Outcome measures used in Neuro-physiotherapy-Global measures of disability ...... All and every with each of that scale measures which domain, also name with scale details.
Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed
neurological rehabilitation AND outcome measures
Searching the Web
neurological rehabilitation global disability outcome measures Barthel Index Functional Independence Measure Modified Rankin Scale domains
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed
neurologic rehabilitation AND disability scales
Reading Web Page
https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/functional-in…
Finding Sources
Searching the Web
site:sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures Barthel Index Modified Rankin Disability Rating Scale Glasgow Outcome Scale WHODAS 2.0 domains scoring
Searching the Web
global disability scales neurological rehabilitation FIM FAM Barthel modified Rankin Glasgow Outcome Scale Disability Rating Scale domains scoring
Global disability outcome measures in neuro-physiotherapy
Global disability measures rate the overall effect of a neurological condition on independence, activity, participation, or care needs. They are different from:
- Impairment measures: strength, tone, ROM, sensation, balance
- Disease severity measures: NIHSS, Glasgow Coma Scale, UPDRS
- Single-task measures: 10-Metre Walk Test, TUG, Berg Balance Scale
- Quality-of-life measures: SF-36, EQ-5D
No single scale measures every aspect of disability. In practice, use one global measure plus targeted impairment, mobility, and participation measures.
A. Core generic global disability / independence scales
| Scale | Main domain measured | Population / use | Items or domains | Scoring and interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barthel Index (BI) | Basic activities of daily living (BADL) and physical dependence | Stroke, TBI, MS, geriatric neurology, inpatient rehabilitation | Feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toilet use, transfers, mobility, stairs | 10 items. Common scoring: 0-100, where 0 = total dependence and 100 = independence. Original version may use 0-20. Higher score = better independence. |
| Modified Barthel Index (MBI) | BADL, dependency, nursing care requirement | Stroke and general neurorehabilitation | Same basic 10 ADL areas as BI, but with more graded response options | Usually 0-100. Higher score = better ADL independence. It is often more sensitive than the original BI in moderate disability. |
| Functional Independence Measure (FIM) | Burden of care and independence in motor and cognitive daily activities | Broad neurorehabilitation: stroke, SCI, TBI, MS, Parkinsonism | 18 items: 13 motor and 5 cognitive | Each item is rated 1-7: 1 = total assistance; 7 = complete independence. Total 18-126. Motor: 13-91; cognitive: 5-35. Higher score = greater independence. |
| Functional Assessment Measure (FAM) | Higher-level cognitive, behavioural, communication and psychosocial disability | Mainly brain injury and complex neurological rehabilitation | 12 additional items used with FIM: swallowing, car transfer, community access, reading, writing, speech intelligibility, emotional status, adjustment to limitations, leisure use, orientation, concentration, safety awareness | Each FAM item is scored 1-7. It is not generally used alone. |
| FIM+FAM / UK FIM+FAM | Global disability including basic ADL, cognition, behaviour and community-reintegration functions | Acquired brain injury and complex neurological rehabilitation | 30 items: 18 FIM + 12 FAM | Total 30-210. Higher score = more independent function. The UK FIM+FAM resource identifies FIM as a widely used global disability measure and FAM as an extension for complex cognitive and psychosocial needs. |
| Katz Index of Independence in ADL | Basic self-care dependency | Frail adults, dementia, stroke, general rehabilitation | Bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, feeding | 6 activities, usually scored 0 or 1 each. Total 0-6. Higher score = more independence. Useful when substantial physical or cognitive impairment is present. |
| PULSES Profile | Functional dependency and rehabilitation needs | General rehabilitation, including neurological disability | Physical condition, Upper-limb function, Lower-limb function, Sensory function, Excretory function, Support factors | Each domain is graded 1-4. Total 6-24. Higher score = greater disability/dependency. Useful for rehabilitation planning rather than detailed outcome measurement. |
Barthel Index: components
| Domain | What is assessed |
|---|---|
| Feeding | Independent eating versus assistance needed |
| Bathing | Ability to bathe self |
| Grooming | Washing face, hair care, teeth, shaving |
| Dressing | Putting on and removing clothes |
| Bowels | Continence and assistance needed |
| Bladder | Continence and assistance needed |
| Toilet use | Getting to and using the toilet |
| Transfers | Bed-chair transfer ability |
| Mobility | Walking or wheelchair mobility |
| Stairs | Ability to ascend and descend stairs |
Strength: quick and easy, especially after stroke.
