Based on your KMTC Zone 7 Final Research timetable, here is a complete question bank covering all 11 session topics.
KMTC Research Methods — Complete Question Bank
MCQs | SAQs | LAQs | Application Questions
Based on FINAL RESE…ZONE 7 Timetable Topics
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SESSION 1 & 2: CONCEPTS OF RESEARCH
(Definition, Purpose, Importance, Characteristics, Types, Approaches, Epidemiology)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
MCQs
1. Which of the following BEST defines research?
- A. Collecting opinions from colleagues
- B. A systematic, empirical and critical investigation of phenomena to generate new knowledge
- C. Reading and summarising textbook content
- D. Searching the internet for health information
✅ Answer: B — Research must be systematic, empirical, and critical — not just information gathering.
2. Research that starts with a general observation and moves to a specific conclusion is called:
- A. Deductive reasoning
- B. Inductive reasoning
- C. Predictive research
- D. Analytical research
✅ Answer: B — Inductive = specific observations → general conclusions. Deductive = general theory → specific predictions.
3. Research that begins with a theory or hypothesis and tests it with specific data is:
- A. Inductive
- B. Exploratory
- C. Deductive
- D. Descriptive
✅ Answer: C — Deductive reasoning moves from the general (theory) to the specific (observation/test).
4. Which type of research describes what EXISTS without manipulating variables?
- A. Experimental
- B. Predictive
- C. Descriptive
- D. Analytical
✅ Answer: C — Descriptive research documents current phenomena as they are — prevalence surveys, case series.
5. A study that examines the relationship between variables and tries to explain WHY something occurs is:
- A. Exploratory
- B. Descriptive
- C. Predictive
- D. Analytical
✅ Answer: D — Analytical research goes beyond description to explore associations and causal relationships.
6. Epidemiology is BEST defined as:
- A. The study of drugs and their effects on the body
- B. The study of distribution and determinants of disease in populations
- C. The study of bacteria causing infections
- D. The clinical management of infectious diseases
✅ Answer: B — Epidemiology studies WHO gets disease, WHERE, WHEN, and WHY — distribution and determinants.
7. Mixed methods research combines:
- A. Inductive and deductive reasoning only
- B. Basic and applied research
- C. Quantitative and qualitative approaches
- D. Descriptive and experimental designs
✅ Answer: C — Mixed methods integrates both numerical (quantitative) and experiential (qualitative) data in a single study.
8. Which of the following is NOT a purpose of research in healthcare?
- A. Improving clinical practice
- B. Generating profit for hospitals
- C. Informing health policy
- D. Discovering new treatments
✅ Answer: B — Research purposes include improving practice, informing policy, and building knowledge — not profit generation.
Short Answer Questions (SAQs)
9. Define research and state FOUR characteristics of good research. (5 marks)
Model Answer:
Definition: Research is a systematic, controlled, empirical, and critical investigation of phenomena, guided by theory or hypotheses, about presumed relations among such phenomena.
Four characteristics:
- Systematic — follows a structured, planned process
- Empirical — based on observable evidence, not opinion
- Objective — free from personal bias
- Replicable — can be repeated by other researchers and yield similar results
(Also acceptable: ethical, valid, reliable)
10. Distinguish between inductive and deductive reasoning in research. (4 marks)
Model Answer:
- Inductive reasoning: Moves from specific observations to broad generalisations. Researcher collects data first, then develops a theory. Common in qualitative research. Example: Observing that several malnourished children come from households without latrines → concluding poor sanitation contributes to malnutrition.
- Deductive reasoning: Starts with an existing theory or hypothesis, then collects data to test it. Common in quantitative research. Example: Hypothesising that exclusive breastfeeding reduces diarrhoea, then testing this in a study.
11. List FIVE types of research and give ONE example of each relevant to healthcare. (5 marks)
Model Answer:
| Type | Healthcare Example |
|---|
| Exploratory | Preliminary study on factors affecting vaccine uptake in a new county |
| Descriptive | Prevalence survey of hypertension in adults in Nairobi |
| Analytical | Case-control study on risk factors for cervical cancer |
| Predictive | Study predicting diabetes risk based on BMI and family history |
| Experimental/Applied | RCT testing a new wound dressing for diabetic foot ulcers |
Application Question
12. A nurse at Kakamega County Hospital notices that many patients are readmitted within 30 days of discharge. She wants to investigate this problem.
