I now have all the information needed for a comprehensive answer.
SLAP Tear (Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior)
SLAP = Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior. It describes a tear of the glenoid labrum that starts posteriorly and extends anteriorly, crossing the attachment of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon at the supraglenoid tubercle. First described and classified by Snyder et al. in 1990.
Anatomy
The superior labrum differs from the inferior labrum in being more loosely adherent to the glenoid, typically attaching more medially (off the glenoid face). The biceps tendon has a complex insertion:
- 50% of fibers insert into the superior labrum
- 50% insert into the supraglenoid tubercle (6.6 mm from the glenoid face at the 12-o'clock position)
Important anatomical variants that can mimic SLAP tears on imaging:
- Sublabral foramen (anterosuperior)
- Sublabral foramen + thickened MGHL (~9% of shoulders)
- Buford complex - absence of the anterosuperior labrum + thickened MGHL (1.5% of shoulders)
Snyder Classification
| Type | Description | Biceps Anchor | Treatment |
|---|
| I | Fraying/degeneration of the superior labrum edge | Intact | Debridement |
| II | Pathologic detachment of labrum + biceps anchor from superior glenoid | Unstable | Repair (most common - see subtypes below) |
| III | Vertical bucket-handle tear within the labrum (meniscoid-type) | Intact | Excision of fragment |
| IV | Bucket-handle tear extending into the biceps tendon | Involved | Excision if <30% tendon; repair or tenodesis if >30% |
Type II subtypes (most important - use mnemonic ABC):
- IIA - tear extends Anteriorly to biceps anchor
- IIB - tear extends posteriorly (Back)
- IIC - Combined (anterior + posterior)
Type II is the most common SLAP lesion overall. The original four-type classification has been expanded to 10 subtypes. - Miller's Review of Orthopaedics
Epidemiology & Risk Factors
- SLAP tears are uncommon, accounting for ~5% of all shoulder injuries
- Most common in overhead athletes (pitchers, swimmers, volleyball players) and laborers
- Onset may be traumatic or insidious
Mechanism of Injury
Two main mechanisms (Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics):
- Traction - fall on an outstretched hand, sudden pull on the arm, or throwing motion generating traction on the biceps anchor
- Peel-back - torsional force during the late cocking phase of throwing (shoulder in maximum abduction + external rotation). The biceps-labral complex twists and peels medially off the superior glenoid. This is the classic mechanism for posterior Type II SLAP lesions
Other mechanisms include compression (FOOSH with axial loading) and repetitive microtrauma from overhead activities.
Clinical Features
- Anterior shoulder pain radiating into the biceps
- Catching, clicking, or popping with overhead activity
- "Dead arm" syndrome in throwing athletes - sudden loss of strength/control during throwing
- Pain with overhead activities, especially in the late cocking phase
- May present with instability symptoms if the labral detachment is significant
Physical Examination
No single test is specific for SLAP tear. A combination of tests is recommended.
| Test | How Performed | Positive Finding | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|
| O'Brien's (Active Compression) | Arm at 90° FF, 10° adduction, maximal pronation - resist flexion; then supinate and repeat | Pain or click with pronation, relieved with supination | Moderate | High (~90% for AC joint; moderate for SLAP) |
| Crank test | Arm at 160° FF, axial load applied, rotate humerus | Pain or click with loading | Moderate | Moderate |
| Speed's test | 90° shoulder FF, elbow extended, forearm supinated - resist flexion | Bicipital groove pain | 32-63% | 58-75% |
| Yergason's test | Elbow at 90°, forearm pronated - resist supination | Bicipital groove pain or snap | 32-43% | 78-83% |
| Dynamic labral shear test | - | - | Higher sensitivity | - |
| Kibler anterior slide test | - | - | Moderate | Moderate |
| Kim biceps load test | - | - | High | High |
Best test combinations (Campbell's, 2026):
- Most sensitive combination: O'Brien + Crank test (in parallel)
- Most specific combination: Yergason + Anterior slide test (in series)
- Running tests in series (both must be positive) increases specificity; running in parallel (either positive) increases sensitivity
Imaging
| Modality | Utility |
|---|
| Plain X-ray | Generally unhelpful; may show paralabral cyst |
| Standard MRI | Poor sensitivity for SLAP lesions |
| MR arthrography (gadolinium) | Investigation of choice - sensitivity 91%, specificity 93% for labral pathology |
| CT arthrography | Alternative to MRA |
| Ultrasound | Can detect biceps tendon subluxation but not SLAP lesions directly |
MRA findings suggesting SLAP tear:
- Abnormal signal or contrast extending into the substance of or beneath the superior labrum
- Signal extending lateral to the glenoid or posterior to the biceps tendon
- A paralabral cyst (almost pathognomonic for a SLAP or posterior labral tear); if it extends to the spinoglenoid notch it can compress the suprascapular nerve causing infraspinatus wasting
Arthroscopic Findings
On arthroscopy, positive signs include:
- Superior sulcus >5 mm in depth
- Displaceable biceps root with a probe
- Positive drive-through sign
- Positive peel-back sign - in abduction + external rotation, the posterior labrum and biceps-labral complex drop medially over the glenoid edge (diagnostic of posterior type II SLAP)
Treatment
Nonoperative (first line for virtually all patients)
- Rotator cuff strengthening + scapular stabilization
- Posterior capsule stretching (especially in throwers)
- Intraarticular corticosteroid injections
- Activity modification
Operative
Indicated for symptomatic overhead athletes who fail conservative management. Treatment is highly controversial, especially for Type II lesions.
| Type | Surgical Treatment |
|---|
| Type I | Arthroscopic debridement |
| Type II | SLAP repair in young overhead/throwing athletes (<35-40 yrs); biceps tenodesis or tenotomy in older patients or non-throwing athletes |
| Type III | Excision of bucket-handle fragment (if biceps anchor intact) |
| Type IV | Excision if <30% biceps tendon involved; suture repair if ~1/3 involved; biceps tenodesis/tenotomy if >1/3 involved |
Key principle: Primary SLAP repair is NOT recommended in patients >35-40 years old. Multiple studies show poor results with SLAP repair in older individuals. Biceps tenodesis is a more reliable option for this group. - Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed, p. 3161
Sources: Miller's Review of Orthopaedics 9th Ed, Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics 15th Ed (2026), Firestein & Kelley's Textbook of Rheumatology, Rheumatology 2-Volume Set (Elsevier 2022)