Limitation: poor assessment of cognition, communication, emotion, participation and high-level community function. It can have a ceiling effect in mild stroke. The RehabMeasures BI summary specifically cautions that BI does not capture the full impact of mild stroke-related disability.
Limitation: poor assessment of cognition, communication, emotion, participation and high-level community function. It can have a ceiling effect in mild stroke. The RehabMeasures BI summary specifically cautions that BI does not capture the full impact of mild stroke-related disability.
FIM: domains and items
| FIM domain | Items |
|---|---|
| Self-care | Eating, grooming, bathing, upper-body dressing, lower-body dressing, toileting |
| Sphincter control | Bladder management, bowel management |
| Transfers | Bed/chair/wheelchair transfer, toilet transfer, tub/shower transfer |
| Locomotion | Walking/wheelchair mobility, stairs |
| Communication | Comprehension, expression |
| Social cognition | Social interaction, problem-solving, memory |
FIM scoring levels
| Score | Level of assistance |
|---|---|
| 7 | Complete independence |
| 6 | Modified independence, device, extra time or safety issue |
| 5 | Supervision or set-up |
| 4 | Minimal assistance, patient performs at least 75% |
| 3 | Moderate assistance, patient performs 50-74% |
| 2 | Maximal assistance, patient performs 25-49% |
| 1 | Total assistance, patient performs less than 25% |
The FIM description confirms its 18-item structure, 13 motor plus 5 cognitive items, 1-7 ratings and 18-126 total range. It should be used by trained raters, ideally with interdisciplinary team consensus.
B. Single-item global disability scales
These scales are rapid but do not show which specific activity is limited.
| Scale | Main use | Domains / content | Score and meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) | Stroke outcome, especially acute stroke and clinical trials | One overall judgement combining symptoms, ADL, walking, cognition, communication and need for help | 0-6. Higher score = greater disability/death. |
| Rankin Scale | Original global stroke handicap scale | Overall dependence and social function | Original scale generally 0-5; mRS adds 6 = death and clearer descriptions. |
| Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) | Moderate-severe TBI and coma outcome | Overall recovery, independence and disability | 1-5, from death to good recovery. |
| Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) | TBI outcome, more sensitive than GOS | Independence at home and outside home, work, social/leisure life, relationships | 1-8, from death to upper good recovery. |
| Disability Rating Scale (DRS) | TBI across acute to chronic rehabilitation | Arousal, awareness, self-care dependence, cognitive ability for feeding/toileting/grooming, employability | 0-29, with 30 = death. Higher score = greater disability. |
| Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale for Pediatrics (GOSE-Peds) | Pediatric TBI | Age-adapted global outcome and functioning | Pediatric adaptation of GOSE. |
Modified Rankin Scale details
| mRS grade | Description |
|---|---|
| 0 | No symptoms |
| 1 | Symptoms present, but no significant disability. Performs all usual duties and activities. |
| 2 | Slight disability. Cannot perform all previous activities but manages own affairs without assistance. |
| 3 | Moderate disability. Needs some help but walks without assistance. |
| 4 | Moderately severe disability. Cannot walk or attend to bodily needs without assistance. |
| 5 | Severe disability. Bedridden, incontinent and requires constant nursing care/attention. |
| 6 | Death |
The mRS is the standard global disability outcome measure in stroke. It is a single-item ordinal scale, so it is fast but less informative for setting rehabilitation goals. Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology, 12th ed., describes it as a seven-category neurological disability scale from 0, no symptoms, to 6, death. A RehabMeasures summary also recommends incorporating physical, cognitive, speech and ADL information into the one final grade.