(a) What type of research (by purpose) would be MOST appropriate to first explore this problem? Justify your answer. (3 marks)
(b) What research approach (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods) would best capture both the rate of readmission AND patients' reasons for readmission? Explain. (3 marks)
Model Answer:
(a) Exploratory research — because the problem is not well understood yet. There is no established theory about WHY readmissions are occurring, so an exploratory approach would first describe the scope of the problem and identify potential contributing factors before a more focused study is designed.
(b) Mixed methods — quantitative component would measure the readmission rate (numbers, percentages, demographics) while the qualitative component (interviews/focus groups) would explore patients' lived experiences, barriers to follow-up, and reasons for returning. Using only one approach would miss either the scale or the depth of the problem.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SESSION 2–3: RESEARCH PROBLEM
(Gaps, Topic ID, Background, Problem Statement, Justification, Research Questions, Objectives, Hypothesis, Limitations, Scope, Conceptual Framework)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
MCQs
13. The section of a research proposal that explains WHY the study is important and who will benefit is the:
- A. Background
- B. Methodology
- C. Justification/Rationale
- D. Literature review
✅ Answer: C — Justification/rationale demonstrates the significance of the study and its potential impact on health practice or policy.
14. A research gap is BEST described as:
- A. A mistake found in a previous study
- B. An area where knowledge is absent, insufficient, or contradictory
- C. The difference between two studies' sample sizes
- D. The time between two research publications
✅ Answer: B — A research gap is the space between what is known and what needs to be known — it justifies conducting a new study.
15. "To determine the prevalence of anaemia among pregnant women attending ANC at Kisii Level 5 Hospital" is an example of a:
- A. Research problem
- B. Research hypothesis
- C. Research objective
- D. Conceptual framework
✅ Answer: C — Research objectives are specific, measurable, action-oriented statements of what the study intends to achieve. They begin with action verbs: determine, assess, compare, establish.
16. Which of the following is an example of a NULL hypothesis?
- A. Hand hygiene training will reduce HAIs by 30%
- B. There is a significant association between smoking and lung cancer
- C. There is no significant difference in recovery time between patients on drug A and drug B
- D. Patients who exercise have better glycaemic control
✅ Answer: C — H₀ always states NO difference, NO effect, NO association. The researcher tries to disprove it.
17. The conceptual framework in a research proposal:
- A. Lists all the references cited in the study
- B. Shows the statistical tests that will be used
- C. Diagrammatically illustrates the relationship between study variables
- D. Describes the sampling procedure
✅ Answer: C — A conceptual framework is a visual or narrative model showing how independent, dependent, and confounding variables relate to each other in the study.
18. Assumptions in research are:
- A. Errors made during data collection
- B. Conditions the researcher accepts as true without testing
- C. Limitations caused by small sample size
- D. Hypotheses that have been proven
✅ Answer: B — Assumptions are things the researcher takes for granted without verification, e.g., assuming respondents answered honestly.
SAQs
19. State the components of a well-written research problem statement. (5 marks)
Model Answer:
- Background context — what is the current situation / what is known
- Magnitude of the problem — data showing the extent of the problem (statistics, rates)
- The specific gap — what is NOT yet known or not documented locally
- Consequences — what happens if the problem is not addressed
- Proposed solution — what the study intends to investigate
20. Differentiate between research objectives and research questions, giving ONE example of each. (4 marks)
Model Answer:
- Research objective: A declarative statement of what the study will achieve. Begins with an action verb. Example: "To assess factors associated with non-adherence to ART among HIV-positive adults at Mombasa County Hospital."
- Research question: An interrogative (question) form of the objective. Example: "What factors are associated with non-adherence to ART among HIV-positive adults at Mombasa County Hospital?"
Both cover the same content — objectives are stated as intentions; questions are stated as inquiries.
21. Explain the purpose of a conceptual framework in research. (3 marks)
Model Answer:
A conceptual framework:
- Visually represents the relationship between the independent variable(s), dependent variable(s), and any intervening/confounding variables
- Guides the researcher on what to measure and how variables interact
- Provides a theoretical basis for the study, linking it to existing knowledge and making the research logic clear to the reader
Application Question
22. You are a clinical officer student at KMTC Eldoret. You have observed that many diabetic patients at the local health centre have poorly controlled blood sugar despite attending clinic regularly.
