Good. I have enough to give you complete, accurate answers for all 5 topics. Here they are:
TOPIC 11: INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
Q: Difference between mechanical and paralytic ileus?
| Feature | Mechanical Obstruction | Paralytic Ileus |
|---|
| Cause | Physical block (adhesion, hernia, tumor) | No peristalsis (post-op, peritonitis, electrolyte imbalance) |
| Bowel sounds | High-pitched, tinkling, borborygmi | Absent / silent abdomen |
| Onset of pain | Colicky, intermittent | Constant, dull distension |
| Distension | In the segment above block | Generalised - all bowel |
| X-ray | Air-fluid levels with cut-off point | Generalised gas throughout small + large bowel |
| Treatment | Surgery (often) | Conservative - treat cause |
Q: Simple vs. strangulated obstruction?
| Simple Obstruction | Strangulated Obstruction |
|---|
| Blood supply | Intact | Compromised |
| Features | Colicky pain, vomiting, distension | Severe constant pain + features of above + fever, tachycardia, peritonism |
| Tenderness | Minimal | Localised severe tenderness |
| Urgency | May observe initially | Surgical emergency |
| Risk | Low | High mortality if delayed |
Q: What is a closed-loop obstruction? Why is it dangerous?
A segment of bowel is blocked at two points simultaneously (like a loop of sigmoid in volvulus, or an internal hernia), so:
- Gas and secretions accumulate with NO outlet
- Pressure rises rapidly → venous obstruction → ischaemia → gangrene → perforation
- No decompression possible by vomiting
- High risk of rapid progression to perforation
Example: Sigmoid volvulus, caecal volvulus, internal hernia
Q: Common causes of SBO vs. LBO?
| Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO) | Large Bowel Obstruction (LBO) |
|---|
| Adhesions (most common, post-op) | Carcinoma of colon (most common) |
| Inguinal hernia | Sigmoid volvulus |
| Intussusception (children) | Diverticular stricture |
| Crohn's disease stricture | Faecal impaction |
| Gallstone ileus | Hirschsprung's disease |
| Meckel's diverticulum | Intussusception (adults - suspect malignancy) |
Q: Cardinal features of intestinal obstruction?
VDCA:
- Vomiting - early in high SBO (bile-stained), late in LBO (faeculent)
- Distension - absent in high SBO; marked in LBO
- Colic - intermittent central (SBO) or lower abdominal (LBO)
- Absolute constipation - no passage of flatus or faeces
Signs: Visible peristalsis, high-pitched bowel sounds, tenderness (if strangulation)
Q: X-ray features of SBO vs. LBO?
| SBO (Small Bowel) | LBO (Large Bowel) |
|---|
| Gas pattern | Central, multiple loops | Peripheral, around the frame of abdomen |
| Mucosal folds | Valvulae conniventes - go completely across the lumen | Haustra - partial indentations, do NOT cross completely |
| Air-fluid levels | Multiple, ladder pattern, same height | Fewer, large |
| Colon gas | Absent (distal to block) | Present proximal to obstruction |
Q: Valvulae conniventes vs. Haustra on X-ray?
| Valvulae Conniventes | Haustra |
|---|
| Location | Small bowel | Large bowel (colon) |
| Appearance | Complete - stretch across the entire lumen | Incomplete - indentations that don't cross fully |
| Spacing | Closely spaced, regular | Widely spaced, irregular |
Q: What does "drip and suck" mean? When is it used?
"Drip and suck" = IV fluids (drip) + nasogastric tube aspiration (suck).
Used in: Initial conservative management of intestinal obstruction, especially:
- Adhesive SBO (70% resolve with this alone)
- Paralytic ileus
Components:
- NG tube - decompress stomach, prevent aspiration, reduce distension
- IV fluids - correct dehydration and electrolyte imbalance (especially Na⁺, K⁺, Cl⁻)
- Catheter - monitor urine output
- Monitor vitals, bowel sounds, abdominal girth
Q: Indications for emergency surgery in intestinal obstruction?
- Signs of strangulation (constant pain, fever, tachycardia, peritonism)
- Closed-loop obstruction (volvulus)
- Complete obstruction not resolving with conservative management (>48-72 hrs)
- Large bowel obstruction (usually does NOT resolve conservatively - colon cannot decompress)
- Peritonitis (perforation suspected)
- Failure of Gastrografin trial in adhesive SBO
Q: Role of Gastrografin in adhesive obstruction?
