Diagnosis and treatment
asthenozoospermia treatment male infertility
| Parameter | Patient's Result | WHO 5th Edition Reference Range |
|---|---|---|
| Ejaculate volume | 1 mL | ≥ 1.5 mL (lower reference limit) |
| Colour | Milky white | Normal |
| Liquefaction time | Normal | Normal (within 60 min) |
| Viscosity | Thin | Normal |
| Motile spermatozoa | Only 2-3 motile seen; rest all non-motile | Progressive motility ≥ 32%; total motility ≥ 40% |
At age 60, the primary goal of evaluation depends critically on why this semen analysis was done. If fertility/fatherhood is not the concern, treatment is not required. However, severe asthenozoospermia at this age may also reflect underlying systemic disease (diabetes, infection, vascular disease) that warrants investigation regardless of fertility goals.
Search for recent clinical guidelines on male infertility diagnosis and management
male infertility diagnosis management guidelines
male infertility clinical guidelines 2024 2025 EAU AUA ASRM
PMID: 40118737
PMID: 41312724
PMID: 41208521
PMID: 41678706
| Area | Update |
|---|---|
| Y-chromosome microdeletion testing | Revised indications and thresholds |
| Azoospermia evaluation | Updated workup algorithm |
| Karyotype testing | Updated recommendations |
| Imaging | Clarified which modalities should (and should not) be used; new indications for pelvic MRI in infertile males |
| Nonazoospermic patients | New recommendation on testicular sperm use |
| Semen analysis reference ranges | Updated to align with WHO 6th Edition (2021) reference values |
| Terminology | New table defining common semen analysis terms |
| Domain | Consensus Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Initial workup | Semen analysis (×2, WHO 6th Ed. thresholds) + hormonal profile + history + exam |
| Partner evaluation | Simultaneous female assessment in all cases |
| Genetic testing | Karyotype + Y-chromosome microdeletion for severe oligospermia/azoospermia |
| Varicocele | Treat if clinical varicocele + abnormal semen parameters |
| Azoospermia | Distinguish obstructive vs. non-obstructive; micro-TESE preferred for NOA |
| Antioxidants | Evidence remains uncertain; WHO 2026 withholds formal recommendation |
| Health counselling | Counsel all infertile men about cardiovascular and metabolic health risks |
| ART | ICSI preferred when severe motility defects are present |
Lips swelling after teeth extraction it is since 2 month what could be cause and treatment
persistent lip swelling after dental extraction orofacial granulomatosis
orofacial granulomatosis lip swelling treatment
cheilitis granulomatosa lip swelling orofacial granulomatosis

A series of three clinical photographs (a, b, and c) documenting the progression and treatment response of orofacial granulomatosis (cheilitis granulomatosa) in a pediatric patient. Photograph (a) shows the initial presentation with mild erythema and localized edema of the lower lip, displaying a dry texture and fine surface fissuring. Photograph (b) demonstrates a significant progression to macrocheilia, characterized by marked, diffuse swelling of both the upper and lower lips. The lip surfaces appear smooth, tense, and glossy, indicating severe interstitial edema. Photograph (c) depicts the clinical status after one year of combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine. There is a visible reduction in swelling compared to (b), though mild persistent enlargement remains compared to the baseline in (a). The surface texture has regained normal anatomical creases and a matte appearance. This sequence serves as a clinical reference for the extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease and the efficacy of biological maintenance therapy in managing orofacial granulomatosis.

A series of four clinical photographs demonstrating the progression of cheilitis granulomatosa of the lower lip in a patient with Crohn's disease over a four-year period (2011–2014) during infliximab therapy. The 2011 image shows severe, macrocheilia-type swelling of the lower lip with an indistinct vermillion border, distorted shape, and a visible surface erosion or ulceration. The 2012 image reveals persistent but slightly reduced edema with significant xerosis and fine white desquamation. By 2013, there is a further decrease in lip volume and a progressive return of the natural anatomical contour. The final 2014 image shows significant clinical improvement with minimal residual swelling, a clearly defined vermillion border, and a relatively smooth surface texture. This longitudinal comparison illustrates the therapeutic response of orofacial granulomatosis to anti-TNF-alpha biological therapy, highlighting the resolution of granulomatous inflammation and secondary cutaneous manifestations like edema and surface erosions.

Clinical photography of the perioral region shows diffuse lower-lip edema attributable to granulomatous cheilitis, a manifestation of orofacial granulomatosis subsequently associated with Crohn disease. The frontal facial view emphasizes swelling of the lower lip with mucosal erythema, a thickened vermilion border, and subtle tightening of perioral folds. No acute mucosal ulceration is evident; soft-tissue expansion dominates the phenotype. The case notes progression to gastrointestinal Crohn disease, underscoring the well-established link between orofacial granulomatosis and intestinal inflammatory bowel disease. This image exemplifies lip involvement as a prominent extraintestinal sign that may precede or accompany GI symptoms. Differential considerations include cheilitis granulomatosa, orofacial granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome, and angioedema or contact cheilitis. Imaging modality is clinical photography with a color-balanced digital capture, using a standardized frontal orientation and no contrast or staining. Pathophysiology involves granulomatous inflammation causing localized edema of the lips and perioral tissues. Clinically, recognition of orofacial granulomatosis as a potential early marker of Crohn disease supports prompt GI evaluation, histologic confirmation when indicated, and multidisciplinary management with dermatology and gastroenterology. Educational and research use includes dermato-gastroenterology correlation, case-based teaching, and dataset enrichment for orofacial granulomatous disease. This image supports education, research annotation, and algorithmic retrieval of granulomatous lip disease.
"Cheilitis granulomatosa is characterized by a sudden onset and progressive course, terminating in chronic enlargement of the lips... Usually, only enlargement is present, without ulceration, fissuring, or scaling." - Andrews' Diseases of the Skin


| Investigation | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Dental OPG X-ray | Rule out residual infection, dry socket, retained root |
| Lip biopsy (incisional) | Confirm granulomatous inflammation - the most important test |
| Full blood count + ESR/CRP | Infection or inflammation |
| Serum ACE + chest X-ray | Screen for sarcoidosis |
| Serum calcium | Elevated in sarcoidosis |
| Colonoscopy / GI referral | If Crohn's disease suspected |
| Patch testing (contact allergy panel) | Rule out allergic contact cheilitis |
| Review all medications | Rule out ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema |
This patient must see a dental surgeon + oral medicine specialist / dermatologist urgently. Two months of persistent post-extraction lip swelling requires:
- Dental X-ray to exclude residual infection
- Lip biopsy for definitive diagnosis
- Gastroenterology review to exclude Crohn's disease
Do not delay - the longer granulomatous swelling goes untreated, the more likely it becomes permanent due to connective tissue fibrosis.