(a) Write a problem statement for this observation. (3 marks)
(b) State ONE general objective and TWO specific objectives. (3 marks)
(c) Write ONE null and ONE alternative hypothesis. (2 marks)
(d) Identify TWO possible limitations of your proposed study. (2 marks)
Model Answer:
(a) Despite regular clinic attendance, a significant proportion of diabetic patients at [Name] Health Centre continue to have poorly controlled blood glucose levels (HbA1c >7%). The specific factors contributing to this poor glycaemic control have not been documented at this facility.
(b)
- General objective: To determine factors associated with poor glycaemic control among diabetic patients attending [Name] Health Centre.
- Specific objective 1: To assess dietary practices among diabetic patients at the health centre.
- Specific objective 2: To determine the level of physical activity among diabetic patients at the health centre.
(c)
- H₀: There is no significant association between dietary practices and glycaemic control among diabetic patients at the health centre.
- H₁: There is a significant association between dietary practices and glycaemic control among diabetic patients at the health centre.
(d)
- Self-reporting bias — patients may over-report adherence to diet/medication
- Small sample size at a single facility limits generalisability of findings
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SESSION 4–6: REVIEW OF LITERATURE
(Primary & Secondary Sources, Steps, Characteristics, Citation & Referencing Software)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
MCQs
23. A PRIMARY source of literature is:
- A. A textbook summarising several studies
- B. A review article synthesising previous work
- C. An original research article published by the researcher who conducted the study
- D. A newspaper report about a health study
✅ Answer: C — Primary sources are original, first-hand accounts: journal articles, theses, conference papers. Secondary sources interpret or summarise primary sources.
24. Which of the following is a SECONDARY source of literature?
- A. Original research article in The Lancet
- B. A PhD thesis
- C. A systematic review article
- D. Government surveillance data (primary collection)
✅ Answer: C — Systematic reviews synthesise findings from multiple primary studies — they are secondary sources.
25. The FIRST step in conducting a literature review is:
- A. Writing the review
- B. Searching databases
- C. Defining keywords and search terms
- D. Critically appraising articles
✅ Answer: C — You must define your search terms first before you can search databases effectively.
26. Which referencing management software is commonly used to organise citations?
- A. SPSS
- B. Mendeley / Zotero / EndNote
- C. EpiInfo
- D. Microsoft Excel
✅ Answer: B — Mendeley, Zotero, and EndNote are citation/reference management tools. SPSS and EpiInfo are statistical/data software.
27. In APA 7th edition, the correct format for a journal article reference is:
- A. Author (Year). Title. Journal, Volume(Issue), pages.
- B. Title. Author. Journal. Year. Pages.
- C. [Number] Author. Title. Journal Year; Volume: pages.
- D. Author — Title — Year — Journal — Pages.
✅ Answer: A — APA format: Author, A. A. (Year). Title of article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page–page. Vancouver uses numbered format [C].
28. A characteristic of GOOD literature used in research is:
- A. Published more than 20 years ago
- B. From a blog or unverified website
- C. Peer-reviewed, current (within 10 years), and relevant to the topic
- D. Written in any language regardless of translation accuracy
✅ Answer: C — Good literature is peer-reviewed, recent (ideally within 5–10 years), from credible sources, and directly relevant to the research topic.
SAQs
29. State FIVE steps for conducting a literature review. (5 marks)
Model Answer:
- Identify and define keywords/search terms related to the research topic
- Search relevant databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, HINARI, WHO IRIS, MoH Kenya)
- Screen titles and abstracts for relevance
- Critically appraise selected full-text articles for quality and relevance
- Synthesise findings and write the review, linking evidence to the research problem
30. Distinguish between primary and secondary sources of literature. Give TWO examples of each. (4 marks)
Model Answer:
| Definition | Examples |
|---|
| Primary | Original, first-hand research accounts | 1. Original journal article 2. PhD/MSc thesis |
| Secondary | Interprets or summarises primary sources | 1. Systematic review/meta-analysis 2. Textbook chapter |
Application Question
31. A KMTC student is writing the literature review section of her research proposal on "Factors influencing postnatal care attendance in rural Kenya."