Glasgow Outcome Scale details
| GOS score | Outcome |
|---|---|
| 1 | Death |
| 2 | Vegetative state |
| 3 | Severe disability, conscious but dependent for daily support |
| 4 | Moderate disability, independent but with disability |
| 5 | Good recovery, resumes normal life with possible minor deficits |
GOSE: divides categories 3, 4, 5 and 6? More accurately, it divides severe disability, moderate disability and good recovery into upper and lower levels, producing 8 categories: 1 death, 2 vegetative state, 3 lower severe disability, 4 upper severe disability, 5 lower moderate disability, 6 upper moderate disability, 7 lower good recovery, 8 upper good recovery.
Disability Rating Scale domains
| DRS component | What it measures |
|---|---|
| Eye opening | Arousal |
| Verbal response | Awareness/responsiveness |
| Motor response | Responsiveness/motor reaction |
| Feeding | Level of cognitive and functional dependence |
| Toileting | Level of cognitive and functional dependence |
| Grooming | Level of cognitive and functional dependence |
| Level of functioning | Overall psychosocial functioning |
| Employability | Capacity to work |
C. International Classification of Functioning-based global disability measures
| Scale | Main domain | Scale details | Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
| WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) | Functioning and disability according to the ICF framework | Available in 12-item and 36-item versions; interview, self-report or proxy formats | Each item: 0 = none to 4 = extreme/cannot do. Raw scores can be summed; transformed total often reported as 0-100, where higher = more disability. |
| World Health Organization Quality of Life Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO-DAS II | Earlier name/version of WHODAS 2.0 | Same broad ICF-based assessment concept | Higher score = greater difficulty/disability. |
| Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) | Impact of ill health on daily behaviour and roles | 136 statements in 12 categories | Usually transformed to 0-100. Higher score = greater health-related dysfunction. |
| Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) | Post-acute acquired brain injury disability and community participation | Ability, adjustment and participation indices | Higher score = greater limitation; often converted to T-scores. |
| Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) | Community participation after TBI or stroke | Home integration, social integration and productive activity | Higher score = better community integration. This is mainly a participation outcome, not a pure disability score. |
WHODAS 2.0 domains
| WHODAS domain | Examples |
|---|---|
| Cognition | Understanding, communicating, concentrating, remembering |
| Mobility | Standing, moving around, leaving home |
| Self-care | Washing, dressing, eating, staying alone |
| Getting along | Interacting and maintaining relationships |
| Life activities | Household responsibilities, work or school |
| Participation | Joining in society, barriers, emotional impact, dignity |
The WHO WHODAS 2.0 guidance identifies these six domains and uses responses from no difficulty to extreme difficulty/cannot do. WHODAS is useful when the aim is to measure disability beyond walking and basic ADL.
D. Activity and participation measures often added to a global disability assessment
These are not always called “global disability scales,” but are commonly used in neuro-physiotherapy to capture disability outside basic self-care.
| Scale | Main domain | Components | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) | Higher-level activity and social participation | Domestic chores, leisure/work and outdoor activities | 15 items, usually 0-3 each; total 0-45. Higher = more frequent activity/participation. |
| Lawton Instrumental ADL Scale | Instrumental ADL | Telephone, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transport, medicines, finances | Commonly 0-8. Higher = greater independence. |
| Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale (NEADL) | Extended ADL after stroke | Mobility, kitchen, domestic and leisure activities | 22 items, total 0-66. Higher = more independence. |
| Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) | Social reintegration | Mobility, self-care, daily activity, family role, social role and coping | Usually 0-100. Higher = better reintegration. |
| Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) | Home, social and productive participation | Home integration, social integration, productivity | Higher = better integration. |
E. Condition-specific global disability measures used in neurological physiotherapy
These should be chosen when the patient has the relevant diagnosis. They are more responsive to that disorder than a generic scale.
