Make a academic correct PPT for ms orthopaedic conference with eloborate surgical procedure and images
BDSF biplane double supported screw fixation femoral neck fracture surgical technique images
femoral neck fracture Garden classification cannulated screw fixation X-ray images orthopaedic
BDSF vs CFIX FNF Conference
Presentation · PPTX
| Slide | Content |
|---|---|
| 1 | Title slide - Study title, authors, 4 headline stats in a banner bar |
| 2 | Introduction - "Unsolved fracture" problem statement, CFIX failure rates, BDSF rationale |
| 3 | Anatomy & Biomechanics - Calcar anatomy, vascular supply, Pauwels classification + Garden classification image |
| 4 | BDSF Principle - 3-diverging-screw construct, calcar double-support, +44% fixation strength + BDSF technique image |
| 5 | Pre-operative Planning - Indications, contraindications, positioning, fracture reduction (Whitman/Leadbetter/Smith-Peterson) |
| 6 | BDSF - Detailed Surgical Steps (6 steps) - Entry point coordinates, guide-wire angles (150-165° distal, 135-140° middle, cranial), drilling technique, "V" on lateral / "F" on AP verification |
| 7 | CFIX Surgical Steps (6 steps) - Inverted triangle configuration, screw length measurement, lag compression technique |
| 8 | Clinical Case: CFIX - 48M Garden III, full radiological series (actual PDF Fig 1 images embedded) |
| 9 | Clinical Case: BDSF - 57M Garden IV, full radiological series (actual PDF Fig 2 images embedded) |
| 10 | Methodology - Study design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, outcome measures (HHS + serial X-rays) |
| 11 | Demographics table - Full baseline comparison, highlighted significant difference in incision length |
| 12 | Functional Outcomes (HHS) - Large-format score comparisons at 1M, 3M, 6M with significance flags |
| 13 | Radiological Outcomes - 93.33% vs 90% union rates, 12.55 vs 14.68 weeks, LLD comparison |
| 14 | Complications table - All 7 complication types, management, + (Fig 3 images embedded) |
| 15 | Discussion - 6 key discussion points contextualising against published literature |
| 16 | Limitations & Future Directions - 5 limitations + 5 future research directions |
| 17 | Conclusion (dark slide) - 5 numbered, colour-coded take-home messages |
| 18 | References - 12 key citations in two-column layout |
Kindly modify above slide following
Slide 1 - only title with presenter name
BDSF vs CFIX FNF Conference
Presentation · PPTX