Gastrografin (water-soluble contrast) given orally or via NG tube:
- If it reaches the colon within 4-8 hours on X-ray → obstruction will likely resolve conservatively
- If it doesn't reach colon → surgery indicated
Therapeutic effect: Gastrografin is hypertonic - draws fluid into the bowel lumen → reduces oedema of bowel wall and surrounding adhesions → helps resolve obstruction.
Q: Management of sigmoid volvulus?
First line: Rigid or flexible sigmoidoscopy + flatus tube - passes through the twisted segment, decompresses it, releases the volvulus. Success rate ~80%.
If fails or gangrenous bowel: Emergency surgery:
- Viable bowel: Detorsion + Hartmann's procedure or resection with anastomosis
- Gangrenous bowel: Resection always needed
Elective after successful decompression: Sigmoid resection (high recurrence ~50% without surgery)
TOPIC 12: INTESTINAL PERFORATION
Q: Common causes of intestinal perforation in a surgical context?
- Peptic ulcer disease (duodenal > gastric) - most common in adults
- Typhoid fever (terminal ileum - Peyer's patches)
- Trauma (blunt or penetrating)
- Colonic carcinoma (obstructive perforation)
- Diverticulitis (colonic perforation)
- Crohn's disease
- Appendicitis
- Ischaemic bowel
- Iatrogenic (post-colonoscopy, post-biopsy)
Q: Most common site of typhoid perforation?
Terminal ileum - last 60 cm, specifically at the Peyer's patches (lymphoid aggregates on the anti-mesenteric border). Peyer's patches undergo necrosis in typhoid fever → ulcerate → perforate.
Q: Difference between peptic ulcer perforation and typhoid perforation?
| Feature | Peptic Ulcer Perforation | Typhoid Perforation |
|---|
| Site | Duodenum (anterior wall, 1st part) | Terminal ileum |
| Age | Middle-aged adults, males | Young adults, endemic areas |
| History | Epigastric pain, PUD history | Fever for 2-3 weeks, step-ladder fever |
| Onset | Sudden, catastrophic | Gradual worsening during illness |
| X-ray gas | Usually prominent pneumoperitoneum | Pneumoperitoneum may be small or absent |
| Peritonitis | Chemical initially → bacterial | Bacterial peritonitis from onset |
| Repair | Graham's patch (omental patch) | Primary repair (single/double layer) |
Q: Investigation of choice for suspected perforation?
Erect X-ray abdomen / Erect CXR - to look for gas under the diaphragm (pneumoperitoneum).
Gas under the right dome of diaphragm = free air in peritoneal cavity = perforation until proven otherwise.
CT abdomen (with contrast): Gold standard if X-ray inconclusive - shows free air, site of leak, peritoneal fluid.
Q: Why can gas under diaphragm be absent in perforation?
- Small or sealed perforation (e.g., posterior duodenal ulcer - retroperitoneal leak)
- Typhoid perforation (small hole, quickly sealed by omentum)
- Right lateral decubitus position not maintained long enough
- Very early perforation
- Retroperitoneal perforation (no free peritoneal air)
If clinical suspicion high but X-ray normal → CT is mandatory before abandoning diagnosis.
Q: CT findings in intestinal perforation?
- Free air (pneumoperitoneum) - pathognomonic
- Free fluid (ascites) - peritoneal contamination
- Bowel wall thickening at perforation site
- Adjacent mesenteric fat stranding
- Oral contrast extravasation (if given)
- Identifies site (stomach, duodenum, ileum, colon)
Q: Principles of emergency laparotomy for perforation?
- Resuscitate first - IV fluids, antibiotics, catheter, NG tube, correct electrolytes
- Midline laparotomy - best access to entire abdomen
- Identify and control the source - close/repair the perforation
- Peritoneal lavage - copious warm saline (3-10 litres) to remove pus and contamination
- Drain placement - near repair site and in pelvis (controversial, but common practice)
- Wound closure - primary if clean enough; delayed closure if grossly contaminated
Q: Surgical management of typhoid perforation?
