From recent advances point of view, answer the following 1. IHC for CUP 2. IHC for lymphoma 3. IHC for metastatic tumors 4. IHC for breast carcinoma 5. IHC for lung tumors 6. IHC for undifferentiated tumors

Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Reading File
Reading File
Searching PubMed

immunohistochemistry carcinoma unknown primary CUP diagnosis

Searching the Web

IHC panel immunohistochemistry CUP lymphoma breast lung undifferentiated tumors 2024 2025 updates

Loading Image
Reading File
Reading File
Reading File
Loading Image
Reading File
Reading File
I now have comprehensive, well-sourced information to write a thorough answer on all 6 topics. Let me compile the complete response.

IHC in Pathology: Recent Advances - A Comprehensive Review


1. IHC for Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (CUP)

CUP accounts for ~3-5% of all malignancies. On light microscopy, 60-65% are adenocarcinomas, 5% squamous cell carcinoma, and 30-35% poorly differentiated carcinoma or undifferentiated neoplasm. IHC is the cornerstone of workup, but the emphasis in recent guidelines (SEOM-GECOD 2025, NCCN 2025) has shifted: tissue must now be conserved for molecular profiling (NGS/CGP), and IHC should be used in a tiered, targeted manner rather than exhaustively.

The CK7/CK20 Framework (First Step)

The cytokeratin expression pattern is the initial filter for adenocarcinomas:
CK7/CK20 approach to adenocarcinoma of unknown primary - Harrison's 22E
CK7CK20Likely Primaries
++Urothelial, ovarian mucinous, pancreatic, cholangiocarcinoma
+-Lung adenocarcinoma, breast, thyroid, endometrial, cervical, salivary gland, cholangiocarcinoma
-+Colorectal carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma
--Hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, prostate, SCC and SCLC, head & neck
The CK7+/CK20- pattern is the most common in CUP but is not site-specific on its own, requiring further second-tier markers.

Expanded IHC Panel by Suspected Primary (Table 97-2, Harrison's 22E, 2025)

Likely PrimaryKey IHC Markers
BreastER, GCDFP-15, mammaglobin, HER2/neu, GATA3
Ovarian/mullerianER, WT1, CK7, PAX8, PAX2
Lung adenocarcinomaTTF-1 (nuclear), napsin A, SP-A1
Germ cellbeta-hCG, AFP, OCT3/4, CKIT, CD30 (embryonal), SALL4
ProstatePSA, AMACR/P504S, P501S, PSMA, NKX3-1
IntestinalCK20, CDX-2, CEA
NeuroendocrineChromogranin, synaptophysin, CD56
SarcomaDesmin, factor VIII, CD31, smooth muscle actin, MyoD1
RenalRCC antigen, CD10, PAX8
HepatocellularHep Par-1, Arg-1, glypican-3
MelanomaS100, SOX-10, HMB-45, tyrosinase, melan-A
UrothelialCK7, CK20, thrombomodulin, uroplakin III
MesotheliomaCalretinin, WT1, D2-40, mesothelin
LymphomaLCA (CD45), CD3, CD4, CD5, CD20
SCCp63, p40, CK5/6
Recent advances:
  • GATA3 is a newer, highly sensitive marker for breast and urothelial carcinomas
  • NKX3-1 has replaced or supplements PSA for prostate - more specific
  • PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) is increasingly used for prostate CUP
  • INSM1 is a newer neuroendocrine marker (nuclear transcription factor), more sensitive than chromogranin in poorly preserved specimens
  • Molecular profiling (RNA-seq/CGP) is now recommended alongside IHC per the 2025 SEOM-GECOD guidelines; the CUPISCO trial (Lancet Oncol 2024) showed survival benefit when NGS guides site-specific treatment in CUP
  • IHC alone is insufficient to guide site-specific treatment - results are "suggestive" not "definitive"

2. IHC for Lymphoma

IHC is essential for lymphoma subclassification according to WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th edition, 2022). The approach is stepwise.

