analyse_media
Reading File
Finding Sources
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed

bifascicular block prognosis

ECG Interpretation

Patient: M. Ronald, 35 y/o male | Recorded 24/08/2026, 03:15 AM (Casualty/Emergency Dept., stated hospital)

Measured parameters (from the printed header)

ParameterValueComment
Heart rate65 bpmNormal
P duration / PR interval80 / 150 msNormal
QRS duration148 msMarkedly prolonged (normal ≤110-120 ms)
QT / QTc448 / 457 msProlonged by the standard cutoff, but see note below
P / QRS / T axis72° / 147° / -18°P axis normal; QRS shows marked right axis deviation; T axis discordant from QRS
RV5/SV1, RV6/SV20.273/0.000 mV, 0.444/0.478 mVLow precordial voltages, no voltage criteria for LVH

Visual reading of the tracing

  • The rhythm strip (lead II) shows a regular, narrow P wave preceding every QRS at ~65/min - sinus rhythm.
  • Every QRS across all 12 leads is visibly wide and slurred, consistent with the machine's 148 ms measurement.
  • This combination of a very wide QRS + marked right axis deviation, with a normal PR interval (so this is not WPW, which would show a short PR with a delta wave), is the classic electrical signature of right bundle branch block (RBBB). Isolated RBBB alone doesn't usually push the axis this far to the right (+147°) - right axis deviation of this degree occurring together with RBBB is described in the literature as RBBB + left posterior fascicular block, i.e., a bifascicular block pattern (Ganong's Review of Medical Physiology; Goldman-Cecil Medicine, "Intraventricular blocks").
  • The T axis being discordant (-18°, opposite direction from the QRS) is an expected secondary repolarization change that accompanies a wide-QRS conduction block rather than necessarily indicating primary ischemia.
  • Regarding the "prolonged" QTc: because QT includes the QRS duration, a QRS this wide will mechanically prolong the QT/QTc reading. Subtracting QRS from QT gives a JT interval of 448 - 148 = 300 ms, which is not clearly abnormal - so the QTc prolongation here is largely an artifact of the wide QRS rather than a separate repolarization abnormality.

Clinical significance

Bifascicular block patterns matter clinically because:
  • They reflect diffuse conduction system disease and carry a risk of progression to higher-grade AV block.
  • If this patient has had syncope, presyncope, or unexplained dizziness, current evidence (a randomized trial cited in Goldman-Cecil Medicine, Sheldon et al., JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2022;8:239-248) supports pacemaker evaluation over implantable loop recorder monitoring in syncope with bifascicular block.
  • A wide QRS of this degree in an acute-care setting should also prompt a quick check for hyperkalemia or other toxic/metabolic causes of QRS widening, and a search for structural heart disease (echocardiogram), since these are common causes of new intraventricular conduction delay.

Caveat

This is a machine-measured tracing photographed on paper, and the printed disclaimer itself states "ask your doctor to confirm." Fine morphological details (e.g., exact V1 pattern - rSR' vs monophasic R, S-wave notching in lateral leads) are best confirmed by a treating physician or cardiologist with the original tracing and clinical context (symptoms, medication list, electrolytes, prior ECGs for comparison). I'd recommend urgent clinical correlation given the acute-care setting and the degree of conduction abnormality.

Mi?

Finding Sources
No clear signs of an acute MI on this tracing.
Why:
  • The abnormalities I found were conduction-related (QRS 148 ms, right axis deviation 147°, pattern of right bundle branch block ± left posterior fascicular block), not ischemic. I didn't see ST-segment elevation, ST depression, or pathological Q waves in the leads.
  • Importantly, RBBB does not mask ST/Q-wave changes of infarction the way LBBB does. Per Harrison's and Frameworks for Internal Medicine, it's specifically left BBB (and ventricular paced rhythms/WPW) that hide or mimic ischemic ST changes - RBBB leaves the ST segments and Q waves largely interpretable, so if there were an acute MI, it would generally still show through.
  • The T-wave axis discordance (-18°) I flagged is the expected secondary repolarization change that simply accompanies a wide QRS from bundle branch block - not itself a marker of ischemia.
Caveat: This is a read from a photographed printout, not a live systematic ST-segment review lead-by-lead. If there's any clinical concern (chest pain, dyspnea, diaphoresis, or this was drawn for that reason since it's a "Casualty" tracing at 3:15 AM), the standard of care is still troponin, comparison with any prior ECG, and repeat ECG/clinical correlation - a photo read is not a substitute for that.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.