Options:
- Primary repair (simple closure in two layers) - preferred if single perforation, healthy bowel edges, early presentation
- Resection and anastomosis - multiple perforations, necrotic bowel
- Ileostomy - grossly contaminated, sick patient (staged procedure)
Adjunct: Continue anti-typhoid antibiotics (IV chloramphenicol or ciprofloxacin + third-generation cephalosporin), nutritional support.
Q: What is peritoneal lavage? How much saline?
Washing the entire peritoneal cavity with warm normal saline to dilute and remove:
- Bacteria and toxins
- Pus and fibrin
- Bile, gastric contents, or faecal matter
Volume: 3-10 litres of warm (37°C) normal saline. Some surgeons wash "until the fluid runs clear."
Technique: Systematically lavage all four quadrants, subphrenic spaces, paracolic gutters, and pelvis.
Q: What drains are placed after perforation repair?
- Sub-hepatic drain (near repair site)
- Pelvic drain (dependent position - collects contaminated fluid)
Drains in peritonitis are controversial - they do NOT treat peritonitis but help monitor for re-leak or anastomotic breakdown. Most surgeons place them near the repair. Drains should be removed early (2-3 days) as they become ineffective and may introduce infection.
Q: Mortality factors in intestinal perforation?
- Delay in presentation / surgery (>24 hrs significantly worsens outcome)
- Faecal peritonitis (worse than purulent or chemical)
- Age and comorbidities
- Degree of peritoneal contamination
- Haemodynamic instability (septic shock)
- Multiple perforations
- Poor nutritional status
Mortality: Peptic perforation ~5-10%; Typhoid perforation ~10-30% (higher in resource-limited settings)
TOPIC 13: DIABETIC FOOT
(Focused on additional questions beyond what was covered in Topic 6)
Q: Texas classification of diabetic foot ulcers?
A 2-axis classification (Grade + Stage):
| Grade | Depth |
|---|
| 0 | Pre/post-ulcerative lesion, epithelialised |
| 1 | Superficial wound, not tendon/capsule/bone |
| 2 | Wound penetrating to tendon or capsule |
| 3 | Wound penetrating to bone or joint |
| Stage | Condition |
|---|
| A | Clean wound |
| B | Non-ischaemic infected wound |
| C | Ischaemic, non-infected |
| D | Ischaemic and infected |
Grade 3D = worst prognosis (deep + ischaemic + infected).
Q: Wet gangrene vs. dry gangrene?
| Feature | Dry Gangrene | Wet Gangrene |
|---|
| Cause | Pure arterial ischaemia, gradual | Infection superimposed on ischaemia / venous obstruction |
| Appearance | Black, mummified, wrinkled, dry | Black, swollen, blistered, foul-smelling |
| Spread | Does NOT spread | Rapidly spreads |
| Smell | No odour | Foul odour (putrefaction) |
| Line of demarcation | Clear, well-defined | Absent / ill-defined |
| Systemic toxicity | Minimal | Severe - septicaemia |
| Treatment | Elective amputation | Emergency debridement/amputation |
| Common in | Pure PVD | Diabetic foot (infection + ischaemia) |
Q: Cellulitis vs. necrotizing fasciitis in diabetic foot?
| Feature | Cellulitis | Necrotizing Fasciitis |
|---|
| Depth | Dermis + subcutaneous | Deep fascia |
| Skin colour | Red, warm | Red → purple → black |
| Pain | Proportionate | Disproportionately severe (early), then decreased (nerve death) |
| Crepitus | Absent | Present (gas-forming organisms) |
| Blisters | Occasional | Haemorrhagic bullae |
| Systemic toxicity | Moderate | Severe - rapidly fatal if untreated |
| X-ray | Normal | Gas in soft tissues |
| Treatment | IV antibiotics | Emergency wide surgical debridement ("finger test" positive) |
Finger test: Under LA, a 2 cm incision at the edge - if finger passes through fascia with no resistance and there is no bleeding (grey/brown necrotic tissue, "dishwater" fluid) → necrotizing fasciitis confirmed.
Q: How to assess PVD in diabetic foot? (ABI, Doppler, angiography)
Bedside:
- Palpate peripheral pulses (femoral, popliteal, dorsalis pedis, posterior tibial)
- ABI (Ankle Brachial Index) - see Topic 6
Non-invasive imaging:
- Duplex Doppler USG: Shows flow velocity, stenosis location - first-line imaging
- CT angiography (CTA): Fast, good anatomical detail, shows entire arterial tree
Invasive:
- Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA): Gold standard; simultaneous treatment possible (angioplasty)
- MR Angiography (MRA): No radiation, good for distal vessels; limited by motion artefact
Q: What is critical limb ischaemia (CLI)?