Step 1: Lineage Determination

MarkerLineage
LCA (CD45)All lymphoid tumors
CD20, CD19, CD22, CD79a, PAX5B-cell
CD3, CD2, CD5, CD7T-cell
CD56, cytoplasmic CD3NK-cell

Step 2: B-Cell Lymphoma Subclassification

Lymphoma TypeKey IHC Markers
Follicular lymphomaCD20+, CD10+, BCL2+, BCL6+, CD5-, cyclin D1-
Diffuse Large B-Cell (DLBCL)CD20+, CD19+, CD22+, CD79a+; GCB type: CD10+/BCL6+/MUM1-; non-GCB: MUM1+
Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)CD20+, CD5+, cyclin D1+, BCL2+, SOX11+; CD23-, CD10-
CLL/SLLCD20(dim)+, CD5+, CD23+, CD200+, cyclin D1-
Burkitt LymphomaCD20+, CD10+, BCL6+, BCL2-, Ki-67 ~100%, c-MYC+
Marginal Zone LymphomaCD20+, CD5-, CD10-, BCL2+, cyclin D1-
Hairy Cell LeukemiaCD20+, CD103+, CD25+, annexin A1+, BRAF V600E (IHC)
DLBCL GCB vs. non-GCB (Hans algorithm) using IHC:
  • GCB type: CD10+ (>30%) OR CD10-/BCL6+/MUM1- → better prognosis
  • Non-GCB: MUM1+ → worse prognosis, responds differently to treatment

Step 3: T-Cell/NK Lymphoma Subclassification

Lymphoma TypeKey IHC Markers
Peripheral T-cell, NOSCD3+, CD4+>CD8+, loss of CD5/CD7
Anaplastic Large Cell (ALCL)CD30+, ALK+/-, EMA+, CD3+/-
Angioimmunoblastic T-cellCD3+, CD4+, PD-1+, CXCL13+, ICOS+, BCL6+
NK/T-cell nasalCD56+, cytoplasmic CD3+, EBER+ (ISH), TIA1+, granzyme B+
Recent advances in lymphoma IHC:
  • SOX11: Useful marker for cyclin D1-negative MCL; SOX11-negative MCL tends to be more indolent
  • BRAF V600E IHC: Now used as a surrogate for mutation testing in hairy cell leukemia and some follicular lymphomas
  • PD-L1 IHC: Increasingly important for DLBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma - guides checkpoint inhibitor eligibility
  • MYC/BCL2/BCL6 double/triple-hit: IHC for MYC (>40%), BCL2 (>50%) triggers FISH confirmation; "double expressor" lymphomas have poorer prognosis
  • EBER in situ hybridization (not strictly IHC but part of the panel) is mandatory for NK/T-cell and EBV-associated lymphomas
  • IRF4/MUM1: Distinguishes GCB from non-GCB subtypes of DLBCL

3. IHC for Metastatic Tumors

The challenge is distinguishing primary from metastatic disease, especially when the primary is unknown or when multiple sites are present.

General Principles

  • No single marker is 100% sensitive or specific - panels outperform individual markers
  • TTF-1 stains ~75% of pulmonary adenocarcinomas but also stains thyroid carcinoma and occasionally ovarian tumors
  • Organ-specific markers (PSA for prostate, thyroglobulin for thyroid) are highly specific but these rarely present as CUP

