CAD/CAM milled occlusal splints demonstrated maximum flexural strength among all groups.  Conventional occlusal splints showed minimum flexural strength but lowest surface roughness.  3D printed splints exhibited intermediate mechanical and surface properties.  Both flexural strength and surface roughness were significantly affected by fabrication technique. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, it can be concluded that: 1. CAD/CAM milling produces occlusal splints with superior flexural strength, making them suitable for patients requiring higher fracture resistance. 2. 3D printed occlusal splints offer a balance between strength and surface characteristics and may serve as a viable alternative in clinical practice. 3. Conventional heat-cured splints, while exhibiting lower strength, demonstrate smoother surfaces and remain clinically acceptable when cost and accessibility are considerations. The choice of fabrication technique should be guided by clinical requirements, functional load, and patient-specific factors

This appears to be a conclusion/summary from a research study comparing three occlusal splint fabrication techniques (CAD/CAM milling, 3D printing, and conventional heat-curing) in terms of flexural strength and surface roughness.
What would you like me to do with this content? For example:
  • Explain the clinical significance of these findings
  • Search for related published literature on this topic
  • Create a document (Word, PDF, presentation) based on this content
  • Expand this into a full discussion section
  • Critique the conclusions or suggest limitations
Let me know how I can help!

write citation

Asking for Preferences
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.