Severe peripheral arterial disease with:
- Rest pain lasting >2 weeks requiring analgesia, OR
- Ischaemic ulceration / gangrene
Criteria: ABI <0.4, ankle systolic pressure <50 mmHg, toe pressure <30 mmHg.
Management: Urgent revascularisation (angioplasty/bypass) if possible, otherwise amputation. Without revascularisation, limb loss rate is ~25% at 1 year.
Q: Role of revascularisation - angioplasty vs. bypass?
| Angioplasty (PTA ± Stent) | Bypass Surgery |
|---|
| Best for | Short segment stenosis (<10 cm), iliac/fem-pop | Long segment occlusion, multiple levels |
| Access | Endovascular (catheter) | Open surgery |
| Recovery | Fast | Slow |
| Long-term patency | Lower (>10 cm lesions) | Better for complex/long occlusions |
| Risk | Low (local complications) | Higher morbidity (general anaesthesia) |
| Conduit (bypass) | - | Autologous saphenous vein (preferred) or PTFE graft |
Q: Levels of amputation in diabetic foot?
From distal to proximal:
- Toe amputation (ray amputation if metatarsal also included)
- Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) - through the metatarsals
- Syme's amputation - through the ankle; preserves heel pad for weight bearing
- Below-knee (BK) / transtibial - preserves knee joint; best functional outcome with prosthesis
- Through-knee (disarticulation)
- Above-knee (AK) / transfemoral - higher energy cost for prosthetic walking
- Hip disarticulation / hindquarter - for extensive proximal disease
Rule: Preserve as much limb as possible while ensuring viable, tension-free skin flaps at stump.
Q: Guillotine followed by formal amputation - principle?
Guillotine: Emergency, rapid, no flaps - transect all tissues (skin, muscle, bone) at one level. Wound left completely open. Done in septic, critically ill patients to achieve immediate source control.
Formal re-amputation: Done 3-5 days later once patient is stable, infection controlled, and clean granulating tissue is present. Proper flaps fashioned, bone trimmed, wound closed.
TOPIC 14: RIGHT-SIDED PARALYSIS (Surgical Long Case Context)
In surgery long cases, this usually means a patient with right hemiplegia being assessed for carotid artery disease or as a comorbidity before surgery.
Q: Which vessel is affected causing contralateral hemiplegia?
Left internal carotid artery / Left middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory supplies the right side of the body's motor and sensory cortex.
- Occlusion of left ICA or left MCA → Right hemiplegia + right hemisensory loss + (if dominant hemisphere) aphasia
- The motor fibres decussate in the medullary pyramids → hence contralateral weakness
Q: What is carotid stenosis? How is it investigated?
Atherosclerotic narrowing of the internal carotid artery, usually at the bifurcation of the common carotid artery.
Symptoms: TIA, amaurosis fugax, stroke.
Investigations:
- Duplex Doppler USG - first line; shows degree of stenosis, plaque morphology
- CT angiography (CTA) - non-invasive, excellent detail
- MR angiography (MRA) - no radiation; good for soft plaque
- Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) - gold standard, but invasive; rarely needed now
- MRI brain - shows existing infarcts
Q: What is carotid endarterectomy (CEA)? Indications?
CEA: Surgical removal of the atheromatous plaque from the internal carotid artery to restore lumen and prevent stroke.
Indications (symptomatic patients):
- Stenosis >70% - strong indication (NNT = 6 to prevent 1 stroke over 5 years)
- Stenosis 50-70% - moderate benefit; consider CEA
- Stenosis <50% - medical management only
Asymptomatic patients:
- Stenosis >70-80% - CEA may be considered in good surgical risk patients
Q: CEA vs. Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)?
| CEA | CAS |
|---|
| Approach | Open surgical | Endovascular (catheter) |
| Preferred in | Standard risk patients, older (>70), radiation neck, contralateral occlusion | High surgical risk, re-stenosis, hostile neck |
| Risk | Cranial nerve injury, wound haematoma | Higher peri-procedural stroke risk |
| Long-term efficacy | Slightly better | Similar in low-risk patients |
| Trial evidence | NASCET, ECST trials support CEA | CREST trial - equivalent in low-risk |
Q: What is amaurosis fugax?