| Condition | Scale | Domains / details | Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple sclerosis | Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) | Functional systems: pyramidal, cerebellar, brainstem, sensory, bowel/bladder, visual, cerebral/mental and other; later grades heavily depend on walking ability | 0-10, in 0.5 increments. Higher = worse disability. Limitation: ambulatory bias, less sensitive to upper-limb, cognition and fatigue. |
| Multiple sclerosis | Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) | Timed 25-Foot Walk, 9-Hole Peg Test, PASAT/SDMT | Composite score. It measures function, not a complete global disability rating. |
| Spinal cord injury | Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) | Self-care; respiration and sphincter management; mobility in room/toilet and indoors/outdoors | 0-100. Higher = greater independence. More SCI-specific than FIM. |
| Traumatic brain injury | DRS, GOS, GOSE, MPAI-4, FIM+FAM | Global recovery, dependency, cognition, behaviour, participation | Use according to phase of recovery. |
| Stroke | mRS, BI/MBI, FIM, Stroke Impact Scale | mRS = global disability; BI/FIM = ADL independence; SIS includes patient-perceived impact | Use mRS for broad outcome and BI/FIM for rehabilitation planning. |
| Parkinson disease | MDS-UPDRS Part II | Motor experiences of daily living, patient-reported function | Higher = greater disability. Combine with mobility and balance tests. |
| Guillain-Barré syndrome | Hughes GBS Disability Scale | Walking ability, need for support, ventilation and death | 0-6. Higher = greater disability. |
| Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis | ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, ALSFRS-R | Speech, salivation, swallowing, hand function, ADL, walking, stairs, respiration | 12 items, each 0-4; total 0-48. Higher = better function. |
| Cerebral palsy | Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) | Usual gross motor performance, sitting and mobility | Five levels, I = least limitation and V = most severe limitation. Classification, not a change-sensitive outcome measure. |
| Cerebral palsy | Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, PEDI-CAT | Daily activities, mobility, social/cognitive function and responsibility | Computer-adaptive or structured formats; higher = better functional performance. |
Practical selection in neuro-physiotherapy
| Clinical situation | Recommended global outcome measure(s) |
|---|---|
| Acute stroke | mRS for global outcome; BI/MBI or FIM for independence |
| Stroke inpatient rehabilitation | BI/MBI or FIM; add FAI, NEADL or SIS for higher-level function |
| Severe TBI | GOS/GOSE and DRS |
| TBI inpatient rehabilitation | FIM+FAM and DRS; add MPAI-4 or CIQ for community phase |
| Multiple sclerosis | EDSS plus WHODAS 2.0 or FIM if rehabilitation admission |
| Spinal cord injury | SCIM III; FIM may be added where locally required |
| Mixed neurological rehabilitation ward | FIM or BI/MBI; WHODAS 2.0 for a broader ICF-based view |
| Community rehabilitation | WHODAS 2.0 plus FAI, NEADL, CIQ or RNLI |
| Frail older neurological patient | BI/MBI or Katz ADL, plus Lawton IADL if community dwelling |
Key exam points
- mRS measures overall global disability after stroke. It is quick, ordinal and ranges from 0 to 6.
- Barthel Index measures basic ADL dependence, has 10 items, and commonly ranges from 0 to 100.
- FIM measures motor and cognitive independence, has 18 items, each scored 1 to 7, total 18 to 126.
- FIM+FAM is better than FIM alone for complex brain injury because it adds communication, behaviour, adjustment and community-function items.
- GOS/GOSE and DRS are key global outcome measures for traumatic brain injury.
- WHODAS 2.0 is an ICF-based disability scale covering cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities and participation.
- EDSS is a global disability scale for multiple sclerosis, but is strongly weighted toward walking ability.
- SCIM III is preferred for functional independence in spinal cord injury.
- A global disability score should be paired with specific measures of mobility, balance, upper-limb function, cognition, fatigue, participation and quality of life.
A useful evidence comparison in neurorehabilitation found that BI, FIM and FIM+FAM were all acceptable, reliable and responsive global disability measures, with FIM and FIM+FAM being broadly similar at the total-score level: Hobart et al..
