅
  • Right Lateral: No nystagmus ✅
  • Supine Head Neutral (first): No nystagmus ✅
  • Left Lateral: No nystagmus ✅
  • Supine Head Neutral (second): No nystagmus ✅
Positional Testing Interpretation:
  • Right DHP is completely negative — no posterior or horizontal canal BPPV on the right
  • Left DHP supine position: Negative — the classic torsional upbeat nystagmus of posterior canal BPPV was NOT provoked in the head-down position
  • Left DHP return (sitting back up): Low-amplitude mixed horizontal + vertical nystagmus, SPV 5.50–8.48 °/s with fast phase direction 320° (upward-leftward). This is below the clinical threshold of 15–20 °/s for BPPV and occurs on returning to sitting (not on going down) — this is atypical for classic posterior canal BPPV
  • The low-amplitude, direction-changing, post-repositioning nystagmus is more consistent with central positional nystagmus or a very weak BPPV variant
  • McClure-Pagnini (horizontal canal roll test): Completely negative — no horizontal canal BPPV
  • The positional findings in this patient are significantly less prominent than in the prior patient and do not meet criteria for classic BPPV on either side

6. SUBJECTIVE VISUAL VERTICAL (SVV)

ConditionDeviationNormal
Clockwise90° Right❌❌❌ Massively abnormal
Anticlockwise90° Right❌❌❌ Massively abnormal
Blank Background90° Right❌❌❌ Massively abnormal
SVV Interpretation — Critical Finding: All three SVV trials show a 90° rightward deviation. This is an extraordinary finding — a 90° deviation means the patient set the vertical line completely horizontal (lying on its side).
Normal SVV is ±2° from true vertical. Values beyond ±2.5–3° are abnormal, and values >10° indicate significant otolithic dysfunction.
However, 90° deviation across all conditions (with and without visual context, with clockwise and anticlockwise starting positions) raises the concern that this is a test artifact or patient non-comprehension of the task rather than a true physiological finding. In genuine neurological disease (e.g., acute lateral medullary stroke, severe otolithic dysfunction), SVV deviations are typically 10–20°, rarely exceeding 30°.
Time taken is also notable: 40–53 seconds for a single trial — this is prolonged (normal completion time is 5–15 seconds), suggesting the patient had difficulty understanding or executing the task.
Differential interpretation:
  1. Test validity issue: Patient likely did not understand the SVV task, rotating the bar 90° (to horizontal) instead of finding the vertical. This is the most probable explanation given the magnitude and consistency across all conditions
  2. If genuine: 90° consistently rightward would suggest profound right-sided otolithic (utricular) dysfunction or significant CNS involvement — but this would be expected to correlate with severe spontaneous nystagmus and gait instability, which are absent here
This SVV result should be flagged as likely invalid and the test should be repeated with re-instruction.

CLINICAL CORRELATION WITH SYMPTOMS

SymptomVNG Correlate
Spinning sensationPositional nystagmus (mild), central vestibular dysfunction
Dizziness on light switch-offSudden loss of visual stabilization → uncovers central pursuit/OKN deficit
Dizziness on position change in bedLow-grade positional vestibular sensitivity (left DHP findings)
Oscillopsia (surroundings moving)OKN failure + smooth pursuit failure → unstable gaze stabilization
PhonophobiaClassic migraine feature
Fragrance sensitivity causing headacheOsmophobia — pathognomonic for migraine
>10–15 year migraine historyCentral sensitization, vestibular migraine

INTEGRATED CLINICAL IMPRESSION

Primary Diagnosis: Vestibular Migraine (VM)

This patient's VNG profile is textbook vestibular migraine:
  1. Smooth pursuit failure — bilateral, frequency-dependent, affecting both horizontal and vertical planes — is the single most characteristic VNG finding in VM. It reflects interictal central vestibular pathway dysfunction.
  2. OKN velocity-dependent failure with disproportionate vertical OKN impairment — directly mirrors the smooth pursuit finding and confirms central (not peripheral) pathway involvement.
  3. No significant spontaneous nystagmus — distinguishes from peripheral vestibular disorders and acute cerebellar lesions.
  4. No significant head-shake nystagmus — argues against unilateral peripheral hypofunction.
  5. Saccade precision deficits with frequency-dependent latency prolongation — consistent with cerebellar/brainstem microstructural changes seen in chronic migraineurs.
  6. Mild, low-amplitude positional nystagmus on left DHP return — insufficient for classical BPPV diagnosis; consistent with central positional nystagmus seen in VM.
  7. Negative roll test (McClure-Pagnini) — excludes horizontal canal BPPV.
  8. Clinical history: Long-standing migraine (>10–15 years) + phonophobia + osmophobia (fragrance sensitivity causing headache) + oscillopsia + position-dependent and light-change-related dizziness = Bárány Society criteria for vestibular migraine are met.