Common Differential Diagnoses and IHC

Metastatic Site/ScenarioPrimaryKey Positive MarkersKey Negative Markers
Liver metastasisColorectalCK20+, CDX-2+, CEA+CK7-, TTF-1-
Liver metastasisHCC (primary)Hep Par-1+, Arg-1+, glypican-3+, AFP+CK7-, CK20-
Liver metastasisCholangiocarcinomaCK7+, CK19+, K20±Hep Par-1-
Pleural metastasisBreastER+, GATA3+, mammaglobin+WT1-, mesothelin-
Pleural metastasisMesothelioma (vs mets)Calretinin+, WT1+, D2-40+, mesothelin+CEA-, MOC31-, TTF-1-
Bone metastasisProstatePSA+, NKX3-1+, PSMA+-
Brain metastasisLung adenoTTF-1+, napsin A+-
Brain metastasisRCCPAX8+, CD10+, carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX)+-
Axillary LNBreastER+, GATA3+, GCDFP-15+-
Skin metastasisLung (non-small cell)TTF-1+, CK7+, napsin A+CK20-, CDX-2-
Skin metastasisMelanomaS100+, SOX10+, HMB-45+, melan-A+Keratins-
Recent advances:
  • PAX8: One of the most useful newer markers - positive in renal, thyroid, ovarian/mullerian, and thymic tumors
  • CAIX (carbonic anhydrase IX): Highly specific for clear cell RCC metastases
  • SATB2: Highly specific for colorectal and appendiceal origin; supplements CDX-2
  • NKX3-1: Now the preferred prostate-specific marker - more sensitive than PSA in poorly differentiated metastatic prostate carcinoma
  • INSM1: Better neuroendocrine marker in small crushed biopsies vs chromogranin/synaptophysin
  • Claudin-18.2: Emerging marker for gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma metastases - also a therapeutic target (zolbetuximab)
  • TRPS1: A newer, highly sensitive marker for breast origin (more sensitive than GATA3 in some studies)

4. IHC for Breast Carcinoma

IHC in breast carcinoma serves two main purposes: (a) diagnosis/classification, and (b) guiding therapy.

Routine Therapeutic Markers (Mandatory in all invasive breast carcinoma)

MarkerSignificanceScoring/Threshold
ER (Estrogen Receptor)Hormonal therapy eligibility (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors)Allred score; ≥1% nuclear staining = positive (ASCO/CAP 2020 guidelines)
PR (Progesterone Receptor)Complementary prognostic markerSame threshold as ER
HER2/neu (ERBB2)Trastuzumab, pertuzumab, T-DM1, T-DXd eligibilityIHC 0/1+/2+/3+; 3+ = positive; 2+ requires ISH confirmation
Ki-67Proliferation index; guides chemotherapy decisions>20% (or >14% per St. Gallen) = high proliferation

Molecular Subtype Classification by IHC Surrogates

SubtypeERPRHER2Ki-67Prognosis
Luminal A++-Low (<14%)Best
Luminal B (HER2-)++/--High (>14-20%)Intermediate
Luminal B (HER2+)++/-+AnyIntermediate
HER2-enriched--+HighPoor
Triple-negative (TNBC)---HighWorst

Additional Diagnostic/Subclassification Markers

MarkerUse
GATA3Breast lineage marker; highly sensitive (~90%) for breast origin
GCDFP-15 (BRST-2)Specific (~95%) but less sensitive (~50%) for breast origin
MammaglobinModerate sensitivity/specificity; used with GCDFP-15
E-cadherinDistinguishes lobular (negative) from ductal (positive) carcinoma
p120 cateninCytoplasmic in lobular carcinoma; membranous in ductal
Androgen Receptor (AR)Positive in ~70-90% luminal A; therapeutic target in TNBC (LAR subtype)
CK5/6, EGFRBasal-like phenotype within TNBC
PD-L1Pembrolizumab eligibility in TNBC (CPS score with 22C3 antibody)
Recent advances (2023-2025):
  • HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-) is now a distinct therapeutic category - eligible for trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd); this has redefined HER2 reporting
  • HER2-ultralow (IHC >0 and <1+): Emerging category with potential T-DXd benefit (under investigation)
  • TRPS1: Newer breast marker with high sensitivity, even in triple-negative cases
  • BIRD3/LRRC15: Emerging markers for stromal biology in TNBC
  • PIK3CA IHC surrogates: Being investigated as predictors of alpelisib response

5. IHC for Lung Tumors

The 2021 WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumors has expanded IHC requirements for lung tumor subclassification.