Find recent guidelines on neurorehabilitation outcome measures
Reading File
Reading File
Finding Sources
Searching PubMed
neurorehabilitation AND outcome measures
Searching PubMed
stroke rehabilitation AND outcome measures
Searching the Web
2024 2025 guideline neurorehabilitation outcome measures stroke rehabilitation guideline outcome assessment Canadian Stroke Best Practices AHA
Reading Web Page
https://www.strokebestpractices.ca/recommendations/stroke-re…
Reading Article
PMID: 37548025
Reading Article
PMID: 39800160
Reading Article
PMID: 36812698
Searching the Web
VA DoD Clinical Practice Guideline Management of Stroke Rehabilitation 2024 PDF outcome measures assessment validated standardized
Searching PubMed
"outcome measures" AND "stroke rehabilitation"
Finding Sources
Reading Article
PMID: 40401760
Reading Article
PMID: 39832369
Reading Article
PMID: 38519084
Reading Article
PMID: 41257448
Reading Article
PMID: 41257457
Searching the Web
site:nice.org.uk NG236 stroke rehabilitation adults outcome measures assessment standardised validated 2023
Recent guidelines are mostly condition-specific, especially for stroke. I did not find one recent international guideline that prescribes a single universal outcome-measure battery for all neurorehabilitation diagnoses.
Most relevant recent guidelines
| Guideline | Year | What it says about outcome measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations, Rehabilitation, Recovery and Community Participation - 7th edition | 2025 update | Recommends early and ongoing standardized assessment using validated tools to guide goals, treatment planning, discharge planning and reassessment. Assessment should cover basic ADL, instrumental ADL, mobility, communication, cognition and community living. |
| European Stroke Organisation guideline on motor rehabilitation | 2025 | Focuses on upper-limb practice, gait, balance and sit-to-stand. It supports measuring treatment effects with outcomes aligned to the intervention, such as arm capacity, walking endurance, walking speed, balance and daily-life transfer. |
| VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Stroke Rehabilitation | 2024 | A 47-recommendation guideline for inpatient and outpatient/community rehabilitation. It supports structured assessment of motor, cognitive, communication, swallowing and psychosocial problems across the rehabilitation pathway. |
| NICE NG236: Stroke rehabilitation in adults | 2023, current UK guideline | Uses disability, ADL, extended ADL, participation, mood, generic health-related quality of life and stroke-specific patient-reported outcomes as important outcomes for rehabilitation decisions. |
| ESO consensus framework for motor rehabilitation after stroke | 2023 | States that rehabilitation should be guided by regular assessment of motor function and activity, use consensus-based measures including patient-reported outcomes, and link results to patient-centred goals. |
| Spanish Society of Neurorehabilitation guideline for disorders of consciousness | 2025 | Gives recommendations for assessment, diagnostic testing, prognosis and treatment in patients with coma or disorders of consciousness. Outcome measurement is necessarily diagnosis-specific in this group. |
| Pediatric stroke outcome-measures toolkit | 2023 | Reviews measures for global performance, motor function, cognition, language, behaviour/adaptive function and quality of life. It emphasizes psychometric quality and clinical feasibility. |
Practical guidance derived from these guidelines
A neuro-physiotherapy outcome-measure set should not be limited to a global disability score. Use measures across the ICF levels:
| ICF level | Guideline-consistent domains to measure | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Body function / impairment | Strength, motor control, tone, sensation, balance, fatigue, cognition, speech, swallowing | Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Modified Ashworth Scale, Berg Balance Scale, MoCA, Fatigue Severity Scale |
| Activity / disability | ADL, transfers, walking, stairs, upper-limb task performance | Barthel Index or Modified Barthel Index, FIM, 10-Metre Walk Test, 6-Minute Walk Test, Action Research Arm Test |
| Participation | Domestic activity, work/education, family and social roles, leisure and community reintegration | WHODAS 2.0, Frenchay Activities Index, Reintegration to Normal Living Index, Community Integration Questionnaire |
| Patient-reported outcomes | Perceived recovery, quality of life, fatigue, mood, confidence and participation | Stroke Impact Scale, Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale, EQ-5D, PROMIS measures |
| Global outcome | Overall dependency or disability | Modified Rankin Scale for stroke, GOSE/DRS for TBI, EDSS for MS, SCIM III for SCI |
What current guidance supports for stroke rehabilitation
The 2025 Canadian recommendations are currently among the most useful for neuro-physiotherapy practice. Their initial rehabilitation assessment guidance recommends that all people with acute stroke receive assessment of stroke severity and early rehabilitation needs. It specifies comprehensive cognitive and functional assessment with standardized, validated tools, including:
- Basic self-care: dressing, grooming, hygiene, feeding
- Functional mobility
- Communication
- Instrumental ADL: meal preparation, home management, financial management, shopping and community-living skills
- Ongoing reassessment as needs and goals change
The 2025 Canadian rehabilitation delivery guideline also includes upper and lower limb function, aerobic function, balance, mobility, ADL, spasticity, falls, communication, dysphagia, pain, vision, and bladder/bowel function. This supports using a domain-specific battery, not a single outcome scale.