Transient monocular blindness - sudden painless loss of vision in one eye lasting seconds to minutes, described as a "curtain coming down."
Cause: Transient ischaemia of the retina from an embolus originating in the ipsilateral carotid artery.
Significance: It is a TIA equivalent - warrants urgent carotid Doppler and anti-platelet therapy. High short-term stroke risk.
Q: How do you assess a hemiplegic patient for elective surgery?
- History: Duration of stroke, residual deficits, medications (anticoagulants, antiplatelets)
- Examination: Neurological status, respiratory function (aspiration risk), contractures
- Investigations: MRI brain (recent infarct?), ECG (AF as embolic source), Echo, carotid Doppler, coagulation
- Anaesthetic risk: ASA Class III minimum
- Timing: Elective surgery ideally delayed 6 weeks after acute stroke (neurological instability, bleeding risk from thrombolytics)
- Medications: Continue antiplatelets (aspirin) peri-operatively; discuss anticoagulant bridging
Q: ASA grading?
| Grade | Description |
|---|
| ASA I | Normal healthy patient |
| ASA II | Mild systemic disease (e.g., well-controlled DM, hypertension) |
| ASA III | Severe systemic disease (e.g., poorly controlled DM, COPD, stable angina) |
| ASA IV | Severe, life-threatening systemic disease (e.g., recent MI, severe heart failure) |
| ASA V | Moribund, not expected to survive without surgery |
| ASA VI | Brain-dead, organ donation |
| E suffix | Emergency surgery (e.g., ASA IIIE) |
TOPIC 15: PERI-AMPULLARY MASS (Periampullary Carcinoma)
Q: What is the Ampulla of Vater? What opens into it?
The ampulla of Vater is the dilated junction of the:
- Common bile duct (CBD)
- Main pancreatic duct (duct of Wirsung)
Located at the posteromedial wall of the second part of the duodenum, surrounded by the sphincter of Oddi (controls flow of bile and pancreatic juice).
Q: Blood supply of the head of the pancreas?
- Superior pancreaticoduodenal artery (from gastroduodenal artery - branch of common hepatic artery)
- Inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (from superior mesenteric artery)
These form anastomotic arcades - both the pancreatic head and duodenum share the same blood supply. This is why both must be resected together in a Whipple's procedure.
Q: Four types of periampullary carcinoma?
- Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (best prognosis - 5-year survival ~40%)
- Carcinoma of the head of the pancreas (worst prognosis - 5-year survival ~10-20%)
- Carcinoma of the lower CBD (distal cholangiocarcinoma)
- Carcinoma of the periampullary duodenum
All four cause obstructive jaundice. Ampullary carcinoma has the best prognosis because it becomes symptomatic (jaundice, bleeding) early when it is still resectable.
Q: What is Courvoisier's law?
"If the gallbladder is palpably enlarged in the presence of jaundice, the cause is unlikely to be gallstones."
Reason: In chronic gallstone disease, the gallbladder wall becomes fibrotic and thickened (cannot distend). In malignant obstruction (e.g., carcinoma head of pancreas), the gallbladder is normal and distends passively with bile.
Important: Courvoisier's sign (palpable gallbladder + jaundice) = malignant obstruction until proven otherwise. But 50% of malignant obstructions do NOT have a palpable gallbladder, so a negative sign does NOT rule out malignancy.
Q: Surgical vs. non-surgical (medical) jaundice?
| Feature | Surgical Jaundice (Obstructive) | Medical Jaundice |
|---|
| Type | Post-hepatic (obstructive) | Pre-hepatic (haemolytic) or Hepatic (hepatocellular) |
| Bilirubin | Conjugated (direct) elevated | Unconjugated (haemolytic) or both (hepatocellular) |
| Urine | Dark (bilirubinuria) | Normal (haemolytic) or dark (hepatocellular) |
| Stool | Pale (clay-coloured) | Normal or dark |
| Pruritus | Severe | Mild or absent |
| LFT | Elevated ALP + GGT >> AST/ALT | AST/ALT >> ALP |
| USG | Dilated CBD + intrahepatic ducts | Normal bile ducts |
Q: Charcot's triad and Reynold's pentad?