(a) List FOUR databases or sources she should search. (2 marks)
(b) Give FOUR keywords she should use in her search. (2 marks)
(c) State THREE characteristics of good literature she should look for when selecting articles. (3 marks)
(d) Write a correct APA in-text citation for a 2021 article by Wanjiru and Odhiambo. (1 mark)
Model Answer:
(a) PubMed / MEDLINE; Google Scholar; WHO IRIS; HINARI; African Journals Online (AJOL); MoH Kenya reports
(b) "Postnatal care," "PNC attendance," "maternal health Kenya," "rural health-seeking behaviour," "postnatal follow-up"
(c) 1. Peer-reviewed (published in a credible journal) 2. Current (published within the last 10 years) 3. Relevant to the topic (postnatal care/Kenya/Africa) 4. From a credible, identifiable author/institution
(d) (Wanjiru & Odhiambo, 2021)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SESSION 7–8: RESEARCH METHODS
(Study Designs, Study Area, Target Population, Sample Size, Sampling Frame, Sampling Techniques, Data Collection, Instruments, Pilot Study, Validity, Reliability, Data Entry, Analysis, Discussion, Conclusion)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
MCQs
32. The list of all individuals from whom a sample can be drawn is called the:
- A. Target population
- B. Sampling frame
- C. Accessible population
- D. Study unit
✅ Answer: B — The sampling frame is the actual list used to select the sample (e.g., clinic register, electoral roll). Without it, random sampling is impossible.
33. A researcher conducts a small-scale preliminary study on 10 participants to test the questionnaire before the main study. This is called a:
- A. Census
- B. Cohort sub-study
- C. Pilot study
- D. Feasibility trial
✅ Answer: C — A pilot study tests the instrument and procedure on a small subset to identify problems before the main study — saves time and resources.
34. Which formula is commonly used to determine sample size when population size is KNOWN?
- A. Fisher's formula
- B. Yamane's formula
- C. Cohen's d
- D. Cronbach's alpha
✅ Answer: B — Yamane's formula: n = N / (1 + N(e²)) is used for known finite populations. Fisher's formula is used when population size is unknown or very large.
35. Internal consistency of a research instrument is measured by:
- A. Pearson's r
- B. Cronbach's alpha
- C. Chi-square
- D. p-value
✅ Answer: B — Cronbach's alpha measures how consistently a multi-item scale measures the same construct. A value ≥0.7 is generally acceptable.
36. A researcher administers the same questionnaire to the same group twice, two weeks apart, and compares scores. This tests:
- A. Content validity
- B. Construct validity
- C. Test-retest reliability
- D. Inter-rater reliability
✅ Answer: C — Test-retest reliability assesses temporal stability — whether the instrument gives consistent results over time.
37. In a research report, the section where findings are compared to previous studies and interpreted is called:
- A. Results
- B. Methodology
- C. Discussion
- D. Conclusion
✅ Answer: C — The Discussion interprets what the results mean, compares them to existing literature, explains unexpected findings, and acknowledges limitations.
38. Which data collection instrument is MOST appropriate for a study on nurses' attitudes towards end-of-life care?
- A. Laboratory test
- B. Observation checklist
- C. Structured questionnaire with Likert scale
- D. Document review guide
✅ Answer: C — Attitudes are best measured using validated scales with Likert-type responses (Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree).
SAQs
39. Distinguish between validity and reliability of a research instrument. (4 marks)
Model Answer:
| Definition | How tested |
|---|
| Validity | The extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure | Content validity (expert review), criterion validity (comparison to gold standard) |
| Reliability | The extent to which an instrument gives consistent results on repeated use | Test-retest, inter-rater reliability, Cronbach's alpha |
| Key point: An instrument can be reliable without being valid, but a valid instrument must also be reliable. | | |
40. State the purpose of a pilot study and list FOUR things it helps the researcher to assess. (5 marks)
Model Answer:
Purpose: To pre-test the research instrument and data collection procedure on a small sample before the main study to identify and correct problems.
Four things assessed:
- Clarity and comprehensibility of questions
- Time required to complete the instrument
- Validity and reliability of the instrument
- Logistical challenges (access to participants, data entry process)
41. Describe the steps in the data collection process. (6 marks)
Model Answer:
- Obtain ethical clearance — from IRB/KEMRI before any data collection
- Train research assistants — standardise administration of instruments
- Conduct pilot study — pre-test instrument; make corrections
- Obtain informed consent — from all participants before collecting data
- Administer instruments — questionnaires, interviews, observations per protocol
- Edit collected data daily — check for completeness and accuracy in the field
Application Question
42. A KMTC student wants to study "Knowledge of malaria prevention among secondary school students in Bungoma County." There are 5,000 students in 10 schools in the county.