Suggested minimum clinical battery
For adult stroke rehabilitation
| Time point | Core measures |
|---|---|
| Acute baseline | NIHSS for impairment severity, mRS for global disability, Barthel Index or MBI for basic ADL |
| Inpatient rehabilitation | Barthel/MBI or FIM, 10-Metre Walk Test, 6-Minute Walk Test if ambulant, Berg Balance Scale or Mini-BESTest, an upper-limb measure such as FMA-UE or ARAT |
| Discharge and community follow-up | mRS, Barthel/MBI or FIM, Stroke Impact Scale or SS-QOL, WHODAS 2.0 or a participation measure such as FAI/CIQ |
| When relevant | MoCA for cognition, PHQ-9 for depression, fatigue measure, falls efficacy/confidence measure, dysphagia and communication measures |
Diagnosis-specific global outcome measures
| Condition | Preferred global disability / functional measure |
|---|---|
| Stroke | mRS plus Barthel Index/MBI or FIM |
| Traumatic brain injury | GOSE and Disability Rating Scale; FIM+FAM in complex rehabilitation |
| Multiple sclerosis | EDSS, supplemented by MSFC and participation or patient-reported measures |
| Spinal cord injury | SCIM III |
| Parkinson disease | MDS-UPDRS Part II plus mobility, balance and participation measures |
| Guillain-Barré syndrome | GBS Disability Scale |
| Cerebral palsy | GMFCS for classification, plus GMFM and PEDI-CAT for function/outcome |
Recent guideline citations
-
[Practice Guideline - 2025] Alt Murphy et al. European Stroke Organisation guideline on motor rehabilitation. European Stroke Journal. PMID: 40401760. It gives evidence-based recommendations for upper-limb dose, gait dose, high-intensity gait training, task-specific transfer to daily life, group therapy and sit-to-stand training.
-
[Practice Guideline - 2025] Eapen et al. Stroke Rehabilitation: Synopsis of the 2024 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines. Annals of Internal Medicine. PMID: 39832369. The full VA/DoD 2024 guideline provides two care algorithms and 47 recommendations.
-
[Practice Guideline - 2025] Noé et al. Guideline: Neurorehabilitation in patients with disorder of consciousness. Neurologia. PMID: 39800160.
-
[Practice Guideline - 2024] Tang et al. Stroke rehabilitation in adults: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. PMID: 38519084. NICE treats ADL, extended ADL, participation restriction, psychological outcomes, generic health-related quality of life and stroke-specific PROMs as important rehabilitation outcomes.
-
[Practice Guideline - 2023] Kwakkel et al. Motor rehabilitation after stroke: European Stroke Organisation consensus-based definition and guiding framework. European Stroke Journal. PMID: 37548025.
-
[Practice Guideline - 2023] Feldman et al. Consensus-Based Evaluation of Outcome Measures in Pediatric Stroke Care: A Toolkit. Pediatric Neurology. PMID: 36812698.
A recent systematic review on participation outcomes in common neurological conditions also supports including participation alongside activity and impairment measures: [Systematic Review - 2024] Kossi Oyéné et al. Efficacy of rehabilitation interventions evaluated in common neurological conditions in improving participation outcomes. Clinical Rehabilitation. PMID: 37501621.
Bottom line: recent guidelines favour repeated, validated, goal-linked and patient-centred measurement across impairment, activity, participation and quality of life. For stroke, a practical core combination is mRS + Barthel/MBI or FIM + gait/balance measure + Stroke Impact Scale or WHODAS 2.0.
This is a shared conversation. Sign in to Orris to start your own chat.