Adenocarcinoma vs. Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Core Panel)

The minimum recommended panel for poorly differentiated NSCLC (Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases, citing Best Practices recommendations):
MarkerAdenocarcinomaSquamous Cell Carcinoma
TTF-1+ (~75% of cases)-
Napsin A+ (more specific than TTF-1)-
p40-+ (most specific for SCC)
CK5/6-+
p63-+ (less specific than p40)
CK7++/-
Minimum panel: TTF-1 + p40 (±napsin A or CK5/6)
This IHC panel is clinically critical because:
  • Adenocarcinoma → molecular testing for EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, BRAF, MET, RET, NTRK, PD-L1
  • SCC → immunotherapy assessment; bevacizumab is contraindicated

Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) Panel

TumorSynaptophysinChromograninCD56Ki-67TTF-1
Typical carcinoid+++<5%-
Atypical carcinoid+++5-20%-
Large cell NEC++/-+>50%+/-
SCLC++/-+80-100%+ (~90%)
  • INSM1 is now recommended as a supplementary neuroendocrine marker; it is nuclear, works well in crushed small biopsies where cytoplasmic markers are lost
  • Ki-67 is used as a surrogate for mitotic counting in small biopsies

Other Lung Tumor IHC

TumorKey Markers
Pulmonary carcinoidSynaptophysin+, chromogranin+, CK7+, TTF-1 usually -, low Ki-67
Mesothelioma vs. lung adenoCalretinin+, WT1+, D2-40+, mesothelin+ (meso) vs TTF-1+, napsin A+, MOC-31+ (adeno)
Pulmonary large cell carcinomaDiagnosis of exclusion - negative for TTF-1, napsin A, p40, CK5/6, neuroendocrine markers
NUT carcinomaNUT IHC (nuclear, speckled pattern) - highly specific; SMARCA4 loss
SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomaSMARCA4 (BRG1) loss by IHC
Recent advances:
  • PD-L1 (22C3 clone): Mandatory for all advanced NSCLC; TPS ≥50% = pembrolizumab monotherapy eligible; TPS ≥1% = combination eligible
  • ALK (D5F3 clone): IHC now accepted as a standalone test without mandatory FISH confirmation in many centers
  • ROS1 IHC (D4D6 clone): Screening marker - positive cases confirmed by FISH/NGS
  • INSM1: Added to 2021 WHO-recommended neuroendocrine panel
  • SMARCA4/SMARCB1 loss: IHC markers for rare undifferentiated thoracic malignancies
  • Claudin-18: In lung adenocarcinoma subtyping and as a potential therapeutic target
  • HER2 IHC: Being validated for lung adenocarcinoma (as in breast) - trastuzumab deruxtecan now approved for HER2-mutant NSCLC
Small biopsy showing poorly differentiated NSCLC with IHC panel - TTF-1+, CK5/6-, p63- supporting pulmonary adenocarcinoma (Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases)
A: H&E, B: TTF-1+ (nuclear), C: CK5/6-, D: p63-; confirming adenocarcinoma lineage

6. IHC for Undifferentiated Tumors

When H&E morphology cannot determine tumor lineage, the goal of IHC is to classify undifferentiated neoplasms into one of five broad categories before applying subtype-specific panels:

Step 1: The "Big Five" Lineage Screen

MarkerWhat It Identifies
Broad-spectrum keratin (MNF116, AE1/AE3, CAM5.2)Carcinoma / epithelial origin
LCA (CD45)Lymphoma / hematolymphoid
S100 / SOX10 / HMB-45Melanoma
Vimentin + CD31/CD34/SMA/desminSarcoma (mesenchymal)
OCT3/4 / SALL4Germ cell tumor
NCCN 2025 OCC-A panel for undifferentiated neoplasms:
Initial screen → broad keratin (AE1/AE3) + LCA (CD45) + S100 + vimentin
                ↓                    ↓              ↓
           Carcinoma            Lymphoma         Melanoma/sarcoma
             panel                panel              panel