(a) Identify the target population and suggest an appropriate sampling technique. (3 marks)
(b) If using Yamane's formula with a 5% margin of error, calculate the sample size.
(Formula: n = N / (1 + N(e²))) (3 marks)
(c) State the data collection instrument you would use and justify your choice. (2 marks)
(d) How would you ensure the instrument is valid and reliable? (2 marks)
Model Answer:
(a) Target population = all 5,000 secondary school students in Bungoma County. Appropriate technique = Cluster sampling (schools as clusters, then stratified/random sampling within schools) OR Stratified random sampling (stratify by school, then randomly sample from each).
(b) n = 5,000 / (1 + 5,000 × (0.05)²)
= 5,000 / (1 + 5,000 × 0.0025)
= 5,000 / (1 + 12.5)
= 5,000 / 13.5
= 370 students
(c) Self-administered structured questionnaire. Justification: Students are literate; questionnaire is efficient for large samples; allows respondents to answer sensitive questions (e.g., sexual practices) in private; standardised responses allow easy quantitative analysis.
(d) Validity: Submit instrument to research supervisors/content experts for review (content validity). Reliability: Conduct a pilot study on 10% of sample size from a similar school not in the study; calculate test-retest reliability or Cronbach's alpha; revise ambiguous items.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SESSION 9: RESEARCH ETHICS & PROPOSAL FORMAT
(History, Principles, Research Fraud, Ethical Considerations, Concept Paper, Proposal, Dissertation Format — KMTC Guidelines)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
MCQs
43. The Belmont Report (1979) identified THREE core ethical principles for research. Which of the following is NOT one of them?
- A. Respect for persons
- B. Beneficence
- C. Veracity
- D. Justice
✅ Answer: C — Belmont Report = Respect for Persons (autonomy), Beneficence, Justice. Veracity (truthfulness) is a bioethical principle but not part of the Belmont Report.
44. Fabricating or falsifying research data is an example of:
- A. Research limitation
- B. Sampling bias
- C. Research fraud/misconduct
- D. Informed consent violation
✅ Answer: C — Research fraud includes fabrication (making up data), falsification (altering data), and plagiarism (FFP) — all serious violations of research integrity.
45. The document that outlines the purpose, methodology, budget, and timeline of a proposed study BEFORE it is conducted is called:
- A. Research dissertation
- B. Research report
- C. Research proposal
- D. Concept paper
✅ Answer: C — A research proposal is the detailed plan submitted for ethical approval and funding. A concept paper is a shorter, preliminary document. A dissertation is the final completed study.
46. A concept paper differs from a full research proposal in that it is:
- A. Longer and more detailed
- B. A shorter, preliminary document that introduces the research idea
- C. Submitted after data collection
- D. Only required for PhD studies
✅ Answer: B — A concept paper (2–5 pages) is a brief overview to introduce the research idea to supervisors or funders. A full proposal is 10–30+ pages with complete methodology and budget.
47. The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) primarily governs:
- A. Statistical analysis in clinical trials
- B. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects
- C. Funding of health research in Africa
- D. Publication standards for medical journals
✅ Answer: B — The Declaration of Helsinki is a foundational document by the World Medical Association setting ethical standards for research involving humans, especially clinical trials.
48. Which of the following BEST describes voluntary participation in research?
- A. Participants are paid to take part
- B. Participants join only because their doctor told them to
- C. Participants freely choose to join after receiving full information, with the right to withdraw at any time
- D. Participation is compulsory for all eligible individuals
✅ Answer: C — Voluntary participation means informed, uncoerced consent with the freedom to withdraw at any point without penalty.