Diagnostic Criteria Checklist (International Classification of Vestibular Disorders — ICVD 2012):

  • ✅ At least 5 episodes of vestibular symptoms (moderate or severe intensity, 5 min–72 hrs)
  • ✅ Current or previous history of migraine with or without aura (15+ year history)
  • ✅ One or more migraine features during ≥50% of vestibular episodes (phonophobia, osmophobia/fragrance sensitivity)
  • ✅ Not better explained by another vestibular diagnosis

Secondary Consideration: Superimposed Mild Left-sided Positional Vestibular Sensitivity

  • The low-amplitude nystagmus on left DHP return (SPV 5.77–8.48 °/s, not exceeding 10 °/s) may represent a central positional component of VM rather than true BPPV
  • Cannot fully exclude a very weak posterior canal variant BPPV (left) — though it does not reach diagnostic threshold

RECOMMENDATIONS

Immediate / Clinical

  1. Vestibular Migraine Management should be initiated:
    • Acute: Triptans or ergotamines for acute vestibular migraine attacks
    • Preventive: Propranolol, topiramate, amitriptyline, or valproate (neurology consultation for selection based on contraindications)
    • Lifestyle: Strict migraine trigger avoidance — fragrance-free environment, light regulation, regular sleep schedule, avoid dietary triggers
  2. Fragrance/osmophobia management: Advise avoidance of all strong fragrances; note that even mild organic scents (cucumber, muskmelon) are triggering headache — this level of osmophobia suggests central sensitization and may respond to preventive migraine therapy
  3. Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy (VRT): Indicated for the interictal central pursuit/OKN deficits and oscillopsia. Gaze stabilization exercises are particularly useful in VM.
  4. Canalith Repositioning (Epley/Semont): Not indicated in this case — the positional findings do not meet BPPV diagnostic criteria. Performing Epley in a vestibular migraine patient without confirmed BPPV may worsen symptoms.
  5. Light adaptation strategies: Gradual light transitions rather than sudden light switches; may benefit from filtered lighting

Investigations

  1. MRI Brain with posterior fossa protocol (gadolinium): Recommended given central pursuit/OKN findings — to exclude posterior fossa pathology (though VM is the most likely diagnosis)
  2. Neurology/Headache specialist referral: For migraine classification, preventive therapy optimization
  3. SVV repeat: After proper patient instruction — current result is likely invalid
  4. Caloric testing (bithermal): Optional — to quantify any underlying peripheral vestibular asymmetry if treatment response is poor

SUMMARY TABLE

DomainFindingSignificance
SaccadesGlobally low precision; frequency-dependent latency prolongation; velocity asymmetry at 0.6 HzCentral vestibular dysfunction, cerebellar microstructural
Smooth PursuitSeverely impaired at all frequencies; bilateral; vertical downward worstPrimary central finding — vestibular migraine
OKNHorizontal: normal at 10–20°, impaired at 60°; Vertical: catastrophic failure above 10°Central pathway, posterior fossa involvement
Spontaneous/Gaze NystagmusAbsentAgainst peripheral/acute central lesion
Head Shake NystagmusAbsentAgainst significant unilateral peripheral deficit
DHP RightNegativeNo right-sided BPPV
DHP LeftLow-amplitude nystagmus on return only (SPV <10°/s)Below BPPV threshold; central positional
Roll TestNegative bilaterallyNo horizontal canal BPPV
SVV90° deviation (all conditions)Likely test artifact / patient non-comprehension — repeat required
Clinical HistoryMigraine 15+ years, phonophobia, osmophobia, oscillopsia, position-change dizzinessFulfills vestibular migraine ICVD criteria
Overall Impression: Vestibular Migraine (primary diagnosis) with central vestibular pathway involvement manifesting as bilateral smooth pursuit failure and OKN deficits. No BPPV. SVV result requires repeat testing with proper instruction.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.