Step 2: After Lineage Confirmation

If carcinoma confirmed: proceed with CK7/CK20 algorithm (see Section 1 above)
If lymphoma suspected: LCA+ → B-cell (CD20/PAX5) vs T-cell (CD3) vs NK-cell panel
If germ cell suspected: SALL4, OCT3/4, AFP, beta-hCG, CD30, PLAP
If sarcoma suspected:
Sarcoma TypeKey Markers
RhabdomyosarcomaMyoD1+, myogenin+
LeiomyosarcomaSMA+, desmin+, caldesmon+
AngiosarcomaCD31+, CD34+, ERG+, factor VIII+
GISTCD117 (c-KIT)+, DOG1+, CD34+
Synovial sarcomaTLE1+, SS18 rearrangement (FISH), CK+/-
Ewing sarcomaCD99+ (membranous), NKX2.2+, FLI1+
Epithelioid sarcomaCD34+, INI1 (SMARCB1) loss, EMA+
Alveolar soft part sarcomaTFE3+ (nuclear)
If melanoma suspected: S100+, SOX10+, HMB-45+, melan-A+, tyrosinase+; keratins-

Recent Advances for Undifferentiated Tumors

  • INI1 (SMARCB1) loss: Key marker for malignant rhabdoid tumor, epithelioid sarcoma, poorly differentiated chordoma, some renal medullary carcinoma - nuclear loss is highly specific
  • SMARCA4 (BRG1) loss: SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated carcinoma, thoracic sarcoma; increasingly recognized entity
  • NUT IHC: Pathognomonic speckled nuclear pattern for NUT (NUTM1-rearranged) carcinoma - any undifferentiated midline carcinoma in young patients
  • INSM1: Superior neuroendocrine marker for crush artifact specimens; better retained in undifferentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas
  • TFE3 IHC: For alveolar soft part sarcoma and Xp11 translocation RCC in young patients
  • TRPS1: Emerging breast lineage marker
  • Claudin-4: Pan-epithelial marker useful when AE1/AE3 is equivocal
  • p40 vs p63: p40 (ΔNp63) is now preferred over p63 for squamous identification as it is more specific (p63 is positive in myoepithelial, prostate basal cells)
  • SOX10: More specific than S100 for melanoma; also positive in nerve sheath tumors

Summary Table: "Signature" IHC Markers by Context (2025)

ContextNewer/Preferred Markers (2023-25 updates)
CUP - prostateNKX3-1, PSMA (over PSA alone)
CUP - breastGATA3, TRPS1 (over GCDFP-15 alone)
CUP - colorectalSATB2 + CDX-2 (more specific together)
CUP - neuroendocrineINSM1 (supplements chromogranin/synaptophysin)
Lymphoma - MCLSOX11 (cyclin D1-negative MCL), BRAF V600E IHC
Lymphoma - DLBCLMYC + BCL2 double-expressor; PD-L1 for therapy
BreastHER2-low reporting; TRPS1; PD-L1 (TNBC)
Lung adeno vs SCCp40 (preferred over p63) + TTF-1 minimum panel
Lung NETINSM1; Ki-67 grading
Lung targeted therapyPD-L1 (22C3), ALK (D5F3), ROS1 (D4D6)
UndifferentiatedINI1 loss, SMARCA4 loss, NUT IHC, TFE3
CUP molecular eraNGS/CGP now complements or replaces extensive IHC
Key principle across all 6 categories: IHC results indicate a "suggestive primary profile" - no panel is 100% sensitive or specific. Pattern recognition using coexpression of multiple markers is more reliable than any single marker. Per the 2025 SEOM-GECOD and NCCN guidelines, tissue conservation for NGS/molecular profiling is now a priority alongside IHC, particularly in CUP and undifferentiated tumors.
Sources: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine 22E (2025), Fishman's Pulmonary Diseases 5E, Henry's Clinical Diagnosis and Management, Dermatology 2-Volume Set 5E; SEOM-GECOD CUP Guidelines 2025; NCCN Occult Primary v2.2025; Beauchamp et al., Cancer Metastasis Reviews 2023 (PMID: 37394540); Qiao et al., Front Oncol 2024 (PMID: 39659790)
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.