SAQs
49. State FIVE ethical considerations a researcher must observe when conducting research involving human participants. (5 marks)
Model Answer:
- Informed consent — participants must be fully informed and voluntarily agree to participate
- Confidentiality — personal information must not be disclosed; use codes instead of names
- Anonymity — where possible, participants' identities should not be traceable
- Right to withdraw — participants can leave the study at any time without penalty
- Ethical approval — study must be approved by a recognised ethics committee (KEMRI/NACOSTI/institutional IRB) before commencing
50. Outline the standard format of a KMTC research proposal. (8 marks)
Model Answer:
Preliminary pages: Title page, Declaration, Dedication, Acknowledgements, Table of Contents, List of Tables/Figures, Abstract, Abbreviations
| Chapter | Content |
|---|
| Chapter 1 | Introduction: background, problem statement, research questions, objectives, hypothesis, justification, scope, limitations, assumptions, conceptual framework, operational definitions |
| Chapter 2 | Literature Review: thematic review of primary and secondary sources |
| Chapter 3 | Methodology: research design, study area, target population, sampling frame, sample size, sampling technique, data collection instruments, pilot study, validity/reliability, data collection procedure, data analysis plan, ethical considerations |
| References | All cited sources in APA/Vancouver format |
| Appendices | Questionnaire/instruments, informed consent form, budget, work plan/Gantt chart, introductory letter |
51. Define research fraud and list THREE forms it can take. (4 marks)
Model Answer:
Research fraud (misconduct) is deliberate violation of research integrity through dishonest practices that compromise the validity and trustworthiness of research findings.
Three forms:
- Fabrication — inventing/making up data or results that were never collected
- Falsification — manipulating, altering, or omitting data to change research outcomes
- Plagiarism — using another person's ideas, data, or writing without proper attribution
Application Question (LAQ)
52. (Long Answer — 15 marks)
You are a final-year Clinical Medicine student at KMTC. You have been asked to write a research proposal on: "Factors associated with high defaulter rates among tuberculosis patients at a district hospital in Western Kenya."
(a) Write a suitable title, background, and problem statement for this proposal. (4 marks)
(b) State ONE general objective and THREE specific objectives. (4 marks)
(c) Describe the methodology you would use, including: design, population, sampling technique, sample size approach, and instrument. (5 marks)
(d) State TWO ethical considerations relevant to this study. (2 marks)
Model Answer:
(a)
Title: Factors Associated with Tuberculosis Treatment Default among Patients Attending [Name] District Hospital, Western Kenya: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health concern in Kenya, ranking among the top 10 causes of death. The WHO END TB Strategy targets treatment success rates of ≥90%. However, treatment default — defined as interruption of treatment for ≥2 consecutive months — remains a significant barrier. In Western Kenya, default rates at district facilities have been reported at 15–30%, well above the national target of <5%. Factors such as poverty, distance to facility, drug side effects, and stigma have been implicated but are poorly documented at district level.
Problem Statement: Despite free TB treatment provided under the national DLTLD programme, high default rates persist at [Name] District Hospital, compromising treatment outcomes and contributing to drug resistance. The specific factors driving this default have not been studied at this facility.
(b)
General Objective: To determine factors associated with TB treatment default among patients at [Name] District Hospital.
Specific Objectives:
- To assess socio-demographic characteristics of TB patients who defaulted treatment
- To identify patient-related factors (knowledge, side effects, stigma) associated with default
- To determine health system factors (distance, drug availability, staff attitude) associated with default
(c)
Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study — appropriate for determining prevalence and associated factors at one point in time.
Population: All TB patients enrolled in the hospital's TB register in the past 2 years (defaulters and non-defaulters).
Sampling: Systematic random sampling from the TB register — every 2nd patient selected until sample size is reached.
Sample size: Yamane's formula or Fisher's formula based on estimated 25% default rate, 95% confidence level.
Instrument: Interviewer-administered structured questionnaire covering demographics, treatment history, knowledge, side effects, and health system factors. Records review for treatment outcomes.
(d)
- Informed consent — patients (defaulters) must be informed of the study purpose and voluntarily agree; no coercion since they fear penalties for default
- Confidentiality — TB patient data is sensitive; identifiers must be removed; data stored securely; findings reported in aggregate form
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SESSION 10: RESEARCH SUPERVISION & DISSEMINATION
(PowerPoint Presentation, Role of Supervisor, Role of Student, Progress Tracking)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
MCQs
53. The PRIMARY role of a research supervisor is to:
- A. Conduct the research on behalf of the student
- B. Guide, mentor, and provide academic direction to the student researcher
- C. Write the research proposal for the student
- D. Approve funding for the study
✅ Answer: B — The supervisor guides — not does. The student is responsible for conducting the research; the supervisor provides academic mentorship and feedback.