Charcot's triad (ascending cholangitis):
- Right upper quadrant pain
- Fever with rigors
- Jaundice
Reynold's pentad (suppurative/severe cholangitis):
1-3. Above three +
4. Hypotension (septic shock)
5. Altered mental status / confusion
Reynold's pentad = life-threatening emergency → urgent biliary decompression (ERCP or PTC) + IV antibiotics + ICU.
Q: Features: CA head of pancreas vs. ampullary carcinoma?
| Feature | CA Head of Pancreas | Ampullary Carcinoma |
|---|
| Jaundice | Progressive, painless, deep | Fluctuating (tumour may ulcerate and temporarily decompress) |
| Pain | Back pain (retroperitoneal invasion) | Epigastric pain; no back pain |
| GI bleed | Rare | Common (ulceration into duodenum - melaena) |
| Courvoisier's | Often present | Less common |
| Prognosis | Poor (5-yr survival 10-20%) | Better (5-yr survival 40-50%) |
| CA 19-9 | Markedly elevated | Mildly elevated |
Q: Investigations for obstructive jaundice workup?
Blood:
- LFTs (conjugated bilirubin, ALP, GGT elevated)
- CA 19-9, CEA
- PT/INR (coagulopathy from vitamin K malabsorption)
Imaging:
- USG abdomen - first line; shows dilated CBD, gallstones, liver mets
- CECT abdomen (triple phase) - shows tumour, vascular involvement (portal vein, SMA), resectability
- MRCP - non-invasive, shows bile duct anatomy, "double duct sign"
- ERCP - diagnostic + therapeutic (brush cytology + stent placement)
- EUS (Endoscopic USG) - best for small ampullary tumours and biopsy
Q: What is the "double duct sign"?
On MRCP or ERCP: simultaneous dilatation of both the CBD and the main pancreatic duct at the level of their junction, causing an abrupt cutoff.
Significance: Highly suggestive of carcinoma of the head of pancreas (or periampullary carcinoma) obstructing both ducts simultaneously.
Q: What is Whipple's procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy)? Structures resected?
Structures Resected:
- Head of pancreas
- Duodenum (entire)
- Distal stomach (antrum) - classical Whipple
- Distal common bile duct
- Gallbladder
- ± Proximal jejunum (first 10-15 cm)
Q: What is PPPD (Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy)?
Same as Whipple's but the pylorus and the entire stomach are preserved (only the duodenum is resected from just beyond the pylorus).
Advantages: Better nutritional outcome, less dumping syndrome, preserves gastric reservoir function.
Disadvantage: Higher rate of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) post-op compared to classical Whipple.
Q: Anastomoses in Whipple's procedure?
After resection, three anastomoses are made in this order ("reconstruction"):
- Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) - pancreatic duct joined to jejunum (most critical - high leak risk)
- Hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) - CBD joined to jejunum
- Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) - stomach joined to jejunum (or duodenojejunostomy in PPPD)
All three are end-to-side anastomoses to a Roux-en-Y loop of jejunum.
Q: Complications of Whipple's procedure?
Specific (unique):
- Delayed Gastric Emptying (DGE) - most common complication (~20-30%); patient cannot eat, prolonged NG drainage needed
- Pancreatic fistula / leak - most dangerous; amylase-rich fluid from PJ anastomosis
- Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH) - can be sentinel bleed then massive bleed
- Bile leak - from HJ anastomosis
General:
- Wound infection
- Deep vein thrombosis
- Chest infection
- Intra-abdominal abscess
New-onset diabetes - occurs in ~25% after removal of pancreatic head (loss of islet cells)
Q: Prognosis of peri-ampullary carcinoma vs. pancreatic head carcinoma?
| Ampullary Ca | CA Head of Pancreas |
|---|
| 5-year survival (resected) | 40-50% | 15-25% |
| 5-year survival (overall) | ~35% | ~5-10% |
| Resectability rate | ~80% | ~15-20% |
| Reason for better prognosis | Presents early with jaundice; localised; better differentiated | Aggressive biology, late presentation, early vascular invasion |
That completes all 15 topics. You now have a full surgery long case viva preparation guide covering every question from all three sessions. Good luck with your exam!