54. When presenting research findings using PowerPoint, slides should be:
- A. Filled with as much text as possible for completeness
- B. Concise, with key points, visuals, and minimal text
- C. Read word-for-word from the research report
- D. Used only for the methodology section
✅ Answer: B — Good presentation slides follow the rule: key points only, supported by visuals/graphs. The presenter elaborates verbally — slides are not read aloud.
55. A student's responsibilities during the research process include all EXCEPT:
- A. Meeting supervision deadlines
- B. Collecting and analysing data independently
- C. Choosing supervisors' research topics for them
- D. Seeking feedback and incorporating corrections
✅ Answer: C — Students select their OWN research topics (with guidance). Supervisors do not impose topics, and students do not choose topics for supervisors.
SAQ
56. State FOUR roles of a research supervisor and FOUR responsibilities of a student during the research process. (8 marks)
Model Answer:
Supervisor's roles:
- Provide academic and methodological guidance throughout the research process
- Review and give written feedback on proposal, chapters, and final dissertation
- Advise on ethical issues, analysis, and interpretation of findings
- Track student progress and ensure adherence to timelines
Student's responsibilities:
- Identify a research problem and develop the proposal independently
- Meet supervision appointments and deadlines
- Conduct data collection, entry, and analysis as planned
- Incorporate supervisor's feedback and submit revised work promptly
Application Question
57. You have completed your KMTC research project and must present findings to your class.
(a) List FIVE key slides that should be included in your research presentation. (5 marks)
(b) State THREE tips for delivering an effective research presentation. (3 marks)
Model Answer:
(a) 1. Title slide (title, author, institution, date)
2. Introduction/Background & Problem Statement
3. Objectives & Methodology (brief)
4. Key Results/Findings (tables, charts)
5. Discussion, Conclusions & Recommendations
(b) 1. Speak clearly and at a moderate pace — face the audience, not the screen
2. Keep slides simple: use bullet points, graphs, and visuals rather than dense text
3. Practice beforehand and stay within the allotted time; be prepared for questions
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
COMPREHENSIVE LONG ANSWER QUESTIONS (LAQs)
Full exam-style — 20 marks each
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
58. (20 marks)
(a) Define research and explain FIVE types of research relevant to clinical medicine, giving one example of each. (10 marks)
(b) Describe the complete research process from problem identification to dissemination of findings. (10 marks)
59. (20 marks)
(a) Explain the following sampling methods, stating their advantages and disadvantages: (i) Simple random sampling (ii) Stratified random sampling (iii) Purposive sampling (iv) Cluster sampling. (12 marks)
(b) A researcher wants to study hypertension prevalence in a town of 10,000 adults. Using Yamane's formula with a 5% margin of error, calculate the required sample size and describe how you would select participants using systematic sampling. (8 marks)
Model Answer (b):
n = 10,000 / (1 + 10,000 × 0.05²)
= 10,000 / (1 + 10,000 × 0.0025)
= 10,000 / (1 + 25)
= 10,000 / 26
= 385 participants
Systematic sampling: Obtain a complete register of the 10,000 adults (sampling frame). Calculate the sampling interval: k = N/n = 10,000/385 ≈ 26. Randomly select a starting point between 1 and 26 (e.g., No. 14). Then select every 26th person thereafter: 14, 40, 66, 92... until 385 are selected.
60. (20 marks)
(a) Describe the ethical principles governing health research and explain how each applies in a clinical research setting. (10 marks)
(b) Outline the complete format of a KMTC research dissertation, explaining the content of each chapter. (10 marks)
📋 QUESTION BANK SUMMARY
| Section | MCQs | SAQs | LAQs | Application Qs |
|---|
| Concepts of Research | 8 | 3 | — | 1 |
| Research Problem | 6 | 3 | — | 1 |
| Literature Review | 6 | 2 | — | 1 |
| Research Methods | 7 | 3 | — | 1 |
| Ethics & Proposal Format | 6 | 3 | 1 | — |
| Supervision & Presentation | 3 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Comprehensive LAQs | — | — | 3 | — |
| TOTAL | 36 | 15 | 4 | 5 |
Exam strategy: LAQs in KMTC research exams almost always ask you to either (1) write/critique a research proposal section, (2) calculate sample size, or (3) describe ethical principles with application to a clinical scenario. Master those three and you cover the highest-mark territory.